The intimacy of relation between tuberculosis and pearly distemper is

a necessary result of Villemin's[62] experiment, in which the rabbit

became tuberculous after inoculation with fragments of the pearly

tumor. Gerlach,[63] and especially Schüppel,[64] showed that the

structure of the nodules of the pearly distemper is the same as that

of the tubercles of man, and that the two diseases are identical from

the histological point of view.

[Footnote 62: _Op. cit._, 537.]

[Footnote 63: _Virchow's Archiv_, 1870, li. 290.]

[Footnote 64: _Ibid._, 1872, lvi. 38.]

From the anatomical identification and the etiological connection, as

shown by Villemin, Gerlach, and Aufrecht, the pearly distemper became

designated as a bovine tuberculosis.

The experiments of Villemin were further productive in leading to the

discovery by Koch of the bacillus tuberculosis. It was early obvious

that certain cheesy material and gray tubercles possessed the

infectious qualities, and Villemin[65] maintained that the immediate

cause of the latter was a germ introduced from without, which

propagated and perpetuated itself in man and certain animals. This

view acquired prominence through the investigations of Klebs, who in

1877 claimed to have isolated the micrococci which produced tubercles

when injected into animals. Three years later Schüller[66] confirmed

the statements of Klebs, and asserted that he had been enabled to

obtain infective micrococci by cultivation from {100} miliary

tubercles, scrofulous glands and joints, and from the tissue of lupus.

Aufrecht[67] found micrococci, single and in chains, and short

glistening rods, within tubercles resulting from inoculation with

material from pearly tumors. The same organisms were found in

tubercles produced by the inoculation of tubercles from man, and he

regarded these rod-shaped bodies as the specific element productive of

miliary tuberculosis.

[Footnote 65: _Op. cit._, 620.]

[Footnote 66: _Op. cit._, 55.]

[Footnote 67: _Pathologische Mittheilungen_, 1881, p. 43.]

The isolation of the virus of tubercle was thus regarded as an open

question till the announcement by Koch[68] of the constant presence of

a hitherto unknown, characteristic, well defined organism in all

tuberculous affections, which, when isolated and introduced into

animals, produced tuberculosis, the resulting tubercles likewise

containing the organism.

[Footnote 68: _Berliner klinische Wochenschrift_, 1882, p. 15.]

The latter, the bacillus tuberculosis, was to be seen in preparations

methodically treated and carefully stained with aniline colors, by all

of which, excepting the browns, the bacillus was tinged. It was found

in miliary tubercles of the lung, cerebral and intestinal tubercle,

cheesy bronchitis and pneumonia, phthisical sputa, scrofulous glands,

and fungous inflammation of the joints. It was also seen in the

nodules of pearly distemper and in the cheesy masses from the lungs of

cattle. It was furthermore met with in the cheesy lymphatic glands of

swine, in the tubercular nodules of a fowl, and in the tubercles of

guinea-pigs, rabbits, and monkeys. The bacilli were likewise found in

the tubercles resulting from the inoculation of animals with

tubercular virus from its various sources.

The microphytes were described as very slender rods, varying in length

from one-fourth the diameter of a red blood-corpuscle to its entire

diameter, and spores were occasionally seen within the rods. In shape

and size they resembled the bacilli of leprosy, but the latter were

narrower and pointed at the ends. They were found in greatest

abundance when the tuberculous process was recent and rapidly

advancing, and were present within, as well as between, cells. The

younger giant-cells contained them in larger numbers than the older

forms. They were present at the periphery of cheesy nodules rather

than at the centre.

The bacilli were cultivated through successive generations and

required a temperature of between 30° C. and 41° C. (86° F.-105.8° F.)

for their development, one of 37° C. or 38° C. (98.6° F. or 100.4° F.)

being the most favorable. The crop first became apparent on the tenth

day after sowing, and the growth extended through a period of three to

four weeks, forming a compact scale. The cultivated bacilli, even

propagated through several generations, when inoculated, produced the

same positive results as follow the inoculation of fragments of

tuberculous material, although animals might be used which are not

easily infected with tuberculosis.

