The pyrexia, at first slight, often reaches a high grade, attended

with occasional chilliness, pains in the back and loins, great

prostration, languor, dulness, and even delirium, with cold sweats,

anxiety, dyspnoea, and at times muscular spasms. As in beasts, there

are the dusky skin and mucous membranes, petechiæ, and cyanosis, and

in bad cases there may be sudden collapse and death. The symptoms vary

much, however, according to the extent of the local lesion, to the

amount of poisonous chemical products thrown into the blood, to the

degree of the invasion of the blood by the bacillus, and to the

complication (not infrequent) of the affection with septicæmia. In the

very mildest cases the affection never proceeds beyond a local slough,

the size of a quarter or half dollar, the germs do not enter the blood

in sufficient numbers to survive, the constitutional symptoms are few

or absent, and the sore heals by granulation.

The disease usually lasts from six to ten days, and for the first

forty-eight hours the symptoms are generally purely local.

Malignant anthrax oedema (oedeme maligne) was first observed by

Bourgeois as occurring in the eyelid, and has since been recognized in

other parts of the body (arm, forearm, head). It differs mainly from

malignant pustule in the absence of the preliminary vesicle, of the

hard nodule (parent nucleus), and of the early circumscribed gangrene.

It has this further peculiarity, that the local disease often appears

as a {941} sequel rather than a precursor of the constitutional

disturbance. It corresponds in the main to the diffuse erysipelatoid

anthrax of the lower animals, and has been attributed to the anthrax

poison introduced by inhalation. It has been observed to follow eating

of anthrax flesh (Leube, Müller). Inasmuch as the active disease is

often delayed a week or ten days after exposure to infection, it may

reasonably be supposed that the bacillus has been imprisoned on the

mucous membrane, or, entering the blood in small quantity only, has

been held in check by the antagonism of the blood-globules until some

elements, escaping into the connective tissue, have started the local

disease. The symptoms are usually first languor, sleeplessness,

restlessness, with some sense of chill, debility, and headache, and

finally, after a few days, the formation of the specific oedema at one

point or more. This has a pale, semi-translucent, slightly yellowish

or greenish aspect, pits on pressure nearly equally at all points, and

tends to a rapid extension, with concomitant aggravation of the

constitutional symptoms, and in many cases nausea and vomiting.

Gangrene sets in--not progressively, as in malignant pustule, but

simultaneously over a more extensive surface--and is followed by great

prostration, stupor, dyspnoea, cyanosis, collapse, and death.

Anthrax intestinalis may be looked upon as the counterpart of the

internal anthrax or anthrax fever of animals, described above. As in

animals, the constitutional symptoms may result early in a fatal

issue, with scarcely any local lesion save in the blood and spleen

(Carganico, Leube, Müller, Winkler, Lorinser). As in animals too, the

sanguineous engorgement of the spleen and the intestinal anthrax are

often complicated by external anthrax oedema or malignant pustule

(Heussinger, Virchow, Buhl, Waldeyer, etc.). In this form pyrexia and

other constitutional disturbances are first seen. There is a general

feeling of languor and depression, with some chilliness, fever, pains

in the limbs, back, and head, vertigo, and ringing in the ears. Even

at this early stage there is noticed a dusky hue of the skin and

visible mucous membranes, which goes on increasing to a brown or

yellow tinge, to petechiæ, or, with the supervention of dyspnoea, to

cyanosis. Digestive derangement is early shown in abdominal pain,

nausea, vomiting, tenderness, some swelling, and finally diarrhoea,

often bloody and sometimes profuse and exhausting. In acute cases the

symptoms become rapidly worse, and then follow discharge from the

mouth and nose of uncoagulable blood, dyspnoea, cyanosis, small pulse,

dilated pupils, great anxiety or drowsiness, and stupor, or there may

be tonic spasms of the trunk or extremities. Death usually results

from asphyxia or collapse, as in animals. These cases are almost

invariably fatal within a period of thirty-six hours, though some

linger six or seven days.

