DR. ELRINGTON'S EDITIONS OF USSHER'S WORKS.

(Vol. iii., p. 496.)

In reply to your correspondent C. PAINE, JUN. I beg to say that this

University has recently requested me to undertake the completion of

Ussher's works. Dr. Elrington has left about half the fourteenth volume

printed off: but I have found considerable difficulty in ascertaining

what he intended to print, or what ought to be printed, in the remaining

half. The printed portion contains the archbishop's Theological

Lectures, in reply to Bellarmine, never before published.[2] I have

found amongst Dr. Elrington's papers a volume of sermons (a MS. of the

latter half of the seventeenth century), which are attributed, in the

MS. itself, to Ussher; but the authenticity of these sermons is, it

appears to me, very doubtful. I therefore hesitate to print them.

[Footnote 2: Elrington's Life of _Ussher_, p. 26.]

I am anxious to find a treatise on the Seventy Weeks, by Ussher, which I

have some reason to think once existed in MS. This tract, with another

on the question of the Millennium, from Rev. xx. 4., formed the

exercises which he performed for the degree of D.D., at the commencement

of the University in 1612: and I remember Dr. Elrington telling me (if I

did not mistake his meaning), that he intended to print them in the

fourteenth volume. My difficulty is, that I cannot find them amongst

Ussher's MSS., and I do not know where they are to be had. Some

imperfect fragments on the Seventy Weeks are preserved in MS. in Trinity

College Library, in Ussher's autograph; but they are far too crude and

unfinished for publication.

The _Bibliotheca Theologica_, a work on the same plan as Cave's

_Scriptores Ecclesiastici_, exists in MS. in the Bodleian Library, and a

copy from the Bodleian MS. is in Dublin. This work has not been included

in Dr. Elrington's edition; and I remember his discussing the subject

with me, and deciding not to print it. His reasons were these:--1. It is

an unfinished work, which the archbishop did not live to complete. 2. It

is full of errors, which our present increased materials and knowledge

of the subject would easily enable us to correct; but the correction of

them would swell the work to a considerable extent. 3. The work was

used, and is frequently quoted by Cave, who seems to have published the

most valuable parts of it. Its publication, therefore, would not add

anything to our knowledge, whilst it would probably detract, however

unfairly, from the archbishop's reputation: for the public seldom make

allowances for an unfinished work. 4. It would probably make _three_, if

not _four_ volumes; and Dr. Elrington did not think its publication of

sufficient importance to warrant so great an addition to the cost and

bulk of the Works.

The _System of Theology_ having been disclaimed by Ussher himself

(although it is quoted as his by the Committee of the Privy Council in

their decision of the "Gorham Case"), has not been included by Dr.

Elrington in the collection of Ussher's works.

I shall be much obliged to MR. PAYNE, or to any other of your

correspondents, if he will give me any information respecting the

treatises on the Seventy Weeks and on the Millennium, or any other

advice which may assist me in the completion of the fourteenth volume.

I may add, that it is my intention, with the able assistance of my

learned friend Dr. Reeves, of Ballymena, to print a complete index to

Ussher's Works, which will be compiled by Dr. Reeves, and is now in

active preparation. The references to the more important works, such as

the _Primordia_, and _Annals_, will be so contrived as to be applicable

to the old editions, as well as to Dr. Elrington's edition. This Index

will form the seventeenth volume of the Works.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 88, July 5, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 63 / 112 题