CHAPTER XXIII.

_THE ESCHATOLOGY OF THE GOSPEL._

Coifi, in his parable to the thanes and nobles of the North Humber

country, likened the present life of man to the flight of a sparrow

through one of their lighted halls, coming out of the night, and then

disappearing in the dark winter whence it came; and he asked for

Christianity a candid hearing, if perhaps she might tell the secrets of

the beyond. And so indeed she does, lighting up the "dark winter" with a

bright, though a partial apocalypse. It is not our purpose to enter into

a general discussion of the subject; our task is simply to arrest the

beams of inspired light hiding within this Gospel, and by a sort of

spectrum analysis to read from them what they are permitted to reveal.

And--

1. The Gospel teaches that the grave is not the end of life. It may seem

as if we were stating but a truism in saying this; yet if a truism, it

perhaps has not been allowed its due place in our thought, and its

restatement may not be altogether a superfluous word. We cannot study

the life of Jesus without noticing that His views of earth were not the

views of men in general. To them this world was everything; to possess

it, even in some infinitesimal quantity, was their supreme ambition; and

though in their better, clearer moments they caught glimpses of worlds

other than their own, yet to their distant vision they were as the

twinkling stars of the azure, far off and cold, soon losing themselves

in the haze of unreality, or setting in the shadows of the imposing

earth. To Jesus earth was but a fragment of a vaster whole, a fragment

whose substances were but the shadows of higher, heavenlier realities.

Nor were these outlying spaces to His mind voids of silence, a "dark

inane," without life or thought; they were peopled with intelligences

whose personalities were as distinctly marked as is this human _Ego_,

and whose movements, unweighted by the gyves of flesh, seemed subtle and

swift as thought itself. With one of these worlds Jesus was perfectly

familiar. With heaven, which was the abode of His Father and innumerable

hosts of angels, He was in close and constant correspondence, and the

frequent prayer, the frequent upward looks tell us how near and how

intensely real the heavenly places were to Him. But in the mind of Jesus

this empyrean of happiness and light had its antipodes of woe and

darkness, a penal realm of fearful shadow, and which, borrowing the

language of the city, He called the Gehenna of burning. Such were the

two invisible realms, lying away from earth, yet closely touching it

from opposite directions, and to one or other of which all the paths of

human life turned, to find their goal and their self-chosen destiny.

And not only so, but the transition from the Seen to the Unseen was not

to Jesus the abrupt and total change that it seems to man. To us the

dividing-line is both dark and broad. It seems to us a transmigration to

some new and strange world, where we must begin life _de novo_. To Jesus

the line was narrow, like one of the imaginary meridians of earth, the

"here" shading off into the "hereafter," while both were but the

hemispheres of one round life. And so Jesus did not often speak of

"death;" that was too human a word. He preferred the softer names of

"sleep" or "exodus," thus making death the quickener of life, or

likening it to a triumphal march from bondage to liberty. Nor was "the

Valley of the Shadow" to Jesus a strange, unfamiliar place. He knew all

its secrets, all its windings. It was His own territory, where His will

was supreme. Again and again He throws a commanding voice across the

valley, a voice which goes reverberating among the heights beyond, and

instantly the departed spirit retraces its steps, to animate again the

cold clay it had forsaken. "He is not the God of the dead, but of the

living," said Jesus, as He claimed for Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob an

existence altogether apart from the crumbling dust of Hebron; and as we

see Moses and Elias coming to the Mount of Transfiguration, we see that

the departed have not so far departed as to take no interest in earthly

things, and as not to hear the strike of earthly hours. And how clearly

this is seen in the resurrection life of Jesus, with which this Gospel

closes! Death and the Grave have done their worst to Him, but how little

is that worst! how insignificant the blank it makes in the Divine Life!

The few hours in the grave were but a semibreve rest in the music of

that Life; the Easter morning struck a fresh bar, and the music went on,

in the higher spaces, it is true, but in the same key and in the same

sweet strain. And just so is it with all human life; "the grave is not

our goal." Conditions and circumstances will of necessity change, as the

mortal puts on immortality, but the life itself will be one and the

same life, here amid things visible and temporal, and there amid the

invisible and eternal.

