CHAPTER X

AGRICULTURE, INDUSTRY, AND TRADE

It was the royal desire that New France should some day become a

powerful and prosperous agricultural colony, providing the motherland

with an acceptable addition to its food supply. To this end large

tracts of land were granted upon most liberal terms to incoming

settlers, and every effort was made to get these acres cultivated.

Encouragement and coercion were alike given a trial. Settlers who did

well were given official recognition, sometimes even to the extent of

rank in the _noblesse_. On the other hand those who left their lands

uncleared were repeatedly threatened with the revocation of their

land-titles, and in some cases their holdings were actually taken

away. From the days of the earliest settlement down to the eve of the

English conquest, the officials of both the Church and the State

never ceased to use their best endeavors in the interests of colonial

agriculture.

Yet with all this official interest and encouragement agricultural

development was slow. Much of the land on both the north and the south

shores of the St. Lawrence was heavily timbered, and the work of

clearing proved tedious. It was estimated that an industrious settler,

working by himself, could clear not more than one superficial _arpent_

in a whole season. So slowly did the work make progress, in fact, that

in 1712, after fifty years of royal paternalism, the cultivable area

of New France amounted to only 150,000 _arpents_, and at the close

of the French dominion in 1760 it was scarcely more than twice that

figure,--in other words, about five _arpents_ for each head of

population.

While industry and trade, particularly the Indian trade, took the

attention and interest of a considerable portion in the population of

New France, agriculture was from first to last the vocation of the

great majority. The census of 1695 showed more than seventy-five per

cent of the people living on the farms of the colony and this ratio

was almost exactly maintained, nearly sixty years later, when the

census of 1754 was compiled. This population was scattered along both

banks of the St. Lawrence from a point well below Quebec to the region

surrounding Montreal. Most of the farms fronted on the river so that

every habitant had a few _arpents_ of marshy land for hay, a tract of

cleared upland for ploughing, and an area extending to the rear which

might be turned into meadow or left uncleared to supply him with

firewood.

Wheat and maize were the great staples, although large quantities

of oats, barley, and peas were also grown. The wheat was invariably

spring-sown, and the yield averaged from eight to twelve

hundredweights per _arpent_, or from ten to fourteen bushels per acre.

Most of the wheat was made into flour at the seigneurial mills and

was consumed in the colony, but shipments were also made with

fair regularity to France, to the West Indies, and for a time to

Louisbourg. In 1736 the exports of wheat amounted to nearly 100,000

bushels, and in the year following the banner harvest of 1741 this

total was nearly doubled. The price which the habitant got for wheat

at Quebec ranged normally from two to four _livres_ per hundredweight

(about thirty to sixty cents per bushel) depending upon the harvests

in the colony and the safety with which wheat could be shipped to

France, which, again, hinged upon the fact whether France and England

were at peace or at war. Indian corn was not exported to any large

extent, but many cargoes of dried peas were sent abroad, and

occasionally there were small shipments of oats and beans.

There was also a considerable production of hemp, flax, and tobacco,

but not for export in any large quantity. The tobacco grown in the

colony was coarse and ill-flavored. It was smoked by both the habitant

and the Indian because it was cheap; but Brazilian tobacco was greatly

preferred by those who could afford to buy it, and large quantities

of this were brought in. The French Government frowned upon

tobacco-growing in New France, believing, as Colbert wrote to Talon in

1672, that any such policy would be prejudicial to the interests of

the French colonies in the tropical zones which were much better

adapted to this branch of cultivation.

Cattle raising made substantial progress, and the King urged the

Sovereign Council to prohibit the slaughter of cattle so that the

herds might keep on growing; but the stock was not of a high standard,

but undersized, of mongrel breed, and poorly cared for. Sheep raising,

despite the brisk demand for wool, made slow headway. Most of the wool

needed in the colony had to be brought from France, and the demand was

great because so much woolen clothing was required for winter use. The

keeping of poultry was, of course, another branch of husbandry. The

habitants were fond of horses; even the poorest managed to keep two or

three, which was a wasteful policy as there was no work for the horses

to do during nearly half the year. Fodder, however, was abundant and

cost nothing, as each habitant obtained from the flats along the

river all that he could cut and carry away. This marsh hay was not of

superior quality, but it at least served to carry the horses and stock

through the winter.

The methods of agriculture were beyond question slovenly and crude.

