On the frontier stands our blood testimony; the Socialist side by side

with the bourgeois, the peasant beside the man of learning, the Prince

beside the workman; and they all fight for German freedom, for German

domestic life, for German art, German science, German progress; they

fight with the full, clear consciousness of a noble and rich national

possession, for internal and external goods, all of which serve for the

general progress and development of mankind.

*To Americans From a German Friend*

*By Ludwig Fulda.*

_Like most of the champions of Germany in the literary field,

Ludwig Fulda is a Doctor of Philosophy. He is also author of many

famous poetical and prose works of fiction._

Many things have been revealed to us by this war that even the

keenest-minded among us would have declared immediately before its

outbreak to be impossibilities. Nothing, however, has been a greater and

more painful surprise to Germans than the position taken by a great part

of the American press. There is nothing that we would have suspected

less than that within the one neutral nation with which we felt

ourselves most closely connected, both by common interests and by common

ideals, voices would be raised that in the hour of our greatest danger

would deny us their sympathy, yes, even their comprehension of our

course.

To me, personally--I cannot avoid saying it--this was a very bitter

disappointment. A year has hardly passed since I was over there the

second time as a guest and returned strengthened in my admiration for

that great, upward striving community. In my book, "Amerikanische

Eindrucke," ("American Impressions,") a new edition of which has just

appeared in a considerably supplemented form, comprising the fruits of

that trip, I have made every effort to place before my countrymen in the

brightest light the advantages and superiorities of Americans, and

especially to convince them that the so-called land of the dollar was

not only economically but also mentally and spiritually striding upward

irresistibly; that also in the longing and effort to obtain education

and knowledge and in the valuation of all the higher things in life, it

was not surpassed by any other country in the world. In the entire book

there is not a page that is not filled with the confidence that for

these very reasons America and Germany were called upon to march hand in

hand at the head of cultured humanity. Is this belief now to be

contradicted? Shall I as a German no longer be permitted to call myself

a friend of America because over there they think the worst of us for

the reason that we, attacked in dastardly wise by a world of foes, are

struggling with unanimous determination for our existence?

*Guillotining German Honor.*

Of course I know very well that public opinion over there has largely

been misled by our opponents and is continuously being misled. Did not

the English at the very beginning of the war cut our cable, in order to

be able to guillotine our honor without the least interference? For this

reason I cannot blame the masses if they took for truth the absurd

fables dished out to them, when no contradicting voice could reach them.

Less than that, however, can I understand how educated beings, even men

who, thanks to their gifts and their standing, play the part of

responsible leaders, not only accepted believingly these prevarications

and distortions, but, with them as a basis, immediately rendered a

verdict against us. For he who publicly judges must be expected to have

heard first both parties; and whoever is not in a position to do this

must in decency be expected to postpone his verdict. Yes, even more than

that, one should think that the sense of justice of every non-partisan

must be violated if the one party is absolutely muzzled by the other,

and even for this one reason the cause of the latter must be considered

as not being free from reason for doubt. Furthermore, one should assume

that he who once has been unmasked as a liar therewith should have lost

the blind confidence of the impartial in his future assertions. In spite

of this, although the first ridiculous news of German defeats and

internal dissent could not withstand the far-sounding echo of facts,

there still seems to be no twisting of the truth, no defamation, which

over there is considered as too thin and too ridiculous by the press and

as too shameless by the public.

Should the Germans, who, since the time when they fought for and

attained their national unity, have exclusively devoted themselves to

works of peace and culture, suddenly have been transformed into an

adventurous, booty-hungry horde which from mere lust challenged a

tremendously superior force to do battle? Should they suddenly have

sacrificed to their so-called militarism all their other efforts in

commerce, industry, art, and science, in order to risk their very

existence for the love of this Moloch? Do you believe that, Americans?