Allied to the intestinal anthrax is anthrax angina, a not unknown

occurrence in man. This begins as a bad sore throat, with an

especially dark-red hue of the pharyngeal mucous membrane. As it

advances the shade becomes increasingly darker, the power of

deglutition is lost, serous phlyctenæ with gangrene and deep

ulceration set in, but without any tendency to the formation of false

membrane as in diphtheria. There are early superadded the

constitutional symptoms above described, and the patient dies in a

state of collapse or asphyxia.

MORBID ANATOMY.--The lesions closely agree with those already {942}

described for animals in general. The blood presents the same dark-red

or black, tarry, incoagulable, or only slightly coagulable condition

in the worst cases, yet this is less constant in man, as the bacteria

are less constant or numerous in the blood, in keeping with the more

prolonged localization of the external anthrax in man, and the more

pronounced antagonism between the blood and the bacillus which results

from feeding exclusively or largely on flesh. The red globules do not

tend to adhere together, and the white globules are in excess and very

granular. The spleen is less extensively enlarged than in animals, but

is highly charged with blood, bacilli, and micrococci. The lymphatic

glands too are enlarged, hyperæmic, cloudy, hemorrhagic at points, of

a dark grayish, deep red, or blackish color, and highly charged with

the bacillus. The surface of the skin and mucous membranes (mouth)

presents hemorrhagic spots and patches, with serous vesicles and

eschars. The malignant pustule when cut into presents a central slough

and a surrounding hard indurated mass, both of a dark blood-red, with

similar prolongations downward into the adipose tissue, and around all

the characteristic oedematous infiltration, often streaked with blood.

The bacillus is found in tufts or dense groups at intervals in the

rete mucosum, the dermis, and the subcutaneous connective tissue. The

serous membranes present the same general lesions as in animals. The

walls of the stomach and bowels are the seat of cloudy red

infiltration, with at intervals small hemorrhagic foci, and on the

mucous surface distinct sloughs. Jelly-like exudations are also found

in these membranes in the mesentery and in the retro-peritoneal

tissue. The liver and kidneys are usually congested or are infiltrated

with an oedematous exudate, and in these, as in all the local anthrax

lesions, the characteristic bacilli are found.

DIAGNOSIS.--Malignant pustule is distinguished by its commencing from

a minute red point with dark centre, and by its progressive extension

from this point by a dark-red, puffy, and vesicular areola, with

steadily advancing induration and gangrene. The bites of insects have

a yellowish central point with red areola. A boil lacks the dark

centre and the rapidly rising elevated red areola. Carbuncles and

plague-boils tend to appear on clothed parts of the body, respectively

on the back of the neck and shoulders and on the trunk and

extremities. In carbuncle several boils rise and burst simultaneously,

though they may finally slough into one sore, while in anthrax the

extension is from one point. The plague-boil is usually multiple and

much more painful than anthrax. The glanderous nodule is usually

multiple, situated at intervals on the course of a lymphatic, the

intervening portion of which is inflamed, hard, and cord-like. It is

also usually associated with the specific glairy discharge from the

nose, the nasal ulcers and nodules, and the enlarged painless,

nodular, and indolent submaxillary lymphatic glands. As a last resort

the detection of the bacillus in the indurated nucleus and the

inoculability of the disease on the lower animals (rabbit,

guinea-pig), may be appealed to.

Malignant anthrax oedema is less easily recognized, but may be

inferred from the sudden swelling with a dusky yellow or greenish hue

and a tendency to vesiculation and gangrene, the whole preceded and

attended by the constitutional symptoms of anthrax, and, above all,

from the presence of the bacillus in the exudate.

{943} In both of these forms much may be deduced from the known

liability of the district to anthrax, from the occupation of the

subject as being exposed to infection (worker in hair, wool, bristles,

hides, catgut, etc.), or from his having eaten meat which was open to

suspicion.

