TRANSVAAL CONVENTION (1884).

=Source.=--_Parliamentary Papers_, "Transvaal," C 3,947 of 1884, p.

47.

_A Convention between Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom

of Great Britain and Ireland, and the South African Republic._

Whereas the Government of the Transvaal State, through its

delegates, consisting of Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger,

President of the said State, Stephanus Jacobus Du Toit,

Superintendent of Education, and Nicholas Jacobus Smit, a member

of the Volksraad, have represented that the Convention signed at

Pretoria on the 13th day of August, 1881, and ratified by the

Volksraad of the said State on the 25th October, 1881, contains

certain provisions which are inconvenient, and imposes burdens

and obligations from which the said State is desirous to be

relieved, and that the south-western boundaries fixed by the said

Convention should be amended, with a view to promote the peace

and good order of the said State and of the countries adjacent

thereto; and whereas Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom

of Great Britain and Ireland has been pleased to take the said

representations into consideration.

Now, therefore, Her Majesty has been pleased to direct, and it is

hereby declared, that the following articles of a new Convention,

signed on behalf of Her Majesty by Her Majesty's High Commissioner

in South Africa, the Right Honourable Sir Hercules George Herbert

Robinson, Knight Grand Cross of the most distinguished Order

of St. Michael and St. George, Governor of the Colony of the

Cape of Good Hope, and on behalf of the Transvaal State (which

shall hereinafter be called the South African Republic) by the

above-named delegates, Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, Stephanus

Jacobus Du Toit, and Nicholas Jacobus Smit, shall, when ratified

by the Volksraad of the South African Republic, be substituted for

the articles embodied in the Convention of 3rd August, 1881; which

latter, pending such ratification, shall continue in full force and

effect.

[NOTE.--The word "Preamble" is not prefixed to the opening passage

of this Convention. When the suzerainty question arose in 1898 the

British argument was that the 1884 Convention only altered the

articles of the 1881 Convention, and left the Preamble in force;

the Boer argument was that the 1884 Convention had a preamble, and

therefore the earlier one must have been superseded.]

Imperialism and Mr. Gladstone (1876-1887) · 第 69 / 117 题