CHAPTER IV.

THE EMPIRE STATE.

At the far southeast of New York City, where the Hudson and East River

meet to form the inner bay, is an ill-kept park that might be made the

loveliest garden in the world. Nowhere do the features that have caused

New York to take rank as the first port of America stand forth more

clearly. The soft evening breeze tells of a climate as good as the world

can show; the setting sun floods with light a harbor secure and vast,

formed by the confluence of noble streams, and girt with quays at which

huge ships jostle; the rows of 500-pounder Rodmans at “The Narrows” are

tokens of the nation‘s strength and wealth; and the yachts, as well

handled as our own, racing into port from an ocean regatta, give

evidence that there are Saxons in the land. At the back is the city,

teeming with life, humming with trade, muttering with the thunder of

passage. Opposite, in Jersey City, people say: “Every New Yorker has

come a good half-hour late into the world, and is trying all his life to

make it up.” The bustle is immense.

All is so un-English, so foreign, that hearing men speaking what Czar

Nicholas was used to call “the American tongue,” I wheel round,

crying--“Dear me! if here are not some English folk!” astonished as

though I had heard French in Australia or Italian in Timbuctoo.

The Englishman who, coming to America, expects to find cities that smell

of home, soon learns that Baker Street itself, or Portland Place, would

not look English in the dry air of a continent four thousand miles

across. New York, however, is still less English than is Boston,

Philadelphia, or Chicago--her people are as little Saxon as her streets.

Once Southern, with the brand of slavery deeply printed in the foreheads

of her foremost men, since the defeat of the rebellion New York has to

the eye been cosmopolitan as any city of the Levant. All nationless

towns are not alike: Alexandria has a Greek or an Italian tinge; San

Francisco an English tone, with something of the heartiness of our

Elizabethan times; New York has a deep Latin shade, and the democracy of

the Empire State is of the French, not of the American or English type.

At the back, here, on the city side, are tall gaunt houses, painted red,

like those of the quay at Dort or of the Boompjes at Rotterdam, the

former dwellings of the “Knickerbockers” of New Amsterdam, the founders

of New York, but now forgotten. There may be a few square yards of

painting, red or blue, upon the houses in Broadway; there may be here

and there a pagoda summer-house overhanging a canal; once in a year you

may run across a worthy descendant of the old Netherlandish families;

but in the main the Hollanders in America are as though they had never

been; to find the memorials of lost Dutch empire, we must search Cape

Colony or Ceylon. The New York un-English tone is not Batavian. Neither

the sons of the men who once lived in these houses, nor the Germans

whose names are now upon the doors, nor, for the matter of that, we

English, who claim New York as the second of our towns, are the to-day‘s

New Yorkers.

Here, on the water‘s edge, is a rickety hall, where Jenny Lind sang when

first she landed--now the spot where strangers of another kind are

welcomed to America. Every true republican has in his heart the notion

that his country is pointed out by God for a refuge for the distressed

of all the nations. He has sprung himself from men who came to seek a

sanctuary--from the Quakers, or the Catholics, or the pilgrims of the

_Mayflower_. Even though they come to take the bread from his mouth, or

to destroy his peace, it is his duty, he believes, to aid the

immigrants. Within the last twenty years there have landed at New York

alone four million strangers. Of these two-thirds were Irish.

While the Celtic men are pouring into New York and Boston, the New

Englanders and New Yorkers, too, are moving. They are not dying. Facts

are opposed to this portentous theory. They are going West. The unrest

of the Celt is mainly caused by discontent with his country‘s present,

that of the Saxon by hope for his private future. The Irishman flies to

New York because it lies away from Ireland; the Englishman takes it upon

his road to California.

Where one race is dominant, immigrants of another blood soon lose their

nationality. In New York and Boston the Irish continue to be Celts, for

these are Irish cities. In Pittsburg, in Chicago, still more in the

country districts, a few years make the veriest Paddy English. On the

other hand, the Saxons are disappearing from the Atlantic cities, as the

Spaniards have gone from Mexico. The Irish here are beating down the

English, as the English have crushed out the Dutch. The Hollander‘s

descendants in New York are English now; it bids fair that the Saxons

should be Irish.

As it is, though the Celtic immigration has lasted only twenty years,

the results are already clear: if you see a Saxon face upon the

Broadway, you may be sure it belongs to a traveler, or to some raw

English lad bound West, just landed from a Plymouth ship. We need not

lay much stress upon the fact that all New Yorkers have black hair and

beard: men may be swarthy and yet English. The ancestors of the

Londoners of to-day, we are told, were yellow-headed roysterers; yet not

one man in fifty that you meet in Fleet Street or on Tower Hill is as

fair as the average Saxon peasant. Doubtless, our English eastern

counties were peopled in the main by low-Dutch and Flemings: the Sussex

eyes and hair are rarely seen in Suffolk. The Puritans of New England

are sprung from those of the “associated counties,” but the victors of

Marston Moor may have been cousins to those no less sturdy Protestants,

the Hollanders who defended Leyden. It may be that they were our

ancestors, those Dutchmen that we English crowded out of New

Amsterdam--the very place where we are sharing the fate we dealt. The

fiery temper of the new people of the American coast towns, their

impatience of free government, are better proofs of Celtic blood than

are the color of their eyes and beard.

