The _Newburyport Herald_ said:--

“Charles Sumner’s speech will be found on our first page

to-day. We give it not by way of approval, for it seems to

us the worst speech that could be made. Its only influence

will be to distract and divide the North, and raise up a

faction here against the Administration, which has declared

for an entirely different policy,--while at the South it

will kill what little Union sentiment remains, and rejoice

the Rebel hosts, giving them better ammunition for their

treason than powder would be.… We don’t know how it appears

to others, but it seems to us, that, if Jeff Davis had

liberty to send his own agent here to do the worst for us,

he could have done nothing more. The war can be fought upon

no such grounds; and before it closes, we shall discover

that fact.”

The New York _Journal of Commerce_ was quite sententious.

“The Republicans of Boston desire to be rid of any

connection with the fanatic Senator’s remarks. The signs of

the times improve.”

The _Carbon Democrat_, of Pennsylvania, breaks forth in

condemnation.

“If there were any lack of evidence to prove that Charles

Sumner is really an enemy to our country, and desired only

to destroy it, and immerse the people in the dreadful,

crashing slavery of martial tyranny, this speech supplies

the link, and makes the train of evidence against his

fealty strong as Holy Writ. He here unblushingly proclaims

the horrid policy of unloosing the bonds of four million

slaves, and setting them against the Caucasian race,--to

murder, pillage, and destroy, without stint, until their

barbarous appetites may be appeased.…

“In this connection we might suggest that Marius was a

very proper example for Senator Sumner and his school of

politicians to quote. Like them, he was the very prince of

office-seekers.…

“He advocates a doctrine which is in direct violation of

the spirit of the Constitution, and which tends only to

weaken the hands of the Government, by dividing public

sentiment at the North, and thus discouraging enlistments.

Why is it that the Government, thus assailed, does not lay

its hand upon this fulminator of treason, and secure him

safely behind the bars and bolts of Fort Lafayette?”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 07 (of 20) · 第 99 / 136 题