PREFACE TO THE ORIGINAL EDITION.

In submitting the following pages to the Public, I feel that it

is incumbent upon me to explain by what circumstances the

materials from which the Work has been compiled were placed at my

disposal. The original Diary, comprehending six volumes, closely

written in short-hand by Mr. Pepys himself, belonged to the

valuable collection of books and prints, bequeathed by him to

Magdalene College, Cambridge, and had remained there unexamined,

till the appointment of my Brother, the present Master, under

whose auspices the MS. was deciphered by Mr. John Smith, with a

view to its publication.

My Brother's time, however, being too much engrossed by more

important duties to admit of his editing the work, the task of

preparing it for the press was undertaken by me at his request.

The Diary commences January 1st, 1659-60 and after being

regularly kept for ten years, it is brought to a sudden

conclusion, owing to the weak state of Mr. Pepys's eyes, which

precluded him from continuing or resuming the occupation. As he

was in the habit of recording the most trifling occurrences of

his life, it became absolutely necessary to curtail the MS.

materially, and in many instances to condense the matter; but the

greatest care has been taken to preserve the original meaning,

without making a single addition, excepting where, from the

short-hand being defective, some alteration appeared absolutely

necessary. It may be objected by those who are not aware how

little is known from authentic sources of the History of the

Stage about the period of the Restoration, that the notices of

theatrical performances occur too frequently; but as many of the

incidents recorded, connected with this subject, are not to be

met with elsewhere, I thought myself justified in retaining them,

at the risk of fatiguing those readers who have no taste for the

concerns of the Drama. The general details may also, in some

instances, even in their abridged form, be considered as too

minute; nor is it an easy task, in an undertaking of this sort,

to please everybody's taste: my principal study in making the

selection, however, has been to omit nothing of public interest;

and to introduce at the same time a great variety of other

topics, less important, perhaps, put tending in some degree to

illustrate the manners and habits of the age.

In justice to Mr. Pepys's literary reputation, the reader is

forewarned that he is not to expect to find in the Diary accuracy

of style or finished composition. We should rather consider the

Work as a collection of reminiscences hastily thrown together at

the end of each succeeding day, for the exclusive perusal of the

Author.

The Journal contains the most unquestionable evidences of

veracity; and, as the writer made no scruple of committing his

most secret thoughts to paper, encouraged no doubt by the

confidence which he derived from the use of short-hand, perhaps

there never was a publication more implicitly to be relied upon

for the authenticity of its statements and the exactness with

which every fact is detailed. Upon this point, I can venture to

speak with the less hesitation, having, in preparing the sheets

for the press, had occasion to compare many parts of the Diary

with different accounts of the same transactions recorded

elsewhere; and in no instance could I detect any material error

or wilful misrepresentation.

The Notes at the bottom of the pages were introduced to elucidate

obscure passages; and I have been tempted occasionally to insert

short Biographical Sketches of the principal persons who are

named, accompanied by such references as will enable the curious

reader to inform himself more fully respecting them. In some

instances I experienced considerable difficulty in identifying

the individuals; but I trust that the notices will be found, on

the whole, sufficiently correct to answer the object intended.

In justice to the Reverend John Smith, (with whom I am not

personally acquainted,) it may be added, that he appears to have

performed the task allotted to him, of deciphering the short-hand

Diary, with diligence and fidelity, and to have spared neither

time nor trouble in the undertaking.

The best account of Mr. Pepys occurs in the Supplement to

Collier's Historical Dictionary, published soon after his death,

and written, as I have reason to believe, by his relative Roger

Gale. Some particulars may also be obtained from Knight's Life

of Dean Colet; Chalmers's Biographical Dictionary; Cole's MSS. in

the British Museum: the MSS in the Bodleian and Pepysian

Libraries, and the Cockerell Papers.

The Diary of Samuel Pepys · 第 6 / 32 题