Without reckoning the constant libations needed for the gods and the

deceased, the workshops required a large quantity of drinking water for

the men engaged in them. In every gang of workmen, even in the present

day, two or three men are set apart to provide drinking-water for the

rest; in some arid places, indeed, at a distance from the river, such

as the Valley of the Kings, as many water-carriers are required as there

are workmen. To the trades just mentioned must be added the low-caste

crowd depending oh the burials of the rich, the acrobats, female

mourners, dancers and musicians. The majority of the female corporations

were distinguished by the infamous character of their manners, and

prostitution among them had come to be associated with the service of

the god.*

* The heroine of the erotic papyrus of Turin bears the title

of “Singing-woman of Amon,” and the illustrations indicate

her profession so clearly and so expressively, that no

details of her sayings and doings are wanting.

[Illustration: 049.jpg THE GODDESS MABÎTSAKBO]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Lanzone.

There was no education for all this mass of people, and their religion

was of a meagre character. They worshipped the official deities, Amon,

Mût, Isis, and Hâthor, and such deceased Pharaohs as Amenôthes I.

and Nofrîtari, but they had also their own Pantheon, in which animals

predominated--such as the goose of Amon, and his ram Pa-rahaninofir,

the good player on the horn, the hippopotamus, the cat, the chicken,

the swallow, and especially reptiles. Death was personified by a great

viper, the queen of the West, known by the name Marîtsakro, the friend

of silence. Three heads, or the single head of a woman, attached to the

one body, were assigned to it. It was supposed to dwell in the mountain

opposite Karnak, which fact gave to it, as well as to the necropolis

itself, the two epithets of Khafîtnîbûs and Ta-tahnît, that is, The

Summit.*

* The abundance of the monuments of Marîtsakro found at

Sheikh Abd el-Gurneh, inclines me to believe that her

sanctuary was situated in the neighbourhood of the temple of

Uazmosû, but there was also on the top of the hill another

sanctuary which would equally satisfy the name Ta-tahnît.

Its chapel was situated at the foot of the hill of Sheikh Abd el-Qurneh,

but its sacred serpents crawled and wriggled through the necropolis,

working miracles and effecting the cure of the most dangerous maladies.

The faithful were accustomed to dedicate to them, in payment of their

vows, stelas, or slabs of roughly hewn stone, with inscriptions

which witnessed to a deep gratitude. “Hearken! I, from the time of my

appearance on earth, I was a ‘Servant of the True Place,’ Nofirâbû, a

stupid ignorant person, who knew not good from evil, and I committed

sin against The Summit. She punished me, and I was in her hand day and

night. I lay groaning on my couch like a woman in childbed, and I made

supplication to the air, but it did not come to me, for I was hunted

down by The Summit of the West, the brave one among all the gods and all

the goddesses of the city; so I would say to all the miserable sinners

among the people of the necropolis: ‘Give heed to The Summit, for there

is a lion in The Summit, and she strikes as strikes a spell-casting

Lion, and she pursues him who sins against her! ‘I invoked then my

mistress, and I felt that she flew to me like a pleasant breeze;

she placed herself upon me, and this made me recognise her hand, and

appeased she returned to me, and she delivered me from suffering, for

she is my life, The Summit of the West, when she is appeased, and she

ought to be invoked!’” There were many sinners, we may believe, among

that ignorant and superstitious population, but the governors of Thebes

did not put their confidence in the local deities alone to keep them

within bounds, and to prevent their evil deeds; commissioners, with the

help of a detachment of Mazaîû, were an additional means of conducting

them into the right way. They had, in this respect, a hard work to

accomplish, for every day brought with it its contingent of crimes,

which they had to follow up, and secure the punishment of the authors.

Nsisûamon came to inform them that the workman Nakhtummaût and his

companions had stolen into his house, and robbed him of three large

loaves, eight cakes, and some pastry; they had also drunk a jar of beer,

and poured out from pure malice the oil which they could not carry

away with them. Panîbi had met the wife of a comrade alone near an

out-of-the-way tomb, and had taken advantage of her notwithstanding her

cries; this, moreover, was not the first offence of the culprit, for

several young girls had previously been victims of his brutality, and

had not ventured up to this time to complain of him on account of the

terror with which he inspired the neighbourhood. Crimes against the dead

were always common; every penniless fellow knew what quantities of gold

and jewels had been entombed with the departed, and these treasures,

scattered around them at only a few feet from the surface of the ground,

presented to them a constant temptation to which they often succumbed.

Some were not disposed to have accomplices, while others associated

together, and, having purchased at a serious cost the connivance of the

custodians, set boldly to work on tombs both recent and ancient. Not

content with stealing the funerary furniture, which they disposed of to

the undertakers, they stripped the mummies also, and smashed the

bodies in their efforts to secure the jewels; then, putting the remains

together again, they rearranged the mummies afresh so cleverly that

they can no longer be distinguished by their outward appearance from the

originals, and the first wrappings must be removed before the fraud can

be discovered. From time to time one of these rogues would allow himself

to be taken for the purpose of denouncing his comrades, and avenging

himself for the injustice of which he was the victim in the division

of the spoil; he was laid hold of by the Mazaîû, and brought before the

tribunal of justice. The lands situated on the left bank of the

Nile belonged partly to the king and partly to the god Amon, and any

infraction of the law in regard to the necropolis was almost certain

to come within the jurisdiction of one or other of them. The commission

appointed, therefore, to determine the damage done in any case, included

in many instances the high priest or his delegates, as well as the

officers of the Pharaoh. The office of this commission was to examine

into the state of the tombs, to interrogate the witnesses and the

accused, applying the torture if necessary: when they had got at the

facts, the tribunal of the notables condemned to impalement some half

a dozen of the poor wretches, and caused some score of others to be

whipped.* But, when two or three months had elapsed, the remembrance of

the punishment began to die away, and the depredations began afresh. The

low rate of wages occasioned, at fixed periods, outbursts of discontent

and trouble which ended in actual disturbances. The rations allowed to

each workman, and given to him at the beginning of each month, would

possibly have been sufficient for himself and his family, but, owing to

the usual lack of foresight in the Egyptian, they were often consumed

long before the time fixed, and the pinch soon began to be felt. The

workmen, demoralised by their involuntary abstinence, were not slow to

turn to the overseer; “We are perishing of hunger, and there are still

eighteen days before the next month.” The latter was prodigal of fair

speeches, but as his words were rarely accompanied by deeds, the

workmen would not listen to him; they stopped work, left the workshop in

turbulent crowds, ran with noisy demonstrations to some public place to

hold a meeting--perhaps the nearest monument, at the gate of the temple

of Thûtmosis III.,** behind the chapel of Mînephtah,*** or in the court

of that of Seti I.

