CHAPTER XV

FROM THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EMPIRE, 1804-1814

After the establishment of the empire, power became more arbitrary, and

society reconstructed itself on an aristocratic principle. The great

movement of recomposition, which had commenced on the 9th Thermidor went

on increasing. The convention had abolished classes; the directory

defeated parties; the consulate gained over men; and the empire corrupted

them by distinctions and privileges. This second period was the opposite

of the first. Under the one, we saw the government of the committees

exercised by men elected every three months, without guards, honours, or

representation, living on a few francs a day, working eighteen hours

together on common wooden tables; under the other, the government of the

empire, with all its paraphernalia of administration, it chamberlains,

gentlemen, praetorian guard, hereditary rights, its immense civil list,

and dazzling ostentation. The national activity was exclusively directed

to labour and war. All material interests, all ambitious passions, were

hierarchically arranged under one leader, who, after having sacrificed

liberty by establishing absolute power, destroyed equality by introducing

nobility.

The directory had erected all the surrounding states into republics;

Napoleon wished to constitute them on the model of the empire. He began

with Italy. The council of state of the Cisalpine republic determined on

restoring hereditary monarchy in favour of Napoleon. Its vice-president,

M. Melzi, came to Paris to communicate to him this decision. On the 26th

Ventôse, year XIII. (17th of March, 1805), he was received with great

solemnity at the Tuileries. Napoleon was on his throne, surrounded by his

court, and all the splendour of sovereign power, in the display of which

he delighted. M. Melzi offered him the crown, in the name of his fellow-

citizens. "Sire," said he, in conclusion, "deign to gratify the wishes of

the assembly over which I have the honour to preside. Interpreter of the

sentiments which animate every Italian heart, it brings you their sincere

homage. It will inform them with joy that by accepting, you have

strengthened the ties which attach you to the preservation, defence, and

prosperity of the Italian nation. Yes, sire, you wished the existence of

the Italian republic, and it existed. Desire the Italian monarchy to be

happy, and it will be so."

The emperor went to take possession of this kingdom; and, on the 26th of

May, 1805, he received at Milan the iron crown of the Lombards. He

appointed his adopted son, prince Eugene de Beauharnais, viceroy of Italy,

and repaired to Genoa, which also renounced its sovereignty. On the 4th of

June, 1805, its territory was united to the empire, and formed the three

departments of Genoa, Montenotte, and the Apennines. The small republic of

Lucca was included in this monarchical revolution. At the request of its

gonfalonier, it was given in appanage to the prince of Piombino and his

princess, a sister of Napoleon. The latter, after this royal progress,

recrossed the Alps, and returned to the capital of his empire; he soon

after departed for the camp at Boulogne, where a great maritime expedition

against England was preparing.

This project of descent which the directory had entertained after the

peace of Campo-Formio, and the first consul, after the peace of Lunéville,

had been resumed with much ardour since the new rupture. At the

commencement of 1805, a flotilla of two thousand small vessels, manned by

sixteen thousand sailors, carrying an army of one hundred and sixty

thousand men, nine thousand horses, and a numerous artillery, had

assembled in the ports of Boulogne, Etaples, Wimereux, Ambleteuse. and

Calais. The emperor was hastening by his presence the execution of this

project, when he learned that England, to avoid the descent with which it

was threatened, had prevailed on Austria to come to a rupture with France,

and that all the forces of the Austrian monarchy were in motion. Ninety

thousand men, under the archduke Ferdinand and general Mack, had crossed

the Jura, seized on Munich, and driven out the elector of Bavaria, the

ally of France; thirty thousand, under the archduke John, occupied the

Tyrol, and the archduke Charles, with one hundred thousand men, was

advancing on the Adige. Two Russian armies were preparing to join the

Austrians. Pitt had made the greatest efforts to organize this third

coalition. The establishment of the kingdom of Italy, the annexation of

Genoa and Piedmont to France, the open influence of the emperor over

Holland and Switzerland, had again aroused Europe, which now dreaded the

ambition of Napoleon as much as it had formerly feared the principles of

the revolution. The treaty of alliance between the British ministry and

the Russian cabinet had been signed on the 11th of April, 1805, and

Austria had acceded to it on the 9th of August.

Napoleon left Boulogne, returned hastily to Paris, repaired to the senate

on the 23rd of September, obtained a levy of eighty thousand men, and set

out the next day to begin the campaign. He passed the Rhine on the 1st of

October, and entered Bavaria on the 6th, with an army of a hundred and

sixty thousand men. Masséna held back Prince Charles in Italy, and the

emperor carried on the war in Germany at full speed. In a few days he

passed the Danube, entered Munich, gained the victory of Wertingen, and

forced general Mack to lay down his arms at Ulm. This capitulation

disorganized the Austrian army. Napoleon pursued the course of his

victories, entered Vienna on the 13th of November, and then marched into

Moravia to meet the Russians, round whom the defeated troops had rallied.

On the 2nd of December, 1805, the anniversary of the coronation, the two

armies met in the plains of Austerlitz. The enemy amounted to ninety-five

thousand men, the French to eighty thousand. On both sides the artillery

was formidable. The battle began at sunrise; these enormous masses began

to move; the Russian infantry could not stand against the impetuosity of

our troops and the manoeuvres of their general. The enemy's left was first

cut off; the Russian imperial guard came up to re-establish the

communication, and was entirely overwhelmed. The centre experienced the

same fate, and at one o'clock in the afternoon the most decisive victory

had completed this wonderful campaign. The following day the emperor

congratulated the army in a proclamation on the field of battle itself:

"Soldiers," said he, "I am satisfied with you. You have adorned your

eagles with immortal glory. An army of a hundred thousand men, commanded

by the emperors of Russia and Austria, in less than four days has been cut

to pieces or dispersed; those who escaped your steel have been drowned in

the lakes. Forty flags, the standards of the Russian imperial guard, a

hundred and twenty pieces of cannon, twenty generals, more than thirty

thousand prisoners, are the result of this ever memorable day. This

infantry, so vaunted and so superior in numbers, could not resist your

shock, and henceforth you have no more rivals to fear. Thus, in two

months, this third coalition has been defeated and dissolved." A truce was

concluded with Austria; and the Russians, who might have been cut to

pieces, obtained permission to retire by fixed stages.

