EPILOGOMENA TO LETTER III.

As the above letter was handed to my personal friends for the purpose of

conveying the desired intelligence, and sent to me, when the report of

my illness and mental derangement was found to be groundless and false,

there can be no impropriety or breach of courtesy or justice in its

publication. The serious consequences to which it gave rise, the

deprivation of my liberty for six entire months, and the suspension of

my functions as an academic instructor (though not of my activity as an

author, which under the most inauspicious circumstances was still

continued) alike demand, that it should be made known in connection with

my own communications before and during my imprisonment. A comment or

two will exhibit the contents of the Doctor's epistle in their proper

light.

1st, The Dr's. letter is itself a contradiction and an egregious symptom

of insanity on his part, which is, moreover, confirmed by his previous

conduct from his first entrance into the institution. In comparing the

University with the Lunatic Asylum, I find that the former during the

winter of 1852-'53 (I may add, ever since my return from Europe in 1850)

was a far more disorderly and irrational place than the latter, where

the occasional confusion or the perpetual (sane and insane) perversity

of men is the lamentable, but natural and necessary (consequently

_irresponsible_) result, of an internal physical or intellectual

disorder or defect, which is moreover susceptible of classification and

of a psychological exposition, while in the former it was "got up" for

the particular purpose of subjugation or of expulsion, and where

consequently it was the result of _responsible_ perversity and malice,

_susceptible of moral reprobation_.

2d, The allegation of my being "unfitted for the business of teaching,"

