III.

=Source.=--Lord Cromer's _Modern Egypt_, vol. i., p. 428.

(Macmillans.)

Looking back at what occurred after a space of many years, two

points are to my mind clear. The first is that no Englishman should

have been sent to Khartoum. The second is that, if anyone had to be

sent, General Gordon was not the right man to send. The reasons why

no Englishman should have been sent are now sufficiently obvious.

If he were beleaguered at Khartoum, the British Government might be

obliged to send an expedition to relieve him. The main object of

British policy was to avoid being drawn into military operations

in the Soudan. The employment of a British official at Khartoum

involved a serious risk that it would be no longer possible to

adhere to this policy, and the risk was materially increased when

the individual chosen to go to the Soudan was one who had attracted

to himself a greater degree of popular sympathy than almost any

Englishman of modern times.

Imperialism and Mr. Gladstone (1876-1887) · 第 73 / 117 题