The peace of Pressburg followed the victories of Ulm and Austerlitz; it

was signed on the 26th of December. The house of Austria, which had lost

its external possessions, Holland and the Milanese, was now assailed in

Germany itself. It gave up the provinces of Dalmatia and Albania to the

kingdom of Italy; the territory of the Tyrol, the town of Augsburg, the

principality of Eichstett, a part of the territory of Passau, and all its

possessions in Swabia, Brisgau, and Ortenau to the electorates of Bavaria

and Wurtemberg, which were transformed into kingdoms. The grand duchy of

Baden also profited by its spoils. The treaty of Pressburg completed the

humiliation of Austria, commenced by the treaty of Campo-Formio, and

continued by that of Lunéville. The emperor, on his return to Paris,

crowned with so much glory, became the object of such general and wild

admiration, that he was himself carried away by the public enthusiasm and

intoxicated at his fortune. The different bodies of the state contended

among themselves in obedience and flatteries. He received the title of

Great, and the senate passed a decree dedicating to him a triumphal

monument.

Napoleon became more confirmed in the principle he had espoused. The

victory of Marengo and the peace of Lunéville had sanctioned the

consulate; the victory of Austerlitz and peace of Pressburg consecrated

the empire. The last vestiges of the revolution were abandoned. On the 1st

of January, 1806, the Gregorian calendar definitively replaced the

republican calendar, after an existence of fourteen years. The Panthéon

was again devoted to purposes of worship, and soon even the tribunate

ceased to exist. But the emperor aimed especially at extending his

dominion over the continent. Ferdinand, king of Naples, having, during the

last war, violated the treaty of peace with France, had his states

invaded; and Joseph Bonaparte on the 30th of March was declared king of

the Two Sicilies. Soon after (June 5th, 1806), Holland was converted into

a kingdom, and received as monarch Louis Bonaparte, another brother of the

emperor. None of the republics created by the convention, or the

directory, now existed. Napoleon, in nominating secondary kings, restored

the military hierarchical system, and the titles of the middle ages. He

erected Dalmatia, Istria, Friuli, Cadore, Belluno, Conegliano, Treviso,

Feltra, Bassano, Vicenza, Padua, and Rovigo into duchies, great fiefs of

the empire. Marshal Berthier was invested with the principality of

Neufchâtel, the minister Talleyrand with that of Benevento. Prince

Borghese and his wife with that of Guastalla, Murat with the grand-duchy

of Berg and Clèves. Napoleon, not venturing to destroy the Swiss republic,

styled himself its mediator, and completed the organization of his

military empire by placing under his dependence the ancient Germanic body.

On the 12th of July, 1806, fourteen princes of the south and west of

Germany united themselves into the confederation of the Rhine, and

recognized Napoleon as their protector. On the 1st of August, they

signified to the diet of Ratisbon their separation from the Germanic body.

The empire of Germany ceased to exist, and Francis II. abdicated the title

by proclamation. By a convention signed at Vienna, on the 15th of

December, Prussia exchanged the territories of Anspach, Clèves, and

Neufchâtel for the electorate of Hanover. Napoleon had all the west under

his power. Absolute master of France and Italy, as emperor and king, he

was also master of Spain, by the dependence of that court; of Naples and

Holland, by his two brothers; of Switzerland, by the act of mediation; and

in Germany he had at his disposal the kings of Bavaria and Wurtemberg, and

the confederation of the Rhine against Austria and Prussia. After the

peace of Amiens, by supporting liberty he might have made himself the

protector of France and the moderator of Europe; but having sought glory

in domination, and made conquest the object of his life, he condemned

himself to a long struggle, which would inevitably terminate in the

dependence of the continent or in his own downfall.

This encroaching progress gave rise to the fourth coalition. Prussia,

neutral since the peace of Basle, had, in the last campaign, been on the

point of joining the Austro-Russian coalition. The rapidity of the

emperor's victories had alone restrained her; but now, alarmed at the

aggrandizement of the empire, and encouraged by the fine condition of her

troops, she leagued with Russia to drive the French from Germany. The

cabinet of Berlin required that the French troops should recross the

Rhine, or war would be the consequence. At the same time, it sought to

form in the north of Germany a league against the confederation of the

south. The emperor, who was in the plenitude of his prosperity and of

national enthusiasm, far from submitting to the _ultimatum_ of Prussia,

immediately marched against her.

The campaign opened early in October. Napoleon, as usual, overwhelmed the

coalition by the promptitude of his marches and the vigour of his

measures. On the 14th of October, he destroyed at Jena the military

monarchy of Prussia, by a decisive victory; on the 16th, fourteen thousand

Prussians threw down their arms at Erfurth; on the 25th, the French army

entered Berlin, and the close of 1806 was employed in taking the Prussian

fortresses and marching into Poland against the Russian army. The campaign

in Poland was less rapid, but as brilliant as that of Prussia. Russia, for

the third time, measured its strength with France. Conquered at Zurich and

Austerlitz, it was also defeated at Eylau and Friedland. After these

memorable battles, the emperor Alexander entered into a negotiation, and

concluded at Tilsit, on the 21st of June, 1807, an armistice which was

followed by a definitive treaty on the 7th of July.

The peace of Tilsit extended the French domination on the continent.

Prussia was reduced to half its extent. In the south of Germany, Napoleon

had instituted the two kingdoms of Bavaria and Wurtemberg against Austria;

further to the north, he created the two feudatory kingdoms of Saxony and

Westphalia against Prussia. That of Saxony, composed of the electorate of

that name, and Prussian Poland, called the grand-duchy of Warsaw, was

given to the king of Saxony; that of Westphalia comprehended the states of

Hesse-Cassel, Brunswick, Fulde, Paderborn, and the greatest part of

Hanover, and was given to Jerome Napoleon. The emperor Alexander, acceding

to all these arrangements, evacuated Moldavia and Wallachia. Russia,

however, though conquered, was the only power unencroached upon. Napoleon

followed more than ever in the footsteps of Charlemagne; at his

coronation, he had had the crown, sword, and sceptre, of the Frank king

carried before him. A pope had crossed the Alps to consecrate his dynasty,

and he modelled his states on the vast empire of that conqueror. The

revolution sought the establishment of ancient liberty; Napoleon restored

the military hierarchy of the middle ages. The former had made citizens,

the latter made vassals. The one had changed Europe into republics, the

other transformed it into fiefs. Great and powerful as he was, coming

immediately after a shock which had exhausted the world by its violence,

he was enabled to arrange it for a time according to his pleasure. The

_grand empire_ rose internally by its system of administration, which

replaced the government of assemblies; its special courts, its lyceums, in

which military education was substituted for the republican education of

the central schools; its hereditary nobility, which in 1808 completed the

establishment of inequality; its civil discipline, which rendered all

France like an army obedient to the word of command; and externally by its

secondary kingdoms, its confederate states, its great fiefs, and its

supreme chief. Napoleon, no longer meeting resistance anywhere, could

command from one end of the continent to the other.