and of the propriety of finding me "another institution, adapted to

such, away from study," is an absurd and a libelous perversion of the

truth, which it is scarcely worth while to refute. From the year 1839,

the year of my matriculation at the institution, to the present hour I

have had no other profession, except that of having appeared in the

additional capacity of an author. Even during my undergraduate career I

taught successfully the various disciplines of our academic course, with

the approbation and to the satisfaction of the Faculty, members of which

examined and admitted to promotion several of my private scholars, who

had been expressly referred to me for tuition in the Classics, in

Mathematics, in Philosophy, &c.--Of my courses of instruction since my

official and regular connection with the institution (which dates from

the year 1846) in the language and in the literature which I was more

especially appointed to profess, it is not necessary to speak here, the

University itself having offered but little inducement and no emolument

or honor to the cultivation of the modern languages. In all the

professional services, however, which I have had occasion to render to

the institution of late years, my qualifications and my efficiency could

never have been honestly or honorably questioned. I have prepared my own

text-books, which have found their way into most of the literary and

educational institutions of this continent to some extent into Europe

even. One of them was begun at the very time, when "the indications of a

disordered mind had become more decided," and was completed with

scarcely a day's intermission of my work at the lunatic asylum, where I

subsequently improved my leisure (as far as my shattered health would

permit) by zealously engaging in some preliminary studies for a history

of modern literature.--It is equally needless to expatiate on my

extensive acquaintance, direct and indirect, with academic men and

methods both in the United States and in Europe, where within a few

years past I spent an entire year in the pursuit of literary and

philosophical studies at two of its most prominent Universities.--_To my

morality, both private and social, and to my religion, no one but a

hyper-puristic religionist or a calvinistic tyrant could possibly

object._--The real objection, and the cause of my being unfitted for the

business of instruction must therefore be looked for elsewhere. From

various indications and from several catastrophes in my personal

history, brought about by sectarian jealousy and fanatical intrigue,

from certain significant changes in the faculty of the institution, and

from innumerable efforts to subject me to a creed, or to the social

control of certain religious parties, I should infer that it manifestly

and palpably resided in a mistrust of what is vulgarly termed "the

soundness of my views" on certain questions, never discussed in

respectable literary institutions, and beyond their jurisdiction, or in

other words _in a suspicion of heresy_.--I claim, however, in opposition

to all these pretensions, which I deem an absurdity, my right (which is

_inalienable_ and _imprescriptible_) to my moral and intellectual

culture, commenced under the auspices and fostering care of my Alma

Mater herself (during a former administration) and continued and

perfected by years of serious and earnest effort in America and Europe,

since. _I recognize no sectarian guidance or control whatever in any of

the independent sciences, cultivated from time immemorial at academic

institutions, much less in the science of sciences, the very law and

indispensable condition of which is absolute freedom from all external

authority or restraint._ The law of intellectual freedom, of which the

Reader will find a short exposition in the concluding document of this

pamphlet (which I have extracted and translated from a distinguished

authority on the "Philosophy of Right") is recognized by the spirit and

the letter of the Constitution and by the political and social history

of the United States, by the Revised Statutes of the State of New-York,

by all the leading universities _of Protestant and Catholic Europe_, and

by a number of similar institutions in America, among which stands,

"professedly" at least, the University of the city of New-York. The

attempts of certain parties in connection with the institution and _ab

extra_ to "smother" (to use one of their own cant words) and to crush my

independence by gravely endeavoring to _coerce me into an alliance with

a questionable religionism, which is abhorrent to my ideas, my

habits and my sentiments, and by fomenting internal disorders for the

purpose of effecting an exclusion_, are an unconstitutional, an unjust,

an iniquitous invasion of my most sacred rights as a man, an American

citizen, a scholar and a professor. I repel, therefore, Dr. Ferris'

insinuation as a maliciously astute and as a false one, which of itself

declares the Dr. _incompetent to decide upon the merits of a real

scholar, and utterly unfit for the important trust of presiding over

the interests of any other but a sectarian institution of the narrowest

description, of the most painfully exclusive moral perversity_.

To this I may add, that in consideration of the many and various

disciplines, earnestly and steadily cultivated by me for several years

past, such as intellectual philosophy, the learned and modern

languages, linguistics and the history of literature generally, I could

in academic justice _demand the right_ to instruct in any one of the

departments for which I was fitted. That such a right exists, and that

it is applicable to my case, the reader may learn from Sir William

Hamilton's Essays on University Education, recently republished in

America, to which I refer _passim_. I can therefore confidently

challenge not only the chancellor, but, in case of a concurrence in his

sentiments, the entire faculty of the University to the following

proposition:--In case my capacity to teach or lecture academically is

questioned, I propose to take, and I demand one of the following

chairs; _where under suitable auspices and with proper and regular

provisions for the maintenance of order, I could at once begin_:--1st,

The Latin language and literature.--2d, the Greek ditto, ditto.--3d,

Moral and intellectual philosophy, either systematically or

historically.--4th, History or the general history of literature (of

which I have at present a text-book in preparation).--5th, Linguistics

or the classification of languages, including general grammar.--6th,

the history of modern (European) languages and literatures.--7th, the

elements of the Sanscrit, of which I still have a Mss. grammar,

compiled by myself for my private use, during the winter of 1851.--I

omit mentioning the remaining academic disciplines, for which I have no

particular taste, but which I still could teach, and for which I could

prepare the text-books, if it were necessary to do so.

3d, The alleged indications of insanity were _utterly unfounded_ at the

time they were made. I had recovered my usual health and spirits

immediately after the commencement of last year, about the beginning of

July '53, when those who had flagrantly disturbed the quiet of my

residence in and about the University building had vanished into the

country. Of the winter of 1852-'53 I only recollect, that subsequently

to the dismissal of my class, which I could not in honor consent to hear

any longer, I made a fruitless attempt to continue my private studies,

and to finish a commentary on a Greek drama which I had begun at the

commencement of the term, and that the ominous symptoms of _external

insanity_ about me soon increased to such an alarming extent, that I was

forced to lay aside my pen, unable to endure the outrage and annoyance

any longer; that gangs of scandalous ruffians in the shape of boys,

girls, men and women, many of whom I knew by their voices, kept up at

certain intervals, by day and by night, a nefarious system of

mystification and of nuisance from January to the end of June, in the

council-room of the institution, in the hall, before my door, in front

of my window, and on the parade ground; that in consequence of all this

my rest at night was completely broken, until I could only sleep by day;

