I hesitated delicately, glancing at Mr. Opalsen.

Poirot laughed heartily.

“_Une blague!_ For the benefit of the valet. The card was one with

a specially prepared surface—for finger-prints. I went straight

to Scotland Yard, asked for our old friend Inspector Japp, and laid

the facts before him. As I had suspected, the finger-prints proved

to be those of two well-known jewel thieves who have been ‘wanted’

for some time. Japp came down with me, the thieves were arrested,

and the necklace was discovered in the valet’s possession. A clever

pair, but they failed in _method_. Have I not told you, Hastings,

at least thirty-six times, that without method——”

“At least thirty-six thousand times!” I interrupted. “But where

did their ‘method’ break down?”

“_Mon ami_, it is a good plan to take a place as chambermaid or

valet—but you must not shirk your work. They left an empty room

undusted; and therefore, when the man put down the jewel-case on

the little table near the communicating door, it left a square

mark——”

“I remember,” I cried.

“Before, I was undecided. Then—I _knew_!” There was a moment’s

silence.

“And I’ve got my pearls,” said Mrs. Opalsen as a sort of Greek

chorus.

“Well,” I said, “I’d better have some dinner.” Poirot accompanied

me.

“This ought to mean kudos for you,” I observed.

“_Pas du tout_,” replied Poirot tranquilly. “Japp and the local

inspector will divide the credit between them. But”—he tapped his

pocket—“I have a cheque here, from Mr. Opalsen, and, how say you,

my friend? This week-end has not gone according to plan. Shall we

return here next week-end—at my expense this time?”

Poirot Investigates · 第 63 / 79 题