Haydn's Crowning Achievement--"The Creation" suggested--The
"Unintelligible Jargon" of the Libretto--The Stimulating Effect
of London--Haydn's Self-Criticism--First Performance of "The
Creation"--London Performances--French Enthusiasm--The Oratorio
criticized--"The Seasons."
Haydn's Crowning Achievement
Haydn rounded his life with "The Creation" and "The Seasons." They
were the summit of his achievement, as little to be expected from
him, considering his years, as "Falstaff" was to be expected from the
octogenarian Verdi. Some geniuses flower late. It was only now, by his
London symphonies and his "Creation," that Haydn's genius blossomed so
luxuriantly as to place him with almost amazing suddenness among the
very first of composers. There is hardly anything more certain than
this, that if he had not come to London he would not have stood where he
stands to-day. The best of his symphonies were written for London;
and it was London, in effect, that set him to work in what was for him
practically a new direction, leading to the production of an oratorio
which at once took its place by the side of Handel's master-pieces, and
rose to a popularity second only to that of "The Messiah" itself.
"The Creation" suggested
The connection thus established between the names of Handel and Haydn
is interesting, for there can be little question that Haydn was led to
think of writing a large choral work chiefly as the result of frequently
hearing Handel's oratorios during his visits to the metropolis. The
credit of suggesting "The Creation" to Haydn is indeed assigned to
Salomon, but it is more than probable that the matter had already been
occupying his thoughts. It has been explicitly stated [See note by C.H.
Purday in Leisure Hour for 1880, p. 528.] that, being greatly impressed
with the effect produced by "The Messiah," Haydn intimated to his friend
Barthelemon his desire to compose a work of the same kind. He asked
Barthelemon what subject he would advise for such a purpose, and
Barthelemon, pointing to a copy of the Bible, replied: "There! take
that, and begin at the beginning." This story is told on apparently good
authority. But it hardly fits in with the statements of biographers.
According to the biographers, Salomon handed the composer a libretto
originally selected for Handel from Genesis and Paradise Lost by Mr
Lidley or Liddell. That this was the libretto used by Haydn is certain,
and we may therefore accept it as a fact that Haydn's most notable
achievement in choral music was due in great measure to the man who
had brought him to London, and had drawn from him the finest of his
instrumental works.
"The Creation" Libretto
Before proceeding further we may deal finally with the libretto of "The
Creation." The "unintelligible jargon" which disfigures Haydn's immortal
work has often formed the subject of comment; and assuredly nothing that
can be said of it can well be too severe. "The Creation" libretto stands
to the present day as an example of all that is jejune and incongruous
in words for music. The theme has in itself so many elements of
inspiration that it is a matter for wonder how, for more than a century,
English-speaking audiences have listened to the arrant nonsense with
which Haydn's music is associated. As has been well observed, "the
suburban love-making of our first parents, and the lengthy references
to the habits of the worm and the leviathan are almost more than modern
flesh and blood can endure." Many years ago a leading musical critic
wrote that there ought to be enough value, monetarily speaking, in "The
Creation" to make it worth while preparing a fresh libretto; for,
said he, "the present one seems only fit for the nursery, to use in
connection with Noah's ark." At the Norwich Festival performance of
the oratorio in 1872, the words were, in fact, altered, but in all the
published editions of the work the text remains as it was. It is
usual to credit the composer's friend, Baron van Swieten, with the
"unintelligible jargon." The baron certainly had a considerable hand
in the adaptation of the text. But in reality it owes its very uncouth
verbiage largely to the circumstance that it was first translated from
English into German, and then re-translated back into English; the
words, with the exception of the first chorus, being adapted to the
music. Considering the ways of translators, the best libretto in the
world could not but have suffered under such transformations, and it is
doing a real injustice to the memory of Baron Swieten, the good friend
of more than one composer, to hold him up needlessly to ridicule. [In
one of George Thomson's letters to Mrs Hunter we read: "It it is not
the first time that your muse and Haydn's have met, as we see from the
beautiful canzonets. Would he had been directed by you about the words
to 'The Creation'! It is lamentable to see such divine music joined with
such miserable broken English. He (Haydn) wrote me lately that in three
years, by the performance of 'The Creation' and 'The Seasons' at Vienna,
40,000 florins had been raised for the poor families of musicians."]
The Stimulus of London
Haydn set to work on "The Creation" with all the ardour of a first love.
