Act I, Scene 1 of _Hamlet_ had been assigned for home study and is now

Produced by Bryan Ness, Stephanie Eason and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

COLLEGE TEACHING

STUDIES IN

METHODS OF TEACHING IN

THE COLLEGE

Edited by

PAUL KLAPPER, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Education

The College of the City of New York

with an

Introduction by

NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER, LL.D.

President of Columbia University

Yonkers-on-Hudson, New York

WORLD BOOK COMPANY

1920

WORLD BOOK COMPANY

THE HOUSE OF APPLIED KNOWLEDGE

Established, 1905, by Caspar W. Hodgson

YONKERS-ON-HUDSON, NEW YORK

2126, PRAIRIE AVENUE, CHICAGO

A treasure of wisdom is stored in the colleges of the land. The

teachers are the custodians of knowledge that makes life free and

progressive. This book aims to make the college teacher effective in

handing down this heritage of knowledge, rich and vital, that will

develop in youth the power of right thinking and the courage of right

living. Thus _College Teaching_ carries out the ideal of service as

expressed in the motto of the World Book Company, "Books that Apply

the World's Knowledge to the World's Needs".

Copyright, 1920, by World Book Company

Copyright in Great Britain

_All rights reserved_

PREFACE

The student of general problems of education or of elementary

education finds an extensive literature of varying worth. In the last

decade our secondary schools have undergone radical reorganization and

have assumed new functions. A rich literature on every phase of the

high school is rapidly developing to keep pace with the needs and the

progress of secondary education. The literature on college education

in general and college pedagogy in particular is surprisingly

undeveloped. This dearth is not caused by the absence of problem, for

indeed there is room for much improvement in the organization, the

administration, and the pedagogy of the college. Investigators of

these problems have been considerably discouraged by the facts they

have gathered. This volume is conceived in the hope of stimulating an

interest in the quality of college teaching and initiating a

scientific study of college pedagogy. The field is almost virgin, and

the need for constructive programs is acute. We therefore ask for our

effort the indulgence that is usually accorded a pioneer.

In this age of specialization of study it is evident that no college

teacher, however wide his experience and extensive his education, can

speak with authority on the teaching of all the subjects in the

college curriculum, or even of all the major ones. For this reason

this volume is the product of a cooperating authorship. The editor

devotes himself to the study of general methods of teaching that apply

to almost all subjects and to most teaching situations. In addition,

he coordinates the work of the other contributors. He realizes that

there exists among college professors an active hostility to the study

of pedagogy. The professors feel that one who knows his subject can

teach it. The contributors have been purposely selected in order to

dispel this hostility. They are, one and all, men of undisputed

scholarship who have realized the need of a mode of presentation that

will make their knowledge alive.

Books of multiple authorship often possess too wide a diversity of

viewpoints. The reader comes away with no underlying thought and no

controlling principles. To overcome this defect, so common in books of

this type, a tentative outline was formulated, setting forth a

desirable mode of treating, in the confines of one chapter, the

teaching of any subject in the college curriculum. This outline was

submitted to all contributors for critical analysis and constructive

criticism. The original plan was later modified in accordance with the

suggestions of the contributors. This final outline, which follows,

was then sent to the contributors with the full understanding that

each writer was free to make such modifications as his specialty

demanded and his judgment dictated. This outline is followed in most

of the chapters and gives the book that unifying element necessary in

any book and vital in a work of so large a cooperating authorship.

The editor begs to acknowledge his indebtedness to the many

contributors who have given generously of their time and their labor

with no hope of compensation beyond the ultimate appreciation of those

college teachers who are eager to learn from the experience of others

so that they may the better serve their students.

TENTATIVE OUTLINE FOR THE TEACHING OF ---- IN THE COLLEGE

I. Aim of Subject _X_ in the College Curriculum:

Is it taught for disciplinary values? What are they?

Is it taught for cultural reasons?

Is it taught to give necessary information?

Is it taught to prepare for professional studies?

Is the aim single or eclectic? Do the aims vary for different

groups of students? Does this apply to all the courses in your

specialty? How does the aim govern the methods of teaching?

II. Place of the Subject in the College Curriculum:

In what year or years should it be taught?

What part of the college course--in terms of time or

credits--should be allotted to it?

What is the practice in other colleges?

What course or courses in this subject should be part of the

general curriculum or be prescribed for students in art, in

science, in modern languages, or in the preprofessional or

professional groups?

III. Organization of the Subject in the College Course:

Desired sequence of courses in this subject.

What is the basis of this sequence? Gradation of successive

difficulties or logical sequence of facts?

Should these courses be elective or prescribed? All prescribed?

For all groups of students?

In what years should the elective work be offered?

IV. Discussion of Methods of Teaching this Subject:

Place and relative worth of lecture method, laboratory work,

recitations, research, case method, field work, assignment from a

single text or reference reading, etc.

Discussion of such problems as the following:

Shall the first course in chemistry be a general and extensive

course summing up the scope of chemistry, its function in organic

and inorganic nature, with no laboratory work other than the

experimentation by the instructor?

Should students in the social sciences study the subject

deductively from a book or should the book be postponed and the

instructor present a series of problems from the social life of

the student so that the analysis of these may lead the student to

formulate many of the generalizations that are given early in a

textbook course?

Should college mathematics be presented as a series of subjects,

e.g., algebra (advanced), solid geometry, trigonometry,

analytical geometry, calculus, etc.? Would it be better to

present the subject as a single and unified whole in two or three

semesters?

Should a student study his mathematics as it is developed in his

book,--viz., as an intellectual product of a matured mind

familiar with the subject,--or should the subject grow gradually

in a more or less unorganized form from a series of mechanical,

engineering, building, nautical, surveying, and structural

problems that can be found in the life and environment of the

student?

V. Moot Questions in the Teaching of this Subject.

VI. How judge whether the subject has been of worth to the student?

How test whether the aims of this subject have been realized?

How test how much the student has carried away? What means,

methods, and indices exist aside from the traditional

examination?

VII. Bibliography on the Pedagogy of this Subject as Far as It Applies

to College Teaching. The aim of the bibliography

should be to give worth-while contributions that present

elaborations of what is here presented or points of view and

modes of procedure that differ from those here set forth.

PAUL KLAPPER

_The College of the City of New York_

CONTENTS

PAGE

INTRODUCTION xiii

By NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER, Ph.D., LL.D. President of Columbia

University. Author of _The Meaning of Education_, _True and False

Democracy_, etc. Editor of _Educational Review_

PART ONE--THE INTRODUCTORY STUDIES

CHAPTER

I HISTORY AND PRESENT TENDENCIES OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE 3

By STEPHEN PIERCE DUGGAN, Ph.D. Professor of Education, The

College of the City of New York. Author of _A Student's

History of Education_

II PROFESSIONAL TRAINING FOR COLLEGE TEACHING 31

By SIDNEY E. MEZES, Ph.D., LL.D. President of The College of

the City of New York. Formerly President of University of

Texas. Author of _Ethics, Descriptive and Explanatory_

III GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COLLEGE TEACHING 43

By PAUL KLAPPER, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education, The

College of the City of New York. Author of _Principles of

Educational Practice_, _The Teaching of English_, etc.

PART TWO--THE SCIENCES

IV THE TEACHING OF BIOLOGY 85

By T. W. GALLOWAY, Ph.D., Litt.D. Professor of Zoology,

Beloit College. Author of _Textbook of Zoology_, _Biology of

Sex for Parents and Teachers_, _Use of Motives in Moral

Education_, etc.

V THE TEACHING OF CHEMISTRY 110

By LOUIS KAHLENBERG, PH.D. Director of the Course in

Chemistry and Professor of Chemistry, University of

Wisconsin. Author of _Outlines of Chemistry_, _Laboratory

Exercises in Chemistry_, _Chemistry Analysis_, _Chemistry

and Its Relation to Daily Life_, etc.

VI THE TEACHING OF PHYSICS 126

By HARVEY B. LEMON, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Physics,

University of Chicago

VII THE TEACHING OF GEOLOGY 142

By T. C. CHAMBERLIN, Ph.D., LL.D., Sc.D. Professor and Head

of Department of Geology and Director of Walker Museum,

University of Chicago. Author of _Geology of Wisconsin_,

_The Origin of the Earth_. Editor of _The Journal of Geology_

VIII THE TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS 161

By G. A. MILLER, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics, University

of Illinois. Author of _Determinants_, _Mathematical

Monographs_ (co-author), _Theory and Applications of Groups

of Finite Order_ (co-author), _Historical Introduction to the

Mathematical Literature_, etc. Co-editor of _American Year

Book_ and _Encyclopedie des Sciences Mathematiques_

IX PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN THE COLLEGE 183

By THOMAS A. STOREY, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Hygiene, The

College of the City of New York. State Inspector of Physical

Training, New York. Secretary-General, Fourth International

Congress of School Hygiene, Buffalo, 1913. Executive-Secretary,

United States Interdepartmental Social Hygiene Board. Author

of various contributions to standard works on physiology,

hygiene, and physical training

PART THREE--THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

X THE TEACHING OF ECONOMICS 217

By FRANK A. FETTER, Ph.D., LL.D. Professor of Political

Economy, Princeton University. Author of _Economic

Principles and Modern Economic Problems_

XI THE TEACHING OF SOCIOLOGY 241

By ARTHUR J. TODD, Ph.D. Professor of Sociology and Director

of the Training Course for Social and Civic Work, University

of Minnesota. Author of _The Primitive Family as an

Educational Factor_, _Theories of Social Progress_

XII THE TEACHING OF HISTORY

A. American History 256

By HENRY W. ELSON, A.M., Litt.D. President of Thiel College.

Formerly Professor of History, Ohio University. Author of

_History of the United States_, _The Story of the Old World_

(with Cornelia E. MacMullan), etc.

B. Modern European History 263

By EDWARD KREHBIEL, Ph.D. Professor of Modern European

History, Leland Stanford University. Author of _The

Interdict_, _Nationalism_, _War and Society_

XIII THE TEACHING OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 279

By CHARLES GROVE HAINES, Ph.D. Professor of Government,

University of Texas. Author of _Conflict over Judicial

Powers in the United States prior to 1870_, _The American

Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy_, _The Teaching of

Government_ (Report of Committee on Instruction, Political

Science Association)

XIV THE TEACHING OF PHILOSOPHY 302

By FRANK THILLY, Ph.D., LL.D. Professor of Philosophy, Dean

of the College of Arts and Sciences, Cornell University.

Author of _Introduction to Ethics_, _History of Philosophy_

XV THE TEACHING OF ETHICS 320

By HENRY NEUMANN, Ph.D. Leader of the Brooklyn Society for

Ethical Culture. Formerly of the Department of Education,

The College of the City of New York, Author of _Moral Values

in Secondary Education_

XVI THE TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY 334

By ROBERT S. WOODWORTH, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology,

Columbia University. Author of _Dynamic Psychology_, _Le

Mouvement_, _Care of the Body_, _Elements of Physiological

Psychology_ (with George Trumbull Ladd)

XVII THE TEACHING OF EDUCATION

A. Teaching the History of Education 347

By HERMAN H. HORNE, Ph.D. (Harvard). Professor of the

History of Education and the History of Philosophy, New

York University. Author of _The Philosophy of Education_,

_The Psychological Principles of Education_, _Free Will and

Human Responsibility_, etc.

B. Teaching Educational Theory 359

By FREDERICK E. BOLTON, Ph.D. Dean of the College of

Education, University of Washington. Author of _Principles

of Education_, _The Secondary School System of Germany_

PART FOUR--THE LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES

XVIII THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH LITERATURE 379

By CALEB T. WINCHESTER, L.H.D. Professor of English

Literature, Wesleyan University. Author of _Some Principles

of Literary Criticism_, _A Group of English Essayists_,

_William Wordsworth: How to Know Him_, etc.

XIX THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH COMPOSITION 389

By HENRY SEIDEL CANBY, Ph.D. Adviser in Literary Composition,

Yale University. Author of _The Short Story in English_,

_College Sons and College Fathers_, etc.

