Chapter VII

The Subjugation of the West

The Romanizing of the West

When the course of history turns from the miserable monotony

of the political selfishness, which fought its battles

in the senate-house and in the streets of the capital, to matters

of greater importance than the question whether the first monarch

of Rome should be called Gnaeus, Gaius, or Marcus, we may well

be allowed--on the threshold of an event, the effects of which still

at the present day influence the destinies of the world--to look round us

for a moment, and to indicate the point of view under which the conquest

of what is now France by the Romans, and their first contact

with the inhabitants of Germany and of Great Britain, are to be

apprehended in their bearing on the general history of the world.

By virtue of the law, that a people which has grown into a state

absorbs its neighbours who are in political nonage, and a civilized

people absorbs its neighbours who are in intellectual nonage--

by virtue of this law, which is as universally valid and as much

a law of nature as the law of gravity--the Italian nation (the only

one in antiquity which was able to combine a superior political

development and a superior civilization, though it presented

the latter only in an imperfect and external manner) was entitled

to reduce to subjection the Greek states of the east which were ripe

for destruction, and to dispossess the peoples of lower grades

of culture in the west--Libyans, Iberians, Celts, Germans--by means

of its settlers; just as England with equal right has in Asia reduced

to subjection a civilization of rival standing but politically

impotent, and in America and Australia has marked and ennobled,

and still continues to mark and ennoble, extensive barbarian

countries with the impress of its nationality. The Roman aristocracy

had accomplished the preliminary condition required for this task--

the union of Italy; the task itself it never solved, but always

regarded the extra-Italian conquests either as simply a necessary

evil, or as a fiscal possession virtually beyond the pale

of the state. It is the imperishable glory of the Roman democracy

or monarchy--for the two coincide--to have correctly apprehended

and vigorously realized this its highest destination. What

the irresistible force of circumstances had paved the way for,

through the senate establishing against its will the foundations

of the future Roman dominion in the west as in the east; what thereafter

the Roman emigration to the provinces--which came as a public

calamity, no doubt, but also in the western regions at any rate

as a pioneer of a higher culture--pursued as matter of instinct;

the creator of the Roman democracy, Gaius Gracchus, grasped

and began to carry out with statesmanlike clearness and decision.

The two fundamental ideas of the new policy--to reunite

the territories under the power of Rome, so far as they were Hellenic,

and to colonize them, so far as they were not Hellenic--had already

in the Gracchan age been practically recognized by the annexation

of the kingdom of Attalus and by the Transalpine conquests of Flaccus:

but the prevailing reaction once more arrested their application.

The Roman state remained a chaotic mass of countries without thorough

occupation and without proper limits. Spain and the Graeco-Asiatic

possessions were separated from the mother country by wide

territories, of which barely the borders along the coast

were subject to the Romans; on the north coast of Africa the domains

of Carthage and Cyrene alone were occupied like oases; large tracts

even of the subject territory, especially in Spain, were but nominally

subject to the Romans. Absolutely nothing was done on the part

of the government towards concentrating and rounding off

their dominion, and the decay of the fleet seemed at length

to dissolve the last bond of connection between the distant

possessions. The democracy no doubt attempted, so soon as it

again raised its head, to shape its external policy in the spirit

of Gracchus--Marius in particular cherished such ideas--but as it

did not for any length of time attain the helm, its projects

were left unfulfilled. It was not till the democracy practically took

in hand the government on the overthrow of the Sullan constitution

in 684, that a revolution in this respect occurred. First of all

their sovereignty on the Mediterranean was restored--the most

vital question for a state like that of Rome. Towards the east,

moreover, the boundary of the Euphrates was secured by the annexation

of the provinces of Pontus and Syria. But there still remained beyond

the Alps the task of at once rounding off the Roman territory towards

the north and west, and of gaining a fresh virgin soil there

for Hellenic civilization and for the yet unbroken vigour

of the Italic race.

Historical Significance of the Conquests of Caesar

This task Gaius Caesar undertook. It is more than an error,

it is an outrage upon the sacred spirit dominant in history,

to regard Gaul solely as the parade ground on which Caesar

exercised himself and his legions for the impending civil war.

Though the subjugation of the west was for Caesar so far a means

to an end that he laid the foundations of his later height of power

in the Transalpine wars, it is the especial privilege of a statesman

of genius that his means themselves are ends in their turn. Caesar

needed no doubt for his party aims a military power, but he did not

conquer Gaul as a partisan. There was a direct political necessity

for Rome to meet the perpetually threatened invasion of the Germans

thus early beyond the Alps, and to construct a rampart there

which should secure the peace of the Roman world. But even this

important object was not the highest and ultimate reason for which Gaul

was conquered by Caesar. When the old home had become too

narrow for the Roman burgesses and they were in danger of decay,

the senate's policy of Italian conquest saved them from ruin.

Now the Italian home had become in its turn too narrow; once more

the state languished under the same social evils repeating themselves

in similar fashion only on a greater scale. It was a brilliant

idea, a grand hope, which led Caesar over the Alps--the idea

and the confident expectation that he should gain there for his

fellow-burgesses a new boundless home, and regenerate the state

a second time by placing it on a broader basis.

Caesar in Spain

The campaign which Caesar undertook in 693 in Further Spain, may

be in some sense included among the enterprises which aimed at

the subjugation of the west. Long as Spain had obeyed the Romans,

its western shore had remained substantially independent of them

even after the expedition of Decimus Brutus against the Callaeci(1),

and they had not even set foot on the northern coast; while

the predatory raids, to which the subject provinces found

themselves continually exposed from those quarters, did no small

injury to the civilization and Romanizing of Spain. Against these

the expedition of Caesar along the west coast was directed.

He crossed the chain of the Herminian mountains (Sierra de Estrella)

bounding the Tagus on the north; after having conquered their

inhabitants and transplanted them in part to the plain, he reduced

the country on both sides of the Douro and arrived at the northwest

point of the peninsula, where with the aid of a flotilla brought

up from Gades he occupied Brigantium (Corunna). By this means

the peoples adjoining the Atlantic Ocean, Lusitanians and Callaecians,

were forced to acknowledge the Roman supremacy, while the conqueror

was at the same time careful to render the position of the subjects

generally more tolerable by reducing the tribute to be paid to Rome

and regulating the financial affairs of the communities.

But, although in this military and administrative debut of the great

general and statesman the same talents and the same leading ideas are

discernible which he afterwards evinced on a greater stage, his agency

in the Iberian peninsula was much too transient to have any deep effect;

the more especially as, owing to its physical and national peculiarities,

nothing but action steadily continued for a considerable time could

exert any durable influence there.

Gaul

A more important part in the Romanic development of the west

was reserved by destiny for the country which stretches between

the Pyrenees and the Rhine, the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean,

and which since the Augustan age has been especially designated

by the name of the land of the Celts--Gallia--although strictly

speaking the land of the Celts was partly narrower, partly much

more extensive, and the country so called never formed a national

unity, and did not form a political unity before Augustus.

For this very reason it is not easy to present a clear picture

of the very heterogeneous state of things which Caesar encountered

on his arrival there in 696.

The Roman Province

Wars and Revolts There

In the region on the Mediterranean, which, embracing approximately

Languedoc on the west of the Rhone, on the east Dauphine and Provence,

had been for sixty years a Roman province, the Roman arms had seldom

been at rest since the Cimbrian invasion which had swept over it.

In 664 Gaius Caelius had fought with the Salyes about Aquae Sextiae,

and in 674 Gaius Flaccus,(2) on his march to Spain, with other

Celtic nations. When in the Sertorian war the governor Lucius Manlius,

compelled to hasten to the aid of his colleagues beyond the Pyrenees,

returned defeated from Ilerda (Lerida) and on his way home

was vanquished a second time by the western neighbours

of the Roman province, the Aquitani (about 676;(3)), this seems

to have provoked a general rising of the provincials between

the Pyrenees and the Rhone, perhaps even of those between the Rhone

and Alps. Pompeius had to make his way with the sword through

the insurgent Gaul to Spain,(4) and by way of penalty for their

rebellion gave the territories of the Volcae-Arecomici

and the Helvii (dep. Gard and Ardeche) over to the Massiliots;

the governor Manius Fonteius (678-680) carried out these arrangements

and restored tranquillity in the province by subduing the Vocontii

(dep. Drome), protecting Massilia from the insurgents,

and liberating the Roman capital Narbo which they invested.

Despair, however, and the financial embarrassment which the participation

in the sufferings of the Spanish war(5) and generally the official

and non-official exactions of the Romans brought upon the Gallic

provinces, did not allow them to be tranquil; and in particular

the canton of the Allobroges, the most remote from Narbo,

was in a perpetual ferment, which was attested by the "pacification"

that Gaius Piso undertook there in 688 as well as by the behaviour

of the Allobrogian embassy in Rome on occasion of the anarchist plot

in 691,(6) and which soon afterwards (693) broke into open revolt

Catugnatus the leader of the Allobroges in this war of despair,

who had at first fought not unsuccessfully, was conquered at Solonium

after a glorious resistance by the governor Gaius Pomptinus.

Bounds

Relations to Rome

Notwithstanding all these conflicts the bounds of the Roman

territory were not materially advanced; Lugudunum Convenarum,

where Pompeius had settled the remnant of the Sertorian army,(7)

Tolosa, Vienna and Genava were still the most remote Roman townships

towards the west and north. But at the same time the importance

of these Gallic possessions for the mother country was continually

on the increase. The glorious climate, akin to that of Italy,

the favourable nature of the soil, the large and rich region lying

behind so advantageous for commerce with its mercantile routes

reaching as far as Britain, the easy intercourse by land and sea

with the mother country, rapidly gave to southern Gaul an economic

importance for Italy, which much older possessions, such as those

in Spain, had not acquired in the course of centuries; and as

the Romans who had suffered political shipwreck at this period sought

an asylum especially in Massilia, and there found once more Italian

culture and Italian luxury, voluntary emigrants from Italy also

were attracted more and more to the Rhone and the Garonne.

