CHAPTER II

OLD BATTLEGROUNDS

It was in accordance with the fitness of things that the British Army

should fight and conquer on the very spots consecrated by the memories

of the most famous battles of old. From Gaza onwards we made our

progress by the most ancient road on earth, for this way moved

commerce between the Euphrates and the Nile many centuries before the

East knew West. We fought on fields which had been the battlegrounds

of Egyptian and Assyrian armies, where Hittites, Ethiopians, Persians,

Parthians, and Mongols poured out their blood in times when kingdoms

were strong by the sword alone. The Ptolemies invaded Syria by this

way, and here the Greeks put their colonising hands on the country.

Alexander the Great made this his route to Egypt. Pompey marched over

the Maritime Plain and inaugurated that Roman rule which lasted for

centuries; till Islam made its wide irresistible sweep in the seventh

century. Then the Crusaders fought and won and lost, and Napoleon's

ambitions in the East were wrecked just beyond the plains.

Up the Maritime Plain we battled at Gaza, every yard of which had

been contested by the armies of mighty kings in the past thirty-five

centuries, at Akir, Gezer, Lydda, and around Joppa. All down the ages

armies have moved in victory or flight over this plain, and General

Allenby in his advance was but repeating history. And when the

Turks had been driven beyond the Plain of Philistia, and the

Commander-in-Chief had to decide how to take Jerusalem, we saw the

British force move along precisely the same route that has been taken

by armies since the time when Joshua overcame the Amorites and the day

was lengthened by the sun and moon standing still till the battle

was won. Geography had its influence on the strategy of to-day as

completely as it did when armies were not cumbered with guns and

mechanical transport. Of the few passes from the Maritime Plain over

the Shephelah into the Judean range only that emerging from the green

Vale of Ajalon was possible, if we were to take Jerusalem, as the

great captains of old took it, from the north. The Syrians sometimes

chose this road in preference to advancing through Samaria, the Romans

suffered retreat on it, Richard Coeur de Lion made it the path for his

approach towards the Holy City, and, precisely as in Joshua's day and

as when in the first century the Romans fell victims to a tremendous

Jewish onslaught, the fighting was hardest about the Beth-horons, but

with a different result--the invaders were victorious. The corps which

actually took Jerusalem advanced up the new road from Latron through

Kuryet el Enab, identified by some as Kirjath-jearim where the

Philistines returned the Ark, but that road would have been denied to

us if we had not made good the ancient path from the Vale of Ajalon to

Gibeon. Jerusalem was won by the fighting at the Beth-horons as

surely as it was on the line of hills above the wadi Surar which

the Londoners carried. There was fighting at Gibeon, at Michmas, at

Beeroth, at Ai, and numerous other places made familiar to us by the

Old Testament, and assuredly no army went forth to battle on more

hallowed soil.

Of all the armies which earned a place in history in Palestine,

General Allenby's was the greatest--the greatest in size, in

equipment, in quality, in fighting power, and not even the invading

armies in the romantic days of the Crusades could equal it in

chivalry. It fought the strong fight with clean hands throughout, and

finished without a blemish on its conduct. It was the best of all the

conquering armies seen in the Holy Land as well as the greatest.

Will not the influence of this Army endure? I think so. There is an

awakening in Palestine, not merely of Christians and Jews, but of

Moslems, too, in a less degree. During the last thirty years there

have grown more signs of the deep faiths of peoples and of their

veneration of this land of sacred history. If their institutions and

missions could develop and shed light over Palestine even while the

slothful and corrupt Turk ruled the land, how much faster and more in

keeping with the sanctity of the country will the improvement be under

British protection? The graves of our soldiers dotted over desert

wastes and cornfields, on barren hills and in fertile valleys, ay, and

on the Mount of Olives where the Saviour trod, will mark an era more

truly grand and inspiring, and offer a far greater lesson to future

generations than the Crusades or any other invasion down the track of

time. The Army of General Allenby responded to the happy thought of

the Commander-in-Chief and contributed one day's pay for the erection

of a memorial near Jerusalem in honour of its heroic dead. Apart from

the holy sites, no other memorial will be revered so much, and future

pilgrims, to whatever faith they belong, will look upon it as a

monument to men who went to battle to bring lasting peace to a land

from which the Word of Peace and Goodwill went forth to mankind.