XX THE TEACHING OF THE CLASSICS 404

By WILLIAM K. PRENTICE, Ph.D. Professor of Greek, Princeton

University, Author of _Greek and Latin inscriptions in Syria_

XXI THE TEACHING OF THE ROMANCE LANGUAGES 424

By WILLIAM A. NITZE, Ph.D. Professor and Head of Department

of Romance Languages, University of Chicago. Author of _The

Grail Romance_, _Glastonbury and the Holy Grail_, _Handbook

of French Phonetics_, etc. Contributor to _New International

Encyclopedia_

XXII THE TEACHING OF GERMAN 440

By E. PROKOSCH, Ph.D. Late Professor of Germanic Languages,

University of Texas. Author of _Teaching of German in

Secondary Schools_, _Phonetic Lessons in German_, _Sounds

and History of the German Language_, etc.

PART FIVE--THE ARTS

XXIII THE TEACHING OF MUSIC 457

By EDWARD DICKINISON, Litt.D. Professor of History and

Criticism of Music, Oberlin College. Author of _Music in the

History of the Western Church_, _The Study of the History of

Music_, _The Education of a Music Lover_, _Music and the

Higher Education_

XXIV THE TEACHING OF ART 475

By HOLMES SMITH, A.M. Professor of Drawing and the History

of Art, Washington University. Author of various articles

in magazines on art topics

PART SIX--VOCATIONAL SUBJECTS

XXV THE TEACHING OF ENGINEERING SUBJECTS 501

By IRA O. BAKER, C.E., D. Eng'g. Professor of Civil

Engineering, University of Illinois. Author of _Treatise on

Masonry Construction_, _Treatise on Roads and Pavements_

XXVI THE TEACHING OF MECHANICAL DRAWING 525

By JAMES D. PHILLIPS, B.S. Assistant Dean and Professor of

Drawing, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin,

Author of _Elements of Descriptive Geometry_ (with A. V.

Millar), _Mechanical Drawing for Secondary Schools_ (with

F. O. Crawshaw), _Mechanical Drawing for Colleges and

Universities_ (with H. D. Orth) and HERBERT D. ORTH, B.S.

Assistant Professor of Mechanical Drawing and Descriptive

Geometry, University of Wisconsin. Author of _Mechanical

Drawing for Colleges and Universities_ (with J. D. Phillips)

XXVII THE TEACHING OF JOURNALISM 533

By TALCOTT WILLIAMS, A.M. LL.D., Litt.D. Director, School of

Journalism, Columbia University

XXVIII BUSINESS EDUCATION 555

By FREDERICK B. ROBINSON, Ph.D. Professor of Economics and

Dean of the School of Business and Civic Administration,

College of the City of New York

INDEX 577

INTRODUCTION

It is characteristic of the American people to have profound faith in

the power of education. Since Colonial days the American college has

played a large part in American life and has trained an overwhelming

proportion of the leaders of American opinion. There was a time when

the American college was a relatively simple institution of a uniform

type, but that time has passed. The term "college" is now used in a

variety of significations, a number of which are very new and very

modern indeed. Some of these uses of the term are quite indefensible,

as when one speaks of a college of engineering, or of law, or of

medicine, or of journalism, or of architecture. Such use of the word

merely confuses and makes impossible clear thinking as to educational

institutions and educational aims.

The term "college" can be properly used only of an institution which

offers training in the liberal arts and sciences to youth who have

completed a standard secondary school course of study. The purpose of

college teaching is to lay the foundation for intelligent and

effective specialization later on, to open the mind to new

interpretations and new understandings both of man and of nature, and

to give instruction in those standards of judgment and appreciation,

the possession and application of which are the marks of the truly

educated and cultivated man. The size of a college is a matter of

small importance, except that under modern conditions a large college

and one in immediate contact with the life of a university is almost

certain to command larger intellectual resources than is an

institution of a different type. The important thing about a college

is its spirit, its clearness of aim, its steadiness of purpose, and

the opportunity which it affords for direct personal contact between

teacher and student. Given these, the question of size is unimportant.

There was a time when it was felt, probably correctly, that a

satisfactory college training could be had by requiring all students

to follow a single prescribed course of study. At that time, college

students were drawn almost exclusively from families and homes of a

single type or kind. Their purposes in after-life were similar, and

their range of intellectual sympathy, while intense, was rather

narrow. The last fifty years have changed all this. College students

are now drawn from families and homes of every conceivable type and

kind. Their purposes in after-life are very different, while new

subjects of study have been multiplied many fold. The old and useful

tradition of Latin, Greek, and mathematics, together with a little

history and literature, as the chief elements in a college course of

study, had to give way when first the natural sciences, and then the

social sciences, claimed attention and when even these older subjects

of study were themselves subdivided into many parts.

These changes forced a change in the old-fashioned program of college

study, and led to the various substitutes for it that now exist.

Whether a college prefers the elective system of study, or the group

system, or some other method of combining instruction that is regarded

as fundamental with other instruction that is regarded as less so, the

fact is that all these are simply different kinds of attempt to meet a

new condition which is the natural result of intellectual and economic

changes. Just now the college is in a state of transition. It is not

at all clear precisely what its status will be a generation hence, or

how far present tendencies may continue to increase, or how far they

may be counteracted by a swing of the pendulum in the opposite

direction. Therefore this is a time to describe rather than to

dogmatize, and it is description which is the characteristic mark of

the important series of papers which constitute the several chapters

in the present volume.

A careful reading of these papers is commended not only to the great

army of college teachers and college students, but to that still

greater army of those who, whether as alumni or as parents or as

citizens, are deeply concerned with the preservation of the influence

and character of the American college for its effect upon our

national standards of thought and action.

American colleges are of two distinct types, and it may be that the

future has in store a different position for each type. The true

distinction between colleges is according as they are separate or are

incorporated in a university system, and not at all as to whether they

are large or small. A separate college, such as Amherst or Beloit or

Grinnell or Pomona, has its own peculiar problems of support and

administration. The university college, on the other hand, such as

Columbia or Harvard or Chicago or the college of any state university,

has quite different problems of support and of administration. It is

not unlikely that the distinction between these two types of college

will become more sharply marked as years go by, and that eventually

they will appear to be two distinct institutions rather than two types

of one and the same institution.

Meanwhile, we have to deal with the college as it is, in all its

varied forms, but characteristically American whatever its form. The

American college has little or no resemblance to the English Public

School or to the French Lycee or to the German Gymnasium. It is

something more than any one of these, and at the same time something

less. It differs from them all very much as the conditions of American

life differ from those of English or of French or of German life. The

college may or may not involve residence, but when it does involve

residence, it is at its best. It is then that the largest amount of

carefully ordered and stimulating influence can be brought to bear

upon the daily life of growing and expanding youth, and it is then and

only then, that youth can get the inestimable benefits which follow

from daily and hourly contact with others of like age, like tastes,

like habits, and like purposes. Indeed, it has often been said that

the college gives more through its opportunities which attach to

residence, than through its opportunities which attach to instruction.

Almost every conceivable problem that can arise in college life and

college work, is discussed in the following pages. It is now coming

to be understood that the health of the college student is as much a

matter of concern as his instruction, and that a college is not doing

its full duty by those who seek its doors, when it merely provides

libraries, laboratories, and skillful teachers. It must also provide

for such conditions of residence, of food, of exercise, and of

frequent medical examination and inspection, as shall protect and

preserve the health of those who come to take advantage of its

instruction.

There is one other point which should not be overlooked, and that is

the literally immense influence exerted in America by that solidarity

of college sentiment and college opinion which is kept alive by

organizations of former college students scattered throughout the

land. This, again, is a peculiarly American development, and it serves

to unite the college and public sentiment much more closely than any

formal tie could possibly do. Indeed, it illustrates how completely

the American people claim the college as their own. The man or woman

who has once been a college student never ceases to be a member of

that particular college or to labor to extend its influence and to

increase its usefulness.

Every reader of this volume should approach it in a spirit of

sympathetic understanding of American higher education, and of the

college as the oldest instrument of that higher education and still

one of the chief elements in it.

NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER

_Columbia University_

PART ONE

THE INTRODUCTORY STUDIES

CHAPTER

I HISTORY AND PRESENT TENDENCIES OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE

_Stephen P. Duggan_

II PROFESSIONAL TRAINING FOR COLLEGE TEACHING

_Sidney E. Mezes_

III GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COLLEGE TEACHING

_Paul Klapper_

I

HISTORY AND PRESENT TENDENCIES OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE

1. THE COLONIAL PERIOD

=The predominance of the religious motive=

The American colonies were founded chiefly by Englishmen who came to

America for a variety of reasons. Some of these were economic and

political, but the most important of their reasons was the desire to

practice their religious convictions with greater freedom than was

permitted at home. Apart from the state religion, however, all the

colonists were animated by a love for English institutions which they

transplanted to the New World, and among these institutions were the

grammar school and the college. Wherever the Reformation had been

chiefly a religious rather than a political and ecclesiastical

movement, the interest in education and the effect upon it were direct

and immediate. This was true where Calvinism prevailed, as in the

Netherlands, Scotland, and among the Puritans in England. Hence it is

natural to find that the first effective movements in America toward

the establishment of educational institutions, both elementary and

higher, should have taken place in New England.

A large proportion of university graduates were included among the

settlers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. They were chiefly graduates

of Cambridge, which had always been religiously more tolerant than

Oxford, and especially of Emmanuel College, which was the stronghold

of Puritanism at Cambridge. It was natural that these men, leaders in

the affairs of the colony, should want to establish a New Cambridge

University, but it is astonishing that they were able to do so as

early as 1636, only six years after the founding of this colony. Two

years later the college was named after John Harvard, a clergyman and

a graduate of Emmanuel, who upon his death bequeathed half his estate

and all his fine library of three hundred volumes to the college. The

religious motive predominated in the founding of Harvard, for though

the colonists longed "to advance learning and perpetuate it to

posterity," they were actuated chiefly by dread "to leave an

illiterate ministry to the churches, when our present Ministers shall

lie in the Dust."

Harvard remained the sole instrument in the colonies for that purpose

for more than half a century. In 1693 the College of William and Mary

was founded in Virginia, with the most generous endowment of any

pre-Revolutionary college, generous because of the help received from

the mother country. It was the child of the Church of England, and its

president and its professors had to subscribe to the Thirty-nine

Articles. Subscription to a religious creed was also demanded of the

president and tutors of the third American college, founded in 1701.

This Collegiate Institute, as it was called, moved from place to place

for more than a decade, but finally it settled permanently in New

Haven in 1717. It afterward received the name of Yale College in honor

of Elihu Yale, who had given it generous assistance.

As a result of the founding of these three institutions, the New

England and the Southern colonies had their need for ministers fairly

well supplied, but this was not yet true of the Middle colonies.

However, the Presbyterians had become particularly strong in the

Middle colonies, and their religious zeal resulted in the

establishment of the College of New Jersey, now Princeton University,

in 1746.

A few years later Benjamin Franklin advanced for the college a new

_raison d'etre_. In 1749 he published a pamphlet entitled "Proposals

Relating to the Education of Youth in Pennsylvania," in which he

advocated the establishment of an academy whose purpose was not the

training of ministers but the secular one of developing the practical

virtue necessary in the opening up of a new country. The Academy was

opened in 1751, and the charter, granted in 1755, designated the

institution as "The College, Academy, and Charitable School of

Philadelphia." Though the extremely modern organization and curriculum

suggested by Franklin were not realized, the institution, which was

afterward called "The University of Pennsylvania," offered the most

liberal curriculum of any college in the colonies up to the

Revolution.

The human motive was uppermost also in the establishment of King's

College in 1754. The colonial assembly desired its establishment to

enhance the welfare and reputation of the colony, and the only

connection between the college and the Church of England lay in the

requirement that the president should be a communicant of that church

and that the morning and evening service of the college should be

performed out of the liturgy of that church. But the religious motive

again comes to the fore in the establishment of Brown University at

Providence, Rhode Island, in 1764, primarily to train ministers for

the Baptist churches; of Queens, afterwards named Rutgers, in 1766, to

provide ministers for the Dutch Reformed churches; and of Dartmouth,

in 1769, from which it was hoped at first that the evangelization of

the Indians would proceed.

=Character of the colonial college=

These colonial colleges in their histories bear a great resemblance to

one another. They were almost all born in poverty and led a desperate

financial existence for many years. In some cases survival was

possible only as the result of the untiring self-sacrifice of some

great personality like Eleazar Wheelock, the first president of

Dartmouth; in all cases, of the devotion of teachers and officers.