"The province of Gaul," it was said in a sketch drawn ten years

before Caesar's arrival, "is full of merchants; it swarms with Roman

burgesses. No native of Gaul transacts a piece of business without

the intervention of a Roman; every penny, that passes from one hand

to another in Gaul, goes through the account books of the Roman

burgesses." From the same description it appears that in addition

to the colonists of Narbo there were Romans cultivating land

and rearing cattle, resident in great numbers in Gaul; as to which,

however, it must not be overlooked that most of the provincial land

possessed by Romans, just like the greater part of the English

possessions in the earliest times in America, was in the hands

of the high nobility living in Italy, and those farmers and graziers

consisted for the most part of their stewards--slaves or freedmen.

Incipient Romanizing

It is easy to understand how under such circumstances civilization

and Romanizing rapidly spread among the natives. These Celts

were not fond of agriculture; but their new masters compelled them

to exchange the sword for the plough, and it is very credible

that the embittered resistance of the Allobroges was provoked in part

by some such injunctions. In earlier times Hellenism had also

to a certain degree dominated those regions; the elements

of a higher culture, the stimulus to the cultivation of the vine

and the olive,(8) to the use of writing(9) and to the coining of money,

came to them from Massilia. The Hellenic culture was in this case

far from being set aside by the Romans; Massilia gained through

them more influence than it lost; and even in the Roman period

Greek physicians and rhetoricians were publicly employed

in the Gallic cantons. But, as may readily be conceived, Hellenism

in southern Gaul acquired through the agency of the Romans the same

character as in Italy; the distinctively Hellenic civilization

gave place to the Latino-Greek mixed culture, which soon made

proselytes here in great numbers. The "Gauls in the breeches,"

as the inhabitants of southern Gaul were called by way of contrast

to the "Gauls in the toga" of northern Italy, were not indeed

like the latter already completely Romanized, but they were even now

very perceptibly distinguished from the "longhaired Gauls"

of the northern regions still unsubdued. The semiculture becoming

naturalized among them furnished, doubtless, materials enough

for ridicule of their barbarous Latin, and people did not fail

to suggest to any one suspected of Celtic descent his "relationship

with the breeches"; but this bad Latin was yet sufficient

to enable even the remote Allobroges to transact business

with the Roman authorities, and even to give testimony in the Roman

courts without an interpreter.

While the Celtic and Ligurian population of these regions

was thus in the course of losing its nationality, and was languishing

and pining withal under a political and economic oppression,

the intolerable nature of which is sufficiently attested by their

hopeless insurrections, the decline of the native population here

went hand in hand with the naturalizing of the same higher culture

which we find at this period in Italy. Aquae Sextiae and still

more Narbo were considerable townships, which might probably be

named by the side of Beneventum and Capua; and Massilia, the best

organized, most free, most capable of self-defence, and most

powerful of all the Greek cities dependent on Rome, under its

rigorous aristocratic government to which the Roman conservatives

probably pointed as the model of a good urban constitution,

in possession of an important territory which had been considerably

enlarged by the Romans and of an extensive trade, stood by the side

of those Latin towns as Rhegium and Neapolis stood in Italy

by the side of Beneventum and Capua.

Free Gaul

Matters wore a different aspect, when one crossed the Roman frontier.

The great Celtic nation, which in the southern districts already

began to be crushed by the Italian immigration, still moved

to the north of the Cevennes in its time-hallowed freedom.

It is not the first time that we meet it: the Italians had already

fought with the offsets and advanced posts of this vast stock

on the Tiber and on the Po, in the mountains of Castile and Carinthia,

and even in the heart of Asia Minor; but it was here that the main stock

was first assailed at its very core by their attacks. The Celtic race

had on its settlement in central Europe diffused itself chiefly

over the rich river-valleys and the pleasant hill-country

of the present France, including the western districts of Germany

and Switzerland, and from thence had occupied at least the southern

part of England, perhaps even at this time all Great Britain

and Ireland;(10) it formed here more than anywhere else a broad,

geographically compact, mass of peoples. In spite of

the differences in language and manners which naturally

were to be found within this wide territory, a close mutual intercourse,

an innate sense of fellowship, seems to have knit together

the tribes from the Rhone and Garonne to the Rhine and the Thames;

whereas, although these doubtless were in a certain measure locally

connected with the Celts in Spain and in the modern Austria,

the mighty mountain barriers of the Pyrenees and the Alps

on the one hand, and the encroachments of the Romans and the Germans

which also operated here on the other, interrupted the intercourse

and the intrinsic connection of the cognate peoples far otherwise

than the narrow arm of the sea interrupted the relations

of the continental and the British Celts. Unhappily we are not

permitted to trace stage by stage the history of the internal development

of this remarkable people in these its chief seats; we must be content

with presenting at least some outline of its historical culture

and political condition, as it here meets us in the time of Caesar.

Population

Agriculture and the Rearing of Cattle

Gaul was, according to the reports of the ancients, comparatively

well peopled. Certain statements lead us to infer that in the Belgic

districts there were some 200 persons to the square mile--

a proportion such as nearly holds at present for Wales

and for Livonia--in the Helvetic canton about 245;(11) it is probable

that in the districts which were more cultivated than the Belgic

and less mountainous than the Helvetian, as among the Bituriges,

Arverni, Haedui, the number rose still higher. Agriculture

was no doubt practised in Gaul--for even the contemporaries of Caesar

were surprised in the region of the Rhine by the custom of manuring

with marl,(12) and the primitive Celtic custom of preparing beer

(-cervesia-) from barley is likewise an evidence of the early

and wide diffusion of the culture of grain--but it was not held

in estimation. Even in the more civilized south it was reckoned not

becoming for the free Celts to handle the plough. In far higher

estimation among the Celts stood pastoral husbandry, for which

the Roman landholders of this epoch very gladly availed themselves

both of the Celtic breed of cattle, and of the brave Celtic slaves

skilled in riding and familiar with the rearing of animals.(13)

Particularly in the northern Celtic districts pastoral husbandry

was thoroughly predominant. Brittany was in Caesar's time

a country poor in corn. In the north-east dense forests, attaching

themselves to the heart of the Ardennes, stretched almost without

interruption from the German Ocean to the Rhine; and on the plains

of Flanders and Lorraine, now so fertile, the Menapian and Treverian

herdsman then fed his half-wild swine in the impenetrable oak-forest.

Just as in the valley of the Po the Romans made the production

of wool and the culture of corn supersede the Celtic feeding

of pigs on acorns, so the rearing of sheep and the agriculture

in the plains of the Scheldt and the Maas are traceable

to their influence. In Britain even the threshing of corn

was not yet usual; and in its more northern districts agriculture

was not practised, and the rearing of cattle was the only known mode

of turning the soil to account. The culture of the olive and vine,

which yielded rich produce to the Massiliots, was not yet prosecuted

beyond the Cevennes in the time of Caesar.

Urban Life

The Gauls were from the first disposed to settle in groups;

there were open villages everywhere, and the Helvetic canton

alone numbered in 696 four hundred of these, besides a multitude

of single homesteads. But there were not wanting also walled towns,

whose walls of alternate layers surprised the Romans both by their

suitableness and by the elegant interweaving of timber and stones

in their construction; while, it is true, even in the towns

of the Allobroges the buildings were erected solely of wood.

Of such towns the Helvetii had twelve and the Suessiones an equal number;

whereas at all events in the more northern districts, such as among

the Nervii, while there were doubtless also towns, the population

during war sought protection in the morasses and forests rather

than behind their walls, and beyond the Thames the primitive

defence of the wooden barricade altogether took the place

of towns and was in war the only place of refuge for men and herds.

Intercourse

In close association with the comparatively considerable

development of urban life stands the activity of intercourse

by land and by water. Everywhere there were roads and bridges.

The river-navigation, which streams like the Rhone, Garonne, Loire,

and Seine, of themselves invited, was considerable and lucrative.

But far more remarkable was the maritime navigation of the Celts.

Not only were the Celts, to all appearance, the nation that first

regularly navigated the Atlantic ocean, but we find that the art

of building and of managing vessels had attained among them

a remarkable development. The navigation of the peoples

of the Mediterranean had, as may readily be conceived from the nature

of the waters traversed by them, for a comparatively long period

adhered to the oar; the war-vessels of the Phoenicians, Hellenes,

and Romans were at all times oared galleys, in which the sail

was applied only as an occasional aid to the oar; the trading vessels

alone were in the epoch of developed ancient civilization "sailers"

properly so called.(14) On the other hand the Gauls doubtless

employed in the Channel in Caesar's time, as for long afterwards,

a species of portable leathern skiffs, which seem to have been

in the main common oared boats, but on the west coast of Gaul

the Santones, the Pictones, and above all the Veneti sailed in large

though clumsily built ships, which were not impelled by oars

but were provided with leathern sails and iron anchor-chains;

and they employed these not only for their traffic with Britain,

but also in naval combat. Here therefore we not only meet

for the first time with navigation in the open ocean, but we find

that here the sailing vessel first fully took the place

of the oared boat--an improvement, it is true, which the declining

activity of the old world did not know how to turn to account,

and the immeasurable results of which our own epoch of renewed culture

is employed in gradually reaping.

Commerce

Manufactures

With this regular maritime intercourse between the British

and Gallic coasts, the very close political connection between

the inhabitants on both sides of the Channel is as easily explained

as the flourishing of transmarine commerce and of fisheries.