2. The Gospel shows in what respects the conditions of the after-life

will be changed. In chapter xx. 27 we read how that the Sadducees came

to Jesus, tempting Him. They were the cold materialists of the age,

denying the existence of spirits, and so denying the resurrection. They

put before Him an extreme, though not impossible case, of a woman who

had been the wife, successively, of seven brethren; and they ask, with

the ripple of an inward laugh in their question, "In the resurrection

therefore whose wife of them shall she be?" Jesus answered, "The sons of

this world marry, and are given in marriage: but they that are accounted

worthy to attain to that world, and the resurrection from the dead,

neither marry, nor are given in marriage: for neither can they die any

more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are sons of God, being

sons of the resurrection." It will be observed how Jesus plays with the

word around which the Sadducean mind revolves. To them marriage was a

key-word which locked up the gates of an after-life, and threw back the

resurrection among the impossibilities and absurdities. But Jesus takes

up their key-word, and turning it round and round in His speech, He

makes it unlock and open the inner soul of these men, showing how, in

spite of their intellectuality, the drift of their thoughts was but low

and sensual. At the same time Jesus shows that their test-word is

altogether mundane. It is made for earth alone; for having a nature of

flesh and blood, it cannot enter into the higher kingdom of glory.

Marriage has its place in the life whose termini are birth and death. It

exists mainly for the perpetuation and increase of the human race. It

has thus to do with the lower nature of man, the physical, the earthly;

but in the world to come birth, marriage, death will be outdated,

obsolete terms. Man then will be "equal unto the angels," the coarser

nature which fitted him for earth being shaken off and left behind,

amongst other mortalities.

And exactly the same truth is taught by the three posthumous appearances

recorded in this Gospel. When they appeared upon the Mount of

Transfiguration, Moses and Elias had been residents of the other world,

the one for nine, the other for fourteen centuries. But while possessing

the form, and perhaps the features of the old body of earth, the

glorious body they wear now is under conditions and laws altogether

different. How easy and aërial are its movements! Though it possesses no

wings, it has the lightness and buoyancy of a bird, moving through space

swiftly and silently as the light pulses through the ether. Or take the

body of Christ's resurrection life. It has not yet become the glorified

body of the heavenly life; it is in its transition state, between the

two; yet how changed it is! Lifted above the needs and laws of our

earth-bound nature, the risen Christ no longer lives among His own; He

dwells apart, where we cannot tell. When He does appear He comes in upon

them suddenly, giving no warning of His approach; and then, after the

bright though brief apocalypse, He vanishes as mysteriously as He came,

passing at the last on the clouds to heaven. There is thus some

correspondence between the body of the old and that of the new life,

though how far the resemblance extends we cannot tell; we can only fall

back upon the Apostle's words, which to our human ear sound like a

paradox, but which give us our only solution of the enigma, "It is

raised a spiritual body" (i Cor. xv. 44). It is no longer the "natural

body," but a supernatural one, with a spiritual instead of a material

form, and under spiritual laws.

But taking the Apostle's words as our base-line, and measuring from

them, we may throw our lines of sight across the hereafter, reading at

least as much as this, that whatever may be the pleasures or the pains

of the after-life, they will be of a spiritual, and not of a physical

kind. It is just here that our vision sometimes gets blurred and

indistinct, as all the descriptions of that after-life, even in

Scripture, are given in earthly figures. And so we have built up before

us a material heaven, with jasper walls, and gates of pearl, and gardens

of perennial fruits, with crowns and other palace delights. But it is

evident that these are but the earthly shadows of the heavenly

realities, the darkened glasses of our earthly speech, which help our

dull vision to gaze upon glories which the eye of our mortality hath not

seen, and which its heart cannot conceive, except dimly, as a few

"broken lights" pass through the dark lenses of these earthly figures.

What new senses may be created we do not know, but if the body of the

after-life is "a spiritual body," then its whole environment must be

changed. Material substances can no longer affect it, either to cause

pleasure or pain; and though we may not yet tell in what the delights of

the one state, or the pains of the other will consist, we do know that

they must be something other than literal palms and crowns, and other

than material fires. These figures are but the stammerings of our

earthly speech, as it tries to tell the unutterable.