Their beginnings were all small; in some cases the president was the

only member of the instructing staff and taught all the subjects of

the curriculum. The students were few in number, the equipment was

simple, the buildings usually consisting of a house for the president,

in which he often heard recitations, a dormitory for the students, and

a college hall. Libraries, laboratories, and recreational facilities

were usually conspicuous by their absence. In fact, as the curriculum

consisted almost exclusively of philosophy, Greek, Latin, rhetoric,

and a little mathematics, there was no great need of much equipment.

The classics were taught by the intensive grammatical method; in

philosophy there was a great deal of dialectical disputation;

rhetoric was studied as an aid to oratory; mathematics included only

arithmetic and geometry. The aim of instruction was, not to give a

wide acquaintance with many fields of knowledge for cultural and

appreciative purposes, but rather to develop power through intensive

exercise upon a restricted curriculum. But the value of the materials

utilized to produce power which would function in oratory, debate, and

diplomacy is splendidly illustrated in the decades before the

Revolution. The contest between the colonies and the mother country

was essentially a rational contest in which questions of

constitutional law and, indeed, of the fundamental principles of civil

and political existence were debated. Splendidly did the leaders of

public opinion in the colonies, almost every one of whom was a

graduate of a colonial college, defend the cause of the colonists in

pamphlet and debate. And when debate was followed by war, twenty-five

per cent of the twenty-five hundred graduates of the colonial colleges

were found in the military service of their country. At the close of

the struggle for independence, it was again upon the shoulders of the

men who had gained vision and character in the colonial colleges that

the burden fell of organizing the mutually suspicious and antagonistic

colonies into one nation. Space will not permit even of the

enumeration of the great leaders who graduated from all the colonial

colleges, but an idea of the service rendered by those institutions to

the new nation may be obtained by mentioning the names of a few

statesmen who received their instruction in one of the least of them,

William and Mary. In its classrooms were taught Thomas Jefferson,

Benjamin Harrison, Edmund Randolph, James Monroe, and John Marshall.

2. THE NATIONAL ERA

=French influence=

French influence upon American political and intellectual life had

become quite pronounced as the result of the contact between the

leaders of the two peoples during and after the Revolution. That

influence was reflected in the colleges. Instruction in the French

language was offered in several of the colleges before the close of

the eighteenth century, and a chair of French was established at

Columbia as early as 1779 and at William and Mary in 1793. The

secularizing influence of the French united also with the

democratizing influence of the Revolution in diminishing the influence

of the church upon the colleges and emphasizing the influence of the

State and especially the relations between college and people. Of the

fourteen colleges founded between 1776 and 1800, the majority were

established upon a non-sectarian basis. These included institutions of

a private nature like Washington and Lee, Bowdoin, and Union, as well

as institutions closely related to the state governments like the

Universities of North Carolina and of Vermont. There can hardly be any

doubt that the French system of centralized administration in civil

affairs influenced the establishment of the University of the State of

New York. The University of the State of New York is not a local

institution, but a body of nine regents elected by the legislature to

control the administration of education throughout the State of New

York. Though organized by Alexander Hamilton, it was in all

probability much influenced by John Jay, who returned from France in

1784. But the most potent factor in the spread of French influence in

the early history of our country was Thomas Jefferson. While Jefferson

was American minister to France, he studied the French system of

education and embodied ideas taken from it in the organization of the

University of Virginia. This occupied much of his attention during the

last two decades of his life. The University was to be entirely

non-sectarian and had for its purpose (1) to form statesmen,

legislators, and judges for the commonwealth; (2) to expand the

principles and structure of government, the laws which regulate the

intercourse of states, and a sound spirit of legislation; (3) to

harmonize and promote the interests of all forms of industry, chiefly

by well-informed views of political economy; (4) to develop the

reasoning faculties of youth and to broaden their minds and develop

their character; (5) to enlighten them with knowledge, especially of

the physical sciences which will advance the material welfare of the

people. These progressive views of what the college should aim to do

were associated with equally advanced views of college administration,

such as the elective system and the importation of professors from

abroad. The remarkable vision, constructive imagination, courage, and

faith of Jefferson in his break with what was traditional and

authoritative in education has been justified by the fine career of

the university which he founded.

=The state universities system=

All the colleges that were established before the Revolution, and most

of those between the Revolution and the year 1800, had received direct

assistance from the colonial or state government either in grants of

land, money, the proceeds of lotteries, or special taxes. Most of

them, however, were dependent upon private foundations and controlled

by denominational bodies. The secularizing influence from France, the

growing interest in civic and political affairs, and the democratic

spirit resulting from the Revolution combined to develop a distrust of

the colleges as they were organized and a desire to bring them under

the control of the state. This was apparent in 1779, when the

legislature of Pennsylvania withdrew the charter of the college of

Philadelphia and created a new corporation to be known as "The

Trustees of the University of the State of Pennsylvania"; it was shown

in 1787 when Columbia College was granted a new charter by the state

legislature, under which the board of trustees were all drawn from the

Board of Regents of the State; it was made most evident in 1816 when

the legislature of New Hampshire transformed Dartmouth College into a

university without the consent of the board of trustees and empowered

the governor and council to appoint a Board of Overseers. In the

celebrated Dartmouth College case, 1819, the old board of trustees,

when defeated before the Supreme Court of New Hampshire in their suit

for the recovery of property which had been seized, carried the case

to the Supreme Court of the United States and engaged Daniel Webster

as their counsel. The Court declared the act of the New Hampshire

legislature in violation of the provision of the Constitution of the

United States which reads that "No state shall pass any ... law

impairing the obligation of contracts." The decision drew a sharp

distinction between public and private corporations, and a necessary

inference was that most of the existing institutions for higher

education were in the latter class. The result was to strengthen the

rising demand for publicly controlled institutions. The Southern and

Western states across the Alleghanies that were on the point of

framing state constitutions made provision for state universities

under state control.

The intention to provide higher education freely for the people had

already received its greatest impetus in an Act of Congress passed

shortly after the passage of the Ordinance of 1787, providing for the

organization of the Northwest Territory. By that act two entire

townships of public land were reserved to the states to be erected out

of the territory, the proceeds of the sale of which were to be devoted

to the establishment of a state university. These universities

followed swiftly upon the establishment of new states, and the

democratic ideal that prevailed is shown in the determination that the

state university was to be the crown of the public educational system

of the state. This is well illustrated in the provision of the

constitution of Indiana, adopted in the very year of the Dartmouth

College decision, 1819, which reads, "It shall be the duty of the

General Assembly, as soon as circumstances will permit, to provide by

law for a general system of education, ascending in regular gradation

from township schools to a state university, wherein tuition shall be

gratis and equally open to all." Circumstances did permit in the

following year, and the provisions of the bill materialized. The

national policy of granting public lands for educational purposes to

new states was continued, and one or two townships were devoted in

each case to the establishment of a state university. National

assistance to higher education was given on an immense scale in 1862,

when the Morrill Act was passed providing for the grant of 30,000

acres of land for each representative and senator, to be devoted to

the support in each state of a higher institution of learning, in

which technical and agricultural branches should be taught. Within

twenty years every state in the Union had taken advantage of this

splendid endowment, either to found a new state university which would

comply with the requirements as regards courses of instruction or to

establish an agricultural college as an independent institution, or in

connection with some already existing institution. Not only do some of

the finest state universities like those of California, Illinois, and

Minnesota owe their origins to the Morrill Act, but others owe to it

their real beginnings as institutions of collegiate grade. Up to the

passage of the Morrill Act a dozen state universities struggled to

maintain themselves with meager revenues and few students. They were

trying to do broad academic work, but by no means reached the

standards of the strong colleges in the eastern part of the country.

The establishment of state-supported and state-controlled universities

in the commonwealths organized after the close of the eighteenth

century by no means put an end to the establishment of colleges upon

religious foundations. Denominational zeal was very strong in the

decades preceding the Civil War, and the church was the center of

community life in the newly settled regions. The need to provide an

intelligent ministry and also a higher civilization led to the

establishment of many small sectarian colleges in the new states.

Despite the fact that practically all of them would today be

considered only of secondary grade, they accomplished a splendid work

and provided ideals and standards of intellectual life in a new

country whose population was engaged chiefly in supplying the physical

needs of life. The response made in the Civil War by the institutions

of higher education throughout the United States, whether privately or

publicly supported, was a magnificent return for the sacrifices

endured in their establishment and maintenance. Everywhere throughout

the North the colleges were depleted of instructors and students who

had entered the ranks, and in the South nearly all the colleges were

compelled to close their doors. Upon the shoulders of their graduates

fell the burden of directing civil and military affairs in state and

nation.

3. THE MODERN ERA

Were a visitor to Harvard or Columbia in 1860 to revisit it today, the

changes he would observe would be startling. The elective system,

graduate studies, professional and technical schools, an allied

woman's college, and a summer session are a few of the most noticeable

activities incorporated since 1860. It would be impossible to set any

date for the beginning of this transformation, so gradual and subtle

has it been, but the accession of Dr. Charles W. Eliot to the

presidency of Harvard College in 1869 and the establishment of Johns

Hopkins University in 1876 are definite landmarks.

This chapter is a history of the American college, and space will not

permit of a detailed description of these activities but simply of a

narration of the way they developed and of the forces which brought

them into being.

=The curriculum and the elective system=

It has already been mentioned that the curriculum of the average

American college at the beginning of the nineteenth century differed

but little from the curriculum followed in the middle of the

seventeenth. The reason is simple. The curriculum is based upon the

biological principle of adaptation to environment, and the environment

of the average American of 1800 differed but slightly from his

ancestor of a century and a half previous. The growth of the

curriculum follows, slowly it is often true, upon the growth of

knowledge. The growth of knowledge during the seventeenth and

eighteenth centuries was slow and insignificant compared to its

marvelous growth in the nineteenth century, particularly in the last

half of it. The great discoveries in science, first in chemistry, then

in physics and biology, resulted in their gradually displacing much of

the logic and philosophy which had maintained the prime place in the

old curriculum. The interest aroused in the French language and

literature by our Revolution; in the Spanish by the South American

wars of independence; and in the German by the distinguished scholars

who studied in the German universities during the middle decades of

the nineteenth century, caused a demand that those languages as well

as English have a place in the curriculum. This could be secured only

by making them partly alternatives to the classical languages. The

Industrial Revolution, based as it was upon the application of science

to industry, not only gave an impetus to the establishment of

technical schools, but by revolutionizing the production and

distribution of wealth pushed into the curriculum the science that

deals with wealth, political economy. The growth of cities that

followed in the wake of the Industrial Revolution, the conflicts

between the interests of classes,--viz., landowners, capitalists, and

laborers,--the rapid decay of feudalism and the spread of political

democracy following the French Revolution, the expansion of commerce

to all corners of the globe and the resulting development of

colonialism, all these human interests gave a new meaning to the study

of history and politics which caused them to secure a place of great

prominence in the curriculum during the last quarter of the nineteenth

century.

It is perfectly obvious that as the time at the student's disposal

remained the same, if he were to pursue even a part of the new subject

matter that was gradually admitted into the curriculum, the course of

study could no longer remain wholly prescribed and he would have to be

granted some freedom of choice. The growth in number of students also

produced changes in administration favorable to the introduction of

the elective system. In the early history of the American college one

instructor taught a single class in all subjects, and it was not until

1776 that the transfer was made at Harvard from the teaching of

classes by one instructor to the teaching of each subject by one

instructor. With increase in numbers the students were unable to

receive in each year instruction by every member of the teaching

staff. In spite of the quite obvious advantages of the elective

system, it was obstinately resisted by the defenders of the classics

and also of orthodox religion and at first made but slow progress.

Thomas Jefferson gave it the first great impetus when he made it an

essential element in the organization of the University of Virginia in

1825. Francis Wayland, president of Brown University and one of the

few college presidents of his day who were educators in the modern

sense, made a splendid exposition and defense of it in 1850 in his

"Report to the Corporation of Brown University on Changes in the

System of Collegiate Education." But the elective system waited upon

the elevation of Charles W. Eliot to the presidency of Harvard in 1869

for its general realization; in 1872 the senior year at Harvard became

wholly elective; in 1879, the junior year; in 1884, the sophomore

year; and in 1894 the single absolute requirement that remained in the

entire college course was English A. The action of Harvard was rapidly

imitated to a more or less thorough extent throughout the country.

