In neighborly association with the brown thrush is the towhee bunting,

or chewink. The two choose the same places for their summer homes, and,

unless I am deceived, they often migrate in company. But though they are

so much together, and in certain of their ways very much alike, their

habits of mind are widely dissimilar. The towhee is of a peculiarly even

disposition. I have seldom heard him scold, or use any note less

good-natured and musical than his pleasant _cherawink_. I have never

detected him in a quarrel such as nearly all birds are once in a while

guilty of, ungracious as it may seem to mention the fact; nor have I

ever seen him hopping nervously about and twitching his tail, as is the

manner of most species, when, for instance, their nests are approached.

Nothing seems to annoy him. At the same time, he is not full of

continual merriment like the chickadee, nor occasionally in a rapture

like the goldfinch. Life with him is pitched in a low key; comfortable

rather than cheerful, and never jubilant. And yet, for all the towhee's

careless demeanor, you soon begin to suspect him of being deep. He

appears not to mind you; he keeps on scratching among the dry leaves as

if he had no thought of being driven away by your presence; but in a

minute or two you look that way again, and he is not there. If you pass

near his nest, he makes not a tenth part of the ado which a brown thrush

would make in the same circumstances, but (partly for this reason) you

will find half a dozen nests of the thrush sooner than one of his. With

all his simplicity and frankness, which puts him in happy contrast with

the thrush, he knows as well as anybody how to keep his own counsel. I

have seen him with his mate for two or three days together about the

flower-beds in the Boston Public Garden, and so far as appeared they

were feeding as unconcernedly as though they had been on their own

native heath, amid the scrub-oaks and huckleberry bushes; but after

their departure it was remembered that they had not once been heard to

utter a sound. If self-possession be four fifths of good manners, our

red-eyed Pipilo may certainly pass for a gentleman.

We have now named four birds, the chickadee, the goldfinch, the brown

thrush, and the towhee,--birds so diverse in plumage that no eye could

fail to discriminate them at a glance. But the four differ no more truly

in bodily shape and dress than they do in that inscrutable something

which we call temperament, disposition. If the soul of each were

separated from the body and made to stand out in sight, those of us who

have really known the birds in the flesh would have no difficulty in

saying, This is the titmouse, and this the towhee. It would be with them

as we hope it will be with our friends in the next world, whom we shall

recognize there because we knew them here; that is, we knew _them_, and

not merely the bodies they lived in. This kind of familiarity with birds

has no necessary connection with ornithology. Personal intimacy and a

knowledge of anatomy are still two different things. As we have all

heard, ours is an age of science; but, thank fortune, matters have not

yet gone so far that a man must take a course in anthropology before he

can love his neighbor.

It is a truth only too patent that taste and conscience are sometimes at

odds. One man wears his faults so gracefully that we can hardly help

falling in love with them, while another, alas, makes even virtue itself

repulsive. I am moved to this commonplace reflection by thinking of the

blue jay, a bird of doubtful character, but one for whom, nevertheless,

it is impossible not to feel a sort of affection and even of respect. He

is quite as suspicious as the brown thrush, and his instinct for an

invisible perch is perhaps as unerring as the cuckoo's; and yet, even

when he takes to hiding, his manner is not without a dash of boldness.

