In the Philadelphia epidemic, out of a total of 1174 cases there were,

as nearly as can be ascertained, 169 deaths, giving a rate of

mortality of 14.4 per cent. Taking all the cases admitted to the

hospital under our observation, many of which entered at a late period

of the disease and not a few when moribund, the mortality was not less

than 13 per cent. {423} The mortality among the negroes who were

attacked with the disease was considerably greater than among the

whites. Finally, if the mortality of the bilious typhus form be

considered separately--although from the frequency of jaundice in this

epidemic and the numerous gradations of severity presented it is

difficult to form a sharply defined group of this character--it was

certainly not less than 50 per cent.

The date of death varies with the epidemic, the form of the disease,

and the previous condition of vitality of those attacked. Ordinarily,

by far the larger proportion of deaths occur during the first relapse

or the second interval, but in bilious typhoid cases, presenting grave

complications, especially pneumonia or severe hemorrhages at an early

date, or in cases occurring in intemperate subjects, or in those

previously in impaired health, the mortality is much heavier in the

initial paroxysm or the first interval than at later periods.

Youth exerts the same favorable influences upon the result of

relapsing fever as it does in the case of typhus and typhoid.

Murchison states that of 717 male patients under twenty-five years of

age admitted into the London Fever Hospital, not one died, and in most

epidemics similar, though not equally marked, results have been noted.

In some epidemics the mortality among young children has been

considerable. As a rule, the percentage of deaths increases with each

decade after thirty years.

Sex does not exert any definite or constant influence upon the

mortality. The number of males affected is far greater; they are

liable to be exposed to the contagion in its most concentrated form; a

larger proportion of them are probably the subjects of intemperance

than in the case of females; and thus most statistics agree in making

the mortality somewhat greater in the male sex; but, all things being

equal, there is no good reason for holding that sex itself has any

value in determining the result.

As in other zymotic diseases, the mortality from relapsing fever is

highest during the early period of an epidemic, and the type of the

disease grows milder as the epidemic declines. Cases of the bilious

typhoid form have become notably less frequent during the later stages

of some epidemics than at an earlier period.

Marked difference has been observed also as to the action of remedies

at different stages of epidemics, the early cases exhibiting an

extraordinary resistance to remedies, and especially to anodynes,

which passes away later. When typhus and relapsing fevers have

prevailed together, and a clear discrimination between the two sets of

cases has not been made, it has appeared that the mortality increased

as the epidemic advanced, but this apparent exception has been due to

the fact that at first the cases of relapsing fever were in the

majority, while later those of typhus, the much more fatal disease,

preponderated.

Epidemics of relapsing fever prevail at all seasons, but more commonly

they are at their height during the colder months of the year. The

total mortality will of course correspond, but the actual percentage

is not constantly greater during any one season, although it is

probable that the greater liability to chest complications during the

colder months will render the disease more fatal then.

The gravity of relapsing fever has varied so greatly in different

epidemics that it is very difficult to determine what influence upon

the mortality {424} has been exerted by mere difference of race. A

further source of difficulty is found in estimating the differences in

the physical conditions of the poorer classes in the various

communities affected. The mortality has been exceptionally high in the

Russian and Indian epidemics and in some of the German ones, while in

the British epidemics it has uniformly been light. It is interesting

to note that in the Philadelphia epidemic, where the great majority of

patients were Irish or negroes, the mortality was high, over 14 per

cent. The previous condition of the Irish patients must certainly have

contrasted favorably with that of the individuals attacked in the

Dublin and Belfast epidemics, so that the difference in result seems

attributable only to a greater virulence of the disease. As an ample

opportunity was here afforded to judge of the relative severity of

relapsing fever in the negro and white races when the cases occurred

at the same season, at the same stage of the epidemic, and in

individuals living under nearly similar conditions, it may be stated

that the conclusion of all who studied the question closely was that

the disease was much more severe among negroes, and in particular that

they displayed a greater tendency to serious complications and to the

bilious typhoid form.

