II

It was knock-down and drag-out theology, the ruthless machinery of

organized churchism--the rank materialism of things temporal--not the

teachings of Christ and the spirit of the Christian religion--which so long

filled the world with blood and tears.

I have often in talking with intelligent Jews expressed a wonder that they

should stigmatize the most illustrious Jew as an impostor, saying to them:

"What matters it whether Jesus was of divine or human parentage--a human

being or an immortal spirit? He was a Jew: a glorious, unoffending Jew,

done to death by a mob of hoodlums in Jerusalem. Why should not you and I

call him Master and kneel together in love and pity at his feet?"

Never have I received any satisfying answer. Partyism--churchism--will

ever stick to its fetish. Too many churches--or, shall I say, church

fabrics--breeding controversy where there should be agreement, each sect

and subdivision fighting phantoms of its fancy. In the city that once

proclaimed itself eternal there is war between the Quirinal and the

Vatican, the government of Italy and the papal hierarchy. In France the

government of the republic and the Church of Rome are at daggers-drawn.

Before the world-war England and Germany--each claiming to be

Protestant--were looking on askance, irresolute, not as to which side might

be right and which wrong, but on which side "is my bread to be buttered?"

In America, where it was said by the witty Frenchmen we have fifty

religions and only one soup, there are people who think we should begin

to organize to stop the threatened coming of the Pope, and such like! "O

Liberty," cried Madame Roland, "how many crimes are committed in thy name!"

"O Churchism," may I not say, "how much nonsense is trolled off in thy

name!"

I would think twice before trusting the wisest and best of men with

absolute power; but I would trust never any body of men--never any

Sanhedrim, consistory, church congress or party convention--with absolute

power. Honest men are often led to do or to assent, in association, what

they would disdain upon their conscience and responsibility as individuals.

_En masse_ extremism generally prevails, and extremism is always

wrong; it is the more wrong and the more dangerous because it is rarely

wanting for plausible sophistries, furnishing congenial and convincing

argument to the mind of the unthinking for whatever it has to propose.

Marse Henry: An Autobiography (Volume 2) · 第 117 / 120 题