* This is how I translate a fairly common expression, which

means literally, “to be put on the wood.” Spiegelberg sees in

this only a method of administering torture.

** Perhaps the chapel of Uazmôsû, or possibly the free space

before the temple of Deîr el-Baharî.

*** The site of this chapel was discovered by Prof. Petrie

in the spring of 1896. It had previously been supposed to be

a temple of Amenôthes III.

Their overseers followed them; the police commissioners of the locality,

the Mazaîû, and the scribes mingled with them and addressed themselves

to some of the leaders with whom they might be acquainted. But these

would not at first give them a hearing. “We will not return,” they would

say to the peacemakers; “make it clear to your superiors down below

there.” It must have been manifest that from their point of view their

complaints were well founded, and the official, who afterwards gave an

account of the affair to the authorities, was persuaded of this. “We

went to hear them, and they spoke true words to us.” For the most part

these strikes had no other consequence than a prolonged stoppage of

work, until the distribution of rations at the beginning of the next

month gave the malcontents courage to return to their tasks. Attempts

were made to prevent the recurrence of these troubles by changing

the method and time of payments. These were reduced to an interval of

fifteen days, and at length, indeed, to one of eight. The result was

very much the same as before: the workman, paid more frequently, did not

on that account become more prudent, and the hours of labour lost did

not decrease. The individual man, if he had had nobody to consider but

himself, might have put up with the hardships of his situation, but

there were almost always wife and children or sisters concerned, who

clamoured for bread in their hunger, and all the while the storehouses

of the temples or those of the state close by were filled to overflowing

with durrah, barley, and wheat.*

* Khonsu, for example, excites his comrades to pillage the

storehouses of the gate.

The temptation to break open the doors and to help themselves in the

present necessity must have been keenly felt. Some bold spirits among

the strikers, having set out together, scaled the two or three boundary

walls by which the granaries were protected, but having reached this

position their hearts, failed them, and they contented themselves with

sending to the chief custodian an eloquent pleader, to lay before him

their very humble request: “We are come, urged by famine, urged by

thirst, having no more linen, no more oil, no more fish, no more

vegetables. Send to Pharaoh, our master, send to the king, our lord,

that he may provide us with the necessaries of life.” If one of them,

with less self-restraint, was so carried away as to let drop an oath,

which was a capital offence, saying, “By Amon! by the sovereign, whose

anger is death!” if he asked to be taken before a magistrate in order

that he might reiterate there his complaint, the others interceded for

him, and begged that he might escape the punishment fixed by the law

for blasphemy; the scribe, good fellow as he was, closed his ears to the

oath, and, if it were in his power, made a beginning of satisfying their

demands by drawing upon the excess of past months to such an extent as

would pacify them for some days, and by paying them a supplemental wage

in the name of the Pharaoh. They cried out loudly: “Shall there not be

served out to us corn in excess of that which has been distributed to

us; if not we will not stir from this spot?”

At length the end of the month arrived, and they all appeared together

before the magistrates, when they said: “Let the scribe, Khâmoîsît,

who is accountable, be sent for!” He was thereupon brought before the

notables of the town, and they said to him: “See to the corn which thou

hast received, and give some of it to the people of the necropolis.”

Pmontunîboîsît was then sent for, and “rations of wheat were given to

us daily.” Famine was not caused only by the thriftlessness of the

multitude: administrators of all ranks did not hesitate to appropriate,

each one according to his position, a portion of the means entrusted

to them for the maintenance of their subordinates, and the latter often

received only instalments of what was due to them. The culprits often

escaped from their difficulties by either laying hold of half a dozen

of their brawling victims, or by yielding to them a proportion of

their ill-gotten gains, before a rumour of the outbreak could reach

head-quarters. It happened from time to time, however, when the

complaints against them were either too serious or too frequent, that

they were deprived of their functions, cited before the tribunals, and

condemned. What took place at Thebes was repeated with some variations

in each of the other large cities. Corruption, theft, and extortion had

prevailed among the officials from time immemorial, and the most active

kings alone were able to repress these abuses, or confine them within

narrow limits; as soon as discipline became relaxed, however, they began

to appear again, and we have no more convincing proof of the state of

decadence into which Thebes had fallen towards the middle of the XXth

dynasty, than the audacity of the crimes committed in the necropolis

during the reigns of the successors of Ramses III.

The priesthood of Amon alone displayed any vigour and enjoyed any

prosperity in the general decline. After the victory of the god over the

heretic kings no one dared to dispute his supremacy, and the Ramessides

displayed a devout humility before him and his ministers. Henceforward

he became united to Râ in a definite manner, and his authority not only

extended over the whole of the land of Egypt, but over all the countries

also which were brought within her influence; so that while Pharaoh

continued to be the greatest of kings, Pharaoh’s god held a position

of undivided supremacy among the deities. He was the chief of the two

Bnneads, the Heliopolitan and the Hermopolitan, and displayed for

the latter a special affection; for the vague character of its eight

secondary deities only served to accentuate the position of the ninth

and principal divinity with whose primacy that of Amon was identified.

It was more easy to attribute to Amon the entire work of creation when

Shû, Sibû, Osiris, and Sit had been excluded--the deities whom the

theologians of Heliopolis had been accustomed to associate with the

demiurge; and in the hymns which they sang at his solemn festivals they

did not hesitate to ascribe to him all the acts which the priests of

former times had assigned to the Ennead collectively. “He made earth,

silver, gold,--the true lapis at his good pleasure.--He brought forth

the herbs for the cattle, the plants upon which men live.--He made to

live the fish of the river,--the birds which hover in the air,--giving

air to those which are in the egg.--He animates the insects,--he makes

to live the small birds, the reptiles, and the gnats as well.--He

provides food for the rat in his hole,--supports the bird upon the

branch.--May he be blessed for all this, he who is alone, but with many

hands.” “Men spring from his two eyes,” and quickly do they lose

their breath while acclaiming him--Egyptians and Libyans, Negroes and

Asiatics: “Hail to thee!” they all say; “praise to thee because thou

dwellest amongst us!--Obeisances before thee because thou createst

us!”--“Thou art blessed by every living thing,--thou hast worshippers in

every place,--in the highest of the heavens, in all the breadth of

the earth,--in the depths of the seas.--The gods bow before thy

Majesty,--magnifying the souls which form them,--rejoicing at meeting

those who have begotten them,--they say to thee: ‘Go in peace,--father

of the fathers of all the gods,--who suspended the heaven, levelled the

earth;--creator of beings, maker of things,--sovereign king, chief of

the gods,--we adore thy souls, because thou hast made us,--we lavish

offerings upon thee, because thou hast given us birth,--we shower

benedictions upon thee, because thou dwellest among us.’” We have here

the same ideas as those which predominate in the hymns addressed to

Atonû,* and in the prayers directed to Phtah, the Nile, Shû, and the

Sun-god of Heliopolis at the same period.

