KING HENRY IV., PART I.

I commend Sir HERBERT TREE'S obvious desire to do his duty as an

actor-manager and a patriot. His true intent is all for our good; and

he supports his choice of a play in which _Falstaff_ is the central

obsession by a printed quotation from the words of "That Wise Ruler

Queen Elizabeth of England," where she says: "'Tis simple mirth

keepeth high courage alive." But yet he does not convince me that he

has chosen wisely here. For in the first place we are not closely

interested in civil war, as we came near to being in the dim Ulster

period; and patriotism, which it is his object to encourage, is like

to remain unaffected by a play in which our sympathies are fairly

distributed between rebel and royalist. In the second place I cannot

believe that the glorification of drunkenness and braggadocio in the

person of _Falstaff_ can directly assist the cause (which at this

moment needs all the help it can get) of sobriety and self-respect.

[Illustration: _The King_ (Mr. BASIL GILL) reclaims young _Harry_ (Mr.

OWEN NARES) from old _Harry_ (the Devil).]

Having made this protest I have little but praise for the performance

itself, though I think Sir HERBERT TREE'S own lethargy was not wholly

to be excused by the hampering rotundity of his girth; and that all

this deliberate sword-play, where you wait till your enemy has got his

right guard before you arrange a concussion between your weapon and

his, fails to impose itself as an image of War. But it was no fault of

the actors if we suffered a further loss of actuality by the

incredible amount of fine poetry and rhetoric thrown off by military

men at junctures calling for immediate action.

I also venture to make my complaint to the author that the _Falstaff_

scenes are given too great a dominance, diverting us from the main

issue so long that at one time we almost lost count of it; and that

the picture of that fat impostor lying supine in a simulation of death

within a few feet of the fallen body of the heroic _Hotspur_ was

repellent to one's sense of the proprieties.

Mr. MATHESON LANG was a brave figure as _Hotspur_; but, after lately

seeing that other keen actor, Mr. OWEN NARES, in the part of a modern

intellectual discussing the ethics of War, I could not quite get

myself to believe in him as _Prince Hal_. He spoke some of his lines

with a fine ardour, but he was too high-browed and slight of body, and

it was unthinkable that he could ever have persuaded _Hotspur_ to die

at his hands.

Sir HERBERT TREE affected an almost proprietary interest in the

bibulous humours of _Falstaff_, presenting them with an easy and

leisurely restraint; and Mr. BASIL GILL both in form and manner made a

quite good _King_. The minor parts upheld the standard of His

Majesty's; and a pleasant rattling of steel and shimmer of mail ran

through the scenes of active service. Mr. PERCY MACQUOID had seen to

it that the period was there, and Mr. JOSEPH HARKER had taken good

care that the jewelry of SHAKSPEARE'S verse should have the right

setting, though I could easily have mistaken his Gadshill scene for a

section of the Lake Country.

Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 147, November 25, 1914 · 第 13 / 39 题