EDITORIAL REMARKS.

We have placed the whole of the letter of our correspondent in

Shepherdstown, (_See Letters from Correspondents_,) before our readers,

and we do it the more readily, as it contains some gentle thrusts at

ourselves, which we receive in very good part.

We take leave also to offer one or two words of explanation. The writer

is totally mistaken in supposing that in order to obtain admission into

the columns of the "Messenger," it is necessary that its contributors

should be personally known to the Publisher, or his Editorial

Auxiliaries, or that the contributors themselves should be individually

known to fame. The great design of the Messenger, from its commencement

to the present moment, has been much misconceived, if such an inference

has been deemed in the slightest degree warrantable. Its principal aim

has been, to foster and encourage native genius--no matter how obscure

or humble, and without inquiring whether the writer be a friend and

acquaintance, or a stranger. Its columns are open to the fair claims of

him who inhabits the lowly cottage, as well as of the proud tenant of a

wealthier mansion. That some articles have met with a kind reception

which did not deserve it, is extremely probable; and it is not less

probable, that some have been excluded, or hitherto suspended, for lack

of proper discrimination in our council of criticism. We will endeavor

to make amends however, by sharpening our optics a little in future;

and, if we cannot please all, we will strive to give offence to none.

Our correspondent we think, however, is a little harsh in his

criticisms. It is easy to select particular words or passages from any

production, and by showing partial defects, involve the whole in

ridicule or censure.

"A perfect judge will read each work of wit,

With the same spirit that its author writ;

Survey the whole, nor seek slight faults to find

Where nature moves, and rapture warms the mind."

We make this quotation from Pope, for the special benefit of our

Shepherdstown friend. Does he see no beauty, no merit, no poetry, in

the "Song of the Seasons?" We grant there are defects, and we

endeavored gently to point them out; but we still contend that the

writer (we have reason to believe him a very young man,) is endowed

with talents of no mean order. Who has written more quaintly and

obscurely than Ben Johnson or Cowley; or to come nearer to our own

time, than Wordsworth or Coleridge? And yet who will deny to either of

these bards the possession of genius. The remarks of our correspondent

upon "The Passage of the Beresina," are, we think, also couched in too

much severity. He seems to think there can be no good poetry without

exact metrical arrangement and harmony; but there are numerous examples

to the contrary. We do not say indeed that all his observations are

unjust, but some at least strike us as hypercritical. We take pleasure

in concurring with him however, in the high praise which he bestows

upon the two little poems which appeared in the last number, to wit:

"Beauty without Loveliness," and the lines to "Ianthe."

We hope that no one whose eye may light upon the fourth number of the

_Tripoline Sketches_, will forego the pleasure of reading it. The

energy and enterprise of our brave countryman, General Eaton, were

worthy to be recorded by such a pen. Note: We have to call the reader's

attention to a typographical transposition of _two_ words in the fourth

number of the "_Sketches_." In the first column of page 261, eleven

lines from bottom, instead of "_Mourad, joined the Turks, others sided

with the French_," read "Mourad, joined the French, others sided with

the Turks."

Impartial justice would have required the insertion of the answer to a

_Note to Blackstone's Commentaries_, even if it had not been demanded

by higher considerations. The author has won many a trophy on the field

of logic and eloquence; and even an adversary who should contend that

his weapons were pointless, would not deny that they were highly

polished, and dexterously wielded.

We are mistaken if the "_Romance of Real Life_" be not highly

commended.

We particularly invite the reader's attention to the fourth number of

the "_Letters from New England, by a Virginian_." It is replete with

interesting facts and reflections, presented in the writer's peculiarly

happy and forcible style.

The "_Extracts from my Mexican Journal_," are from a gentleman every

way qualified from his opportunities for accurate observation, to

present vivid pictures of the city of Montezuma and its environs. We

hope he will feel no reluctance to furnish us with further glances at

his journal.

Mr. Garnett's _Address before the Institute of Education at Hampden

Sidney College_, never before published, needs no commendation from us.

His ability as a writer, and his ardent zeal in the cause of education,

are well known to the public. To the graver portion of our readers,

especially such as have thought deeply upon the necessity of wise and

extended systems of instruction, and their intimate connexion with the

preservation of sound morals and rational liberty, this paper will be

particularly acceptable.

The "_Contrast_," by a lady, whose pen has heretofore charmed our

readers, will be read with interest. It is a touching illustration of

the consequences which await the love of pleasure and a life of

imprudence, as well as of the solid benefits which attend a contrary

course.

The second number of "_Hints to Students of Geology_," is a learned

epitome of the various theories with which geologists have puzzled

themselves and mankind. That absurd views have been entertained

concerning this science, does no more detract from its

importance,--than that because of the vain and visionary speculations

which were once indulged respecting astronomy, the now certain truths

of that sublime branch of knowledge should be discredited.

The "_Letters from a Sister_," which have reached their seventh in the

present number, increase in attraction. They will amply repay the

reader.

We cannot say that we coincide in every particular with the able and

eloquent author of the Review of the Orations of Messrs. Adams and

Everett on the death of La Fayette. Some of his criticisms are

undoubtedly just, but some perhaps have more _piquancy_ than the

subject deserved. We cannot concur in the sentiment that the fame of La

Fayette, or even of Washington, has placed either of those great men

superior to eulogy. The most sublime events and the most heroic actions

have generally found some poet or historian of sufficient

qualifications to record them with dignity and effect. Even the most

exalted truths which have ever dawned upon mankind,--the facts and

doctrines of revelation,--have lost none of their grandeur in the

simple narratives of plain and unlettered men. We somewhat fear too

that a few of the passages in the review may be supposed rather too

_political_ for a literary journal. We hope however that in this

respect our apprehensions are unfounded.

To the same vigorous pen however, we award all the praise which is due

for the judicious and discriminating notice of Mrs. Jameson's Book,

which appears in the present number.

We can fearlessly recommend the _poetry_ in this number,--if not

faultless, as at least superior to the carpings of illiberal and

puerile criticism. There are some little great men in the world, who

have the vanity to conceive that their taste and judgment (if they have

any) is the standard for all mankind--and if all do not exactly conform

to it, they snap and bark like the curs which infest our streets, and

annoy the by-ways. True criticism is the sentence of a liberal and

enlightened judgment, which delights as much in approving what is

worthy of praise, as in condemning what deserves censure. By such an

arbiter, and by such alone, let the specimens of native genius which we

now present to our readers be tried. Reluctant as we are to

discriminate, we cannot forbear to express the hope that the author of

"_Truth and Falsehood_," and another piece in the present

number,--will, from time to time, unfold his "Port Folio" for our

special use--and that he will delight others with some of those dulcet

strains with which he has beguiled his own toilsome and victorious

march in the severer paths of science.

The lines commencing "Oh! give me that oblivious draught," are

beautiful.

The southern literary messenger, Vol. I., No. 6, February, 1835 · 第 82 / 93 题