Internal anthrax is less certainly diagnosed because of the absence of

local symptoms until the constitutional disorder is well advanced. Yet

the reasonable suspicion of infection and the sudden and violent

eruption of the disease (headache, nausea, vomiting, bloody diarrhoea,

extreme anxiety, debility, dyspnoea, cyanosis, convulsions, collapse,

with petechiæ, and local discharges of diffluent blood) serve to

identify it. The bacillus is not always to be detected in the blood

under the microscope, but its presence can usually be demonstrated by

inoculation.

PROGNOSIS.--The prognosis of malignant pustule energetically treated

in its early stages is good. The disease is as yet a local one, and

the germs can be extinguished by local treatment. In anthrax

districts, where the disease is feared and early recognized, the

mortality may be from 5 per cent. (Nicolai) to 9 per cent. (Lengyel,

Koranyi). Even this mortality is mainly due to delay in treatment. In

districts, on the other hand, where the malady is infrequent, and

where efficient measures are applied too late, the mortality is often

30, 40, or even 50 per cent. After internal infection, and where local

symptoms only appear after general infection, the case is very

hopeless.

PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT.--The prophylaxis of anthrax in man is to a

large extent identical with that for animals. All considerations as

regards soil, culture, drainage, sick and dead stock, cremation,

burial, disinfection, etc. have a most important if only a secondary

bearing on the protection of man. Still more important is the free use

of carbolic acid, chloride of lime, or tincture of iodine for the

hands of those dressing unhealthy sores in animals or handling

suspicious cases of sickness or cadavers, and of those working in

hides, wool, hair, horns, hoofs, guts, etc. Similarly, all products of

animals with anthrax should be withheld from general use.

In external anthrax of man, before the system has been contaminated,

the thorough destruction by caustic of the diseased part with its

contained poison is most effectual. Where there is as yet but the

preliminary papule it may be incised and thoroughly destroyed by a

stick of chloride of zinc, caustic potassa, or nitrate of silver, or,

if more convenient, by fuming nitric acid, muriatic or sulphuric acid,

or, perhaps preferably to all others, iodized phenol. Should the

parent nucleus have already formed, it should be excised with the

knife or deeply incised in a crucial direction, and then thoroughly

cauterized with one of the more potent escharotics (caustic potassa,

strong nitric acid) or with the iodized phenol. The latter agent may

be further applied on the sound skin adjacent, especially if there is

the slightest swelling or redness. Should the peripheral oedema

persist or reappear after the cauterization, the latter should be

repeated until this tendency is overcome. Hypodermic injections of a

solution of iodine and iodide of potassium may be made into the entire

swelling. After the caustic has done its work the eschar may be

softened and its separation favored by a warm poultice containing a

small amount of carbolic acid or iodized phenol. This treatment is

often highly beneficial, even after constitutional symptoms have set

in, by arresting the {944} propagation of the bacillus and checking

its introduction and that of its chemical products into the

circulation.

Constitutional treatment is not to be forgotten. Carbolic acid may be

profitably given to the extent of fifteen drops daily, iodide of

potassium ten to twenty grains thrice a day, and sulphate of quinia

ten grains at the same intervals. The strength should be sustained by

iron (tincture of the chloride) and wine or other alcoholic beverage,

both being, like the agents already named, calculated to retard if not

to limit the propagation of the bacillus. The diet throughout should

be nutritious and easily digested.

When a person is known to have eaten anthrax meat an emetic will be

indicated, followed by a smart oleaginous purgative combined with five

drops of carbolic acid, and subsequently by the constitutional

treatment above recommended. In case of extensive anthrax oedema,

incisions may be made into the part as far as the yellow exudate

extends, and a poultice containing carbolic acid may be applied. Or,

preferably, the swelling may be freely injected with a weak solution

of iodized phenol (1:100 water), and then painted with the same agent

or with tincture of iodine.

{945}

PYÆMIA AND SEPTICÆMIA.

BY B. A. WATSON, M.D.

