CHAPTER IV

GALLOMANIA IN ENGLAND (1600-85)

The English have always been divided between a wish to admire and a

tendency to detest us. France is for her neighbour a coquette whimsical

enough to deserve to be beaten and loved at the same time. The initial

misunderstanding between the two nations endures through ages, sometimes

threatening open war, more seldom ready to be cleared up. A few miles of

deep sea cuts Great Britain off from the rest of Europe. As England has

retained no possessions on the Continent, no intermediary race has sprung

up, as is the case with most of the Western Powers on their borderlands.

Thus the French and Germans are linked together by the Flemings, Alsatians,

and Swiss; the Savoyards and Corsicans are a cross between the French and

the Italians; and before reaching Spain, a Frenchman must traverse vast

tracts of land inhabited by Basques and Catalans; but a few hours' sail

from Calais to Dover, from Rotterdam or Antwerp to Harwich will bring a

traveller from the Continent into an entirely new world. To avoid

disagreements, in the past infinite tact and patience were requisite on

both sides of the Channel: our indiscreet friends made us unpopular with

their fellow-countrymen. The story of English gallomania, which is amusing

enough, is thus also instructive, as a few episodes will show.[106]

In the sixteenth century, Italy, just emerging from her glorious

Renaissance, charmed England; but common interests, political and

economical necessities, a degree of civilisation almost the same, prevented

her from neglecting us altogether. In the following century, the marriage

of Charles I. with a daughter of Henri IV. made French fashions acceptable

for a time in Whitehall. But misfortune overtook the Stuarts. The Great

Rebellion broke out, Charles I. was put to death and his son exiled. During

over twelve years, the future King of England lived in French-speaking

countries; when restored to his throne, he could not help bringing back our

fashions, literature, manners of thinking and doing; of all the Kings of

England, from Plantagenets to Edward VII., Charles II., in spite of some

diplomatic reserve and occasional outbursts of insularity, proved the most

amenable to French influence: perhaps that is why his popularity was so

great; the English would admire France without stint, if France were but

her finest colony.

If the courtiers imitated French manners to please the monarch, the

citizens did so to copy the courtiers; so that, about 1632 and 1670, all

the frivolous, unreflective idlers that England numbered, were bent on

appearing French. Few examples are more striking of the power of the

curious desire that possesses ordinary mankind to astonish simple souls by

aping the eccentricities of the higher classes.

The mania was carefully studied by contemporary writers: they describe the

morbid symptoms with so much accuracy and minuteness as to render all

conjectures superfluous.

The disease was developed chiefly by travelling. Attracted by the mildness

of a foreign climate and dazzled by the luxurious life of the nobles there,

the young Englishman feels estranged from his native land and the rude

simplicity of his home. When he comes back, the contrast between his new

ideas and his old surroundings, the conflict waged in his own heart between

Continental influence and insularity, are fit themes for a tragedy or at

least a tragi-comedy. The character of the frenchified Englishman appears

several times on the stage in Beaumont and Fletcher's _Monsieur Thomas_, in

Marston's _What you Will_, in Davenant's _Fair Favourite_. Others, again,

picture the young fop just back from Paris, clad in strange garments,

praising foreign manners, so affected as to disregard his mother-tongue.

About 1609 or 1610, Beaumont and Fletcher sketch the man's character. "The

dangers of the merciless Channel 'twixt Dover and Calais, five long hours'

sail, with three poor weeks' victuals. Then to land dumb, unable to inquire

for an English host, to remove from city to city, by most chargeable

post-horse, like one that rode in quest of his mother-tongue. And all these

almost invincible labours performed for your mistress, to be in danger to

forsake her, and to put on new allegiance to some French lady, who is

content to change language with your laughter, and after your whole year

spent in tennis and broken speech, to stand to the hazard of being laughed

at, at your return, and have tales made on you by the chamber-maids."[107]

As a fervid preacher finds hearers, so the traveller induces some of his

friends to share his mania. The infection spreads in spite of ridicule:

"Would you believe, when you this monsieur see,

That his whole body should speake French, not he?

