CHAPTER III.

PLANTS CULTIVATED FOR THEIR FLOWERS, OR FOR THE ORGANS WHICH ENVELOP

THEM.

+Clove+—_Caryophyllus aromaticus_, Linnæus.

The clove used for domestic purposes is the calix and flower-bud of a

plant belonging to the order of Myrtaceæ. Although the plant has been

often described and very well drawn from cultivated specimens, some

doubt remains as to its nature when wild. I spoke of it in my

_Geographical Botany_ in 1855, but it does not appear that the question

has made any further progress since then, which induces me to repeat

here what I said then.

“The clove must have come originally from the Moluccas,” as Rumphius

asserts,[777] for its cultivation was limited two centuries ago to a few

little islands in this archipelago. I cannot, however, find any proof

that the true clove tree, with peduncles and aromatic buds, has been

found in a wild state. Rumphius[778] considers that a plant of which he

gives a description, and a drawing under the name _Caryophyllum

sylvestre_, belongs to the same species, and this plant is wild

throughout the Moluccas. A native told him that the cultivated clove

trees degenerate into this form, and Rumphius himself found a plant of

_C. sylvestre_ in a deserted plantation of cultivated cloves.

Nevertheless plate 3 differs from plate 1 of the cultivated clove in the

shape of the leaves and of the teeth of the calix. I do not speak of

plate 2, which appears to be an abnormal form of the cultivated clove.

Rumphius says that _C. sylvestre_ has no aromatic properties; now, as a

rule, the aromatic properties are more developed in the wild plants of a

species than in the cultivated plants. Sonnerat[779] also publishes

figures of the true clove and of a spurious clove found in a small

island near the country of the Papuans. It is easy to see that his

false clove differs completely by its blunt leaves from the true clove,

and also from the two species of Rumphius. I cannot make up my mind to

class all these different plants, wild and cultivated, together, as all

authors have done.[780] It is especially necessary to exclude plate 120

of Sonnerat, which is admitted in the _Botanical Magazine_. An

historical account of the cultivation of the clove, and of its

introduction into different countries, will be found in the last-named

work, in the _Dictionnaire d’Agriculture_, and in the dictionaries of

natural history.

If it be true, as Roxburgh says,[781] that the Sanskrit language had a

name, _luvunga_, for the clove, the trade in this spice must date from a

very early epoch, even supposing the name to be more modern than the

true Sanskrit. But I doubt its genuine character, for the Romans would

have known of a substance so easily transported, and it does not appear

that it was introduced into Europe before the discovery of the Moluccas

by the Portuguese.

+Hop+—_Humulus Lupulus_, Linnæus.

The hop is wild in Europe from England and Sweden as far south as the

mountains of the Mediterranean basin, and in Asia as far as Damascus, as

the south of the Caspian Sea, and of Eastern Siberia,[782] but it is not

found in India, the north of China, or the basin of the river Amur.[783]

In spite of the entirely wild appearance of the hop in Europe in

districts far from cultivation, it has been sometimes asked if it is not

of Asiatic origin.[784] I do not think this can be proved, nor even that

it is likely. The fact that the Greeks and Latins have not spoken of the

use of the hop in making beer is easily explained, as they were almost

entirely unacquainted with this drink. If the Greeks have not mentioned

the plant, it is simply perhaps because it is rare in their country.

From the Italian name _lupulo_ it seems likely that Pliny speaks of it

with other vegetables under the name _lupus salictarius_.[785] That the

custom of brewing with hops only became general in the Middle Ages

proves nothing, except that other plants were formerly employed, as is

still the case in some districts. The Kelts, the Germans, other peoples

of the north and even of the south who had the vine, made beer[786]

either of barley or of other fermented grain, adding in certain cases

different vegetable substances—the bark of the oak or of the tamarisk,

for instance, or the fruits of _Myrica gale_.[787] It is very possible

that they did not soon discover the advantages of the hop, and that even

after these were recognized, they employed wild hops before beginning to

cultivate them. The first mention of hop-gardens occurs in an act of

donation made by Pepin, father of Charlemagne, in 768.[788] In the

fourteenth century it was an important object of culture in Germany, but

it began in England only under Henry VIII.[789]

The common names of the hop only furnish negative indications as to its

origin. There is no Sanskrit name,[790] and this agrees with the absence

of the species in the region of the Himalayas, and shows that the early

Aryan peoples had not noticed and employed it. I have quoted before[791]

some of the European names, showing their diversity, although some few

of them may be derived from a common stock. Hehn, the philologist, has

treated of their etymology, and shown how obscure it is, but he has not

mentioned the names totally distinct from _humle_, _hopf_ or _hop_, and

_chmeli_ of the Scandinavian, Gothic, and Slav races; for example,

_Apini_ in Lette, _Apwynis_ in Lithuanian, _tap_ in Esthonian, _blust_

in Illyrian,[792] which have evidently other roots. This variety tends

to confirm the theory that the species existed in Europe before the

arrival of the Aryan nations. Several different peoples must have

distinguished, known, and used this plant successively, which confirms

its extension in Europe and in Asia before it was used in brewing.