*Question of Militarism.*

Our militarism! What does this expression, quoted until it is sickening,

mean in the mouth of enemies who in respect of the energy and extent of

their armaments were not behind us? Is there no such thing as militarism

in France and in Russia? Is the English giant fleet an instrument of

peace? Was the Triple Entente founded in order to bring about the

millennium on earth? Would the Entente, if we had been foolish enough to

disarm, have guaranteed our possessions as a reward for being good? Do

you believe that, Americans?

It certainly may be difficult for the citizens of the Union--happy

beings they are for it--to put themselves in the place of a nation that

knows it is surrounded on its open borders by jealous, hateful, and

greedy neighbors; of a country that for centuries has been the

battlefield of all European wars, the place of strife of all the

European peoples. They, the members of a nation which for itself

occupies a space nearly as large as Europe, almost half of a continent,

protected on both sides by the ocean and on the other borders not

seriously threatened for as long a time to come as may be anticipated,

have no people's army because they do not need any; and yet they

would--their history proves it--give their blood and that of their sons

for the cause of their nation just as gladly as we, if the necessity for

doing so came to them. Will they, therefore, reproach us for loving our

country not less than they do theirs, only for the reason that we have a

thousand times more difficulty in protecting it?

Our general military service, which today is being defamed by the word

"militarism," is born of the iron commandment of self-preservation.

Without it the German Empire and the German Nation long ago would have

been struck out of the list of the living. Only lack of knowledge or

intentional misconception of our character could accuse us of having an

aggressive motive back of it. On earth there is no more peaceful nation

than Germany, providing she be left in peace and her room to breathe be

not lessened. Germany never has had the least thought of assuming for

herself the European hegemony, much less the rulership of the world. She

has never greedily eyed colonial possessions of other great powers. On

the contrary, in the acquisition of her colonies she was satisfied with

whatever the others had left for her. And least of all did she carry up

her sleeve a desire of extending the frontiers of the empire. The famous

word of Bismarck, that Germany was "saturated" with acquired territory,

is still accepted as fully in force to such an extent that even in case

of her victory the question as to which parts of the enemies' territory

we should claim for our own would cause us a great deal of perplexity.

The German Empire could only lose as the national State she is in

strength and unity by acquiring new and strange elements.

Otherwise would the empire, from the day of its founding until now, for

nearly half a century, actually have avoided every war, often enough

under the most difficult circumstances? Would it have quietly suffered

the open or hidden challenges, the machinations of its enemies

constantly appearing more plainly? Yes, would it have tried again and

again to improve its relations with these very same enemies by the

greatest advances? As opposed to the ill-concealed hostility of the

French, would it not have been shaken in its steadfast policy of

conciliation by the fact that this policy with them only made the

impression of weakness and fear? Would it have permitted France to

reconstruct her power which was destroyed in 1870 to a greater extent

than before, and, in addition, allowed her to conquer a new and gigantic

colonial empire? Would it have permitted prostrate Russia to recuperate

undisturbed from the almost annihilating blows of the revolution and the

Japanese war? Would it, in the countless threatening conflicts of the

last decades, have on every occasion thrown the entire weight of its

sword into the scales for the preservation of peace?

*The Kaiser's Responsibility.*

Then, too, many Americans emphasize the fact that they are making not

the German people but the Emperor alone responsible for this war. It is

hardly conceivable how serious-minded people can lend themselves to the

spreading of a fable so childish. When William II., 29 years old,

mounted the throne, the entire world said of him that his aim was the

acquirement of the laurels of war. In spite of this for twenty-six years

he has shown that this accusation was absurd and has proved himself to

be the most honest and most dependable protector of European peace. In

fact, the very circle of enemies which now dares to call him a military

despot thirsting for glory, has year in and year out ridiculed him as a

ruler, whose provocation to the very limit was an amusement absolutely

fraught with no danger. He who has never been misled by the fiery

enthusiasm of youth nor by the full strength of ripe manhood to adorn

his brow with the bloody halo of glory, should he suddenly, when his

hair is turned gray, have turned into a Caesar, an Attila? Do you

believe that, Americans?