* Breasted points out the decisive influence exercised by

the solar hymns of Amenôthes IV. on the development of the

solar ideas contained in the hymns to Amon put forth or re-

edited in the XXIIIrd dynasty.

The idea of a single god, lord and maker of all things, continued to

prevail more and more throughout Egypt--not, indeed, among the lower

classes who persisted in the worship of their genii and their animals,

but among the royal family, the priests, the nobles, and people of

culture. The latter believed that the Sun-god had at length absorbed

all the various beings who had been manifested in the feudal divinities:

these, in fact, had surrendered their original characteristics in order

to become forms of the Sun, Amon as well as the others--and the new

belief displayed itself in magnifying the solar deity, but the solar

deity united with the Theban Amon, that is, Amon-Râ. The omnipotence of

this one god did not, however, exclude a belief in the existence of his

compeers; the theologians thought all the while that the beings to whom

ancient generations had accorded a complete independence in respect of

their rivals were nothing more than emanations from one supreme being.

If local pride forced them to apply to this single deity the designation

customarily used in their city--Phtah at Memphis, Anhûri-Shû at Thinis,

Khnûmû in the neighbourhood of the first cataract--they were quite

willing to allow, at the same time, that these appellations were but

various masks for one face. Phtah, Hâpi, Khnûmû, Râ,--all the gods, in

fact,--were blended with each other, and formed but one deity--a unique

existence, multiple in his names, and mighty according to the importance

of the city in which he was worshipped. Hence Amon, lord of the capital

and patron of the dynasty, having more partisans, enjoyed more respect,

and, in a word, felt himself possessed of more claims to be the sole god

of Egypt than his brethren, who could not claim so many worshippers. He

did not at the outset arrogate to himself the same empire over the dead

as he exercised over the living; he had delegated his functions in this

respect to a goddess, Marîtsakro, for whom the poorer inhabitants of the

left bank entertained a persistent devotion. She was a kind of Isis or

hospitable Hathor, whose subjects in the other world adapted themselves

to the nebulous and dreary existence provided for their disembodied

“doubles.” The Osirian and solar doctrines were afterwards blended

together in this local mythology, and from the XIth dynasty onwards the

Theban nobility had adopted, along with the ceremonies in use in the

Memphite period, the Heliopolitan beliefs concerning the wanderings

of the soul in the west, its embarkation on the solar ship, and its

resting-places in the fields of Ialû. The rock-tombs of the XVIIIth

dynasty demonstrate that the Thebans had then no different concept of

their life beyond the world from that entertained by the inhabitants

of the most ancient cities: they ascribed to that existence the same

inconsistent medley of contradictory ideas, from which each one might

select what pleased him best--either repose in a well-provisioned tomb,

or a dwelling close to Osiris in the middle of a calm and agreeable

paradise, or voyages with Râ around the world.*

* The Pyramid texts are found for the most part in the tombs

of Nofirû and Harhôtpû; the texts of the Book of the Dead

are met with on the Theban coffins of the same period.

[Illustration: 060.jpg DECORATED WRAPPINGS OF A MUMMY]

The fusion of Râ and Amon, and the predominance of the solar idea which

arose from it, forced the theologians to examine more closely these

inconsistent notions, and to eliminate from them anything which might be

out of harmony with the new views. The devout servant of Amon, desirous

of keeping in constant touch with his god both here and in the other

would, could not imagine a happier future for his soul than in its going

forth in the fulness of light by day, and taking refuge by night on

the very bark which carried the object of his worship through the thick

darkness of, Hades. To this end he endeavoured to collect the formulae

which would enable him to attain to this supreme happiness, and also

inform him concerning the hidden mysteries of that obscure half of the

world in which the sun dwelt between daylight and daylight, teaching him

also how to make friends and supporters of the benevolent genii, and how

to avoid or defeat the monsters whom he would encounter. The best

known of the books relating to these mysteries contained a geographical

description of the future world as it was described by the Theban

priests towards the end of the Ramesside period; it was, in fact, an

itinerary in which was depicted each separate region of the underworld,

with its gates, buildings, and inhabitants.*

* The monumental text of this book is found sculptured on a

certain number of the tombs of the Theban kings. It was

first translated into English by Birch, then into French by

Dévéria, and by Maspero.

The account of it given by the Egyptian theologians did not exhibit much

inventive genius. They had started with the theory that the sun, after

setting exactly west of Thebes, rose again due east of the city, and

they therefore placed in the dark hemisphere all the regions of the

universe which lay to the north of those two points of the compass. The

first stage of the sun’s journey, after disappearing below the horizon,

coincided with the period of twilight; the orb travelled along the open

sky, diminishing the brightness of his fires as he climbed northward,

and did not actually enter the underworld till he reached Abydos,

close to the spot where, at the “Mouth of the Cleft,” the souls of the

faithful awaited him. As soon as he had received them into his boat,

he plunged into the tunnel which there pierces the mountains, and the

cities through which he first passed between Abydos and the Fayûm were

known as the Osirian fiefs. He continued his journey through them for

the space of two hours, receiving the homage of the inhabitants, and

putting such of the shades on shore as were predestined by their special

devotion for the Osiris of Abydos and his associates, Horus and Anubis,

to establish themselves in this territory. Beyond Heracleopolis, he

entered the domains of the Memphite gods, the “land of Sokaris,” and

this probably was the most perilous moment of his journey.

[Illustration: 062.jpg ONE OF THE MYSTERIOUS BOOKS OF AMON]

The feudatories of Phtah were gathered together in grottoes, connected

by a labyrinth of narrow passages through which even the most fully

initiated were scarcely able to find their way; the luminous boat,

instead of venturing within these catacombs, passed above them by

mysterious tracks. The crew were unable to catch a glimpse of the

sovereign through whose realm they journeyed, and they in like manner

were invisible to him; he could only hear the voices of the divine

sailors, and he answered them from the depth of the darkness. Two hours

were spent in this obscure passage, after which navigation became easier

as the vessel entered the nomes subject to the Osirises of the Delta:

four consecutive hours of sailing brought the bark from the province in

which the four principal bodies of the god slept to that in which

his four souls kept watch, and, as it passed, it illuminated the eight

circles reserved for men and kings who worshipped the god of Mendes.

