Marlborough House, August 25, 1735.

My Lord,—I was ill in bed (as I frequently am) when I received the

honour of your grace’s letter. I find by it, notwithstanding the many

civil expressions you are pleased to make use of, that I must be forced

to sitt down contented with a refusal, and the Duke of St. Albans is to

be gratified at my expense. Some people, perhaps, may wonder it should

be so, but I have for a long time ceased wondering at anything.

If I enter any farther into this affair, ’tis not, I assure you, with

the least view that anything I can urge will have an effect; but ’tis

some satisfaction to show that I apprehend myself still in the right,

though I should have the misfortune not to prevail by doing so. There

can be but three considerations to induce the Duke of St. Albans to

insist on this point, which are, that he believes he has a right to it,

or that it will be of use to him, or that it will mortifie me. I think I

have already sufficiently proved that he has not the least glimmering of

right to it. I have beat him, if I may say so, out of his

fortifications, and forced him in his castle to yield up the constable’s

pretensions; and I will now as plainly shew that it can be of no use to

him: and then the third reason alone will subsist, which is, that ’tis

done to mortifie me, against which there is no arguing. All I can say

is, I think I have not deserved it. The Duke lives, as other constables

have done, at the Keep; and, unless he chooses to goe out of his way,

(which for ought I know he may,) I can’t see the least benefit it can be

to him. It is not his road to London, neither is there any road through

the park, and I hope none will ever be made, and for this reason, as I

told you before, nobody but the royal family and ranger were ever

suffered to goe in with their coaches. The Duke of Marlborough gave the

Duke of St. Albans a key to walk in it at his pleasure, but little

imagined to have his civility requited in the manner it was, by having

other keys made from it, the Duke distributing them as he thought fit,

coming into the park with his coach and chaise, and making use of it in

many other respects, just as if he had been the ranger. But your grace

tells me this favour could not well be refused him, and that he is not

to go through the park in right of his office, but by her Majesty’s

leave. I am sorry your grace imagined that this way of turning it

softened the point, because, in my poor apprehension, it seems extremely

to aggravate the injury. To give the Duke leave, contrary to my earnest

representations and entreaties, (who am ranger of the park,) when he

owns he has no right to it, seems so manifest a partiality in his

favour, that it cannot be but exceeding mortifying to me. If his grace’s

merit be not very great, it is natural to conclude my demerit must be

so; and as I am not conscious of having deserved this disregard, I am

the more concerned to find it. I have formerly been in courts as your

grace is now, and I there observed that the ministerial policy always

loaded people with favours in proportion to their abilities, and the use

they could be of in return to them. Perhaps I may be mistaken, but I ask

your grace, Is the Duke of St. Albans a man of that high importance as

to be worth making a precedent for—which may be attended with ill

consequences, and in process of time bring difficultys on the crown

itself? How can others who live at Windsor be refused this favour, which

has been granted to the Duke of St. Albans, simply as such? His

predecessors in his office, I may say without wronging him, have some of

them been as distinguished as himself. Prince Rupert, son to the Queen

of Bohemia, and nephew to King Charles, was one of them that frequently

resided at the Keep, and never desired nor ever enjoyed this privilege;

the Dukes of Northumberland and Kent, Lord Cobham, Lord Carlisle, and

others, never thought of asking it; but though his predecessors never

had it, will his successors for the future ever be content without it?

No, though they should not be of equal merit with his grace. So that, in

truth my lord, you see I am not pleading on my own account singly, but

I’m endeavouring to support the true interest of the crown, and making a

stand against an innovation that will hereafter bring difficultys upon

them. But I cannot flatter myself that anything I can say will gett this

leave revoked; therefore I should be glad to have it explain’d how far,

my lord, it is to extend. Is the Duke to have the privilege of giving

keys, as he actually has done, to whomsoever he pleases? Are they all to

come into the park with their coaches and chaises? This will greatly

prejudice the park, but may be done if her Majesty pleases to order it.

But as to his putting cattle, and authorising his gamekeepers to kill

game for his own use and the Dowager Duchess of St. Albans, this I take

to be an encroachment on my grant, and that I presume is not intended,

nor can I be content to suffer it. I am sensible I have made this letter

too tedious; but ’tis extremely natural to say all one can in defence of

what one takes to be one’s right. This, my lord, must plead my excuse,

and engage you to pardon

Your Grace’s most obedient

And most humble servant,

S. MARLBOROUGH.

To the Duke of Newcastle.

_An Abstract of the last Will and Testament of Sarah Duchess of

Marlborough._

This is the last Will and Testament of me, Sarah Duchess Dowager of

Marlborough, made this eleventh day of August, in the year of our Lord,

1744.

My will and desire is that I may be buried at Blenheim, near the body of

my dear husband John late Duke of Marlborough; and if I die before his

body is removed thither, I desire Francis Earl of Godolphin to direct

the same to be removed to Blenheim aforesaid, as was always intended.

And I direct that my funeral may be made private, and with no more

expense than decency requires; and that no mourning be given to any one,

except such of my servants as shall attend at my funeral.

As concerning my estate, I give the same in manner and form following.

I devise to Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and Beversham Filmer, of Lincoln’s

Inn, Esq., their heirs, &c., all my manors, parsonage, rectory,

advowsons, messuages, lands, tenements, tithes, and hereditaments in the

several counties of Surrey, Oxford, Buckingham, and Huntingdon, which

were lately the several estates of Richard Holditch, Francis Hawes,

William Astell, and Robert Knight, Esqrs.

And also my manors, &c., in the said county of Buckingham, which were

late the estate of Richard Hampden, Esq., deceased.

And also my manor, rectory, &c., in the county of Buckingham, which were

some time the estate of Sir John Wittewronge, Bart., deceased.

And also my manor, &c. in the same county, formerly the estate of Sir

Thomas Tyrrel, Bart., deceased.

And also my manor, &c. in the county of Bedford, which were late the

estate of Sir John Meres, Knight.

And also my freehold and copyhold messuages, &c. in the county of

Bedford, which were late the estate of Bromsall Throckmorton, Esq.

And also my manor, &c. in possession and reversion, in the county of

Bedford, which were late the estate of Edward Snagg, Esq.

And also my rectory and tithes of Steventon, in the county of Bedford,

which were late the estate of Peter Floyer, Esq.

And also my lands, &c. in the county of Bedford, which were the estate

of John Culliford, Esq., and Mary his wife.

And also my manor, &c. in the county of Berks, which were the estate of

Richard Jones, Esq.

And also my manor, &c. in the county of Berks, which were the estate of

Robert Packer, Esq.

And also my messuage, lands, &c. in the county of Berks, which were late

the estate of Thomas Bedford, clerk.

And also my manor, &c. in the county of Oxford, which were late the

estate of Sir Cecil Bishop, Bart.

And also my manors, &c. in Northamptonshire, which were late the estate

of Mrs. Elizabeth Wiseman.

And also my manor, &c. in the county of Northampton, late the estate of

Sir William Norwich, Bart.

And also my manor, &c. in the county of Northampton, late the estate of

Nathaniel Lord Crewe, Lord Bishop of Durham.

And also that part of my estate at St. Albans still retained by me.