Naumann suggests that his high spirits were due to the "enthusiastic
plaudits of the English people," and that the birth of both "The
Creation" and "The Seasons" was "unquestionably owing to the new man
he felt within himself after his visit to England." There was now, in
short, burning within his breast, "a spirit of conscious strength which
he knew not he possessed, or knowing, was unaware of its true worth."
This is somewhat exaggerated. Handel wrote "The Messiah" in twenty-four
days; it took Haydn the best part of eighteen months to complete "The
Creation," from which we may infer that "the sad laws of time" had not
stopped their operation simply because he had been to London. No doubt,
as we have already more than hinted, he was roused and stimulated by the
new scenes and the unfamiliar modes of life which he saw and experienced
in England. His temporary release from the fetters of official life had
also an exhilarating influence. So much we learn indeed from himself.
Thus, writing from London to Frau von Genzinger, he says: "Oh, my dear,
good lady, how sweet is some degree of liberty! I had a kind prince, but
was obliged at times to be dependent on base souls. I often sighed for
freedom, and now I have it in some measure. I am quite sensible of this
benefit, though my mind is burdened with more work. The consciousness of
being no longer a bond-servant sweetens all my toils." If this liberty,
this contact with new people and new forms of existence, had come to
Haydn twenty years earlier, it might have altered the whole current of
his career. But it did not help him much in the actual composition of
"The Creation," which he found rather a tax, alike on his inspiration
and his physical powers. Writing to Breitkopf & Hartel on June 12, 1799,
he says: "The world daily pays me many compliments, even on the fire of
my last works; but no one could believe the strain and effort it costs
me to produce these, inasmuch as many a day my feeble memory and the
unstrung state of my nerves so completely crush me to the earth, that
I fall into the most melancholy condition, so much so that for days
afterwards I am incapable of finding one single idea, till at length
my heart is revived by Providence, when I seat myself at the piano and
begin once more to hammer away at it. Then all goes well again, God be
praised!"
Self-Criticism
In the same letter he remarks that, "as for myself, now an old man, I
hope the critics may not handle my 'Creation' with too great severity,
and be too hard on it. They may perhaps find the musical orthography
faulty in various passages, and perhaps other things also which I have
for so many years been accustomed to consider as minor points; but the
genuine connoisseur will see the real cause as readily as I do, and will
willingly cast aside such stumbling blocks." It is impossible to miss
the significance of all this.
[At this point in the original book, a facsimile of a letter regarding
"The Creation" takes up the entire next page.]
Certainly it ought to be taken into account in any critical estimate
of "The Creation"; for when a man admits his own shortcomings it is
ungracious, to say the least, for an outsider to insist upon them. It is
obvious at any rate that Haydn undertook the composition of the oratorio
in no light-hearted spirit. "Never was I so pious," he says, "as when
composing 'The Creation.' I felt myself so penetrated with religious
feeling that before I sat down to the pianoforte I prayed to God with
earnestness that He would enable me to praise Him worthily." In the
lives of the great composers there is only one parallel to this frame of
mind--the religious fervour in which Handel composed "The Messiah."
First Performance of the Oratorio
The first performance of "The Creation" was of a purely private nature.
It took place at the Schwartzenburg Palace, Vienna, on the 29th of April
1798, the performers being a body of dilettanti, with Haydn presiding
over the orchestra. Van Swieten had been exerting himself to raise
a guarantee fund for the composer, and the entire proceeds of the
performance, amounting to 350 pounds, were paid over to him. Haydn was
unable to describe his sensations during the progress of the work. "One
moment," he says, "I was as cold as ice, the next I seemed on fire; more
than once I thought I should have a fit." A year later, on the 19th
of March 1799, to give the exact date, the oratorio was first heard
publicly at the National Theatre in Vienna, when it produced the
greatest effect. The play-bill announcing the performance (see next
page) had a very ornamental border, and was, of course, in German.
[At this point in the original book, a facsimile of the first play-bill
for "The Creation" takes up the entire next page.]
Next year the score was published by Breitkopf & Hartel, and no fewer
than 510 copies, nearly half the number subscribed for, came to England.
The title-page was printed both in German and English, the latter
reading as follows: "The Creation: an Oratorio composed by Joseph Haydn,
Doctor of Musik, and member of the Royal Society of Musik, in Sweden,
in actuel (sic) service of His Highness the Prince of Esterhazy, Vienna,
1800." Clementi had just set up a musical establishment in London, and
on August 22, 1800, we find Haydn writing to his publishers to
complain that he was in some danger of losing 2000 gulden by Clementi's
non-receipt of a consignment of copies.
