COALBROOKDALE.

As an important part of the parish of Madeley, still more as a locality

famous on account of its fine castings and other productions,

Coalbrookdale is deserving of a much further notice than has incidentally

been given on previous pages in speaking of the Darbys and Reynoldses.

There are few people perhaps in the kingdom who have not heard or who do

not know something of Coalbrookdale; and there are none, probably, who

pass through it by rail who do not peer through the windows of the

carriage to catch a passing glimpse of its more prominent features.

These may be readily grouped, for the benefit of those who have not seen

them, but who may read this book, as follows. In the trough of the

valley lie the works, stretching along in the direction of the stream,

formerly of more importance to the operations carried on in the various

workshops than it is at present. Upon the slope of the hill on the

south-eastern side the Church, the palatial looking Literary and

Scientific Institute, built for the benefit of the workmen, meet the eye,

and the more humble looking Methodist chapel. On both sides are goodly

looking houses and villa-like residences, where dwell the men of

directing minds; whilst here and there are thin sprinklings of workmen’s

cottages—few in number compared with the hands employed. A few strips of

grass land intervene, whilst above are wooded ridges with pleasant walks,

and to the west some curiously rounded knolls, between which the

Wellington and Craven Arms branch railway runs, sending down a siding for

the accommodation of the works.

These are the chief features which strike the eye, and which would come

out into prominence in photographic views taken to shew what

Coalbrookdale now is. The buildings are comparatively of modern

construction, but quaint half-timbered houses, rejoicing in the whitewash

livery of former times, suggest a phase of Coalbrookdale history much

anterior to that other buildings indicate. It is not difficult indeed to

depict the earlier stages of the progress the little valley has passed

through from its first primitive aspect to the present; there are, for

instance, in some of its many windings green nooks and pleasant corners

where nature yet reigns, and where lovers of a quiet ramble may feast

their eyes and indulge their imaginations, undisturbed by the hammering,

and whirl of wheels, lower down. Such a spot is that to which the

visitor is led by following the stream above the pool, crossed by a

footbridge. To the left of the path is Dale House, Sunnyside, the

Friends Meeting House, and the road to Little Wenlock. Little is seen of

the brook on the right of the path, but its presence on the margin of the

slope is made known beneath over-hanging bushes by prattlings over

stones, and a waterfall from some ledges of rock. Following it higher up

it is found to be partially fed by droppings from rocks dyed by mineral

colours of varying hue, and to present curious petrifactions, rarely

permitted however to attain any great proportions. The place is

variously called _La Mole_ and Lum Hole, and speculations have been

indulged in as to each derivation. The former would, of course, suggest

a French origin. Lum is Welsh, and signifies a point, as in Pumlummon,

now ordinarily called Plinlimmon, or the hill with five points. It is

quite certain that the valley here terminates in a point, but whether

this has anything to do with it or not we cannot say. All we say of it

is that it is a quiet little sylvan retreat, with wooded heights, green

slopes, and precipitous yellow rocks, at the foot of which the stream is

treasured up and forms a glassy lakelet. But this stream, in which six

centuries since “Lovekin” the fisherman set his baited lines, long ago

was made to do other service than that of soothing the listening ear, or

paying tribute of its trout to the abbot of Wenlock. The choice of the

situation for manufacturing operations was no doubt due to woods like

these, which supplied the needed fuel; but much more to the motive power

furnished by the stream, for turning the great wheels required to produce

the blast, and work the ponderous hammers which shaped the metal.

Brave and strong as these Dale men were, their muscles were too weak for

the work demanded. As Vulcan found he needed stronger journeymen than

those of flesh and blood to forge the thunderbolts of Jove, so an

imperative necessity, a growing demand, led men here to seek a more

compelling force to blow their leathern bellows, to lift their huge forge

hammers, than animal force could supply. Woods were no longer estimated

by _pannage_ yielded for swine, but by the fuel supplied for reducing the

stubborn ore to pigs of another kind. Brooks were pounded up, streams

were turned back upon themselves, and their treasured waters husbanded as

a capital of force to be disposed of as occasion required. Dryads now

fled the woods and Naiads the streams,—as beams and shafts and cranks

were reared or creaked beneath the labours they performed.

The presence of coal and iron ore could not have been inducements for the

first ironworkers to settle here; neither tradition nor facts warrant the

supposition that either were ever found in the valley. The first

syllable of the name is deceptive, and the probability is that it was

neither _Coal_ nor _Cole_-brook originally, although coal appears to have

been brought here for use more than five centuries ago from places just

outside. Wood fuel seems to have been growing scarce as far back as the

first quarter of the fourteenth century, judging from an application on

the part of a Walter de Caldbrook to the Prior of Wenlock, to whom the

manor belonged, for a license to have a man to dig coals in “Le

Brockholes” for one year. It is not unlikely that this Walter de

Caldbrook had a forge or smithy in the Dale; a situation chosen on

account of the stream, which served to furnish him with motive power for

his machinery. This seems all the more probable from the fact that

distinct mention of such smithy is made in Henry the Eighth’s time, and

that it is called “Smithy Place,” and “Caldbrooke Smithy,” {277} in the

deed or grant by which the manor was conveyed by the King to Robert

Brook, signed at Westminster and dated July 23, 1544. (See page 59).