From the tenth hour onwards it directed its course due south, and passed

through the Aûgàrît, the place of fire and abysmal waters to which the

Heliopolitans consigned the souls of the impious; then finally quitting

the tunnel, it soared up in the east with the first blush of dawn. Each

of the ordinary dead was landed at that particular hour of the twelve,

which belonged to the god of his choice or of his native town. Left to

dwell there they suffered no absolute torment, but languished in the

darkness in a kind of painful torpor, from which condition the approach

of the bark alone was able to rouse them. They hailed its daily coming

with acclamations, and felt new life during the hour in which its rays

fell on them, breaking out into lamentations as the bark passed away and

the light disappeared with it. The souls who were devotees of the sun

escaped this melancholy existence; they escorted the god, reduced though

he was to a mummied corpse, on his nightly cruise, and were piloted by

him safe and sound to meet the first streaks of the new day. As the

boat issued from the mountain in the morning between the two trees which

flanked the gate of the east, these souls had their choice of several

ways of spending the day on which they were about to enter. They might

join their risen god in his course through the hours of light, and

assist him in combating Apophis and his accomplices, plunging again at

night into Hades without having even for a moment quitted his side.

[Illustration: 066.jpg THE ENTRANCE TO A ROYAL TOMB]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph, by Beato, of the

tomb of Ramses IV.

[Illustration: 066b.jpg ONE OF THE HOURS OF THE NIGHT]

They might, on the other hand, leave him and once more enter the world

of the living, settling themselves where they would, but always by

preference in the tombs where their bodies awaited them, and where they

could enjoy the wealth which had been accumulated there: they might walk

within their garden, and sit beneath the trees they had planted; they

could enjoy the open air beside the pond they had dug, and breathe the

gentle north breeze on its banks after the midday heat, until the time

when the returning evening obliged them to repair once more to Abydos,

and re-embark with the god in order to pass the anxious vigils of the

night under his protection. Thus from the earliest period of Egyptian

history the life beyond the tomb was an eclectic one, made up of a

series of earthly enjoyments combined together.

The Pharaohs had enrolled themselves instinctively among the most ardent

votaries of this complex doctrine. Their relationship to the sun made

its adoption a duty, and its profession was originally, perhaps, one of

the privileges of their position. Râ invited them on board because they

were his children, subsequently extending this favour to those whom

they should deem worthy to be associated with them, and thus become

companions of the ancient deceased kings of Upper and Lower Egypt.*

* This is apparently what we gather from the picture

inserted in chapter xvii. of the “Book of the Dead,” where

we see the kings of Upper and Lower Egypt guiding the divine

bark and the deceased with them.

The idea which the Egyptians thus formed of the other world, and of the

life of the initiated within it, reacted gradually on their concept of

the tomb and of its befitting decoration. They began to consider the

entrances to the pyramid, and its internal passages and chambers, as a

conventional representation of the gates, passages, and halls of Hades

itself; when the pyramid passed out of fashion, and they had replaced

it by a tomb cut in the rock in one or other of the branches of the Bab

el-Moluk valley, the plan of construction which they chose was an exact

copy of that employed by the Memphites and earlier Thebans, and they

hollowed out for themselves in the mountain-side a burying-place on the

same lines as those formerly employed within the pyramidal structure.

The relative positions of the tunnelled tombs along the valley were not

determined by any order of rank or of succession to the throne; each

Pharaoh after Ramses I. set to work on that part of the rock where the

character of the stone favoured his purpose, and displayed so little

respect for his predecessors, that the workmen, after having tunnelled

a gallery, were often obliged to abandon it altogether, or to change the

direction of their excavations so as to avoid piercing a neighbouring

tomb. The architect’s design was usually a mere project which could be

modified at will, and, which he did not feel bound to carry out with

fidelity; the actual measurements of the tomb of Ramses IV. are almost

everywhere at variance with the numbers and arrangement of the working

drawing of it which has been preserved to us in a papyrus. The general

disposition of the royal tombs, however, is far from being complicated;

we have at the entrance the rectangular door, usually surmounted by the

sun, represented by a yellow disk, before which the sovereign kneels

with his hands raised in the posture of adoration; this gave access to

a passage sloping gently downwards, and broken here and there by a level

landing and steps, leading to a first chamber of varying amplitude, at

the further end of which a second passage opened which descended to one

or more apartments, the last of which, contained the coffin. The oldest

rock-tombs present some noteworthy exceptions to this plan, particularly

those of Seti I. and Ramses III.; but from the time of Ramses IV., there

is no difference to be remarked in them except in the degree of finish

of the wall-paintings or in the length of the passages. The shortest of

the latter extends some fifty-two feet into the rock, while the longest

never exceeds three hundred and ninety feet. The same artifices

which had been used by the pyramid-builders to defeat the designs of

robbers--false mummy-pits, painted and sculptured walls built across

passages, stairs concealed under a movable stone in the corner of a

chamber--were also employed by the Theban engineers. The decoration of

the walls was suggested, as in earlier times, by the needs of the royal

soul, with this difference--that the Thebans set themselves to render

visible to his eyes by paintings that which the Memphites had been

content to present to his intelligence in writing, so that the Pharaoh

could now see what his ancestors had been able merely to read on the

walls of their tombs. Where the inscribed texts in the burial-chamber

of Unas state that Unas, incarnate in the Sun, and thus representing

Osiris, sails over the waters on high or glides into the Elysian fields,

the sculptured or painted scenes in the interior of the Theban catacombs

display to the eye Ramses occupying the place of the god in the solar

bark and in the fields of laid. Where the walls of Unas bear only the

prayers recited over the mummy for the opening of his mouth, for the

restoration of the use of his limbs, for his clothing, perfuming, and

nourishment, we see depicted on those of Seti I. or Ramses IV. the

mummies of these kings and the statues of their doubles in the hands

of the priests, who are portrayed in the performance of these various

offices. The starry ceilings of the pyramids reproduce the aspect of the

sky, but without giving the names of the stars: on the ceilings of some

of the Ramesside rock-tombs, on the other hand, the constellations are

represented, each with its proper figure, while astronomical tables give

the position of the heavenly bodies at intervals of fifteen days, so

that the soul could tell at a glance into what region of the firmament

the course of the bark would bring him each night. In the earlier

Ramesside tombs, under Seti I. and Ramses II., the execution of these

subjects shows evidence of a care and skill which are quite marvellous,

and both figures and hieroglyphics betray the hand of accomplished

artists. But in the tomb of Ramses III. the work has already begun to

show signs of inferiority, and the majority of the scenes are coloured

in a very summary fashion; a raw yellow predominates, and the tones of

the reds and blues remind us of a child’s first efforts at painting.

This decline is even more marked under the succeeding Ramessides; the

drawing has deteriorated, the tints have become more and more crude,

and the latest paintings seem but a lamentable caricature of the earlier

ones.