Catalogne, the engineer whom the authorities commissioned to make an

agricultural census of the colony, ventured the opinion that, if

the fields of France were cultivated as the farms of Canada were,

three-quarters of the French people would starve. Rotation of crops

was practically unknown, and fertilization of the land was rare,

although the habitant frequently burned the stubble before putting

the plough to his fields. From time to time a part of each farm was

allowed to lie fallow, but such fallow fields were left unploughed and

soon grew so rank with weeds that the soil really got no rest at all.

All the ploughing was done in the spring, and it was not very well

done at that, for the land was ploughed in ridges which left much

waste between the furrows. Too often the seed became poor, as a result

of the habitant using seed from his own crops year after year until

it became run out. Most of the cultivated land was high and dry and

needed no artificial drainage. Even where the water lay on the land

late in the spring, however, there was rarely an attempt, as Peter

Kalm in his _Travels_ remarks, to drain it off. The habitant had

patience in greater measure than industry, and he was always ready to

wait for nature to do his work. Everybody depended for his implements

largely upon his own workmanship, so that the tools of agriculture

were of poor construction. The cultivation of even a few _arpents_

required a great deal of manual drudgery. On the other hand, the land

of New France was fertile, and every one could have plenty of it

for the asking. Kalm thought it quite as good as the average in the

English colonies and far better than most arable land in his own

Scandinavia.

Why, then, did French-Canadian agriculture, despite the warm official

encouragement given to it, make such relatively meager progress? There

are several reasons for its backwardness. The long winters, which

developed in the habitant an inveterate disposition to idleness,

afford the clue to one of them. A general aversion to unremitting

manual toil was one of the colony's besetting sins. Notwithstanding

the small per capita acreage, accordingly, there was a continual

complaint that not enough labor could be had to work the farms. Women

and children were pressed into service in the busy seasons. Yet the

colony abounded in idle men, and mendicancy at one time assumed such

proportions as to require the enforcement of stringent penalties. The

authorities were partly to blame for the development of this trait,

for upon the slightest excuse they took the habitant from his daily

routine and set him to help with warlike expeditions against the

Indians and the English, or called him to build roads or to repair the

fortifications. And the lure of the fur trade, which drew the most

vigorous young men of the land off the farms into the forest, was

another obstacle to the growth of yeomanry. Moreover, the curious and

inconvenient shape of the farms, most of them mere ribbons of land,

with a narrow frontage and disproportionate depth, handicapped all

efforts to cultivate the fields in an intelligent way. Finally, there

was the general poverty of the people. With a large family to support,

for families of ten to fifteen children were not uncommon, it was hard

for the settler to make both ends meet from the annual yield of a few

_arpents_, however fertile. The habitant, therefore, took the shortest

cut to everything, getting what he could out of his land in the

quickest possible way with no reference to the ultimate improvement

of the farm itself. If he ever managed to get a little money, he was

likely to spend it at once and to become as impecunious as before.

Such a propensity did not make for progress, for poverty begets

slovenliness in all ages and among all races of men.

If anything like the industry and intelligence that was bestowed

upon agriculture in the English colonies had been applied to the St.

Lawrence valley, New France might have shipped far more wheat than

beaver skins each year to Europe. But in this respect the colony never

half realized the royal expectations. On the other hand, the attempt

to make the land a rich grain-growing colony was far from being a flat

failure. It was supporting its own population, and had a modest amount

of grain each year for export to France or to the French West Indies.

With peace it would soon have become a land of plenty, for the

traveler who passed along the great river from Quebec to Montreal in

the late autumn might see, as Kalm in his _Travels_ tells us he saw,

field upon field of waving grain extending from the shores inward as

far as the eye could reach, broken only here and there by tracts of

meadow and woodland. Here was at least the nucleus of a Golden West.

Of colonial industry, however, not as much can be said as of

agriculture. Down to about 1663 it had given scarcely a single token

of existence. The colony, until that date, manufactured nothing.

Everything in the way of furnishings, utensils, apparel, and ornament

was brought in the company's ships from France, and no one seemed to

look upon this procedure as at all unusual. On the coming of Talon in

1665, however, the idea of fostering home industries in the colony

took active shape. By persuasion and by promise of reward, the

"Colbert of New France" interested the prominent citizens of Quebec in

modest industrial enterprises of every sort.