HISTORY.--There is little to be learned from existing literature of

the views which were maintained by the ancients, prior to the birth of

Christ, in regard to the morbid conditions now designated pyæmia and

septicæmia; although it is certain they were recognized by the "Father

of Medicine," who reports a well-marked case of puerperal fever

terminating fatally on the twentieth day of the disease, and also a

case in which death was unquestionably caused by septic poisoning, as

is clearly shown in the following:[1] "Criton, in Thasno, while still

on foot and going about, was seized with a violent pain in the great

toe; he took to his bed the same day, had rigors and nausea, recovered

his heat slightly; at night was delirious. On the second, swelling of

the whole foot, and about the ankle, erythema with distension and

small bullæ (phlyctænæ); acute fever; he became furiously deranged;

alvine discharges, bilious, unmixed, and rather frequent. He died on

the second day from commencement." Additional confirmation of the fact

that Hippocrates was familiar with the phenomena of these diseases may

be found in his dissertation on empyema and fevers. Prof. C. Heuter

says, under the head of septic fever,[2] "Hippocrates and Celsus

observed the fever in cases of injuries which proved so dangerous that

this danger could not have originated from the inflammation or from

the wound alone." Jacotius, a commentator of Hippocrates, has even

mentioned putrid fevers, the same as Adrianus Spigelius, who spoke of

fevers which arise from putrefaction; but both authors, as well as

their followers, did not discriminate between septicæmia arising from

the putrescence of wounds and pyæmia. In the mean time both varieties

were regarded as intermittent fever.

[Footnote 1: _Works of Hippocrates_, trans. by Adams, vol. i. p. 377.]

[Footnote 2: Pitha und Billroth, _Handbuch der Chirurgie_, 1 Band, 2

Abth., 1 Heft, 1 Liefg., S. 6.]

"Aretæus lived during the middle of the second century of the

Christian era. In his remarks on pneumonia he observes that the

subjects of this disease die mostly on the seventh day. 'In certain

cases,' he says, 'much pus is formed in the lungs, or there is a

metastasis from the side if a greater symptom of convalescence be at

hand. But if, indeed, the matter be translated from the side to the

intestine or bladder, the patients immediately recover from the

peripneumony.' He speaks of a metastasis to the kidneys and bladder

being peculiarly favorable in empyema. He ascribes suppuration of the

liver to intemperance and protracted disease, {946} especially

dysentery and colliquative wasting. The symptoms described by him

resemble those of chronic pyæmia."[3]

[Footnote 3: Braidwood on _Pyæmia_, p. 2.]

Galen and some of the other ancient physicians recognized the

existence of septic poisoning, as is shown by the opinions expressed

on the subject of putrid fevers. According to Galen, putrid fevers may

either arise from the conversion of ephemerals, or originally from

putrefaction of the fluids within the vessels.

Aetius states that they arise from constriction of the skin or

viscidity of the humors, whereby the perspiration is stopped, and the

quantity of vital heat so altered as to give rise to putrefaction,

first of the fluids, and afterward of the fat and solid parts. When

these corrupted fluids are contained within the vessels they occasion

synochous fevers, but when distributed over the body they give rise to

intermittents. Synesius and Constantinus Africanus give a similar

account. Alexander gives an interesting and ingenious disquisition on

the origin and nature of putrid fevers, one of the most common causes

of which he holds to be the conversion of ephemeral fevers, and the

inseparable symptoms being want of concoction in the urine and

quickness of the pulse with systoles. This is the account of them

given by most of the other authorities, both Greek and Arabian, so

that we need not enter into any circumstantial exposition of their

views. We shall merely give the brief account of those furnished by

Palladius. There are, he says, two kinds of synochous fevers, the one

being occasioned by effervescence, and the other by putrefaction of

the blood; of these the latter are the more protracted and dangerous.

In them the pulse is contracted, the heat pungent, and the urine white

and putrid.[4]

[Footnote 4: Paulus Ægineta, trans. by Adams, vol. i. p. 236 (Sydenham

Soc., 1844).]

