CHAPTER XI

FROM THE 1ST PRAIRIAL (20TH OF MAY, 1795) TO THE 4TH BRUMAIRE (26TH OF

OCTOBER), YEAR IV., THE CLOSE OF THE CONVENTION

The exterior prosperity of the revolution chiefly contributed to the fall

of the dictatorial government and of the Jacobin party. The increasing

victories of the republic to which they had very greatly contributed by

their vigorous measures, and by their enthusiasm, rendered their power

superfluous. The committee of public safety, by crushing with its strong

and formidable hand the interior of France, had developed resources,

organized armies, found generals and guided them to victories which

ultimately secured the triumph of the revolution in the face of Europe. A

prosperous position no longer required the same efforts; its mission was

accomplished, the peculiar province of such a dictatorship being to save a

country and a cause, and to perish by the very safety it has secured.

Internal events have prevented our rapidly describing the impulse which

the committee of public safety gave to the armies after the 31st of May,

and the results which it obtained from it.

The levy en masse that took place in the summer of 1793, formed the troops

of the Mountain. The leaders of that party soon selected from the

secondary ranks generals belonging to the Mountain to replace the

Girondist generals. Those generals were Jourdan, Pichegru, Hoche, Moreau,

Westermann, Dugommier, Marceau, Joubert, Kléber, etc. Carnot, by his

admission to the committee of public safety, became minister of war and

commander-in-chief of all the republican armies. Instead of scattered

bodies, acting without concert upon isolated points, he proceeded with

strong masses, concentrated on one object. He commenced the practice of a

great plan of warfare, which he tried with decided success at Watignies,

in his capacity of commissioner of the convention. This important victory,

at which he assisted in person, drove the allied generals, Clairfait and

the prince of Coburg, behind the Sambre, and raised the siege of Maubeuge.

During the winter of 1793 and 1794 the two armies continued in presence of

each other without undertaking anything.

At the opening of the campaign, they each conceived a plan of invasion.

The Austrian army advanced upon the towns on the Somme, Péronne, Saint-

Quentin, Arras, and threatened Paris, while the French army again

projected the conquest of Belgium. The plan of the committee of public

safety was combined in a very different way to the vague design of the

coalition. Pichegru, at the head of fifty thousand men of the army of the

north, entered Flanders, resting on the sea and the Scheldt. On his right,

Moreau advanced with twenty thousand men upon Menin and Courtrai. General

Souham, with thirty thousand men, remained under Lille, to sustain the

extreme right of the invading army against the Austrians; while Jourdan,

with the army of the Moselle, directed his course towards Charleroi by

Arlon and Dinan, to join the army of the north.

The Austrians, attacked in Flanders, and threatened with a surprise in the

rear by Jourdan, soon abandoned their positions on the Somme. Clairfait

and the duke of York allowed themselves to be beaten at Courtrai and

Hooglède by the army of Pichegru; Coburg at Fleurus by that of Jourdan,

who had just taken Charleroi. The two victorious generals rapidly

completed the invasion of the Netherlands. The Anglo-Dutch army fell back

on Antwerp, and from thence upon Breda, and from Breda to Bois-le-Duc,

receiving continual checks. It crossed the Waal, and fell back upon

Holland. The Austrians endeavoured with the same want of success, to cover

Brussels and Maëstricht: they were pursued and beaten by the army of

Jourdan, which since its union had taken the name of the army of the

_Sambre et Meuse_, and which did not leave them behind the Roër, as

Dumouriez had done, but drove them beyond the Rhine. Jourdan made himself

master of Cologne and Bonn, and communicated by his left with the right of

the army of the Moselle, which had advanced into the country of

Luxembourg, and which, conjointly with him, occupied Coblentz. A general

and concerted movement of all the French armies had taken place, all of

them marching towards the Rhenish frontier. At the time of the defeats,

the lines of Weissenburg had been forced. The committee of public safety

employed in the army of the Rhine the expeditious measures peculiar to its

policy. The commissioners, Saint-Just and Lebas, gave the chief command to

Hoche, made terror and victory the order of the day; and generals

Brunswick and Wurmser were very soon driven from Haguenau on the lines of

the Lauter, and not being able even to maintain that position, passed the

Rhine at Philipsburg. Spire and Worms were retaken. The republican troops,

everywhere victorious, occupied Belgium, that part of Holland situated on

the left of the Meuse, and all the towns on the Rhine, except Mayence and

Mannheim, which were closely beset.

