REFLEXION.

This is to bid Men have a care What Company they keep; for when the Good

and the Bad are taken together, they must Go together. Not but that a

Man may lie under some Obligation of Duty and Respect, to Visit, Eat

and Correspond with Many People that he does not Like. And This may be

well enough Done too; provided it be out of Decency, Discretion, or Good

Manners, rather then upon Choice and Inclination. We cannot Honestly

let a Civil Enemy into a Town that’s Besieg’d, or hold any sort of

Intelligence with him (though but in a Bare Curiosity) about the Affairs

of the Garrison. Let a Man Consider now, how much more Dangerous, and

Unwarrantable it is to take an Enemy into our Souls, then into our Forts.

With all Honour yet to a Brave Adversary, apart from his Cause.

’Tis the Fortune of many a Good Man to fall into Bad Company, and to

be Undone by’t, and yet no way Guilty all this while, of the Iniquity

of his Companions. The Letter of the Law Sweeps All in such a Case,

without Distinction of Persons: To say Nothing of the Shame and Dishonour

of being taken up with Rogues and Felons; over and above the Lash of

Publique Justice, and the Contagion of a Lewd Conversation. _Shew me the

Company_ (says the _Adage_) _and I’ll tell you the Man_. What would a

body think now of a Prime _Minister_ that should Conjobble Matters of

State with _Tumblers_ and _Buffoons_; Confer Politiques with Tinkers and

Carr-men? would not any man Judge their Souls to be of the same Standard

and Allay? and that there were no more betwixt them then Cross or Pile,

which should be the Lord, and which the Scoundrel? Or, according to the

Fable, which the _Stork_, and which the _Goose_? For ’tis not the Purple,

but the Virtue, that makes a _Man of Honour_; truly so call’d.

Fables, of Æsop and other eminent mythologists · 第 639 / 1486 题