Year by year the towns grow more and more intensely Irish. Already of

every four births in Boston, one only is American. There are 120,000

foreign to 70,000 native voters in New York and Brooklyn. Montreal and

Richmond are fast becoming Celtic; Philadelphia--shades of Penn!--can

only be saved by the aid of its Bavarians. Saxon Protestantism is

departing with the Saxons: the revenues of the Empire State are spent

upon Catholic asylums; plots of city land are sold at nominal rates for

the sites of Catholic cathedrals, by the “city _step_-fathers,” as they

are called. Not even in the West does the Latin Church gain ground more

rapidly than in New York City: there are 80,000 professing Catholics in

Boston.

When is this drama, of which the first scene is played in Castle Garden,

to have its close? The matter is grave enough already. Ten years ago,

the third and fourth cities of the world, New York and Philadelphia,

were as English as our London: the one is Irish now; the other all but

German. Not that the Quaker City will remain Teutonic: the Germans, too,

are going out upon the land; the Irish alone pour in unceasingly. All

great American towns will soon be Celtic, while the country continues

English: a fierce and easily-roused people will throng the cities, while

the law-abiding Saxons who till the land will cease to rule it. Our

relations with America are matters of small moment by the side of the

one great question: Who are the Americans to be?

Our kinsmen are by no means blind to the dangers that hang over them.

The “Know-Nothing” movement failed, but Protection speaks the same voice

in its opposition to commercial centers. If you ask a Western man why

he, whose interest is clearly in Free Trade, should advocate Protection,

he fires out: “Free Trade is good for our American pockets, but it‘s

death to us Americans. All your Bastiats and Mills won‘t touch the fact

that to us Free Trade must mean salt-water despotism, and the ascendency

of New York and Boston. Which is better for the country--one New York,

or ten contented Pittsburgs and ten industrious Lowells?”

The danger to our race and to the world from Irish ascendency is perhaps

less imminent than that to the republic. In January, 1862, the mayor,

Fernando Wood, the elect of the “Mozart” Democracy, deliberately

proposed the secession from the Union of New York City. Of all the

Northern States, New York alone was a dead weight upon the loyal people

during the war of the rebellion. The constituents of Wood were the very

Fenians whom in our ignorance we call “American.” It is America that

Fenianism invades from Ireland--not England from America.

It is no unfair attack upon the Irish to represent them as somewhat

dangerous inhabitants for mighty cities. Of the sixty thousand persons

arrested yearly in New York, three-fourths are alien born: two-thirds of

these are Irish. Nowhere else in all America are the Celts at present

masters of a city government--nowhere is there such corruption. The

purity of the government of Melbourne--a city more democratic than New

York--proves that the fault does not lie in democracy: it is the

universal opinion of Americans that the Irish are alone responsible.

The State legislature is falling into the hands of the men who control

the city council. They tell a story of a traveler on the Hudson River

Railroad, who, as the train neared Albany--the capital of New York--said

to a somewhat gloomy neighbor, “Going to the State legislatur’?” getting

for answer, “No, sir! It‘s not come to that with me yet. Only to the

State prison!”

Americans are never slow to ridicule the denationalization of New York.

They tell you that during the war the colonel of one of the city

regiments said: “I‘ve the best blood of eight nations in the ranks.”

“How‘s that?” “I‘ve English, Irish, Welsh, Scotch, French, Italians,

Germans.” “Guess that‘s only seven.” “Swedes,” suggested some one. “No,

no Swedes,” said the colonel. “Ah! I have it: I‘ve some Americans.”

Stories such as this the rich New Yorkers are nothing loth to tell; but

they take no steps to check the denationalization they lament. Instead

of entering upon a reform of their municipal institutions, they affect

to despise free government; instead of giving, as the oldest New England

families have done, their tone to the State schools, they keep entirely

aloof from school and State alike. Sending their boys to Cambridge,

Berlin, Heidelberg, anywhere rather than to the colleges of their native

land, they leave it to learned pious Boston to supply the West with

teachers, and to keep up Yale and Harvard. Indignant if they are pointed

at as “no Americans,” they seem to separate themselves from everything

that is American: they spend summers in England, winters in Algeria,

springs in Rome, and Coloradans say with a sneer, “Good New Yorkers go

to Paris when they die.”