It was the Celts of Brittany in particular, that brought the tin

of the mines of Cornwall from England and carried it by the river

and land routes of Gaul to Narbo and Massilia. The statement,

that in Caesar's time certain tribes at the mouth of the Rhine subsisted

on fish and birds' eggs, may probably refer to the circumstance

that marine fishing and the collection of the eggs of sea-birds

were prosecuted there on an extensive scale. When we put together

and endeavour to fill up the isolated and scanty statements which have

reached us regarding the Celtic commerce and intercourse, we come

to see why the tolls of the river and maritime ports play a great

part in the budgets of certain cantons, such as those of the Haedui

and the Veneti, and why the chief god of the nation was regarded

by them as the protector of the roads and of commerce, and at

the same time as the inventor of manufactures. Accordingly the Celtic

industry cannot have been wholly undeveloped; indeed the singular

dexterity of the Celts, and their peculiar skill in imitating

any model and executing any instructions, are noticed by Caesar.

In most branches, however, their handicraft does not appear

to have risen above the ordinary level; the manufacture of linen

and woollen stuffs, that subsequently flourished in central

and northern Gaul, was demonstrably called into existence only

by the Romans. The elaboration of metals forms an exception,

and so far as we know the only one. The copper implements

not unfrequently of excellent workmanship and even now malleable,

which are brought to light in the tombs of Gaul, and the carefully

adjusted Arvernian gold coins, are still at the present day

striking witnesses of the skill of the Celtic workers in copper

and gold; and with this the reports of the ancients well accord,

that the Romans learned the art of tinning from the Bituriges

and that of silvering from the Alesini--inventions, the first of which

was naturally suggested by the traffic' in tin, and both of which

were probably made in the period of Celtic freedom.

Mining

Hand in hand with dexterity in the elaboration of the metals went

the art of procuring them, which had attained, more especially in

the iron mines on the Loire, such a degree of professional skill

that the miners played an important part in the sieges. The opinion

prevalent among the Romans of this period, that Gaul was one

of the richest gold countries in the world, is no doubt refuted

by the well-known nature of the soil and by the character

of the articles found in the Celtic tombs, in which gold appears

but sparingly and with far less frequency than in the similar

repositories of the true native regions of gold; this conception

no doubt had its origin merely from the descriptions which Greek

travellers and Roman soldiers, doubtless not without strong

exaggeration, gave to their countrymen of the magnificence

of the Arvernian kings,(15) and of the treasures of the Tolosan

temples.(16) But their stories were not pure fictions. It may

well be believed that in and near the rivers which flow

from the Alps and the Pyrenees gold-washing and searches for gold,

which are unprofitable at the present value of labour, were worked

with profit and on a considerable scale in ruder times and with a system

of slavery; besides, the commercial relations of Gaul may,

as is not unfrequently the case with half-civilized peoples,

have favoured the accumulation of a dead stock of the precious metals.

Art and Science

The low state of the arts of design is remarkable,

and is the more striking by the side of this mechanical skill

in handling the metals. The fondness for parti-coloured and brilliant

ornaments shows the want of a proper taste, which is sadly confirmed

by the Gallic coins with their representations sometimes exceedingly

simple, sometimes odd, but always childish in design, and almost

without exception rude beyond parallel in their execution.

It is perhaps unexampled that a coinage practised for centuries

with a certain technical skill should have essentially limited itself

to always imitating two or three Greek dies, and always

with increasing deformity. On the other hand the art of poetry

was highly valued by the Celts, and intimately blended

with the religious and even with the political institutions

of the nation; we find religious poetry, as well as that of the court

and of the mendicant, flourishing.(17) Natural science and philosophy

also found, although subject to the forms and fetters of the theology

of the country, a certain amount of attention among the Celts;

and Hellenic humanism met with a ready reception wherever

and in whatever shape it approached them. The knowledge of writing

was general at least among the priests. For the most part in free Gaul

the Greek writing was made use of in Caesar's time, as was done

among others by the Helvetii; but in its most southern districts

even then, in consequence of intercourse with the Romanized Celts,

the Latin attained predominance--we meet with it, for instance,

on the Arvernian coins of this period.

Political Organization

Cantonal Constitution

The political development of the Celtic nation also presents

very remarkable phenomena. The constitution of the state was based

in this case, as everywhere, on the clan-canton, with its prince,

its council of the elders, and its community of freemen capable

of bearing arms; but the peculiarity in this case was that it never

got beyond this cantonal constitution. Among the Greeks and Romans

the canton was very early superseded by the ring-wall as the basis

of political unity; where two cantons found themselves together

within the same walls, they amalgamated into one commonwealth;

where a body of burgesses assigned to a portion of their fellow-

burgesses a new ring-wall, there regularly arose in this way a new

state connected with the mother community only by ties of piety

and, at most, of clientship. Among the Celts on the other hand

the "burgess-body" continued at all times to be the clan; prince

and council presided over the canton and not over any town,

and the general diet of the canton formed the authority of last resort

in the state. The town had, as in the east, merely mercantile

and strategic, not political importance; for which reason the Gallic

townships, even when walled and very considerable such as Vienna

and Genava, were in the view of the Greeks and Romans nothing

but villages. In the time of Caesar the original clan-constitution

still subsisted substantially unaltered among the insular Celts

and in the northern cantons of the mainland; the general assembly held

the supreme authority; the prince was in essential questions bound

by its decrees; the common council was numerous--it numbered

in certain clans six hundred members--but does not appear

to have had more importance than the senate under the Roman kings.

In the more stirring southern portion of the land, again,

one or two generations before Caesar--the children of the last kings

were still living in his time--there had occurred, at least

among the larger clans, the Arverni, Haedui, Sequani, Helvetii,

a revolution which set aside the royal dominion and gave the power

into the hands of the nobility.

Development of Knighthood

Breaking Up of the Old Cantonal Constitution

It is simply the reverse side of the total want of urban

commonwealths among the Celts just noticed, that the opposite pole

of political development, knighthood, so thoroughly preponderates

in the Celtic clan-constitution. The Celtic aristocracy was to all

appearance a high nobility, for the most part perhaps the members

of the royal or formerly royal families; as indeed it is remarkable

that the heads of the opposite parties in the same clan

very frequently belong to the same house. These great families

combined in their hands financial, warlike, and political ascendency.

They monopolized the leases of the profitable rights of the state.

They compelled the free commons, who were oppressed by the burden

of taxation, to borrow from them, and to surrender their freedom

first de facto as debtors, then de jure as bondmen. They developed

the system of retainers, that is, the privilege of the nobility

to surround themselves with a number of hired mounted servants--

the -ambacti- as they were called (18)--and thereby to form a state

within the state; and, resting on the support of these troops

of their own, they defied the legal authorities and the common levy

and practically broke up the commonwealth. If in a clan,

which numbered about 80,000 men capable of arms, a single noble

could appear at the diet with 10,000 retainers, not reckoning

the bondmen and the debtors, it is clear that such an one

was more an independent dynast than a burgess of his clan. Moreover,

the leading families of the different clans were closely connected

and through intermarriages and special treaties formed virtually

a compact league, in presence of which the single clan was powerless.

Therefore the communities were no longer able to maintain

the public peace, and the law of the strong arm reigned throughout.

The dependent found protection only from his master, whom duty

and interest compelled to redress the injury inflicted on his client;

the state had no longer the power to protect those who were free,

and consequently these gave themselves over in numbers to some

powerful man as clients.

Abolition of the Monarchy

The common assembly lost its political importance; and even

the power of the prince, which should have checked the encroachments

of the nobility, succumbed to it among the Celts as well as in Latium.

In place of the king came the "judgment-worker" or -Vergobretus-,(19)

who was like the Roman consul nominated only for a year.

So far as the canton still held together at all, it was led

by the common council, in which naturally the heads of the aristocracy

usurped the government. Of course under such circumstances

there was agitation in the several clans much in the same way

as there had been agitation in Latium for centuries after the expulsion

of the kings: while the nobility of the different communities combined

to form a separate alliance hostile to the power of the community,

the multitude ceased not to desire the restoration of the monarchy;

and not unfrequently a prominent nobleman attempted, as Spurius

Cassius had done in Rome, with the support of the mass of those

belonging to the canton to break down the power of his peers,

and to reinstate the crown in its rights for his own special benefit.

Efforts towards National Unity

While the individual cantons were thus irremediably declining,

the sense of unity was at the same time powerfully stirring

in the nation and seeking in various ways to take shape and hold.

That combination of the whole Celtic nobility in contradistinction

to the individual canton-unions, while disturbing the existing order

of things, awakened and fostered the conception of the collective

unity of the nation. The attacks directed against the nation

from without, and the continued diminution of its territory in war

with its neighbours, operated in the same direction. Like the Hellenes

in their wars with the Persians, and the Italians in their wars

with the Celts, the Transalpine Gauls seem to have become conscious

of the existence and the power of their national unity in the wars

against Rome. Amidst the dissensions of rival clans and all their

feudal quarrelling there might still be heard the voices of those

who were ready to purchase the independence of the nation

at the cost of the independence of the several cantons, and even

at that of the seignorial rights of the knights. The thorough

popularity of the opposition to a foreign yoke was shown by the wars

of Caesar, with reference to whom the Celtic patriot party occupied

a position entirely similar to that of the German patriots

towards Napoleon; its extent and organization are attested,

among other things, by the telegraphic rapidity with which news

was communicated from one point to another.

Religious Union of the Nation

Druids

The universality and the strength of the Celtic national feeling

would be inexplicable but for the circumstance that, amidst

the greatest political disruption, the Celtic nation had for long

been centralized in respect of religion and even of theology.

