He said a lot more about the carter, and the carter's family for some

generations back, and the carter's prospects in the future life. Binks

is not exactly a cussing man, but he gave a very fair imitation of

one--it would do till a real cusser came around.

We heard him, but we heeded not. We just lay there and smiled blandly

at the Milky Way. We had reached the point where we didn't care a darn

if the race of carters became utterly extinct, and we were extinguished

with them. All we wanted was to be left alone.

Binks, however, was indomitable. That man's energy was positively

terrifying. He got us on our feet, put our coat on us in spite of our

feeble resistance, stuck one end of that fatal saw in our hand, and

dragged us two miles or more through the bush and the darkness to the

street-car. With the help of the conductor he lifted us on and propped

us up in the end of a seat. We remember that we moaned when they took

the handle of the saw away from us. We had grown attached to it.

We don't recall much about the trip on the car, except hearing the

conductor tell Binks that people who couldn't carry liquor any better

than we seemed able to do shouldn't be allowed to have any. He said

that sort of thing was what started Prohibition movements. And Binks

agreed with him!

When we got to Bink's house, the dinner had long since been burned to a

crisp, and Mrs. Binks registered about six hundred pounds pressure on

her temper-gauge. It was a terrible meal. We don't remember what we

ate, or whether we ate at all. All we know is that when it was over, we

stumbled right over to our hat and then back to Mrs. Binks.

"Goo' night--lovely time," we said. "Hope you're the same!"

Binks saw us to the door. As a matter of fact, we had started to walk

into the fire-place. He seemed to feel the need of some explanation.

"Sorry, old man, about that infernal carter," he said, "but tell you

what we'll do. Some day next week we'll stroll out to the lot and have

the fun of loading up, and then...."

We are not quite clear what it was that we said to Binks, but we must

have said something fairly significant, for neither Binks nor his wife

has spoken to us since.

Of course, we are sorry that Binks and his wife feel that way about it.

But after all the first law of life is self-preservation, and we can't

afford to run that sort of risk again. We didn't heal up for a week or

more after that dreadful grapple with the cross-cut saw. In fact, we

had some notion of going to a surgeon and having the bites cauterized.

Even this was nothing to the soreness in our legs and arms and the

famous "back-muscles" that Binks brought into play. We spent all our

evenings for the next fortnight rubbing arnica into them--also a

wonderful liniment which our landlady gave us. It must have been a fine

liniment for it smelled so strong that people turned around and looked

after us on the street, as if they thought we ought to be quarantined

and were in two minds about calling a policeman. And we didn't dare

visit our friends. But then what's the use of going to see a lady if

you moan in pain every time you try to put your arm around--well, around

the back of the chair?

[Illustration: REFRESHMENTS AT FIVE]

*Refreshments at Five*

Five o'clock appears to be a very critical time in the day. On the

manner in which the next three-quarters of an hour are spent may depend

one's well-being and good temper for the rest of the day and the evening

and possibly the first couple of hours of the morrow.

Some people--low persons who need the money or whose bosses will not

permit them to leave the office--make a habit of working through till

six, or whatever time it is that they punch the clock and go home in a

street-car strap. Naturally such persons have no place in an article of

this character.

To sensitive and cultured people who have spent the afternoon playing

bridge or in the cellar brewing the family liquor--that, we believe, is

the intellectual pastime of the moment--or in mahogany-furnished offices

persuading innocent folk with money to buy Nicaragua banana-lands or

bunk stocks on punk margins, five o'clock is the blessed hour of

surcease and repose. It is balm in Gilead, cool rains after the heat of

the day, a friendly hotel after walking across a "dry" county, divorce

after--oh, g'wan and make your own metaphors!

Personally we are an ardent and determined five-o'clocker. We have

played it every way there is--straight, for place, for show, and across

the board. There is no kind of five-o'clock performance--in accordance,

that is, with the purity and piety of our character and upbringing--that

we have not done or witnessed. We have attended teas of every

description and shade of color, pink, yellow, mauve, and with dashes of

cerise. We have gone to the tango kind, and to those discreet teas in

sequestered corners of tea-rooms to which one conducts fair students of

the drama after the matinee.