It is a fact in times of peace there have been certain differences of

opinion between the Emperor and his people. Although at all times the

honesty of his intentions was elevated above every doubt, the one or

other impulsive moves he took to obtain their realization exposed him to

criticism at home. Today one may safely admit that--today, when of these

trifling disputes not even a breath, not even a shadow, remains. Never

before has his whole people, his whole nation, in every grade of

education, in all classes, in all parties, stood behind him so

absolutely without reserve as now, when in the last, the very last hour,

and driven by direst need, he finally drew the sword to ward off an

attack from three sides, long ago prepared.

Our nation and our Emperor have not wanted this war and are not to be

blamed for it. Even the "White Book" of the German Government, by the

very uncontrovertible language of its documents, must convince every

impartial being of this fact. And day by day the overwhelming evidence

of the plot systematically hatched and systematically carried out under

the guidance of England, which put before us the alternative of cutting

our way through or being annihilated, is increasing.

*No Treason to Austria Considered.*

It may be that the catastrophe, so far as we are concerned, might have

been staved off once more if we would have disregarded the obligation of

our alliance and would have left Austria in the lurch--the Austria which

did not want anything else than to put a stop to the nasty work of a

band of assassins organized by a neighboring State. But it requires an

extreme degree of political blindness for the assumption that by such

cowardly treason we should have been able to purchase a change of mind

or a lasting peace from our enemies. On the contrary, they would soon

enough have used a suitable opportunity to fall upon Germany, which then

would have been completely isolated, and the struggle for our national

existence would have had to be fought under conditions very much more

favorable to our enemies.

According to a newspaper report, the esteemed President Eliot of Harvard

has written that the fear of the Muscovites could not explain our

action, and that an alliance with the Western powers would have offered

better protection against a Russian attack. Yes; if such a thing had

been possible! As a matter of fact, however, the Western powers did not

ally themselves with us against Russia, but with Russia against us; and

not the fear of the Muscovites, but their mobilization, encouraged and

aided by the very same Western powers, drove us to war. I wonder what

President Eliot himself would have done under these circumstances had he

been the guardian responsible for Germany's fate?

*Belgium's Alleged Neutrality.*

But then the violation of Belgian neutrality! How with the aid of this

bugaboo the entire neutral world has been stirred up against us, after

England made it the hypocritical excuse for her declaration of war! We

knew very well that England and France were determined to violate this

neutrality; but, then, we ought to have been very good; we ought to have

waited until they did so. Waited until their armies would break into our

country across our unprotected Belgian frontier! In other words, we

ought to have committed national suicide. Whoever, even up until now,

has doubted the German assertion that Belgium was under one roof with

England and France, and had herself thrown away her neutrality, must

have his eyes opened by the latest official developments. The documents

of the Belgian General Staff which have fallen into our hands contain an

agreement according to which the march through Belgium of British troops

in the case of a Franco-German war was provided for in every detail.

Whosoever in the face of these documents repeats the assertion that we

have committed a violation of innocent Belgium gives aid to a historical

forgery.

We have violated the alleged neutrality of Belgium in self-defense. On

the other hand, the Japanese, egged on and supported by England, have

violated the real neutrality of China from pure lust for robbery. For

the three great powers allied against Germany and Austria have not been

satisfied with their own nominal superiority of 220 millions against 110

millions! In addition to this they have urged on into war against us a

Mongolian people, the most dangerous enemy of the white race and its

culture. They have supplemented their armies by a motley collection of

all the African negro tribes. They lead into battle against us Indian

troops, and the Christian Germanic King of England prays to God for the

victory of the heathen Hindus over his coreligionists and blood

relatives. Americans, does your racial feeling, at other times so

sensitive, remain silent in view of this unexampled shame? Do you accord

to the English and the French, who are attacking us in co-operation with

the Russians, the Servians, and the Montenegrins, who are dirtying

themselves with a brotherhood in arms with the yellow skins, the brown

skins, and the blacks, the right to declare themselves the

representatives of civilization and us to be barbarians?