Although the degree and virulence of the infection undoubtedly

constitute the most important elements in determining the mortality,

the previous health and habits of those attacked with relapsing fever

exert an influence upon the result. This is especially true of

habitual intemperance, which, by disposing to disease of the liver and

kidneys, greatly increases the liability to a fatal result. It has

been seen (page 409), however, that even when acute catarrhal

nephritis existed at the time of the attack severe relapsing fever

might terminate favorably. Another observation which we made

frequently, and which coincides with what is well known in regard to

typhoid and typhus, is that improper exertion and exposure during the

stage of incubation and immediately after the invasion produced a

highly unfavorable effect on the subsequent course of the disease, and

seemed in particular to dispose to dangerous or fatal collapse at the

critical periods.

Apart from these general considerations, there are many special points

to be considered in regard to the prognosis of relapsing fever:

If after the crisis of the invasion there is not rapid and decided

improvement, complications should be suspected.

A sharp rebound of temperature quickly following crisis may be

followed by speedy death.

Mere elevation of temperature during the invasion and the relapse,

even though to an extreme height, is not attended with the danger

which even a somewhat lower degree would indicate in other zymotic

diseases.

Increased elevation toward the expected time of crisis should arouse

anxiety, as sudden and dangerous cerebral symptoms may occur.

Prolonged duration of the pyrexia, or the substitution of irregular

gradual defervescence (lysis) for the characteristic crisis often

associated with typhoid symptoms as are these conditions, is

significant of complications and of danger.

Wild delirium during the pyrexia, or transient active delirium about

the time of crisis, is not necessarily unfavorable, but continuous low

delirium, with disposition to stupor, is associated with a typhoid

tendency and is frequently followed by death. Excessive muscular {425}

tremor or convulsions are highly unfavorable, but not necessarily

fatal, symptoms.

Cardiac murmurs are not of serious import. The pulse is not usually as

rapid in proportion to the temperature as in typhus or typhoid, and an

excessively rapid pulse toward the expected time of crisis, especially

if associated with feebleness of the heart's action, points to the

danger of sudden collapse at or soon after that time. Previous cardiac

disease, especially fatty degeneration in habitually intemperate

persons, increases this danger. Continued frequency of pulse after the

crisis indicates some complication or the danger of some accident.

Cough of a bronchial origin is not a specially unfavorable symptom,

but if associated with the physical signs of pneumonia and with marked

disturbance of respiration it indicates extreme danger.

Epistaxis, even when copious, often occurs in favorable cases, but

hemorrhage from the stomach or the kidneys is usually, though not

invariably, followed by death.

An eruption, measly or of pink spots, with or without minute petechiæ,

is rare, and usually occurs in severe cases, but is not of specially

unfavorable significance unless associated with the typhoid state or

with patches of purpura.

Hiccough is a much less unfavorable symptom in relapsing fever than in

typhoid or typhus, and vomiting, even frequent and persistent, may

occur in cases of ordinary severity.

Enlargement of the liver and spleen indicates special risk only when

persistent for some time after the relapse, in connection with

persistent irregular fever. Jaundice has no necessarily unfavorable

signification, is frequent in ordinary cases in some epidemics, but

when it is associated with the other features of the bilious typhoid

form the danger is extreme, at least 33 per cent. of such cases

proving fatal.

Slight transient albuminuria may exist without special danger, but if

associated with evidences of catarrhal nephritis, or if extreme

diminution of urine, with or without albuminuria, exists, cerebral

symptoms are apt to ensue, with a high degree of danger.

All serious complications--parotitis, erysipelas, dysentery, abortion,

pneumonia, and, above all, peritonitis--greatly increase the risk.

It is not possible to determine in what cases the relapse will fail to

occur. Motschutkoffsky's statement, that when a slight post-critical

rise occurs a relapse will follow, must be applicable only to a

limited number of cases.