The army of the Alps did not make much progress in this campaign. It tried

to invade Piedmont, but failed. On the Spanish frontier, the war had

commenced under ill auspices: the two armies of the eastern and western

Pyrenees, few in number and badly disciplined, were constantly beaten; one

had retired under Perpignan, the other under Bayonne. The committee of

public safety turned its attention and efforts but tardily on this point,

which was not the most dangerous for it. But as soon as it had introduced

its system, generals, and organization into the two armies, the appearance

of things changed. Dugommier, after repeated successes, drove the

Spaniards from the French territory, and entered the peninsula by

Catalonia. Moncey also invaded it by the valley of Bastan, the other

opening of the Pyrenees, and became master of San Sebastian and

Fontarabia. The coalition was everywhere conquered, and some of the

confederated powers began to repent of their over-confident adhesion.

In the meantime, news of the revolution of the 9th Thermidor reached the

armies. They were entirely republican, and they feared that Robespierre's

fall would lead to that of the popular government; and they, accordingly,

received this intelligence with marked disapprobation; but, as the armies

were submissive to the civil authority, none of them rebelled. The

insurrections of the army only took place from the 14th of July to the

31st of May; because, being the refuge of the conquered parties, their

leaders had at every crisis the advantage of political precedence, and

contended with all the ardour of compromised factions. Under the committee

of public safety, on the contrary, the most renowned generals had no

political influence, and were subject to the terrible discipline of

parties. While occasionally thwarting the generals, the convention had no

difficulty in keeping the armies in obedience.

A short time afterwards the movement of invasion was prolonged in Holland

and in the Spanish peninsula. The United Provinces were attacked in the

middle of winter, and on several sides, by Pichegru, who summoned the

Dutch patriots to liberty. The party opposed to the stadtholderate

seconded the victorious efforts of the French army, and the revolution and

conquest took place simultaneously at Leyden, Amsterdam, the Hague, and

Utrecht. The stadtholder took refuge in England, his authority was

abolished, and the assembly of the states-general proclaimed the

sovereignty of the people, and constituted the Dutch Republic, which

formed a close alliance with France, to which it ceded, by the treaty of

Paris, of the 16th of May, 1795, Dutch Flanders, Maëstricht, Venloo, and

their dependencies. The navigation of the Rhine, the Scheldt, and the

Meuse was left free to both nations. Holland, by its wealth, powerfully

contributed towards the continuance of the war against the coalition. This

important conquest at the same time deprived the English of a powerful

support, and compelled Prussia, threatened on the Rhine and by Holland, to

conclude, at Basle, with the French Republic, a peace, for which its

reverses and the affairs of Poland had long rendered it disposed. A peace

was also made at Basle, on the 10th of July, with Spain, alarmed by our

progress on its territory. Figuières and the fortress of Rosas had been

taken; and Perignon was advancing into Catalonia; while Moncey, after

becoming master of Villa Réal, Bilbao, and Vittoria, marched against the

Spaniards who had retired to the frontiers of Old Castile. The cabinet of

Madrid demanded peace. It recognised the French Republic, which restored

its conquests, and which received in exchange the portion of San Domingo

possessed by Spain. The two disciplined armies of the Pyrenees joined the

army of the Alps, which by this means soon overran Piedmont, and entered

Italy--Tuscany only having made peace with the republic on the 9th of

February, 1795.

These partial pacifications and the reverses of the allied troops gave

another direction to the efforts of England and the emigrant party. The

time had arrived for making the interior of France the fulcrum of the

counter-revolutionary movement. In 1791, when unanimity existed in France,

the royalists placed all their hopes in foreign powers; now, dissensions

at home and the defeat of their allies in Europe left them no resource but

in conspiracies. Unsuccessful attempts, as we have seen, never make

vanquished parties despair: victory alone wearies and enervates, and

sooner or later restores the dominion of those who wait.