The Celtic priesthood or, to use the native name, the corporation

of the Druids, certainly embraced the British islands and all Gaul,

and perhaps also other Celtic countries, in a common religious-

national bond. It possessed a special head elected by the priests

themselves; special schools, in which its very comprehensive

tradition was transmitted; special privileges, particularly

exemption from taxation and military service, which every clan

respected; annual councils, which were held near Chartres

at the "centre of the Celtic earth"; and above all, a believing people,

who in painful piety and blind obedience to their priests seem

to have been nowise inferior to the Irish of modern times. It may

readily be conceived that such a priesthood attempted to usurp,

as it partially did usurp, the secular government; where the annual

monarchy subsisted, it conducted the elections in the event

of an interregnum; it successfully laid claim to the right of excluding

individuals and whole communities from religious, and consequently

also from civil, society; it was careful to draw to itself the most

important civil causes, especially processes as to boundaries

and inheritance; on the ground, apparently, of its right to exclude

from the community, and perhaps also of the national custom

that criminals should be by preference taken for the usual

human sacrifices, it developed an extensive priestly criminal

jurisdiction, which was co-ordinate with that of the kings

and vergobrets; it even claimed the right of deciding on war and peace.

The Gauls were not far removed from an ecclesiastical state

with its pope and councils, its immunities, interdicts,

and spiritual courts; only this ecclesiastical state did not,

like that of recent times, stand aloof from the nations,

but was on the contrary pre-eminently national.

Want of Political Centralization

The Canton-Leagues

But while the sense of mutual relationship was thus vividly

awakened among the Celtic tribes, the nation was still precluded

from attaining a basis of political centralization such as Italy

found in the Roman burgesses, and the Hellenes and Germans

in the Macedonian and Frank kings. The Celtic priesthood and likewise

the nobility--although both in a certain sense represented and combined

the nation--were yet, on the one hand, incapable of uniting it

in consequence of their particular class-interests, and, on the other

hand, sufficiently powerful to allow no king and no canton to accomplish

the work of union. Attempts at this work were not wanting;

they followed, as the cantonal constitution suggested,

the system of hegemony. A powerful canton induced a weaker

to become subordinate, on such a footing that the leading canton

acted for the other as well as for itself in its external relations

and stipulated for it in state-treaties, while the dependent canton

bound itself to render military service and sometimes also to pay

a tribute. In this way a series of separate leagues arose;

but there was no leading canton for all Gaul--no tie, however

loose, combining the nation as a whole.

The Belgic League

The Maritime Cantons

The Leagues of Central Gaul

It has been already mentioned(20) that the Romans

at the commencement of their Transalpine conquests found in the north

a Britanno-Belgic league under the leadership of the Suessiones,

and in central and southern Gaul the confederation of the Arverni,

with which latter the Haedui, although having a weaker body

of clients, carried on a rivalry. In Caesar's time we find the Belgae

in north-eastern Gaul between the Seine and the Rhine still forming

such an association, which, however, apparently no longer extends

to Britain; by their side there appears, in the modern Normandy

and Brittany, the league of the Aremorican or the maritime cantons:

in central or proper Gaul two parties as formerly contended

for the hegemony, the one headed by the Haedui, the other by the Sequani

after the Arvernians weakened by the wars with Rome had retired.

These different confederacies subsisted independently side by side;

the leading states of central Gaul appear never to have extended

their clientship to the north-east nor, seriously, perhaps even

to the north-west of Gaul.

Character of Those Leagues

The impulse of the nation towards freedom found doubtless a certain

gratification in these cantonal unions; but they were in every

respect unsatisfactory. The union was of the loosest kind, constantly

fluctuating between alliance and hegemony; the representation

of the whole body in peace by the federal diets, in war

by the general,(21) was in the highest degree feeble. The Belgian

confederacy alone seems to have been bound together somewhat

more firmly; the national enthusiasm, from which the successful

repulse of the Cimbri proceeded,(22) may have proved beneficial

to it. The rivalries for the hegemony made a breach in every

league, which time did not close but widened, because the victory

of one competitor still left his opponent in possession

of political existence, and it always remained open to him,

even though he had submitted to clientship, subsequently to renew

the struggle. The rivalry among the more powerful cantons not only

set these at variance, but spread into every dependent clan,

into every village, often indeed into every house, for each individual

chose his side according to his personal relations. As Hellas

exhausted its strength not so much in the struggle of Athens against

Sparta as in the internal strife of the Athenian and Lacedaemonian

factions in every dependent community, and even in Athens itself,

so the rivalry of the Arverni and Haedui with its repetitions

on a smaller and smaller scale destroyed the Celtic people.

The Celtic Military System

Cavalry

The military capability of the nation felt the reflex influence

of these political and social relations. The cavalry was throughout

the predominant arm; alongside of which among the Belgae, and still

more in the British islands, the old national war-chariots appear

in remarkable perfection. These equally numerous and efficient

bands of combatants on horseback and in chariots were formed

from the nobility and its vassals; for the nobles had a genuine knightly

delight in dogs and horses, and were at much expense to procure

noble horses of foreign breed. It is characteristic of the spirit

and the mode of fighting of these nobles that, when the levy

was called out, whoever could keep his seat on horseback,

even the gray-haired old man, took the field, and that, when on the point

of beginning a combat with an enemy of whom they made little account,

they swore man by man that they would keep aloof from house

and homestead, unless their band should charge at least twice through

the enemy's line. Among the hired warriors the free-lance spirit

prevailed with all its demoralized and stolid indifference towards

their own life and that of others. This is apparent from the stories--

however anecdotic their colouring--of the Celtic custom of tilting

by way of sport and now and then fighting for life or death

at a banquet, and of the usage (which prevailed among the Celts,

and outdid even the Roman gladiatorial games) of selling themselves

to be killed for a set sum of money or a number of casks of wine,

and voluntarily accepting the fatal blow stretched on their shield

before the eyes of the whole multitude.

Infantry

By the side of these mounted warriors the infantry fell

into the background. In the main it essentially resembled the bands

of Celts, with whom the Romans had fought in Italy and Spain.

The large shield was, as then, the principal weapon of defence;

among the offensive arms, on the other hand, the long thrusting

lance now played the chief part in room of the sword. Where several

cantons waged war in league, they naturally encamped and fought clan

against clan; there is no trace of their giving to the levy of each

canton military organization and forming smaller and more regular

tactical subdivisions. A long train of waggons still dragged

the baggage of the Celtic army; instead of an entrenched camp, such as

the Romans pitched every night, the poor substitute of a barricade

of waggons still sufficed. In the case of certain cantons,

such as the Nervii, the efficiency of their infantry is noticed

as exceptional; it is remarkable that these had no cavalry,

and perhaps were not even a Celtic but an immigrant German tribe.

But in general the Celtic infantry of this period appears

as an unwarlike and unwieldy levy en masse; most of all

in the more southern provinces, where along with barbarism valour

had also disappeared. The Celt, says Caesar, ventures not to face

the German in battle. The Roman general passed a censure

still more severe than this judgment on the Celtic infantry,

seeing that, after having become acquainted with them

in his first campaign, he never again employed them

in connection with Roman infantry.

Stage of Development of the Celtic Civilization

If we survey the whole condition of the Celts as Caesar found it

in the Transalpine regions, there is an unmistakeable advance

in civilization, as compared with the stage of culture at which

the Celts came before us a century and a half previously in the valley

of the Po. Then the militia, excellent of its kind, thoroughly

preponderated in their armies;(23) now the cavalry occupies

the first place. Then the Celts dwelt in open villages; now well-

constructed walls surrounded their townships. The objects too

found in the tombs of Lombardy are, especially as respects articles

of copper and glass, far inferior to those of northern Gaul.

Perhaps the most trustworthy measure of the increase of culture

is the sense of a common relationship in the nation; so little

of it comes to light in the Celtic battles fought on the soil of what

is now Lombardy, while it strikingly appears in the struggles

against Caesar. To all appearance the Celtic nation, when Caesar

encountered it, had already reached the maximum of the culture

allotted to it, and was even now on the decline. The civilization

of the Transalpine Celts in Caesar's time presents, even for us

who are but very imperfectly informed regarding it, several aspects

that are estimable, and yet more that are interesting; in some

respects it is more akin to the modern than to the Hellenic-Roman

culture, with its sailing vessels, its knighthood, its ecclesiastical

constitution, above all with its attempts, however imperfect,

to build the state not on the city, but on the tribe and in a higher

degree on the nation. But just because we here meet the Celtic nation

at the culminating point of its development, its lesser degree

of moral endowment or, which is the same thing, its lesser

capacity of culture, comes more distinctly into view.

It was unable to produce from its own resources either a national

art or a national state; it attained at the utmost a national theology

and a peculiar type of nobility. The original simple valour

was no more; the military courage based on higher morality and judicious

organization, which comes in the train of increased civilization,

had only made its appearance in a very stunted form among

the knights. Barbarism in the strict sense was doubtless outlived;

the times had gone by, when in Gaul the fat haunch was assigned

to the bravest of the guests, but each of his fellow-guests who thought

himself offended thereby was at liberty to challenge the receiver

on that score to combat, and when the most faithful retainers

of a deceased chief were burnt along with him. But human sacrifices

still continued, and the maxim of law, that torture was inadmissible

in the case of the free man but allowable in that of the free

woman as well as of slaves, throws a far from pleasing light

on the position which the female sex held among the Celts

even in their period of culture. The Celts had lost the advantages

which specially belong to the primitive epoch of nations, but had not

acquired those which civilization brings with it when it intimately

and thoroughly pervades a people.

External Relations

Celts and Iberians

Such was the internal condition of the Celtic nation. It remains

that we set forth their external relations with their neighbours,

and describe the part which they sustained at this moment in the mighty

rival race and rival struggle of the nations, in which it is

everywhere still more difficult to maintain than to acquire.

Along the Pyrenees the relations of the peoples had for long been

peaceably settled, and the times had long gone by when the Celts

there pressed hard on, and to some extent supplanted, the Iberian,

that is, the Basque, original population. The valleys of the Pyrenees

as well as the mountains of Bearn and Gascony, and also the coast-

steppes to the south of the Garonne, were at the time of Caesar

in the undisputed possession of the Aquitani, a great number

of small tribes of Iberian descent, coming little into contact

with each other and still less with the outer world; in this quarter

only the mouth of the Garonne with the important port of Burdigala

(Bordeaux) was in the hands of a Celtic tribe, the Bituriges-Vivisci.

