Milton was in error when he wrote,—

“Thick as Autumnal leaves that strew the brooks in Vallambrosa.”

The trees of Vallambrosa, being pines, do not fall thick in autumn, and

the brooks, consequently, are not strewed with them.

_Dante as a Naturalist_

Dante says in the “Inferno” (Canto xvii),—“As at times the wherries lie

on shore, that are part in water and part on land, the beaver adjusts

himself to make his war,” etc.

“Lo bevero s’assetta a far sua guerra.”

_Bevero_ should be _lontra_, the otter. The latter answers to the

description, seeking his prey half on land and half in water, and living

on the fish he cunningly catches, whereas the subsistence of the beaver

is drawn exclusively from the vegetable kingdom. The otter is

carnivorous; the beaver derives his nutriment from the bark of deciduous

trees, preferably, as shown by their cuttings, birch, poplar, willow,

maple, and ash, together with the roots of the pond lily, and also the

coarse grasses that grow on the margins of their ponds.

_Cassio or Iago?_

John Hill Burton, in the _Book-Hunter_, speaking of purloining from

books leaves of whose intrinsic value the owner is ignorant, says,—

“The notions of the collector about such spoil are the converse of those

which Cassio professed to hold about his good name, for the scrap

furtively removed is supposed in no way to impoverish the loser, while

it makes the recipient rich indeed.”

It is not Cassio, but Iago who says that good name in man and woman is

the immediate jewel of their souls, the loss of which enriches not

others, but makes them poor indeed. The error is worth correcting; for

there is no more exquisite touch of art, no finer exhibition of subtle

and profound knowledge of man than the teaching by the lips of this

supreme scoundrel the wide difference between the intellectual

perception of a moral sentiment and its actual possession.

_In Time of Peace Prepare for War_

When the honorary degree of LL.D. was conferred by the University of

Pennsylvania upon President Roosevelt, he made an address in

acknowledgment of the distinction, and in honor of the date, which was

Washington’s birthday anniversary, in the course of which he gave out

the subjoined maxim as one of those in which Washington in his Farewell

Address bequeathed to his fellow countrymen for their instruction and

guidance:

“To be prepared for war is the most effective means to promote peace.”

This maxim appears neither in Washington’s Farewell Address nor in any

other speech or writing of the Father of his Country. The passage which

President Roosevelt probably had in mind, and which he quoted from

memory without verifying either its source or its exact language, occurs

in Washington’s first annual address or message to Congress, delivered

on January 8, 1790, nearly seven years before the Farewell Address was

written. What Washington said about preparation for war was this:

“To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving

peace.”

The difference between the foregoing and the incorrect version presented

at Philadelphia by Mr. Roosevelt is not merely verbal. Washington

declared that adequate provision for the common defence was “one of the

most” effective means of preserving peace. Washington as quoted by Mr.

Roosevelt is made to declare unqualifiedly that such provision is the

“most” effective means of promoting peace. The significance of the

misquoted superlative is obvious.

_Collins_ vs. _Prior_

When Mr. Lowell was our Minister at the Court of St. James, he made an

address on Coleridge, in Westminster Abbey, in the course of which he

quoted the following couplet, attributing it to Collins,—

“Abra was with him ere he spoke her name,

And if he called another, Abra came.”

The lines thus incorrectly quoted are by Prior, and will be found in his

“Solomon.” The monarch is speaking of a female slave who had a real

affection for him,—

“_And, when I called another, Abra came._”

_Gladstone’s Heber_

Mr. Gladstone, in his well-known article, entitled “Kin Beyond Sea,”

misquoted the couplet from Heber’s “Palestine.” Instead of the lines,—

“No workman steel, no ponderous hammers rung,

Like some tall palm the stately fabric sprung”—

as incorrectly given by Mr. Gladstone, they should read,—

“No hammer fell, no ponderous axes rung,

Like some tall palm the mystic fabric sprung.”

_Balboa_

Why is it that well-informed people so persistently forget the name of

the man who first discovered the Pacific Ocean? Keats, “on looking into

a volume of Chapman’s Homer” thought of the oceans and the stars, and

sang,—

“Then felt I like some watcher of the skies

When a new planet swims into his ken,

Or like stout Cortez, when with eagle eyes

He gazed at the Pacific; all his men

Gazed at each other with a wild surmise,

Silent upon a peak in Darien.”

Next came the German Emperor, crediting Sir Francis Drake with, having

first seen the “great water.” For the benefit of such as fall into this

error, it may be stated that the first European to see the Pacific Ocean

from the American continent was Vasco Nuñez de Balboa, who beheld it

from the eminence now known as Culebra, about half way across the

Isthmus of Panama. Neither Cortez nor Sir Francis Drake, had any share

in its achievement.

_Cenotaph_

A Boston journal quoted from a letter of the Rev. W. C. McCoy on a newly

dedicated monument as follows: “The moss-grown cenotaphs of Ancient

Roman valor held no dust more sacred than do the unmarked graves where

sleep your honored dead to-day.” This would be very fine were it not for

the erroneous and misleading use of one word. A cenotaph happens to be a

monument erected at some place other than the spot where sleep the bones

of him whose valor it illustrates.