Probably no two colleges administer the elective system in the same

way. There has been a considerable revulsion of opinion against

unrestricted election of individual subjects. In many colleges the

subjects of the curriculum were arranged into groups which must be

elected _in toto_. This resulted in the multiplication of bachelor's

degrees, each indicating the special course--arts, science,

philosophy, or literature--which had been followed. At the present

time the tendency is to prescribe the subjects considered essential to

a liberal education chiefly in the first two years and to permit

election among groups of related courses in the last two. This has

maintained the unity that formerly prevailed and introduced greater

breadth into the curriculum. It has also brought the new bachelor's

degrees into disfavor, and today the majority of the best colleges

give only the A.B. degree for the regular academic course. Valuable

modifications in the elective system are constantly being adopted. One

such is the preceptorial system at Princeton and elsewhere, under

which the preceptors personally supervise the reading and study of a

small group of students and can therefore advise them from personal

knowledge of their capacity. Another is the system of honor courses

adopted at Columbia and elsewhere, whereby a distinction is made

between mere "passmen" and students desirous of attaining high rank in

courses that are carefully organized in sequence.

=German Influence and graduate study=

The introduction of new subjects into the curriculum of the college

and the adoption by it of the elective system owe much to German

influence upon American education. Though this influence was partly

exerted by the study of the German language and literature, it

resulted chiefly from the residence of American students at German

universities. The first American to be granted the degree of Doctor of

Philosophy from a German university was Edward Everett, who received

it at Goettingen in 1817. He was followed by George Ticknor, George

Bancroft, Henry W. Longfellow, John Lothrop Motley, Frederick Henry

Hedge, William Dwight Whitney, Theodore Dwight Woolsey, and a host of

scholars who shed luster upon American education and scholarship in

the mid-nineteenth century. Most of these men became associated with

American colleges in some capacity and had a profound influence upon

their ideals, organization, and methods of teaching. They came back

devoted advocates of wide and deep scholarship, of independent

research, and of the need of such scholastic tools as libraries and

laboratories. But especially did they give an impetus to the movement

in favor of freedom of choice (_Lernfreiheit_) in studies. Only by the

adoption of such a principle could the pronounced tastes or needs of

individual students be satisfied.

Some slight effort had been made in the first four decades of the

nineteenth century by a few of the colleges to conform to the desire

of students for further study in some chosen field, but the results

were negligible. In 1847 Yale established a "department of philosophy

and the arts for scientific and graduate study leading to the degree

of bachelor of philosophy." The first degree of doctor of philosophy

was bestowed in 1861, but a distinct graduate school was not organized

until 1872. Harvard announced in the same year the establishment of a

graduate department to which only holders of the bachelor's degree

would be admitted and in which the degrees of doctor of philosophy and

doctor of science would be conferred. The graduate department was not

made a separate school, however, until 1890.

The greatest impetus to the establishment of graduate schools in the

American universities was made by the establishment of Johns Hopkins

University in 1876. Upon its foundation the chief aim was announced to

be the development of instruction in the methods of scientific

research. The influence of this institution upon the development of

higher education in the United States has been incalculably great.

Johns Hopkins was not a transplanted German university. The unique

place of the college in American education was shown by the fact that

graduate schools have followed the lead of Johns Hopkins in building

upon the college. Even Clark University at Worcester, founded in 1889

upon a purely graduate basis, established an undergraduate college in

1902.

One of the most gratifying features of higher education in the United

States during the past quarter century has been the extension of

graduate schools to the strong state universities. Research work in

them usually began in the school of agriculture, where the intensive

study of the sciences, particularly chemistry and biology, had such

splendid results in improved farming and dairying that legislatures

were gradually persuaded to extend the support for research to purely

liberal studies. With the growth and development of graduate schools

in this country, the practice of going to Europe for advanced

specialized study has abated considerably. It will probably so

continue in the future, particularly with regard to Germany. On the

other hand, should the new ideal of international good will become a

living reality, education through a wide system of exchange professors

and students may be expected to make its contribution.

=Technical and professional study=

While the graduate school was built upon the college, the technical

school grew up by the side of it or upon an independent foundation.

The first technical school was established at Troy, New York, in 1824,

and was called Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, after its founder,

Stephen Van Rensselaer. For a score of years no other development of

consequence was made, but in 1847 the foundations were made of what

have since become the Lawrence Scientific School at Harvard and the

Sheffield Scientific School at Yale. The passage of the Morrill Act in

1862 had a quickening effect on education in engineering and

agriculture. In the decade from 1860 to 1870 some twenty-two technical

institutions were founded, most of them by the aid of the land grants.

The most important of them is the Massachusetts Institute of

Technology, where instruction was first given in 1865 and which has

exerted by far the greatest influence upon the development of

scientific and technical education. The best technical schools require

a high school diploma for admission and have a four-year course of

study, but the only technical school on a graduate basis is the School

of Mines at Columbia University.

Professional education in theology, law, and medicine in the United

States was conducted chiefly upon the apprenticeship system down into

the nineteenth century. Though chairs of divinity existed in the

colonial colleges in the eighteenth century, systematic preparation

for the ministry was not generally attempted and the prospective

minister usually came under the special care of a prominent clergyman

who prepared him for the profession. In 1819 Harvard established a

separate faculty of divinity, and three years later Yale founded a

theological department. Since then about fifty colleges and

universities have established theological faculties and about 125

independent theological schools have been founded as the result of

denominational zeal. A majority of all these institutions require at

least a high school diploma for admission; half of them require a

college degree. Nearly all offer a three-year course of study and

confer the degree of bachelor of divinity.

Previous to the Civil War the great majority of legal practitioners

obtained their preparation in a law office. Though the University of

Pennsylvania attempted to establish a law school in 1791, and Columbia

in 1797, both attempts were abortive, and it remained for Harvard to

establish the first permanent law school in 1817. Even this was but a

feeble affair until Justice Joseph Story became associated with it in

1830. Up to 1870 but three terms of study were required for a degree;

until 1877 students were admitted without examination, and special

students were admitted without examination as late as 1893. Since then

the advance in standards has been very rapid, and in 1899 Harvard

placed its law school upon a graduate basis. Though but few others

have emulated Harvard in this respect, the improvement in legal

education during the past two decades has been marked. Of the 120 law

schools today, the great majority are connected with colleges and

universities, demand a high school diploma for admission, maintain a

three-year course of study, and confer the degree of LL.B. Twenty-four

per cent of the twenty thousand students are college graduates. In

some of the best schools the inductive method of study--i.e., the

"case method"--has superseded the lecture, and in practically all the

moot court is a prominent feature.

Entrance into the medical profession in colonial times was obtained by

apprenticeship in the office of a practicing physician. The first

permanent medical school was the medical college of Philadelphia,

which was established in 1765 and which became an integral part of the

University of Pennsylvania in 1791. Columbia, Harvard, and Dartmouth

also founded schools before the close of the eighteenth century, and

these were slowly followed by other colleges in the early decades of

the nineteenth century. During almost the entire nineteenth century

medical education in the United States was kept on a low plane by the

existence of large numbers of proprietary medical "colleges" organized

for profit, requiring only the most meager entrance qualifications,

giving poor instruction, and having very inadequate equipment in the

way of laboratories and clinics. In fact, medical education did not

obtain a high standard until the establishment of the Johns Hopkins

Medical School in 1893. Since then the efforts of the medical schools

connected with the strong universities and of the Rockefeller

Foundation to raise the minimum standard of medical education have

resulted in the elimination of the weakest medical schools. The total

number fell from 150 in 1900 to 100 in 1914. Not all of these demand a

high school diploma for admission, though the tendency is to stiffen

entrance requirements, but all have a four-year course of study. In

most institutions experience in laboratory, clinic, and hospital has

superseded the old lecture system as the method of instruction.

Closely associated with the progress in medicine and to a great extent

similar in history has been the progress in dentistry and pharmacy.

There are now fifty schools of dentistry, with nearly 9000 students,

and seventy-two schools of pharmacy, with nearly 6000 students.

One of the most gratifying advances in professional education has been

that of the teacher. Practically all the state universities and many

of the universities and colleges upon private foundations have

established either departments or schools of education which require

at least the same entrance qualifications as does the college proper

and in many cases confine the work to the junior and senior years.

Teachers College of Columbia University is on a graduate basis. Though

many of the 250 training and normal schools throughout the country do

not require a high school diploma for admission, the tendency is

wholly in that direction. In no field of professional education has

the application of scientific principles to actual practice made such

progress as in that of the teacher.

=College education for women--The independent college=

Few movements in the history of American education had more important

results than the academy movement which prevailed during the period

between the Revolution and the Civil War. Possibly the principle upon

which the new nation was established, i.e., the privilege of every

individual to make the most of himself, influenced the founders of

the academies to make provision for the education of girls beyond the

mere rudiments. Certainly this aspect of the movement had a

far-reaching influence. Some of the earliest of the academies admitted

girls as well as boys from the beginning, and some soon became

exclusively female. When it became evident from the work of the

academies that sex differences were not of as great importance as had

been supposed, it was not a long step to higher education. Some of the

academies added a year or two to the curriculum and took on the more

dignified name of "seminary." In this transition period the influence

of a few great personalities was profound, and even a brief sketch of

the history of women's education cannot omit to mention the splendid

work of Emma Willard and Mary Lyon. Mrs. Willard was an exponent of

the belief that freedom of development for the individual was the

greatest desideratum for humanity. She not only diffused this idea in

her addresses and writings but tried to utilize it in the

establishment in 1814 of the Troy Female Seminary, which was the

forerunner of many others throughout the country. Mary Lyon was rather

the representative of the religious influence in education, the

embodiment of the belief that to do one's duty is the great purpose in

life. In 1837 she founded Mount Holyoke Seminary, which had an

influence of inestimable value in sending well-equipped women

throughout the country a teachers. The importance of this service was

particularly evident during the period of the Civil War.

Although a number of excellent institutions for women bearing the name

of college were founded before the Civil War, the first one of really

highest rank was Vassar College, which opened its doors to students in

1865. Smith and Wellesley were founded in 1875, and Bryn Mawr in 1885.

These four colleges are in every respect the equal of the best

colleges for men. They are the most important of a dozen independent

colleges for women, almost all of which are situated in the East. To

establish the independent college was the chief method adopted in the

older parts of the country to solve the problem of women's higher

education, rather than to reorganize colleges for men where

conditions were already established.

=The development of coeducation=

The independent college is not the method that has prevailed in the

West. When the inspiration to higher education for women arrived west

of the Alleghanies, conditions, especially lack of resources,

practically necessitated coeducation. Oberlin, founded in 1834, was

the first fully coeducational institution of college grade in the

world. In 1841 three women received from it the bachelor's degree, the

first to get it. Oberlin's success had a pronounced influence on the

state universities, which, it was argued, should be open and free to

all citizens, since they were supported by public taxation. Almost all

the state universities and the great majority of the colleges and

universities on private foundations are today coeducational. The

results predicted by pessimists, viz., that the physical health of

women would suffer, that their intellectual capacity would depreciate

scholarship, and that the interests of the family would be menaced,

have not eventuated.

=The affiliated college for women=

The spread of coeducation in the state universities of the West and

the South and its presence in the newer private universities like

Cornell and Chicago had an influence upon the older universities of

the East. This influence has resulted in a third method of solving the

problem of women's education; viz., the establishment of the

affiliated college. Several universities have established women's

colleges, sometimes under the same and sometimes under a different

board of trustees, to provide the collegiate education for women which

is given to men by the undergraduate departments. Barnard College,

affiliated with Columbia University, Radcliffe College, affiliated

with Harvard University, Woman's College, affiliated with Brown

University, the College for Women, affiliated with the Western Reserve

University, and the H. Sophie Newcomb Memorial College for Women,

affiliated with Tulane University, have all been founded within the

past forty years.

