VI.

The removal of the contradiction between life and consciousness

is possible in two ways,--by a change of life or by a change of

consciousness, and in the choice of one of the two there can be no

doubt.

A man may stop doing what he considers bad, but he cannot stop

considering bad what is bad.

Even so the whole of humanity may stop doing what it considers bad,

but is powerless, not only to change, but even for a time to retard

the all-elucidating and expanding consciousness of what is bad and

what, therefore, ought not to be. It would seem that the choice

between the change of life and that of the consciousness ought to be

clear and above doubt.

And so, it would seem, it is indispensable for the Christian

humanity of our time to renounce the pagan forms of life, which it

condemns, and to build up its life on the Christian foundations,

which it professes.

But so it would be, if there did not exist the law of inertia, which

is as invariable in the lives of men and nations as in inanimate

bodies, and which is for men expressed by the psychological law, so

well stated in the Gospel with the words, "and did not walk toward

the light, because their deeds were evil." This law consists in

this, that the majority of men do not think in order to know the

truth, but in order to assure themselves that the life which they

lead, and which is agreeable and habitual to them, is the one which

coincides with the truth.

Slavery was contrary to all the moral principles which were preached

by Plato and Aristotle, and yet neither the one nor the other saw

this, because the negation of slavery destroyed all that life which

they lived. The same happens in our world.

The division of men into two castes, like the violence of the state

and of the army, is repugnant to all those moral principles by which

our world lives, and at the same time the leading men of culture of

our time do not seem to see it.

The majority, if not all, of the cultured people of our time

unconsciously try to maintain the previous social concept of life

which justifies their position, and to conceal from themselves

and from men its inadequacy, and, above all, the necessity of the

condition of the Christian life-conception, which destroys the whole

structure of the existing life. They strive to maintain the orders

that are based on the social life-conception, but themselves do

not believe in it, because it is obsolete, and it is impossible to

believe in it any longer.

All literature, the philosophic, the political, and that of the

_belles-lettres_, of our time is striking in this respect. What a

wealth of ideas, forms, colours, what erudition, elegance, abundance

of thoughts, and what total absence of serious contents, and even

what fear of every definiteness of thought and of its expression!

Circumlocutions, allegories, jests, general, extremely broad

reflections, and nothing simple, clear, pertinent to the matter,

that is, to the question of life.

But it is not enough that they write and say graceful vapidities;

they even write and say abominable, vile things, they in the most

refined manner adduce reflections which take men back to primeval

savagery, to the foundations, not only of pagan, but even of animal

life, which we outlived as far back as five thousand years ago.

It can, indeed, not be otherwise. In keeping shy of the Christian

life-conception, which for some impairs only the habitual order, and

for others both the habitual and the advantageous order, men cannot

help but return to the pagan concept of life, and to the teachings

which are based on them. In our time they not only preach patriotism

and aristocratism, as it was preached two thousand years ago, but

they even preach the coarsest epicurism, animality, with this one

difference, that the men who then preached it believed in what they

preached, while now the preachers themselves do not believe in what

they say, and they cannot believe, because what they preach no

longer has any meaning. It is impossible to remain in one place,

when the soil is in motion. If you do not go ahead, you fall behind.

And, though it is strange and terrible to say so, the cultured

people of our time, the leaders, with their refined reflections, in

reality are dragging society back, not even to the pagan state, but

to the state of primeval savagery.

In nothing may this direction of the activity of the leading men of

our time be seen so clearly as in their relation to the phenomenon

in which in our time the whole inadequacy of the social concept of

life has been expressed in a concentrated form,--in their relation

to war, to universal armaments, and to universal military service.

The indefiniteness, if not the insincerity, of the relation of

the cultured men of our time to this phenomenon is striking. The

relation to this matter in our cultured society is threefold: some

look upon this phenomenon as something accidental, which arose

from the peculiar political condition of Europe, and consider it

corrigible, without the change of the whole structure of life, by

means of external, diplomatic, international measures; others look

upon this phenomenon as upon something terrible and cruel, but

inevitable and fatal, like a disease or death; others again calmly

and coolly look upon war as an indispensable, beneficent, and

therefore desirable phenomenon.

These people look differently at the matter, but all of them

discuss war as an incident which is quite independent of the will

of men who take part in it, and so do not even admit that natural

question, which presents itself to every simple man, "Must I take

part in it?" According to the opinion of all these men, these

questions do not even exist, and every person, no matter how he

himself may look upon war, must in this respect slavishly submit to

the demands of the government.

The relation of the first, of those who see a salvation from wars in

diplomatic, international measures, is beautifully expressed in the

result of the last Congress of Peace in London, and in an article

and letters concerning war by prominent authors in No. 8 of the

_Revue des Revues_ for 1891.

Here are the results of the Congress: having collected the personal

or written opinions from learned men all over the world, the

Congress began by a Te Deum in the Cathedral, and ended with a

dinner with speeches, having for the period of five days listened

to a large number of speeches, and having arrived at the following

resolutions:

1. "The Congress affirms its belief that the brotherhood of man

involves as a necessary consequence a brotherhood of nations, in

which the true interests of all are acknowledged to be identical.

2. "The Congress recognizes the important influence which

Christianity exercises upon the moral and political progress of

mankind, and earnestly urges upon ministers of the Gospel, and other

teachers of religion and morality, the duty of setting forth the

principles of Peace and Good-will, and recommends that the third

Sunday in December in each year be set apart for that purpose.

3. "This Congress expresses its opinion that all teachers of history

should call the attention of the young to the grave evils inflicted

on mankind in all ages by war, and to the fact that such war has

been waged, as a rule, for most inadequate causes.