That he, untravell'd, should be French so much,

As Frenchmen in his company should seem Dutch?...

Or is it some French statue? No: 't doth move,

And stoope, and cringe...."[108]

The most frequent symptom of gallomania in early, as in recent times, is to

use French words in everyday conversation. So Sir Thomas More laughed at

the fop who affected to pronounce English as French but whose French

sounded strangely like English.[109]

In the sixteenth century, as in the Middle Ages, French was as generally

used as Latin. "In England," wrote Peletier, "at least among princes and in

their courts, all their discourses are in French."[110] A few years later,

Burghley advised his son Thomas, then travelling on the Continent, to write

in Latin or in French.[111] In schools, French was taught with great zeal,

and, according to Sylvester, the future translator of Du Bartas, it was

forbidden to speak English, however trivial the matter, under penalty of

wearing the foolscap.

In spite of these stringent methods of education, backward pupils were not

lacking. They were sent to France, but even this desperate remedy was

sometimes unavailing; witness Beaumont and Fletcher's youth whose mother,

asking him on his return to speak French, was shocked at hearing only a few

broken words of abuse.[112]

Yet it was imperative to speak French correctly at Queen Henrietta's Court.

Of course the ladies succeeded. In Blount's Preface to Lyly's plays we read

that "the beautie in court which could not parley euphuisme, was as litle

regarded, as shee which now there, speakes not French."[113]

[Illustration: A COQUETTE AT HER TOILET-TABLE]

What was the distinctive mark of a good education under Charles I., was

equally so under Charles II. "All the persons of quality in England could

speak French." The Queen, the Duchess of York spoke "marvellously

well."[114] There was no need to know English at Whitehall: few French

gentlemen troubled to learn it, but the English unfortunate enough not to

know French had to conceal the defect. These would repeat the same foreign

words or phrases; "to smatter French" being "meritorious."[115] "Can there

be," exclaims Shadwell, "any conversation well drest without French in the

first place to lard it!"[116] In an amusing scene, Dryden shows a coquette

rehearsing a polite conversation: "Are you not a most precious damsel," she

says to her teacher, "to retard all my visits for want of language, when

you know you are paid so well for furnishing me with new words for my daily

conversation? Let me die, if I have not run the risque already to speak

like one of the vulgar; and if I have one phrase left in all my store that

is not threadbare and _use_, and fit for nothing but to be thrown to

peasants."[117]

Fops followed the example set by coquettes. Monsieur de Paris and Sir

Fopling Flutter "show their breeding" by "speaking in a silly soft tone of

a voice, and use all the foolish French words that will infallibly make

their conversation charming."[118]

After an interval of a hundred years, the reproaches of Sir Thomas More

were repeated. If we must credit Shadwell, the youth of England had

forgotten their English through studying foreign languages with too much

application: they return "from Paris with a smattering of that mighty

universal language, without being ever able to write true English."[119]

And, again, "all our sparks are so refined they scarce speak a sentence

without a French word, and though they seldom arrive at good French, yet

they get enough to spoil their English."[120]

From time immemorial Europe has learned from Paris polished manners and the

inimitable art of good tailoring. In the sixteenth-century drama, the

tailors are invariably French. Harrison deplored the introduction of new

fashions, regretting the time "when an Englishman was known abroad by his

own cloth, and contented himself at home with his fine kersey hosen, and a

mean slop, a doublet of sad tawny or black velvet or other comely silk."