Celts and Romans

Advance of Roman Trade and Commerce into Free Gaul

Of far greater importance was the contact of the Celtic nation

with the Roman people, and with the Germans. We need not here repeat--

what has been related already--how the Romans in their slow advance

had gradually pressed back the Celts, had at last occupied the belt

of coast between the Alps and the Pyrenees, and had thereby totally

cut them off from Italy, Spain and the Mediterranean Sea--a catastrophe,

for which the way had already been prepared centuries before

by the laying out of the Hellenic stronghold at the mouth

of the Rhone. But we must here recall the fact that it was not merely

the superiority of the Roman arms which pressed hard on the Celts,

but quite as much that of Roman culture, which likewise reaped

the ultimate benefit of the respectable beginnings of Hellenic

civilization in Gaul. Here too, as so often happens, trade

and commerce paved the way for conquest. The Celt after northern

fashion was fond of fiery drinks; the fact that like the Scythian

he drank the generous wine unmingled and to intoxication,

excited the surprise and the disgust of the temperate southern;

but the trader has no objection to deal with such customers.

Soon the trade with Gaul became a mine of gold for the Italian merchant;

it was nothing unusual there for a jar of wine to be exchanged

for a slave. Other articles of luxury, such as Italian horses,

found advantageous sale in Gaul. There were instances even already

of Roman burgesses acquiring landed property beyond the Roman

frontier, and turning it to profit after the Italian fashion;

there is mention, for example, of Roman estates in the canton

of the Segusiavi (near Lyons) as early as about 673. Beyond doubt it

was a consequence of this that, as already mentioned(24) in free Gaul

itself, e. g. among the Arverni, the Roman language was not unknown

even before the conquest; although this knowledge was presumably

still restricted to few, and even the men of rank in the allied

canton of the Haedui had to be conversed with through interpreters.

Just as the traffickers in fire-water and the squatters led the way

in the occupation of North America, so these Roman wine-traders

and landlords paved the way for, and beckoned onward, the future

conqueror of Gaul. How vividly this was felt even on the opposite

side, is shown by the prohibition which one of the most energetic

tribes of Gaul, the canton of the Nervii, like some German peoples,

issued against trafficking with the Romans.

Celts and Germans

Still more violent even than the pressure of the Romans

from the Mediterranean was that of the Germans downward from the Baltic

and the North Sea--a fresh stock from the great cradle of peoples

in the east, which made room for itself by the side of its elder

brethren with youthful vigour, although also with youthful

rudeness. Though the tribes of this stock dwelling nearest

to the Rhine--the Usipetes, Tencteri, Sugambri, Ubii--had begun to be

in some degree civilized, and had at least ceased voluntarily

to change their abodes, all accounts yet agree that farther inland

agriculture was of little importance, and the several tribes

had hardly yet attained fixed abodes. It is significant

in this respect that their western neighbours at this time hardly knew

how to name any one of the peoples of the interior of Germany

by its cantonal name; these were only known to them under the general

appellations of the Suebi, that is, the roving people or nomads,

and the Marcomani, that is, the land-guard(25)--names which were

hardly cantonal names in Caesar's time, although they appeared

as such to the Romans and subsequently became in various cases

names of cantons.

The Right Bank of the Rhine Lost to the Celts

The most violent onset of this great nation fell upon the Celts.

The struggles, in which the Germans probably engaged with the Celts

for the possession of the regions to the east of the Rhine, are

wholly withdrawn from our view. We are only able to perceive,

that about the end of the seventh century of Rome all the land

as far as the Rhine was already lost to the Celts; that the Boii,

who were probably once settled in Bavaria and Bohemia,(26) were homeless

wanderers; and that even the Black Forest formerly possessed

by the Helvetii,(27) if not yet taken possession of by the German tribes

dwelling in the vicinity, was at least waste debateable border-

land, and was presumably even then, what it was afterwards called,

the Helvetian desert The barbarous strategy of the Germans--which

secured them from hostile attacks by laying waste the neighbourhood

for miles--seems to have been applied here on the greatest scale.

German Tribes on the Left Bank of the Rhine

But the Germans had not remained stationary at the Rhine.

The march of the Cimbrian and Teutonic host, composed, as respects

its flower, of German tribes, which had swept with such force fifty

years before over Pannonia, Gaul, Italy, and Spain, seemed to have

been nothing but a grand reconnaissance. Already different German

tribes had formed permanent settlements to the west of the Rhine,

especially of its lower course; having intruded as conquerors,

these settlers continued to demand hostages and to levy annual

tribute from the Gallic inhabitants in their neighbourhood,

as if from subjects. Among these German tribes were the Aduatuci,

who from a fragment of the Cimbrian horde(28) had grown

into a considerable canton, and a number of other tribes afterwards

comprehended under the name of the Tungri on the Maas in the region

of Liege; even the Treveri (about Treves) and the Nervii

(in Hainault), two of the largest and most powerful peoples

of this region, are directly designated by respectable authorities

as Germans. The complete credibility of these accounts must certainly

remain doubtful, since, as Tacitus remarks in reference to the two

peoples last mentioned, it was subsequently, at least in these regions,

reckoned an honour to be descended of German blood and not to belong

to the little-esteemed Celtic nation; yet the population

in the region of the Scheldt, Maas, and Moselle seems certainly

to have become, in one way or another, largely mingled with German

elements, or at any rate to have come under German influences.

The German settlements themselves were perhaps small;

they were not unimportant, for amidst the chaotic obscurity,

through which we see the stream of peoples on the right bank

of the Rhine ebbing and flowing about this period, we can well perceive

that larger German hordes were preparing to cross the Rhine in the track

of these advanced posts. Threatened on two sides by foreign domination

and torn by internal dissension, it was scarcely to be expected

that the unhappy Celtic nation would now rally and save itself

by its own vigour. Dismemberment, and decay in virtue of dismemberment,

had hitherto been its history; how should a nation, which could

name no day like those of Marathon and Salamis, of Aricia and the Raudine

plain--a nation which, even in its time of vigour, had made

no attempt to destroy Massilia by a united effort--now when evening

had come, defend itself against so formidable foes?

The Roman Policy with Reference to the German Invasion

The less the Celts, left to themselves, were a match for the Germans,

the more reason had the Romans carefully to watch over the complications

in which the two nations might be involved. Although the movements

thence arising had not up to the present time directly affected

them, they and their most important interests were yet concerned

in the issue of those movements. As may readily be conceived,

the internal demeanour of the Celtic nation had become speedily

and permanently influenced by its outward relations. As in Greece

the Lacedaemonian party combined with Persia against the Athenians,

so the Romans from their first appearance beyond the Alps had found

a support against the Arverni, who were then the ruling power among

the southern Celts, in their rivals for the hegemony, the Haedui:

and with the aid of these new "brothers of the Roman nation" they had

not merely reduced to subjection the Allobroges and a great portion

of the indirect territory of the Arverni, but had also, in the Gaul

that remained free, occasioned by their influence the transference

of the hegemony from the Arverni to these Haedui. But while the Greeks

were threatened with danger to their nationality only from one side,

the Celts found themselves hard pressed simultaneously by two

national foes; and it was natural that they should seek from the one

protection against the other, and that, if the one Celtic party

attached itself to the Romans, their opponents should

on the contrary form alliance with the Germans. This course

was most natural for the Belgae, who were brought by neighbourhood

and manifold intermixture into closer relation to the Germans who had

crossed the Rhine, and moreover, with their less-developed culture,

probably felt themselves at least as much akin to the Suebian

of alien race as to their cultivated Allobrogian or Helvetic

countryman. But the southern Celts also, among whom now

as already mentioned, the considerable canton of the Sequani

(about Besangon) stood at the head of the party hostile to the Romans,

had every reason at this very time to call in the Germans against

the Romans who immediately threatened them; the remiss government

of the senate and the signs of the revolution preparing in Rome,

which had not remained unknown to the Celts, made this very moment

seem suitable for ridding themselves of the Roman influence

and primarily for humbling the Roman clients, the Haedui. A rupture

had taken place between the two cantons respecting the tolls

on the Saone, which separated the territory of the Haedui

from that of the Sequani, and about the year 683 the German prince

Ariovistus with some 15,000 armed men had crossed the Rhine

as condottiere of the Sequani.

Ariovistus on the Middle Rhine

The war was prolonged for some years with varying success;

on the whole the results were unfavourable to the Haedui. Their leader

Eporedorix at length called out their whole clients, and marched

forth with an enormous superiority of force against the Germans.

These obstinately refused battle, and kept themselves under cover

of morasses and forests. It was not till the clans, weary

of waiting, began to break up and disperse, that the Germans appeared

in the open field, and then Ariovistus compelled a battle

at Admagetobriga, in which the flower of the cavalry of the Haedui

were left on the field. The Haedui, forced by this defeat

to conclude peace on the terms which the victor proposed, were obliged

to renounce the hegemony, and to consent with their whole adherents

to become clients of the Sequani; they had to bind themselves

to pay tribute to the Sequani or rather to Ariovistus, and to furnish

the children of their principal nobles as hostages; and lastly

they had to swear that they would never demand back these hostages

nor invoke the intervention of the Romans.