At this period all the emperor's attention was directed to England, the

only power that could secure itself from his attacks. Pitt had been dead a

year, but the British cabinet followed with much ardour and pertinacity

his plans with respect to France. After having vainly formed a third and a

fourth coalition, it did not lay down arms. It was a war to the death.

Great Britain had declared France in a state of blockade, and furnished

the emperor with the means of cutting off its continental intercourse by a

similar measure. The continental blockade, which began in 1807, was the

second period of Bonaparte's system. In order to attain universal and

uncontested supremacy, he made use of arms against the continent, and the

cessation of commerce against England. But in forbidding to the

continental states all communication with England, he was preparing new

difficulties for himself, and soon added to the animosity of opinion

excited by his despotism, and the hatred of states produced by his

conquering domination, the exasperation of private interests and

commercial suffering occasioned by the blockade.

Yet all the powers seemed united in the same design. England was placed

under the ban of continental Europe, at the peace. Russia and Denmark in

the Northern Seas; France, Spain, and Holland, in the Mediterranean and

the ocean, were obliged to declare against it. This period was the height

of the imperial sway. Napoleon employed all his activity and all his

genius in creating maritime resources capable of counter-balancing the

forces of England, which had then eleven hundred ships of war of every

class. He caused ports to be constructed, coasts to be fortified, ships to

be built and prepared, everything for combating in a few years upon this

new battle-field. But before that moment arrived, he wished to secure the

Spanish peninsula, and to found his dynasty there, for the purpose of

introducing a firmer and more favourable policy. The expedition of

Portugal in 1807, and the invasion of Spain in 1808, began for him and for

Europe a new order of events.

Portugal had for some time been a complete English colony. The emperor, in

concert with the Bourbons of Madrid, decided by the treaty of

Fontainebleau, of the 27th of October, 1807, that the house of Braganza

had ceased to reign. A French army, under the command of Junot, entered

Portugal. The prince-regent embarked for Brazil, and the French took

possession of Lisbon on the 30th of November, 1807. This invasion was only

an approach towards Spain. The royal family were in a state of the

greatest anarchy. The favourite, Godoy, was execrated by the people, and

Ferdinand, prince of the Asturias, conspired against the authority of his

father's favourite. Though the emperor had not much to fear from such a

government, he had taken alarm at a clumsy armament prepared by Godoy

during the Prussian war. No doubt, at this time he formed the project of

putting one of his brothers on the throne of Spain; he thought he could

easily overturn a divided family, an expiring monarchy, and obtain the

consent of a people whom he would restore to civilization. Under the

pretext of the maritime war and the blockade, his troops entered the

peninsula, occupied the coasts and principal places, and encamped near

Madrid. It was then suggested to the royal family to retire to Mexico,

after the example of the house of Braganza. But the people rose against

this departure; Godoy, the object of public hatred, was in great risk of

losing his life, and the prince of the Asturias was proclaimed king, under

the title of Ferdinand VII. The emperor took advantage of this court

revolution to bring about his own. The French entered Madrid, and he

himself proceeded to Bayonne, whither he summoned the Spanish princes.

Ferdinand restored the crown to his father, who in his turn resigned it in

favour of Napoleon; the latter had it decreed on his brother Joseph by a

supreme junta, by the council of Castille, and the municipality of Madrid.

Ferdinand was sent to the Château de Valençay, and Charles VI. fixed his

residence at Compiègne. Napoleon called his brother-in-law, Murat, grand-

duke of Berg, to the throne of Naples, in the place of Joseph.

At this period began the first opposition to the domination of the emperor

and the continental system. The reaction manifested itself in three

countries hitherto allies of France, and it brought on the fifth

coalition. The court of Rome was dissatisfied; the peninsula was wounded

in its national pride by having imposed upon it a foreign king; in its

usages, by the suppression of convents, of the Inquisition, and of the

grandees; Holland suffered in its commerce from the blockade, and Austria

supported impatiently its losses and subordinate condition. England,

watching for an opportunity to revive the struggle on the continent,

excited the resistance of Rome, the peninsula, and the cabinet of Vienna.

The pope had been cold towards France since 1805; he had hoped that his

pontifical complaisance in reference to Napoleon's coronation would have

been recompensed by the restoration to the ecclesiastical domain of those

provinces which the directory had annexed to the Cisalpine republic.

Deceived in this expectation, he joined the European counter-revolutionary

opposition, and from 1807 to 1808 the Roman States became the rendezvous

of English emissaries. After some warm remonstrances, the emperor ordered

general Miollis to occupy Rome; the pope threatened him with

excommunication; and Napoleon seized on the legations of Ancona, Urbino,

Macerata, and Camerino, which became part of the Italian kingdom. The

legate left Paris on the 3rd of April, 1808, and the religious struggle

for temporal interests commenced with the head of the church, whom

Napoleon should either not have recognised, or not have despoiled.

The war with the peninsula was still more serious. The Spaniards

recognised Ferdinand VII. as king, in a provincial junta, held at Seville,

on the 27th of May, 1808, and they took arms in all the provinces which

were not occupied by French troops. The Portuguese also rose at Oporto, on

the 16th of June. These two insurrections were at first attended with the

happiest results; in a short time they made rapid progress. General Dupont

laid down arms at Baylen in the province of Cordova, and this first

reverse of the French arms excited the liveliest hope and enthusiasm among

the Spaniards. Joseph Napoleon left Madrid, where Ferdinand VII. was

proclaimed; and about the same time, Junot, not having troops enough to

keep Portugal, consented, by the convention of Cintra, to evacuate it with

all the honours of war. The English general, Wellington, took possession

of this kingdom with twenty-five thousand men. While the pope was

declaring against Napoleon, while the Spanish insurgents were entering

Madrid, while the English were again setting foot on the continent, the

king of Sweden avowed himself an enemy of the European imperial league,

and Austria was making considerable armaments and preparing for a new

struggle.