Then he proceeds to inveigh against the "garish colours brought in by the

consent of the French, who think themselves the gayest men when they have

most diversities of jags (ribbons)" and "the short French breeches" that

liken his countrymen "unto dogs in doublets." The dramatists constantly

mention "French hose, hoods, masks, and sticks," thus attesting the vogue

of the Paris fashions. In one of Chapman's plays, two shipwrecked gentlemen

cast ashore at the mouth of the Thames think they have reached the coasts

of France; seeing a couple of natives drawing near, one of them exclaims:

"I knew we were in France: dost thou think our Englishmen are so

frenchified, that a man knows not whether he be in France or in England,

when he sees them?"[121]

The lover of France was a true epicure as well as a fop. In the houses of

the nobility the cooks were invariably French. "I'll have none," says one

of Massinger's characters, "shall touch what I shall eat but Frenchmen and

Italians; they wear satin, and dish no meat but in silver."[122] We must go

to Overbury for the portrait of a French cook "who doth not feed the belly,

but the palate. The serving-men call him the last relique of popery, that

makes men fast against their conscience.... He can be truly said to be no

man's fellow but his master's: for the rest of his servants are starved by

him.... The Lord calls him his alchymist that can extract gold out of

herbs, roots, mushrooms, or anything.... He dare not for his life come

among the butchers; for sure they would quarter and bake him after the

English fashion, he's such an enemy to beef and mutton."[123]

Gallomania quickly spread after the Restoration. The Record Office has

preserved the name of the French tailor, Claude Sourceau, who helped the

Englishman, John Allen, to make Charles II.'s coronation robes.[124] As

early as October 20, 1660, Pepys, dining with Lord Sandwich, heard the

latter "talk very high how he would have a French cooke, and a master of

his horse, and his lady and child to wear black patches"; which was quite

natural, since "he was become a perfect courtier"; and on December 6, 1661,

My Lady Wright declared in Pepys' hearing "that none were fit to be

courtiers, but such as had been abroad and knew fashions." Soon the motto

at Court was to

"Admire whate'er they find abroad,

But nothing here, though e'er so good."[125]

Hamilton tells in his delightful _Memoires de Gramont_ how every week there

came from France "perfumed gloves, pocket-mirrors, dressing-cases,

apricot-jam and essences." Every month the Paris milliners sent over to

London a jointed doll, habited after the manner of the stars that shone at

the Court of the Grand Monarch.[126] According to M. Renan, the dreamy

Breton blue eyes of Mademoiselle de Keroualle conquered Charles II.; but we

feel inclined to think that the monarch appreciated also her brilliant

success as a leader of fashion. As Butler satirically said, the French gave

the English "laws for pantaloons, port-cannons, periwigs and

feathers."[127] Every one spoke of "bouillis, ragouts, fricasses," bordeaux

and champagne were drunk instead of national beer.[128]

[Illustration: THE DUCHESS OF PORTSMOUTH AS A LEADER OF FASHION]

The City ladies tried to outdo the Court belles. One of them "had always

the fashion a month before any of the Court ladies; never wore anything

made in England; scarce wash'd there; and had all the affected new words

sent her, before they were in print, which made her pass among fops for a

kind of French wit."[129]

The movement, of course, elicited a violent opposition. Poets and

dramatists were banded together in denouncing the subservience to France of

a portion of English society. At times, these nationalists went perhaps too

far in their praise of old manners and old fashions. Assuredly any

reasonable man will side with Sir Fopling Flutter in preferring the wax

candle, albeit from France, to the time-honoured tallow candle.[130]

Butler's notebooks, which were published a few years ago, reveal in the man

a singularly conservative state of mind. The French are the same, he

thinks, to the English nation as the Jews or the Greeks were to the Romans

of old. Fashions, cooking, books, all that comes from France is to be

abhorred.[131]

One day Evelyn, champion as he was of all generous ideas, determined to

bring his countrymen back to their forefathers' simplicity. He accordingly

wrote an "invective" against the fashions of France and proposed to adopt

in their stead the "Persian costume," "a long cassock fitted close to the

body, of black cloth, and pinked with white silk under it, and a coat over

it, and the legs ruffled with black ribbon." Under the title of _Tyrannus

or the Mode_, the pamphlet was dedicated to the King. Apparently Charles

II. was very idle at the time: the idea pleased him and he donned the

"oriental vest." Several members of the House of Commons, probably by way

of protesting against the dissoluteness of the Court, had forestalled him.