The courtiers and all those connected with the worship of

Amon-Râ--priests, prophets, singers, and functionaries connected with

the necropolis--shared the same belief with regard to the future world

as their sovereign, and they carried their faith in the sun’s power

to the point of identifying themselves with him after death, and of

substituting the name of Râ for that of Osiris; they either did not

venture, however, to go further than this, or were unable to introduce

into their tombs all that we find in the Bab el-Moluk. They confined

themselves to writing briefly on their own coffins, or confiding to

the mummies of their fellow-believers, in addition to the “Book of the

Dead,” a copy of the “Book of knowing what there is in Hades,” or of

some other mystic writing which was in harmony with their creed. Hastily

prepared copies of these were sold by unscrupulous scribes, often badly

written and almost always incomplete, in which were hurriedly set

down haphazard the episodes of the course of the sun with explanatory

illustrations. The representations of the gods in them are but little

better than caricatures, the text is full of faults and scarcely

decipherable, and it is at times difficult to recognize the

correspondence of the scenes and prayers with those in the royal tombs.

Although Amon had become the supreme god, at least for this class of

the initiated, he was by no means the sole deity worshipped by the

Egyptians: the other divinities previously associated with him still

held their own beside him, or were further defined and invested with

a more decided personality. The goddess regarded as his partner was at

first represented as childless, in spite of the name of Maût or Mût--the

mother--by which she was invoked, and Amon was supposed to have adopted

Montû, the god of Hermonthis, in order to complete his triad. Montû,

however, formerly the sovereign of the Theban plain, and lord over Amon

himself, was of too exalted a rank to play the inferior part of a divine

son.

[Illustration: 074.jpg KHONSÛ* AND TEMPLE OF KHONSÛ**.]

* Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a bronze statuette in the

Gizeh Museum.

** Drawn by Thuillier: A is the pylon, B the court, C the

hypostyle hall, E the passage isolating the sanctuary, D the

sanctuary, F the opisthodomos with its usual chambers.

The priests were, therefore, obliged to fall back upon a personage

of lesser importance, named Khonsû, who up to that period had been

relegated to an obscure position in the celestial hierarchy. How they

came to identify him with the moon, and subsequently with Osiris and

Thot, is as yet unexplained,* but the assimilation had taken place

before the XIXth dynasty drew to its close. Khonsû, thus honoured, soon

became a favourite deity with both the people and the upper classes,

at first merely supplementing Montû, but finally supplanting him in the

third place of the Triad. From the time of Sesostris onwards, Theban

dogma acknowledged him alone side by side with Amon-Râ and Mût the

divine mother.

* It is possible that this assimilation originated in the

fact that Khonsû is derived from the verb “khonsû,” to

navigate: Khonsû would thus have been he who crossed the

heavens in his bark--that is, the moon-god.

[Illustration: 075.jpg THE TEMPLE OF KHONSÛ AT KARNAK]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

It was now incumbent on the Pharaoh to erect to this newly made

favourite a temple whose size and magnificence should be worthy of the

rank to which his votaries had exalted him. To this end, Ramses III.

chose a suitable site to the south of the hypostyle hall of Karnak,

close to a corner of the enclosing wall, and there laid the foundations

of a temple which his successors took nearly a century to finish.*

* The proof that the temple was founded by Ramses III. is

furnished by the inscriptions of the sanctuary and the

surrounding chambers.

Its proportions are by no means perfect, the sculpture is wanting in

refinement, the painting is coarse, and the masonry was so faulty, that

it was found necessary in several places to cover it with a coat of

stucco before the bas-reliefs could be carved on the walls; yet, in

spite of all this, its general arrangement is so fine, that it may

well be regarded, in preference to other more graceful or magnificent

buildings, as the typical temple of the Theban period. It is divided

into two parts, separated from each other by a solid wall. In the centre

of the smaller of these is placed the Holy of Holies, which opens

at both ends into a passage ten feet in width, isolating it from the

surrounding buildings. To the right and left of the sanctuary are dark

chambers, and behind it is a hall supported by four columns, into which

open seven small apartments. This formed the dwelling-place of the god

and his compeers. The sanctuary communicates, by means of two doors

placed in the southern wall, with a hypostyle hall of greater width

than depth, divided by its pillars into a nave and two aisles. The

four columns of the nave are twenty-three feet in height, and have

bell-shaped capitals, while those of the aisles, two on either side, are

eighteen feet high, and are crowned with lotiform capitals.

[Illustration: 077.jpg THE COURT OF THE TEMPLE OF KHONSÛ]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

The roof of the nave was thus five feet higher than those of the aisles,

and in the clear storey thus formed, stone gratings, similar to those

in the temple of Amon, admitted light to the building. The courtyard,

surrounded by a fine colonnade of two rows of columns, was square, and

was entered by four side posterns in addition to the open gateway at the

end placed between two quadrangular towers.

[Illustration: 078.jpg THE COLONNADE BUILT BY THÛTMOSIS III]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Insinger and

Daniel Héron.

This pylon measures 104 feet in length, and is 32 feet 6 inches wide,

by 58 feet high. It contains no internal chambers, but merely a narrow

staircase which leads to the top of the doorway, and thence to the

summit of the towers. Four long angular grooves run up the façade of the

towers to a height of about twenty feet from the ground, and are in

the same line with a similar number of square holes which pierce the

thickness of the building higher up. In these grooves were placed

Venetian masts, made of poles spliced together and held in their place

by means of hooks and wooden stays which projected from the four holes;

these masts were to carry at their tops pennons of various colours.

Such was the temple of Khonsû, and the majority of the great Theban

buildings--at Luxor, Qurneh, and Bamesseum, or Medinet-Uabu--were

constructed on similar lines. Even in their half-ruined condition there

is something oppressive and uncanny in their appearance. The gods

loved to shroud themselves in mystery, and, therefore, the plan of

the building was so arranged as to render the transition almost

imperceptible from the blinding sunlight outside to the darkness of

their retreat within. In the courtyard, we are still surrounded by vast

spaces to which air and light have free access. The hypostyle hall,

however, is pervaded by an appropriate twilight, the sanctuary is veiled

in still deeper darkness, while in the chambers beyond reigns an almost

perpetual night. The effect produced by this gradation of obscurity

was intensified by constructional artifices. The different parts of the

building are not all on the same ground-level, the pavement rising as

the sanctuary is approached, and the rise is concealed by a few steps

placed at intervals. The difference of level in the temple of Khonsû is

not more than five feet three inches, but it is combined with a still

more considerable lowering of the height of the roof. From the pylon

to the wall at the further end the height decreases as we go on; the

peristyle is more lofty than the hypostyle hall, this again is higher

than the sanctuary and the hall of columns, and the chamber beyond it

drops still further in altitude.*

* This is “the law of progressive diminution of heights” of

Perrot-Chipiez.

