I said in answer:

Louisville, July 22, 1892.--My Dear Sir: I do not see how you could

misunderstand the spirit in which I wrote, or be offended by my plain

words. They were addressed as from one friend to another, as from one

Democrat to another. If you entertain the idea that this is a false view

of our relative positions, and that your eminence lifts you above both

comradeship and counsels, I have nothing to say except to regret that, in

underestimating your breadth of character I exposed myself too contumely.

You do, indeed, ride a wave of fortune and favor. You are quite beyond

the reach of insult, real or fancied. You could well afford to be more

tolerant.

In answer to the ignorance of my service to the Democratic party, which you

are at such pains to indicate--and, particularly, with reference to the

sectional issue and the issue of tariff reform--I might, if I wanted to be

unamiable, suggest to you a more attentive perusal of the proceedings of

the three national conventions which nominated you for President.

But I purpose nothing of the sort. In the last five national conventions my

efforts were decisive in framing the platform of the party. In each of them

I closed the debate, moved the previous question and was sustained by the

convention. In all of them, except the last, I was a maker, not a smasher.

Touching what happened at Chicago, the present year, I had a right, in

common with good Democrats, to be anxious; and out of that sense of anxiety

alone I wrote you. I am sorry that my temerity was deemed by you intrusive

and, entering a respectful protest against a ban which I cannot believe to

be deserved by me, and assuring you that I shall not again trouble you in

that way, I am, your obedient servant,

Marse Henry: An Autobiography (Volume 2) · 第 75 / 120 题