He has a most irascible temper, also, but, unlike the thrasher, he does

not allow his ill-humor to degenerate into chronic sulkiness. Instead,

he flies into a furious passion, and is done with it. Some say that on

such occasions he swears, and I have myself seen him when it was plain

that nothing except a natural impossibility kept him from tearing his

hair. His larynx would make him a singer, and his mental capacity is far

above the average; but he has perverted his gifts, till his music is

nothing but noise and his talent nothing but smartness. A like process

of depravation the world has before now witnessed in political life,

when a man of brilliant natural endowments has yielded to low ambitions

and stooped to unworthy means, till what was meant to be a statesman

turns put to be a demagogue. But perhaps we wrong our handsome friend,

fallen angel though he be, to speak thus of him. Most likely he would

resent the comparison, and I do not press it. We must admit that

juvenile sportsmen have persecuted him unduly; and when a creature

cannot show himself without being shot at, he may be pardoned for a

little misanthropy. Christians as we are, how many of us could stand

such a test? In these circumstances, it is a point in the jay's favor

that he still has, what is rare with birds, a sense of humor, albeit it

is humor of a rather grim sort,--the sort which expends itself in

practical jokes and uncivil epithets. He has discovered the school-boy's

secret: that for the expression of unadulterated derision there is

nothing like the short sound of _a_, prolonged into a drawl. _Yah_,

_yah_, he cries; and sometimes, as you enter the woods, you may hear

him shouting so as to be heard for half a mile, "Here comes a fool with

a gun; look out for him!"

It is natural to think of the shrike in connection with the jay, but the

two have points of unlikeness no less than of resemblance. The shrike

is a taciturn bird. If he were a politician, he would rely chiefly on

what is known as the "still hunt," although he too can scream loudly

enough on occasion. His most salient trait is his impudence, but even

that is of a negative type. "Who are you," he says, "that I should be at

the trouble to insult you?" He has made a study of the value of silence

as an indication of contempt, and is almost human in his ability to

stare straight by a person whose presence it suits him to ignore. His

imperturbability is wonderful. Watch him as closely as you please, you

will never discover what he is thinking about. Undertake, for instance,

now that the fellow is singing from the top of a small tree only a few

rods from where you are standing,--undertake to settle the long dispute

whether his notes are designed to decoy small birds within his reach.

Those whistles and twitters,--hear them! So miscellaneous! so different

from anything which would be expected from a bird of his size and

general disposition! so very like the notes of sparrows! They must be

imitative. You begin to feel quite sure of it. But just at this point

the sounds cease, and you look up to discover that Collurio has fallen

to preening his feathers in the most listless manner imaginable. "Look

at me," he says; "do I act like one on the watch for his prey? Indeed,

sir, I wish the innocent sparrows no harm; and besides, if you must know

it, I ate an excellent game-breakfast two hours ago, while laggards like

you were still abed." In the winter, which is the only season when I

have been able to observe him, the shrike is to the last degree

unsocial, and I have known him to stay for a month in one spot all by

himself, spending a good part of every day perched upon a telegraph

wire. He ought not to be very happy, with such a disposition, one would

think; but he seems to be well contented, and sometimes his spirits are

fairly exuberant. Perhaps, as the phrase is, he enjoys _himself_; in

which case he certainly has the advantage of most of us,--unless,

indeed, we are easily pleased. At any rate, he is philosopher enough to

appreciate the value of having few wants; and I am not sure but that he

anticipated the vaunted discovery of Teufelsdröckh, that the fraction of

life may be increased by lessening the denominator. But even the stoical

shrike is not without his epicurean weakness. When he has killed a

sparrow, he eats the brains first; after that, if he is still hungry, he

devours the coarser and less savory parts. In this, however, he only

shares the well-nigh universal inconsistency. There are never many

thorough-going stoics in the world. Epictetus declared with an oath

that he should be glad to see _one_.[7] To take everything as equally

good, to know no difference between bitter and sweet, penury and plenty,

slander and praise,--this is a great attainment, a Nirvana to which few

can hope to arrive. Some wise man has said (and the remark has more

meaning than may at once appear) that dying is usually one of the last

things which men do in this world.

Against the foil of the butcher-bird's stolidity we may set the

inquisitive, garrulous temperament of the white-eyed vireo and the

yellow-breasted chat. The vireo is hardly larger than the goldfinch, but

let him be in one of his conversational moods, and he will fill a smilax

thicket with noise enough for two or three cat-birds. Meanwhile he keeps

his eye upon you, and seems to be inviting your attention to his

loquacious abilities. The chat is perhaps even more voluble. _Staccato_

whistles and snarls follow each other at most extraordinary intervals of

pitch, and the attempt at showing off is sometimes unmistakable.