=Graduate and professional studies for women=

All the universities for men except Princeton and Johns Hopkins and

all the fully coeducational institutions admit women upon the same

terms as men to graduate work. Graduate work is also undertaken with

excellent results in some of the independent women's colleges, as at

Bryn Mawr. Professional education for women has been coeducational

from the beginning, with the exception of medicine. The prejudice

against coeducation in that profession was so strong that five women's

medical schools were organized, but they provide instruction for

little more than a quarter of the women medical students. The increase

in the number of women in professional schools has not by any means

kept pace with the increase in the colleges. It appears that, with the

exception of teaching, woman is not to be a very important sector in

the learned professions in the near future.

=Undergraduate life--Fraternities=

Nothing differentiates more clearly the American college from European

institutions of higher education than the kind of non-scholastic

activities undertaken by the students. From the very beginning the

college became a place of residence as well as of study for students

from a distance, and the dormitory was an essential element in its

life. With increase in numbers, especially after the Revolution, when

all distinctions of birth or family were abolished, students naturally

divided into groups. The first fraternity, Phi Beta Kappa, was founded

in 1776 at William and Mary, with a patriotic and literary purpose,

and membership in it has practically ever since been confined to

graduates who have attained high scholastic standing. When one speaks

of college fraternities, however, he does not refer to Phi B K, but to

one of the intercollegiate social organizations which have chapters in

several colleges organized somewhat upon the plan of a club and whose

members live in a chapter house. The first such fraternity was founded

at Yale in 1821, but it was limited to the senior class. The three

fraternities established at Union in 1825-1827 form the foundation of

the present system. The fraternities spread rapidly and are today very

numerous. There are about thirty of national importance, having about

a thousand chapters and a quarter of a million members. The fraternity

system is bitterly attacked as being undemocratic, expensive, emphasizing

social rather than scholastic attainments, and, generally speaking, a

divisive rather than a unifying factor in college life. Hence some

colleges have abolished it. Fraternities have been defended, however,

as promoting close fellowship and even helping to develop character.

So strongly are they entrenched, not only in undergraduate but also in

alumni affection, that they probably form a permanent element in

college life.

=Religious life=

The early American college was primarily a place to prepare for the

ministry, and personal piety was a matter of official enforcement. For

a number of reasons religious zeal declined in the eighteenth century.

After the Revolution, under the influence of the new political

theories and of French skepticism the percentage of students

professing to be active Christians fell very low. In the early

nineteenth century the interest of students in religion increased, and

religious organizations in a number of colleges were founded.

Practically all of these later gave way to the Young Men's Christian

Association, which has now over 50,000 members organized in almost all

the colleges of the country save the Roman Catholic. The religious

interests of Roman Catholic students are in many colleges served by

the Newman Clubs and similar organizations, and of Jewish students by

the Menorah Society. The religion of college students has become less

a matter of form and speech and more a matter of service--social

service of many kinds at home and missionary service abroad.

=Physical education=

The educational reformers of Europe in the late eighteenth and early

nineteenth centuries placed great emphasis upon a more complete

physical training. This interest was felt in the United States, and

simple gymnastic apparatus was set up at Harvard and Yale in 1826. The

movement spread very slowly, however, due probably to ignorance of its

real physiological import. Since the Civil War the development of the

gymnastic system has been rapid, and now practically every first-class

college has its gymnasium, attendance upon which is compulsory, and

some have their stadium and natatorium. Of independent origin but

hastened by the spread of the gymnasium is the vast athletic interest

of undergraduates. Its earliest form, conducted on a considerable

scale, was rowing. The first rowing club was formed at Yale in 1843,

and the first intercollegiate race was rowed on Lake Winnepesaukee in

1852, Harvard defeating Yale. Rowing is now a form of athletics at

every college where facilities permit. The first baseball nine was

formed at Princeton in 1859, and the game spread rapidly to all the

other colleges. Football in a desultory and unorganized way made its

appearance early in the nineteenth century. As early as 1840 an annual

game was played at Yale between the freshmen and the sophomores, but

the establishment of a regular football association dates from 1872,

also at Yale. In the following year an intercollegiate organization

was formed, and since then football has increased in popularity at the

colleges to such an extent that just as baseball has become the great

national game, so has football become the great American collegiate

game. Track athletics is the most recent form of athletic sports to be

introduced into the college, and most colleges now have their field

days. In addition to these four major forms of college sports, tennis,

lacrosse, basketball, and swimming also have a prominent place. The

four major sports are usually under the control of special athletic

associations, which spend large sums of money and have a great

influence with the students. In fact, so great has become the interest

of college students in athletics that much fear has been expressed

about its influence upon scholastic work, and voices are not lacking

demanding its curtailment.[1] Military training is a phase of physical

education which, though it had earlier found a place in the land-grant

institutions, came to the fore as a part of the colleges' contribution

to winning the world war. Students' Army Training Corps were

established at many of the higher institutions of the country, and the

academic studies were made to correlate with the military work as a

nucleus. At the present time, however, the colleges are putting their

work back on a pre-war basis, and it seems most unlikely that military

training will survive as a corporate part of their work.

=Student literary activities--College journalism=

Journalism, though its actual performance is limited to a small number

of students, has had an honored place as an undergraduate activity for

almost a hundred years. It served first as a means of developing

literary ability among the students, afterwards as a vehicle for

college news, and now there has been added to these purposes the

uniting of alumni and undergraduates. Hence we find among college

journals dailies, monthlies, and quarterlies, some of them humorous

and some with a serious literary purpose. Journalism is not the only

method of expressing undergraduate thought. There has been a great

revival of intracollegiate and of intercollegiate debating in recent

years. Literary societies for debating the great issues preceding the

Revolution was the first development of undergraduate life, and every

college before and after the Revolution had strong societies. As

undergraduate interests increased in number, and especially as the

fraternity system began to spread, debating societies assumed a

relatively less important place, but in the past two decades great

interest has been revived in them. The glee club, or choral society,

along with the college orchestra, minister to the specialized

interests of some students, and the dramatic association to those of

others. One significant result of such activities has been to

establish a nexus between the college and community life.

=Student self-government=

One other feature of undergraduate life cannot be overlooked; viz.,

student self-government. The college student today is two or three

years older than was his predecessor of fifty or sixty years ago.

Moreover, with the great increase in the number of students has come a

parallel increase in complexity of administration and in the duties of

the college professor. Finally, a sounder psychology has taught the

wisdom of placing in the hands of the students the control of many

activities which they can supervise better than the faculty. As a

result of these and of other influences, in many colleges today all

extra-scholastic activities are either supervised by the student

council, the members of which are elected by the students, or by a

joint body of student and faculty members. The effect in almost every

instance has been the diminution of friction between the faculty and

students and the development of better relations between them. In some

colleges the honor system is found, under which even proctoring at

examinations does not exist, as all disciplinary matters, including

the decision in serious offenses like cheating, rest with the student

council. Student self-government is only one evidence of the

democratization that has taken place in the administration of the

college during the past two decades. Even more noticeable than student

self-government is the tendency recently manifested to transfer more

of the control of the government of the college from the board of

trustees to the faculty.

=New opportunities in higher education=

With the extension of commerce and the attempt to bring it under

efficient organization in the nineteenth century, the demand has been

made upon the colleges to train experts in this field. Germany was the

first to engage in it, and just before the war probably led the world.

France and England have remained relatively indifferent. In America,

the so-called "business college" proved entirely too narrow in scope,

and beginning with the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce of the

University of Pennsylvania (1881), the higher institutions have begun

to train for this important field. Some of the colleges of commerce,

like those of Dartmouth and Harvard, demand extensive liberal

preparation; others, like Wharton and the schools connected with the

state universities, coordinate their liberal and vocational work; a

few, like that of New York University, give almost exclusive attention

to the practical element.

Two other movements might be mentioned as illustrating the attempt to

extend the opportunity for higher education to an ever increasing

number of people. One is the development of extension courses and the

other the offering of evening work to those who cannot attend the

regular sessions. These are both steps in the direction of equality

of opportunity which is the ultimate aim of education in a democratic

country.

=The future of the college in American education--Relation to secondary

schools=

The college preceded the high school in time, and when the high school

began its career in the middle of the nineteenth century it was made

tributary to the college in all essentials. By deciding requirements

for admission, the college practically prescribed the curriculum of

the high school; by conducting examinations itself it practically

determined methods of teaching in the high school. But a remarkable

change in these respects has taken place in the past two decades. The

high school, which is almost omnipresent in our country, has attained

independence and today organizes its curricula without much reference

to the college. If there be any domination in college entrance

requirements today, it is rather the high school that dominates. Over

a large part of the country, especially in states maintaining state

universities, there are now no examinations for entrance to college.

The college accepts all graduates of _accredited_ high schools--i.e.,

high schools that the state university decides maintain proper

secondary standards. This growth in strength and independence has been

accompanied by a lengthening of the high school course from two years

in the middle of the last century to four years at the present time.

=The junior college=

With the introduction of the principle of promotion by subject instead

of by class, the strong high schools have been enabled to undertake to

teach subjects in their last years which were formerly taught in the

first years of the college. They have done this so well that the

practice has grown up in some parts of the country, especially on the

Pacific Coast, of extending the course of the high school to six years

and of completing in them the work of the first two years of college.

This enables more young men and women throughout the state to receive

collegiate education, and as the best-equipped teachers in the high

schools are usually in the last years and the worst-equipped teachers

in the college are usually in the first years, the system makes for

better education. Moreover, it relieves the state universities of the

crowds of students in the first two years and permits overworked

professors to concentrate upon the advanced work of the last two years

and upon research work in the graduate schools. A system which offers

so many advantages and is so popular both in the high school and the

university bids fair to spread.

=The abbreviated and condensed college course=

While the movement making for the elimination of the college from

below has been taking place in the West, another movement having the

same effect has been taking place in the East, only the pressure has

been from above. The tendency is spreading for the professional

schools of the strong universities to demand a college degree for

admission. If the full four years of the college are demanded in

addition to the four years of the secondary school and the eight years

of the elementary school, the great majority of students will begin

their professional education at twenty-two and their professional

careers at twenty-six, and they will hardly be self-supporting before

thirty. This seems an unreasonably long period of preparation compared

to that required in other progressive countries. The German student,

for example, begins his professional studies immediately upon

graduation from the gymnasium at eighteen. Hence the demand has arisen

for a shortening of the college course. This demand has been met in

several ways. In some colleges the courses have been arranged in such

a way that the bright and industrious student may complete the work

required for graduation in three years. In others, as at Harvard, the

student may elect in his senior year the studies of the first year of

the professional school. Another tendency in the same direction is to

permit students in the junior and even in the sophomore years to elect

subjects of a vocational nature. This has been bitterly contested by

those who hold that the minimum essentials of liberal culture should

be acquired before vocational specialization begins. Columbia

_permits_ a student to complete his college and professional studies

in six years, and at the end of that time he receives both the

bachelor's and the professional degrees.

It is to be noted, however, that these solutions of the problem and,

in fact, most other solutions that have been suggested, apply only to

a college connected with a university; they could not be administered

in the independent college. But a movement has developed in the Middle

West which may result in another solution; i.e., the Junior College.

It can be best understood by reference to the policy of the University

of Chicago. That institution divides its undergraduate course into two

parts: a Junior College of two years, the completion of whose course

brings with it the title of Associate in Arts, and a Senior College of

two years, the completion of whose course is rewarded with the regular

bachelor's degree. There have become affiliated with the University of

Chicago a considerable number of colleges throughout the Mississippi

Valley which have frankly become Junior Colleges and confine their

work to the freshman and sophomore years. And this has become true of

other universities. It would seem inevitable that the bachelor's

degree will finally be granted at the end of the Junior College and

some other degree, perhaps the master's, which has an anomalous place

in American education in any case, at the end of the Senior College.

This has, in fact, been suggested by President Butler. The University

of Chicago has also struck out in another new direction. Provided a

certain amount of work is done in residence at the University, the

remainder may be completed _in absentia_, i.e., through

correspondence courses.

The Junior College movement has had the excellent result of inducing

many weak colleges to confine their work to what they really can

afford to do. Many parts of our country have a surplus of colleges,

chiefly denominational. Ohio alone has more than fifty. The cost of

maintaining dormitories, laboratories, libraries, apparatus, and other

equipment and paying respectable salaries cannot be met by the tuition

fees in any college. The college must either have a large

income-producing endowment, which few have, or must receive gifts

sufficient to meet expenses. Gifts to colleges and universities form

one of the finest evidences of interest in higher education in the

United States, and reach really colossal proportions. In the past

fifty years, during which this form of generosity has prevailed, over

600 million dollars have been given, and in 1914 gifts from private

sources amounted to more than 30 million dollars. Most of this money

is given to the non-sectarian institutions and not to the small

denominational colleges scattered over the country. As they are in

addition unable to compete with the state universities, they are for

every reason justified in becoming Junior Colleges. But this does not

apply to the old independent colleges, such as Amherst, Williams,

Dartmouth, etc., which have loyal and wealthy alumni associations.