The events of Prairial and the defeat of the Jacobin party, had decided

the counter-revolutionary movement. At this period, the reaction, hitherto

conducted by moderate republicans, became generally royalist. The

partisans of monarchy were still as divided as they had been from the

opening of the states-general to the 10th of August. In the interior, the

old constitutionalists, who had their sittings in the sections, and who

consisted of the wealthy middle classes, had not the same views of

monarchy with the absolute royalists. They still felt the rivalry and

opposition of interest, natural to the middle against the privileged

classes. The absolute royalists themselves did not agree; the party beaten

in the interior had little sympathy with that enrolled among the armies of

Europe; but besides the divisions between the emigrants and Vendéans,

dissensions had arisen among the emigrants from the date of their

departure from France. Meantime, all these royalists of different

opinions, not having yet to contend for the reward of victory, came to an

agreement to attack the convention in common. The emigrants and the

priests, who for some months past had returned in great numbers, took the

banner of the sections, quite certain, if they carried the day by means of

the middle class, to establish their own government; for they had a

leader, and a definite object, which the sectionaries had not.

This reaction, of a new character, was restrained for some time in Paris,

where the convention, a strong and neutral power, wished to prevent the

violence and usurpation of both parties. While overthrowing the sway of

the Jacobins, it suppressed the vengeance of the royalists. Then it was

that the greater part of _la troupe dorée_ deserted its cause, that the

leaders of the sections prepared the bourgeoisie to oppose the assembly,

and that the confederation of the Journalists succeeded that of the

Jacobins. La Harpe, Richer-de-Sérizy, Poncelin, Tronçon-du-Coudray,

Marchéna, etc., became the organs of this new opinion, and were the

literary clubists. The active but irregular troops of this party assembled

at the Théâtre Feydeau. the Boulevard des Italiens, and the Palais Royal,

and began _the chase of the Jacobins_, while they sang the _Réveil du

Peuple_. The word of proscription, at that time, was Terrorist, in virtue

of which an _honest man_ might with good conscience attack a

revolutionist. The Terrorist class was extended at the will or the

passions of the new reactionaries, who wore their hair _à la victime_, and

who, no longer fearing to avow their intentions, for some time past had

adopted the Chouan uniform--a grey turned-back coat with a green or black

collar.

But this reaction was much more ardent in the departments where there was

no authority to interpose in the prevention of bloodshed. Here there were

only two parties, that which had dominated and that which had suffered

under the Mountain. The intermediate class was alternately governed by the

royalists and by the democrats. The latter, foreseeing the terrible

reprisals to which they would be subject if they fell, held out as long as

they could; but their defeat at Paris led to their downfall in the

departments. Party executions then took place, similar to those of the

proconsuls of the committee of public safety. The south was, more

especially, a prey to wholesale massacres and acts of personal vengeance.

Societies, called _Compagnies de Jésus_ and _Compagnies du Soleil_, which

were of royalists origin, were organized, and executed terrible reprisals.

At Lyons, Aix, Tarascon, and Marseilles, they slew in the prisons those

who had taken part in the preceding régime. Nearly all the south had its

2nd of September. At Lyons, after the first revolutionary massacres, the

members of the _compagnie_ hunted out those who had not been taken; and

when they met one, without any other form than the exclamation, "There's a

Matavon," (the name given to them), they slew and threw him into the

Rhone. At Tarascon, they threw them from the top of the tower on a rock on

the bank of the Rhone. During this new reign of terror, and this general

defeat of the revolutionists, England and the emigrants attempted the

daring enterprise of Quiberon.

The Vendéans were exhausted by their repeated defeats, but they were not

wholly reduced. Their losses, however, and the divisions between their

principal leaders, Charette and Stofflet, rendered them an extremely

feeble succour. Charette had even consented to treat with the republic,

and a sort of pacification had been concluded between him and the

convention at Jusnay. The marquis de Puisaye, an enterprising man, but

volatile and more capable of intrigue than of vigorous party conceptions,

intended to replace the almost expiring insurrection of La Vendée by that

of Brittany. Since the enterprise of Wimpfen, in which Puisaye had a

command, there already existed, in Calvados and Morbihan, bands of

Chouans, composed of the remains of parties, adventurers, men without

employment, and daring smugglers, who made expeditions, but were unable to

keep the field, like the Vendéans. Puisaye had recourse to England to

extend the _Chouanerie_, leading it to hope for a general rising in

Brittany, and from thence in the rest of France, if it would land the

nucleus of an army, with ammunition and guns.

The ministry of Great Britain, deceived as to the coalition, desired

nothing better than to expose the republic to fresh perils, while it

sought to revive the courage of Europe. It confided in Puisaye, and in the

spring of 1795 prepared an expedition, in which the most energetic

emigrants took a share, nearly all the officers of the former navy, and

all who, weary of the part of exiles and of the distresses of a life of

wandering, wished to try their fortunes for the last time.