In selecting General Sir Edmund Allenby as the Palestine Army's chief

the War Cabinet made a happy choice. General Sir Archibald Murray

was recalled to take up an important command at home after the two

unsuccessful attempts to drive the Turks from the Gaza defences. The

troops at General Murray's disposal were not strong enough to take

the offensive again, and it was clear there must be a long period of

preparation for an attack on a large scale. General Allenby brought to

the East a lengthy experience of fighting on the Western Front, where

his deliberate methods of attack, notably at Arras, had given the

Allies victories over the cleverest and bravest of our enemies.

Palestine was likely to be a cavalry, as well as an infantry,

campaign, or at any rate the theatre of war in which the mounted arm

could be employed with the most fruitful of results. General Allenby's

achievements as a cavalry leader in the early days of the war marked

him as the one officer of high rank suited for the Palestine command,

and his proved capacity as a General both in open and in trench

warfare gave the Army that high degree of confidence in its

Commander-in-Chief which it is so necessary that a big fighting force

should possess. A tremendously hard worker himself, General Allenby

expected all under him to concentrate the whole of their energies

on their work. He had the faculty for getting the best out of his

officers, and on his Staff were some of the most enthusiastic soldiers

in the service. There was no room for an inefficient leader in any

branch of the force, and the knowledge that the Commander-in-Chief

valued the lives and the health of his men so highly that he would not

risk a failure, kept all the staffs tuned up to concert pitch. We

saw many changes, and the best men came to the top. His own vigour

infected the whole command, and within a short while of arriving at

the front the efficiency of the Army was considerably increased.

The Palestine G.H.Q. was probably nearer the battle front than any

G.H.Q. in other theatres of operations, and when the Army had broken

through and chased the enemy beyond the Jaffa-Jerusalem line, G.H.Q.

was opened at Bir Salem, near Ramleh, and for several months was

actually within reach of the long-range guns which the Turks

possessed. The rank and file were not slow to appreciate this. They

knew their Commander-in-Chief was on the spot, keeping his eye and

hand on everything, organising with his organisers, planning with

his operation staff, familiar with every detail of the complicated

transport system, watching his supply services with the keenness of a

quartermaster-general, and taking that lively interest in the medical

branch which betrayed an anxious desire for the welfare and health of

the men. The rank and file knew something more than this. They saw the

Commander-in-Chief at the front every day. General Allenby did not

rely solely on reports from his corps. He went to each section of the

line himself, and before practically every major operation he saw the

ground and examined the scheme for attack. There was not a part of the

line he did not know, and no one will contradict me when I say that

the military roads in Palestine were known by no one better than the

driver of the Commander-in-Chief's car. A man of few words, General

Allenby always said what he meant with soldierly directness, which

made the thanks he gave a rich reward. A good piece of work brought a

written or oral message of thanks, and the men were satisfied they

had done well to deserve congratulations. They were proud to have the

confidence of such a Chief and to deserve it, and they in their turn

had such unbounded faith in the military judgment of the General and

in the care he took to prevent unnecessary risk of life, that there

was nothing which he sanctioned that they would not attempt. Such

mutual confidence breeds strength, and it was the Commander-in-Chief's

example, his tact, energy, and military genius which made his Army a

potent power for Britain and a strong pillar of the Allies' cause.