They have the support necessary to retain the four-year course and

seem determined to do so.

Just what the outcome of the whole question of shortening the college

course may be is not now evident. That concessions in time must be

made to the demand for an earlier beginning of professional education

seems certain. That the saving should be made in the college course is

not so certain. A sounder pedagogy seems to indicate that one year, if

not two, can be saved in the period from the sixth to the eighteenth

year. It is probable that the arbitrary division of American education

into elementary, secondary, collegiate, and university, each with a

stated number of years, will give way to a real unification of the

educational process. Most Americans would regret to see the college,

the unique product of American education, which has had such an

honorable part in the development of our civilization, disappear in

the unifying process.

STEPHEN PIERCE DUGGAN

_College of the City of New York_

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The bibliography on the American college is almost inexhaustible. The

list here given is confined to the best books that have appeared since

1900.

ANGELL, J. B. _Selected Addresses._ New York, 1912.

Association of American Universities. Proceedings of the Annual

Conference.

BUTLER, N. M. _Education in the United States._ New York, 1900.

CATTELL, J. M. _University Control._ New York, 1913.

CRAWFORD, W. H. (editor). _The American College._ New York, 1915.

(Papers by Faunce, Shorey, Haskins, Rhees, Thwing, Finley, Few,

Slocum, Meiklejohn, Claxton.)

Cyclopedia of Education, article on "American College." New York,

1911.

DEXTER, E. G. _History of Education in the United States._ New York,

1904.

DRAPER, A. S. _American Education._ Boston, 1909.

FLEXNER, A. _The American College: A Criticism._ General Education

Board, New York, 1908.

FOSTER, W. T. _Administration of the College Curriculum._ Boston,

1911.

HARPER, W. R. _The Trend in Higher Education._ Chicago, 1905.

KINGSLEY, C. D. _College Entrance Requirements._ United States Bureau

of Education, 1913.

MACLEAN, G. E. _Present Standards of Higher Education in the United

States._ United States Bureau of Education, 1913.

National Association of State Universities in the United States of

America. Annual Transactions and Proceedings.

RISK, R. K. _America at College._ London, 1908.

SNOW, L. F. _College Curriculum in the United States._ New York, 1907.

THWING, C. F. _History of Higher Education in the United States._ New

York, 1906.

---- _The American College; What It Is and What It May Become._ New

York, 1914.

---- _College Administration._ New York, 1900.

WEST, A. F. _Short Papers on American Liberal Education._ New York,

1907.

Footnotes:

[1] W. T. Foster in N.E.A. Reports, 1915.

II

PROFESSIONAL TRAINING FOR COLLEGE TEACHING

=Introduction=

Were this chapter to be a discussion of schemes of training, now in

operation, that had been devised to prepare teachers for colleges, it

could not be written, for there are no such schemes. Many elementary

and secondary teachers have undergone training for their life work, as

investigators have, by a different regimen, of course, for theirs. But

if college and university teachers do their work well, it is because

they are born with competence for their calling, or were self-taught,

or happened to grow into competence accidentally, as a by-product of

training for other and partly alien ends, or learned to teach by

teaching.

There are able college men, presidents and others, who view this

situation with equanimity, if not with satisfaction. Teachers are

born, not made, it is said. Can pedagogy furnish better teachers than

specialized scholarly training? it is asked. If we train definitely

for teaching, we shall diminish scholarship, cramp and warp native

teaching faculty, and mechanize our class procedure, it is objected.

Had the subject of training for college teaching been discussed, no

doubt other objections would have been advanced. But it has not been

discussed, as will be seen from the very scant bibliography at the end

of the chapter. No plan of training for college teaching is in

operation, and no discussion of such a plan can be found. Each of a

half-dozen men has argued his individual views, and elicited no reply.

This state of facts notwithstanding, the subject is well worth

discussing, and one may even venture to prophesy that in a decade, or

at latest two, the subject will have a respectable literature, and

enough training plans will be in operation to permit fruitful

comparisons.

When specific training is first urged for specialized work, there

always is opposition. The outgoing generation remembers the opposition

to specialized training for law, medicine, and engineering, to say

nothing of farming, school teaching and business. But in spite of

obstructive and retarding objections, specialized types of training

for specialized types of work have grown in number and favor, and

today we are being shown convincingly that nations which have declined

to set up the fundamental types of special training find themselves

able to make effective only a fraction of their resources. The

majority of the personnel in every higher calling has about average

native aptitude for it, and it is just the average man who can be

improved in competence for any work by training directed to that end

rather than to another. This is, of course, true of college teaching.

=How the college teacher has been and is trained=

In early days in this country the great majority of college teachers

were clergymen, trained in most cases abroad. Later bookish graduates

came to be the chief source of supply, their appointment in their own

colleges, and infrequently in others, following close upon their

graduation. Well into the third quarter of last century college

faculties were selected almost exclusively from these two types,

representatives of the former decreasing and of the latter increasing

in relative number. Neither type was specifically trained for teaching

in colleges or elsewhere.

With the founding and developing of Johns Hopkins University a new era

in higher education opened in this country. The paucity of exact

scholarship came to be known, and the country's need of scholarship to

be appreciated. In colleges grown from English seedlings we sought to

implant grafts from German universities. Independent colleges and

colleges within universities, while still called upon by American

traditions and needs to prepare their students for enlightened living

by means of a broadening and liberating training, came to be manned

preponderatingly by narrowly specialized investigators, withdrawn from

everyday life, with concentrated interests focused upon subjects or

parts of subjects, rather than upon students. Little thought was, or

is yet, given to the preparation of college teachers for their duties

as teachers, and that little rested, and still in large measure rests,

satisfied with the assumption that by some unexplained and it may be

inexplicable transfer of competence a man closeted and intensively

trained to search for truth in books and laboratories emerges after

three or more years well equipped for divining and developing the

mental processes and interests of freshmen.

Once fairly examined, this assumption lacks plausibility. "We consider

the Ph.D. a scholar's degree and not a teacher's degree," says the

dean of one of our leading graduate schools, and yet preparation for

this scholar's degree has been and is practically the only formal

preparation open to college teachers in this country.

=Equipment needed by college teachers=

It goes without saying that scholarship is one of the basal needs of

college teachers, a scholarship that keeps alive, and is human and

contagious. But it should be remembered that there are several kinds

of scholarship, and it is pertinent to ask what kind college teachers

need. Should they, for instance, model themselves on the broad

shrewdness and alluring scholarly mellowness of James Russell Lowell

or on the untiring encyclopedic exactitude and minuteness of Von

Helmholz? Or is there an even better ideal or ideals _for them_? I

would suggest that the teacher's knowledge of his subject should,

essentially, be of a kind that would keep him in intellectual sympathy

with the undeveloped minds of his students, and this means chiefly two

things. The more points of contact of his knowledge with the past

experience and future plans of his students the teacher has at his

command, the better teacher he will be; for he can use them, not as

resting places, but as points of departure for the development of

phases of his subject outside the students' experience. And secondly,

the teacher should see his subject entire, with its parts, as rich in

number and detail as possible, each in its proper place within the

whole. For the students' knowledge of the subject is vague and

general; he is trying to place it, and many other new things, in some

kind of a coherent setting; in fact, he is in college largely for the

very purpose of working out some sort of rudimentary scheme of things.

The duty of the college teacher is to help him in this quite as much

as to teach him a particular subject. And, besides, each particular

subject can be best taught if advantage is taken of every opportunity

to attach it to the only knowledge of it the student has, vague and

general though it be. Highly specialized and dehumanized knowledge is

not as useful for the college teacher as broad and vital knowledge,

which is, of course, much harder to acquire. Even in the case of

"disciplinary" subjects, there is no gain in concealing the human

bearings. The teacher should be trained to seize opportunities in the

classroom and out to help the student, through his subject and his

maturer life experience, to see the bearing of what he is learning on

the life about him and on the life he is to lead. This is the college

teacher's richest opportunity and the opportunity that tries him most

shrewdly. If he is to rise to it, his entire equipment, native and

acquired, must come into play.

What else does the teacher need? So that he may select the best and

continue to improve them, he needs a knowledge of the different

methods and aims in the teaching of his subject, and, so far as

possible, of the results attained by each. Too much of college

teaching is a blind groping, chartless and without compass. Instead of

expecting each inexperienced teacher to start afresh, he should set

out armed with the epitomized and digested teaching experience of

those that have gone before him.

Finally, the teacher needs a sympathetic and expert understanding of

the thinking and feeling of college students. This should be his

controlling interest. The teacher, his interest in his subject, and in

all else except the student, should be instrumental, not final. Every

available strand of continuity between studenthood and teacherhood

should thereafter be preserved.

This need suggests a capital weakness of the training for the

doctorate in philosophy as a preparation for teaching. As it proceeds

it shifts the interest from undergraduate student to scholarly

specialty, and steadily snaps the ties that bound the budding

investigator to his college days. It also explains the greatness of

some college teachers and personalities before the eighties. Their

degrees in arts were their licenses to teach. They suffered no drastic

loss of touch with undergraduate thought and life. In the early years

of their teaching this sympathetic and kindly understanding was fresh

and strong, and they used it in their classroom and wove it into the

tissue of their tutorial activities. A discerning observer of college

faculties can even today discover in them men and women who entered

them by the same door as these great ones of old, irregularly as we

would say now,--without the hallmark, and whose good teaching is a

surprise to their doctored colleagues. In one institution I know of,

the best five teachers some years ago were all of this type. The

training of college teachers might well, it therefore seems, include

an apprenticeship, beginning with, or in exceptional cases before,

graduation from college.

=The college legislator and administrator=

But the duties and opportunities of the college teacher do not stop at

the door leading from his classroom. In addition to dealing directly

with students, individually and in groups, and even, if possible, with

their families, as he grows in service he becomes, as faculty member

and committeeman, a college legislator and administrator. In

exercising these important functions he needs the equipment that would

aid him to take the central point of view, a background of scholarly

knowledge of what education in general and college education in

particular are in their methods and in their social functions and

purposes. There is too much departmental logrolling, as well as too

much beating of the air in faculty meetings, and too many excursions

into the blue in faculty legislation and administration arrangements.

The educational views of faculty members greatly need to be steadied,

ordered, and appreciably broadened and deepened by a developed and

trained habit of thinking educationally under the safeguards of

scientific method and on the basis of an adequate supply of facts.

That pedagogy has made but the smallest beginning of gathering and

ordering such facts and developing a scientific method in this field

is not a valid objection. These tasks are no more difficult than

others that have been compared, as _they_ will be, the sooner for

being imposed.

It is significant that coincident with sharp and widespread criticism

of the American college (justified in part by what college teachers

have been made into by their training), appear demands on the part of

faculties for more power. In this connection it may be remembered that

autocracy is the simplest and easiest form of government, and that

history shows that it can at least be made to work with less brains

and training than are required for the working of democracy. As

American colleges and universities have grown in complexity and

responsibility, their faculties have lost power because they did not

acquire the larger competence that was the indispensable condition of

even reasonably successful democratic control. It is highly desirable

that the power of faculties should increase to the point of

preponderance. But the added power they will probably acquire will not

be retained unless faculty members learn their business much better

than they now know it in most institutions. Thomas Jefferson, when

asked which would come to dominate, the states or the federal

government, replied that in the long run each of the opposed pair

would prevail in the functions in which it proved the more competent.

=A tentative scheme of training for college teachers=

To outline a scheme of such importance without any experience to

examine as a basis is a very bold undertaking, and one that can hope

for but partial success. What I shall propose, however, is similar to

the proposals of Pitkin (5), Horne (11), and Wolfe (14), my only

predecessors in this rash enterprise. The general spirit and purpose

of our proposals are the same. But we disagree more or less in

details--which is fortunate, as it may encourage discussion of the

subject, which is the thing most needed. Indeed, a lively sense of

this need has led me to venture some unpopular assertions. It may also

be admitted that the desiderata for teachers mentioned above are not

likely to be all insured by any system of training.