Fortunately for Napoleon, Russia remained faithful to the alliance and

engagements of Tilsit. The emperor Alexander had at that time a fit of

enthusiasm and affection for this powerful and extraordinary mortal.

Napoleon wishing to be sure of the north, before he conveyed all his

forces to the peninsula, had an interview with Alexander at Erfurt, on the

27th September, 1808. The two masters of the north and west guaranteed to

each other the repose and submission of Europe. Napoleon marched into

Spain, and Alexander undertook Sweden. The presence of the emperor soon

changed the fortune of the war in the peninsula. He brought with him

eighty thousand veteran soldiers, just come from Germany. Several

victories made him master of most of the Spanish provinces. He made his

entry into Madrid, and presented himself to the inhabitants of the

peninsula, not as a master, but as a liberator. "I have abolished," he

said to them, "the tribunal of the Inquisition, against which the age and

Europe protested. Priests should direct the conscience, but ought not to

exercise any external or corporal jurisdiction over the citizens. I have

suppressed feudal rights; and every one may set up inns, ovens, mills,

fisheries, and give free impulse to his industry. The selfishness, wealth,

and prosperity of a few did more injury to your agriculture than the heats

of the extreme summer. As there is but one God, one system of justice only

should exist in a state. All private tribunals were usurped and opposed to

the rights of the nation. I have suppressed them. The present generation

may change its opinion; too many passions have been brought into play; but

your grandchildren will bless me as your regenerator; they will rank among

their memorable days those in which I appeared among you, and from those

days will Spain date its prosperity."

Such was indeed the part of Napoleon in the peninsula, which could only be

restored to a better state of things, and to liberty, by the revival of

civilization. The establishment of independence cannot be effected all at

once, any more than anything else; and when a country is ignorant, poor,

and backward, covered with convents, and governed by monks, its social

condition must be reconstructed before liberty can be thought of.

Napoleon, the oppressor of civilized nations, was a real regenerator for

the peninsula. But the two parties of civil liberty and religious

servitude, that of the cortes and that of the monks, though with far

different aims, came to an understanding for their common defence. The one

was at the head of the upper and the middle classes, the other of the

populace; and they vied with each other in exciting the Spaniards to

enthusiasm with the sentiments of independence or religious fanaticism.

The following is the catechism used by the priests: "Tell me, my child,

who you are? A Spaniard by the grace of God.--Who is the enemy of our

happiness? The emperor of the French.--How many natures has he? Two: human

and diabolical.--How many emperors of the French are there? One true one,

in three deceptive persons.--What are their names, Napoleon, Murat, and

Manuel Godoy.--Which of the three is the most wicked? They are all three

equally so.--Whence is Napoleon derived? From sin.--Murat? From Napoleon.

--And Godoy? The junction of the two.--What is the ruling spirit of the

first? Pride and despotism.--Of the second? Rapine and cruelty.--Of the

third? Cupidity, treason, and ignorance.--Who are the French? Former

Christians become heretics.--Is it a sin to kill a Frenchman? No, father;

heaven is gained by killing one of these dogs of heretics.--What

punishment does the Spaniard deserve who has failed in his duty? The death

and infamy of a traitor.--What will deliver us from our enemies?

Confidence in ourselves and in arms."

Napoleon had engaged in a long and dangerous enterprise, in which his

whole system of war was at fault. Victory, here, did not consist in the

defeat of an army and the possession of a capital, but in the entire

occupation of the territory, and, what was still more difficult, the

submission of the public mind. Napoleon, however, was preparing to subdue

this people with his irresistible activity and inflexible determination,

when the fifth coalition called him again to Germany.

Austria had turned to advantage his absence, and that of his troops. It

made a powerful effort, and raised five hundred and fifty thousand men,

comprising the Landwehr, and took the field in the spring of 1809. The

Tyrol rose, and king Jerome was driven from his capital by the

Westphalians; Italy wavered; and Prussia only waited till Napoleon met

with a reverse, to take arms; but the emperor was still at the height of

his power and prosperity. He hastened from Madrid in the beginning of

February, and directed the members of the confederation to keep their

contingents in readiness. On the 12th of April he left Paris, passed the

Rhine, plunged into Germany, gained the victories of Eckmühl and Essling,

occupied Vienna a second time on the 15th of May, and overthrew this new

coalition by the battle of Wagram, after a campaign of four months. While

he was pursuing the Austrian armies, the English landed on the island of

Walcheren, and appeared before Antwerp; but a levy of national guards

sufficed to frustrate the expedition of the Scheldt. The peace of Vienna,

of the 11th of October, 1809, deprived the house of Austria of several

more provinces, and compelled it again to adopt the continental system.

This period was remarkable for the new character of the struggle. It began

the reaction of Europe against the empire, and announced the alliance of

dynasties, people, nations, the priesthood, and commerce. All whose

interests were injured made an attempt at resistance, which at first was

destined to fail. Napoleon, since the peace of Amiens, had entered on a

career that must necessarily terminate in the possession or hostility of

all Europe. Carried away by his character and position, he had created

against the people a system of administration of unparalleled benefit to

power; against Europe, a system of secondary monarchies and grand fiefs,

which facilitated his plans of conquest; and, lastly, against England, the

blockade which suspended its commerce, and that of the continent. Nothing

impeded him in the realization of those immense but insensate designs.

Portugal opened a communication with the English: he invaded it. The royal

family of Spain, by its quarrels and vacillations, compromised the

extremities of the empire: he compelled it to abdicate, that he might

reduce the peninsula to a bolder and less wavering policy. The pope kept

up relations with the enemy: his patrimony was diminished. He threatened

excommunication: the French entered Rome. He realized his threat by a

bull: he was dethroned as a temporal sovereign in 1809. Finally, after the

battle of Wagram, and the peace of Vienna, Holland became a depot for

English merchandise, on account of its commercial wants, and the emperor

dispossessed his brother Louis of that kingdom, which, on the 1st of July,

1810, became incorporated with the empire. He shrank from no invasion,

because he would not endure opposition or hesitation from any quarter. All

were compelled to submit, allies as well as enemies, the chief of the

church as well as kings, brothers as well as strangers; but, though

conquered this time, all who had joined this new league only waited an

opportunity to rise again.