The English fleet landed, on the peninsula of Quiberon, fifteen hundred

emigrants, six thousand republican prisoners who had embraced the cause of

the emigrants to return to France, sixty thousand muskets, and the full

equipment for an army of forty thousand men. Fifteen hundred Chouans

joined the army on its landing, but it was soon attacked by General Hoche.

His attack proved successful; the republican prisoners who were in the

ranks deserted, and it was defeated after a most energetic resistance. In

the mortal warfare between the emigrants and the republic, the vanquished,

being considered as _outlaws_, were mercilessly massacred. Their loss

inflicted a deep and incurable wound on the emigrant party.

The hopes founded on the victories of Europe, on the progress of

insurrection and the attempt of the emigrants, being thus overthrown,

recourse was had to the discontented sections. It was hoped to make a

counter-revolution by means of the new constitution decreed by the

convention on the 22nd of August, 1795. This constitution was, indeed, the

work of the moderate republican party; but as it restored the ascendancy

of the middle class, the royalist leaders thought that by it they might

easily enter the legislative body and the government.

This constitution was the best, the wisest, and most liberal, and the most

provident that had as yet been established or projected; it contained the

result of six years' revolutionary and legislative experience. At this

period, the convention felt the necessity of organizing power, and of

rendering the people settled, while the first assembly, from its position,

only felt the necessity of weakening royalty and agitating the nation. All

had been exhausted, from the throne to the people; existence now depended

on reconstructing and restoring order, at the same time keeping the nation

in great activity. The new constitution accomplished this. It differed but

little from that of 1791, with respect to the exercise of sovereignty; but

greatly in everything relative to government. It confided the legislative

power to two councils; that of the _Cinq-cents_ and that of the _Anciens_;

and the executive power to a directory of five members. It restored the

two degrees of elections destined to retard the popular movement, and to

lead to a more enlightened choice than immediate elections. The wise but

moderate qualifications with respect to property, required in the members

of the primary assemblies and the electoral assemblies, again conferred

political importance on the middle class, to which it became imperatively

necessary to recur after the dismissal of the multitude and the

abandonment of the constitution of '93.

In order to prevent the despotism or the servility of a single assembly,

it was necessary to place somewhere a power to check or defend it. The

division of the legislative body into two councils, which had the same

origin, the same duration, and only differed in functions, attained the

twofold object of not alarming the people by an aristocratic institution,

and of contributing to the formation of a good government. The Council of

Five Hundred, whose members were required to be thirty years old, was

alone entrusted with the initiative and the discussion of laws. The

Council of Ancients, composed of two hundred and fifty members, who had

completed their fortieth year, was charged with adopting or rejecting

them.

In order to avoid precipitation in legislative measures, and to prevent a

compulsory sanction from the Council of Ancients in a moment of popular

excitement, they could not come to a decision until after three readings,

at a distance of five days at least from each other. In _urgent cases_

this formality was dispensed with; and the council had the right of

determining such urgency. This council acted sometimes as a legislative

power, when it did not thoroughly approve a measure, and made use of the

form "_Le Conseil des Anciens ne peut pas adopter_," and sometimes as a

conservative power, when it only considered a measure in its legal

bearing, and said "_La Constitution annule_." For the first time, partial

re-elections were adopted, and the renewing of half of the council every

two years was fixed, in order to avoid that rush of legislators who came

with an immoderate desire for innovation, and suddenly changed the spirit

of an assembly.

The executive power was distinct from the councils, and no longer existed

in the committees. Monarchy was still too much feared to admit of a

president of the republic being named. They, therefore, confined

themselves to the creation of a directory of five members, nominated by

the council of ancients, at the recommendation of that of the Five

Hundred. The directors might be brought to trial by the councils, but

could not be dismissed by them. They were entrusted with a general and

independent power of execution, but it was wished also to prevent their

abusing it, and especially to guard against the danger of a long habit of

authority leading to usurpation. They had the management of the armed

force and of the finances; the nomination of functionaries, the conduct of

negotiations, but they could do nothing of themselves; they had ministers

and generals, for whose conduct they were responsible. Each member was

president for three months, holding the seals and affixing his signature.