A new era in the literature of this subject dawned during the

sixteenth century. Ambrose Paré and Bartholomew Maggi each published a

work in which they pointed out the old errors and announced new

truths. Paré's _Treatise on Gunshot Wounds_ was published in Paris in

1551, while Maggi's treatise appeared a year later at Bologna. Paré

gained his first experience in the treatment of gunshot wounds in

1536, which is described as follows: "The storming of the small

mountain-fortress Villane, near Susa, probably gave him for the first

time full occupation, and he followed in all things the example of

older colleagues. Like them, although hesitatingly, he poured into the

gunshot wounds boiling oil of elder to destroy the poison, but the oil

fell short, and then he was compelled to dress the other wounded men

with an ointment of oil of roses and turpentine. Fearing that the

latter would soon become victims of the wound-poison, he passed a

sleepless night, got up early to see the ill consequences, but was

greatly surprised to find those that he had half given up free from

pain and without inflammation or swelling, while those who had been

treated with boiling oil lay in a state of fever, with great pain and

much swelling. He therefore determined, as he tells us, never again to

burn the poor subjects of gunshot wounds so cruelly."[5] It will be

seen that Paré's treatise on gunshot wounds was published fifteen

years after this impressive experience at the fortress of Villane. In

this work he sought to correct the prevailing idea that {947} gunshot

wounds were poisonous, and was ably supported in his effort by

Bartholomew Maggi; but it required all the respect which Paré enjoyed

in riper years to gradually obtain consideration for the new view. The

idea that gunshot wounds were poisonous is supposed to have originated

in the fact that in every war there are cases of acute sepsis,

developed after the infliction of these injuries, which agree in all

their essential points with the results of the bites of poisonous

snakes. We are even informed that during the late Franco-Prussian War

there were cases which even excited suspicion among the laymen that

the enemy had used poisoned missiles.

[Footnote 5: _German Clinical Lectures_, 2d series (New Sydenham Soc.,

1877), p. 65 _et seq._]

The nature of the error which Paré and Maggi endeavored to correct is

shown by the declaration made by Johannes de Vigo at the commencement

of the sixteenth century, who expressed in dogmatic form the views

then firmly held by physicians. "A gunshot wound is a contused wound,

he says, for the bullet is round; it is burnt, for the bullet is

heated; it is poisoned, for the powder is poisonous. The poisoning is

the essential condition; therefore the treatment must be directed

above all to counteract this."

The next step was that a poisonous substance may develop itself or

settle in the wound, and especially in gunshot wounds--a substance

which has nothing to do with powder or lead. Paré himself adopted this

view. When he took part in the siege of Rouen many wounds sloughed and

had a cadaverous smell, and on opening the bodies of those who died

numerous collections of pus were found in different parts full of

greenish ill-smelling ichor. Besiegers and besieged believed

themselves to be wounded with poisoned bullets. Paré looked for the

cause in a deterioration of the air by the large quantity of

decomposing substances, and he appears to have assumed, as is done at

this day, a direct action of the so-called deteriorated air upon the

wound itself.

The evil influence of air vitiated by the products of decomposition,

not upon wounds only, but upon the organism generally, has never been

lost sight of by physicians since that time. That rotten straw,

decomposing bodies of men and animals, surfaces saturated with

excrement, and overcrowding of badly-ventilated hospitals give rise to

infectious fevers and unhealthy state of wounds is not a result of

modern observation only. That it was a question of the processes of

fermentation which became communicated to the body by means of the

exciters of fermentation contained in the air was a view frequently

adopted. "To quote one only out of many; John Pringle, in his

_Observations on the Diseases of the Army_, published in 1775, devotes

a chapter especially to 'Diseases resulting from Bad Air,' and his

forty-eight experiments on septic and antiseptic substances contain

numerous hints at attempts resembling those made at the present day to

determine the antiseptic power of certain things. No advance was made,

however, beyond vague surmises concerning the nature of the exciters

of putrefaction, and they were for the most part looked for amongst

the volatile, ill-smelling products of decomposition, and were

believed to be extremely subtle gaseous matters."[6]

[Footnote 6: _German Clinical Lectures_, Second Series (New Sydenham

Soc., 1877), p. 67 _et seq._]

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 · 第 128 / 149 段