London Performances
Salomon, strangely enough, had threatened Haydn with penalties for
pirating his text, but he thought better of the matter, and now wrote
to the composer for a copy of the score, so that he might produce the
oratorio in London. He was, however, forestalled by Ashley, who was at
that time giving performances of oratorio at Covent Garden Theatre, and
who brought forward the new work on the 28th of March (1800). An amusing
anecdote is told in this connection. The score arrived by a King's
messenger from Vienna on Saturday, March 22, at nine o'clock in the
evening. It was handed to Thomas Goodwin, the copyist of the theatre,
who immediately had the parts copied out for 120 performers. The
performance was on the Friday evening following, and when Mr Harris, the
proprietor of the theatre, complimented all parties concerned on their
expedition, Goodwin, with ready wit, replied: "Sir, we have humbly
emulated a great example; it is not the first time that the Creation has
been completed in six days." Salomon followed on the 21st of April
with a performance at the King's Theatre, Mara and Dussek taking the
principal parts. Mara remarked that it was the first time she had
accompanied an orchestra!
French Enthusiasm
Strange to say--for oratorio has never been much at home in France--"The
Creation" was received with immense enthusiasm in Paris when it was
first performed there in the summer of this same year. Indeed, the
applause was so great that the artists, in a fit of transport, and to
show their personal regard for the composer, resolved to present him
with a large gold medal. The medal was designed by the famous engraver,
Gateaux. It was adorned on one side with a likeness of Haydn, and on
the other side with an ancient lyre, over which a flame flickered in the
midst of a circle of stars. The inscription ran: "Homage a Haydn par les
Musiciens qui ont execute l'oratorio de la Creation du Monde au Theatre
des Arts l'au ix de la Republique Francais ou MDCCC." The medal was
accompanied by a eulogistic address, to which the recipient duly replied
in a rather flowery epistle. "I have often," he wrote, "doubted whether
my name would survive me, but your goodness inspires me with confidence,
and the token of esteem with which you have honoured me perhaps
justifies my hope that I shall not wholly die. Yes, gentlemen, you have
crowned my gray hairs, and strewn flowers on the brink of my grave."
Seven years after this Haydn received another medal from Paris--from
the Societe Academique des Enfants d'Apollon, who had elected him an
honorary member.
A second performance of "The Creation" took place in the French capital
on December 24, 1800, when Napoleon I. escaped the infernal machine in
the Rue Nicaise. It was, however, in England, the home of oratorio, that
the work naturally took firmest root. It was performed at the Worcester
Festival of 1800, at the Hereford Festival of the following year, and
at Gloucester in 1802. Within a few years it had taken its place by the
side of Handel's best works of the kind, and its popularity remained
untouched until Mendelssohn's "Elijah" was heard at Birmingham in 1847.
Even now, although it has lost something of its old-time vogue, it is
still to be found in the repertory of our leading choral societies. It
is said that when a friend urged Haydn to hurry the completion of the
oratorio, he replied: "I spend much time over it because I intend it
to last a long time." How delighted he would have been could he have
foreseen that it would still be sung and listened to with pleasure in
the early years of the twentieth century.
"The Creation" criticized
No one thinks of dealing critically with the music of "The Messiah"; and
it seems almost as thankless a task to take the music of "The Creation"
to pieces. Schiller called it a "meaningless hotch-potch"; and even
Beethoven, though he was not quite innocent of the same thing himself,
had his sardonic laugh over its imitations of beasts and birds.
Critics of the oratorio seldom fail to point out these "natural history
effects"--to remark on "the sinuous motion of the worm," "the graceful
gamboling of the leviathan," the orchestral imitations of the bellowing
of the "heavy beasts," and such like. It is probably indefensible on
purely artistic grounds. But Handel did it in "Israel in Egypt" and
elsewhere. And is there not a crowing cock in Bach's "St Matthew
Passion"? Haydn only followed the example of his predecessors.