4. "The Congress protests against the use of military exercises

in connection with the physical exercises of school, and suggests

the formation of brigades for saving life rather than any of

a quasi-military character; and it urges the desirability of

impressing on the Board of Examiners, who formulate the questions

for examination, the propriety of guiding the minds of children into

the principles of Peace.

5. "The Congress holds that the doctrine of the universal rights

of man requires that aboriginal and weaker races shall be guarded

from injustice and fraud when brought into contact with civilized

peoples, alike as to their territories, their liberties, and their

property, and that they shall be shielded from the vices which are

so prevalent among the so-called advanced races of men. It further

expresses its conviction that there should be concert of action

among the nations for the accomplishment of these ends. The Congress

desires to express its hearty appreciation of the conclusions

arrived at by the late Anti-Slavery Conference, held in Brussels,

for the amelioration of the condition of the peoples of Africa.

6. "The Congress believes that the warlike prejudices and traditions

which are still fostered in the various nationalities, and the

misrepresentations by leaders of public opinion in legislative

assemblies, or through the press, are not infrequently indirect

causes of war. The Congress is therefore of opinion that these evils

should be counteracted by the publication of accurate statements

and information that would tend to the removal of misunderstanding

among nations, and recommends to the Inter-Parliamentary Committee

the importance of considering the question of commencing an

international newspaper, which should have such a purpose as one of

its primary objects.

7. "The Congress proposes to the Inter-Parliamentary Conference

that the utmost support should be given to every project for the

unification of weights and measures, of coinage, tariffs, postal

and telegraphic arrangements, means of transport, etc., which would

assist in constituting a commercial, industrial, and scientific

union of the peoples.

8. "The Congress, in view of the vast moral and social influence

of woman, urges upon every woman throughout the world to sustain

the things that make for peace; as otherwise she incurs grave

responsibilities for the continuance of the systems of war and

militarism.

9. "This Congress expresses the hope that the Financial Reform

Association, and other Similar Societies in Europe and America,

should unite in convoking at an early date a Conference to consider

the best means of establishing equitable commercial relations

between states by the reduction of import duties. The Congress feels

that it can affirm that the whole of Europe desires Peace, and is

impatiently waiting for the moment when it shall see the end of

those crushing armaments which, under the plea of defence, become in

their turn a danger, by keeping alive mutual distrust, and are at

the same time the cause of that economic disturbance which stands in

the way of settling in a satisfactory manner the problems of labour

and poverty, which should take precedence of all others.

10. "The Congress, recognizing that a general disarmament would be

the best guarantee of Peace, and would lead to the solution, in the

general interest, of those questions which must now divide states,

expresses the wish that a Congress of Representatives of all the

states of Europe may be assembled as soon as possible, to consider

the means of accepting a gradual general disarmament.

11. "The Congress, considering the timidity of the single Powers

or other causes might delay indefinitely the convocation of the

above-mentioned Congress, is of opinion that the Government which

should first dismiss any considerable number of soldiers would

confer a signal benefit on Europe and mankind, because it would

oblige other Governments, urged on by public opinion, to follow its

example, and by the moral force of this accomplished fact, would

have increased rather than diminished the condition of its national

defence.

12. "This Congress, considering the question of disarmament, as

well as the Peace question generally, depends upon public opinion,

recommends the Peace Societies here represented, and all friends of

Peace, to carry on an active propaganda among the people, especially

at the time of Parliamentary elections, in order that the electors

should give their vote to those candidates who have included in

their programme Peace, Disarmament, and Arbitration.

13. "The Congress congratulates the friends of Peace on the

resolution adopted by the International American Conference

at Washington in April last, by which it was recommended that

arbitration should be obligatory in all controversies concerning

diplomatic and consular privileges, boundaries, territories,

indemnities, right of navigation, and the validity, construction,

and enforcement of treaties, and in all other cases, whatever

their origin, nature, or occasion, except only those which, in the

judgment of any of the nations involved in the controversy, may

imperil its independence.

14. "The Congress respectfully recommends this resolution to the

attention of the statesmen of Europe, and expresses the ardent

desire that treaties in similar terms be speedily entered into

between the other nations of the world.

15. "The Congress expresses its satisfaction at the adoption

by the Spanish Senate, on June 16th last, of a project of law

authorizing the Government to negotiate general or special treaties

of arbitration for the settlement of all disputes, except those

relating to the independence and internal government of the state

affected; also at the adoption of resolutions to a like effect by

the Norwegian Storthing, and by the Italian Chamber, on July 11th.

16. "The Congress addresses official communications to the principal

religious, political, commercial, labour, and peace organizations

in civilized countries, requesting them to send petitions to

governmental authorities of their respective countries, praying

that measures be taken for the formation of suitable tribunals for

the adjudicature of any international questions, so as to avoid the

resort to war.

17. "Seeing (_a_) that the object pursued by all Peace Societies is

the establishment of juridical order between nations; (_b_) that

neutralization by international treaties constitutes a step toward

this juridical state, and lessens the number of districts in which

war can be carried on; the Congress recommends a larger extension

of the rule of neutralization, and expresses the wish: (_a_) that

all treaties which at present assure to a certain state the benefit

of neutrality remain in force, or, if necessary, be amended in a

manner to render the neutrality more effective, either by extending

neutralization to the whole of the state, of which a part only may

be neutralized, or by ordering the demolition of fortresses which

constitute rather a peril than a guarantee of neutrality; (_b_) that

new treaties, provided they are in harmony with the wishes of the

population, be concluded for the establishment of the neutralization

of other states.

The Kingdom of God is Within You / Christianity and Patriotism / Miscellanies · 第 30 / 79 题