The proposal submitted for discussion is that a three-year graduate

course be established, its spirit and purpose being to train young men

to become _college_ teachers. This course should lead to a doctorate;

e.g., to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, or of Doctor of

Philosophy in Teaching, or of Docendi Doctor. What degree is selected

is, in the long run, relatively unimportant, provided the course is

soundly conducive to its end.

The course might well be divided into three parts, having the

approximate relative value in time and effort of two fifths, two

fifths, and one fifth. These parts should proceed simultaneously

throughout the three years, the first being an apprenticeship--under

supervision, of course--in the functions of the college teacher, the

second a broad course of study and investigation of the subject to be

taught, and the third a course of pedagogical study and investigation.

Let me suggest a minimum of detail within these outlines.

The apprentice teacher would, naturally, do the least classroom

teaching during his first year, and the most during his last. He would

also each year "advise" a group of freshman in studies and in life, or

cooperate with students in the conduct of athletics, dramatics,

publication work, or other "activities." On all this apprentice work

he would report, and in all he would be guided and supervised

appropriately by the department whose subject he was teaching, by the

department of education, and by other departments concerned. This and

other parts of the training would attract others in addition to

narrowly bookish graduates, something much to be desired (other parts

would eliminate those not bookish enough), and would tend to keep

alive in all apprentices an interest in students, especially in

student character, and to prevent them from thinking of students as

disembodied minds.

The course of study and investigation in the subject to be taught

should be based on adequate undergraduate work in the same and allied

fields, and should be something like the honor course in Oxford or

Cambridge (or our _old_ M.A. course) in its conduct and purpose; it

should hark back to our collegiate origin in England. The work should

be in charge of a don, a widely and wisely read and a very human

guide, philosopher, and friend. Stated class meetings and precise

count of hours of attendance should receive little emphasis. But wide

reading of the subject, in a spirit that breeds contagion, running off

into a study, in books, laboratories, and meetings, of the human and

practical bearings of the subject, should be required, and enough

conference with the don should be had to enable him to judge and

criticize the student's plan and amount of work, to test his mettle in

handling the subject, and to aid him to grasp it as a whole and in its

chief subdivisions, and to get glimpses of its bearings on and place

in human life. This part of the training should lead up to and

culminate in a thesis dealing with some major phase of the subject

comprehendingly in its setting and connections. Naturally this program

could be carried out most successfully with the social subjects, which

lend themselves easily to culture, like history or philosophy, and

less completely with the exact subjects, which are better fitted for

precise discipline, like mathematics. But if treated, as far as

possible, after the manner indicated, even the latter could be made

better instruments for the training of college teachers than they are

now in narrow specialization for the Ph.D. degree. Among returning

Rhodes scholars some excellent material for dons could be found.

The fifth of the course directed to pedagogy should include a very

brief study of the methods of teaching the chosen subject, with

glimpses into teaching methods in general; and courses in the history

and philosophy of education, with emphasis on, but by no means

exclusive dealing with, the educational and social functions of the

college. It might include an intensive investigation of some

relatively simple college problem in preparation for future faculty

membership. All this should, of course, be intimately articulated with

the student's apprenticeship work. Such a course of pedagogical study

should furnish a basis for better teaching methods and for helpful

self-criticism therein; should encourage the formation of a habit of

thinking and working out educational problems scientifically with eyes

open to the purpose of the college as a whole; and should discourage

departmental selfishness in legislation and administration.

=Incidental advantage=

The college would, under this plan, have some of its teaching done at

minimum cost by student teachers, who should receive only the graduate

scholarship or fellowship now customary for Ph. D. candidates. Care

would be necessary to prevent the assignment to them of mere routine

hackwork without training value. It is safe to say that, though

slightly less mature, their services, being supervised, would be more

valuable than those rendered during their first few years of teaching

by most better-paid winners of the doctorate of philosophy, who, if

they do so at all, grope their way to usefulness as teachers, with

little aid from others more experienced.

With good teaching prepared for, required, and adequately rewarded (a

point to be developed later), somewhat longer schedules could properly

be assigned and further economy effected. Schedules would, of course,

have to be kept short enough to allow ample time for reading, for some

writing, and for faculty and committee work in later years. But time

would not be required by _college_ teachers for specialized research,

and the freedom from such tasks resulting for them would be a blessed

relief to many who are now compelled to assume a virtue they have not,

and to conceal the love of teaching they have. And when we bear in

mind the heavy mass of uninspired and unimportant hackwork that is now

dumped on the scholarly world, we shall welcome the prospect of a

lightened burden for ourselves.

The need of students, especially of freshmen, for advisers is widely

recognized. They come into a new freedom exercised in a new

environment. This makes for bewilderment that involves loss of

precious time and opportunities, and presents perils which involve

possible injuries to many and certain injuries to some. Efforts, many

and various, to constitute a body of advisers chosen from among

faculty members have met with but little success. With few exceptions

the task is not congenial to those who now man our faculties, and for

that and other reasons they are ill fitted for it. But a greater

measure of success has been attained, even under present conditions,

when the cooperation of volunteers from among seniors and graduate

students has been had. This suggests that the problem might come

nearer solution when some dependence came to be placed upon the

services of apprentices. Such service would be a part of their regular

work having a bearing on their future career, and would therefore be

supervised and rest on sustained interest and the consciousness that

it was counting.

Finally, young student teachers would, under proper encouragement and

arrangement, help materially to bridge the gulf, that is broader than

is wholesome, between a faculty of mature men and young students. The

mixing of these different generations, so far as possible, is much to

be desired, difficult as it is to accomplish.

=Consequent change of plan in appointments and promotions=

This is not the place to discuss the details of appointment and

promotion plans, interesting and important as they are. But it is

evident that the scheme of training outlined, if adopted, would call

for changes in present practices.

The appointing authorities of colleges looking for young teachers

could ascertain their strong and weak points as they developed during

their apprenticeship in classrooms and in other educational

activities, as well as the quality and trend of their scholarship.

They would not rest satisfied with ascertaining the minute corner of

the field of philosophy, history, or physics in which a man

recommended had done research. Records could be kept throwing

much-needed light on the teaching ability, scholarship, and

personality of candidates for appointment. In selecting _college_

teachers, appointing authorities would value this evidence and would

come to prefer teaching power to investigating ability.

Moreover, the record keeping, and, no doubt, some of the supervision

begun during the apprentice years would continue during the early

instructorial years. This would render it possible to evaluate and to

value effectiveness in teaching in making promotions. Ambitious

teachers would no longer be practically forced, as their only resort,

to neglect their students and give their best energies to publication

in order to make a name and get a call, in the interest of promotion.

The expert teacher would have a chance and a dignity equal to that of

the skilled investigator. The individual could follow, and not be

penalized for so doing, his own bent and the line of his highest

capacity.

=Training of investigators=

The training now given in graduate schools here and elsewhere for the

doctorate in philosophy will, of course, continue, and increase rather

than diminish. Investigators will be preferred in research, in

universities, and in some colleges and college departments. They will

be increasingly prized in the government service and in important

branches of industry. The recent terrible experiences burn into our

minds the imperative need strong nations have of exact knowledge and

of skill that has a scientific edge. And the specific training for

these great tasks will be stronger when it is based on a college

course in which highly effective and whole-hearted teaching is valued

and rewarded.

SIDNEY E. MEZES

_College of the City of New York_

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ANONYMOUS. Confessions of One Behind the Times. _Atlantic_, Vol. 3,

pages 353-356, March, 1913.

CANBY, H. S. The Professor. _Harpers_, April, 1913.

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 2,

May, 1908, pages 55-57.

FLEXNER, ABRAHAM. Adjusting the College to American Life. _Science_,

Vol. 29, pages 361-372.

HANDSCHIN, C. H. Inbreeding in the Instructional Corps of American

Colleges and Universities. _Science_, Vol. 32, pages 707-709.

November, 1910.

HOLLIDAY, CARL. Our "Doctored" Colleges. _School and Society_, Vol. 2,

pages 782-784. November 27, 1915.

HORNE, HERMAN H. The Study of Education by Prospective College

Instructors. _School Review_, Vol. 16, March, 1908, pages 162-170.

PITKIN, W. B. Training College Teachers. _Popular Science_, Vol. 74,

pages 588-595. June, 1909.

Report of the Committee on Standards of American Universities.

_Science_, Vol. 29, page 172. November 17, 1908.

ROBINSON, MABEL L. Need of Supervision in College Teaching. _School

and Society_, Vol. 2, pages 514-519, October 9, 1915.

SANDERSON, E. D. Definiteness of Appointment and Tenure. _Science_,

Vol. 39, pages 890-896, June, 1914.

STEWART, Charles A. Appointment and Promotion of College Instructors.

_Educational Review_, Vol. 44, 1912, pages 249-256.

WILCZYNSKI, E. J. Appointments in College and Universities. _Science_,

February 28, 1909; Vol. 29, pages 336ff.

WOLFE, A. B. The Graduate School, Faculty Responsibility, and the

Training of University Teachers. _School and Society_, September 16,

1916.

III

GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COLLEGE TEACHING

=Status of teaching in the colleges=

The investigator of educational practices and methods of teaching is

impressed with an unmistakable educational anti-climax, for the

conviction grows on him that elementary school teaching is on a

relatively high plane, that secondary school teaching is not as

effective, and that collegiate teaching, with rare exceptions, is

ineffective and in urgent need of reform. A superficial survey of

educational literature of the last ten years shows that while the

problem of the high school is now receiving earnest attention,

elementary education continues to absorb the earnest efforts of an

army of vitally interested investigators. The field of college

pedagogics is still virgin soil, and no significant or extensive

program for improved methods of teaching has yet been advanced.

Three earnest and intelligent students representing three colleges of

undisputed standing were asked informally about their instructors for

the current semester. Nothing was said to make these students aware

that their judgment would hold any significance beyond the friendly

conversation. The summary of opinions is offered, not because the

investigation is complete and affords a basis for scientific

conclusion, but because it reflects typical college teaching in three

recognized institutions of more than average standing.

STUDENT NO. I | STUDENT NO. II | STUDENT NO. III

| |

_Teacher A_: A popular | _Teacher A_: A good | _Teacher A_: A very

and interesting | teacher of mathematics.| popular teacher of

teacher. Talks | He assigns a new lesson| English. If the final

enthusiastically, but | for home study. The | examination is given

talks all the time. | next day he asks | by another teacher, I

Lessons assigned are | questions on the | may not have enough

not heard. Students | lesson. The answers are| specific facts to

seldom recite. Written | written out on the | pass. We began Chaucer

quizzes on themes of | blackboards. After | last week. He spent a

assigned reading are | fifteen minutes all | good part of each

rated by an assistant. | students take their | session reading to us.