And also my manors, &c. in the county of Stafford, which were the estate

of Viscount Fauconberg.

And also my manor, &c. freehold and copyhold, in the county of Norfolk,

late the property of Gabriel Armiger, Esq.

And also my manors, &c. in the county of Leicester and Northampton,

which were the estates of Sir Thomas Cave.

And all other my manors, &c. in the counties of Surrey, Oxford,

Huntingdon, Buckingham, Bedford, Berks, Northampton, Hertford, Stafford,

Norfolk, and Leicester, (always subject to charges made by indenture on

the marriage of my grandson, John Spencer, Esq. to Georgiana Carolina,

his now wife, daughter to Lord Carteret.)

John Spencer, the son of my said grandson John Spencer, shall have,

arising from the said estates &c., an annuity (during the life of his

father) of 2,000_l._, which he shall be empowered legally to enforce.

And whereas the late Duke of Marlborough directed by his will that a

yearly sum of 3,000_l._ should be charged upon the estates devised upon

Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and Beversham Filmer, for each and every of the

sons which may be born to Charles Spencer, (now Duke of Marlborough,)

and the grandson of the same; I, with a desire to carry out such

intention, hereby direct that the said sum be chargeable upon the said

estates so devised, during the joint lives of the said Charles Duke of

Marlborough and such son or grandson: Always provided that such son or

grandson shall not covenant to do or do any act which shall set aside or

bar any intent declared or expressed in the will of the late Duke of

Marlborough; in which case such annuity shall utterly cease.

Upon such son or grandson marrying and attaining the age of twenty-one

years, the said annual sum of 3,000_l._ shall no longer be paid to him;

but an annual charge not exceeding 1,500_l._ shall be paid to any woman

with whom he shall marry, for the term of her life.

Provided always, that my said estates shall never be chargeable with

more than one such annuity, as a provision for any such woman, at one

and the same time.

And all my said manors, &c. devised to Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and

Beversham Filmer, subject to the annuities and charges therein

expressed, I will and direct the same to be in TRUST for my grandson

John Spencer, for and during the term of his natural life; and after

that, to the USE of the said Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and Beversham

Filmer, and their heirs, during the natural life of John Spencer, in

TRUST, to preserve the contingent uses thereof; the said John Spencer to

receive the rents and profits thereof, (with similar covenants relating

to John Spencer the younger, and succeeding heirs.)

And whereas the dean and chapter of Christ’s Church—Canterbury, did

lease unto me the scite and court lodge of the manor of Agney, in the

county of Kent, I hereby bequeath the said court lodge, &c.

And also my lands, &c. held on lease in the county of Buckingham.

And also all other my leasehold estates (excepting such as I shall

otherwise dispose of) to the USE of the said Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and

Beversham Filmer, in TRUST for such uses and persons as are herein

expressed concerning my various manors and freeholds.

ITEM, I give unto Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and Beversham Filmer, all my

manor of Wimbledon, &c. in Surrey.

And also my leasehold rectory of Wimbledon, for their USE, and in trust,

&c. (with similar covenants respecting John Spencer and his heirs.)

And my will is, that all my household goods, pictures, and furniture

that shall be in my said buildings and gardens at Wimbledon, shall be

considered as heirlooms.

And my will is, and I hereby expressly declare, that if the said John

Spencer (my grandson) shall become bound or surety for any person or

persons whatever for any sum or sums of money, or if he, or any person

or persons in _trust_ for him, shall take from any king or queen of

these realms any pension, or any office or employment, civil or

military, (except the rangership of the great or little parks at

Windsor,) then shall all these my intents and covenants in behalf of the

said John Spencer become void, as if he were actually dead.

(_The same with regard to John Spencer the younger._)

And whereas by lease from the crown I am possessed of all that capital

messuage which I now inhabit, called _Marlborough-house_, with all its

appurtenances, within or near the parishes of St. James, the liberty of

Westminster, and St. Martin in-the-Fields, in the county of Middlesex,

for the term of fifty years:

Now I hereby give and bequeath all my interest in the said capital

messuage, &c. unto my executors (subject to such charge thereon as is

hereinafter mentioned) upon the TRUSTS following: That is to say, in

_trust_ for the said John Spencer the father, for so long a period of

the fifty years as he shall live; and then in trust for George Spencer,

commonly called Marquis of Blandford, eldest son and heir apparent of

Charles Duke of Marlborough; and after his decease, in trust for any son

of the said George Spencer who shall attain his majority.

Provided the said George Spencer shall have no son, then in _trust_ for

Charles Spencer, second son of Charles Duke of Marlborough, and his son,

(with similar provisions, provided Charles Spencer shall have no son,

conferring the interest upon such other son of Charles Duke of

Marlborough as shall attain his majority.)

Provided always, that should any attempt be made by any of these

legatees to dispose, let, exchange, or give up possession in any manner

of Marlborough-house, or commit any act likely to subvert any of the

declared intentions of the late Duke of Marlborough with respect to his

will, such bequest shall become utterly void, and my executors are

hereby empowered to dispose of all my interest in the said messuage, and

pay over the money as part of my personal estate.

I am likewise possessed of another lease from the crown, bearing date

Feb. 13, 1728, not yet expired.

Now I give and bequeath the said lease to my executors in _trust_ for

the holder of Marlborough-house for the time being, and subject to the

same conditions and limitations.

And whereas I am empowered by the Duke of Marlborough’s will to dispose

of such goods as are my own in Marlborough-house, and of which there is

an inventory:

Now I bequeath all such goods, furniture, pictures, &c., to my grandson

John Spencer, his executors, &c.

ITEM, I give unto my grandson, Charles Duke of Marlborough, all my

furniture, pictures, &c., which shall be in Blenheim-house, in

Oxfordshire, at the time of my decease; but upon the express condition

that he do not remove any of the goods or furniture from Althorp-house,

but permit the same to be enjoyed by my grandson, John Spencer, except

the same shall be of greater value than those in Blenheim-house; then

may he remove such part thereof as shall leave no more in value than

shall be equal to that which at the time of my decease was in

Blenheim-house; and should he not perform this condition, then I leave

the said furniture, &c. in Blenheim-house, to John Spencer my grandson,

his executors, &c.

And my will is, that all my goods, &c. in my mansion-house at Holywell,

in St. Albans, in the county of Hertford, shall continue there, and be

always held therewith, as far as the law will permit of.

And whereas by letters patent on the 18th day of July, in the eighth

year of her reign, her late majesty Queen Anne granted me the

_rangership of Windsor Great Park_, giving the said place in TRUST to

James Craggs, Samuel Edwards, and Charles Hodges, for me and my heirs:

Now I will that the said Samuel Edwards shall hold the same in trust for

my grandson John Spencer, his heirs, &c.

And I give all the goods, &c., which may be in the chief lodge,

belonging to me, to my said grandson John Spencer. (_Similar provisions

with regard to the Little Park._)

I give unto my granddaughter Isabella Duchess Dowager of Manchester all

my piece of ground and the messuage thereon in Dover-street, in the

county of Middlesex; together with all the goods, furniture, &c., in the

said messuage.