Occasionally he takes to the air, and flies from one tree to another;

teetering his body and jerking his tail, in an indescribable fashion,

and chattering all the while. His "inner consciousness" at such a moment

would be worth perusing. Possibly he has some feeling for the grotesque.

But I suspect not; probably what we laugh at as the antics of a clown is

all sober earnest to him.

At best, it is very little we can know about what is passing in a bird's

mind. We label him with two or three _sesquipedalia verba_, give his

territorial range, describe his notes and his habits of nidification,

and fancy we have rendered an account of the bird. But how should we

like to be inventoried in such a style? "His name was John Smith; he

lived in Boston, in a three-story brick house; he had a baritone voice,

but was not a good singer." All true enough; but do you call that a

man's biography?

The four birds last spoken of are all wanting in refinement. The jay and

the shrike are wild and rough, not to say barbarous, while the

white-eyed vireo and the chat have the character which commonly goes by

the name of oddity. All four are interesting for their strong

individuality and their picturesqueness, but it is a pleasure to turn

from them to creatures like our four common New England _Hylocichlæ_, or

small thrushes. These are the real patricians. With their modest but

rich dress, and their dignified, quiet demeanor, they stand for the

true aristocratic spirit. Like all genuine aristocrats, they carry an

air of distinction, of which no one who approaches them can long remain

unconscious. When you go into their haunts they do not appear so much

frightened as offended. "Why do you intrude?" they seem to say; "these

are our woods;" and they bow you out with all ceremony. Their songs are

in keeping with this character; leisurely, unambitious, and brief, but

in beauty of voice and in high musical quality excelling all other music

of the woods. However, I would not exaggerate, and I have not found even

these thrushes perfect. The hermit, who is my favorite of the four, has

a habit of slowly raising and depressing his tail when his mind is

disturbed--a trick of which it is likely he is unconscious, but which,

to say the least, is not a mark of good breeding; and the Wilson, while

every note of his song breathes of spirituality, has nevertheless a most

vulgar alarm call, a petulant, nasal, one-syllabled _yeork_. I do not

know anything so grave against the wood thrush or the Swainson; although

when I have fooled the former with decoy whistles, I have found him more

inquisitive than seemed altogether becoming to a bird of his quality.

But character without flaw is hardly to be insisted on by sons of Adam,

and, after all deductions are made, the claim of the _Hylocichlæ_ to

noble blood can never be seriously disputed. I have spoken of the four

together, but each is clearly distinguished from all the others; and

this I believe to be as true of mental traits as it is of details of

plumage and song. No doubt, in general, they are much alike; we may say

that they have the same qualities; but a close acquaintance will reveal

that the qualities have been mixed in different proportions, so that the

total result in each case is a personality strictly unique.

And what is true of the _Hylocichlæ_ is true of every bird that flies.

Anatomy and dress and even voice aside, who does not feel the

dissimilarity between the cat-bird and the robin, and still more the

difference, amounting to contrast, between the cat-bird and the

bluebird? Distinctions of color and form are what first strike the eye,

but on better acquaintance these are felt to be superficial and

comparatively unimportant; _the_ difference is not one of outside

appearance. It is his gentle, high-bred manner and not his azure

coat, which makes the bluebird; and the cat-bird would be a cat-bird

in no matter what garb, so long as he retained his obtrusive

self-consciousness and his prying, busy-body spirit; all of which, being

interpreted, comes, it may be, to no more than this, "Fine feathers

don't make fine birds."

Even in families containing many closely allied species, I believe that

every species has its own proper character, which sufficient intercourse

would enable us to make a due report of. Nobody ever saw a song-sparrow

manifesting the spirit of a chipper, and I trust it will not be in my

day that any of our American sparrows are found emulating the virtues of

their obstreperous immigrant cousin. Of course it is true of birds, as

of men, that some have much more individuality than others. But know any

bird or any man well enough, and he will prove to be himself, and nobody

else. To know the ten thousand birds of the world well enough to see

how, in bodily structure, habit of life, and mental characteristics,

every one is different from every other is the long and delightful task

which is set before the ornithologist.