In older and perhaps happier--certainly freer--days, we were a frequent

guest and occasional host at little informal five-o'clock functions,

where one inquired of the rest of the company what they were having and

requested the attendant to "fill 'em up again, Jawn!" We attended such

functions in clubs, cafes, and those democratic places of resort which

were entered by swinging doors--up to eleven on ordinary nights and

seven on Saturdays. And we did this as part of that systematic study of

humanity--including the things they eat and the drinks they drink--which

is recommended so earnestly by the philosophers.

All this is by way of letting the reader see how thoroughly qualified we

are by nature and training to write on this important subject of

five-o'clock refreshments. We say "important" advisedly and with no

ironic intent. We have devoted to the question of how best to spend the

time between five and a quarter to six much time, energy, and serious

thought--not without considerable difficulty and several vigorous rows

with persons we have at various times consented to work for. And, as a

result of our studies, we are convinced that rest and refreshment at

five are a human necessity, whether you take it with two lumps or with

soda, and whether you eat out of the "curate" or off the free-lunch

counter.

Of course, this whole institution of five-o'clock refreshment is an

intensely modern and hyper-civilized development--at least, here in

Canada. It represents a reaction from the nerve-stresses of up-to-date

urban existence. Our sturdy forefathers knew it not, and verily there

are still many places where people do not practice it. Farmers as a

class, for instance, have still maintained their ancient prejudice

against eating and drinking till it is too dark or the weather is too

bad to do anything else.

Naturally there would have been something absurdly incongruous in our

great-grandfathers stopping in the midst of shooting bears or Indians or

burning out a clearing, in order to tramp back to the log-cabin for a

pimento sandwich or a cup or two of oolong. But, even at that, we would

hate to believe that the old boys didn't occasionally knock off for a

few minutes about five, and drag the old cider-jug from its place of

concealment in a hollow stump, and have a pull or two at the juice that

cheers and eke inebriates--if it is "hard" enough.

Five-o'clock refreshments, however, as we know them, are a peculiarly

modern institution. We got the habit from England, where we get our

spats and our knighthoods, our green hats and our Governors-General. In

England they all do it, and it won't be long before we are all doing it,

too. Talk about the effects of the War on our soldiers!--if you could

see the splendid fellows now pouring their own in the tea-rooms, you

would fear the worst.

A friend of ours who occasionally--and even oftener if things are slow

at home--takes a run over to London to refresh his accent and to study

life in its more dignified and also its lighter phases, has told us of a

visit he paid to a great English factory. As he was being shown over

the plant by the owner--jolly old dog, too, egad!--a gong sounded

suddenly. Everybody instantly dropped their tools and climbed down from

their machines; a gang of waiters burst upon the scene carrying huge

trays of steaming cups with two little crackers on the side of each

saucer; and everybody had tea. Even the boss, just to show what a

democratic old cuss he was, had a cup with the rest--the clawsses

drinking with the mawsses, so to speak.

Once in our journalistic youth--we felt about a hundred and eighty in

experience of life--we had occasion (meaning we were sent by a profane

and peremptory city editor) to interview the heads of a great business

corporation regarding the financial situation. It was a time of panic,

and this particular concern was reported to be in a bad way. A heavy

sense of responsibility weighed upon us as we loosed our pencil in its

patent sheath, and entered the office of the two brothers who directed

the destinies of the company.

They were at tea! A fat, perspiring waiter--why do waiters always

perspire?--had just carried in from a neighboring cafe a large tray

bearing a tea-pot, a jug of hot water, plate of sandwiches, ditto of

cute little cakes, and all the various accessories of tea-making and

drinking. Our heart sank. We felt that this particular company was

doomed. It wouldn't have been a greater shock to us if we had

discovered them playing marbles--in fact, we would have been more likely

to regard marbles as an amiable eccentricity.