In all cases at least one relapse must be expected; the patient in the

interval must be regarded as still sick, and after the close of the

relapse he must still be treated with rigid care until convalescence

is permanently established. It must be remembered in hospital practice

that many patients enter toward or after the crisis of the first

paroxysm, so that caution is needed in estimating the effect of

remedies and the period of the disease.

The undue prominence of certain conditions during the course of the

disease is apt to be followed by corresponding sequelæ, and

emaciation, anæmia, dyspepsia, diarrhoea, dysentery, enlargement of

the spleen and rheumatoid pains may then be anticipated. The liability

to ophthalmia and affections of the middle ear is not to be forgotten.

{426} CAUSES OF DEATH.--In fatal cases death occurs from exhaustion

dependent on the protracted and severe sufferings of the patient; from

cerebral symptoms; from hyperpyrexia; from the virulence of the

toxæmia; from uræmic poisoning; from sudden collapse; or from some

complication, such as hemorrhagic meningitis, hemorrhages, pneumonia,

dysentery, rupture of the spleen, peritonitis, or abortion.

TREATMENT.--The indications for treatment presented by regular cases

of relapsing fever seem to be--to moderate the pyrexia; to relieve

distressing symptoms, especially pain, insomnia, and gastric

irritability; to sustain the strength of the system; to prevent or

modify the relapses; and to avoid complications and sequelæ.

It is needless to observe that until the nature of the specific cause

of relapsing fever is fully determined, whether the spirillum occupy

that relation or not, it is impossible to direct our efforts

rationally toward its neutralization or elimination. The various

remedies which have been employed for these special purposes have no

clinical support to recommend them. And while experiment has shown

that the activity of the spirillum is readily destroyed by the direct

action of various weak solutions, as of quinine, carbolic acid,

iodine, and mineral acids, no special curative effect follows the

internal administration of these remedies, even in the largest doses

consistent with safety. In fact, there can scarcely be any disease in

which treatment is less satisfactory or its results more difficult to

estimate. The marked difference between various epidemics, and the

wide variation presented by the development of individual symptoms in

different cases of the same epidemic, fully account for this.

Quinine, as might be expected, has been largely used, in the hope that

it might control the pyrexia or prevent the relapse. Murchison[39]

quotes a considerable amount of evidence from various sources to show

that it does not possess either of these powers. It was administered

to a considerable number of our cases, either in small and frequently

repeated doses during the pyrexia or the intermission, or else in

large doses repeated several times in immediate anticipation of the

expected time of the relapse. Thus in some cases three grains of

sulphate of quinia were given every two or three hours until tinnitus

was produced, and then this was maintained during the remainder of the

pyrexia and of the intermission. The amount given daily was from

thirty to forty-two grains. It seemed to rather increase the

discomfort in the head, and in some cases it aggravated the

irritability of the stomach. The pyrexia was certainly not controlled

by it. Given in the same manner during the intermission, it was

usually well borne, but was not effectual in preventing the relapse.

It is true that in some cases the subsequent relapse seemed to be

somewhat modified.

[Footnote 39: _Op. cit._, p. 408.]

Thus in one case 30 grains were given on the 6th of April; 39 grains

on the 7th; 39 grains on the 8th; 42 grains on the 9th; and 60 grains

on the 10th; the critical fall had occurred during the night of the

7th, and the relapse began on the evening of the 9th, but the rise in

temperature was less abrupt than usual, and the relapse lasted less

than five days. It was quite severe, however, so that it is doubtful

whether the apparent modification was anything more than is frequently

observed in cases where no quinine has been administered.

In another case the fall in temperature at the end of the first

paroxysm {427} was from 105.5° to 97° on March 26th: 35 to 40 grains

of sulphate of quinine were given daily on April 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th,

and 8th; the temperature began to rise on the 3d, but the severe

pyrexia and the usual symptoms of the relapse were limited to a period

of less than thirty-six hours. This is a less common irregularity, and

yet does not afford sufficient evidence of the efficiency of quinine.

