CHAPTER II.

ENLARGING HORIZONS. _SORDELLO_.

Zwei Seelen wohnen, ach, in meiner Brust,

Die eine will sich von der andern trennen;

Die eine hält in derber Liebeslust

Sich an die Welt mit klammernden Organen;

Die andre hebt gewaltsam sich vom Dust

Zu den Gefilden hoher Ahnen.

--_Faust_.

_Paracelsus_, though only a series of quasi-dramatic scenes, suggested

considerable undeveloped capacity for drama. From a career in which the

most sensational event was a dismissal from a professorship, and the

absorbing passion the thirst for knowledge, he had elicited a tragedy of

the scientific intellect. But it was equally obvious that the writer's

talent was not purely dramatic; and that his most splendid and original

endowments required some other medium than drama for their full

unfolding. The author of _Paracelsus_ was primarily concerned with

character, and with action as the mirror of character; agreeing in both

points substantially with the author of _Hamlet_. But while Browning's

energetic temperament habitually impelled him to represent character in

action, his imaginative strength did not lie in the region of action at

all, but in the region of thought; the kinds of expression of which he

had boundless command were rather those which analyse character than

those which exhibit it. The two impulses derived from temperament and

from imagination thus drew him in somewhat diverse directions; and for

some years the joy in the stir and stress and many-sided life of drama

competed with the powerful bent of the portrayer of souls, until the two

contending currents finally coalesced in the dramatic monologues of _Men

and Women_. In 1835 the solution was not yet found, but the five years

which followed were to carry Browning, not without crises of perplexity

and hesitation, far on his way towards it. _Paracelsus_ was no sooner

completed than he entered upon his kindred but more esoteric portrayal

of the soul-history of Sordello,--a study in which, with the dramatic

form, almost all the dramatic excellences of its predecessors are put

aside. But the poet was outgrowing the method; the work hung fire; and

we find him, before he had gone far with the perplexed record of that

"ineffectual angel," already "eager to freshen a jaded mind by diverting

it to the healthy natures of a grand epoch."[6]

[Footnote 6: Preface to the first edition of _Strafford_ (subsequently

omitted).]

The open-eyed man of the world and of affairs in Browning was plainly

clamouring for more expression than he had yet found. An invitation from

the first actor of the day to write a tragedy for him was not likely,

under these circumstances, to be declined; and during the whole winter

of 1836-37 the story of Sordello remained untold, while its author

plunged, with a security and relish which no one who knew only his

poetry could have foretold, into the pragmatic politics and diplomatic

intrigues of _Strafford_. The performance of the play on May 1, 1837

introduced further distractions. And _Sordello_ had made little further

progress, when, in the April of the following year, Browning embarked on

a sudden but memorable trip to the South of Europe. It gave him his

first glimpse of Italy and of the Mediterranean, and plenty of the rough

homely intercourse with men which he loved. He travelled, in a fashion

that suited his purse and his hardy nature, by a merchant vessel from

London to the Adriatic. The food was uneatable, the horrors of dirt and

discomfort portentous; but he bore them cheerfully for the sake of one

advantage,--"the solitariness of the _one_ passenger among all those

rough new creatures, _I_ like it much, and soon get deep into their

friendship."[7] Grim tragedies of the high-seas, too, came within his

ken.[8] Two or three moments of the voyage stand out for us with

peculiar distinctness: the gorgeous sunset off Cadiz bay, when he

watched the fading outlines of Gibraltar and Cape St Vincent,--ghostly

mementos of England,--not as Arnold's weary Titan, but as a Herakles

stretching a hand of help across the seas; the other sunset on the

Mediterranean, when Etna loomed against the flaming sky;[9] and, between

them, that glaring noontide on the African shore, when the "solitary

passenger," weary of shipboard and sea sickness, longed for his good

horse York in the stable at home, and scribbled his ballad of brave

horses, _How they brought the Good News_, in a blank leaf of Bartoli's

_Simboli_. The voyage ended at Trieste; and thence he passed to Venice,

brooded among her ruined palaces over Sordello, and "English Eyebright"

and all the destiny and task of the poet; and so turned homeward,

through the mountains, gathering vivid glimpses as he went of "all my

places and castles,"[10] and laying by a memory, soon to germinate, of

"delicious Asolo," "palpably fire-clothed" in the glory of his young

imagination.