I give unto Hugh Earl of Marchmont, and Beversham Filmer, Esq., and

James Stephens, all my leasehold piece of ground and brick messuage in

Grosvenor-street, in the parish of St. George’s, Hanover-square, in

_trust_ for _John Spencer the son_.

ITEM, I hereby give unto Hugh Earl of Marchmont, Beversham Filmer,

Thomas Lord Bishop of Oxford, and James Stephens, my joint executors,

2,000_l._ each, for their care and trouble about this my will.

All other property whatsoever, comprising money, mortgages, securities,

&c., after payment of my just debts, and such bequests as herein before

or after in any codicil mentioned, I bequeath to my said executors, in

trust for John Spencer, my grandson.

* * * * *

This will, which occupies in the original eight skins of parchment, is

witnessed by the following persons, and signed and sealed by the

Duchess.

FANE.

EDMUND LONDON.

W. LEE.

JOHN SCROPE.

THE CODICIL.

This is a CODICIL to the last will and testament of me, _Sarah Duchess

Dowager of Marlborough_, which I duly made and published, bearing date

the eleventh day of August instant, and which will I do hereby ratify

and confirm in all respects.

Whereas I am possessed of several long annuities, amounting to the

yearly sum of two thousand six hundred pounds,

Now I bequeath the same to my executors, in _trust_ for the following

uses—

To James Stephens, 300_l._ yearly.

To Grace Bidley, 300_l._ yearly.

To Robert Macarty, Earl of Clancarty, the yearly sum of 1000_l._

To Elizabeth Arbor, the yearly sum of 200_l._

To Anne Patten, the yearly sum of 130_l._

To Olive Lofft, the yearly sum of 40_l._

To John Griffiths, the yearly sum of 200_l._

To Hannah Clarke, the yearly sum of 200_l._

To Jeremiah Lewis, the yearly sum of 50_l._

To John Dorset, the yearly sum of 50_l._

To each of my two chairmen, John Robins and George Humphreys, the yearly

sum of 20_l._

To Walter Jones, the yearly sum of 30_l._, and to each of my footmen

that shall continue in my service to the time of my decease, the yearly

sum of 10_l._

To Margaret and Catherine Garmes, the yearly sum each of 10_l._

The overplus of such long annuities to be paid to John Spencer.

I give to John Spencer ALL my gold and silver plate, seals, trinkets,

and small pieces of japan.

I give to the wife of John Spencer, the son of my said grandson, (if he

should live to be married,) my diamond pendants, which have three

brilliant drops to each, and all the rest of my jewels which I shall not

otherwise dispose of; and in case he die unmarried, I give the same to

his father.

I give to my granddaughter, Mary Duchess of Leeds, my diamond solitaire,

with the large brilliant diamond it hangs to; also the picture in water

colours of the late Duke of Marlborough, drawn by Lens.

I give to my daughter, Mary Duchess of Montagu, my gold snuff-box, that

has in it two pictures of her father, the Duke of Marlborough, when he

was a youth. Also a picture of her father covered with a large diamond,

and hung to a string of small pearls for a bracelet, and two enamelled

pictures for a bracelet of her sisters, Sunderland and Bridgewater.

I give to Thomas Duke of Leeds 3000_l._

I give to my niece, Frances Lady Dillon, 1000_l._

I give to Philip Earl of Chesterfield, out of the great regard I have

for his merit, and the infinite obligations I have received from him, my

best and largest brilliant diamond ring, and 20,000_l._

I give to William Pitt, Esq., the sum of 10,000_l._, upon account of his

merit in the noble defence he made for the support of the laws of

England, and to prevent the ruin of his country.

I give to Mr. Burroughs, Master in Chancery, 200_l._ to buy a ring.

I give to my executors 500_l._ each to buy them rings.

I give to the Earl of Clancarty, above what I have already given him,

1000_l._

Whereas John Earl of Stair owes me 1000_l._ upon bond, and his wife

bought me some things in France, but always declined telling me what

they cost, I desire him to pay my Lady Stair, and to accept the residue

of the 1000_l._, together with such other sums as I have lent to him.

I give to Juliana Countess of Burlington my bag of gold medals, and

1000_l._ to buy a ring, or something in remembrance of me.

I give to the Duchess of Devonshire my box of travelling plate.

I give to James Stephens, over and above what I have already given him,

the sum of 1300_l._, and as a further compensation for the great trouble

he will have as my acting executor, the yearly sum of 300_l._

To Grace Ridley I give, over and above what I have already given, the

sum of 15,000_l._; an enamelled picture of the Duke of Marlborough; a

little picture of the Duke in a locket, and my own picture by Sir

Godfrey Kneller, and my striking watch, which was the Duke of

Marlborough’s.

I give to Anne Ridley the sum of 3000_l._

I give to Mrs. Jane Pattison my striking watch, which formerly belonged

to her mistress, Lady Sunderland.

One half of my clothes and wearing apparel I give to Grace Ridley, and

the other half equally between Anne Patter and Olive Lofft.

I give to each of my chairmen 25_l._

I give to each of my servants one year’s wages.

I give to the poor of the town of Woodstock 300_l._

I desire that Mr. Glover and Mr. Mallet, who are to write the history of

the Duke of Marlborough, may have the use of all papers and letters

relating to the same found in any of my houses. And I desire that these

two gentlemen may write the said history, that it may be made publick to

the world how truly the late Duke of Marlborough wished that justice

should be done to all mankind, who, I am sure, left King James with

great regret, at a time when ’twas with hazard to himself; and if he had

been like the patriots of the present times, he might have been all that

an ambitious man could hope for, by assisting King James to settle

Popery in England.

I desire that no part of the said history may be in verse.

And I direct that the said history shall not be printed without the

approbation of the Earl of Chesterfield and my executors.

I give to Mr. Glover and Mr. Mallet 500_l._ each for writing the

history.

(Here follows a contingent provision for the younger children of Charles

Spencer, Duke of Marlborough.)

I give to Thomas Duke of Leeds my estate near St. Albans, and my

freehold at Romney Marsh, Kent.

I give to Philip Earl of Chesterfield my manor at Wimbledon, and also my

manors in Northampton and Surrey.

I give to the Earl of Clancarty my manors and lands in the county of

Buckingham.

To William Pitt I give my manor, &c., in the county of Buckingham, late

the estate of Richard Hampden, Esq.; and leasehold in Suffolk; and

lands, &c. in Northampton.

And to —— Bishop, Esq., my grandson, my manor, &c. in Oxford, with the

furniture, &c.

To Hugh Earl of Marchmont, my manor, &c. in Buckingham, late the estate

of Sir John Witteronge, Bart.; and also my manor, &c. in the same

county, late the estate of Sir Thomas Tyrrel.

To Thomas Lord Bishop of Oxford, my manor, &c. in Bedford.

To Beversham Filmer, Esq., my manors, &c. in Leicester and Northampton,

late the estates of Sir Thomas Cave.

To Dr. James Stephens, my estates, &c. in Berks and Huntingdon.

And all other undisposed of estates or effects to John Spencer, his

heirs, &c.

SARAH MARLBOROUGH.

Dated August 15th, 1744.

(Witnessed by)

SANDWICH.