In other cases, however, as already stated, no appreciable effect

followed its administration in this manner.

To illustrate the other method of giving quinia, a case may be quoted

in which 20-grain doses every three or four hours were given from

April 25th to April 29th, so that in four days 575 grains were taken.

The initial paroxysm was of average severity, and terminated at the

end of the seventh day, April 20th. The quinine did not postpone the

relapse, which occurred on April 28th, but was of much less than the

usual duration.

In no other case in which these large doses were given was there even

as much reason as in the above instance to attribute to quinine any

positive influence upon the course of the disease.

In order to demonstrate that the failure of quinine was not dependent

upon a want of absorption, Muirhead injected large amounts

subcutaneously with no better results.

In conclusion, it may be said that the evidence shows positively that

quinine possesses no specific influence whatever upon relapsing fever;

that in only occasional cases, if at all, will even enormous doses

given during the intermission postpone or modify the subsequent

relapse; and that it is not effective in reducing the temperature. In

view, therefore, of the usual gastric irritability and tendency to

vertigo and headache, which seem to be increased by large doses of

quinine, and, further, in view of the small mortality, and of the fact

that when death occurs it usually comes from causes over which large

doses of quinine could exert no influence, it seems clear that this

drug should be prescribed only in tonic doses and only in cases where

it is well tolerated by the stomach.

Arsenic was used in a considerable number of our cases with the view

of determining if it possessed any power of relieving the severe pains

or of influencing the relapse. It was administered in the form of

Fowler's solution (Liq. potassii arsenitis), and was given exclusively

by the mouth. If given during the intermission, it was well borne in

doses of five to ten drops every four or even every three hours, given

freely diluted with water and immediately after food. In several cases

it quickly induced puffiness about the eyes, but no effect whatever

was produced on the pains or on the succeeding relapse. In more than

one such case there was an unusually profuse crop of sudamina during

the relapse, many of the vesicles breaking and being followed by

brownish stains. When given during the pyrexia it aggravated the

nausea and vomiting, so that it had to be suspended. In one

unfortunate case, indeed, although promptly suspended, the arsenical

solution seemed to have assisted in the establishment of vomiting and

purging, which proved uncontrollable and contributed greatly to the

fatal result. Hypodermic injections of arsenic have been used

considerably with no better results. There seems, therefore, to be no

reason whatever for any further use of this drug in relapsing fever.

{428} The high pyrexia and the severe rheumatoid pains have naturally

suggested the use of salicylic acid and the salicylate of soda. We

were not sufficiently aware of their antipyretic properties in 1869-70

to have recourse to them, but in more recent epidemics Unterburger[40]

and Riess[41] have found that large doses of the latter substance (one

hundred grains or more daily) will reduce the temperature either in

the initial paroxysm or in the relapse, but that the disease is not

cut short nor are the lesions of the blood or solids prevented.

[Footnote 40: _Jahrb. f. Kinderheilk._, v. x., 1876.]

[Footnote 41: _Deutsch. Med. Wochnsch._, Dec., 1879.]

It must be borne in mind here, as in connection with the action of

quinine, that apparent modifications of the relapse are to be viewed

with great distrust, since such great irregularities therein naturally

present themselves. Care must further be taken lest such attempts to

reduce the temperature aggravate the irritation of the stomach, and by

lessening the power of taking food induce more serious exhaustion than

would have resulted from the unchecked pyrexia. The evidence in our

possession is not sufficient to justify a positive decision as to the

therapeutic value of the salicylates in relapsing fever, but,

apparently, they are applicable to only a portion of the cases, and in

these are of but limited utility.

The same failure which has followed the use of quinine, of arsenic,

and of salicin and the salicylates has attended the effort to prevent

the relapse by berberine, benzoate of soda, tincture of eucalyptus,

and other reputed antiperiodics.