They hospitably insisted that we should join them, but we declined with

decision. We felt as if we had been invited to take out our sewing and

while away a pleasant hour with the rest of the girls doing embroidery

and eating marshmallows. But our contempt for these particular gentlemen

was slightly modified by their producing cigarettes--very good

cigarettes, too--after tea and lighting up. Naturally we joined in

that. And our feelings were changed to something like genuine respect

when we discovered what rattling good "copy" they could talk. Oh, they

weathered the financial gale all right, in spite of the tea. And the

experience made us more tolerant of the vice.

As for the ordinary sort of pink tea--you know the kind of thing where

the dear boys in morning-coats pass the vittles to the dear girls in

feathers and a string of beads--we are a hardened and weary veteran. We

used to be one of the best young amateur waiters you ever saw, and could

juggle a "curate" with a grace and efficiency that would have been the

despair of Beau Brummel, if he had survived to witness it. But never

again!

Incidentally, why are those three-storey arrangements called "curates?"

Is it because they are always planted among the girls? Or because

social events are not really respectable without one around? Or is it

simply because they can hold so much cake?

Whatever the reason for the name, we became an out-and-out expert at

wielding the things. Handing cups of tea with the right hand, and with

the left dealing from the top or bottom deck of the "curate" with equal

ease, we must have been a genteelly inspiring sight. But we have no joy

of the recollection. Think of a healthy man spending his time like

that!

Of course, we still go to teas occasionally--even the most fertile and

mendacious excuser is sometimes caught without an alibi. Not that these

social evasions are lies exactly, but you know the way one says: "Next

Thursday did you say, my dear? So good of you, and I would just love

to, but I'm all filled up for next Thursday," etc., etc. And being "all

filled up," naturally one cannot be expected to fill up any more. But

sometimes it is not so easy to get out of it, and we are occasionally

caught by a sudden flank attack. But we are never a willing prisoner--we

go down fighting desperately to the last.

As a matter of fact, teas long ago ceased to hold any delight for us.

Like Martha we chose the worser part; but this was back in the wicked

days before Prohibition descended on us all like a bomb from a Zeppelin.

Every now and then--not every day, for we were not unabashed in our

delinquency--a friend or two would drop in about five. We would discuss

the weather in a dispassionate and scientific manner, as well as the

Mexican situation--it was the only war on at the time--and the prospects

for the baseball or hockey championship, according to the time of year.

We talked of many things, but all in the same cool and detached way, as

of men whose minds were elsewhere and busy with more vital matters.

Then suddenly we would all rise up as one man and go silently away to a

place we wotted of, where the clerk knew us by name, and asked us if we

were having "the same old poison." Or better still, he would nod in a

friendly way and without waiting to ask would set out the materials on

the ba--no, no, counter!--with calm assurance bred of an intimate

knowledge of our preferences.

It is a curious trait in human nature but the average man used to take

much joy and pride out of having a refreshment-clerk--and when we say

"refreshment" we use the word in its most dynamic significance--call him

by name and hand him out his favorite brand without asking. It did him

more good than if the president of the bank he made his over-draughts on

had picked him up in the presidential limousine as he was walking down

to the office of a morning.

Perhaps we should not speak about these things now that they are over

and done with and everyone is reformed and uncomfortable; but how is the

coming generation to know anything about the habits of us their

ancestors, unless someone tells them the thirsty truth? As a matter of

fact, it is more than likely that the reader of fifty years from now,

coming on this book among some empty bottles in a dark corner of the

attic, won't know what the dickens we are talking about. Poor old John

Barleycorn may have ceased to be even a memory, and--but then again

perhaps he won't. Very hardy old chap, John!

We do not wish, however, to close this veracious and useful disquisition

on what might be called the Bacchic note--though Bacchic in the most

gentlemanly and respectable sense, of course. Besides, all this talk of

teas has reminded us of one which we like best--though it is a wistful

pleasure--to remember. You see, it was quite a long time ago, and--but

let us get on with the story.

To begin with, we had telephoned to the house--Heaven only knows about

what! Any old excuse was a good excuse in those days. And she said,

after a certain amount of persiflage and badinage--you know the sort of

thing people talk over the 'phone in the spring--she said to come up and

have a cup of tea with her.