Apart from nationality, there is danger to free government both in the

growth of New York City, and in the gigantic fortunes of New Yorkers.

The income, they tell me, of one of my merchant friends is larger than

the combined salaries of the president, the governors, and the whole of

the members of the legislatures of all the forty-five States and

territories. As my informant said, “He could keep the governments of

half a dozen States as easily as I can support my half dozen children.”

There is something, no doubt, of the exaggeration of political jealousy

about the accounts of New York vice given in New England and down

South, in the shape of terrible philippics. It is to be hoped that the

overstatement is enormous, for sober men are to be found even in New

York who will tell you that this city outdoes Paris in every form of

profligacy as completely as the French capital outherods imperial Rome.

There is here no concealment about the matter; each inhabitant at once

admits the truth of accusations directed against his neighbor. If the

new men, the “petroleum aristocracy,” are second to none in their

denunciations of the Irish, these in their turn unite with the oldest

families in thundering against “Shoddy.”

New York life shows but badly in the summer-time; it is seen at its

worst when studied at Saratoga. With ourselves, men have hardly ceased

to run from business and pleasures worse than toil to the comparative

quiet of the country house. Among New Yorkers there is not even the

affectation of a search for rest; the flight is from the drives and

restaurants of New York to the gambling halls of Saratoga; from winning

piles of greenbacks to losing heaps of gold; from cotton gambling to

roulette or faro. Long Branch is still more vulgar in its vice; it is

the Margate, Saratoga the Homburg of America.

“Shoddy” is blamed beyond what it deserves when the follies of New York

society are laid in a body at its door. If it be true that the New York

drawing-rooms are the best guarded in the world, it is also true that

entrance is denied as rigidly to intellect and eminence as to wealth. If

exclusiveness be needed, affectation can at least do nothing toward

subduing “Shoddy.” Mere cliqueism, disgusting every where, is ridiculous

in a democratic town; its rules of conduct are as out of place as kid

gloves in the New Zealand bush, or gold scabbards on a battle-field.

Good meat, and drink, and air, give strength to the men and beauty to

the women of a moneyed class; but in America these things are the

inheritance of every boy and girl, and give their owners no advantage in

the world. During the rebellion, the ablest generals and bravest

soldiers of the North sprang, not from the merchant families, but from

the farmer folk. Without special merit of some kind, there can be no

such thing as aristocracy.

Many American men and women, who have too little nobility of soul to be

patriots, and too little understanding to see that theirs is already, in

many points, the master country of the globe, come to you, and bewail

the fate which has caused them to be born citizens of a republic, and

dwellers in a country where men call vices by their names. The least

educated of their countrymen, the only grossly vulgar class that America

brings forth, they fly to Europe “to escape democracy,” and pass their

lives in Paris, Pau, or Nice, living libels on the country they are

believed to represent.

Out of these discordant elements, Cubans, Knickerbockers, Germans,

Irish, “first families,” “Petroleum,” and “Shoddy,” we are forced to

construct our composite idea--New York. The Irish numerically

predominate, but we have no experience as to what should be the moral

features of an Irish city, for Dublin has always been in English hands;

possibly that which in New York appears to be cosmopolitan is merely

Celtic. However it may be, this much is clear, that the humblest

township of New England reflects more truly the America of the past, the

most chaotic village of Nebraska portrays more fully the hopes and

tendencies of the America of the future, than do this huge State and

city.

If the political figure of New York is not encouraging, its natural

beauty is singularly great. Those who say that America has no scenery,

forget the Hudson, while they can never have explored Lake George, Lake

Champlain, and the Mohawk. That Poole‘s exquisite scene from the

“Decameron,” “Philomela‘s Song,” could have been realized on earth, I

never dreamt until I saw the singers at a New Yorker‘s villa on the

Hudson grouped in the deep shades of a glen, from which there was an

outlook upon the basaltic palisades and lake-like Tappan Zee. It was in

some such spot that De Tocqueville wrote the brightest of his brilliant

letters--that dated “Sing Sing”--for he speaks of himself as lying on a

hill that overhung the Hudson, watching the white sails gleaming in the

hot sun, and trying in vain to fancy what became of the river where it

disappeared in the blue “Highlands.”

That New York City itself is full of beauty the view from Castle Garden

would suffice to show; and by night it is not less lovely than by day.

The harbor is illuminated by the colored lanterns of a thousand boats,

and the steam-whistles tell of a life that never sleeps. The paddles of

the steamers seem not only to beat the water, but to stir the languid

air and so provoke a breeze, and the lime-lights at the Fulton and Wall

Street ferries burn so brightly that in the warm glare the eye reaches

through the still night to the feathery acacias in the streets of

Brooklyn. The view is as southern as the people: we have not yet found

America.

Greater Britain: A Record of Travel in English-Speaking Countries During 1866-7 · 第 4 / 34 章