Digitalis, veratrum viride, and aconite were used by us quite freely

as antipyretics. The first two of these were often suspended on

account of the irritability of the stomach, and no valuable results

followed their use when well tolerated. Aconite in small doses,

frequently repeated, as one drop every two hours, seemed to aid in

allaying nausea and to exert some slight influence upon the fever. In

cases where there was a distinct tendency to heart-failure, digitalis

was given freely with advantage.

Cold baths were not used to reduce the temperature in any of the cases

under our observation. They have been employed in other epidemics,

but, as far as we know, with no other effect than to cause merely

temporary lowering of temperature, without any decided relief to the

other symptoms and without any apparent influence upon the course of

the disease. Frequent spongings with cool water and the application of

ice to the head gave only slight and temporary relief.

Simple febrifuge remedies, such as effervescing draught or spirit of

nitrous ether with solution of acetate of ammonium, were well received

by the stomach, and appeared to promote perspiration and the more free

secretion of urine.

Finding all our efforts to control the pyrexia so unsuccessful,

recourse was had in a large proportion of our cases to the

hyposulphite of soda, given, dissolved in two ounces of water, in

doses of twenty grains every two or three hours. In two cases it

seemed to increase nausea, and at times it caused some purging, but

otherwise it was well borne by the stomach, and, indeed, frequently

appeared to aid in controlling vomiting. The records show that this

drug was given in only two or three of the fatal cases, so that

although the patients who took it regularly presented every grade of

severity of the disease, they did well uniformly. It is certain,

however, that the hyposulphite of soda exerted no specific effect

{429} upon the disease; it did not reduce temperature, it did not

prevent or modify the relapses nor relieve the severe pains; it may

have promoted more free and healthy secretions, and, by tending to

prevent vomiting, may have aided in maintaining nutrition; but, on the

whole, it may fairly be doubted whether this remedy merits any more

extended trial.

One chief reason of the failure of antipyretics in relapsing fever is

to be found in the existence of widespread irritative lesions of the

glandular and mucous tissues, which combine with the specific

blood-changes in causing and maintaining the high temperature. It is

not surprising, therefore, that the remedies which afford the greatest

relief in this disease are opiates and sedatives to the

gastro-intestinal mucous membrane. Opium, or morphia, must indeed be

regarded as the basis of the rational treatment of relapsing fever. It

is called for by the insomnia, the severe headache and the pains in

various parts of the body, the nausea and vomiting, and the pyrexia.

It does not appear to have been as prominent a feature in the

treatment of other epidemics as we found it necessary to make it in

Philadelphia. Parry[42] used it very freely, chiefly in the form of

opium, by the mouth, and found a singular tolerance exhibited by his

patients, several of whom took as large a dose as three grains every

two hours during the afternoon and night without producing any sleep

or even any contraction of the pupils. This resistance to the action

of opium was observed chiefly in the early part of the epidemic, and

we may add that it was exhibited chiefly when opium was given by the

mouth. When morphia was used hypodermically we found that one-fourth

of a grain, given at intervals of six to twelve hours, afforded very

great relief to the pains, aided and relieved vomiting, and often

induced quiet, refreshing sleep. Its use was not contraindicated by

jaundice, by cough or pulmonary congestion, or by moderate contraction

of the pupils. It was frequently given so as to maintain decided

drowsiness throughout the pyrexia. When the pains persisted during the

intermission the morphia was continued in smaller doses or at longer

intervals. It occasionally happened that when patients were thus kept

continuously under opium influence no relapse occurred; but here, as

in regard to the action of quinine, it may safely be asserted either

that what was regarded as the initial paroxysm was in reality the

relapse, or else that the absence of a relapse was a mere

irregularity, and in no way to be attributed to the action of the

opium. On the other hand, in cases presenting a tendency to the

typhoid state, with a disposition to stupor, or where the urine was

scanty and albuminous, no opiate was administered.

[Footnote 42: _Loc. cit._]

We have already stated that in our cases quinine in acid solution was

frequently ordered, and it answered very well to add to each dose of

this a suitable amount of morphia.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 · 第 55 / 149 段