Meantime, after the peace of Vienna, Napoleon still added to the extent

and power of the empire. Sweden having undergone an internal revolution,

and the king, Gustavus Adolphus IV., having been forced to abdicate,

admitted the continental system. Bernadotte, prince of Ponte-Corvo, was

elected by the states-general hereditary prince of Sweden, and king

Charles XIII. adopted him for his son. The blockade was observed

throughout Europe; and the empire, augmented by the Roman States, the

Illyrian provinces, Valais, Holland, and the Hanse Towns, had a hundred

and thirty departments, and extended from Hamburg and Dantzic to Trieste

and Corfu. Napoleon, who seemed to follow a rash but inflexible policy,

deviated from his course about this time by a second marriage. He divorced

Josephine that he might give an heir to the empire, and married, on the

1st of April, 1810, Marie-Louise, arch-duchess of Austria. This was a

decided error. He quitted his position and his post as a parvenu and

revolutionary monarch, opposing in Europe the ancient courts as the

republic had opposed the ancient governments. He placed himself in a false

situation with respect to Austria, which he ought either to have crushed

after the victory of Wagram, or to have reinstated in its possessions

after his marriage with the arch-duchess. Solid alliances only repose on

real interests, and Napoleon could not remove from the cabinet of Vienna

the desire or power of renewing hostilities. This marriage also changed

the character of his empire, and separated it still further from popular

interests; he sought out old families to give lustre to his court, and did

all he could to amalgamate together the old and the new nobility as he

mingled old and new dynasties. Austerlitz had established the plebeian

empire; after Wagram was established the noble empire. The birth, on the

20th of March, 1811, of a son, who received the title of King of Rome,

seemed to consolidate the power of Napoleon by securing to him a

successor.

The war in Spain was prosecuted with vigour during the years 1810 and

1811. The territory of the peninsula was defended inch by inch, and its

was necessary to take several towns by storm. Suchet, Soult, Mortier, Ney,

and Sebastiani made themselves masters of several provinces; and the

Spanish junta, unable to keep their post at Seville, retired to Cadiz,

which the French army began to blockade. The new expedition into Portugal

was less fortune. Masséna, who directed it, at first obliged Wellington to

retreat, and took Oporto and Olivença; but the English general having

entrenched himself in the strong position of Torres-Vedras, Masséna,

unable to force it, was compelled to evacuate the country.

While the war was proceeding in the peninsula with advantage, but without

any decided success, a new campaign was preparing in the north. Russia

perceived the empire of Napoleon approaching its territories. Shut up in

its own limits, it remained without influence or acquisitions; suffering

from the blockade, without gaining any advantage by the war. This cabinet,

moreover, endured with impatience a supremacy to which it itself aspired,

and which it had pursued slowly but without interruption since the reign

of Peter the Great. About the close of 1810, it increased its armies,

renewed its commercial relations with Great Britain, and did not seem

indisposed to a rupture. The year 1811 was spent in negotiations which led

to nothing, and preparations for war were made on both sides. The emperor,

whose armies were before Cadiz, and who relied on the co-operation of the

West and North against Russia, made with ardour preparations for an

enterprise which was intended to reduce the only power as yet untouched,

and to carry his victorious eagles even to Moscow. He obtained the

assistance of Prussia and Austria, which engaged by the treaties of the

24th of February and the 14th of March, 1812, to furnish auxiliary bodies;

one of twenty, and the other of thirty thousand men. All the unemployed

forces of France were immediately on foot. A senatus-consultus divided the

national guard into three bodies for the home service, and appropriated a

hundred of the first line regiments (nearly a hundred thousand men) for

active military service. On the 9th of March, Napoleon left Paris on this

vast expedition. During several months he fixed his court at Dresden,

where the emperor of Austria, the king of Prussia, and all the sovereigns

of Germany, came to bow before his high fortune. On the 22nd of June, war

was declared against Russia.

In this campaign, Napoleon was guided by the maxims he had always found

successful. He had terminated all the wars he had undertaken by the rapid

defeat of the enemy, the occupation of his capital, and concluded the

peace by parcelling out his territory. His project was to reduce Russia by

creating the kingdom of Poland, as he had reduced Austria by forming the

kingdoms of Bavaria and Wurtemberg, after Austerlitz; and Prussia, by

organizing those of Saxony and Westphalia, after Jena. With this object,

he had stipulated with the Austrian cabinet by the treaty of the 14th of

March, to exchange Gallicia for the Illyrian provinces. The establishment

of the kingdom of Poland was proclaimed by the diet of Warsaw, but in an

incomplete manner, and Napoleon, who, according to his custom, wished to

finish all in one campaign, advanced at once into the heart of Russia,

instead of prudently organizing the Polish barrier against it. His army

amounted to about five hundred thousand men. He passed the Niemen on the

24th of June, took Vilna, and Vitepsk, defeated the Russians at Astrowno,

Polotsk, Mohilev, Smolensk, at the Moskva, and on the 14th of September,

made his entry into Moscow.

The Russian cabinet relied for its defence not only upon its troops, but

on its vast territory and on its climate. As the conquered armies

retreated before ours, they burnt all the towns, devastated the provinces,

and thus prepared great difficulties for the foe in the event of reverses

or retreat. According to this plan of defence, Moscow was burnt by its

governor Rostopchin, as Smolensk, Dorigoboui, Viasma, Gjhat, Mojaisk, and

a great number of other towns and villages had already been. The emperor

ought to have seen that this war would not terminate as the others had

done; yet, conqueror of the foe, and master of his capital, he conceived

hopes of peace which the Russians skilfully encouraged. Winter was

approaching, and Napoleon prolonged his stay at Moscow for six weeks. He

delayed his movements on account of the deceptive negotiations of the

Russians, and did not decide on a retreat till the 19th of October. This

retreat was disastrous, and began the downfall of the empire. Napoleon

could not have been defeated by the hand of man, for what general could

have triumphed over this incomparable chief? what army could have

conquered the French army? But his reverses were to take place in the

remote limits of Europe; in the frozen regions which were to end his

conquering domination. He lost, with the close of this campaign, not by a

defeat, but by cold and famine, in the midst of Russian snows and

solitude, his old army, and the _prestige_ of his fortune.