Let it not be imagined that General Allenby in his victorious campaign

shone only as a great soldier. He was also a great administrator. In

England little was known about this part of the General's work, and

owing to the difficulties of the task and to the consideration which

had, and still has, to be shown to the susceptibilities of a number of

friendly nations and peoples, it may be long before the full story of

the administration of the occupied territory in Palestine is unfolded

for general appreciation. It is a good story, worthy of Britain's

record as a protector of peoples, and though from the nature of his

conquest over the Turks in the Bible country the name of General

Allenby will adorn the pages of history principally as a victor, it

will also stand before the governments of states as setting a model

for a wise, prudent, considerate, even benevolent, administration of

occupied enemy territory. In days when Powers driven mad by military

ambition tear up treaties as scraps of paper, General Allenby observed

the spirit as well as the letter of the Hague Convention, and found

it possible to apply to occupied territory the principles of

administration as laid down in the Manual of Military Law.

The natives marvelled at the change. In place of insecurity,

extortion, bribery and corruption, levies on labour and property and

all the evils of Turkish government, General Allenby gave the country

behind the front line peace, justice, fair treatment of every race and

creed, and a firm and equitable administration of the law. Every man's

house became his castle. Taxes were readily paid, the tax gatherers

were honest servants, and, none of the revenue going to keep fat

pashas in luxury in Constantinople, there came a prospect of

expenditure and revenue balancing after much money had been usefully

spent on local government. Until the signing of peace international

law provided that Turkish laws should apply. These, properly

administered, as they never were by the Turks, gave a basis of good

government, and, with the old abuses connected with the collection

of revenue removed, and certain increased taxation and customs dues

imposed by the Turks during the war discontinued, the people resumed

the arts of peace and enjoyed a degree of prosperity none of them had

ever anticipated. What the future government of Palestine may be is

uncertain at the time of writing. There is talk of international

control--we seem ever ready to lose at the conference table what a

valiant sword has gained for us--but the careful and perfectly correct

administration of General Allenby will save us from the criticism of

many jealous foreigners. Certainly it will bear examination by any

impartial investigator, but the best of all tributes that could be

paid to it is that it satisfied religious communities which did not

live in perfect harmony with one another and the inhabitants of a

country which shelters the people of many different races.

The Yilderim undertaking, as the Bagdad scheme was described, did not

meet with the full acceptance of the Turks. The 'mighty Jemal', as the

Germans sneeringly called the Commander of the Syrian Army, opposed it

as weakening his prospects, and even Enver, the ambitious creature and

tool of Germany, postponed his approval. It would seem the taking over

of the command of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force by General Allenby

set the Turks thinking, and made the German Military Mission in

Constantinople reconsider their plans, not with a view to a complete

abandonment of the proposal to advance on Bagdad, as would have been

wise, but in order to see how few of the Yilderim troops they could

allot to Jemal's army to make safe the Sinai front. There was an

all-important meeting of Turkish Generals in the latter half of

August, and Jemal stood to his guns. Von Falkenhayn could not get

him to abate one item of his demands, and there can be no doubt that

Falkenhayn, obsessed though he was with the importance of getting

Bagdad, could see that Jemal was right. He admitted that the Yilderim

operation was only practicable if it had freedom for retirement

through the removal of the danger on the Palestine front. With that

end in view he advocated that the British should be attacked, and

suggested that two divisions and the 'Asia Corps' should be sent from

Aleppo to move round our right. Jemal was in favour of defensive

action; Enver procrastinated and proposed sending one division to

strengthen the IVth Army on the Gaza front and to proceed with the

Bagdad preparations. The wait-and-see policy prevailed, but long

before we exerted our full strength Bagdad was out of the danger zone.

General Allenby's force was so disposed that any suggestion of

the Yilderim operation being put into execution was ruled out of

consideration.

Several documents captured at Yilderim headquarters at Nazareth in

September 1918, when General Allenby made his big drive through Syria,

show very clearly how our Palestine operations changed the whole of

the German plans, and reading between the lines one can realise how

the impatience of the Germans was increasing Turkish stubbornness

and creating friction and ill-feeling. The German military character

brooks no opposition; the Turks like to postpone till to-morrow what

should be done to-day. The latter were cocksure after their two

successes at Gaza they could hold us up; the Germans believed that

with an offensive against us they would hold us in check till the wet

season arrived.[1]

[Footnote 1: See Appendices I., II., and III.]