Of course, the dispassionate critic cannot help observing that there is
in "The Creation" a good deal of music which is finicking and something
which is trumpery. But there is also much that is first-rate. The
instrumental representation of chaos, for example, is excellent, and
nothing in all the range of oratorio produces a finer effect than the
soft voices at the words, "And the Spirit of God moved upon the face
of the waters." Even the fortissimo C major chord on the word "light,"
coming abruptly after the piano and mezzoforte minor chords, is as
dazzling to-day as it was when first sung. It has been said that the
work is singularly deficient in sustained choruses. That is true, if we
are comparing it with the choruses of Handel's oratorios. But Haydn's
style is entirely different from that of Handel. His choruses are
designed on a much less imposing scale. They are more reflective or
descriptive, much less dramatic. It was not in his way "to strike like a
thunderbolt," as Mozart said of Handel. The descriptive effects which
he desired to introduce into his orchestration made it necessary that he
should throw the vocal element into a simpler mould. Allowance must
be made for these differences. Haydn could never have written "The
Messiah," but, on the other hand, Handel could never have written "The
Creation."
The chief beauty of Haydn's work lies in its airs for the solo voices.
While never giving consummate expression to real and deep emotion, much
less sustained thought, they are never wanting in sincerity, and the
melody and the style are as pure and good as those of the best Italian
writing for the stage. With all our advance it is impossible to resist
the freshness of "With verdure clad," and the tender charm of such
settings as that of "Softly purling, glides on, thro' silent vales, the
limpid brook." On the whole, however, it is difficult to sum up a work
like "The Creation," unless, as has been cynically remarked, one is
prepared to call it great and never go to hear it. It is not sublime,
but neither is it dull. In another fifty years, perhaps, the critic will
be able to say that its main interest is largely historic and literary.
[See J. F. Runciman's Old Scores and New Readings, where an admirably
just and concise appreciation of Haydn and "The Creation" may be read.]
A New Work
After such an unexpected success as that of "The Creation," it was only
in the nature of things that Haydn's friends should persuade him to
undertake the composition of a second work of the kind. Van Swieten was
insistent, and the outcome of his importunity was "The Seasons." This
work is generally classed as an oratorio, but it ought more properly
to be called a cantata, being essentially secular as regards its text,
though the form and style are practically the same as those of "The
Creation." The libretto was again due to Swieten, who, of course,
adapted the text from James Thomson's well-known poem.
"The Seasons"
It would certainly have been a pity to lose such a fresh, melodious
little work as "The Seasons"; but it is only too apparent that while
there was no appreciable failure of Haydn's creative force, his physical
strength was not equal to the strain involved by a composition of
such length. In 1806, when Dies found him rather weaker than usual, he
dolorously remarked: "You see it is all over with me. Eight years ago it
was different, but 'The Seasons' brought on this weakness. I ought
never to have undertaken that work. It gave me the finishing stroke."
He appears to have started on the work with great reluctance and with
considerable distrust of his own powers, but once fairly committed to
the undertaking he entered into it with something of his old animation,
disputing so manfully with his librettist over certain points in the
text that a serious rupture between the two was at one time imminent.
The subject was probably not very congenial to Haydn, who, as the years
advanced, was more and more inclined towards devotional themes. That
at least seems to be the inference to be drawn from the remark which he
made to the Emperor Francis on being asked which of his two oratorios he
himself preferred. "'The Creation,'" answered Haydn. "In 'The Creation'
angels speak and their talk is of God; in 'The Seasons' no one higher
speaks than Farmer Simon."
"The Seasons" criticized
But whether he liked the theme or not, in the end he produced a work as
fresh and genial and melodious as if it had been the work of his prime.
If anyone sees in it an evidence of weakness, he is seeing only what he
had expected to see. As Mr Rockstro remarks, not a trace of the "failing
power" of which the grand old man complained is to be found in any part
of it. It is a model of descriptive, contemplative work, and must please
by its thoughtful beauty and illustrative power. True to Nature in
its minutest details, it yet never insults her by trivial attempts at
outward imitation where artistic suggestion of the hidden truth was,
possible. The "delicious softness" of the opening chorus, and the
perfection of rustic happiness portrayed in the song which describes the
joy of the "impatient husbandman" are alone sufficient to prove that,
whatever he may have thought about it himself, Haydn's genius was not
appreciably waning.
The first performance of "The Seasons" took place at the Schwartzenburg
Palace on the 24th of April 1801. It was repeated twice within a week;
and on the 29th of May the composer conducted a grand public performance
at the Redoutensaal. The work proved almost as successful as "The
Creation." Haydn was enraptured with it, but he was never really himself
again. As he said, it gave him the finishing stroke.