GEO. HEATHCOTE.

HENRY MARSHALL.

RICHARD HOARE.

THE END.

-----

Footnote 1:

Royal and Noble Authors, art. Peterborough.

Footnote 2:

Pope’s Letters to Swift, p. 76.

Footnote 3:

Noble, vol. ii. p. 43.

Footnote 4:

The Earl married, first, Carey, daughter of Sir Alexander Frazer, and,

secondly, the accomplished Anastasia Robinson, the daughter of a

painter. The story of his lordship’s lovesuit to this lady shows at

once the licentiousness and the eccentricity of his character. Whilst

he admired the virtues of Miss Robinson, and her efforts in her

vocation as an opera singer and a teacher of music and Italian, to

support an aged father, he did not deem it beneath him to endeavour to

make her his mistress. His arts were unsuccessful, and Anastasia

became privately his wife. In 1735 it suited his fancy to proclaim his

marriage. Being at Bath, in the public rooms, a servant was ordered to

call out distinctly, “Lady Peterborough’s carriage waits;” on which

every lady of rank and respectability rose, and wished the new

Countess joy.—Granger, vol. ii. p. 45.

Footnote 5:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 4.

Footnote 6:

Lady M. W.’s Letters, vol. ii. p. 168.

Footnote 7:

Coxe, vol. i. p. 232.

Footnote 8:

Cunningham, b. vi. p. 328.

Footnote 9:

Noble, vol. ii. p. 36.

Footnote 10:

Boyer, App., p. 46.

Footnote 11:

Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 197.

Footnote 12:

Cunningham, b. vi. p. 328.

Footnote 13:

Boyer.

Footnote 14:

Walpole’s Letters, vol. ii. p. 401.

Footnote 15:

Coxe, vol. i. p. 284.

Footnote 16:

Cunningham, book vi. p. 350.

Footnote 17:

Conduct, p. 159.

Footnote 18:

Conduct, p. 141.

Footnote 19:

Burnet.

Footnote 20:

Conduct, p. 171.

Footnote 21:

Conduct, p. 172.

Footnote 22:

Coxe.

Footnote 23:

Cunningham, b. vi. p. 351.

Footnote 24:

Ibid.

Footnote 25:

Examiner, No. 26.

Footnote 26:

Boyer, p. 472.

Footnote 27:

Coxe, p. 280.

Footnote 28:

Coxe, p. 279.

Footnote 29:

Ibid.

Footnote 30:

Coxe, p. 294, and Cunningham.

Footnote 31:

Cunningham, b. vi. p. 369.

Footnote 32:

Conduct, p. 145.

Footnote 33:

Somerville, vol. i. p. 48.

Footnote 34:

Coxe, p. 295.

Footnote 35:

Conduct, p. 145.

Footnote 36:

Conduct, p. 156.

Footnote 37:

Burnet, vol. v. p. 157.

Footnote 38:

Conduct.

Footnote 39:

Burnet.

Footnote 40:

Coxe, vol. i. p. 239.

Footnote 41:

Cox, vol. i. p. 246.

Footnote 42:

Ibid.

Footnote 43:

Lediard, vol. i. p. 365.

Footnote 44:

As prisoners.

Footnote 45:

Cunningham, b. vii. p. 402.

Footnote 46:

Coxe, vol. i. p. 306.

Footnote 47:

Lediard.

Footnote 48:

Ibid.

Footnote 49:

Cunningham, p. 402.

Footnote 50:

History of Europe. Lediard. Coxe.

Footnote 51:

History of Europe. Lediard. Coxe.

Footnote 52:

Lediard, p. 478.

Footnote 53:

Cunningham, book viii. p. 442.

Footnote 54:

Conduct, p. 147.

Footnote 55:

Lediard. Cunningham.

Footnote 56:

Conduct, p. 156.

Footnote 57:

Conduct, p. 150.

Footnote 58:

Conduct, p. 155.

Footnote 59:

Cunningham, p. 456.

Footnote 60:

See Conduct. Somerville, chap. vi. p. 113.

Footnote 61:

Conduct, p. 159.

Footnote 62:

Cunningham, p. 458.

Footnote 63:

Cunningham.

Footnote 64:

Lediard, vol. iii.

Footnote 65:

Cunningham, b. viii. p. 461.

Footnote 66:

Lediard, vol. ii. p. 3.

Footnote 67:

Cunningham, p. 452.

Footnote 68:

Conduct, p. 161. Cunningham. Lediard.

Footnote 69:

Conduct, p. 170.

Footnote 70:

Ibid. p. 165–167.

Footnote 71:

Conduct, p. 173.

Footnote 72:

Ibid. p. 174.

Footnote 73:

Coxe, p. 515.

Footnote 74:

He was made Lord Keeper in 1705, and Lord Chancellor in 1707.

Footnote 75:

MSS. Letters British Museum, Coxe Papers, 45, 4to. p. 2.

Footnote 76:

Conduct, p. 171.

Footnote 77:

Ibid. p. 176.

Footnote 78:

Conduct, 161.

Footnote 79:

Other Side, p. 259.

Footnote 80:

Ibid. p. 261.

Footnote 81:

Conduct, p. 162.

Footnote 82:

Other Side, p. 261.

Footnote 83:

Cunningham, b. ix. p. 77.

Footnote 84:

Cunningham, p. 77.

Footnote 85:

Cunningham, p. 55, and Biographia Britannica.

Footnote 86:

Conduct.

Footnote 87:

Conduct, p. 177–181.

Footnote 88:

Lediard, vol. ii. p. 2.

Footnote 89:

Letters on the Study of History. Letter IV.

Footnote 90:

Conduct, p. 176.

Footnote 91:

In her letter (supposed to Bishop Burnet) endorsed “An answer to the

person that asked what first stuck with me,” in the Coxe MSS. the

Duchess calls Mr. Hill “a merchant, or projector,” who was in some way

related to Mr. Harley, and by profession an Anabaptist.—Coxe MSS. vol.

xlv. p. 11.

Footnote 92:

Conduct.

Footnote 93:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlv. p. 11.

Footnote 94:

Ibid.

Footnote 95:

Political pamphlet, entitled a “Continuation of the Review of a late

Treatise,” &c. London, 1741, p. 31.

Footnote 96:

MSS. B. M. Coxe Papers, vol. xliv.

Footnote 97:

Conduct, p. 183.

Footnote 98:

Mr. Masham was first page of honour to Queen Anne and to Prince

George, and also equerry to the latter. In 1710 he was preferred to

the command of a regiment of horse, and advanced to the rank of

brigadier-general. At the famous creation in 1711, he was made a peer,

by the title of Lord Masham of Oates, in the county of Essex. By his

lady, who died in 1734, he had three sons and two daughters. Anne, his

lordship’s eldest daughter, married, in 1726, Henry Hoare, grandson of

Sir Richard Hoare, formerly Lord Mayor of London.—_London Chronicle._

Footnote 99:

Conduct, p. 181.

Footnote 100:

MS. Letter to Mr. Hutchinson, B. M.

Footnote 101:

Conduct, p. 185.

Footnote 102:

Coxe, Papers vol. xlv. p. 13.