In order to drive home such evident absurdities, they were, of course,

obliged to carry on the poisoning of the spring of information to the

utmost, they had to suppress the news of the vile deeds of guerrillas

and "snipers" in Belgium and of the Russian ghouls in East Prussia, that

were crying to heaven, and to send out into the world instead fables of

German brutality. Our national army, permeated with ethical seriousness

and iron discipline, the scientist standing beside the farmer, the

workman beside the artist, should be guilty of unnecessary severity,

uncontrollable brutality, brutality against people unable to defend

themselves? Do you believe that, Americans?

*The Charge of Vandalism.*

The climax of absurdity, however, is reached when the Germans, who in

their love and appreciation of art are not surpassed by any people in

the world, are accused of having raged as vandals against works of art.

Even now these accusations, which the French Government itself had the

pitiful courage to support, have proved totally groundless. The City

Hall at Louvain stands uninjured; while the populace fired at them, our

soldiers had, risking their own lives, saved it from the flames. An

imperial art commission followed at the heels of our victorious troops

in Belgium, in order to take charge of the guarding and administration

of the treasures of art. The cathedral at Rheims has received but slight

damage, and would not have been damaged at all had its tower not been

misused by the French as an observation station. I should like to see

the commander of an army who, for the sake of the safety of a historical

monument, would forget the safety of the troops intrusted into his care!

Enough of it! What I have stated is sufficient to show what low weapons

our enemies are using behind the battlefield to sully Germany's shield

of honor. It is enough for those who care to listen at all. But, also,

wherever the weak voice of one rebounds from ears stubbornly closed, the

more powerful voice of truth eventually will force a more just verdict.

Justice--that is all that we expect from America. We respect its

neutrality; we do not ask from it an ideal partisanship for our benefit.

If it does not have for us the sympathy which we have already extended

to it and, after a century and a half of unclouded intercourse between

the two nations, have anticipated there, then we cannot imbue it with

that spirit by reasoning. Furthermore, in the existence of nations

sympathy is not the deciding factor, and every nation should be rebuked

which out of regard for sympathy would in decisive matters act against

its own interests. But just for that very reason one more question must

be raised. In the present conflict, which momentarily almost splits the

entire world into two camps, where do the interests of America lie?

That they are not lying on the side of Russia probably is self-evident.

No free American can find desirable a further extension of the Russian

world empire and of Russian despotism at the expense of Germany. But how

about a country from which once America had to wrest its own liberty in

bloody battle? How about England? Where, if England should succeed in

downing Germany, would her eyes next be pointed? Has she not herself

admitted that she is making war on us principally because she sees in us

an uncomfortable competitor in trade? And which competitor would be the

next one after us that would become awkward to the trust on the Thames?

Yes, have they not already hauled off for the smash against America,

when Japan is given opportunity to increase her power--the same Japan

with whom America sooner or later will be bound to have an accounting

and whose victory over us would make that accounting a great deal more

difficult for the United States?

Germany's fate certainly does not depend upon the friendly or unfriendly

feeling of America. It will be decided solely upon the European

battlefields. But because we are looking out from the night to a future

dawn, because in the midst of our national need the cause of humanity is

close to our heart, for these reasons it is not immaterial to us how the

greatest neutral nation of culture thinks of us. Americans, the cable

between us has been cut. It is our wish and our hope that the stronger

band that unites American ideals with German ideals shall not also be

cut.

*To the Civilized World*

*By Professors of Germany.*

As representatives of German science and art, we hereby protest to the

civilized world against the lies and calumnies with which our enemies

are endeavoring to stain the honor of Germany in her hard struggle for

existence--in a struggle which has been forced upon her.

The iron mouth of events has proved the untruth of the fictitious German

defeats, consequently misrepresentation and calumny are all the more

eagerly at work. As heralds of truth we raise our voices against these.

