REFLEXION.

’Tis a Common Thing for a Master to Sacrifice a Servant to his Own Ease

and Interest; but there’s No Meddling with Men of that Inhospitable

Humour, where the Domestiques, how Faithful soever, can never be Secure.

This is according to the Old Moral; but not without some Force (in My

Opinion at least) to the Natural Biass of the Fable. The _Farmer_ has

no Liberty of Choice before him, but either to do what he does, or to

Perish: And in so Doing, (with all respect to the Rules of Honesty) he

does but his Duty; without any way Incurring the Character of an ill

Natur’d Man, or a Cruel Master. But there may be also Another Doctrine

Rais’d from it; which is, That in Cases of Extreme Difficulty, the Laws

of Conveniency, and Ordinary Practice must give place to the Laws of

Necessity. This was the Naked Truth of the _Farmer’s_ Case.

Fables, of Æsop and other eminent mythologists · 第 632 / 1486 题