Inaction of the Romans

This peace was concluded apparently about 693.(29) Honour

and advantage enjoined the Romans to come forward in opposition to it;

the noble Haeduan Divitiacus, the head of the Roman party in his clan,

and for that reason now banished by his countrymen, went in person

to Rome to solicit their intervention. A still more serious

warning was the insurrection of the Allobroges in 693(30)--

the neighbours of the Sequani--which was beyond doubt connected

with these events. In reality orders were issued to the Gallic

governors to assist the Haedui; they talked of sending consuls

and consular armies over the Alps; but the senate, to whose decision

these affairs primarily fell, at length here also crowned great

words with little deeds. The insurrection of the Allobroges

was suppressed by arms, but nothing was done for the Haedui;

on the contrary, Ariovistus was even enrolled in 695 in the list

of kings friendly with the Romans.(31)

Foundation of a German Empire in Gaul

The German warrior-prince naturally took this as a renunciation

by the Romans of the Celtic land which they had not occupied;

he accordingly took up his abode there, and began to establish

a German principality on Gallic soil. It was his intention that

the numerous bands which he had brought with him, and the still

more numerous bands that afterwards followed at his call from home--

it was reckoned that up to 696 some 120,000 Germans had crossed

the Rhine--this whole mighty immigration of the German nation,

which poured through the once opened sluices like a stream over

the beautiful west, should become settled there and form a basis

on which he might build his dominion over Gaul. The extent

of the German settlements which he called into existence

on the left bank of the Rhine cannot be determined; beyond doubt

it was great, and his projects were far greater still. The Celts

were treated by him as a wholly subjugated nation, and no distinction

was made between the several cantons. Even the Sequani, as whose hired

commander-in-chief he had crossed the Rhine, were obliged, as if they

were vanquished enemies, to cede to him for his people a third

of their territory--presumably upper Alsace afterwards inhabited

by the Triboci--where Ariovistus permanently settled with his followers;

nay, as if this were not enough, a second third was afterwards

demanded of them for the Harudes who arrived subsequently.

Ariovistus seemed as if he wished to take up in Gaul the part

of Philip of Macedonia, and to play the master over the Celts

who were friendly to the Germans no less than over those

who adhered to the Romans.

The Germans on the Lower Rhine

The Germans on the Upper Rhine

Spread of the Helvetian Invasion to the Interior of Gaul

The appearance of the energetic German prince in so dangerous

proximity, which could not but in itself excite the most serious

apprehension in the Romans, appeared still more threatening,

inasmuch as it stood by no means alone. The Usipetes and Tencteri

settled on the right bank of the Rhine, weary of the incessant

devastation of their territory by the overbearing Suebian tribes,

had, the year before Caesar arrived in Gaul (695), set out

from their previous abodes to seek others at the mouth of the Rhine.

They had already taken away from the Menapii there the portion

of their territory situated on the right bank, and it might be

foreseen that they would make the attempt to establish themselves

also on the left. Suebian bands, moreover, assembled between

Cologne and Mayence, and threatened to appear as uninvited guests

in the opposite Celtic canton of the Treveri. Lastly,

the territory of the most easterly clan of the Celts, the warlike

and numerous Helvetii, was visited with growing frequency

by the Germans, so that the Helvetii, who perhaps even apart from this

were suffering from over-population through the reflux of their

settlers from the territory which they had lost to the north

of the Rhine, and besides were liable to be completely isolated

from their kinsmen by the settlement of Ariovistus in the territory

of the Sequani, conceived the desperate resolution of voluntarily

evacuating the territory hitherto in their possession to the Germans,

and acquiring larger and more fertile abodes to the west

of the Jura, along with, if possible, the hegemony in the interior

of Gaul--a plan which some of their districts had already formed

and attempted to execute during the Cimbrian invasion.(32)

the Rauraci whose territory (Basle and southern Alsace) was similarly

threatened, the remains, moreover, of the Boii who had already

at an earlier period been compelled by the Germans to forsake their

homes and were now unsettled wanderers, and other smaller tribes,

made common cause with the Helvetii. As early as 693 their flying

parties came over the Jura and even as far as the Roman province;

their departure itself could not be much longer delayed; inevitably

German settlers would then advance into the important region

between the lakes of Constance and Geneva forsaken by its defenders.

From the sources of the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean the German tribes

were in motion; the whole line of the Rhine was threatened by them;

it was a moment like that when the Alamanni and the Franks

threw themselves on the falling empire of the Caesars;

and even now there seemed on the eve of being carried into effect

against the Celts that very movement which was successful

five hundred years afterwards against the Romans.

Caesar Proceeds to Gaul

Caesar's Army

Under these circumstances the new governor Gaius Caesar arrived

in the spring of 696 in Narbonese Gaul, which had been added by decree

of the senate to his original province embracing Cisalpine Gaul

along with Istria and Dalmatia. His office, which was committed

to him first for five years (to the end of 700), then in 699

for five more (to the end of 705), gave him the right to nominate

ten lieutenants of propraetorian rank, and (at least according to

his own interpretation) to fill up his legions, or even to form

new ones at his discretion out of the burgess-population--who were

especially numerous in Cisalpine Gaul--of the territory under his

sway. The army, which he received in the two provinces, consisted,

as regards infantry of the line, of four legions trained and inured

to war, the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth, or at the utmost

24,000 men, to which fell to be added, as usual, the contingents

of the subjects. The cavalry and light-armed troops, moreover,

were represented by horsemen from Spain, and by Numidian, Cretan,

and Balearic archers and slingers. The staff of Caesar--the elite

of the democracy of the capital--contained, along with not a few

useless young men of rank, some able officers, such as Publius

Crassus the younger son of the old political ally of Caesar,

and Titus Labienus, who followed the chief of the democracy

as a faithful adjutant from the Forum to the battle-field.

Caesar had not received definite instructions; to one

who was discerning and courageous these were implied

in the circumstances with which he had to deal. Here too

the negligence of the senate had to be retrieved, and first of all

the stream of migration of the German peoples had to be checked.

Repulse of the Helvetii

Just at this time the Helvetic invasion, which was closely

interwoven with the German and had been in preparation for years,

began. That they might not make a grant of their abandoned huts

to the Germans and might render their own return impossible,

the Helvetii had burnt their towns and villages; and their long

trains of waggons, laden with women, children, and the best part

of their moveables, arrived from all sides at the Leman lake near

Genava (Geneva), where they and their comrades had fixed their

rendezvous for the 28th of March(33) of this year. According

to their own reckoning the whole body consisted of 368,000 persons,

of whom about a fourth part were able to bear arms. As the mountain

chain of the Jura, stretching from the Rhine to the Rhone, almost

completely closed in the Helvetic country towards the west,

and its narrow defiles were as ill adapted for the passage

of such a caravan as they were well adapted for defence, the leaders

had resolved to go round in a southerly direction, and to open up

for themselves a way to the west at the point, where the Rhone

has broken through the mountain-chain between the south-western

and highest part of the Jura and the Savoy mountains, near

the modern Fort de l'Ecluse. But on the right bank here the rocks

and precipices come so close to the river that there remained only

a narrow path which could easily be blocked up, and the Sequani,

to whom this bank belonged, could with ease intercept the route

of the Helvetii. They preferred therefore to pass over, above the point

where the Rhone breaks through, to the left Allobrogian bank,

with the view of regaining the right bank further down the stream

where the Rhone enters the plain, and then marching on towards

the level west of Gaul; there the fertile canton of the Santones

(Saintonge, the valley of the Charente) on the Atlantic Ocean

was selected by the wanderers for their new abode. This march led,

where it touched the left bank of the Rhone, through Roman territory;

and Caesar, otherwise not disposed to acquiesce in the establishment

of the Helvetii in western Gaul, was firmly resolved not to permit

their passage. But of his four legions three were stationed far

off at Aquileia; although he called out in haste the militia

of the Transalpine province, it seemed scarcely possible with so small

a force to hinder the innumerable Celtic host from crossing

the Rhone, between its exit from the Leman lake at Geneva

and the point of its breaking through the mountains, over a distance

of more than fourteen miles. Caesar, however, by negotiations

with the Helvetii, who would gladly have effected by peaceable means

the crossing of the river and the march through the Allobrogian

territory, gained a respite of fifteen days, which was employed

in breaking down the bridge over the Rhone at Genava, and barring

the southern bank of the Rhone against the enemy by an entrenchment

nearly nineteen miles long: it was the first application

of the system--afterwards carried out on so immense a scale

by the Romans--of guarding the frontier of the empire in a military point

of view by a chain of forts placed in connection with each other

by ramparts and ditches. The attempts of the Helvetii to gain

the other bank at different places in boats or by means of fords

were successfully frustrated by the Romans in these lines,

and the Helvetii were compelled to desist from the passage of the Rhone.

The Helvetii Move towards Gaul

On the other hand, the party in Gaul hostile to the Romans,

which hoped to obtain a powerful reinforcement in the Helvetii,

more especially the Haeduan Dumnorix brother of Divitiacus,

and at the head of the national party in his canton as the latter

wasat the head of the Romans, procured for them a passage

through the passes of the Jura and the territory of the Sequani.

The Romans had no legal title to forbid this; but other and higher

interestswereat stake for them in the Helvetic expedition than

the question of the formal integrity of the Roman territory-- interests

which could only be guarded, if Caesar, instead of confining himself,

as all the governors of the senate and even Marius(34) had done,

to the modest task of watching the frontier, should cross what had hitherto

been the frontier at the head of a considerable army. Caesar was general

not of the senate, but of the state; he showed no hesitation.

He had immediately proceeded from Genava in person to Italy,

and with characteristic speed brought up the three legions

cantoned there as well as two newly-formed legions of recruits.