But the outcome soon belied the intendant's airy hopes. It was easy

enough to make a brave start in these things, especially with the aid

of an initial subsidy from the treasury; but to keep the wheels of

industry moving year after year without a subvention was an altogether

different thing. A colony numbering less than ten thousand souls did

not furnish an adequate market for the products of varied industries,

and the high cost of transportation made it difficult to export

manufactured wares to France or to the West Indies with any hope

of profit. A change of tone, moreover, soon became noticeable in

Colbert's dispatches with reference to industrial development. In

1665, when giving his first instructions to Talon, the minister had

dilated upon his desire that Canada should become self-sustaining in

the matter of clothing, shoes, and the simpler house-furnishings.

But within a couple of years Colbert's mind seems to have taken a

different shift, and we find him advising Talon that, after all,

it might be better if the people of New France would devote their

energies to agriculture and thus to raise enough grain wherewith to

buy manufactured wares from France. So, for one reason or another,

the infant industries languished, and, after Talon was gone, they

gradually dropped out of existence.

Another of Talon's ventures was to send prospectors in search of

minerals. The use of malleable copper by the Indians had been noted by

the French for many years and various rumors concerning the source

of supply had filtered through to Quebec. Some of Talon's agents,

including Jean Peré, went as far as the upper lakes, returning with

samples of copper ore. But the distance from Quebec was too great for

profitable transportation and, although Père Dablon in 1670 sent

down an accurate description of the great masses of ore in the Lake

Superior region, many generations were to pass before any serious

attempt could be made to develop this source of wealth. Nearer at hand

some titaniferous iron ore was discovered, at Baie St. Paul below

Quebec, but it was not utilized, although on being tested it was

found to be good in quality. Then the intendant sent agents to verify

reports as to rich coal deposits in Isle Royale (Cape Breton), and

they returned with glowing accounts which, subsequent industrial

history has entirely justified. Shipments of this coal were brought

to Quebec for consumption. A little later the intendant reported to

Colbert that a vein of coal had been actually uncovered at the foot of

the great rock which frowns upon the Lower Town at Quebec, adding that

the vein could not be followed for fear of toppling over the Château

which stood above. No one has ever since found any trace of Talon's

coal deposit, and the geologists of today are quite certain that the

intendant had more imagination than accuracy of statement or even of

elementary mineralogical knowledge.

Above the settlement at Three Rivers some excellent deposits of bog

iron ore were found in 1668, but it was not until five decades later

that the first forges were established there. These were successfully

operated throughout the remainder of the Old Régime, and much of the

colony's iron came from them to supply the blacksmiths. From time

to time rumors of other mineral discoveries came to the ears of the

people. A find of lead was reported from the Gaspé peninsula, but an

investigation proved it to be a hoax. Copper was actually found in

a dozen places within the settled ranges of the colony, but not in

paying quantities. Every one was always on the _qui vive_ for a vein

of gold or silver, but no part of New France ever gave the slightest

hint of an El Dorado. Prospecting engaged the energies of many

colonists in every generation, but most of those who thus spent their

years at it got nothing but a princely dividend of chagrin.

Mention should also be made of the brewing industry which Talon set

upon its feet during his brief intendancy but which, like all the rest

of his schemes, did not long survive his departure. In establishing a

brewery at Quebec the paternal intendant had two ends in mind: first,

to reduce the large consumption of _eau-de-vie_ by providing a cheaper

and more wholesome substitute; and second, to furnish the farmers of

the colony with a profitable home market for their grain. In 1671

Talon reported to the French authorities that the Quebec brewery was

capable of turning out four thousand hogsheads of beer per annum, and

thus of creating a demand for many thousand bushels of malt. Hops were

also needed and were expensive when brought from France, so that the

people were encouraged to grow hop-vines in the colony. But even with

grain and hops at hand, the brewing industry did not thrive, and

before many years Talon's enterprise closed its doors. The building

was finally remodeled and became the headquarters of the later

intendants.

Flour-making and lumbering were the two industries which made most

consistent progress in the colony. Flour-mills were established both

in and near Quebec at an early date, and in course of time there were

scores of them scattered throughout the colony, most of them built

and operated as _banal_ mills by the seigneurs. The majority were

windmills after the Dutch fashion, but some were water-driven. On

the whole, they were not very efficient and turned out flour of such

indifferent grade that the bakers of Quebec complained loudly on more

than one occasion. In response to a request from the intendant, the

King sent out some fanning-mills which were distributed to various

seigneuries, but even this benefaction did not seem to make any great

improvement in the quality of the product. Yet in some years the

colony had flour of sufficiently good quality for export, and sent

small cargoes both to France and to the French West Indies.