The retreat was effected with some order as far as the Berezina, where it

became one vast rout. After the passage of this river, Napoleon, who had

hitherto accompanied his army, started in a sledge for Paris, in great

haste, a conspiracy having broken out there during his absence. General

Mallet, with a few others, had conceived the design of overthrowing this

colossus of power. His enterprise was daring; and as it was grounded on a

false report of Napoleon's death, it was necessary to deceive too many for

success to be probable. Besides, the empire was still firmly established,

and it was not a plot, but a slow and general defection which could

destroy it. Mallet's plot failed, and its leaders were executed. The

emperor, on his return, found the nation astounded at so unusual a

disaster. But the different bodies of the state still manifested implicit

obedience. He reached Paris on the 18th of December, obtained a levy of

three hundred thousand men, inspired a spirit of sacrifice, re-equipped in

a short time, with his wonderful activity, a new army, and took the field

again on the 15th of April, 1813.

But since the retreat of Moscow, Napoleon had entered on a new series of

events. It was in 1812 that the decline of the empire manifested itself.

The weariness of his domination became general. All those by whose consent

he had risen, took part against him. The priests had conspired in secret

since his rupture with the pope. Eight state prisons had been created in

an official manner against the dissentients of his party. The national

masses were as tired of conquest as they had formerly been of factions.

They had expected from him consideration for private interests, the

promotion of commerce; respect for men; and they were oppressed by

conscriptions, taxes, the blockade, provost courts, and duties which were

the inevitable consequences of this conquering system. He had no longer

for adversaries the few who remained faithful to the political object of

the revolution, and whom he styled _idéologues_, but all who, without

definite ideas, wished for the material advantages of better civilization.

Without, whole nations groaned beneath the military yoke, and the fallen

dynasties aspired to rise again. The whole world was ill at ease; and one

check served to bring about a general rising. "I triumphed," says Napoleon

himself, speaking of the preceding campaigns, "in the midst of constantly

reviving perils. I constantly required as much address as voice. Had I not

conquered at Austerlitz, all Prussia would have been upon me; had I not

triumphed at Jena, Austria and Spain would have attacked my rear; had I

not fought at Wagram, which action was not a decided victory, I had reason

to fear that Russia would forsake, Prussia rise against me, and the

English were before Antwerp." [Footnote: _Mémorial de Saint Hélène_, tome

ii. p. 221.] Such was his condition; the further he advanced in his

career, the greater need he had to conquer more and more decisively.

Accordingly, as soon as he was defeated, the kings he had subdued, the

kings he had made, the allies he had aggrandized, the states he had

incorporated with the empire, the senators who had so flattered him, and

even his comrades in arms, successively forsook him. The field of battle

extended to Moscow in 1812, drew back to Dresden in 1813, and to Paris in

1814: so rapid was the reverse of fortune.

The cabinet of Berlin began the defections. On the 1st of March, 1813, it

joined Russia and England, which were forming the sixth coalition. Sweden

acceded to it soon after; yet the emperor, whom the confederate powers

thought prostrated by the last disaster, opened the campaign with new

victories. The battle of Lützen, won by conscripts, on the 2nd of May, the

occupation of Dresden, the victory of Bautzen, and the war carried to the

Elbe, astonished the coalition. Austria, which, since 1810, had been on a

footing of peace, was resuming arms, and already meditating a change of

alliance. She now offered to act as mediator between the emperor and the

confederates. Her mediation was accepted; an armistice was concluded at

Plesswitz, on the 4th of June, and a congress assembled at Prague to

negotiate peace. It was impossible to come to terms. Napoleon would not

consent to diminished grandeur; Europe would not consent to remain subject

to him. The confederate powers, joined by Austria, required that the

limits of the empire should be to the Rhine, the Alps, and the Meuse. The

negotiators separated without coming to an agreement. Austria joined the

coalition, and war, the only means of settling this great contest, was

resumed.

The emperor had only two hundred and eighty thousand men against five

hundred and twenty thousand; he wished to force the enemy to retire behind

the Elbe, and to break up, as usual, this new coalition by the promptitude

and vigour of his blows. Victory seemed, at first, to second him. At

Dresden, he defeated the combined forces; but the defeats of his

lieutenants deranged his plans. Macdonald was conquered in Silesia; Ney,

near Berlin; Vandamme, at Kulm. Unable to obstruct the enemy, pouring on

him from all parts, Napoleon thought of retreating. The princes of the

confederation of the Rhine chose this moment to desert the cause of the

empire. A vast engagement having taken place at Leipzic between the two

armies, the Saxons and Wurtembergers passed over to the enemy on the field

of battle. This defection to the strength of the allied powers, who had

learned a more compact and skilful mode of warfare, obliged Napoleon to

retreat, after a struggle of three days. The army advanced with much

confusion towards the Rhine, where the Bavarians, who had also deserted,

attempted to prevent its passage. But it overwhelmed them at Hanau, and

re-entered the territory of the empire on the 30th of October, 1813. The

close of this campaign was as disastrous as that of the preceding one.

France was threatened in its own limits, as it had been in 1799; but the

enthusiasm of independence no longer existed, and the man who deprived it

of its rights found it, at this great crisis, incapable of sustaining him

or defending itself. The servitude of nations is, sooner or later, ever

avenged.

Napoleon returned to Paris on the 9th of November, 1813. He obtained from

the senate a levy of three hundred thousand men, and made with great

ardour preparations for a new campaign. He convoked the legislative body

to associate it in the common defence; he communicated to it the documents

relative to the negotiations of Prague, and asked for another and last

effort in order to secure a glorious peace, the general wish of France.

But the legislative body, hitherto silently obedient, chose this period to

resist Napoleon.

It shared the common exhaustion, and without desiring it, was under the

influence of the royalist party, which had been secretly agitating ever

since the decline of the empire had revived its hopes. A commission,

composed of MM. Lainé, Raynouard, Gallois, Flaugergues, Maine de Biran,

drew up a very hostile report, censuring the course adopted by the

government, and demanding that all conquests should be given up, and

liberty restored. This wish, so just at any other time, could then only

favour the invasion of the foe. Though the confederate powers seemed to

make the evacuation of Europe the condition of peace, they were disposed

to push victory to extremity. Napoleon, irritated by this unexpected and

harassing opposition, suddenly dismissed the legislative body. This

commencement of resistance announced internal defections. After passing

from Russia to Germany, they were about to extend from Germany and Italy

to France. But now, as before, all depended on the issue of the war, which

the winter had not interrupted. Napoleon placed all his hopes on it; and

started from Paris on the 25th of January, for this immortal campaign.