But this is not all. The ornithology of the future must be ready to give

an answer to the further question how these divergences of anatomy and

temperament originated. How came the chickadee by his endless fund of

happy spirits? Whence did the towhee derive his equanimity, and the

brown thrush his saturnine temper? The waxwing and the vireo have the

same vocal organs; why should the first do nothing but whisper, while

the second is so loud and voluble? Why is one bird belligerent and

another peaceable; one barbarous and another civilized; one grave and

another gay? Who can tell? We can make here and there a plausible

conjecture. We know that the behavior of the blue jay varies greatly in

different parts of the country, in consequence of the different

treatment which he receives. We judge that the chickadee, from the

peculiarity of his feeding habits, is more certain than most birds are

of finding a meal whenever he is hungry; and that, we are assured from

experience, goes a long way toward making a body contented. We think it

likely that the brown thrush is at some special disadvantage in this

respect, or has some peculiar enemies warring upon him; in which case it

is no more than we might expect that he should be a pessimist. And, with

all our ignorance, we are yet sure that everything has a cause, and we

would fain hold by the brave word of Emerson, "Undoubtedly we have no

questions to ask which are unanswerable."

FOOTNOTES:

[7] This does not harmonize exactly with a statement which Emerson makes

somewhere, to the effect that all the stoics were stoics indeed. But

Epictetus had never lived in Concord.

IN THE WHITE MOUNTAINS

Our music's in the hills.

EMERSON.

IN THE WHITE MOUNTAINS.

It was early in June when I set out for my third visit to the White

Mountains, and the ticket-seller and the baggage-master in turn assured

me that the Crawford House, which I named as my destination, was not yet

open. They spoke, too, in the tone which men use when they mention

something which, but for uncommon stupidity, you would have known

beforehand. The kindly sarcasm missed its mark, however. I was aware

that the hotel was not yet ready for the "general public." But I said to

myself that, for once at least, I was not to be included in that

unfashionably promiscuous company. The vulgar crowd must wait, of

course. For the present the mountains, in reporters' language, were "on

private view;" and despite the ignorance of railway officials, I was one

of the elect. In plainer phrase, I had in my pocket a letter from the

manager of the famous inn before mentioned, in which he promised to do

what he could for my entertainment, even though he was not yet, as he

said, keeping a hotel.

Possibly I made too much of a small matter; but it pleased me to feel

that this visit of mine was to be of a peculiarly intimate

character,--almost, indeed, as if Mount Washington himself had bidden me

to private audience.

Compelled to wait three or four hours in North Conway, I improved the

opportunity to stroll once more down into the lovely Saco meadows, whose

"green felicity" was just now at its height. Here, perched upon a

fence-rail, in the shadow of an elm, I gazed at the snow-crowned Mount

Washington range, while the bobolinks and savanna sparrows made music on

every side. The song of the bobolinks dropped from above, and the

microphonic tune of the sparrows came up from the grass,--sky and earth

keeping holiday together. Almost I could have believed myself in Eden.

But, alas, even the birds themselves were long since shut out of that

garden of innocence, and as I started back toward the village a crow

went hurrying past me, with a kingbird in hot pursuit. The latter was

more fortunate than usual, or more plucky; actually alighting on the

crow's back and riding for some distance. I could not distinguish his

motions,--he was too far away for that,--but I wished him joy of his

victory, and grace to improve it to the full. For it is scandalous that

a bird of the crow's cloth should be a thief; and so, although I reckon

him among my friends,--in truth, _because_ I do so,--I am always able to

take it patiently when I see him chastised for his fault. Imperfect as

we all know each other to be, it is a comfort to feel that few of us are

so altogether bad as not to take more or less pleasure in seeing a

neighbor's character improved under a course of moderately painful

discipline.