that after a while I was confined to my bed most of the time, and that I

frequently did not rise for breakfast till 6 o'clock, P. M.; that it was

painful and disgusting for me to be awake, and that all I read for

several successive months was "Hegel's Logic" for two or three hours a

day, and that for some time I only eat once a day. In May, I think, I

fled to a neighboring State and University, partly with the intention of

changing my place of residence.--As a psychologist I was well aware,

that sleep was a sovereign preventive, as well as a remedy for all the

disorders of the mind, especially for those which might arise from

external causes such as those I have just described; I therefore

anticipated and _prevented_ the unhappy consequences which the Dr. seems

to have expected from the outrageous nuisance of his cherished

institution, where such scenes of scandal only _date from the time his

prospective and his actual entrance on the duties of his office_, and

really seem to have been made to order, I know not for whose benefit

(certainly not for mine). _During the summer I was_, in consequence of

the happy reaction and repose, _unusually gay and regular in my work_. I

then wrote an introduction to Schiller's Maid of Orleans, another one to

Goethe's Iphigenia, and a third to Tieck's Puss in Boots, all of which

have since been published in my new Manual of German Literature. I deny,

therefore, having ever given any symptoms of insanity whatsoever at any

time of the year, while I admit that a renewal of the scandal (which the

parties concerned have endeavored to revive since my release this

spring, but which I checked by a speedy notice to the police court and

to some of my friends), in the autumn might have led to such calamitous

results. Neither my Kant, nor my Rauch, nor my Hegel, nor any other

philosopher or psychologist could for one moment be induced to admit,

_that the presence of external causes and tendencies to intellectual

derangement were necessarily attended or followed by the malady itself_.

This would be an egregious logical fallacy, to which no intelligent

physician in or out of the Lunatic Asylum could for one moment

subscribe, without justly incurring the risk of being charged with an

inexcusable lack of professional knowledge and experience or what is

still worse, with a criminal connivance at an unjust and inquitous

conspiracy against the reputation and the life of an American citizen.

To the charge of the folly of suffering so long and so severely from so

gross a system of disorder which might have speedily been checked by the

extra-academic authorities of the city, I can only reply, that the

confusion and the consequent embarrassment was so great, that it was

impossible for me at the time to come to any decision as to the course

to be pursued. The most advisable policy would have been, to have left

entirely, and to have directed the correction or the punishment from a

distance. The following letters, written from the Lunatic Asylum

(_between which and the University there was a manifest internal

harmony, and which was evidently commissioned to complete the work of

humiliation and of subjugation_), may serve to elucidate the facts of

the case with some additional particulars.

To the above mentioned causes of the ruin of my health, I may add, that

during the same winter I had an opportunity of witnessing a resurrection

of "Salem Witchcraft," practiced on me by a certain lady, a mother in

Israel of this city, who was manifestly in connection with the

ultra-calvinistic faction of the University, which is the one to which

Dr. Ferris is indebted for his elevation. I moreover discovered in the

same connection, one of the two sources, from which the low insults in

the street, at certain well-known hours of my walks, in certain places

and directions, (to which I made allusion in my letter to the mayor of

the city,) had emanated, and I received some additional light on certain

events of my personal history, to which I allude in letter No. 5.--A

father in Israel, a gray-headed sinner in my opinion, likewise informed

me _that they had the Irish to defend them_.--I venture to assert that

few of my countrymen, except perhaps the lowest rabble, would ever lend

their aid to such nefarious purposes.

From all that I have had occasion to observe of social disorder and

discontent in the city for several years past, I am sure that there are

men who foment intestine commotions, who shamelessly and openly conspire

against the honor and the interests, if not against the property and

lives of their fellow-citizens, and whom the State ought to prosecute

and punish as offenders against a clearly defined law of the

statute-book.

My sanity at the time of arrest I can establish:--1st, By the testimony

of those who saw me daily, and more especially, by that of a young man,

who came to see me frequently, after the reception of Dr. Ferris'

letter, and who in fact brought it from the office. 2dly, By the

testimony of a distinguished physician, who about a week before, dressed

a slight wound on one of my eye-brows, received from a fall against my

sofa in the dark. 3dly, By the fact, that I was quietly and constantly

engaged in writing, and in daily communication with the printer, who

stereotyped my "Hand-book of German Literature." _Symptoms of unusual

excitement, in consequence of such an outrage, are no proof of

derangement._

Letters of a Lunatic A Brief Exposition of My University Life, During the Years 1853-54 · 第 12 / 16 题