While Evelyn was gravely congratulating himself on the good effect of his

pamphlet, the King, in the vein of irrepressible "blague" that was his

characteristic trait, remarked that the "pinking upon white made his

courtiers look like so many magpies." A few days after, upon hearing that

the King of France had caused all his footmen to be put into vests, Charles

II. quietly reverted to the French fashion, "which," as Guy Miege wrote

after the Revolution, "has continued ever since."[132]

Though beaten in that particular instance, the nationalists were to carry

the day, thanks to the power of tradition and the strong individualism of

the English nation. For a hundred years at least, it had been recognised as

an assured principle that an Englishman ran the risk of depravation if he

ventured abroad.[133] What could the fancy of a few courtiers avail against

universal consent? All the satirical poets--Wyatt, Gascoigne, Bishop Hall,

Butler--had successfully declaimed against foreigners and frenchified

Englishmen. Even Charles II. applauded Howard's comedy, _The English

Monsieur_. Then, as now, for the average Englishman, Paris was

pre-eminently the pleasure-city. It was even worse at times: if gentlemen

fought private duels, it was to copy the French.[134] A man as

well-informed as the Earl of Halifax feared that the famous poisoning cases

in which the Marquise de Brinvilliers and the woman Voisin were concerned,

might find imitators in England, "since we are likely to receive hereafter

that with other fashions."[135] As the Chinese in modern America, so the

Frenchman was looked upon as a suspicious character; not altogether without

cause: the cooks, tailors, and valets, the adventurers of the Gramont type

lurking about the Court, were redolent of vice. Pepys, who had nothing of

the saint about him, could not hide his aversion for Edward Montagu's

French valet, the mysterious Eschar, most probably a spy. The great ladies

had the habit, which seems so strange to us, to be waited upon by valets

instead of maids. When the valet came from France, the pretext for scandal

was eagerly seized upon.[136]

If anglomania was unknown to France in the seventeenth century, yet

Frenchmen were found who appreciated England. Some lived at Court, during

Louis XIV.'s minority and later, when the King of England was in the pay of

his cousin, the Grand Monarch. No doubt English literature did not profit

by those good dispositions, for the simple reason that none of those

Frenchmen knew English.

Both Cardinal Mazarin and the Grande Mademoiselle caused horses to be

imported from England, but Colbert found them rather expensive. When he

received instructions to build Versailles, the minister had to be resigned

to extravagance. Henrietta of England stood in high favour with the King,

and all that came from England proved acceptable; overwhelmed with work,

responsible for the national finances, the navy and public prosperity, the

great minister was compelled to discuss trivial details; the same year as

the Treaty of Dover was signed, he corresponded with Ambassador Colbert de

Croissy about the purchase for the canal at Versailles of two "small

yachts." The boats were built in Chatham dockyard, sent to France, and

workmen were dispatched to carve and gild the figure-heads.[137]

[Illustration: POPULAR REPRESENTATON OF AN ENGLISHMAN

_After Bonnart_]

When Locke visited Paris in 1679, he found some admirers of England. He was

told that Prince de Conti, then aged seventeen, proposed to learn

English.[138] No wonder the princes of the blood were anxious to know all

about the allies of France. The King himself had shown as much curiosity as

his exalted station allowed. He had asked his envoys to forward him reports

on the government and institutions of the newly-discovered land, on the

state of arts and sciences there, on the latest Court scandals. In the

Colbert papers may be found reports on the state of the English navy, by

superintendent Arnoul, a learned disquisition on the origin of Parliaments,

and amusing bits of information, such as the following, about Charles II.'s

Queen: "She is extremely clean and takes a bath once every six weeks,

winter and summer. Nobody ever sees her in her bath, not even her maids,

curtains being drawn around."