Footnote 103:

Conduct, p. 190.

Footnote 104:

Other Side of the Question, p. 311.

Footnote 105:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 63.

Footnote 106:

Ibid. p. 105.

Footnote 107:

MS. Letter, British Museum.

Footnote 108:

Preface to Lord Wharncliffe’s Ed. of Lady M. W.’s Letters, p. 74.

Footnote 109:

Conduct, p. 197.

Footnote 110:

Cunningham, b. ix. p. 82.

Footnote 111:

Lediard, vol. ii. p. 5.

Footnote 112:

Other Side, p. 316.

Footnote 113:

B. ix. p. 80.

Footnote 114:

Conduct, p. 70.

Footnote 115:

Lediard.

Footnote 116:

Conduct, p. 191.

Footnote 117:

Conduct, p. 202.

Footnote 118:

Coxe Papers, vol. xliv.

Footnote 119:

London Chronicle, 1763.

Footnote 120:

MS.

Footnote 121:

See Appendix.

Footnote 122:

Conduct.

Footnote 123:

Conduct.

Footnote 124:

Coxe, book i. p. 377.

Footnote 125:

Burnet, vol. v. p. 358.

Footnote 126:

Coxe, p. 370–372.

Footnote 127:

Correspondence, vol. i. p. 83.

Footnote 128:

Ibid. p. 84.

Footnote 129:

Cunningham, b. ix. p. 141.

Footnote 130:

Cunningham, vol. x. p. 132.

Footnote 131:

Burnet, p. 373.

Footnote 132:

Burnet.

Footnote 133:

See Lives of St. John Lord Bolingbroke, by Goldsmith. Biog.

Britannica, &c.

Footnote 134:

Cunningham.

Footnote 135:

Letters on History.

Footnote 136:

See Lives of Bolingbroke—Coxe, Burnet, Lediard.

Footnote 137:

Lediard, vol. ii. p. 9.

Footnote 138:

Lediard, vol. ii. p. 9.

Footnote 139:

Burnet, b. v. p. 384.

Footnote 140:

Conduct, p. 214.

Footnote 141:

Ibid. 216.

Footnote 142:

Ibid.

Footnote 143:

Conduct, p. 222.

Footnote 144:

Conduct, p. 219.

Footnote 145:

Aug. 19, 1708.

Footnote 146:

Conduct, p. 222.

Footnote 147:

Preserved in the Coxe MSS. B. M., and given in the Appendix to this

volume.

Footnote 148:

Burnet, vol. iv. p. 247.

Footnote 149:

Conduct. Also Narrative, by the Duchess, of the events which took

place after the Prince of Denmark’s death. Coxe, vol. iv. p. 234.

Footnote 150:

Macauley. History of England from the Revolution, p. 218.

Footnote 151:

Cunningham.

Footnote 152:

Cunningham, book ii. p. 300.

Footnote 153:

MS. Letter to Mr. Hutchinson. This curious and natural account of an

amusing scene is contained in a manuscript Vindication of the Duchess,

addressed to Mr. Hutchinson, preserved in the Coxe MSS. in the British

Museum, and has never before been quoted or published.—See Coxe

Papers, vol. xliv. p. 2. “The good-nature yet weakness of Anne’s

character is strongly exemplified in the details in the text.”

Footnote 154:

Lady Hyde, afterwards Countess of Rochester, from whom the Duchess

states herself to have received many affronts on the back-stairs.—Coxe

MSS. vol. 44.

Footnote 155:

The Duchess of Somerset, wife of the proud Duke of Somerset, so called

from his excessive pride of rank and ostentation, was a Percy; and, as

such, considered to merit precedence, and great deference, both by her

husband and by the Duchess of Marlborough, who always called her “the

great lady.” There seems to have been a friendly understanding between

the two Duchesses, for Mr. Maynwaring, in one of his letters to the

Duchess of Marlborough, says, “I am glad the Duke and Duchess of

Somerset were to dine with you, for notwithstanding the faults of the

one, and the spirit of Percy blood in the other, I think they both

naturally love and esteem you very much.”—Coxe MSS. vol. xli. p. 248.

Footnote 156:

MS. Letter. Coxe Papers, p. 44.

Footnote 157:

Conduct, p. 230.

Footnote 158:

Conduct, p. 230.

Footnote 159:

Cunningham, b. xii. p. 279.

Footnote 160:

Cunningham, b. xii. p. 279.

Footnote 161:

Cunningham, b. xii. p. 279.

Footnote 162:

Cunningham, book xii. p. 282.

Footnote 163:

Conduct, from p. 238 to 244.

Footnote 164:

See another account of this scene, in Private Correspondence of the

Duke of Marlborough, vol. i. p. 295.

Footnote 165:

Conduct, p. 244.

Footnote 166:

Burnet’s History, b. iv. vol. vi. p. 314.

Footnote 167:

Biographia Britannica, art. Gilbert Burnet.

Footnote 168:

Biographia Britannica.

Footnote 169:

The Countess de Soissons was one among many ladies of rank, and some

belonging to the court, who, merely to satisfy curiosity, ever

powerful in female hearts, visited a woman of the name of Voisin, who

carried on a traffic in poisons, and was convicted by the _Chambre

Ardente_, and burnt alive on the twenty-second of February, 1680. This

woman kept a list of all who had been dupes to her imposture; and in

it were found the names of the Countess de Soissons, her sister the

Duchess de Bouillon, and Marshal de Luxembourg. In order to avoid the

disgrace of imprisonment without a fair trial, the Countess fled to

Flanders; her sister was saved by the interest of her friends; and the

Marshal, after some months’ imprisonment in the Bastile, was declared

innocent.—_See_ _Beckman’s History of Inventions_, vol. i. p. 94, 95.

Footnote 170:

Burnet, Hist. p. 290.

Footnote 171:

Conduct, p. 254.

Footnote 172:

Cunningham, Burnet, Tindal.

Footnote 173:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 317.

Footnote 174:

Conduct, p. 260.

Footnote 175:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 343.

Footnote 176:

Ibid. p. 351.

Footnote 177:

Private Correspondence, p. 366.

Footnote 178:

Conduct, p. 261.

Footnote 179:

See Cibber’s Apology. Lady M. Wortley Montague, preface.

Footnote 180:

Swift’s Letters, xiii p. 47.

Footnote 181:

Examiner, No. xvii.

Footnote 182:

Conduct, p. 263.

Footnote 183:

Conduct, p. 273.

Footnote 184:

Conduct, p. 279.

Footnote 185:

Conduct, p. 282.

Footnote 186:

Alluding, probably, to the custom of touching for the King’s evil.

Footnote 187:

Cunningham, b. xix. p. 348.

Footnote 188:

Conduct, p. 269. See Appendix.

Footnote 189:

Ibid. p. 270.

Footnote 190:

Coxe, MS. vol. xliii.

Footnote 191:

Lediard, p. 283.

Footnote 192:

Lediard, p. 278.

Footnote 193:

See Coxe—Lediard—Biog. Brit.

Footnote 194:

Warton’s Essay on Pope, p. 119.

Footnote 195:

See Archdeacon Coxe.