[Footnote 7: _R.B._ to _E.B.B._, i. 505.]

[Footnote 8: Cf. the long letter to Miss Haworth, Orr, _Life_, p. 96.]

[Footnote 9: Cf. _Sordello_, bk. iii., end.]

[Footnote 10: Ib., p. 99.]

Thus when, in 1840, _Sordello_ was at length complete, it bore the

traces of many influences and many moods. It reflected the expanding

ideals and the critical turning-points of four years of his life. In the

earlier books the brilliant yet self-centred poet of _Paracelsus_ is

still paramount, and even the "oddish boy" who had shyly evolved

_Pauline_ is not entirely effaced. But in the later books we recognise

without difficulty the man who has mixed with the larger world, has won

some fame in letters, has immersed himself in the stirring atmosphere of

a supreme national conflict, has seen Italy, and has, in the solitude

and detachment from his _milieu_ which foreign travel brings, girded up

his loins anew for a larger and more exacting poetic task. The tangled

political dissensions of the time are set before us with the baffling

allusiveness of the expert. The Italian landscape is painted, not with

richer imagination, for nothing in Browning exceeds some passages of the

earlier books, but with more depth of colouring, more precision of

contour and expression. And he has taken the "sad disheveled form,"

Humanity, for his bride, the mate of an art which will disdain no evil

and turn away from nothing common, in the service of man. Doubtless the

result was not all gain. The intermittent composition and the shifting

points of view add an element of real ambiguity and indecision to faults

of expression which mainly spring from the swiftness and discursiveness

of a brilliant and athletic intellect. The alleged "obscurity" of the

poem is in great part a real obscurity; the profiles are at times not

merely intricate, but blurred. But he had written nothing yet, and he

was to write little after, which surpasses the finest pages of

_Sordello_ in close-packed, if somewhat elusive, splendour; the soil, as

he wrote of Italy, is full of loose fertility, and gives out

intoxicating odours at every footfall. Moreover, he can now paint the

clash and commotion of crowds, the turmoil of cities and armies, with

superb force--a capacity of which there is hardly a trace in

_Paracelsus_. Sordello himself stands out less clearly than Paracelsus

from the canvas; but the sympathetic reader finally admits that this

visionary being, who gleams ghostlike at the end of all the avenues and

vistas of the poem, whom we are always looking at but never rightly see,

is an even more fascinating figure.

He is however less historical, in spite of the abstruse historic

background upon which he moves. Of the story of Paracelsus Browning

merely reinterpreted the recorded facts; whereas he brushes aside the

greater part of the Sordello story, as told confusedly and

inconsistently by Italian and Provençal tradition. The whole later

career of the Mantuan poet as an accomplished and not unsuccessful man

of the world, as the friend of Raymond of Toulouse and Charles of Anjou,

rewarded with ample estates by the latter for substantial services,--is

either rejected as myth, or purposely ignored. To all appearance, the

actual Sordello by no means lacked ability to "fit to the finite" such

"infinity" as he possessed. And if he had the chance, as is obscurely

hinted at the close, of becoming, like Dante, the "Apollo" of the

Italian people, he hardly missed it "through disbelief that anything was

to be done." But the outward shell of his career included some

circumstances which, had they befallen a Dante, might have deeply

moulded the history of Italy. His close relations with great Guelph and

Ghibelline families would have offered extraordinary opportunities to a

patriot of genius, which, for the purposes of patriotism, remained

unused. Yet Dante, a patriot of genius if ever there was one, had given

Sordello a position of extraordinary honour in the _Purgatory_, had

allowed him to illuminate the darkness of Virgil, and to guide both the

great poets towards the Gate. The contrast offered an undeniable

problem. But Dante had himself hinted the solution by placing Sordello

among those dilatory souls whose tardy repentance involved their sojourn

in the Ante-purgatory. To a mind preoccupied, like Browning's, with the

failures of aspiring souls, this hint naturally appealed. He imagined

his Sordello, too, as a moral loiterer, who, with extraordinary gifts,

failed by some inner enervating paralysis[11] to make his spiritual

quality explicit; and who impressed contemporaries sufficiently to start

a brilliant myth of what he did not do, but had to wait for recognition

until he met the eye and lips of Dante. It is difficult not to suspect

the influence of another great poet. _Sordello_ has no nearer parallel

in literature than Goethe's _Tasso_, a picture of the eternal antagonism

between the poet and the world, for which Bordello's failure to "fit to

the finite his infinity" might have served as an apt motto. Browning has

nowhere to our knowledge mentioned _Tasso_; but he has left on record

his admiration of the beautiful sister-drama _Iphigenie_.[12]