Koch's publication was immediately followed by a statement from

Baumgarten[69] of his discovery of rod-like bacteria in the tubercles

of rabbits resulting from the inoculation with pearly masses, and in

the pleural and pericardial tubercles of man. They were made evident

by treating the sections for microscopic examination with very dilute

solutions of soda or potash.

[Footnote 69: _Centralblatt für die med. Wissenschaften_, 1882, xv.

257.]

{101} The discoveries of Koch thus show that the production of

tuberculosis is dependent upon the presence of distinctive bacilli,

and that these bacilli are present not only in miliary tubercles, but

in scrofulous glands and joints, in cheesy inflammation of the lungs,

and in the pearly distemper of animals. The identification of

tuberculosis with the pearly distemper and certain scrofulous

affections is thus established from the etiological as well as the

histological point of view.

As the bacilli are to be regarded as the virus of tuberculosis, so

their introduction into the human body is necessary for the production

of this disease in man. It is obvious, however, that other factors

than the virus are necessary, for not every one exposed to the

reception of tubercular bacilli becomes tuberculous. It may well be

that scrofula is still to be regarded as that condition of the solids

and liquids of the body which offers favorable opportunities for the

retention and growth of the bacilli, and thus for the production of

tuberculosis. Formad[70] claims that he has discovered structural

peculiarities of tissue as a cause for the scrofulous habit, which he

regards as synonymous with a predisposition to tuberculosis. These

peculiarities are manifested by a narrowness of the lymph-spaces and

their partial obliteration by cellular elements. He also maintains

that these features are not only of congenital origin, but may be

acquired through malnutrition and confinement.

[Footnote 70: _Studies from the Pathological Lab. of the Univ. of

Penna._, reprint, 1882, xi. 3.]

The occurrence of a local, circumscribed tuberculosis in extreme old

age, without antecedent or other concurrent evidence of scrofulous

disturbances, suggests that favorable opportunities for the

development of the tubercular bacillus may arise in advancing years.

In like manner, the frequent termination in phthisis of cases of

diabetes suggests the likelihood of tuberculous inflammation arising

in the absence of any evidence of previous scrofulous or tuberculous

disease. The scrofulous condition or constitution, as indicated by

vulnerable tissues, with a protracted course of inflammations, and a

persistence of their products, with a tendency to cheesy degeneration,

may still exist without a sign of tuberculosis. Those who claim that

scrofula and tuberculosis are identical must, in the light of Koch's

discovery, demonstrate the presence of the bacillus in all scrofulous

inflammations, and deny the existence of scrofula apart from

indisputable manifestations of the activity of the bacilli of

tuberculosis. It may be that such evidence will be presented; until it

is collected scrofula and tuberculosis are to be regarded as distinct

though often coexistent. The scrofulous person is frequently

tuberculous, the tuberculous person is usually scrofulous; the

non-scrofulous person, however, may die of tuberculosis, while the

individual may be scrofulous without containing tubercle.

The actual inheritance of tuberculosis is very unlikely, although this

disease is frequently found in successive generations of a single

family. The various members of the family are rather to be regarded as

furnishing a suitable soil for the growth of the tubercular bacillus,

and their exposure to its seed is favored by the existence of

tuberculosis in one or more members of the household. The scrofulous

condition is still to be regarded as hereditary as well as acquired,

and the scrofulous remain as the class to be especially protected from

the reception and effects of the bacilli of tuberculosis.

{102} It is obviously a matter of importance to determine in any given

case of phthisis whether bacilli are present or absent. A ready means

of ascertaining this fact is offered by the examination of the sputum

in cases of pulmonary phthisis, the feces in intestinal phthisis, the

urine in renal phthisis, and the aspirated pus in cases of supposed

tuberculosis of the joints. Koch has found in examining the sputa from

numerous cases of phthisis that the bacilli were present in one-half

the number, and that they were absent from the sputa of individuals

who were not phthisical. Balmer and Fraentzel[71] have found bacilli

in the sputum from one hundred and twenty cases of phthisis, and

concluded that the progress of a case of pulmonary tuberculosis might

be readily determined from the number and degree of development of the

typical bacilli present in the sputum. The more numerous and

well-developed bacilli, with distinct and constant spores, were found

in the graver cases, which advanced more rapidly. The sputum of the

protracted cases contained few, small, and thin bacilli with scanty

spores. The presence of fever was associated with numerous bacilli,

while its absence was noted in those cases where but few were present.