Down to the south the Turks had to bring their divisions. Their line

of communications was very bad. There was a railway from Aleppo

through Rayak to Damascus, and onwards through Deraa (on the Hedjaz

line) to Afule, Messudieh, Tul Keram, Ramleh, Junction Station to Beit

Hanun, on the Gaza sector, and through Et Tineh to Beersheba. Rolling

stock was short and fuel was scarce, and the enemy had short rations.

When we advanced through Syria in the autumn of 1918 our transport was

nobly served by motor-lorry columns which performed marvels in getting

up supplies over the worst of roads. But as we went ahead we, having

command of the sea, landed stores all the way up the coast, and unless

the Navy had lent its helping hand we should never have got to Aleppo

before the Turk cried 'Enough.' Every ounce of the Turks' supplies had

to be hauled over land. They managed to put ten infantry divisions and

one cavalry division against us in the first three weeks, but they

were not comparable in strength to our seven infantry divisions and

three cavalry divisions. In rifle strength we outnumbered them by two

to one, but if the enemy had been well led and properly rationed he,

being on the defensive and having strong prepared positions, should

have had the power to resist us more strongly. The Turkish divisions

we attacked were: 3rd, 7th, 16th, 19th, 20th, 24th, 26th, 27th, 53rd,

and 54th, and the 3rd Cavalry Division. The latter avoided battle, but

all the infantry divisions had heavy casualties. That the moral of the

Turkish Army was not high may be gathered from a very illuminating

letter written by General Kress von Kressenstein, the G.O.C. of the

Sinai front, to Yilderim headquarters on September 29, 1917.[1]

[Footnote 1: See Appendix IV.]

The troops who won Palestine and made it happier than it had been for

four centuries were exclusively soldiers of the British Empire.

There was a French detachment and an Italian detachment with General

Allenby's Army. The Italians for a short period held a small portion

of the line in the Gaza sector, but did not advance with our force;

the French detachment were solely employed as garrison troops. The

French battleship _Requin_ and two French destroyers cooperated with

the ships of the Royal Navy in the bombardment of the coast. Our Army

was truly representative of the Empire, and the units composing it

gave an abiding example that in unity rested our strength. From over

the Seven Seas the Empire's sons came to illustrate the unanimity

of all the King's subjects in the prosecution of the war. English,

Scottish, Irish, and Welsh divisions of good men and true fought side

by side with soldiers of varying Indian races and castes. Australia's

valiant sons constituted many brigades of horse and, with New Zealand

mounted regiments, became the most hardened campaigners in the

Egyptian and Palestine theatre of operations. Their powerful support

in the day of anxiety and trial, as well as in the time of triumph,

will be remembered with gratitude. South Africa contributed good

gunners; our dark-skinned brethren in the West Indies furnished

infantry who, when the fierce summer heat made the air in the Jordan

Valley like a draught from a furnace, had a bayonet charge which

aroused an Anzac brigade to enthusiasm (and Colonial free men can

estimate bravery at its true value). From far-away Hong Kong and

Singapore came mountain gunners equal to any in the world, Kroomen

sent from their homes in West Africa surf boatmen to land stores,

Raratongas from the Southern Pacific vied with them in boat craft and

beat them in physique, while Egypt contributed a labour corps and

transport corps running a long way into six figures. The communion of

the representatives of the Mother and Daughter nations on the stern

field of war brought together people with the same ideals, and if

there are any minor jealousies between them the brotherhood of arms

will make the soldiers returning to their homes in all quarters of the

globe the best of missionaries to spread the Imperial idea. Instead of

wrecking the British Empire the German-made war should rebuild it

on the soundest of foundations, affection, mutual trust, and common

interest.

How Jerusalem Was Won Being the Record of Allenby's Campaign in Palestine · 第 2 / 20 章