Every year, one of the members was to go out. It will be seen by this

account that the functions of royalty as they were in 1791, were shared by

the council of ancients, who had the _veto_, and the directory, which held

the executive power. The directory had a guard, a national palace, the

Luxembourg, for a residence, and a kind of civil list. The council of the

ancients, destined to check the encroachments of the legislative power,

was invested with the means of restraining the usurpations of the

directory; it could change the residence of the councils and of the

government.

The foresight of this constitution was infinite: it prevented popular

violence, the encroachments of power, and provided for all the perils

which the different crises of the revolution had displayed. If any

constitution could have become firmly established at that period, it was

the directorial constitution. It restored authority, granted liberty, and

offered the different parties an opportunity of peace, if each, sincerely

renouncing exclusive dominion, and satisfied with the common right, would

have taken its proper place in the state. But it did not last longer than

the others, because it could not establish legal order in spite of

parties. Each of them aspired to the government, in order to make its

system and its interests prevail, and instead of the reign of law, it was

still necessary to relapse into that of force, and of coups-d'état. When

parties do not wish to terminate a revolution--and those who do not

dominate never wish to terminate it--a constitution, however excellent it

may be, cannot accomplish it.

The members of the Commission of Eleven, who, previously to the events of

Prairial, had no other mission than to prepare the organic laws of the

constitution of '93, and who, after those events, made the constitution of

the year III., were at the head of the conventional party. This party

neither belonged to the old Gironde nor to the old Mountain. Neutral up to

the 31st of May, subject till the 9th Thermidor, it had been in the

possession of power since that period, because the twofold defeat of the

Girondists and the Mountain had left it the strongest. The men of the

extreme sides, who had begun the fusion of parties, joined it. Merlin de

Douai represented the party of that mass which had yielded to

circumstances, Thibaudeau, the party that continued inactive, and Daunou,

the courageous party. The latter had declared himself opposed to all

coups-d'état, ever since the opening of the assembly, both the 21st of

January, and to the 31st of May, because he wished for the régime of the

convention, without party violence and measures. After the 9th Thermidor,

he blamed the fury displayed towards the chiefs of the revolutionary

government, whose victim he had been, as one of the _seventy-three_. He

had obtained great ascendancy, as men gradually approached towards a legal

system. His enlightened attachment to the revolution, his noble

independence, the solidity and extent of his ideas, and his imperturbable

fortitude, rendered him one of the most influential actors of this period.

He was the chief author of the constitution of the year III., and the

convention deputed him, with some others of its members, to undertake the

defence of the republic, during the crisis of Vendémiaire.

The reaction gradually increased; it was indirectly favoured by the

members of the Right, who, since the opening of that assembly, had only

been incidentally republican. They were not prepared to repel the attacks

of the royalists with the same energy as that of the revolutionists. Among

this number were Boissy d'Anglas, Lanjuinais, Henri La Rivière, Saladin,

Aubry, etc.; they formed in the assembly the nucleus of the sectionary

party. Old and ardent members of the Mountain, such as Rovère, Bourdon de

l'Oise, etc., carried away by the counter-revolutionary movement, suffered

the reaction to be prolonged, doubtless in order to make their peace with

those whom they had so violently combated.

But the conventional party, reassured with respect to the democrats, set

itself to prevent the triumph of the royalists. It felt that the safety of

the republic depended on the formation of the councils, and that the

councils being elected by the middle class, which was directed by

royalists, would be composed on counter-revolutionary principles. It was

important to entrust the guardianship of the régime they were about to

establish to those who had an interest in defending it. In order to avoid

the error of the constituent assembly, which had excluded itself from the

legislature that succeeded it, the convention decided by a decree, that

two-thirds of its members should be re-elected. By this means it secured

the majority of the councils and the nomination of the directory; it could

accompany its constitution into the state, and consolidate it without

violence. This re-election of two-thirds was not exactly legal, but it was

politic, and the only means of saving France from the rule of the

democrats or counter-revolutionists. The convention granted itself a

moderate dictatorship, by the decrees of the 5th and 13th Fructidor (22nd

and 30th of August, 1795), one of which established the re-election, and

the other fixed the manner of it. But these two exceptional decrees were

submitted to the ratification of the primary assemblies, at the same time

as the constitutional act.