The empire was invaded in all directions. The Austrians entered Italy; the

English, having made themselves masters of the peninsula during the last

two years, had passed the Bidassoa, under general Wellington, and appeared

on the Pyrenees. Three armies pressed on France to the east and north. The

great allied army, amounting to a hundred and fifty thousand men, under

Schwartzenberg, advanced by Switzerland; the army of Silesia, of a hundred

and thirty thousand, under Blücher, by Frankfort; and that of the north,

of a hundred thousand men, under Bernadotte, had seized on Holland and

entered Belgium. The enemies, in their turn, neglected the fortified

places, and, taking a lesson from the conqueror, advanced on the capital.

When Napoleon left Paris, the two armies of Schwartzenberg and Blücher

were on the point of effecting a junction in Champaigne. Deprived of the

support of the people, who were only lookers on, Napoleon was left alone

against the whole world with a handful of veterans and his genius, which

had lost nothing of its daring and vigour. At this moment, he stands out

nobly, no longer an oppressor; no longer a conqueror; defending, inch by

inch, with new victories, the soil of his country, and at the same time,

his empire and renown.

He marched into Champaigne against the two great hostile armies. General

Maison was charged to intercept Bernadotte in Belgium; Augereau, the

Austrians, at Lyons; Soult, the English, on the Spanish frontier. Prince

Eugene was to defend Italy; and the empire, though penetrated in the very

centre, still stretched its vast arms into the depths of Germany by its

garrisons beyond the Rhine. Napoleon did not despair of driving these

swarms of foes from the territory of France by means of a powerful

military reaction, and again planting his standards in the countries of

the enemy. He placed himself skilfully between Blücher, who was descending

the Marne, and Schwartzenberg, who descended the Seine; he hastened from

one of these armies to the other, and defeated them alternately; Blücher

was overpowered at Champ-Aubert, Montmirail, Château-Thierry, and

Vauchamps; and when his army was destroyed, Napoleon returned to the

Seine, defeated the Austrians at Montereau, and drove them before him. His

combinations were so strong, his activity so great, his measures so sure,

that he seemed on the point of entirely disorganizing these two formidable

armies, and with them annihilating the coalition.

But if he conquered wherever he came, the foe triumphed wherever he was

not. The English had entered Bordeaux, where a party had declared for the

Bourbon family; the Austrians occupied Lyons; the Belgian army had joined

the remnant of that of Blücher, which re-appeared on Napoleon's rear.

Defection now entered his own family, and Murat had just followed, in

Italy, the example of Bernadotte, by joining the coalition. The grand

officers of the empire still served him, but languidly, and he only found

ardour and fidelity in his subaltern generals and indefatigable soldiers.

Napoleon had again marched on Blücher, who had escaped from him thrice: on

the left of the Marne, by a sudden frost, which hardened the muddy ways

amongst which the Prussians had involved themselves, and were in danger of

perishing; on the Aisne, through the defection of Soissons, which opened a

passage to them, at a moment when they had no other way of escape; and

Laon, by the fault of the duke of Ragusa, who prevented a decisive battle,

by suffering himself to be surprised by night. After so many fatalities,

which frustrated the surest plans, Napoleon, ill sustained by his

generals, surrounded by the coalition, conceived the bold design of

transporting himself to Saint-Dizier and closing on the enemy the egress

from France. This daring march so full of genius, startled for a moment

the confederate generals, from whom it cut off all retreat; but, excited

by secret encouragements, without being anxious for their rear, they

advanced on Paris.

This great city, the only capital of Europe which had not been the theatre

of war, suddenly saw all the troops of Europe enter its plains, and was on

the point of undergoing the common humiliation. It was left to itself. The

empress, appointed regent a few months before, had just left it to repair

to Blois. Napoleon was at a distance. There was not that despair and that

movement of liberty which drive a people to resistance; war was no longer

made on nations, but on governments, and the emperor had centred all the

public interest in himself, and placed all his means of defence in

mechanical troops. The exhaustion was great; a feeling of pride, of very

just pride, alone made the approach of the stranger painful, and oppressed

every Frenchman's heart at seeing his native land trodden by armies so

long vanquished. But this sentiment was not sufficiently strong to raise

the masses of the population against the enemy; and the measures of the

royalist party, at the head of which the prince of Benevento placed

himself, called the allied troops to the capital. An action took place,

however, on the 30th of March, under the walls of Paris; but on the 31st,

the gates were opened to the confederate forces, who entered in pursuance

of a capitulation. The senate consummated the great imperial defection by

forsaking its old master; it was influenced by M. de Talleyrand, who for

some time had been out of favour with Napoleon. This voluntary actor in

every crisis of power had just declared against him. With no attachment to

party, of a profound political indifference, he foresaw from a distance

with wonderful sagacity the fall of a government; withdrew from it

opportunely; and when the precise moment for assailing it had arrived,

joined in the attack with all his talents, his influence, his name, and

his authority, which he had taken care to preserve. In favour of the

revolution, under the constituent assembly; of the directory, on the 18th

Fructidor; for the consulate, on the 18th Brumaire; for the empire, in

1804, he was for the restoration of the royal family, in 1814; he seemed

grand master of the ceremonies for the party in power, and for the last

thirty years it was he who had dismissed and installed the successive

governments. The senate, influenced by him, appointed a provisional

government, and declared Napoleon deposed from his throne, the hereditary

rights of his family abolished, the people and army freed from their oath

of fidelity. It proclaimed him _tyrant_ whose despotism it had facilitated

by its adulation. Meantime, Napoleon, urged by those about him to succour

the capital, had abandoned his march on Saint-Dizier, and hastened to

Paris at the head of fifty thousand men, in the hope of preventing the

entry of the enemy. On his arrival (1st of April), he heard of the

capitulation of the preceding day, and fell back on Fontainebleau, where

he learned the defection of the senate, and his deposition. Then finding

that all gave way around him in his ill fortune, the people, the senate,

generals and courtiers, he decided on abdicating in favour of his son. He

sent the duke of Vicenza, the prince of the Moskva, and the duke of

Tarento, as plenipotentiaries to the confederates; on their way, they were

to take with them the duke of Ragusa, who covered Fontainebleau with a

corps.