+Carthamine+—_Carthamus tinctorius_, Linnæus.

The composite annual which produces the dye called carthamine is one of

the most ancient cultivated species. Its flowers are used for dyeing in

red or yellow, and the seeds yield oil.

The grave-cloths which wrap the ancient Egyptian mummies are dyed with

carthamine,[793] and quite recently fragments of the plant have been

found in the tombs discovered at Deir el Bahari.[794] Its cultivation

must also be ancient in India, since there are two Sanskrit names for

it, _cusumbha_ and _kamalottara_, of which the first has several

derivatives in the modern languages of the peninsula.[795] The Chinese

only received carthamine in the second century B.C., when Chang-kien

brought it back from Bactriana.[796] The Greeks and Latins were probably

not acquainted with it, for it is very doubtful whether this is the

plant which they knew as _cnikos_ or _cnicus_.[797] At a later period

the Arabs contributed largely to diffuse the cultivation of carthamine,

which they named _qorton_, _kurtum_, whence _carthamine_, or _usfur_, or

_ihridh_, or _morabu_,[798] a diversity indicating an ancient existence

in several countries of Western Asia or of Africa. The progress of

chemistry threatens to do away with the cultivation of this plant as of

many others, but it still subsists in the south of Europe, in the East,

and throughout the valley of the Nile.[799]

No botanist has found the carthamine in a really wild state. Authors

doubtfully assign to it an origin in India or Africa, in Abyssinia in

particular, but they have never seen it except in a cultivated state, or

with every appearance of having escaped from cultivation.[800]

Mr. Clarke,[801] formerly director of the Botanical Gardens in Calcutta,

who has lately studied the _Compositæ_ of India, includes the species

only as a cultivated one. The summary of our modern knowledge of the

plants of the Nile region, including Abyssinia, by Schweinfurth and

Ascherson,[802] only indicates it as a cultivated species, nor does the

list of the plants observed by Rohlfs on his recent journey mention a

wild carthamine.[803]

As the species has not been found wild either in India or in Africa, and

as it has been cultivated for thousands of years in both countries, the

idea occurred to me of seeking its origin in the intermediate region; a

method which had been successful in other cases.

Unfortunately, the interior of Arabia is almost unknown. Forskal, who

has visited the coasts of Yemen has learnt nothing about the carthamine;

nor is it mentioned among the plants of Botta and of Bové. But an Arab,

Abu Anifa, quoted by Ebn Baithar, a thirteenth-century writer, expressed

himself as follows:[804]—“_Usfur_, this plant furnishes a substance used

as a dye; there are two kinds, one cultivated and one wild, which both

grow in Arabia, of which the seeds are called _elkurthum_.” Abu Anifa

was very likely right.

+Saffron+—_Crocus sativus_, Linnæus.

The saffron was cultivated in very early times in the west of Asia. The

Romans praised the saffron of Cilicia, which they preferred to that

grown in Italy.[805] Asia Minor, Persia, and Kashmir have been for a

long time the countries which export the most. India gets it from

Kashmir[806] at the present day. Roxburgh and Wallich do not mention it

in their works. The two Sanskrit names mentioned by Piddington[807]

probably applied to the substance saffron brought from the West, for the

name _kasmirajamma_ appears to indicate its origin in Kashmir. The other

name is _kunkuma_. The Hebrew word _karkom_ is commonly translated

saffron, but it more probably applies to carthamine, to judge from the

name of the latter in Arabic.[808] Besides, the saffron is not

cultivated in Egypt or in Arabia. The Greek name is _krokos_.[809]

Saffron, which recurs in all modern European languages, comes from the

Arabic _sahafaran_,[810] _zafran_.[811] The Spaniards, nearer to the

Arabs, call it _azafran_. The Arabic name itself comes from _assfar_,

yellow.

Trustworthy authors say that _C. sativus_ is wild in Greece[812] and in

the Abruzzi mountains in Italy.[813] Maw, who is preparing a monograph

of the genus Crocus, based on a long series of observations in gardens

and in herbaria, connects with _C. sativus_ six forms which are found

wild in mountainous districts from Italy to Kurdistan. None of these, he

says,[814] are identical with the cultivated variety; but certain forms

described under other names (_C. Orisnii_, _C. Cartwrightianus_, _C.

Thomasii_), hardly differ from it. These are from Italy and Greece.

The cultivation of saffron, of which the conditions are given in the

_Cours d’Agriculture_ by Gasparin, and in the _Bulletin de la Société

d’Acclimatation_ for 1870, is becoming more and more rare in Europe and

Asia.[815] It has sometimes had the effect of naturalizing the species

for a few years at least in localities where it appears to be wild.

Origin of Cultivated Plants The International Scientific Series Volume XLVIII · 第 4 / 11 章