The royalist party was taken by surprise by the decrees of Fructidor. It

hoped to form part of the government by the councils, of the councils by

elections, and to effect a change of system when once in power. It

inveighed against the convention. The royalist committee of Paris, whose

agent was an obscure man, named Lemaître, the journalists, and the leaders

of the sections coalesced. They had no difficulty in securing the support

of public opinion, of which they were the only organs; they accused the

convention of perpetuating its power, and of assailing the sovereignty of

the people. The chief advocates of the two-thirds, Louvet, Daunou, and

Chénier, were not spared, and every preparation was made for a grand

movement. The Faubourg Saint Germain, lately almost deserted, gradually

filled; emigrants flocked in, and the conspirators, scarcely concealing

their plans, adopted the Chouan uniform.

The convention, perceiving the storm increase, sought support in the army,

which, at that time, was the republican class, and a camp was formed at

Paris. The people had been disbanded, and the royalists had secured the

bourgeoisie. In the meantime, the primary assemblies met on the 20th

Fructidor, to deliberate on the constitutional act, and the decrees of the

two-thirds, which were to be accepted or rejected together. The

Lepelletier section (formerly Filles Saint Thomas) was the centre of all

the others. On a motion made by that section, it was decided that the

power of all constituent authority ceased in the presence of the assembled

people. The Lepelletier section, directed by Richer-Sérizy, La Harpe,

Lacretelle junior, Vaublanc, etc., turned its attention to the

organization of the insurrectional government, under the name of the

central committee. This committee was to replace in Vendémiaire, against

the convention, the committee of the 10th of August against the throne,

and of the 31st of May against the Girondists. The majority of the

sections adopted this measure, which was annulled by the convention, whose

decree was in its turn rejected by the majority of the sections. The

struggle now became open; and in Paris they separated the constitutional

act, which was adopted, from the decrees of re-election, which were

rejected.

On the 1st Vendémiaire, the convention proclaimed the acceptance of the

decrees by the greater number of the primary assemblies of France. The

sections assembled again to nominate the electors who were to choose the

members of the legislature. On the 10th they determined that the electors

should assemble in the Théâtre Français (it was then on the other side of

the bridges); that they should be accompanied there by the armed force of

the sections, after having sworn to defend them till death. On the 11th,

accordingly, the electors assembled under the presidency of the duc de

Nivernois, and the guard of some detachments of chasseurs and grenadiers.

The convention, apprised of the danger, sat permanently, stationed round

its place of sitting the troops of the camp of Sablons, and concentrated

its powers in a committee of five members, who were entrusted with all

measures of public safety. These members were Colombel, Barras, Daunou,

Letourneur, and Merlin de Douai. For some time the revolutionists had

ceased to be feared, and all had been liberated who had been imprisoned

for the events of Prairial. They enrolled, under the name of _Battalion of

Patriots of '89_, about fifteen or eighteen hundred of them, who had been

proceeded against, in the departments or in Paris, by the friends of the

reaction. In the evening of the 11th, the convention sent to dissolve the

assembly of electors by force, but they had already adjourned to the

following day.

During the night of the 11th, the decree which dissolved the college of

electors, and which armed the battalion of patriots of '89, caused the

greatest agitation. Drums beat to arms; the Lepelletier section declaimed

against the despotism of the convention, against the return of the _Reign

of Terror_, and during the whole of the 12th prepared the other sections

for the contest. In the evening, the convention, scarcely less agitated,

decided on taking the initiative, by surrounding the conspiring section,

and terminating the crisis by disarming it. Menou, general of the

interior, and Laporte the representative, were entrusted with this

mission. The convent of the Filles Saint Thomas was the headquarters of

the sectionaries, before which they had seven or eight hundred men in

battle array. These were surrounded by superior forces, from the

Boulevards on each side, and the Rue Vivienne opposite. Instead of

disarming them, the leaders of the expedition began to parley. Both

parties agreed to withdraw; but the conventional troops had no sooner

retired than the sectionaries returned reinforced. This was a complete

victory for them, which being exaggerated in Paris, as such things always

are, increased their number, and gave them courage to attack the

convention the next day.

