INSET--THE LARK (ANOTHER CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR).]

_Wednesday, May 10th._--Among the Distinguished Strangers in the Gallery

was a deputation from the Russian Duma, led by its Vice-President.

Unfortunately M. PROTOPOPOFF and his colleagues did not see our

Parliament at its best. In the Commons the Nationalist factions were

noisily assailing the PRIME MINISTER with protests against the

executions of the rebel leaders, and ultimately succeeded in inducing

him to give them a day for what must in the circumstances be a premature

discussion.

Then our Russian friends went to the Lords, where they found a

discussion on Ireland actually in progress. It was started by Lord

LOREBURN, who accused the Government of having neglected the elementary

duty of protecting the law-abiding population, and urged upon them

collectively the necessity of being as candid as Mr. BIRRELL had been

individually. The War had furnished many instances of the danger to

national interests of silence carried to excess. Then Lord MIDLETON

rehearsed a grim catalogue of cases in which the Irish police had been

instructed to shut their eyes to seditious offences.

Happily the Russian visitors had left before Lord CREWE rose to make the

Government's defence, for I am afraid that they would not have carried

away a high impression of Ministerial eloquence or Ministerial

statesmanship.

_Thursday, May 11th._--To Mr. REDMOND'S obvious annoyance Mr. DILLON

developed a savage attack on the military authorities. They, one

gathered, were brutal murderers; the Sinn Feiners, on the contrary, were

gallant if misguided patriots of whom he was proud. The PRIME MINISTER,

mildly observing that Mr. DILLON had forgotten some of the elementary

rules of justice, brought the debate back to the level of common sense

by contrasting the small number of executions with the heavy toll of

military and civilian life that the rebels had taken. Repeating his

_coup_ of two years ago, when he went to the War Office after the

Curragh incident, he now announced his immediate intention to go to

Ireland, in the hope of discovering some arrangement for the future

which would commend itself to all parties. Some of the difficulties that

Mr. ASQUITH will encounter in his laudable enterprise were indicated by

Mr. HEALY, who hoped that he would put an end to Dublin Castle and the

jobbery that had been carried on there by Mr. REDMOND and his friends.

In the Lords the Government's Irish policy was again assailed from all

sides; but more damaging even than the attacks was Lord LANSDOWNE'S

defence. He actually blamed Lord MIDLETON for having contented himself

with warning the CHIEF SECRETARY and the PRIME MINISTER of the dangerous

happenings in Ireland, and not having come to him (Lord LANSDOWNE), or

to Mr. BALFOUR, or to Mr. LONG. This new doctrine of collective

irresponsibility seems fairly to justify the definition, "A Coalition is

something that does not coalesce."

* * * * *

"Imports in truth have been so small that the run on home produce

has been more or less forced."--_Eastern Daily Press._

The Press Bureau will have to be more economical with it than ever.

* * * * *

"Wellington said that the battle of Waterloo was won upon the

cricket fields of England. Later--decades later--the bronzed and

lithe-limbed athletes of the island kingdom gazed in open-eyed

bewilderment upon the flaming indictment of Kipling, 'The muddled

oafs at the wicket; the flannelled fools at the gate,' and seeking

vainly to follow the poet's logic."

_New York Times._

Presented in this form it would baffle anybody.

* * * * *

[Illustration: BREAKFAST IN A FRONT TRENCH.

_Tommy._ "THE BLOOMIN' DUG-OUT'S FLOODED OUT, THE BISCUIT'S WET, THE

TEA'S COLD AND THERE AIN'T NOTHIN' TO WARM IT WITH."

_Sergeant._ "OH, CHUCK IT! I DUNNO WHAT SOME OF YOU BLIGHTERS WOULD DO

IF YOU 'AD TO ROUGH IT!"]

* * * * *

Punch or the London Charivari, Volume 150, May 17 1916 · 第 23 / 47 题