The fact too that this smithy was still called Caldbrook Smithy

strengthens the suppositious, both as to the name and as to the fact that

the Caldbrookes used the Brockholes coal for their smithy in the Dale.

For smith’s work coal has always been preferred to wood; but the word

smithy did not then strictly mean what it now does; that is a smith’s

shop; but a place where iron was made in blooms. Thus the “Smithies,”

near Willey, at present so called, was a place where there were small

iron-making forges, as heaps of slag there now testify; which forges were

blown with leathern bellows, by means of water power, a man having to

tread them to increase the pressure.

Again, the word “Place,” which is a Saxon term for locality, situation,

or a particular portion of space, itself indicates an establishment on a

scale greater than a modern smithy. The words in the deed are “Smithy

Place and New House.” And again, “the rights and privileges attached to

the whole of the place and buildings that go under the name of The Smithy

Place, and Newhouse, called Caldbrooke Smithy, with its privileges” &c.

This Newhouse long ago, no doubt, had become an old house. At any rate

we know of no house answering to this description at present, unless it

is the half-timbered house near the Lower Forge; and if so this house

must be about 100 years older than the one which has the date upon it at

the forge higher up, shewing it to have been built a century later, or in

1642: and both forges no doubt were then in existence. The latter would

be about the period when the flame of Civil War was bursting forth in

various parts of the kingdom, and when Richard Baxter, whose old house

still stands at Eaton Constantine, was witnessing the battle of Edgehill

and others. This old house is such a fair specimen of the half-timbered

structures of two centuries and a half or three centuries ago that we add

a representation.

There are a number of square iron plates at the Lower Forge supposed to

have been hearth-plates, with the following dates and initials:—

I. H. T. K. W. I. E. R.

1602. 1609. 1627.

T. A. I. A. B. S.

1653. 1654. 1693.

T. E.

1706.

The one with the date 1609 has a head cast upon it, and the ‘W’ was for

the surname of one of the early proprietors or partners named Wolfe, a

member of the same family that gave shelter to King Charles at Madeley:

and ‘B’ may have signified Brooke, the family who resided at the Court

House, Madeley, and to whom the manor belonged at that time. There is

too a beam with the date 1658, being a bearer in an old blast furnace,

which is known to have been renewed by Abraham Darby in 1777. This is

supposed to have been brought from Leighton, where there was a furnace in

blast in 1707. Thus for long periods, during deadly feuds and troubled

times, absorbed in the simple arts of industry, these men appear to have

toiled on. During the Civil Wars, when Cromwell and his Ironsides were

preparing for the pages of history one of its most striking passages,

they worked their bloomeries, taking no part, save that a clerk in the

Shropshire Ironworks was found to bear to the Protector news of the

successes of his troops.

[Picture: Baxter’s House as it is, slightly renovated]

It may therefore be supposed that when the first Abraham Darby came to

the Dale he found works already in existence. Mr. Smiles says “he took

the lease of a little furnace which had existed at the place for over a

century”; and, fortunately, since his time, the commencement of the 18th

century, (1709), records of the proceedings have been carefully kept, so

that there is little difficulty in tracing the progress of the art, or in

giving prominence to important points which may serve to mark such

progress. On page 60 are enumerated some of these discoveries, one being

the successful use of coal in iron-making, another the adaptability of

iron in bridge making, and a third to railroads. To these three starting

points in the history of the iron trade was added that of the discovery

of puddling by means of pit coal, by the Craneges; a discovery which

preceded that of Henry Cort by seventeen years. It will be seen also

from what has been already stated, that whilst Richard Reynolds laid down

the first iron rails his son William and the Coalbrookdale Co. as early

as 1800 were engaged upon locomotives to run on railways.

These stages in the history of the works down to the commencement of the

present century have been enumerated thus:—

“Abraham Darby. 1707. Letters patent for a new way of casting iron

pots, and other iron ware, in sand only, without loam or clay.”

“Ditto. 1712. First successfully superseded the use of charcoal by

that of coke in the blast furnace.”

“Abraham Darby (son of above). 1737. First used coal instead of

charcoal for converting pig iron into bar iron at the forge.”

“Ditto. 1760–63. First laid down rails of cast iron, with carriages

having axles with fixed wheels.”

“Abraham Darby (the third). The first _iron_ bridge erected over the

Severn in 1777.”

“Richard Reynolds. Letters patent to Thomas and George Cranage, for a

method of puddling, 1766.”