When Gilbert Burnet visited Paris in 1685, he was asked on behalf of the

Archbishop if he would write in English a memoir of Louis XIV. From which

significant fact it may be inferred that in official circles the state of

public opinion in England was beginning to be taken into account.[139]

In all these manifestations of gallomania and incipient anglomania, there

is ample matter for ridicule. We should gladly give up the imitation of

French fashions and French cooking and the passion for English horses and

yachts, just to have once more an instance of the noble spirit of rivalry

that Spenser showed when, after reading Du Bellay's poems, he exclaimed:--

"France, fruitful of brave wits."

Yet efforts were being made during the whole seventeenth century to bring

about an understanding between the two neighbouring nations. Unluckily the

methods pursued were calculated to make France most unpopular with the

larger section of the English public.

FOOTNOTES:

[106] See on the subject Sir Sidney Lee, _French Renaissance in England_;

Upham, _French Influence in English Literature_, Charlanne, _L'influence

francaise en Angleterre au XVIIe Siecle_.

[107] _Scornful Lady_, Act I. Sc. 1.

[108] Chalmers, _English Poets_, v. p. 506.

[109]

"Et Gallice linguam sonat Britannicam,

Et Gallice omnem, praeter unam Gallicam,

Nam Gallicam solam sonat Britannice."

_Thomae Mori Lucubrationes_ (Basil, 1563), p. 209.

[110] _Dialogues de l'orthografe_, p. 60 (1550).

[111] _State Papers, Dom._, Eliz. xix. No. 35; see also _The Travels of

Nicander Nucius_ (Camden Soc.), p. 13; Paul Jove, _Descriptio Britanniae_,

Venice, 1548. "Aulae et foro Gallicus sermo familiaris."

[112] _The Coxcomb_, Act IV. Sc. 1 (1610)

[113] _Six Court Comedies_, 1632.

[114] Mauger, _French Grammar_, pp. 189, 217, 234.

[115] Butler, _On our Ridiculous Imitation of the French_.

[116] _Bury Fair_, Act II. Sc. 1.

[117] _Marriage a la Mode_, Act III. Sc. 1.

[118] Etheredge, _Man of Mode_, Act II. Sc. 1.

[119] _Virtuoso_, Act I. Sc. 1.

[120] _True Widow_, Act II. Sc. 1.

[121] _Eastward Hoe_, Act II. Sc. 1 (1605).

[122] _City Madam_, Act I. Sc. 1 (1632).

[123] _Characters_, p. 144 (1614).

[124] _State Papers, Dom._, 1665-1666, p. 481.

[125] Butler, _op. cit._

[126] _Spectator_, No. 277.

[127] _Hudibras_, iii. 923.

[128] "Put about a cup of ale, is this not better than your foolish French

kickshaw claret."--Shadwell, _Epsom-Wells_, Act I. Sc. 1.

[129] _True Widow_, Act I. Sc. 1.

[130] "How can you breathe in a room where there's grease frying? Advise My

Lady to burn wax lights."--_Man of Mode_, Act IV. Sc. 1.

[131] _Characters_, pp. 419, 424, 469.

[132] See Evelyn, _Diary_, 18th-30th October 1666; Pepys, _Diary_,

15th-17th October, 22nd November 1666; Miege, _New State of England_, ii.

p. 38; _State Papers, Dom._, 1666, p. 191.

[133] Ascham, _The Schole-master_, 1570, pp. 26 _ssq._; Nash, _The

Unfortunate Traveller_, 1587 (_Works_, ii. p. 300)

[134] Beaumont and Fletcher, _Little French Lawyer_, Act I. Sc. 1.

[135] _Savile Correspondence_, p. 143.

[136] Etheredge, _Man of Mode_, Act IV. Sc. 2.

[137] _Lettres, Memoires et Instructions de Colbert_, v. p. 322.

[138] King, _Life and Letters of Locke_, p. 83.

[139] Clarke and Foxcroft, _Life of Burnet_, p. 210.

The Anglo-French Entente in the Seventeenth Century · 第 4 / 11 章