[Footnote 71: _Berliner klinische Wochenschrift_, 1882, xlv. 679.]

The bacilli are readily detected by means of the staining method

devised by Koch. Various modifications have been presented from time

to time, of which that of Ehrlich[72] has proved the most

satisfactory. The essential features are to obtain a dry, thin layer

of a selected portion of the suspected sputum, which is then to be

deeply stained with fuchsin or methyl-violet; the excess of color is

to be removed with nitric acid, and the preparation is then ready for

examination with the microscope. A power of four or five hundred

diameters is sufficient for the recognition, and the object should be

illuminated with a flood of light through a large diaphragm or an

achromatic condenser. The bacillus retains the color notwithstanding

its exposure to the acid, and the violet colors are more strongly

presented if the preparation is tinted yellow after the action of the

acid. If the bacilli are stained red with fuchsin, the background

should be made blue. It is important that the reagents should be

freshly prepared and filtered, that other bacteria may not obscure the

picture, and that all the apparatus employed should be thoroughly

clean.

[Footnote 72: _Allg. med. Centr. Zeitung_, 1882, xxxvii. 458.]

A fragment of thick, opaque sputum is to be taken in forceps, placed

on a cover-glass, and spread into a thin layer by means of a second

cover-glass. The prepared slide is then to be passed slowly through an

alcoholic flame, or that of a Bunsen burner, till the layer of sputum

is dried. A saturated alcoholic solution of methyl-violet or fuchsin

is made and filtered, and added, drop by drop, to a filtered,

saturated solution of aniline oil shaken in water. The color is to be

added with stirring till an opalescent film forms on the surface of

the mixture. The slide containing the dried sputum is to be placed in

or on this staining fluid, and allowed to remain for half an hour or

less, the application of warmth hastening the process, when it is

removed, and the specimen is decolorized in a solution of one part of

nitric acid and two parts of water. The preparation is then washed in

water, and may be examined directly in water, glycerin, or, after

dehydration in alcohol, in oil of cloves. The tinted bacilli are made

more prominent by a secondary staining, for a minute or two, of the

red (fuchsin) preparation {103} in a concentrated solution of

methyl-blue, the violet preparation being secondarily stained in a

like solution of aniline-brown. If the preparation is to be

permanently preserved, it should be dehydrated in strong alcohol after

washing with water, and it may then be treated with oil of cloves and

mounted in Canada balsam.

After the observer has become thoroughly familiar with the tubercle

bacilli by means of the method of Ehrlich, much time may be saved by

following that of Baumgarten.[73] The cover-glass bearing the dried

sputum is placed in a very dilute solution of caustic potash (two

drops of a 33 per cent. solution in a watch-glass of distilled water)

till the layer of sputum becomes transparent. The cover is then placed

on a slide moistened with a drop of water, tapped slightly, and

examined with the microscope. The bacilli are readily seen, and may be

differentiated from other varieties of bacteria, if necessary, by

again drying the object and examining it in a drop of a dilute watery

solution of aniline-violet or of other preparations of aniline used

for staining nuclei. The tubercle bacilli remain unstained, while

putrefactive bacteria are tinted.

[Footnote 73: _Centralblatt für die med. Wissenschaften_, 1882, xxv.

433.]

The tubercular products of the invasion of the body by the bacillus

tuberculosis are regarded as primary or secondary, according as they

are present at that part of the body which directly receives the

organisms or as they are dependent upon the transfer of the latter to

parts remote from the region of their admission and immediate effects.