3. Our Gospel teaches that character determines destiny. "A man's life,"

said Jesus, when rebuking covetousness (xii. 15), "consisteth not in the

abundance of the things which he possesseth." These are not life's

noblest aim, nor its truest wealth. They are but the accidents of life,

the particles of floating dust, caught up by the stream; they will be

left behind soon as the sediment, if not before, when they reach the

barrier of the grave. A man's possessions do not constitute the true

life; they do not make the real self, the man. Here it is not what a man

has, but what a man is. And a man is just what his heart makes him. The

outer life is but the blossoming of the inner soul, and what we call

character, in its objective meaning, is but the subtle and silent

influence, the odour, as we might call it, fragrant or otherwise, which

the soul unconsciously throws out. And even in this world character is

more than circumstance, for it gives aim and direction to the whole

life. Men do not always reach their goal in earthly things, but in the

moral world each man goes to his "own place," the place he himself has

chosen and sought; he is the arbiter of his own destiny.

And what we find to be a law of earth is the law of the kingdom of

heaven, as Jesus was constantly affirming. The future life would simply

be the present life, with eternity as its coefficient. Destiny itself

would be but the harvest of earthly deeds, the hereafter being only the

after-here. Jesus shows us how while on earth we may lay up "treasures

in the heavens," making for ourselves "purses which wax not old," and

thus becoming "rich toward God." He draws a vivid picture of "a certain

rich man," whose one estimate of life was "the abundance of the things

which he possessed," the size and affluence of his barns, and whose soul

was required of him just when he was congratulating it on the years of

guaranteed plenty, bidding it, "Take thine ease, eat, drink, and be

merry (xii. 16-12)." He does not here trace for us the destiny of such a

soul--He does this in another parable--but He pictures it as suddenly

torn away, and eternally separated, from all it had possessed before,

leaving it, perhaps, to be squandered thriftlessly, or consumed by the

fires of lust; while, starved and shrivelled, the pauper soul is driven

out from its earthly stewardship, to find, alas! no welcome in the

"eternal tabernacles." In the appraisement of this world such a man

would be deemed wise and happy, but to Heaven he is the "foolish one,"

committing the great, the eternal folly.

The same lesson is taught in the parables of the Housebuilders (vi. 47)

and of the Talents (xix. 12). In each there comes the inevitable test,

the down-rush of the flood and the reckoning of the lord, a test which

leaves the obedient secure and happy, the faithful promoted to honour

and rewards, passed up among the kings; but the disobedient, if not

entombed in the ruins of their false hopes, yet all shelterless from the

pitiless storm, and the unfaithful and slothful servant stripped of even

the little he had, passed downwards into dishonour and shame.

In another parable, that of the Rich Man and Lazarus (xvi. 19-31) we

have a light thrown upon our subject which is at once vivid and lurid.

In a few graphic words He draws for us the picture of strange contrasts.

The one is rich, dwelling in a palatial residence, whose imposing

gateway looked down upon the vulgar crowd; clothed in garments of Tyrian

purple and of Egyptian byssus, which only great wealth could purchase,

and faring sumptuously every day. So, with perpetual banquets, the rich

man lived his selfish, sensual life. With thought all centred upon

himself, and that his lowest self, he has no thoughts or sympathies to

spare for the outlying world. They do not even travel so far as to the

poor beggar who is cast daily at his gate, in hopes that some of the

shaken-out crumbs of the banquet may fall within his reach. Such is the

contrast--the extreme of wealth, and the extreme of poverty; the one

with troops of friends, the other friendless--for the verb shows that

the hands which laid him down by the rich man's gate were not the gentle

hands of affection, but the rough hands of duty or of a cold charity;

the one clothed in splendid attire, the other not possessing enough even

to cover his sores; the one gorged to repletion, the other shrunken and

starved; the one the anonymous Epicurean, the other possessing a name

indeed, but nought beside, but a name that had a Divinity hidden within

it,[6] and which was an index to the soul that bore it. Such were the

two characters Jesus portrayed; and then, lifting up the veil of

shadows, He shows how the marked contrast reappears in the after-life,

but with a strange inverting. Now the poor man is blessed, the rich in

distress; the one is enfolded in Abraham's bosom, the other enveloped in

flames; the one has all the delights of Paradise, the other begs for

just a drop of water with which to cool the parched tongue.

[6] The name "Lazarus" is derived from El-ezer, or "God helps."