Karnak is an exception to this rule; this temple had in the course of

centuries undergone so many restorations and additions, that it formed a

collection of buildings rather than a single edifice. It might have

been regarded, as early as the close of the Theban empire, as a kind of

museum, in which every century and every period of art, from the XIIth

dynasty downwards, had left its distinctive mark.*

* A on the plan denotes the XIIth dynasty temple; B is the

great hypostyle hall of Seti I. and Ramses II.; C the temple

of Ramses III.

[Illustration: 081.jpg THE TEMPLE OF AMON AT KARNAK]

All the resources of architecture had been brought into requisition

during this period to vary, at the will of each sovereign, the

arrangement and the general effect of the component parts. Columns with

sixteen sides stand in the vicinity of square pillars, and lotiform

capitals alternate with those of the bell-shape; attempts were even made

to introduce new types altogether. The architect who built at the back

of the sanctuary what is now known as the colonnade of Thûtmosis

III., attempted to invert the bell-shaped capital; the bell was turned

downwards, and the neck attached to the plinth, while the mouth rested

on the top of the shaft. This awkward arrangement did not meet with

favour, for we find it nowhere repeated; other artists, however, with

better taste, sought at this time to apply the flowers symbolical of

Upper and Lower Egypt to the decorations of the shafts. In front of the

sanctuary of Karnak two pillars are still standing which have on them

in relief representations respectively of the fullblown lotus and the

papyrus. A building composed of so many incongruous elements required

frequent restoration--a wall which had been undermined by water needed

strengthening, a pylon displaying cracks claimed attention, some

unsafe colonnade, or a colossus which had been injured by the fall of

a cornice, required shoring up--so that no sooner had the corvée for

repairs completed their work in one part, than they had to begin again

elsewhere.

[Illustration: 082.jpg THE TWO STELE-PILLARS AT KARNAK]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

The revenues of Amon must, indeed, have been enormous to have borne the

continual drain occasioned by restoration, and the resources of the god

would soon have been exhausted had not foreign wars continued to furnish

him during several centuries with all or more than he needed.

The gods had suffered severely in the troublous times which had followed

the reign of Seti II., and it required all the generosity of Ramses III.

to compensate them for the losses they had sustained during the anarchy

under Arisû. The spoil taken from the Libyans, from the Peoples of the

Sea, and from the Hittites had flowed into the sacred treasuries, while

the able administration of the sovereign had done the rest, so that on

the accession of Ramses IV. the temples were in a more prosperous state

than ever.* They held as their own property 169 towns, nine of which

were in Syria and Ethiopia; they possessed 113,433 slaves of both sexes,

493,386 head of cattle, 1,071,780 arurse of land, 514 vineyards and

orchards, 88 barks and sea-going vessels, 336 kilograms of gold both in

ingots and wrought, 2,993,964 grammes of silver, besides quantities of

copper and precious stones, and hundreds of storehouses in which they

kept corn, oil, wine, honey, and preserved meats--the produce of their

domains. Two examples will suffice to show the extent of this latter

item: the live geese reached the number of 680,714, and the salt or

smoked fish that of 494,800.** Amon claimed the giant share of this

enormous total, and three-fourths of it or more were reserved for his

use, namely---86,486 slaves, 421,362 head of cattle, 898,168 _arurse_

of cornland, 433 vineyards and orchards, and 56 Egyptian towns. The nine

foreign towns all belonged to him, and one of them contained the temple

in which he was worshipped by the Syrians whenever they came to pay

their tribute to the king’s representatives: it was but just that his

patrimony should surpass that of his compeers, since the conquering

Pharaohs owed their success to him, who, without the co-operation of the

other feudal deities, had lavished victories upon them.

* The donations of Ramses III., or rather the total of the

donations made to the gods by the predecessors of that

Pharaoh, and confirmed and augmented by him, are enumerated

at length in the _Great Harris Papyrus_.

** An abridgement of these donations occupies seven large

plates in the _Great Harris Papyrus_.

His domain was at least five times more considerable than that of Râ of

Heliopolis, and ten times greater than that of the Memphite Phtah, and

yet of old, in the earlier times of history, Râ and Phtah were reckoned

the wealthiest of the Egyptian gods. It is easy to understand the

influence which a god thus endowed with the goods of this world

exercised over men in an age when the national wars had the same

consequences for the immortals as for their worshippers, and when the

defeat of a people was regarded as a proof of the inferiority of

its patron gods. The most victorious divinity became necessarily the

wealthiest, before whom all other deities bowed, and whom they, as well

as their subjects, were obliged to serve.

So powerful a god as Amon had but few obstacles to surmount before

becoming the national deity; indeed, he was practically the foremost of

the gods during the Ramesside period, and was generally acknowledged

as Egypt’s representative by all foreign nations.* His priests shared in

the prestige he enjoyed, and their influence in state affairs increased

proportionately with his power.

* From the XVIIIth dynasty, at least, the first prophet of

Amon had taken the precedence of the high priests of

Heliopolis and Memphis, as is proved by the position he

occupies in the Egyptian hierarchy in the _Hood Papyrus_.

The chief of their hierarchy, however, did not bear the high titles

which in ancient times distinguished those of Memphis and Heliopolis; he

was content with the humble appellation of first prophet of Amon. He

had for several generations been nominated by the sovereign, but he was

generally chosen from the families attached hereditarily or otherwise

to the temple of Karnak, and must previously have passed through every

grade of the priestly hierarchy. Those who aspired to this honour had to

graduate as “divine fathers;” this was the first step in the initiation,

and one at which many were content to remain, but the more ambitious or

favoured advanced by successive stages to the dignity of third, and then

of second, prophet before attaining to the highest rank.*

* What we know on this subject has been brought to light

mainly by the inscriptions on the statue of Baûkûni-Khonsû

at Munich, published and commented on by Dévéria, and by

Lauth. The cursus honorum of Ramâ shows us that he was first

third, then second prophet of Amon, before being raised to

the pontificate in the reign of Mînephtah.

The Pharaohs of the XIXth dynasty jealously supervised the promotions

made in the Theban temples, and saw that none was elected except him who

was devoted to their interests--such as, for example, Baûkûni-khonsû

and Unnofri under Ramses II. Baûkûni-khonsû distinguished himself by his

administrative qualities; if he did not actually make the plans for the

hypostyle hall at Karnak, he appears at least to have superintended

its execution and decoration. He finished the great pylon, erected the

obelisks and gateways, built the _bari_ or vessel of the god, and found

a further field for his activity on the opposite bank of the Nile, where

he helped to complete both the chapel at Qurneh and also the Ramesseum.