[Footnote 11:

"Ah but to find

A certain mood enervate such a mind," &c.

--_Works_, i. 122.]

[Footnote 12: _To E.B.B._, July 7, 1846. He is "vexed" at Landor's

disparagement of the play, and quotes with approval Landor's earlier

declaration that "nothing so Hellenic had been written these two

thousand years."]

The elaboration of this conception is, however, entirely Browning's

own, and discloses at every point the individual quality of his mind.

Like _Faust_, like the Poet in the _Palace of Art_, Sordello bears the

stamp of an age in which the ideal of intellect, art, culture, and the

ideal of humanity, of social service, have both become potent

inspirations, often in apparent conflict, and continually demanding a

solution of their differences. Faust breaks away from the narrow

pedantries of the schools in order to heap upon his breast the weal and

woe of mankind, and to draw all their life and thought into the compass

of his mind. Tennyson's "glorious devil" (by a curious irony intended

for no other than Faust's creator) sets up his lordly pleasure-house

apart from the ways of men, until at last, confuted by experience, he

renounces his folly. _Sordello_ cannot claim the mature and classical

brilliance of the one, nor the limpid melodious beauty of the other; but

it approaches _Faust_ itself in its subtle soundings of the mysteries of

the intellectual life. It is a young poet's attempt to cope with the

problem of the poet's task and the poet's function, the relation of art

to life, and of life to art. Neither Goethe nor Tennyson thought more

loftily of the possibilities of poetic art. And neither insisted more

peremptorily--or rather assumed more unquestioningly--that it only

fulfils these possibilities when the poet labours in the service of man.

He is "earth's essential king," but his kingship rests upon his carrying

out the kingliest of mottoes--"Ich dien." Browning all his life had a

hearty contempt for the foppery of "Art for Art," and he never conveyed

it with more incisive brilliance than in the sketch of Bordello's

"opposite," the Troubadour Eglamor.

"How he loved that art!

The calling marking him a man apart

From men--one not to care, take counsel for

Cold hearts, comfortless faces, ... since verse, the gift

Was his, and men, the whole of them, must shift

Without it."

To Eglamor his art is a mysterious ritual, of which he is the sacrosanct

priest, and his happy rhyme the divine response vouchsafed to him in

answer. Such beauty as he produces is no effluence from a soul mating

itself, like Wordsworth's, "in love and holy passion with the universe,"

but a cunning application of the approved recipes for effective writing

current in the literary guild;--

"He, no genius rare,

Transfiguring in fire or wave or air

At will, but a poor gnome that, cloistered up

In some rock-chamber, with his agate-cup,

His topaz-rod, his seed-pearl, in these few

And their arrangement finds enough to do

For his best art."[13]

[Footnote 13: Works, i. 131.]

From these mysticisms and technicalities of Troubadour and all other

poetic guilds Browning decisively detaches his poet. Sordello is not a

votary of poetry; he does not "cultivate the Muse"; he does not even

prostrate himself before the beauty and wonder of the visible universe.

Poetry is the atmosphere in which he lives; and in the beauty without he

recognises the "dream come true" of a soul which (like that of Pauline's

lover) "existence" thus "cannot satiate, cannot surprise." "Laugh thou

at envious fate," adorers cry to this inspired Platonist,

"Who, from earth's simplest combination ...

Dost soar to heaven's complexest essence, rife

With grandeurs, unaffronted to the last,

Equal to being all."[14]

[Footnote 14: Works, i. 122.]