Footnote 196:

The Duchess herself remarks it, as an extraordinary occurrence, that

her husband should, even upon a most trying occasion, be betrayed into

anger. When he received from Queen Anne the letter containing his

dismissal, he flung it, she says, “in a passion,” into the fire. Coxe,

MS. vol. xliii.

Footnote 197:

Biog. Britannica.

Footnote 198:

Swift’s Works, vol. xiii. p. 36.

Footnote 199:

See Swift’s Letter.

Footnote 200:

Lediard, vol. ii. p. 399.

Footnote 201:

Lediard, p. 391.

Footnote 202:

See Appendix.

Footnote 203:

Lord Cowper’s Diary.

Footnote 204:

Ibid. vol. iv. p. 229.

Footnote 205:

Somerville, chap. xxiii. p. 125.

Footnote 206:

Somerville, p. 554, 555.

Footnote 207:

Sheridan’s Swift, p. 143.

Footnote 208:

Conduct.

Footnote 209:

Coxe MSS. vol. xliv. p. 2.

Footnote 210:

Swift’s Correspondence, vol. xv. p. 111.

Footnote 211:

Swift’s Correspondence, vol. xv. p. 73.

Footnote 212:

Ibid. p. 76.

Footnote 213:

Swift’s Correspondence, vol. xv. p. 77.

Footnote 214:

Swift’s Letters.

Footnote 215:

Coxe, p. 297.

Footnote 216:

Letter of Erasmus Lewes to Swift, vol. xv. p. 108.

Footnote 217:

Boyer, p. 714.

Footnote 218:

Boyer. Arbuthnot’s Letter to Swift, vol. xv.

Footnote 219:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 147.

Footnote 220:

Her early medical attendant, and that of her family, Dr. Ratcliffe,

the singular benefactor of Oxford, was not present at her sick-bed. He

died soon afterwards. This humorist, and shrewd physician, had

offended her Majesty some time previously, by saying that her

complaint was nothing but “_vapours_.” Possibly he was so far right,

that repose, not medicine, was what the poor, harassed Queen required.

Dr. Ratcliffe had been sent for to Prince George by the Queen’s

express desire. On that occasion he had given her Majesty no hopes;

telling her that however common it might be for surgeons to use

caustics in cases of burning and scalding, “it was irregular for

physicians to expel watery humours by the same element.” To this

dogmatic assertion he added a promise that the dying Prince should

have an easy passage out of this world, since he had been so “tampered

with,” he could not live more than six days.—_Ingram’s Memorials of

Oxford_, vol. iii. p. 8.

For some further notice of this extraordinary man, see the concluding

portion of this volume.

Footnote 221:

Somerville, Appendix II p. 656.

Footnote 222:

Lediard, p. 447.

Footnote 223:

Coxe, vol. vi. p. 296.

Footnote 224:

Ibid. p. 305.

Footnote 225:

Lediard, p. 453.

Footnote 226:

Coxe, p. 6. 308.

Footnote 227:

Macauley. Lediard.

Footnote 228:

Macaulay. Chesterfield.

Footnote 229:

Coxe, vol. iii. p. 610.

Footnote 230:

A portion of that task, namely, her letter to Mr. Hutchison, she is

stated, in a note in Dr. Coxe’s handwriting, to have begun during her

residence abroad.

Footnote 231:

The principal of Sir J. Vanburgh’s works, besides Castle Howard and

Blenheim, were Eastleving, in Dorsetshire; King’s Weston, near

Bristol; the Opera House, and St. John’s Church, Westminster—not to

mention his own residence at Whitehall, of which Swift writes—

“At length they in the rubbish spy

A thing resembling a goose-pie.”

Footnote 232:

Swift’s pun on this occasion was, that he might now “build houses.”

Footnote 233:

Hist. Vanburgh’s House, 1708.

Footnote 234:

This anecdote is pronounced by Mr. D’Israeli, in his “Curiosities of

Literature” (1823), to be a mere invention.

Footnote 235:

Vanburgh died in 1726.

Footnote 236:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 76.

Footnote 237:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 76.

Footnote 238:

Coxe Papers.

Footnote 239:

Coxe Papers. See Appendix.

Footnote 240:

Coxe Papers, vol. xlvi. p. 148.

Footnote 241:

This marriage, unhappily for the Duke, was childless, thus

disappointing his hopes of being able proudly to deduce the origin of

his posterity from the great Marlborough.—Coxe Papers, vol. xlvi. p.

148.

Footnote 242:

This letter, together with the rest of this curious correspondence, is

to be seen in the Appendix.

Footnote 243:

Coxe MSS.

Footnote 244:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 148.

Footnote 245:

Ibid. p. 145.

Footnote 246:

See Swift’s Letters.

Footnote 247:

Ibid. vol. xiv. p. 131.

Footnote 248:

Swift’s Letters, vol. xiv. p. 90.

Footnote 249:

Coxe, vol. vi. quarto, p. 615.

Footnote 250:

See Cunningham and others.

Footnote 251:

See Appendix.

Footnote 252:

Coxe, p. 361.

Footnote 253:

See Coxe, p. 619, and also Lord Sunderland’s answer.

Footnote 254:

Coxe, vol. iii. p. 645.

Footnote 255:

Hogarth personated the Ghost of Brutus, but, being wholly deficient in

memory, he was unable to commit to memory the few lines which

constituted his part. The verses he was to deliver were therefore

pasted in very large letters on the outside of an illuminated lantern,

so that he could read them as he came on the stage, with that

appropriate implement in his hand.

Footnote 256:

Biographical Dict., Art. Hoadly.

Footnote 257:

Coxe.

Footnote 258:

The play-bill of “All for Love; or the World Well Lost,” has been

given at length by Dr. Coxe. It runs as follows:

_Marc Anthony_, Captain Fish, Page of the Duchess.

_Ventidius_, Old Mr. Jennings.

_Sarapion, the High Priest_, Miss Cairnes.

_Alexis_, Mrs. La Vie.

_Cleopatra_, Lady Charlotte Macarthy.

_Octavia_, Lady Anne Spencer.

_Children of Marc Anthony_, Lady Anne Egerton, Lady Diana Spencer.

(Scene, the Bow-window Room.)

(Great screens for changing scenes.)

Footnote 259:

Coxe.

Footnote 260:

His second wife. He married first a Miss Talbot, niece of the Duke of

Shrewsbury.—Burke’s Peerage.

Footnote 261:

Coxe.

Footnote 262:

Biographia Britannica.

Footnote 263:

Biographia Britannica.

Footnote 264:

Macauley, p. 290.

Footnote 265:

Coxe.

Footnote 266:

Anecdotes of Lady M. W., edited by Lord Wharncliffe, vol. i. p. 74.

Footnote 267:

Coxe, vol. i. p. 625.

Footnote 268:

Macauley, p. 308.

Footnote 269:

Coxe.

Footnote 270:

Biographia Britannica.

Footnote 271:

Coxe.

Footnote 272:

Political and Literary Anecdotes of his Own Time, by Dr. King.

Footnote 273:

Scott’s Life of Swift.

Footnote 274:

Lord Chesterfield’s Characters.

Footnote 275:

Lord Chesterfield. Horace Walpole.