About eleven at night the convention learned the issue of the expedition

and the dangerous effect which it had produced; it immediately dismissed

Menou, and gave the command of the armed force to Barras, the general in

command on the 9th Thermidor. Barras asked the committee of five to

appoint as his second in command, a young officer who had distinguished

himself at the siege of Toulon, but had been dismissed by Aubry of the

reaction party; a young man of talent and resolution, calculated to do

good service to the republic in a moment of peril. This young officer was

Bonaparte. He appeared before the committee, but there was nothing in his

appearance that announced his astonishing destiny. Not a man of party,

summoned for the first time to this great scene of action, his demeanour

exhibited a timidity and a want of assurance, which disappeared entirely

in the preparations for battle, and in the heat of action. He immediately

sent for the artillery of the camp of Sablons, and disposed them, with the

five thousand men of the conventional army, on all the points from which

the convention could be assailed. At noon on the 13th Vendémiaire, the

enclosure of the convention had the appearance of a fortified place, which

could only be taken by assault. The line of defence extended, on the left

side of the Tuileries along the river, from the Pont Neuf to the Pont

Louis XV.; on the right, in all the small streets opening on the Rue Saint

Honoré, from the Rues de Rohan, de l'Échelle and the Cul-de-sac Dauphin,

to the Place de la Révolution. In front, the Louvre, the Jardin de

l'Infante, and the Carrousel were planted with cannon; and behind, the

Pont Tournant and the Place de la Révolution formed a park of reserve. In

this position the convention awaited the insurgents.

The latter soon encompassed it on several points. They had about forty

thousand men under arms, commanded by generals Danican, Duhoux, and the

ex-garde-du-corps Lafond. The thirty-two sections which formed the

majority, had supplied their military contingent. Of the other sixteen,

several sections of the faubourgs had their troops in the battalion of

'89. A few, those of the Quinze-vingts and Montreuil, sent assistance

during the action; others, though favourably disposed, as that of

Popincourt, could not do so; and lastly, others remained neutral, like

that of L'Indivisibilité. From two to three o'clock, general Carteaux, who

occupied the Pont Neuf with four hundred men and two four-pounders, was

surrounded by several columns of sectionaries, who obliged him to retire

on the Louvre. This advantage emboldened the insurgents, who were strong

on all points. General Danican summoned the convention to withdraw its

troops, and disarm the terrorists. The officer entrusted with the summons

was led into the assembly blindfold, and his message occasioned some

agitation, several members declaring in favour of conciliatory measures.

Boissy d'Anglas advised a conference with Danican; Gamon proposed a

proclamation in which they should call upon the citizens to retire,

promising then to disarm the battalion of '89. This address excited

violent murmurs. Chénier rushed to the tribune. "I am surprised," said he,

"that the demands of sections in a state of revolt should be discussed

here. Negotiation must not be heard of; there is only victory or death for

the national convention." Lanjuinais wished to support the address, by

dwelling on the danger and misery of civil war; but the convention would

not hear him, and on the motion of Fermond, passed to the order of the

day. The debates respecting measures of peace or war with the sections

were continued for some time, when, about half-past four several

discharges of musketry were heard, which put an end to all discussion.

Seven hundred guns were brought in, and the convention took arms as a body

of reserve.

The conflict had now commenced in the Rue Saint Honoré, of which the

insurgents were masters. The first shots were fired from the Hôtel de

Noailles, and a murderous fire extended the whole length of this line. A

few moments after, on the other side, two columns of sectionaries, about

four thousand strong, commanded by the count de Maulevrier, advanced by

the quays, and attacked the Pont Royal. The action then became general,

but it could not last long; the place was too well defended to be taken by

assault. After an hour's fighting, the sectionaries were driven from Saint

Roch and Rue Saint Honoré, by the cannon of the convention and the

battalion of patriots. The column of the Pont Royal received three

discharges of artillery in front and on the side, from the bridge and the

quays, which put it entirely to flight. At seven o'clock the conventional

troops, victorious on all sides, took the offensive; by nine o'clock they

had dislodged the sectionaries from the Théâtre de la République and the

posts they still occupied in the neighbourhood of the Palais Royal. They

prepared to make barricades during the night, and several volleys were

fired in the Rue de la Loi (Richelieu), to prevent the works. The next

day, the 14th, the troops of the convention disarmed the Lepelletier

section, and compelled the others to return to order.