The work comes back | seats and the work on | All of us were

with an A, a C, or a D,| the blackboard is taken| surprised to find how

but we do not know why | up for explanation. He | much more the text

the rating was given. | explains every | meant than after our

Frequently two students| difficulty very | own reading. In the

who worked together are| clearly. We rarely | last session we went

marked B and D | cover the lesson. Some | to our book on

respectively for the | topics go unexplained | literature and tried

same work. Sometimes a | because during the next| to justify the

a student who "cribbed"| hour the blackboard | characterization which

his outline from | problems are based on | the author gives of

another who actually | the lesson. If I | Chaucer. The class

"worked it up" receives| understood the second | agreed with all in the

a higher mark than was | half of each lesson as | book except in one

given for the original.| clearly as the first, | characterization. In

| I would feel hopeful | the composition work we

| of a good grade in the | took up the structure

| final examination. | of short narratives.

| | The assignment was to

| | find narratives in

| | current periodicals,

| | in the writings of

| | standard authors, in

| | newspapers, and then

| | attempt to find whether

| | the structure we

| | studied was followed.

| | In each case we had to

| | justify any departure

| | from the standard.

| | There was little time

| | for the footnotes in

| | Chaucer. I hope we are

| | not asked for these on

| | the final examination.

| |

| |

_Teacher B_: Rather an | _Teacher B_: A dry | _Teacher B_: A very

interesting teacher; | course in Art History | conscientious teacher

assigns lessons from a | and Appreciation. We | of chemistry. He gives

book. At the beginning | take up the history of | us a ten-minute written

of the hour he asks | architecture, painting,| quiz each hour on the

questions on the text | and sculpture. The | work in the book or on

but is soon carried | names of the best | the matter discussed in

away and rambles along | artists are mentioned, | the last lecture. The

for the period, | and their many works | rest of the hour is

touching on every | confuse us. We memorize| spent in explanation of

subject. We never | Praxiteles, Phidias, | difficult points and in

complete a chapter or | Myron, the ancient | the application of what

topic. The succeeding | cairns, the parts of an| we learned of industry

hour we take the next | Egyptian temple. | and physiology. It is

chapter, which meets | Pictures are shown on | surprising to see the

the same fate. Written | the screen. I elected | interest the class

tests determine the | this course in the hope| shows in the chemical

students' rank. The | that it would teach me | explanations of things

grade for the written | something about | we never noticed

test is announced, but | pictures, how to judge | before.

the papers are not | them and give me |

returned and one never | standards of beauty, |

knows why the papers | etc., but it has been |

were rated C or D. | history and not |

| appreciation so far. |

| We do not see any |

| beauty in the pictures |

| of old madonnas. Even |

| the religious ones |

| among us say this. |

| |

| |

_Teacher C_: | _Teacher C_: A good, | _Teacher C_: A scholarly

A conscientious teacher| clear, effective | instructor in history.

in physics. He assigns | lecturer in chemistry. | He assigns thirty to

a definite lesson for | Every lesson we learn a| forty pages in English

each recitation of the | definite principle and | History, and then he

term. At the beginning | its application. The | lectures to us about

of the hour students go| laboratory work of each| the topics discussed by

to the board to write | is related to the | the author. He points

out answers to | lecture and throws | out errors in dates and

questions on the | interesting side lights| places. Occasionally he

lesson. The hour is | on it. We have quiz | calls on a student. At

spent listening to the | sections once a week. | the end of each month

recitation of each | Here the work is oral | he gives a written test.

student and the | and written. | We remember little of

explanation of | | what we learned and

difficult points. We | | must "bone away" at

never cover more than | | about 200 to 300 pages.

one half of the lesson:| | His English is

sometimes only one | | delightful and we enjoy

third. The next hour | | listening at times,

the questions are on | | but I seem to retain

the new lesson, not on | | so little. "Yes, half

the incompleted portion| | the term is up. We are

of the former lesson. | | beginning the reign of

My knowledge of physics| | Henry VII."

is punctuated by areas | |

of ignorance. These | |

alternate with topics | |

that I think I | |

understand clearly. | |

| |

| |

_Teacher D_: A quiet, | _Teacher D_: A very | _Teacher D_: A very

modest man. Sits back | strict teacher of | enthusiastic lecturer

comfortably in his seat| English literature. He | in economics. He

and asks questions on | assigns text for study,| explains the important

assigned texts. The | and we must be prepared| principles in

questions review the | for detailed questions | economics. We follow

text, and he explains | on each of the great | in a printed syllabus,

in further detail the | writers. He is very | so that it is

facts in the book. The | strict and detailed. We| unnecessary to take

conscientious and | had to know all the | notes. He talks well

capable student finds | fifteen qualities of | and makes things clear.

him superfluous; the | Macaulay's style. "No, | We are given assignments

indifferent student | we did not read | in S----'s "Elements of

remains unmoved by his | Macaulay this term: we | Economics," on which we

phlegmatic | study from a history of| are questioned by

presentation; the poor | English literature that| another teacher. "Is

student finds him a | tells us all about the | the work in the quiz

help; the shirk who | master writers." | section related directly

listens and takes notes| | to the lectures?

is saved studying at | | Sometimes. No, we do

home. | | not take current

| | economic problems. These

| | are given in a later

| | elective course."

| |

| |

_Teacher E_: A good | _Teacher E_: A quiet, | _Teacher E_: An

teacher of Latin. He | dignified gentleman who| instructor in

explains the work, | teaches us psychology. | psychology. His hours

hears the lessons, | A chapter is assigned | are weary and dreary.

gives drills, calls on | in the book, and the | A chapter is assigned

almost everybody every | hour is spent hearing | in X's "Elements of

hour. The written work | students recite on the | Psychology." He asks a

is returned properly | text. He sticks closely| question or two and

corrected and rated. | to the book. He | then repeats what the

| explains clearly when | author tells us, even

| the book is not clear | using the illustrations

| or not specific enough.| and diagrams found in

| The hours drag, for the| the text. Sometimes a

| book is good and those | student reads a paper

| who studied the lessons| which he prepared. "No,

| weary at what seems to | we do not get very much

| us needless repetition.| out of these papers

| | read by students. But

| | then we get just as

| | little from the

| | instructor. No, we

| | never apply the

| | psychology to our own

| | thinking nor to

| | teaching nor to the

| | behavior of children

| | or adults."

| |

| |

_Teacher F_: One | _Teacher F_: A learned | _Teacher F_: A

cannot pass judgment on| Latin scholar who is | forbidding but very

this teacher of | very enthusiastic about| strict Latin teacher.

mechanical drawing. He | his specialty. The | His questions are fast

gives out a problem, | students exhibit | and numerous and the

works a type on the | cheerful tolerance. He | hesitating student is

board, and then | assigns a given number | lost. He assigns at

distributes the plates.| of lines per day. These| least twenty-five per

We draw. He helps us | we prepare at home. In | cent more per lesson

when we ask for aid, | class we give a | than any other

otherwise he walks | translation in English | instructor. The hour is

about the room. I | that has distorted | spent in translating,

suppose one cannot show| phrases and clauses | parsing, and quizzing

teaching ability in | lest we be accused of | on historical and

such a subject. | dishonesty in | mythological allusions.

| preparation. The rest | Every "pony" user is

| of the time is spent on| soon caught, because

| questions of syntax, | he is asked so many

| references, footnotes, | questions on each

| and the identification | sentence. There is a

| of the of the real and | distinct relief when

| mythological characters| the hour is over because

| in the text. The | he is constantly at you.

| teacher is animated and| "Will I take the next

| effective. | course in Latin? Not

| | unless I must. This is

| | prescribed work. It

| | can't end too soon for

| | me, nor for the others

| | in the class."

The student of scientific and statistical measurements in education

may object to attaching any importance to these informal

characterizations of college teachers by undergraduates. College

teachers interested in the pedagogical aspects of their subject, and

college administrators who spend time observing class instruction will

concede that these young men were not at all unfortunate in their

teachers. The significance of these characterizations is not that

college teachers vary in teaching efficiency, but rather that

inefficient college teaching is general, and that the causes of this

inefficiency are such as respond readily to simple remedial measures

very well known to elementary and high school teachers.

=Causes of ineffective college teaching=

It may be well to note the chief causes of ineffective college

teaching before directing attention to a remedial program:

(a) Many college teachers hold to be true the time-honored fallacy

that the only equipment for successful teaching is a thorough

knowledge of the subject. They do not stop to square their belief with

actual facts. They overlook the examples of their colleagues possessed

of undisputed scholarship who are failures in the classroom. They fail

to realize that there are psychological and pedagogical aspects of the

teaching art which demand careful organization, skilful gradation and

a happy selection of illustrations intimately related to the lives of

the students.

(_b_) Closely related to this first cause of ineffective teaching is a

lack of sympathetic understanding of the student's viewpoint. The

scholarly teacher, deep in the intricacies and speculations of his

specialty, is often impatient with the groping of the beginner. He may

not realize that the student before him, apparently indifferent to the

most vital aspects of his subject, has potentialities for development

in it. His interest in his researches and his vision of the

far-reaching human relations of his subject may blind him to the

difficulties that beset the path of the beginner.

(_c_) The inferiority of college teaching in many institutions can

often be traced to the absence of constructive supervision. The

supervising officer in elementary and secondary schools makes

systematic visits to the classrooms of young or ineffective teachers,

observes their work, offers remedial suggestions, and tries to infuse

a professional interest in the technique of teaching. In the college

such supervision would usually stir deep resentment. The college

teacher is, in matters of teaching, a law unto himself. He sees little

of the actual teaching of his colleagues; they see as little of his.

His contact with the head of his department, and his departmental and

faculty meetings, are usually limited to discussions of college policy

and of the sequence and content of courses. Methods of teaching are

rarely, if ever, brought up for discussion. The results are

inevitable. Weaknesses in teaching are perpetuated, while the devices

and practices of an effective teacher remain unknown to his

colleagues.

(_d_) A fourth factor which accounts for much of the inefficiency in

college pedagogics is made the thesis of Dr. Mezes' chapter on "The

Training of the College Teacher." The college teacher, unlike teachers

in other grades of an educational system, is expected to teach without

a knowledge of educational aims and ideals, and without a knowledge of

the psychological principles which should guide him in his work. The

prospective college teacher, having given evidence of scholarship

alone, has intrusted to him, the noisy, expressive, and rapidly

developing, youth. We set up no standards aside from character and

scholarship. We do not demand evidence of teaching ability, a

knowledge of applied psychology and of accepted teaching practices,

skill in presentation, power of organizing material in graded

sequence, or ability to frame a series of questions designed to

stimulate and sustain the self-activity of the pupils. The born

college teacher remains the successful teacher. The poor college

teacher finds no agent which tends to raise his teaching to a higher

level. The temperamentally unfit are not weeded out. But teaching is

an art, and like all arts it requires conscientious professional

preparation, the mastery of underlying scientific principles, and

practice under supervision scrupulous in its attention to technique.

We have here outlined a few of the causes which keep college teaching

on a low plane. The remedial measures are in each case too obvious to

mention. It remains for college authorities to formulate a

well-conceived and adjustable program of means and methods of ridding

college teaching of those forces which keep it in a discouraging

state. It is our purpose in the remainder of this chapter not to

evolve a system of pedagogics, but rather to touch on the most vital

principles in teaching which must be borne in mind if college teaching

is to be rendered pedagogically comparable to elementary and secondary

teaching. We shall confine ourselves to teaching practices which are

applicable to all subjects in the college curriculum.

PRINCIPLES IN COLLEGE TEACHING

=A clearly conceived aim must control all teaching=

One of the very first elements in good teaching is the clear

recognition of a well-defined aim that gives purpose and direction to

all that is attempted in a lesson or in a period. The chief cause of

poor teaching is aimless teaching, in which the sole object seems to

be to fill the allotted time with talking about the facts of a given

subject. We sit patiently through a recitation in English literature.

Act I, Scene 1 of _Hamlet_ had been assigned for home study and is now

the text for the hour. Questions are asked on the dramatic structure

of this scene, on versification, on the meaning of words and

expressions now obsolete, on peculiarities of syntax, and finally a

question or two on a character portrayal. The bell brings these

questions to an abrupt end. Ask teacher and students the aim of all

these questions. To the former, they are means of testing the

students' knowledge of a variety of facts of language and literature;

to the latter they mean little, and serve only to repress a living

interest and appreciation of living literary text. How much more

effective the hour in English literature would have been if the entire

act had been assigned with a view to giving the students an insight

into the dramatic structure of each scene in this act and of the act

as a whole. All the questions would then bear on dramatic movement, on

the dramatist's technique, on his way of arousing interest in his

story, on devices for giving the cause and the development of the

action. In the opening scene we read:

_Elsinore. A Platform before the Castle._

_Francisco at his post. Enter to him Bernardo._

BER. Who's there?

FRAN. Nay, answer me; stand, and unfold yourself.

BER. Long live the King!

FRAN. Bernardo?

BER. He.

FRAN. You come most carefully upon your hour.

BER. 'Tis now struck twelve; get thee to bed, Francisco.

FRAN. For this relief much thanks: 'tis bitter cold. And I am sick

at heart.

BER. Have you had a quiet guard?

Here we see the guard on duty challenged by his relief, a most unusual

procedure. Why does this experienced guard so far forget the customary

forms as to challenge the guard on duty? What possible reason can

there be for this? How would you read the second line? What words must

be emphasized to show the surprise of the challenged guard? If the

entire hour were given to the whole of Act I and all the questions

sought to reveal to the students Shakespeare's power of dramatic

structure, a definite and lasting impression would be carried away.

College Teaching Studies in Methods of Teaching in the College · 第 1 / 11 章