At Bartlett word came that the passenger car would go no further, but

that a freight train would soon start, on which, if I chose, I could

continue my journey. Accordingly, I rode up through the Notch on a

platform car,--a mode of conveyance which I can heartily and in all good

conscience recommend. There is no crowd of exclaiming tourists, the

train of necessity moves slowly, and the open platform offers no

obstruction to the view. For a time I had a seat, which after a little

two strangers ventured to occupy with me; for "it's an ill wind that

blows nobody good," and there happened to be on the car one piece of

baggage,--a coffin, inclosed in a pine box. Our sitting upon it could

not harm either it or us; nor did we wean any disrespect to the man,

whoever he might be, whose body was to be buried in it. Judging the

dead charitably, as in duty bound, I had no doubt he would have been

glad if he could have seen his "narrow house" put to such a use. So we

made ourselves comfortable with it, until, at an invisible station, it

was taken off. Then we were obliged to stand, or to retreat into a

miserable small box-car behind us. The platform would lurch a little now

and then, and I, for one, was not experienced as a "train hand;" but we

all kept our places till the Frankenstein trestle was reached. Here,

where for five hundred feet we could look down upon the jagged rocks

eighty feet below us, one of the trio suddenly had an errand into the

box-car aforesaid, leaving the platform to the other stranger and me.

All in all, the ride through the Notch had never before been so

enjoyable, I thought; and late in the evening I found myself once again

at the Crawford House, and in one of the best rooms,--as well enough I

might be, being the only guest in the house.

The next morning, before it was really light, I was lying awake looking

at Mount Webster, while through the open window came the loud, cheery

song of the white-throated sparrows. The hospitable creatures seemed to

be inviting me to come at once into their woods; but I knew only too

well that, if the invitation were accepted, they would every one of

them take to hiding like bashful children.

The white-throat is one of the birds for whom I cherish a special

liking. On my first trip to the mountains I jumped off the train for a

moment at Bartlett, and had hardly touched the ground before I heard his

familiar call. Here, then, was Mr. Peabody at home. Season after season

he had camped near me in Massachusetts, and many a time I had been

gladdened by his lively serenade; now he greeted me from his own native

woods. So far as my observations have gone, he is common throughout the

mountain region; and that in spite of the standard guide-book, which

puts him down as patronizing the Glen House almost exclusively. He knows

the routes too well to need any guide, however, and may be excused for

his ignorance of the official programme. It is wonderful how shy he

is,--the more wonderful, because, during his migrations, his manner is

so very different. Then, even in a city park you may watch him at your

leisure, while his loud, clear whistle is often to be heard rising above

a din of horse-cars and heavy wagons. But here, in his summer quarters,

you will listen to his song a hundred times before you once catch a

glimpse of the singer. At first thought it seems strange that a bird

should be most at home when he is away from home; but in the one case

he has nothing but his own safety to consult, while in the other he is

thinking of those whose lives are more to him than his own, and whose

hiding-place he is every moment on the alert to conceal.

In Massachusetts we do not expect to find sparrows in deep woods. They

belong in fields and pastures, in roadside thickets, or by fence-rows

and old stone-walls bordered with barberry bushes and alders. But these

white-throats are children of the wilderness. It is one charm of their

music that it always comes, or seems to come, from such a

distance,--from far up the mountain-side, or from the inaccessible

depths of some ravine. I shall not soon forget its wild beauty as it

rose out of the spruce forests below me, while I was enjoying an evening

promenade, all by myself, over the long, flat summit of Moosilauke. From

his habit of singing late at night this sparrow is in some places known

as the nightingale. His more common name is the Peabody bird; while a

Jefferson man, who was driving me over the Cherry Mountain road, called

him the Peverly bird, and told me the following story:--

A farmer named Peverly was walking about his fields one spring morning,

trying to make up his mind whether the time had come to put in his

wheat. The question was important, and he was still in a deep quandary,

when a bird spoke up out of the wood and said, "Sow wheat, Peverly,

Peverly, Peverly!--Sow wheat, Peverly, Peverly, Peverly!" That settled

the matter. The wheat was sown, and in the fall a most abundant harvest

was gathered; and ever since then this little feathered oracle has been

known as the Peverly bird.

We have improved on the custom of the ancients: they examined a bird's

entrails; we listen to his song. Who says the Yankee is not wiser than

the Greek?

Birds in the Bush · 第 3 / 14 段