It was right in office hours and we had a lot of work to do. But did we

go? Yes, Friend Reader, we did. We rushed out clutching our hat in our

hand, nearly broke a leg catching a car, and every time it stopped to

let anyone on or off, we indulged in a line of mental profanity which

must have created a faint blue aureole around our head like a mediaeval

saint.

They were all out--the family, that is--even to the servant-girl. But

we didn't mind. In fact, our relief was such that we realized at once

it would be unseemly to show it. Our recollection is that we expressed

a certain mild regret for their absence--Lord, what a liar a man can

make of himself at times! Then having behaved like a really nice boy,

we had an apron tied on us, for we had to help make the sandwiches. A

pair of very pretty arms reached round us from behind and hung a silly

little arrangement of linen and frills upon our manly waist, after a

great deal of tugging and squeezing, which was rather complicated by our

irresistible inclination to twist around and watch the strings being

tied in the middle of our back--obviously a difficult feat of an

acrobatic nature.

The sandwiches were finally made--we remember we were told we had spread

the butter too thick. Then we carried the tray in beside a grate-fire,

just an ordinary gas-grate, but if it had been the fires of the eternal

dawn it couldn't have seemed any more cheering. Sunlight streamed in

through the window on a big bowl of daffodils, themselves like a great

splash of sunshine. Outside in the street youngsters were at play. We

never even yet eat a certain kind of sandwich that we don't remember....

But, oh, pshaw, what's the use? What's the use? Besides, think how

much freer and more solvent we are in our present celibate condition.

But there are times and moods, mere trifles like a glimpse of flowers in

the spring or a robin's song or the odor of wet lawns, which bring her

back to us again and make us wince once more as we recall that her name

is now Mrs. Spoffkins.

[Illustration: MANNERS FOR THE MASSES]

*Manners for the Masses*

"Manners Makyth Man."

How often in our eager youth was that hoary old maxim quoted to us with

stern insistence, what time we had seized the last piece of cake on the

plate, or were absorbing our soup with a noise like that of a punctured

vacuum cleaner. Manners makyth man, perhaps; but in those days manners

made us tired.

Now that we have attained manhood's estate, however, and grey hair and a

nice discrimination in Scotch, when there is any to practice on, we

realize the need of more manners--manners for the masses. People in

general are not so polite as they used to be and ought to be.

Street-car conductors, for instance, do not treat us at all times with

the consideration we feel to be our due.

We do not object so bitterly to being told to "step lively there," or

having the conductor jab the end of the fare-box into our diaphragm.

Such little crudities of manner are perhaps inseparable from his rather

trying profession. But the other day we handed a conductor by mistake a

quarter of suspicious antecedents--metallurgically speaking, of course.

Money we can't pass is the only sort of tainted money we recognize. We

fear this particular coin contained more than the usual amount of alloy.

As a matter of fact, we hadn't intended giving it to him at all. We had

laid it aside for a church collection, or a tag-day, or the first pretty

Salvation Army lass we should see with a "self-denial-week" box at a

street corner. But it got into the wrong pocket.

We handed it to the conductor and said, "Blue, please!"--alluding to the

cerulean hue of the tickets. He turned it over two or three times in

his hand, glared at us, walked down to the rear platform to see it in

the better light there, asked two or three men what they thought of it,

and then carried it back to us between the thumb and index finger of the

right hand as though he were holding something dead by the tail. The

whole car watched him drop it with a thud into our grey-suede palm.

"The Company don't let us take nothin' but silver quarters," he remarked

in a loud voice and with quite undue emphasis on the "silver."

We had to hunt through our pockets for a five-cent piece to put in the

box. It was a very painful moment, and naturally the only nickle we

owned hid itself amid a mass of coppers--we had enough of them to bust

our suspenders. And while we hunted, the conductor stood there and

shook the box belligerently under our nose.

Therefore, we repeat, let us by all means have more manners--manners for

street-car conductors and plumbers and elevator-men and the masses

generally. Not even bank-clerks are altogether above reproach in this

respect. We have had several rather regrettable experiences with

bank-clerks--usually in connection with slight over-draughts. And yet

bank-clerks are generally regarded as the budding Chesterfields of the

financial world.