And, in truth, his power of imaginative apprehension has no bounds. From

the naïve self-reflection of his boyish dreams he passes on to visions

which embrace a continually fuller measure of life, until he forestalls

the sublime Dantesque conception of a poetry vast and deep as humanity,

where every soul will stand forth revealed in its naked truth. But he

cannot, like Dante, put his vast conceptions into the shackles of

intelligible speech. His uncompromising "infinity" will not comply with

finite conditions, and he remains an inefficient and inarticulate

genius, a Hamlet of poetry.

In the second half of the poem the Hamlet of poetry becomes likewise a

Hamlet of politics. He aspires to serve the people otherwise than by

holding up to them the mirror of an all-revealing poetry. Though by

birth associated with the aristocratic and imperial Ghibellines, his

natural affinity is clearly with the Church, which in some sort stood

for the people against the nobles, and for spirit against brute force.

We see him, now, a frail, inspired Shelleyan[15] democrat, pleading the

Guelph cause before the great Ghibelline soldier Salinguerra,--as he had

once pitted the young might of native song against the accomplished

Troubadour Eglamor. Salinguerra is the foil of the political, as Eglamor

of the literary, Sordello, and the dramatic interest of the whole poem

focusses in those two scenes. He had enough of the lonely inspiration of

genius to vanquish the craftsman, but too little of its large humanity

to cope with the astute man of the world. When Salinguerra, naturally

declining his naïve entreaty that he should put his Ghibelline sword at

the service of the Guelph, offers Sordello, on his part, the command of

the imperial forces in Italy if he will remain true to the Ghibelline

cause, he makes this finite world more alluring than it had ever been

before to the "infinite" Sordello. After a long struggle, he renounces

the offer, and--dies, exhausted with the strain of choice.

[Footnote 15: There are other Shelleyan traits in _Sordello_--e.g., the

young witch image (as in _Pauline_) at the opening of the second book.]

What was Browning's judgment upon Sordello? Does he regard him as an

idealist of aims too lofty for success in this world, and whose

"failure" implied his triumph in another, where his "broken arc" would

become the "perfect round"? Assuredly not. That might indeed be his

destiny, but Browning makes it perfectly clear that he failed, not

because his ideal was incommensurate with the conditions in which he

lived, but because he lacked the supreme gift by which the greatest of

souls may find their function and create their sphere in the least

promising _milieu_,--a controlling and guiding passion of love. With

compassionate tenderness, as of a father to his wayward child, Browning

in the closing pages of the poem lays his finger on the ailing place.

"Ah, my Sordello, I this once befriend and speak for you." It was true

enough, in the past, that Soul, as belonging to Eternity, must needs

prove incomplete for Time. But is life to be therefore only a struggle

to escape from the shackles of the body? Is freedom only won by death?

No, rejoins the poet, and the reply comes from the heart of his poetry,

though at issue with much of his explicit doctrine; a harmony of soul

and body is possible here in which both fulfil their functions:

"Like yonder breadth of watery heaven, a bay,

And that sky-space of water, ray for ray

And star for star, one richness where they mixed,"

the Soul seeing its way in Time without being either dazzled by, or

losing, its vision of Eternity, having the saving clue of Love. Dante,

for whom Love was the pervading spirit of the universe, and the

beginning and end of his inspiration, wrought his vision of eternal

truth and his experience of the passing lives of men into such a harmony

with unexampled power; and the comparison, implicit in every page of

_Sordello_, is driven home with almost scornful bitterness on the

last:--

"What he should have been,

Could be, and was not--the one step too mean

For him to take--we suffer at this day

Because of: Ecelin had pushed away

Its chance ere Dante could arrive and take

That step Sordello spurned, for the world's sake.

... A sorry farce

Such life is, after all!"

The publication of _Sordello_ in 1840 closes the first phase of

Browning's literary career. By the great majority of those who had

hailed the splendid promise of _Paracelsus_, the author of _Sordello_

was frankly given up. Surprisingly few thought it worth while to wrestle

with the difficult book. It was the day of the gentle literary public

which had a few years before recoiled from _Sartor Resartus_, and which

found in the difficulty of a book the strongest presumption against it.

A later generation, leavened by Carlyle, came near to regarding

difficulty as a presumption in its favour, and this more strenuous and

athletic attitude towards literature was among the favouring conditions

which brought Browning at length into vogue.

Robert Browning(#14618) · 第 2 / 9 章