The sawing of lumber was carried on in various parts of the colony,

particularly at Malbaie and at Baie St. Paul. Beam-timbers, planks,

staves, and shingles were made in large quantities both for use in the

colony and for export to France, where the timbers and planks were

in demand at the royal shipyards. Wherever lands were granted by the

Crown, a provision was inserted in the title-deed reserving all oak

timber and all pine of various species suitable for mastings. Though

such timber was not to be cut without official permission, the people

did not always respect this reservation. Yet the quantity of timber

shipped to France was very large, and next to furs it formed the

leading item in the cargoes of outgoing ships. For staves there was a

good market at Quebec where barrels were being made for the packing of

salted fish and eels.

The various handicrafts or small industries, such as blacksmithing,

cabinet-making, pottery, brick-making, were regulated quite as

strictly in Canada as in France. The artisans of the towns were

organized into _jurés_ or guilds, and elected a master for each trade.

These masters were responsible to the civil authorities for the proper

quality of the work done and for the observance of all the regulations

which were promulgated by the intendant or the council from time to

time.

This relative proficiency in home industry accounts in part for

the tardy progress of the colony in the matter of large industrial

establishments. But there were other handicaps. For one thing,

the Paris authorities were not anxious to see the colony become

industrially self-sustaining. Colbert in his earliest instructions

to Talon wrote as though this were the royal policy, but no other

minister ever hinted at such a desire. Rather it was thought best that

the colony should confine itself to the production of raw materials,

leaving it to France to supply manufactured wares in return. The

mercantilist doctrine that a colony existed for the benefit of the

mother country was gospel at Fontainebleau. Even Montcalm, a man of

liberal inclinations, expressed this idea with undiminished vigor in

a day when its evil results must have been apparent to the naked

eye. "Let us beware," he wrote, "how we allow the establishment of

industries in Canada or she will become proud and mutinous like the

English colonies. So long as France is a nursery to Canada, let not

the Canadians be allowed to trade but kept to their laborious life and

military services."

The exclusion of the Huguenots from Canada was another industrial

misfortune. A few Huguenot artisans came to Quebec from Rochelle at an

early date, and had they been welcomed, more would soon have followed.

But they were promptly deported. From an economic standpoint this was

an unfortunate policy. The Huguenots were resourceful workmen, skilled

in many trades. They would have supplied the colony with a vigorous

and enterprising stock. But the interests of orthodoxy in religion

were paramount with the authorities, and they kept from Canada the

one class of settlers which most desired to come. Many of those same

Huguenots went to England, and every student of economic history knows

how greatly they contributed to the upbuilding of England's later

supremacy in the textile and related industries.

If we turn to the field of commerce, the spirit of restriction appears

as prominently as in the domain of industry. The Company of One

Hundred Associates, during its thirty years of control, allowed no one

to proceed to Quebec except on its own vessels, and nothing could be

imported except through its storehouses. Its successor, the Company of

the West Indies, which dominated colonial commerce from 1664 to

1669, was not a whit more liberal. Even under the system of royal

government, the consistent keynotes of commercial policy were

regulation, paternalism, and monopoly.

This is in no sense surprising. Spain had first given to the world

this policy of commercial constraint and the great enrichment of the

Spanish monarchy was everywhere held to be its outcome. France, by

reason of her similar political and administrative system, found it

easy to drift into the wake of the Spanish example. The official

classes in England and Holland would fain have had these countries do

likewise, but private initiative and enterprise proved too strong in

the end. As for New France, there were spells during which the grip of

the trading monopolies relaxed, but these lucid intervals were never

very long. When the Company of the West Indies became bankrupt in

1669, the trade between New France and Old was ostensibly thrown open

to the traders of both countries, and for the moment this freedom gave

Colbert and his Canadian apostle, Talon, an opportunity to carry out

their ideas of commercial upbuilding.