This differing relation is also expressed by the terms local and

general tuberculosis. In the former the bacilli excite the growth of

tubercle only at a given part of the body. Their apparent effects may

be wholly limited to this region, and it not rarely happens that the

same is quite distant from the channels through which the bacilli are

admitted. A general tuberculosis occurs when the latter are

disseminated over the body, and their effects, especially the

production of numerous tubercles, are found at various parts. The

dissemination may take place at the time of entrance, or, as is more

commonly the case, apparently occurs at some subsequent period, the

immediate disturbances being localized at a given portion of the body.

The necessary conditions being here offered for the propagation of the

bacilli, their sudden distribution in great numbers is afterward

permitted when favorable opportunities arise for their absorption.

Such conditions are present when the local tubercular growths extend

into lymphatics or blood-vessels. The frequency with which scrofulous

glands are tuberculous--that is, contain miliary tubercles--is already

fully recognized, and a tuberculosis of the lymphatic glands is

essentially regional. These glands become affected in consequence of

disturbances, the local effects of which may have wholly disappeared,

in the region from which they receive their lymph. The cervical glands

become permanently enlarged, perhaps tuberculous, in connection with

persistent or recurrent inflammatory processes in the tonsils and

pharynx, the bronchial glands from similar bronchial or pulmonary

affections, and the mesenteric glands from like intestinal

disturbances. In such instances, the direct reception of the bacilli

into the lymph-current is assumed rather than demonstrated from a

knowledge of the possibilities of absorption and an appreciation of

the conditions in the glands.

That an actual growth of tubercles from the wall of the intestinal

{104} lymphatics may take place has long been known, and Ponfick has

recently discovered that tubercles may be found growing from the wall

of the thoracic duct. The possibility of the direct admission into the

lymph-current of the infective element in tuberculosis is thus

apparent, and its indirect entrance into the blood-current is equally

obvious. That the bacillus of tubercle may be directly received into

the blood-current is likewise evident from the observations of

Weigert, who found tubercles growing from the walls of the pulmonary

blood-vessels, venous as well as arterial. This discovery of a

tuberculosis of the blood-vessels was confirmed by Klebs, who had

found a tuberculosis of the azygos veins. The occurrence of multiple

miliary tubercles of the pulmonary veins, especially near the place of

entrance of smaller branches, has been asserted by Mügge,[74] although

appearances similar to those described by him may be met with, due

simply to the agglomeration of white blood-corpuscles and their

necrosis. Such a condition simulates very closely the miliary

tubercle, but is usually analogous to the appearances figured by

Virchow,[75] and described by him as one of the phenomena of

coagulation. In his observation the white bodies were adherent to the

red clots, and were with them drawn from the pulmonary artery.

[Footnote 74: _Virchow's Archiv_, 1879, lxxvi. 243.]

[Footnote 75: _Die Cellular Pathologie_, 4te Auflage, 1871, 184.]

With the admission into the body, and the colonization of the

tubercular bacilli, their effects may either be progressive until the

death of the individual is occasioned, or, with the cessation of the

growth of the bacilli or a possible modification of their noxious

properties, recovery may ensue. The history of scrofulous glands, as

well as that of circumscribed pulmonary inflammation in scrofulous

persons, both presumably of a tuberculous nature, show that the

effects of an invasion of the parasites may be overcome.

The regions of the body which are usually the seat of a primary

tuberculosis are unquestionably the respiratory and intestinal tracts.

With regard to the first of these regions, the one most frequently

affected, there can be no doubt that in most instances the inhaled air

carries the bacilli or their spores, or both. Their constant presence

in the sputum of the frequent cases of tuberculous phthisis suggests a

ready means for their escape into the atmosphere. The well recognized

infective qualities of the sputum, as demonstrated by the various

experiments before the bacillus was discovered, demand the thorough

disinfection of phthisical sputa, since these are in all probability

the chief source of the dissemination of the disease.

