VIII

There are some painters whose work we may personally wholly

dislike--dislike their outlook--even our favourite subjects becoming

intolerable to us in their art. It is something in their nature

antipathetic to our own. Of course, mediocre work does not assume such

proportions in our mind. Then there are painters who, through some

affinity of temperament with our own, make everything their art touches

pleasant to us. And then there are the impersonal artists, Velazquez,

Millais, and Sargent, taking apparently quite an impersonal view of

life. Sargent's world is everybody's world, and if we are affected one

way or another by it, it is as life affects us.

One has heard a painter say, "I can paint those things because I love

them." Judged by his treatment of so many things, of nearly everything,

how much must Sargent love life. One man can paint flowers and another

marble--Sargent paints everything; and, to paraphrase, almost it might

be said that what he doesn't paint isn't worth painting. But all this is

nothing if he never penetrates, as Meissonier and others never

penetrated, below the surface; if he gave no symbols in his art of

things invisible.

[Illustration: PLATE VII.--THE MISSES WERTHEIMER

(In the collection of Asher Wertheimer, Esq.)

Portraits of the daughters of Asher Wertheimer, Esq., the

eminent art-expert. Mr. Wertheimer is himself the subject of one

of the best of Sargent's portraits.]

We like some of the subjects he has painted, others we dislike so much

that we wonder he has painted them; just as in life there are people and

surroundings to which we are attracted, and others from whom we keep

away.

To the realist by temperament the effect of the details of any scene

accepted direct from nature provide exciting inspiration, and he least

of all is likely to turn to decorative composition, which, with its

resemblance to a form imposed in verse, only aids in the interpretation

of the subject in proportion as it is imaginatively inspired. A painter

pre-occupied with the opportunities which any incident may offer for the

interpretation of subtleties, will often accept any scene from nature

and almost any point of view as composition. For the old formulas of

composition--of the time when composition was regarded as something to

be taught--went with a decorative conception of things, was in itself a

form of decoration. And whilst it has been said that all art is

decorative, it will perhaps be found that the naturalistic painter is

too much excited with incident to scheme much for a rhythmic

presentation of it in the frame. Such a canvas as Sargent's "Salmon

Fishing in Norway," lately exhibited in the McCulloch collection, a

portrait painted in the open, of a youth resting on the bank of a river

with caught salmon and tackle beside him, the centre of a skilfully

painted piece of landscape, is a case in point. The difficulties which

subjects have presented have often seemed Sargent's inspiration in

landscape: rocks presenting surfaces to the light with a thousand

variations; the wet basins of bronze fountains receiving coloured

reflections and the diamond lights in the fountain splashes; grey

architecture with its soft shadows, architecture white in the sun with

its cool blue shadows, like fragments of night in the doorways. It is

this mysterious sensation of light and shadow alternating everywhere,

changing the colour of the day itself as the day advances, which Sargent

meets. He is one of the few painters who have faced the noon. He has

this great command of art's slender resources, and he is matter-of-fact

enough to be happy at this uncompromising time of day, unbelieved in by

the workers, so inconsiderate to the lazy with its heat. The noon has

not many with its praises, and "all great art is praise." Painters have

got up at dawn to communicate to us its everyday recurring freshness, as

of an eternal spring, and has not evening always been the painter's

hour? Sargent has faced the noon, which demands so much sensitiveness

that the over-sensitive shrink. His brush has given it in water-colours

the finest interpretation it has yet received.

Sargent · 第 12 / 15 题