The great minister had as his ideal the creation of a huge fleet of

merchant vessels, built and operated by Frenchmen, which would ply to

all quarters of the globe, bringing raw products to France and taking

manufactured wares in return. It was under the inspiration of this

ideal that Talon built at Quebec a small vessel and, having freighted

it with lumber, fish, corn, and dried pease, sent it off to the French

West Indies. After taking on board a cargo of sugar, the vessel was

then to proceed to France and, exchanging the sugar for goods which

were needed in the regions of the St. Lawrence, it was to return to

Quebec. The intendant's plans for this triangular trade were well

conceived, and in a general way they aimed at just what the English

colonies along the Atlantic seaboard were beginning to do at the time.

The keels of other ships were being laid at Quebec and the officials

were dreaming of great maritime achievements. But as usual the

enterprise never got beyond the sailing of the first vessel, for its

voyage did not yield a profit.

The ostensible throwing-open of the colonial trade, moreover, did not

actually change to any great extent the old system of paternalism and

monopoly. Commercial companies no longer controlled the channels of

transportation, it is true, but the royal government was not minded

to let everything take its own course. So the trade was taxed for the

benefit of the royal treasury, and the privilege of collecting the

taxes, according to the custom of the old régime, was farmed out. All

the commerce of the colony, imports and exports, had to pass through

the hands of these farmers-of-the-revenue who levied ten per cent on

all goods coming and kept for the royal treasury one-quarter of

the price fixed for all skins exported. Traders as a rule were not

permitted to ship their furs directly to France. They turned them in

to farmers-of-the-revenue at Quebec, where they received the price as

fixed by ordinance, less one-quarter. This price they usually took in

bills of exchange on Paris which, they handed over to the colonial

merchants in payment for goods, and which the merchants in turn sent

home to France to pay for new stocks. Nor were the authorities content

with the mere fixing of prices. By ordinance they also set the rate of

profit which traders should have upon all imported wares brought into

the colony. This rate of profit was fixed at sixty-five per cent, but

the traders had no compunction in going above it whenever they saw

an opportunity which was not likely to be discovered. As far as the

forest trade was concerned, the regulation was, of course, absurd.

Every year, about the beginning of May, the first ships left France

for the St. Lawrence with general cargoes consisting of goods for the

colonists themselves and for the Indians, as well as large quantities

of brandy. When they arrived at Quebec, the vessels were met by the

merchants of the town and by those who had come from Three Rivers and

Montreal. For a fortnight lively trading took place. Then the goods

which had been bought by the merchants of Montreal and Three Rivers

were loaded upon small barques and brought to these towns to be in

readiness for the annual fairs when the _coureurs-de-bois_ and their

Indians came down to trade in the late summer. As for the vessels

which had come from France, these were either loaded with timber or

furs and set off directly home again, or else they departed light to

Cape Breton and took cargoes of coal for the French West Indies, where

the refining of sugar occasioned a demand for fuel. The last ships

left in November, and for seven months the colony was cut off from

Europe.

Trade at Quebec, while technically open to any one who would pay the

duties and observe the regulations as to rates of profit, was actually

in the hands of a few merchants who had large warehouses and who took

the greater part of what the ships brought in. These men were, in

turn, affiliated more or less closely with the great trading houses

which sent goods from Rouen or Rochelle, so that the monopoly was

nearly as ironclad as when commercial companies were in control. When

an outsider broke into the charmed circle, as happened occasionally,

there was usually some way of hustling him out again by means either

fair or foul. The monopolists made large profits, and many of them,

after they had accumulated a fortune, went home to France. "I have

known twenty of these pedlars," quoth La Hontan, "that had not above

a thousand crowns stock when I arrived at Quebec in the year 1683 and

when I left that place had got to the tune of twelve thousand crowns."

Glancing over the whole course of agriculture, industry, and commerce

in New France from the time when Champlain built his little post at

the foot of Cape Diamond until the day when the fleur-de-lis fluttered

down from the heights above, the historian finds that there is one

word which sums up the chief cause of the colony's economic weakness.

That word is "paternalism." The Administration tried to take the place

of Providence. It was as omnipresent and its ways were as inscrutable.

Like as a father chasteneth his children, so the King and his

officials felt it their duty to chasten every show of private

initiative which did not direct itself along the grooves that they had

marked out for the colony to follow. By trying to order everything

they eventually succeeded in ordering nothing aright.

Crusaders of New France A Chronicle of the Fleur-de-Lis in the Wilderness Chronicles of America, Volume 4 · 第 10 / 11 章