REFLEXION.

This Emblem Insinuates a Government by _One_ to be less Burdensom, then

a Government by _Many_. And it is well enough Adapted to a Profitable

Allegory. The _Multitude_ of _Birds_ are Impos’d upon, that _One Monarch_

is not sufficient for the Discharging of the Office, and therefore

there’s a Motion put up for the Erecting of More Kings: for Why, say

they, should so many Millions of Men be Subjected to the Power and

Will of One single Person? This Error was begotten betwixt Faction, and

Interest. The One Manages by Design, and the Other falls in upon an

Implicit Resignation; or else Yields, upon Facility, and Weakness. In

the Conclusion, some Man of Observation, and Experience (as the _Crow_

for the purpose) carries them off Clear from the Reasoning Part, and

Applies to the _Mobile_ in their Own Way: That is to say, in a Way of

_Pocket-Arguments_. He never Troubled Himself about the _Original_ of

_Power_, or the _Analogy_ betwixt _Monarchy_ in _Heaven_, and upon

_Earth_; but gives them a short Stroke upon the Subject of _Profit_ and

_Loss_. _You will find it easier_, says he, to _Fill One Sack then Many_:

And That Allusion carry’d the Point.

Fables, of Æsop and other eminent mythologists · 第 1105 / 1486 题