It may be said that this is simply parable, set forth in language which

must not be taken literally. So it is; but the parables of Jesus were

not mere word-pictures; they field in solution essential truth. And when

we have eliminated all this figurative colouring there is still left

this residuary, elementary truth, that character determines destiny:

that we cast into our future the shadow of our present selves; that the

good will be blessed, and the evil unblessed, which means accursed; and

that heaven and hell are tremendous realities, whose pleasures and whose

pains lie alike deep beyond the sounding of our weak speech. When the

rich man forgot his duties to humanity; when he banished God from his

mansion, and proscribed mercy from his thoughts; when he left Heaven's

foundling to the dogs, he was writing out his book of doom, passing

sentence upon himself. The tree lies as it falls, and it falls as it

leans; and where is there place for the unforgiven, the unregenerate,

for the sensual and the selfish, the unjust and the unclean, but

somewhere in the outer darkness they themselves have helped to make? To

the sensual and the vile heaven itself would be a hell, its very joys

curdling into pain, its streets, thronged with the multitudes of the

redeemed, offering to the guilty and unrenewed soul but a solitude of

silence and anguish; and even were there no final judgment, no solemn

pronouncement of destiny, the evil could never blend with the good, the

pure with the vile; they would gravitate, even as they do now, in

opposite directions, each seeking its "own place." Wherever and whatever

our final heaven may be, no one is an outcast but who casts himself out,

a self-immolation, a suicide.

But is it destiny? it may be asked. May there not be an after-probation,

so that character itself may be transformed? may not the "great gulf"

itself disappear, or at last be bridged over, so that the repentant may

pass out of its penal but purifying fires? Such, indeed, is the belief,

or rather the hope, of some; but "the larger hope" as they are pleased

to call it, as far as this Gospel is concerned, is a beautiful but

illusive dream. He who was Himself the "Resurrection and the Life," and

who holds in His own hands the keys of death and of Hades, gives no hint

of such a posthumous palingenesis. He speaks again and again of a day of

test and scrutiny, when actions will be weighed and characters assayed,

and when men will be judged according to their works. Now it is at the

"coming" of the Son of man, in the glory of His Father, and with a

retinue of "holy angels;" now it is the returning of the lord, and the

reckoning with his servants; while again it is at the end of the world,

as the angel-reapers separate the wheat from the tares; or as He

Himself, the great Judge, with His "Come ye," passes on the faithful to

the heavenly kingdom, and at the same time, with His "Depart ye," drives

from His presence the unfaithful and unforgiven into the outer darkness.

Nor does Jesus say one word to suggest that the judgment is not final.

The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, whatever that may mean, shall not

be forgiven (xii. 10), or, as St. Matthew expresses it, "neither in this

world, nor in that which is to come." The unfaithful servant is "cut

asunder" (xii. 46); the enemies who would not have their Lord to reign

over them are slain (xix. 27); and when once the door is shut it is all

in vain that those outside cry, "Lord, open to us!" They had an open

door, but they slighted and scorned it, and now they must abide by their

choice, outside the door, outside the kingdom, with the "workers of

iniquity," where "there is weeping and gnashing of teeth" (xiii. 28).

Or if we turn again to the parable of the Rich Man, where is there room

for the "larger hope"? where is the suggestion that these "pains of

hell" may be lessened; and ultimately escaped altogether? We listen in

vain for one syllable of hope. In vain he makes his appeal to "father

Abraham;" in vain he entreats the good offices of Lazarus; in vain he

asks for a momentary alleviation of his pain, in the boon of one drop of

water: between him and help, yea, between him and hope, is a "great gulf

fixed, ... that none may cross" (xvi. 26).

"That none may cross." Such are the words of Jesus, though here put in

the mouth of Abraham; and if finality is not here, where can we find it?

What may be the judgment passed upon those who, though erring, are

ignorant, we cannot tell, though Jesus plainly indicates that the number

of the stripes will vary, as they knew, or they did not know, the Lord's

will; but for those who had the light, and turned from it, who saw the

right, but did it not, who heard the Gospel of love, with its great

salvation, and only rejected it--for these there is only an "outer

darkness" of eternal hopelessness. And what is the outer darkness itself

but the darkness of their own inner blindness, a blindness which was

wilful and persistent?

Our Gospel thus teaches that death does not alter character, that

character makes destiny, and that destiny once determined is unalterable

and eternal. Or, to put it in the words of the angel to the seer, "He

that is unrighteous, let him do unrighteousness still: and he that is

filthy, let him be made filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him

do righteousness still: and he that is holy, let him be made holy still"

(Rev. xxii. 11).

Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of St Luke · 第 23 / 26 章