_It is not true_ that Germany is guilty of having caused this war.

Neither the people, the Government, nor the Kaiser wanted war. Germany

did her utmost to prevent it; for this assertion the world has

documental proof. Often enough during the twenty-six years of his reign

has Wilhelm II. shown himself to be the upholder of peace, and often

enough has this fact been acknowledged by our opponents. Nay, even the

Kaiser they now dare to call an Attila has been ridiculed by them for

years, because of his steadfast endeavors to maintain universal peace.

Not till a numerical superiority which had been lying in wait on the

frontiers assailed us did the whole nation rise to a man.

_It is not true_ that we trespassed in neutral Belgium. It has been

proved that France and England had resolved on such a trespass, and it

has likewise been proved that Belgium had agreed to their doing so. It

would have been suicide on our part not to have been beforehand.

_It is not true_ that the life and property of a single Belgian citizen

was injured by our soldiers without the bitterest self-defense having

made it necessary; for again and again, notwithstanding repeated

threats, the citizens lay in ambush, shooting at the troops out of the

houses, mutilating the wounded, and murdering in cold blood the medical

men while they were doing their Samaritan work. There can be no baser

abuse than the suppression of these crimes with the view of letting the

Germans appear to be criminals, only for having justly punished these

assassins for their wicked deeds.

_It is not true_ that our troops treated Louvain brutally. Furious

inhabitants having treacherously fallen upon them in their quarters, our

troops with aching hearts were obliged to fire a part of the town as a

punishment. The greatest part of Louvain has been preserved. The famous

Town Hall stands quite intact; for at great self-sacrifice our soldiers

saved it from destruction by the flames. Every German would of course

greatly regret if in the course of this terrible war any works of art

should already have been destroyed or be destroyed at some future time,

but inasmuch as in our great love for art we cannot be surpassed by any

other nation, in the same degree we must decidedly refuse to buy a

German defeat at the cost of saving a work of art.

_It is not true_ that our warfare pays no respect to international laws.

It knows no indisciplined cruelty. But in the east the earth is

saturated with the blood of women and children unmercifully butchered by

the wild Russian troops, and in the west dumdum bullets mutilate the

breasts of our soldiers. Those who have allied themselves with Russians

and Servians, and present such a shameful scene to the world as that of

inciting Mongolians and negroes against the white race, have no right

whatever to call themselves upholders of civilization.

_It is not true_ that the combat against our so-called militarism is not

a combat against our civilization, as our enemies hypocritically pretend

it is. Were it not for German militarism German civilization would long

since have been extirpated. For its protection it arose in a land which

for centuries had been plagued by bands of robbers as no other land had

been. The German Army and the German people are one and today this

consciousness fraternizes 70,000,000 of Germans, all ranks, positions,

and parties being one.

We cannot wrest the poisonous weapon--the lie--out of the hands of our

enemies. All we can do is to proclaim to all the world that our enemies

are giving false witness against us. You, who know us, who with us have

protected the most holy possessions of man, we call to you:

Have faith in us! Believe that we shall carry on this war to the end as

a civilized nation, to whom the legacy of a Goethe, a Beethoven, and a

Kant is just as sacred as its own hearths and homes.

For this we pledge you our names and our honor:

ADOLF VON BAEYER, Professor of Chemistry, Munich.

Prof. PETER BEHRENS, Berlin.

EMIL VON BEHRING, Professor of Medicine, Marburg.

WILHELM VON BODE, General Director of the Royal Museums, Berlin.

ALOIS BRANDL, Professor, President of the Shakespeare Society, Berlin.

LUJU BRENTANO, Professor of National Economy, Munich.

Prof. JUSTUS BRINKMANN, Museum Director, Hamburg.

JOHANNES CONRAD, Professor of National Economy, Halle.

FRANZ VON DEFREGGER, Munich.

RICHARD DEHMEL, Hamburg.

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 1, No. 1 From the Beginning to March, 1915, With Index · 第 27 / 31 段