The tuberculosis of the intestine in like manner is to be regarded in

the main as the result of an absorption from its surface of the

specific agent. An obvious direct means of the approach of the bacilli

is offered in the sputum, which, when swallowed, is likely to retain

its virulent properties. The frequent coexistence of chronic pulmonary

and intestinal tuberculosis is thus most readily explained. To what

extent the presence of the bacilli in the pearly distemper of cattle

and in the tuberculosis of other edible domesticated animals, as fowls

and swine, may lead to an infection of the intestinal wall, still

remains an unsolved problem. It is not yet determined at what

temperatures the bacilli are destroyed, although their growth takes

place only between 30° C. (86° F.) and {105} 41° C. (105.8° F.). The

inoculation of pearly masses produces tuberculosis in certain animals,

yet the effect of cooking in destroying the bacilli and their spores

is likely to prove of great importance. Aufrecht's[76] attempts at

inoculating rabbits with cooked pearly masses proved unsuccessful.

Schottelius[77] publishes an interesting series of observations

relating to the prolonged use of meat from cattle affected with the

pearly distemper, and shows that after a period of years no disease of

the nature of tuberculosis occurred among the one hundred and thirty

individuals included in the families concerned. Whatever may be the

value of this negative testimony, there is, as yet, no evidence on the

other side which satisfactorily determines the point in question--viz.

that the flesh of animals affected with pearly distemper produces

tuberculosis in the human consumer.

[Footnote 76: _Op. cit._, 51.]

[Footnote 77: _Virchow's Archiv_, 1883, xci. 129.]

The milk from cows thus diseased has likewise been regarded with

suspicion, and the frequency of intestinal tuberculosis among children

has been attributed to this source. Although the theoretical

possibility of the escape of the bacilli into the milk of cows

affected with pearly distemper is obvious, their presence in such milk

is first to be demonstrated under conditions which necessitate their

origin from the animal. If boiling the infective material for three

minutes destroys its virulence, as claimed by Aufrecht, a ready means

is offered of destroying the tubercle bacilli which may be present,

not only in the milk from animals affected with pearly distemper, but

in all milk which has been exposed for a certain time to an atmosphere

which may contain the bacilli of tuberculosis. In the light of our

present knowledge extreme hygienic precautions are only demanded in

those cases where such a congenital or acquired basis (constitution)

is present as facilitates the development of tuberculosis.

Morbid Growths.

In a system of practical medicine it is obviously important to include

under the head of Morbid Growths not only what is spoken of by the

surgeon as a tumor, but also those new formations of tissue which, in

virtue of their nature, seat, manner of growth, and retrograde

changes, produce an important series of disturbances in the

physiological processes of the individual. The surgeon deals

essentially with the swelling, which, producing irregularities in the

outline of the accessible surfaces of the body, is regarded as an

excrescence or outgrowth. It is important for him to realize the

nature of this swelling, that he may follow a different treatment for

the abscess, the wen, the watery accumulation, or the fleshy mass. The

last is the tumor in the limited sense; it is the growth which, though

called morbid, becomes so only in consequence of its presence being

associated with symptoms whose existence and persistence interfere

with the well-being of the possessor.

The physician, on the contrary, is more concerned with the tumor as a

growth than as a swelling. The latter element in deeply-seated

portions of the body may not be brought to his attention. The growth

takes place in such a manner as to be productive of certain symptoms

more or less serious, among which swelling is least obvious. The

morbid {106} growth to him becomes prominent as it displaces or

replaces normal tissues by those newly formed, which may or may not be

normal to the part in which the growth is situated. His tumor is

therefore a morbid growth, a new formation, a neoplasm or pseudoplasm,

rather than a swelling, a bunch, or an excrescence.

In a consideration of the general pathology of morbid growths the

first question which suggests itself relates to the method of origin

of the tumor. The tendency of the present seeks for a local cause, and

the most recent theory, that of Cohnheim, demands an accumulation of

dormant embryonal cells as such a cause. Cohnheim supports this view

by the experiments of Zahn and Leopold, which show that foetal

cartilage transplanted into the tissues of a mature animal may grow so

rapidly as to present the characteristics of a cartilaginous tumor,

while tissues transferred from the animal after birth do not increase

in size, but are usually absorbed.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 · 第 10 / 149 段