William, son of Richard Reynolds, invented a locomotive, upon the plans

for which the Coalbrookdale Company were engaged in 1800. This was a

_locomotive_ for _railroads_, as we have shewn on page 179. We have also

on a previous page spoken of Mr. W. Reynolds as a chemist, a fact which

is borne out by an original letter of James Watt to his friend William

Reynolds, a copy of which, being too long to insert here, will be given

on a subsequent page. Facts like these, recorded in various

publications, added to the intrinsic merits of the high class productions

of the works, naturally served to give to the establishment in the Dale a

very high position in the trade. To these too were to be added the high

integrity of the proprietors and managers of the works, a guarantee of

which was to be found in the fact that they were Quakers. In our

“History of Broseley” page 219, we have shewn that the Friends had

established themselves there as early as 1673; that a Meeting house was

erected there in 1692; and that the Darbys, the Roses, the Reynoldses,

the Fords, the Hortons and others were buried there, prior to the Meeting

house at Sunnyside being built. The fact of a man being a Quaker was a

tolerable guarantee of his being a fair dealer; and the utterance of the

name of Darby or Reynolds was sufficient to command respect.

Speaking of these works at an early stage, Mr. Smiles in his “Industrial

Biography” says:—

“By the exertions and enterprise of the Darbys, the Coalbrookdale

Works had become greatly enlarged, giving remunerative employment to

a large and increasing population. The firm had extended their

operations far beyond the boundaries of the Dale: they had

established foundries at London, Bristol, and Liverpool, and agencies

at Newcastle and Truro for the disposal of steam-engines and other

iron machinery used in the deep mines of those districts. Watt had

not yet perfected his steam-engine; but there was considerable demand

for pumping-engines of Newcomen’s construction, many of which were

made at the Coalbrookdale Works.”

One of these engines having the date 1747 was seen at Bilston in 1812.

Castings for Watt’s engines also were made here; but the first use to

which the steam-engine itself was put was the undignified one of pumping

the water which had once gone over the water-wheel back, that it may go

over it a second time.

It is not our intention to give a detailed description of the present

productions of the Coalbrookdale Works; modern castings like those of the

Albert Edward bridge, and those high art ornamental ones of a lighter

kind with which the public are familiar by means of various international

exhibitions, afford sufficient evidence that the firm occupy a position

not unworthy of their ancient renown.

It will be seen from what has been said that the religious no less than

the inventive element seems to have distinguished these men, who, so far

as we have gone were Quakers; but the brothers Cranege, who anticipated

Cort in the discovery of puddling were Wesleyans. Little seems to be

known of these men or of their families; but Dr. Edward Cranage, of the

Old Hall, Wellington is, we believe, of the same family. Another

descendant of the family writes us to say that—

“George Cranage, one of the patentees, and Thomas his brother, the

other, both married daughters of John Ward, of Eye Manor Farm, near

Leighton; the writer’s grandfather on his mother’s side. Thomas and

his wife died without issue, but George Cranage who married Ann Ward,

left two sons and five daughters; William, the elder of the sons, was

manager or in some such position at Coalbrookdale, and was concerned

in the construction of the Iron Bridge. From a small manuscript

volume of religious verses and paraphrases into verse of the Psalms

composed by him, and now in my possession, he appears to have had

some taste for literature. I have his copy of _Coke and Moore’s life

of Wesley_, _and Paradise Lost_, the latter containing his autograph.

He was, I have heard, a Wesleyan of the true type; worshipping at his

chapel regularly, but always communicating at Madeley Parish Church

on Sacrament Sundays. He lived in the house where Mr. Moses now

lives, opposite the church, which house, we believe was built for

him. He died in 1823, one son having died previously. The following

notice appeared in a Shrewsbury paper of his death:

“Suddenly, at Coalbrookdale, aged 63, Mr. Wm. Cranage, a man whose

truly benevolent nature and friendly disposition secured him the

respect and esteem of all who knew him, and whose loss as a member of

society will be much felt by his neighbours. In him the poor man

recognised a friend, the world an honest man, and the church a steady

and useful member.”

John the younger, and only other son of George, died in infancy, while

the five daughters all married in Bridgnorth or the neighbourhood.

Whilst upon the subject of old workmen at the Dale it may be well here to

introduce a notice of the Luccucks, some of whom were Quakers, but two of

whom, Benjamin and Thomas, became clergymen of the church of England.

Benjamin was apprenticed at Coalport, where he painted a set of china,

which whilst breakfasting with an English prelate he was surprised to see

produced at table. When a lad he was of a daring disposition. He would

lie down, for instance, between the rails of the Incline Plane and allow

the carriage and a boat with five tons of iron in it to pass over him,

notwithstanding the risk run of being caught and drawn over the rollers

by the hook dangling at the end of the carriage. The mother of Mr. W. G.

Norris, the present manager, and one of the proprietors, was a Luccock;

and other members of the same family are still employed in the works.

The grandfather of the former was apprenticed to the first Abraham Darby

soon after he came to the Dale. A copy of the indenture or agreement

between the parties may not be without interest at the present day. It

commences thus:

“Abraham Darby and Thomas Luccuck, concluded and made this 13 day of

June, 1714, between Abraham Darby, of the city of Bristol, Smith, in

behalf of himself and rest of his co-partners in the ironworks of

Coalbrookdale, in the County of Salop, on the one part; and Thomas

Luccuck, of the parish of Norfield, in the County of Worcester, who

agrees to serve in the art and mystery of making or casting of iron

pots and kettles, &c.”

History of Madeley including Ironbridge, Coalbrookdale, and Coalport · 第 86 / 112 题