Footnote 276:

Such was also the case even with the great Lord Clarendon, after many

years of exile. See Mr. James’s Life of Louis Quatorze, vol. iii.

Footnote 277:

Coxe, p. 629.

Footnote 278:

Mem. of Lord Walpole. Coxe, p. 8.

Footnote 279:

The origin of Mr. James Craggs is said by Lady Mary W. Montague to be

derived from a very low source. His father was footman to the Duchess

of Norfolk, and a footman of the old school, who managed his

mistress’s intrigues as well as other household affairs.—Lady M. W.

M.’s Letters. Hence the epigram in Horace Walpole’s Letters.

Footnote 280:

Coxe, Appendix.

Footnote 281:

Life of Lord Walpole, p. 20.

Footnote 282:

Horace Walpole, Reminiscences.

Footnote 283:

For the rest of this curious letter, see Appendix. It was kindly

pointed out to me by Deputy Holmes, Esq. keeper of the Manuscripts,

British Museum. That gentleman found it crumpled up among Dr. Coxe’s

papers, while he was arranging those manuscripts in their present

convenient form. To this letter there is neither date nor address: on

the back it is endorsed, “From the Duke of Marlborough;” Mr. Holmes

surmises, in the handwriting of Lord Godolphin. Archdeacon Coxe has

not noticed the Duke’s perplexity on the point expressed in this

letter.

Footnote 284:

See Opinions.

Footnote 285:

Horace Walpole, Reminiscences.

Footnote 286:

Coxe, p. 646.

Footnote 287:

Coxe, vol. vi. octavo, p. 646.

Footnote 288:

“Our bishops,” says the Duchess, writing of the Princess, whose

condescension she had so greatly extolled, “are now about to employ

hands to write the finest character that ever was heard of Queen

Caroline; who, as it is no treason, I freely own that I am glad she is

dead. Upon her great understanding and goodness there come out

nauseous panegyrics every day, that make one sick, so full of nonsense

and lies. There is one very remarkable from a Dr. Clarke, in order to

have the first bishoprick that falls, and I dare say he will have it,

though there is something extremely ridiculous in the panegyric; for,

after he has given her the most perfect character that ever any woman

had, or can have, he allows that she had sacrificed her reputation to

the great and the many, to show her duty to the King and her love to

the country. These are the clergyman’s words exactly, which allows she

did wrong things, but it was to please the King,—which is condemning

him. I suppose he must mean some good she did to her own country, for

I know of none she did in England, unless taking from the public

deserves a panegyric.”—Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 169.

Duchess of Marlborough’s Opinions.

Footnote 289:

See Dr. Coxe, p. 648.

Footnote 290:

Coxe, p. 649.

Footnote 291:

Newspapers of the day.

Footnote 292:

Coxe Papers, vol. xli. p. 76.

Footnote 293:

Warton’s Essay on Pope, vol. ii. p. 303.

Footnote 294:

Swift’s Correspondence, vol. xv. p. 236.

Footnote 295:

Biographia.

Footnote 296:

London Chronicle, November 21, 1758.

Footnote 297:

His avarice has been attributed greatly to the Duchess’s influence.

Footnote 298:

Collins’s Baronage, vol. ii.

Footnote 299:

See Lady M. W. Montague’s Letters.

Footnote 300:

Coxe, p. 653.

Footnote 301:

Coxe, p. 653.

Footnote 302:

See some curious letters in the Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 70.

Footnote 303:

Burke’s Extinct Peerage, art. Coningsby.

Footnote 304:

By Frances, daughter of the Earl of Ranelagh.

Footnote 305:

Oct. 8, 1722. The Duke died June 16, 1722.

Footnote 306:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 70.

Footnote 307:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 71.

Footnote 308:

Coxe.

Footnote 309:

Private Correspondence, p. 206. Letter from Mr. Maynwaring to the

Duchess.

Footnote 310:

Ibid. See also Horace Walpole’s Letters.

Footnote 311:

Burke’s Peerage, art. Somerset.

Footnote 312:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 147.

Footnote 313:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 147.

Footnote 314:

Coxe, p. 656.

Footnote 315:

Coxe.

Footnote 316:

Ibid.

Footnote 317:

H. Walpole’s Reminiscences.

Footnote 318:

Warton on Pope.

Footnote 319:

Warton on Pope, p. 141.

Footnote 320:

Macauley.

Footnote 321:

Chesterfield’s Characters.

Footnote 322:

Chesterfield, Smollett, Tindal, &c.

Footnote 323:

See Macauley, p. 225.

Footnote 324:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 161.

Footnote 325:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 152.

Footnote 326:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 495.

Footnote 327:

Private Correspondence, p. 495.

Footnote 328:

Macaulay, p. 370.

Footnote 329:

Private Correspondence, p. 461.

Footnote 330:

Private Correspondence, p. 465.

Footnote 331:

Letter from Lord Godolphin to the Duchess. Private Correspondence, p.

479.

Footnote 332:

Private Correspondence, p. 467.

Footnote 333:

Coxe MSS. vol. xliii. p. 123.

Footnote 334:

Private Correspondence, p. 472, 473.

Footnote 335:

Burke’s Peerage.

Footnote 336:

Horace Walpole, Reminiscences.

Footnote 337:

Chesterfield. Annual Register. Collins’ Baronage.

Footnote 338:

Chesterfield’s Characters.

Footnote 339:

Note in Chesterfield’s Characters, p. 50.

Footnote 340:

Lord Wharncliffe, vol. i. p. 2.

Footnote 341:

Ibid.

Footnote 342:

Collins’s Baronage.

Footnote 343:

Chesterfield.

Footnote 344:

Lady M. W. Montague.

Footnote 345:

This letter is given literally as it is written, without any

alteration of grammar or punctuation.—Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 148.

Footnote 346:

Letters to Sir Horace Mann, vol. iii. p. 286.

Footnote 347:

Letters to Sir Horace Mann, vol. ii. p. 144.

Footnote 348:

Dallaway’s Memoirs of Lady M. W. Lord Wharncliffe. Edition of Lady M.

W.

Footnote 349:

Horace Walpole mentions this anecdote of Lady Bateman, but a later

account specifies Lady Anne Egerton as the heroine of the blackened

picture.

Footnote 350:

Those who have read the novels of Richardson, faithful delineations of

manners, cannot but recal to mind the descriptions given of parental

authority, and of filial fear, by that prolix, but, in some points,

incomparable novelist.

Footnote 351:

Coxe MSS., vol. iv.

Footnote 352:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 103.

Footnote 353:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 100–102.

Footnote 354:

Memoirs of the Life of Whiston, p. 102.

Footnote 355:

Private Correspondence, vol. i. p. 6.

Footnote 356:

Lord Wharncliffe, vol. i. p. 76.

Footnote 357:

Life of Colley Cibber, p. 66.

Footnote 358:

Life of Colley Cibber, p. 461.

Footnote 359:

Such was her excellence in the “Provoked Husband,” that the managers

made her a present of fifty guineas above her agreement, which was

only a verbal one; “for they knew,” says Cibber, “that she was

incapable of deserting them for another stage.” One of the many good

traits in the character of this erring woman was her refusing to

receive her salary, when disabled by illness from performing, although

her agreement entitled her to receive it.—Life of Colley Cibber, p.