Ramses II. had always been able to make his authority felt by the high

priests who succeeded Baûkûni-khonsû, but the Pharaohs who followed him

did not hold the reins with such a strong hand. As early as the reigns

of Mînephtah and Seti II. the first prophets, Raî and Ramâ, claimed the

right of building at Karnak for their own purposes, and inscribed on the

walls long inscriptions in which their own panegyrics took precedence

of that of the sovereign; they even aspired to a religious hegemony, and

declared themselves to be the “chief of all the prophets of the gods

of the South and North.” We do not know what became of them during the

usurpation of Arisû, but Nakhtû-ramses, son of Miribastît, who filled

the office during the reign of Ramses III., revived these ambitious

projects as soon as the state of Egypt appeared to favour them. The

king, however pious he might be, was not inclined to yield up any of his

authority, even though it were to the earthly delegate of the divinity

whom he reverenced before all others; the sons of the Pharaoh were,

however, more accommodating, and Nakhtû-ramses played his part so well

that he succeeded in obtaining from them the reversion of the high

priesthood for his son Amenôthes. The priestly office, from having been

elective, was by this stroke suddenly made hereditary in the family.

The kings preserved, it is true, the privilege of confirming the new

appointment, and the nominee was not considered properly qualified until

he had received his investiture from the sovereign.*

* This is proved by the Maunier stele, now in the Louvre; it

is there related how the high priest Manakh-pirrî received

his investiture from the Tanite king.

Practically the Pharaohs lost the power of choosing one among the sons

of the deceased pontiff; they were forced to enthrone the eldest of his

survivors, and legalise his accession by their approbation, even when

they would have preferred another. It was thus that a dynasty of vassal

High Priests came to be established at Thebes side by side with the

royal dynasty of the Pharaohs.

The new priestly dynasty was not long in making its power felt in

Thebes. Nakhtû-ramses and Amenôthes lived to a great age--from the reign

of Ramses III. to that of Ramses X., at the least; they witnessed the

accession of nine successive Pharaohs, and the unusual length of their

pontificates no doubt increased the already extraordinary prestige which

they enjoyed throughout the length and breadth of Egypt. It seemed as if

the god delighted to prolong the lives of his representatives beyond the

ordinary limits, while shortening those of the temporal sovereigns. When

the reigns of the Pharaohs began once more to reach their normal length,

the authority of Amenôthes had become so firmly established that no

human power could withstand it, and the later Ramessides were merely a

set of puppet kings who were ruled by him and his successors. Not only

was there a cessation of foreign expeditions, but the Delta, Memphis,

and Ethiopia were alike neglected, and the only activity displayed

by these Pharaohs, as far as we can gather from their monuments, was

confined to the service of Amon and Khonsû at Thebes. The lack of energy

and independence in these sovereigns may not, however, be altogether

attributable to their feebleness of character; it is possible that they

would gladly have entered on a career of conquest had they possessed

the means. It is always a perilous matter to allow the resources of

a country to fall into the hands of a priesthood, and to place its

military forces at the same time in the hands of the chief religious

authority. The warrior Pharaohs had always had at their disposal the

spoils obtained from foreign nations to make up the deficit which their

constant gifts to the temples were making in the treasury. The sons

of Ramses III., on the other hand, had suspended all military efforts,

without, however, lessening their lavish gifts to the gods, and they

must, in the absence of the spoils of war, have drawn to a considerable

extent upon the ordinary resources of the country; their successors

therefore found the treasury impoverished, and they would have been

entirely at a loss for money had they attempted to renew the campaigns

or continue the architectural work of their forefathers. The priests of

Amon had not as yet suffered materially from this diminution of revenue,

for they possessed property throughout the length and breadth of Egypt,

but they were obliged to restrict their expenditure, and employ the sums

formerly used for the enlarging of the temples on the maintenance

of their own body. Meanwhile public works had been almost everywhere

suspended; administrative discipline became relaxed, and disturbances,

with which the police were unable to cope, were increasing in all the

important towns. Nothing is more indicative of the state to which Egypt

was reduced, under the combined influence of the priesthood and the

Ramessides, than the thefts and pillaging of which the Theban necropolis

was then the daily scene. The robbers no longer confined themselves

to plundering the tombs of private persons; they attacked the royal

burying-places, and their depredations were carried on for years before

they were discovered. In the reign of Ramses IX., an inquiry, set on

foot by Amenôthes, revealed the fact that the tomb of Sovkûmsaûf I. and

his wife, Queen Nûbk-hâs, had been rifled, that those of Amenôthes I.

and of Antuf IV. had been entered by tunnelling, and that some dozen

other royal tombs in the cemetery of Drah abu’l Neggah were threatened.*

* The principal part of this inquiry constitutes the _Abbott

Papyrus_, acquired and published by the British Museum,

first examined and made the subject of study by Birch,

translated simultaneously into French by Maspero and by

Chabas, into German by Lauth and by Erman. Other papyri

relate to the same or similar occurrences, such as the Salt

and Amherst Papyri published by Chabas, and also the

Liverpool Papyri, of which we possess merely scattered

notices in the writings of Goodwin, and particularly in

those of Spiegelberg.

The severe means taken to suppress the evil were not, however,

successful; the pillagings soon began afresh, and the reigns of the last

three Ramessides between the robbers and the authorities, were marked by

a struggle in which the latter did not always come off triumphant.

[Illustration: 089.jpg RAMSES IX.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Lepsius.

A system of repeated inspections secured the valley of Biban el-Moluk

from marauders,* but elsewhere the measures of defence employed were

unavailing, and the necropolis was given over to pillage, although both

Amenôthes and Hrihor had used every effort to protect it.

* Graffiti which are evidences of these inspections have

been drawn on the walls of several royal tombs by the

inspectors. Others have been found on several of the coffins

discovered at Deîr el-Baharî, e.g. on those of Seti I. and

Ramses II.; the most ancient belong to the pontificate of

Hrihor, others belong to the XXIst dynasty.

Hrihor appears to have succeeded immediately after Amenôthes, and

his accession to the pontificate gave his family a still more exalted

position in the country. As his wife Nozmit was of royal blood, he

assumed titles and functions to which his father and grandfather

had made no claim. He became the “Royal Son” of Ethiopia and

commander-in-chief of the national and foreign troops; he engraved his

name upon the monuments he decorated, side by side with that of Ramses

XII.; in short, he possessed all the characteristics of a Pharaoh except

the crown and the royal protocol. A century scarcely had elapsed since

the abdication of Ramses III., and now Thebes and the whole of Egypt

owned two masters: one the embodiment of the ancient line, but a mere

nominal king; the other the representative of Amon, and the actual ruler

of the country.