Napoleon, with his fifty thousand men, and strong military position, could

yet oblige the coalition to admit the claim of his son. But the duke of

Ragusa forsook his post, treated with the enemy, and left Fontainebleau

exposed. Napoleon was then obliged to submit to the conditions of the

allied powers; their pretensions increased with their power. At Prague,

they ceded to him the empire, with the Alps and the Rhine for limits;

after the invasion of France, they offered him at Châtillon the

possessions of the old monarchy only; later, they refused to treat with

him except in favour of his son; but now, determined on destroying all

that remained of the revolution with respect to Europe, its conquest and

dynasty, they compelled Napoleon to abdicate absolutely. On the 11th of

April, 1814, he renounced for himself and children the thrones of France

and Italy, and received the little island of Elba in exchange for his vast

sovereignty, the limits of which had extended from Cadiz to the Baltic

Sea. On the 20th, after an affecting farewell to his old soldiers, he

departed for his new principality.

Thus fell this man, who alone, for fourteen years, had filled the world.

His enterprising and organising genius, his power of life and will, his

love of glory, and the immense disposable force which the revolution

placed in his hands, have made him the most gigantic being of modern

times. That which would have rendered the destiny of another

extraordinary, scarcely counts in his. Rising from an obscure to the

highest rank; from a simple artillery officer becoming the chief of the

greatest of nations, he dared to conceive the idea of universal monarchy,

and for a moment realized it. After having obtained the empire by his

victories, he wished to subdue Europe by means of France, and reduce

England by means of Europe, and he established the military system against

the continent, the blockade against Great Britain. This design succeeded

for some years; from Lisbon to Moscow he subjected people and potentates

to his word of command as general, and to the vast sequestration which he

prescribed. But in this way he failed in discharging his restorative

mission of the 18th Brumaire. By exercising on his own account the power

he had received, by attacking the liberty of the people by despotic

institutions, the independence of states by war, he excited against

himself the opinions and interests of the human race; he provoked

universal hostility. The nation forsook him, and after having been long

victorious, after having planted his standard in every capital, after

having during ten years augmented his power, and gained a kingdom with

every battle, a single reverse combined the world against him, proving by

his fall how impossible in our days is despotism.

Yet Napoleon, amidst all the disastrous results of his system, gave a

prodigious impulse to the continent; his armies carried with them the

ideas and customs of the more advanced civilization of France. European

societies were shaken on their old foundations; nations were mingled by

frequent intercourse; bridges thrown across boundary rivers; high roads

made over the Alps, Apennines, and Pyrenees, brought territories nearer to

each other; and Napoleon effected for the material condition of states

what the revolution had done for the minds of men. The blockade completed

the impulse of conquest; it improved continental industry, enabling it to

take the place of that of England, and replaced colonial commerce by the

produce of manufactures. Thus Napoleon, by agitating nations, contributed

to their civilization. His despotism rendered him counter-revolutionary

with respect to France; but his spirit of conquest made him a regenerator

with respect to Europe, of which many nations, in torpor till he came,

will live henceforth with the life he gave them. But in this Napoleon

obeyed the dictates of his nature. The child of war--war was his tendency,

his pleasure: domination his object; he wanted to master the world, and

circumstances placed it in his hand, in order that he might make use of

it.

Napoleon has presented in France what Cromwell presented for a moment in

England; the government of the army, which always establishes itself when

a revolution is contended against; it then gradually changes, and from

being civil, as it was at first, becomes military. In Great Britain,

internal war not being complicated with foreign war, on account of the

geographical situation of the country, which isolated it from other

states, as soon as the enemies of reform were vanquished, the army passed

from the field of battle to the government. Its intervention being

premature, Cromwell, its general, found parties still in the fury of their

passions, in all the fanaticism of their opinions, and he directed against

them alone his military administration. The French revolution taking place

on the continent saw the nations disposed for liberty, and sovereigns

leagued from a fear of the liberation of their people. It had not only

internal enemies, but also foreign enemies to contend with; and while its

armies were repelling Europe, parties were overthrowing each other in the

assemblies. The military intervention came later; Napoleon, finding

factions defeated and opinions almost forsaken, obtained obedience easily

from the nation, and turned the military government against Europe.

This difference of position materially influenced the conduct and

character of these two extraordinary men. Napoleon, disposing of immense

force and of uncontested power, gave himself up in security to the vast

designs and the part of a conqueror; while Cromwell, deprived of the

assent which a worn out people could give, and, incessantly attacked by

factions, was reduced to neutralise them one by the other, and keep

himself to the end the military dictator of parties. The one employed his

genius in undertaking; the other in resisting. Accordingly, the former had

the frankness and decision of power; the other, the craft and hypocrisy of

opposed ambition. This situation would destroy their sway.

All dictatorships are transient; and however strong or great, it is

impossible for any one long to subject parties or long to retain kingdoms.

It is this that, sooner or later, would have led to the fall of Cromwell

(had he lived longer,) by internal conspiracies; and that brought on the

downfall of Napoleon, by the raising of Europe. Such is the fate of all

powers which, arising from liberty, do not continue to abide with her. In

1814, the empire had just been destroyed; the revolutionary parties had

ceased to exist since the 18th Brumaire. All the governments of this

political period had been exhausted. The senate recalled the old royal

family. Already unpopular on account of its past servility, it ruined-

itself in public opinion by publishing a constitution, tolerably liberal,

but which placed on the same footing the pensions of senators and the

guarantees of the nation. The Count d'Artois, who had been the first to

leave France, was the first to return, in the character of lieutenant-

general of the kingdom. He signed, on the 23rd of April, the convention of

Paris, which reduced the French territory to its limits of the 1st of

January, 1792, and by which Belgium, Savoy, Nice, and Geneva, and immense

military stores, ceased to belong to us. Louis XVIII. landed at Calais on

the 24th of April, and entered Paris with solemnity on the 3rd of May,

1814, after having, on the 2nd, made the Declaration of Saint Omer, which

fixed the principles of the representative government, and which was

followed on the 2nd of June by the promulgation of the charter.

At this epoch, a new series of events begins. The year 1814 was the term

of the great movement of the preceding five and twenty years. The

revolution had been political, as directed against the absolute power of

the court and the privileged classes, and military, because Europe had

attacked it. The reaction which arose at that time only destroyed the

empire and brought about the coalition in Europe, and the representative

system in France; such was to be its first period. Later, it opposed the

revolution, and produced the holy alliance against the people, and the

government of a party against the charter. This retrograde movement

necessarily had its course and limits. France can only be ruled in a

durable manner by satisfying the twofold need which made it undertake the

revolution. It requires real political liberty in the government; and in

society, the material prosperity produced by the continually progressing

development of civilization.

History of the French Revolution from 1789 to 1814 · 第 16 / 16 章