_Bishop Ken’s Doxology_

A sermon of the late Rev. Dr. T. De Witt Talmage has this glowing

passage:

“When Cromwell’s army went into battle, he stood at the head of them one

day, and gave out the long-metre Doxology to the tune of the “Old

Hundred,” and that great host, company by company, regiment by regiment,

battalion by battalion, joined in the Doxology:

“‘Praise God, from whom all blessings flow,

Praise Him, all creatures here below;

Praise Him above, ye heavenly host,

Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.’

“And while they sang they marched, and while they marched they fought,

and while they fought they got the victory.”

It seems a pity to destroy a good story, but chronology is very

despotic. Oliver Cromwell died in 1658. Bishop Ken, who has always been

credited with this grand doxology, was born in 1637, and was then,

therefore, only about twenty-one years old. Hymnologists give 1697 as

the year in which Bishop Ken wrote the Doxology as the last verse of his

morning and evening hymns. This would place the composition about half a

century after Cromwell’s last battle in the civil war, and some forty

years after his death.

_St. Paul to the Ephesians_

In the first edition of Dombey and Son (ch. xii.), Dr. Blimber, the

master of a select school at Brighton, is made to say to one of his

offending pupils, “Johnson will repeat to me to-morrow morning, before

breakfast, without book, and from the Greek Testament, the first chapter

of the First Epistle of Saint Paul to the Ephesians.” In imposing this

penalty, the pompous pedagogue overlooked the fact that there is but one

Epistle to the Ephesians in the New Testament. Mr. Dickens’s attention

must have been awakened to his error, as it was corrected in subsequent

editions.

_Byron’s Greek_

In Prof. Albert H. Smyth’s “Life of Bayard Taylor” occurs this sentence:

“At the Piræus Taylor saw Mrs. Black, ‘The Maid of Athens,’ to whom

Byron sang in impossible and ungrammatical Greek.”

The allusion is evidently to the concluding line of the stanzas,

Ζωή μου σᾶς ἀγαπῶ,

which means simply, “My life, I love thee.”

Ought not Professor Smyth to have stayed his pen from this unnecessary

impeachment of Byron’s knowledge of Greek, when he remembered that the

poet had lived on familiar terms with Greeks long before he went to

fight and die for the independence of their famous land? The line given

above is colloquial modern Greek, exactly suited to the character of the

poem, and was not intended for ancient classic Greek.

_Triple Error_

In the “Heart of Midlothian” (ch. 1.) is the following passage

respecting Effie Deans:

“She amused herself with visiting the dairy, in which she had so long

been assistant, and was near discovering herself to May Hettly, by

betraying her acquaintance with the celebrated receipt for Dunlop

cheese, that she compared herself to Bedreddin Hassan, whom the vizier,

his father-in-law, discovered by his superlative skill in composing

cream-tarts with pepper in them.”

Brewer, in his “Reader’s Hand Book,” points out several errors in these

few lines: (1) “cream-tarts” should be _cheese-cakes_; (2) the charge

was that he made cheese-cakes _without_ putting pepper in them, and not

that he made “cream-tarts _with_ pepper;” (3) it was not the vizier, his

father-in-law, but his mother, the widow of Noureddin, who made the

discovery, and why? For the best of all reasons—because she herself had

taught her son the receipt of Damascus. See “Arabian Nights” Noureddin

Ali.

Brewer also shows that Thackeray, in “Vanity Fair” (ch. 3) repeated at

second-hand Scott’s allusion to Bedreddin, instead of quoting directly

from the original. He makes Rebecca Sharp say, “I ought to have

remembered the pepper which the Princess of Persia puts in the

cream-tarts in the ‘Arabian Nights.’” Aside from this repetition of

Scott’s blunders, it was not a princess, but Bedreddin Hassan who was

the confectioner. Nor could it have been a princess of Persia, for

Bedreddin’s mother was the widow of the vizier of Balsora, at that time

quite independent of Persia.

_Mistakes of Our Best Writers_

Besides the rhetorical blunders and inaccuracies of our best writers,

their pages are sprinkled with violations of the plainest grammatical

rules. Take, by way of illustration, a few specimens from some of the

masters of the English language:

Blair, the rhetorician, says, “The boldness, freedom, and variety of our

blank verse _is_ infinitely more favorable than rhyme to all kinds of

sublime poetry.”

Latham, the philologist, says, “The following facts _may_ or have been

_adduced_ as reasons on the other side.”

Addison says, “I do not mean that I think _any one_ to blame for taking

due care of _their_ health.”

Junius says, “_Both_ minister and magistrate _is_ compelled to choose

between _his_ duty and _his_ reputation.”

Dryden says, “The reason is perspicuous why no French plays when

translated _have_ or ever can _succeed_ on the English stage.”

Gibbon says, “The _use_ of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice

_were_ often subservient to the propagation of the faith.” And again,

“The _richness_ of her arms and apparel _were_ conspicuous in the

foremost ranks.”

Macaulay says, “The poetry and eloquence of the Augustan age _was_

assiduously studied in Mercian and Northumbrian monasteries.”

Facts and fancies for the curious from the harvest-fields of literature · 第 113 / 160 题