What then happened when the last Ramses who bore the kingly title was

gathered to his fathers? The royal lists record the accession after his

death of a new dynasty of Tanitic origin, whose founder was Nsbindidi

or Smendes; but, on the other hand, we gather from the Theban monuments

that the crown was seized by Hrihor, who reigned over the southern

provinces contemporaneously with Smendes. Hrihor boldly assumed as

prenomen his title of “First Prophet of Amon,” and his authority was

acknowledged by Ethiopia, over which he was viceroy, as well as by the

nomes forming the temporal domain of the high priests. The latter had

acquired gradually, either by marriage or inheritance, fresh territory

for the god, in the lands of the princes of Nekhabît, Kop-tos, Akhmîm,

and Abydos, besides the domains of some half-dozen feudal houses

who, from force of circumstances, had become sacerdotal families; the

extinction of the direct line of Ramessides now secured the High

Priests the possession of Thebes itself, and of all the lands within the

southern provinces which were the appanage of the crown.

[Illustration: 091.jpg HRIHOR]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Champollion.

They thus, in one way or another, became the exclusive masters of the

southern half of the Nile valley, from Elephantine to Siut; beyond Siut

also they had managed to acquire suzerainty over the town of Khobît, and

the territory belonging to it formed an isolated border province in the

midst of the independent baronies.*

* The extent of the principality of Thebes under the high

priests has been determined by means of the sacerdotal

titles of the Theban princesses.

The representative of the dynasty reigning at Tanis held the remainder

of Egypt from Shit to the Mediterranean--the half belonging to the

Memphite Phtah and the Helio-politan Râ, as opposed to that assigned to

Anion. The origin of this Tanite sovereign is uncertain, but it would

appear that he was of more exalted rank than his rival in the south. The

official chronicling of events was marked by the years of his reign, and

the chief acts of the government were carried out in his name even in

the Thebaid.* Repeated inundations had caused the ruin of part of the

temple of Karnak, and it was by the order and under the auspices of this

prince that all the resources of the country were employed to accomplish

the much-needed restoration.**

* I have pointed out that the years of the reign mentioned

in the inscriptions of the high priests and the kings of the

sacerdotal line must be attributed to their suzerains, the

kings of Tanis. Hrihor alone seems to have been an

exception, since to him are attributed the dates inscribed

in the name of the King Siamon: M. Daressy, however, will

not admit this, and asserts that this Siamon was a Tanite

sovereign who must not be identified with Hrihor, and must

be placed at least two or three generations later than the

last of the Ramessides.

* The real name Nsbindidi and the first monument of the

Manethonian Smendes were discovered in the quarries of

Dababîeh, opposite Gebelên.

It would have been impossible for him to have exercised any authority

over so rich and powerful a personage as Hrihor had he not possessed

rights to the crown, before which even the high priests of Amon were

obliged to bow, and hence it has been supposed that he was a descendant

of Ramses II. The descendants of this sovereign were doubtless divided

into at least two branches, one of which had just become extinct,

leaving no nearer heir than Hrihor, while another, of which there were

many ramifications, had settled in the Delta. The majority of these

descendants had become mingled with the general population, and had sunk

to the condition of private individuals; they had, however, carefully

preserved the tradition of their origin, and added proudly to their name

the qualification of royal son of Ramses. They were degenerate scions

of the Ramessides, and had neither the features nor the energy of their

ancestor. One of them, Zodphta-haûfônkhi, whose mummy was found at Deîr

el-Baharî, appears to have been tall and vigorous, but the head lacks

the haughty refinement which characterizes those of Seti I. and Ramses

II., and the features are heavy and coarse, having a vulgar, commonplace

expression.

[Illustration: 093.jpg ZODPHTAHAUFONKHI, ROYAL SON OF RAMSES]

Drawn by Boudier, from the photograph by Insinger.

It seems probable that one branch of the family, endowed with greater

capability than the rest, was settled at Tanis, where Sesostris had,

as we have seen, resided for many years; Smendes was the first of this

branch to ascend the throne. The remembrance of his remote ancestor,

Ramses IL, which was still treasured up in the city he had completely

rebuilt, as well as in the Delta into which he had infused new life, was

doubtless of no small service in securing the crown for his descendant,

when, the line of the Theban kings having come to an end, the Tanites

put in their claim to the succession. We are unable to discover if

war broke out between the two competitors, or if they arrived at an

agreement without a struggle; but, at all events, we may assume that,

having divided Egypt between them, neither of them felt himself strong

enough to overcome his rival, and contented himself with the possession

of half the empire, since he could not possess it in its entirety. We

may fairly believe that Smendes had the greater right to the throne,

and, above all, the more efficient army of the two, since, had it been

otherwise, Hrihor would never have consented to yield him the priority.

The unity of Egypt was, to outward appearances, preserved, through the

nominal possession by Smendes of the suzerainty; but, as a matter of

fact, it had ceased to exist, and the fiction of the two kingdoms

had become a reality for the first time within the range of history.

Henceforward there were two Egypts, governed by different constitutions

and from widely remote centres. Theban Egypt was, before all things,

a community recognizing a theocratic government, in which the kingly

office was merged in that of the high priest. Separated from Asia by the

length of the Delta, it turned its attention, like the Pharaohs of the

VIth and XIIth dynasties, to Ethiopia, and owing to its distance from

the Mediterranean, and from the new civilization developed on its

shores, it became more and more isolated, till at length it was reduced

to a purely African state. Northern Egypt, on the contrary, maintained

contact with European and Asiatic nations; it took an interest in their

future, it borrowed from them to a certain extent whatever struck it as

being useful or beautiful, and when the occasion presented itself, it

acted in concert with Mediterranean powers. There was an almost constant

struggle between these two divisions of the empire, at times

breaking out into an open rupture, to end as often in a temporary

re-establishment of unity. At one time Ethiopia would succeed in

annexing Egypt, and again Egypt would seize some part of Ethiopia; but

the settlement of affairs was never final, and the conflicting elements,

brought with difficulty into harmony, relapsed into their usual

condition at the end of a few years. A kingdom thus divided against

itself could never succeed in maintaining its authority over those

provinces which, even in the heyday of its power, had proved impatient

of its yoke.

Asia was associated henceforward in the minds of the Egyptians with

painful memories of thwarted ambitions, rather than as offering a field

for present conquest. They were pursued by the memories of their former

triumphs, and the very monuments of their cities recalled what they

were anxious to forget. Wherever they looked within their towns they

encountered the representation of some Asiatic scene; they read the

names of the cities of Syria on the walls of their temples; they saw

depicted on them its princes and its armies, whose defeat was recorded

by the inscriptions as well as the tribute which they had been forced

to pay. The sense of their own weakness prevented the Egyptians from

passing from useless regrets to action; when, however, one or other of

the Pharaohs felt sufficiently secure on the throne to carry his troops

far afield, he was always attracted to Syria, and crossed her frontiers,

often, alas! merely to encounter defeat.

[Illustration: 095.jpg Tailpiece]

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 6 (of 12) · 第 2 / 9 章