The assembly, which had only fought in its own defence, displayed much

moderation. The 13th Vendémiaire was the 10th of August of the royalists

against the republic, except that the convention resisted the bourgeoisie

much better than the throne resisted the faubourgs. The position of France

contributed very much to this victory. Men now wished for a republic

without a revolutionary government, a moderate regime without a counter-

revolution. The convention, which was a mediatory power, pronounced alike

against the exclusive domination of the lower class, which it had thrown

off in Prairial, and the reactionary domination of the bourgeoisie, which

it repelled in Vendémiaire, seemed alone capable of satisfying this

twofold want, and of putting an end to the state of warfare between the

two parties, which was prolonged by their alternate entrance into the

government. This situation, as well as its own dangers, gave it courage to

resist, and secured its triumph. The sections could not take it by

surprise, and still less by assault.

After the events of Vendémiaire, the convention occupied itself with

forming the councils and the directory. The third part, freely elected,

had been favourable to reaction. A few conventionalists, headed by

Tallien, proposed to annul the elections of this _third_, and wished to

suspend, for a longer time, the conventional government. Thibaudeau

exposed their design with much courage and eloquence. The whole

conventional party adopted his opinion. It rejected all superfluous

arbitrary sway, and showed itself impatient to leave the provisional state

it had been in for the last three years. The convention established itself

as a _national electoral assembly_, in order to complete the _two-thirds_

from among its members. It then formed the councils; that of the

_Ancients_ of two hundred and fifty members, who according to the new law

had completed forty years; that of _The Five Hundred_ from among the

others. The councils met in the Tuileries. They then proceeded to form the

government.

The attack of Vendémiaire was quite recent; and the republican party,

especially dreading the counter-revolution, agreed to choose the directors

only, from the conventionalists, and further from among those of them who

had voted for the death of the king. Some of the most influential members,

among whom was Daunou, opposed this view, which restricted the choice, and

continued to give the government a dictatorial and revolutionary

character; but it prevailed. The conventionalists thus elected were La

Réveillère-Lépaux, invested with general confidence on account of his

courageous conduct on the 31st of May, for his probity and his moderation;

Sieyès, the man who of all others enjoyed the greatest celebrity of the

day; Rewbell, possessed of great administrative activity; Letourneur, one

of the members of the commission of five during the last crisis; and

Barras, chosen for his two pieces of good fortune of Thermidor and

Vendémiaire. Sieyès, who had refused to take part in the legislative

commission _of the eleven_, also refused to enter upon the directory. It

is difficult to say whether this reluctance arose from calculation or an

insurmountable antipathy for Rewbell. He was replaced by Carnot, the only

member of the former committee whom they were disposed to favour, on

account of his political purity, and his great share in the victories of

the republic. Such was the first composition of the directory. On the 4th

Brumaire, the convention passed a law of amnesty, in order to enter on

legal government; changed the name of the Place de la Révolution into

Place de la Concorde, and declared its session closed.

The convention lasted three years, from the 21st of September, 1792, to

October 26, 1795 (4th Brumaire, year IV.). It took several directions.

During the six first months of its existence it was drawn into the

struggle which arose between the legal party of the Gironde, and the

revolutionary party of the Mountain. The latter had the lead from the 31st

of May, 1793, to the 9th Thermidor, year II. (26th July, 1794). The

convention then obeyed the committee of public safety, which first

destroyed its old allies of the commune and of the Mountain, and

afterwards perished through its own divisions. From the 9th Thermidor to

the month of Brumaire, year IV., the convention conquered the

revolutionary and royalist parties, and sought to establish a moderate

republic in opposition to both.

During this long and terrible period, the violence of the situation

changed the revolution into a war, and the assembly into a field of

battle. Each party wished to establish its sway by victory, and to secure

it by founding its system. The Girondist party made the attempt, and

perished; the Mountain made the attempt, and perished; the party of the

commune made the attempt, and perished; Robespierre's party made the

attempt, and perished. They could only conquer, they were unable to found

a system. The property of such a storm was to overthrow everything that

attempted to become settled. All was provisional; dominion, men, parties,

and systems, because the only thing real and possible was--war. A year was

necessary to enable the conventional party, on its return to power, to

restore the revolution to a legal position; and it could only accomplish

this by two victories--that of Prairial and that of Vendémiaire. But the

convention having then returned to the point whence it started, and having

discharged its true mission, which was to establish the republic after

having defended it, disappeared from the theatre of the world which it had

filled with surprise. A revolutionary power, it ceased as soon as legal

order recommenced. Three years of dictatorship had been lost to liberty

but not to the revolution.

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORY

History of the French Revolution from 1789 to 1814 · 第 12 / 16 章