291.

Footnote 360:

It was not situated exactly on the spot, but near to the summer-house,

which has been mentioned in p. 10. vol. i. of this work. The

summer-house is also pulled down.

Footnote 361:

In Holywell-house, the Dowager Lady Spencer, mother of the beautiful

Duchess of Devonshire, long resided. Her ladyship received among her

guests the late antiquary, —— Browne, Esq. of St. Albans, whose death,

at a very advanced age, took place very recently. The authoress had

the honour of conversing with this venerable antiquary, but could not

learn from him that there were any particular traces in Holywell-house

of the Duchess or her children, though there are several, as Mr.

Browne informed her, of the Spencer and Cavendish family, more

especially of the present Duke of Devonshire, whose visits to Holywell

in childhood were frequent.

Footnote 362:

From the catalogue, Holywell-house must have been very commodious; but

the rooms, though numerous, were not large. The authoress saw it on

the eve of its destruction, and, not being at all aware of its

peculiar interest to her, was struck by its massive though not

picturesque appearance. It commanded a fine view of St. Alban’s Abbey.

Footnote 363:

On this occasion the churchwardens of Kingston paid “twenty pence” for

mending the ways when the Queen went from Wimbledon to Nonsuch.

Footnote 364:

The survey taken of it by order of parliament, in 1649, describes it

minutely, and is very curious. It is printed in the Archæologia of the

Society of Antiquaries, vol. x. p. 399, 8vo., from the original in the

Augmentation Office.

Footnote 365:

There is a view of this, the Duchess’s house, in the fifth volume of

the “Vitruvius Britannicus.”

Footnote 366:

The following account, supplied by William Upcott, Esq., from some one

of the daily papers of that day, is curious. “Woodstock, June 19.

Yesterday being Monday, about six o’clock in the evening, was laid the

first stone of the Duke of Marlborough’s house, by Mr. Vanbrugge, and

then seven gentlemen gave it a stroke with a hammer, and threw down

each of them a guinea; Sir Thomas Wheate was the first, Dr. Bouchel

the second, Mr. Vanbrugge the third; I know not the rest. There were

several sorts of musick; three morris dances; one of young fellows,

one of maidens, and one of old beldames. There were about a hundred

buckets, bowls, and pans, filled with wine, punch, cakes, and ale.

From my lord’s house all went to the Town-hall, where plenty of sack,

claret, cakes, &c., were prepared for the gentry and better sort; and

under the Cross eight barrels of ale, with abundance of cakes, were

placed for the common people. The stone laid by Mr. Vanbrugge was

eight square, finely polished, about eighteen inches over, and upon it

were these words inlayed in pewter—_In memory of the battel of

Blenheim, June 8, 1705, Anna Regina._”

Footnote 367:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi.

Footnote 368:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 8.

Footnote 369:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 8.

Footnote 370:

In the possession of William Upcott, Esq.

Footnote 371:

The word is expressed thus + in the original letter.

Footnote 372:

Coxe MSS., vol. xli p. 14.

Footnote 373:

For the correspondence on this subject, hitherto unpublished, see

Appendix.

Footnote 374:

Appendix.

Footnote 375:

Coxe MSS.

Footnote 376:

Coxe Papers.

Footnote 377:

Coxe, p. 642.

Footnote 378:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 74.

Footnote 379:

Coxe.

Footnote 380:

Newspapers. Anecdote supplied by W. Upcott, Esq.

Footnote 381:

Letter from Vanburgh to Tonson. D’Israeli’s Curiosities of Literature.

1823.

Footnote 382:

Letter to Mr. Hutchinson, Coxe MSS.

Footnote 383:

Life of Sarah Duchess of Marlborough. Published in 1745.

Footnote 384:

Walpole’s Reminiscences, p. 293.

Footnote 385:

Reminiscences.

Footnote 386:

Chesterfield’s Characters.

Footnote 387:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii.

Footnote 388:

Granger’s Biog. Hist. of Great Britain. Art. Jennings.

Footnote 389:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 179.

Footnote 390:

Life of Sarah Duchess of Marlborough.

Footnote 391:

Macauley.

Footnote 392:

Lord Chesterfield.

Footnote 393:

Biographical Dictionary.

Footnote 394:

Manuscript Notes in the copy of the Duchess’s Opinions in the British

Museum.

Footnote 395:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 123.

Footnote 396:

He conducted the paper called the “Champion.” His sister Sarah, a

literary character also, was the intimate friend of Dr. Hoadly.

Possibly, from her name, she may have been a god-daughter of the

Duchess.

Footnote 397:

Reminiscences, p. 308.

Footnote 398:

Letters of Walpole, vol. i. p. 42.

Footnote 399:

Private Correspondence. Life of the Duchess.

Footnote 400:

Manuscript Notes to her Opinions.

Footnote 401:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 168.

Footnote 402:

Private Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 209.

Footnote 403:

Coxe. Private Correspondence, &c.

Footnote 404:

Life of Sarah Duchess of Marlborough.

Footnote 405:

Life of Sarah Duchess of Marlborough.

Footnote 406:

The details of her grievances are to be found in the Appendix.

Footnote 407:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 123.

Footnote 408:

Coxe MSS.

Footnote 409:

As her early and only biographer expresses it, at her house at the

Friery, St. James’s. Friery Passage was formerly close to

Marlborough-house.

Footnote 410:

Coxe MSS.

Footnote 411:

See Appendix.

Footnote 412:

Coxe MSS., vol. xv. p. 151.

Footnote 413:

Coxe MSS., vol. xli. p. 14.

Footnote 414:

Blank in manuscript.

Footnote 415:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 28.

Footnote 416:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 56.

Footnote 417:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 127.

Footnote 418:

Coxe MSS., vol xli. p. 25.

Footnote 419:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 24.

Footnote 420:

Coxe MSS., vol. xli. p. 31.

Footnote 421:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 29.

Footnote 422:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 76.

Footnote 423:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 68.

Footnote 424:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvi. p. 142.

Footnote 425:

Coxe MSS. vol., xlvi. p. 148.

Footnote 426:

Coxe MSS., vol. xv. p. 150.

Footnote 427:

Coxe MSS., vol. xlvii. p. 8.

Footnote 428:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 63.

Footnote 429:

Ibid. vol. xliii. p. 9.

Footnote 430:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 132.

Footnote 431:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 133.

Footnote 432:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 134.

Footnote 433:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii, p. 136.

Footnote 434:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 142.

Footnote 435:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 144.

Footnote 436:

Coxe MSS., vol. xliii. p. 147.

Footnote 437:

This letter is probably in continuation of the Duchess of

Marlborough’s to the Duke of Newcastle, of August 1, 1735.—See vol.

ii. p. 476.

LONDON:

IBOTSON AND PALMER, PRINTERS, SAVOY STREET, STRAND.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES

1. Silently corrected typographical errors and variations in spelling.

2. Archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings retained as printed.

3. Enclosed italics font in _underscores_.

Memoirs of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, and of the Court of Queen Anne Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 19 / 19 章