Talking of Chesterfield reminds us of that period in our development at

which his "Letters" burst upon us as a brilliant and a guiding star. We

were about sixteen, and our voice still oscillated between a squeaking

treble and a booming bass. We were also having considerable difficulty

in keeping our extremities decently within the compass of our clothes.

Our manners at that time were those of a breezy but well-intentioned

caveman. No effete conventions for us!--no, sir, nothing but the

simple, unaffected utterance of the heart. It was our aim to be a rough

diamond, a fellow whose shaggy exterior concealed a beautiful soul, and

whom people would come to understand and love after a long time--maybe,

after we were dead. We could see ourself smiling peacefully in our

padded coffin, while the family wept all over the oxidized-silver plate

bearing our name and two dates--n-n-nothing m-m-more!

Perhaps this shaggy-breast-and-heart-of-gold business was not "getting

across" as successfully as we had hoped. Perhaps we had grown weary of

doing little acts of kindness and of love in a rude, untutored way. Or

perhaps the time was merely ripe for a new phase of our social

development. Anyhow, we one day picked up Lord Chesterfield's "Letters

to My Son," and at a bound became a suave and graceful man of the world,

concealing under a smile of wistful charm a cynical and disillusioned

heart. Whatever might be the bitterness of our regrets, as befitted a

man who had known life and women and had suffered, no shadow disturbed

the serenity of our brow. We continued to smile and bow with the old

nonchalant grace, as though it were roses, roses all the way. This was

the impression we tried to convey, at any rate.

The family received our change of heart and manner in a spirit of levity

against which our new ideals were not always proof--but you know the

gentle way of families. Instead of teaching the young idea how to

shoot, they are apt to suggest that it ought to go out and shoot itself.

Naturally we suffered, and not unresentfully. In fact, we so far forgot

ourself as to try to lick our younger brother--a very un-Chesterfieldian

endeavor, and not entirely successful. He had a rushing style of

fighting which--but there are bygones which had best be has-beens.

Of course, we have long since realized that it isn't wise to carry even

so good a thing as manners to an over-elaborate extreme. Not long ago

we had an instance of this--which brings us back to a street-car again.

Wonderful how much one can learn in those humble but interesting

conveyances! It was a crowded car, and we got up when a statuesque

young woman in a very tight skirt stood right in front of us. We got up

as gracefully as the movement of the car would permit, and hanging on a

strap with the skill of long practice we adroitly removed our hat and

bowed. We wanted to let her know that our action was the expression of

a distant but chivalrous respect.

The statuesque young woman never quivered a hair of her expensive

willow-plume, but stared penetratingly at a male collar-ad just over her

head. Perhaps she had not seen us in her reverie. Perhaps the face of

the young gentleman in the dreadfully conspicuous collar reminded her of

someone she knew or loved or both--though we have never known any human

being to look like those faces, and certainly would not think of loving

him if he did.

Whatever the reason she certainly did not see us. We waited for a block

or two, and then we made bold to touch her arm just above the chain of

her beaded bag--it looked like something the Shah of Persia would wear.

"Madam," we said in our most mellow and flute-like tone, "won't you take

this seat?"

She flashed on us a pair of large, dark pupils--belladonna, we

presume--and said in a voice like the drip of an icicle in a cemetery,

"I don't care to sit down."

That was all--no "Thank you" or "Much obliged" or any other of the ready

phrases of casual courtesy. Just, "I don't care to sit down."

It was an unfortunate and deucedly embarrassing experience. We didn't

like to sit down again--in our confusion we would probably have sat in

someone else's lap. And yet it seemed frightfully silly for the two of

us to go on standing there in front of that empty seat. So we stopped

the car and got off half a mile from home.

Now, why did she do that? Was she afraid that if she sat down and said,

"Thank you," we might presume on her graciousness to make a few timely

remarks about the weather, and after a brief survey of the Russian

situation or the newest thing in "movies," should end up by offering her

some gum? Or, on the other hand was she a suffragette who refused to be

put on a basis of inequality and treated as a member of a weaker sex?

Did she see in our action the gloating superiority of man the master?

Imperfectly Proper · 第 5 / 15 段