The Helvetian War

These troops he united with the corps stationed at Genava,

and crossed the Rhone with his whole force. His unexpected appearance

in the territory of the Haedui naturally at once restored the Roman

party there to power, which was not unimportant as regarded

supplies. He found the Helvetii employed in crossing the Saone,

and moving from the territory of the Sequani into that

of the Haedui; those of them that were still on the left bank

of the Saone, especially the corps of the Tigorini, were caught

and destroyed by the Romans rapidly advancing. The bulk

of the expedition, however, had already crossed to the right bank

of the river; Caesar followed them and in twenty-four hours effected

the passage, which the unwieldy host of the Helvetii had not been able

to accomplish in twenty days. The Helvetii, prevented by this passage

of the river on the part of the Roman army from continuing

their march westward, turned in a northerly direction, doubtless

under the supposition that Caesar would not venture to follow them

far into the interior of Gaul, and with the intention, if he should

desist from following them, of turning again toward their proper

destination. For fifteen days the Roman army marched behind

that of the enemy at a distance of about four miles, clinging

to its rear, and hoping for an advantageous opportunity of assailing

the Helvetic host under conditions favourable to victory,

and destroying it. But this moment came not: unwieldy as was the march

of the Helvetic caravan, the leaders knew how to guard against

a surprise, and appeared to be copiously provided with supplies

as well as most accurately informed by their spies of every event

in the Roman camp. On the other hand the Romans began to suffer

from want of necessaries, especially when the Helvetii removed

from the Saone and the means of river-transport ceased. The non-arrival

of the supplies promised by the Haedui, from which this embarrassment

primarily arose, excited the more suspicion, as both armies

were still moving about in their territory. Moreover the considerable

Roman cavalry, numbering almost 4000 horse, proved utterly

untrustworthy--which doubtless admitted of explanation,

for they consisted almost wholly of Celtic horsemen, especially

of the mounted retainers of the Haedui, under the command of Dumnorix

the well-known enemy of the Romans, and Caesar himself had taken

them over still more as hostages than as soldiers. There was good

reason to believe that a defeat which they suffered at the hands

of the far weaker Helvetic cavalry was occasioned by themselves,

and that the enemy was informed by them of all occurrences

in the Roman camp. The position of Caesar grew critical; it was

becoming disagreeably evident, how much the Celtic patriot party

could effect even with the Haedui in spite of their official

alliance with Rome, and of the distinctive interests of this canton

inclining it towards the Romans; what was to be the issue, if they

ventured deeper and deeper into a country full of excitement,

and if they removed daily farther from their means of communication?

The armies were just marching past Bibracte (Autun), the capital

of the Haedui, at a moderate distance; Caesar resolved to seize

this important place by force before he continued his march

into the interior; and it is very possible, that he intended to desist

altogether from farther pursuit and to establish himself

in Bibracte. But when he ceased from the pursuit and turned

against Bibracte, the Helvetii thought that the Romans were making

preparations for flight, and now attacked in their turn.

Battle at Bibracte

Caesar desired nothing better. The two armies posted themselves

on two parallel chains of hills; the Celts began the engagement,

broke up the Roman cavalry which had advanced into the plain,

and rushed on against the Roman legions posted on the slope of the hill,

but were there obliged to give way before Caesar's veterans.

When the Romans thereupon, following up their advantage, descended

in their turn to the plain, the Celts again advanced against them,

and a reserved Celtic corps took them at the same time in flank.

The reserve of the Roman attacking column was pushed forward

against the latter; it forced it away from the main body towards

the baggage and the barricade of waggons, where it was destroyed.

The bulk of the Helvetic host was at length brought to give way,

and compelled to beat a retreat in an easterly direction--the opposite

of that towards which their expedition led them. This day had

frustrated the scheme of the Helvetii to establish for themselves

new settlements on the Atlantic Ocean, and handed them over

to the pleasure of the victor; but it had been a hot day also

for the conquerors. Caesar, who had reason for not altogether trusting

his staff of officers, had at the very outset sent away

all the officers' horses, so as to make the necessity of holding

their ground thoroughly clear to his troops; in fact the battle,

had the Romans lost it, would have probably brought about

the annihilation of the Roman army. The Roman troops

were too much exhausted to pursue the conquered with vigour;

but in consequence of the proclamation of Caesar that he would

treat all who should support the Helvetii as like the Helvetii

themselves enemies of the Romans, all support was refused

to the beaten army whithersoever it went-- in the first instance,

in the canton of the Lingones (about Langres)--and, deprived

of all supplies and of their baggage and burdened by the mass

of camp-followers incapable of fighting, they were under the necessity

of submitting to the Roman general.

The Helvetii Sent back to Their Original Abode

The lot of the vanquished was a comparatively mild one.

The Haedui were directed to concede settlements in their territory

to the homeless Boii; and this settlement of the conquered foe

in the midst of the most powerful Celtic cantons rendered almost

the services of a Roman colony. The survivors of the Helvetii

and Rauraci, something more than a third of the men that had marched

forth, were naturally sent back to their former territory.

It was incorporated with the Roman province, but the inhabitants

were admitted to alliance with Rome under favourable conditions,

in order to defend, under Roman supremacy, the frontier along

the upper Rhine against the Germans. Only the south-western point

of the Helvetic canton was directly taken into the possession

of the Romans, and there subsequently, on the charming shore

of the Leman lake, the old Celtic town Noviodunum (now Nyon)

was converted into a Roman frontier-fortress,

the "Julian equestrian colony."(35)

Caesar and Ariovistus

Negotiations

Thus the threatening invasion of the Germans on the upper Rhine

was obviated, and, at the same time, the party hostile to the Romans

among the Celts was humbled. On the middle Rhine also,

where the Germans had already crossed years ago, and where the power

of Ariovistus which vied with that of Rome in Gaul was daily

spreading, there was need of similar action, and the occasion

for a rupture was easily found. In comparison with the yoke threatened

or already imposed on them by Ariovistus, the Roman supremacy probably

now appeared to the greater part of the Celts in this quarter

the lesser evil; the minority, who retained their hatred

of the Romans, had at least to keep silence. A diet of the Celtic

tribes of central Gaul, held under Roman influence, requested

the Roman general in name of the Celtic nation for aid against

the Germans. Caesar consented. At his suggestion the Haedui stopped

the payment of the tribute stipulated to be paid to Ariovistus,

and demanded back the hostages furnished; and when Ariovistus

on account of this breach of treaty attacked the clients of Rome,

Caesar took occasion thereby to enter into direct negotiation

with him and specially to demand, in addition to the return

of the hostages and a promise to keep peace with the Haedui,

that Ariovistus should bind himself to allure no more Germans

over the Rhine. The German general replied to the Roman, in the full

consciousness of equality of rights, that northern Gaul had become

subject to him by right of war as fairly as southern Gaul

to the Romans; and that, as he did not hinder the Romans from taking

tribute from the Allobroges, so they should not prevent him

from taxing his subjects. In later secret overtures it appeared

that the prince was well aware of the circumstances of the Romans;

he mentioned the invitations which had been addressed to him from Rome

to put Caesar out of the way, and offered, if Caesar would leave

to him northern Gaul, to assist him in turn to obtain the sovereignty

of Italy--as the party-quarrels of the Celtic nation had opened up

an entrance for him into Gaul, he seemed to expect from the party-

quarrels of the Italian nation the consolidation of his rule there.

For centuries no such language of power completely on a footing

of equality and bluntly and carelessly expressing its independence had

been held in presence of the Romans, as was now heard from the king

of the German host; he summarily refused to come, when the Roman

general suggested that he should appear personally before him

according to the usual practice with client-princes.

Ariovistus Attacked

And Beaten

It was the more necessary not to delay; Caesar immediately set out

against Ariovistus. A panic seized his troops, especially his officers

when they were to measure their strength with the flower

of the German troops that for fourteen years had not come

under shelter of a roof: it seemed as if the deep decay of Roman moral

and military discipline would assert itself and provoke desertion

and mutiny even in Caesar's camp. But the general, while declaring

that in case of need he would march with the tenth legion alone

against the enemy, knew not merely how to influence these

by such an appeal to honour, but also how to bind the other regiments

to their eagles by warlike emulation, and to inspire the troops

with something of his own energy. Without leaving them time

for reflection, he led them onward in rapid marches, and fortunately

anticipated Ariovistus in the occupation of Vesontio (Besancon),

the capital of the Sequani. A personal conference between the two

generals, which took place at the request of Ariovistus, seemed

as if solely meant to cover an attempt against the person of Caesar;

arms alone could decide between the two oppressors of Gaul. The war

came temporarily to a stand. In lower Alsace somewhere in the region

of Muhlhausen, five miles from the Rhine,(36) the two armies

lay at a little distance from each other, till Ariovistus

with his very superior force succeeded in marching past the Roman camp,

placing himself in its rear, and cutting off the Romans

from their base and their supplies. Caesar attempted to free himself

from his painful situation by a battle; but Ariovistus did not accept it.

Nothing remained for the Roman general but, in spite of

his inferior strength, to imitate the movement of the Germans,

and to recover his communications by making two legions march past

the enemy and take up a position beyond the camp of the Germans,

while four legions remained behind in the former camp. Ariovistus,

when he saw the Romans divided, attempted an assault on their lesser

camp; but the Romans repulsed it. Under the impression made

by this success, the whole Roman army was brought forward

to the attack; and the Germans also placed themselves in battle array,

in a long line, each tribe for itself, the cars of the army

with the baggage and women being placed behind them to render flight

more difficult. The right wing of the Romans, led by Caesar himself,

threw itself rapidly on the enemy, and drove them before it;

the right wing of the Germans was in like manner successful.

The balance still stood equal; but the tactics of the reserve,

which had decided so many other conflicts with barbarians, decided

the conflict with the Germans also in favour of the Romans;

their third line, which Publius Crassus seasonably sent to render help,

restored the battle on the left wing and thereby decided

the victory. The pursuit was continued to the Rhine; only a few,

including the king, succeeded in escaping to the other bank (696).

German Settlements on the Left Bank of the Rhine

Thus brilliantly the Roman rule announced its advent to the mighty

stream, which the Italian soldiers here saw for the first time;

by a single fortunate battle the line of the Rhine was won.

The fate of the German settlements on the left bank of the Rhine

lay in the hands of Caesar; the victor could destroy them,

but he did not do so. The neighbouring Celtic cantons--the Sequani,

Leuci, Mediomatrici--were neither capable of self-defence

nor trustworthy; the transplanted Germans promised to become

not merely brave guardians of the frontier but also better subjects

of Rome, for their nationality severed them from the Celts,

and their own interest in the preservation of their newly-won

settlements severed them from their countrymen across the Rhine,

so that in their isolated position they could not avoid adhering

to the central power. Caesar here, as everywhere, preferred

conquered foes to doubtful friends; he left the Germans settled

by Ariovistus along the left bank of the Rhine--the Triboci

about Strassburg, the Nemetes about Spires, the Vangiones

about Worms--in possession of their new abodes, and entrusted them

with the guarding of the Rhine-frontier against their countrymen.(37)

The Suebi, who threatened the territory of the Treveri on the middle

Rhine, on receiving news of the defeat of Ariovistus, again retreated

into the interior of Germany; on which occasion they sustained

considerable loss by the way at the hands of the adjoining tribes.

The Rhine Boundary

The consequences of this one campaign were immense; they were felt

for many centuries after. The Rhine had become the boundary

of the Roman empire against the Germans. In Gaul, which was no longer

able to govern itself, the Romans had hitherto ruled on the south

coast, while lately the Germans had attempted to establish themselves

farther up. The recent events had decided that Gaul was to succumb

not merely in part but wholly to the Roman supremacy,

and that the natural boundary presented by the mighty river was also

to become the political boundary. The senate in its better times

had not rested, till the dominion of Rome had reached the natural

bounds of Italy--the Alps and the Mediterranean--and its adjacent

islands. The enlarged empire also needed a similar military

rounding off; but the present government left the matter

to accident, and sought at most to see, not that the frontiers

were capable of defence, but that they should not need to be defended

directly by itself. People felt that now another spirit

and another arm began to guide the destinies of Rome.

Subjugation of Gaul

Belgic Expedition

The foundations of the future edifice were laid; but in order

to finish the building and completely to secure the recognition

of the Roman rule by the Gauls, and that of the Rhine-frontier by

the Germans, very much still remained to be done. All central Gaul

indeed from the Roman frontier as far up as Chartres and Treves

submitted without objection to the new ruler; and on the upper

and middle Rhine also no attack was for the present to be apprehended

from the Germans. But the northern provinces--as well

the Aremorican cantons in Brittany and Normandy as the more powerful

confederation of the Belgae--were not affected by the blows

directed against central Gaul, and found no occasion to submit

to the conqueror of Ariovistus. Moreover, as was already remarked,

very close relations subsisted between the Belgae and the Germans

over the Rhine, and at the mouth of the Rhine also Germanic tribes

made themselves ready to cross the stream. In consequence of this

Caesar set out with his army, now increased to eight legions,

in the spring of 697 against the Belgic cantons. Mindful of the brave

and successful resistance which fifty years before they had

with united strength presented to the Cimbri on the borders of their

land,(38) and stimulated by the patriots who had fled to them

in numbers from central Gaul, the confederacy of the Belgae sent

their whole first levy--300,000 armed men under the leadership of Galba

the king of the Suessiones--to their southern frontier to receive

Caesar there. A single canton alone, that of the powerful Remi

(about Rheims) discerned in this invasion of the foreigners

an opportunity to shake off the rule which their neighbours

the Suessiones exercised over them, and prepared to take up

in the north the part which the Haedui had played in central Gaul.

The Roman and the Belgic armies arrived in their territory almost

at the same time.

Conflicts on the Aisne

Submission of the Western Cantons

Caesar did not venture to give battle to the brave enemy six times

as strong; to the north of the Aisne, not far from the modern

Pontavert between Rheims and Laon, he pitched his camp on a plateau

rendered almost unassailable on all sides partly by the river

and by morasses, partly by fosses and redoubts, and contented himself

with thwarting by defensive measures the attempts of the Belgae

to cross the Aisne and thereby to cut him off from his communications.

When he counted on the likelihood that the coalition would speedily

collapse under its own weight, he had reckoned rightly. King Galba

was an honest man, held in universal respect; but he was not equal

to the management of an army of 300,000 men on hostile soil.

No progress was made, and provisions began to fail; discontent

and dissension began to insinuate themselves into the camp

of the confederates. The Bellovaci in particular, equal to

the Suessiones in power, and already dissatisfied that the supreme

command of the confederate army had not fallen to them, could no longer

be detained after news had arrived that the Haedui as allies

of the Romans were making preparations to enter the Bellovacic territory.

They determined to break up and go home; though for honour's sake

all the cantons at the same time bound themselves to hasten

with their united strength to the help of the one first attacked,

the miserable dispersion of the confederacy was but miserably palliated

by such impracticable stipulations. It was a catastrophe

which vividly reminds us of that which occurred almost

on the same spot in 1792; and, just as with the campaign in Champagne,

the defeat was all the more severe that it took place without a battle.

The bad leadership of the retreating army allowed the Roman general

to pursue it as if it were beaten, and to destroy a portion

of the contingents that had remained to the last. But the consequences

of the victory were not confined to this. As Caesar advanced

into the western cantons of the Belgae, one after another

gave themselves up as lost almost without resistance; the powerful

Suessiones (about Soissons), as well as their rivals, the Bellovaci

(about Beauvais) and the Ambiani (about Amiens). The towns opened

their gates when they saw the strange besieging machines,

the towers rolling up to their walls; those who would not submit

to the foreign masters sought a refuge beyond the sea in Britain.

The Conflict with the Nervii

But in the eastern cantons the national feeling was more

energetically roused. The Viromandui (about Arras), the Atrebates

(about St. Quentin), the German Aduatuci (about Namur), but above

all the Nervii (in Hainault) with their not inconsiderable body

of clients, little inferior in number to the Suessiones and Bellovaci,

far superior to them in valour and vigorous patriotic spirit,

concluded a second and closer league, and assembled their forces

on the upper Sambre. Celtic spies informed them most accurately

of the movements of the Roman army; their own local knowledge,

and the high tree-barricades which were formed everywhere in these

districts to obstruct the bands of mounted robbers who often

visited them, allowed the allies to conceal their own operations

for the most part from the view of the Romans. When these arrived

on the Sambre not far from Bavay, and the legions were occupied

in pitching their camp on the crest of the left bank, while

the cavalry and light infantry were exploring the opposite heights,

the latter were all at once assailed by the whole mass of the enemy's

forces and driven down the hill into the river. In a moment

the enemy had crossed this also, and stormed the heights of the left

bank with a determination that braved death. Scarcely was there

time left for the entrenching legionaries to exchange the mattock

for the sword; the soldiers, many without helmets, had to fight

just as they stood, without line of battle, without plan, without

proper command; for, owing to the suddenness of the attack

and the intersection of the ground by tall hedges, the several

divisions had wholly lost their communications. Instead of a battle

there arose a number of unconnected conflicts. Labienus with the left

wing overthrew the Atrebates and pursued them even across

the river. The Roman central division forced the Viromandui down

the declivity. But the right wing, where the general himself

was present, was outflanked by the far more numerous Nervii

the more easily, as the central division carried away by its

own success had evacuated the ground alongside of it, and even

the half-ready camp was occupied by the Nervii; the two legions,

each separately rolled together into a dense mass and assailed

in front and on both flanks, deprived of most of their officers

and their best soldiers, appeared on the point of being broken and cut

to pieces. The Roman camp-followers and the allied troops were already

fleeing in all directions; of the Celtic cavalry whole divisions,

like the contingent of the Treveri, galloped off at full speed,

that from the battle-field itself they might announce at home

the welcome news of the defeat which had been sustained. Everything

was at stake. The general himself seized his shield and fought

among the foremost; his example, his call even now inspiring enthusiasm,

induced the wavering ranks to rally. They had already in some

measure extricated themselves and had at least restored the connection

between the two legions of this wing, when help came up--

partly down from the crest of the bank, where in the interval

the Roman rearguard with the baggage had arrived, partly

from the other bank of the river, where Labienus had meanwhile penetrated

to the enemy's camp and taken possession of it, and now, perceiving

at length the danger that menaced the right wing, despatched

the victorious tenth legion to the aid of his general. The Nervii,

separated from their confederates and simultaneously assailed

on all sides, now showed, when fortune turned, the same heroic courage

as when they believed themselves victors; still over the pile

of corpses of their fallen comrades they fought to the last man.

According to their own statement, of their six hundred senators

only three survived this day.

Subjugation of the Belgae

After this annihilating defeat the Nervii, Atrebates, and Viromandui

could not but recognize the Roman supremacy. The Aduatuci, who arrived

too late to take part in the fight on the Sambre, attempted still to hold

their ground in the strongest of their towns (on the mount Falhize

near the Maas not far from Huy), but they too soon submitted. A nocturnal

attack on the Roman camp in front of the town, which they ventured

after the surrender, miscarried; and the perfidy was avenged

by the Romans with fearful severity. The clients of the Aduatuci,

consisting of the Eburones between the Maas and Rhine and other

small adjoining tribes, were declared independent by the Romans,

while the Aduatuci taken prisoners were sold under the hammer en masse

for the benefit of the Roman treasury. It seemed as if the fate

which had befallen the Cimbri still pursued even this last

Cimbrian fragment. Caesar contented himself with imposing

on the other subdued tribes a general disarmament and furnishing

of hostages. The Remi became naturally the leading canton

in Belgic, like the Haedui in central Gaul; even in the latter

several clans at enmity with the Haedui preferred to rank

among the clients of the Remi. Only the remote maritime

cantons of the Morini (Artois) and the Menapii (Flanders and Brabant),

and the country between the Scheldt and the Rhine inhabited in great

part by Germans, remained still for the present exempt from Roman

invasion and in possession of their hereditary freedom.

Expeditions against the Maritime Cantons

Venetian War

The History of Rome, Book V The Establishment of the Military Monarchy · 第 8 / 19 章