CHAPTER I

The University of Minnesota

STUDIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES NUMBER 9

AGRICULTURE OF THE HIDATSA INDIANS

AN INDIAN INTERPRETATION

BY

GILBERT LIVINGSTONE WILSON, Ph.D.

[Illustration: THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA]

MINNEAPOLIS

Bulletin of the University of Minnesota

November 1917

PRICE: 75 CENTS

RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

These publications contain the results of research work from various

departments of the University and are offered for exchange with

universities, scientific societies, and other institutions. Papers will

be published as separate monographs numbered in several series. There

is no stated interval of publication. Application for any of these

publications should be made to the University Librarian.

STUDIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

1. THOMPSON AND WARBER, Social and Economic Survey of a Rural Township in

Southern Minnesota. 1913. $0.50.

2. MATTHIAS NORDBERG ORFIELD, Federal Land Grants to the States, with

Special Reference to Minnesota. 1915. $1.00.

3. EDWARD VAN DYKE ROBINSON, Early Economic Conditions and the

Development of Agriculture in Minnesota. 1915. $1.50.

4. L. D. H. WELD AND OTHERS, Studies in the Marketing of Farm Products.

1915. $0.50.

5. BEN PALMER, Swamp Land Drainage, with Special Reference to Minnesota.

1915. $0.50.

6. ALBERT ERNEST JENKS, Indian-White Amalgamation: An Anthropometric

Study. 1916. $0.50.

7. C. D. ALLIN, A History of the Tariff Relations of the Australian

Colonies. In press.

8. FRANCES H. RELF, The Petition of Right. In press.

9. GILBERT L. WILSON, Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians: An Indian

Interpretation. 1917. $0.75.

10. NOTESTEIN AND RELF, _Editors_, Commons Debates for 1629. In press.

11. RAYMOND A. KENT, State Aid to Public Schools. In press.

STUDIES IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS

1. FRANKFORTER AND FRARY, Equilibria in Systems Containing Alcohols,

Salts, and Water. 1912. $0.50.

2. FRANKFORTER AND KRITCHEVSKY, A New Phase of Catalysis. 1914. $0.50.

STUDIES IN ENGINEERING

1. GEORGE ALFRED MANEY, Secondary Stresses and Other Problems in Rigid

Frames: A New Method of Solution. 1915. $0.25.

2. CHARLES FRANKLIN SHOOP, An Investigation of the Concrete Road-Making

Properties of Minnesota Stone and Gravel. 1915. $0.25.

3. FRANKLIN R. MCMILLAN, Shrinkage and Time Effects in Reinforced

Concrete. 1915. $0.25.

(Continued inside back cover)

[Illustration: Maxi´diwiac, or Buffalobird-woman

Photographed in 1910]

The University of Minnesota

STUDIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES NUMBER 9

AGRICULTURE OF THE HIDATSA INDIANS

AN INDIAN INTERPRETATION

BY

GILBERT LIVINGSTONE WILSON, Ph.D.

[Illustration: THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA]

MINNEAPOLIS

Bulletin of the University of Minnesota

November 1917

COPYRIGHT 1917

BY THE

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

PREFACE

The field of primitive economic activity has been largely left

uncultivated by both economists and anthropologists. The present study

by Mr. Gilbert L. Wilson is an attempt to add to the scanty knowledge

already at hand on the subject of the economic life of the American

Indian.

The work was begun without theory or thesis, but solely with the object

of gathering available data from an old woman expert agriculturist in

one of the oldest agricultural tribes accessible to a student of the

University of Minnesota. That the study has unexpectedly revealed certain

varieties of maize of apparently great value to agriculture in the

semi-arid areas west of Minnesota is a cause of satisfaction to both Mr.

Wilson and myself. This fact again emphasizes the wisdom of research work

in our universities. When, now and then, such practical dollar-and-cent

results follow such purely scientific researches, the wonder is that

university research work is not generously endowed by businesses which

largely profit by these researches.

It is the intention of those interested in the anthropological work of

the University of Minnesota that occasional publications will be issued

by the University on anthropological subjects, although at present

there is no justification for issuing a consecutive series. The present

study is the second one in the anthropological field published by the

University. The earlier one is number 6 in the _Studies in the Social

Sciences_, issued March, 1916.

ALBERT ERNEST JENKS

_Professor of Anthropology_

CONTENTS

PAGES

Foreword 1-5

Chapter I—Tradition 6-8

Chapter II—Beginning a garden 9-15

Turtle 9

Clearing fields 9

Dispute and its settlement 10

Turtle breaking soil 11

Turtle’s primitive tools 12

Beginning a field in later times 13

Trees in the garden 15

Our west field 15

Burning over the field 15

Chapter III—Sunflowers 16-21

Remark by Maxi´diwiac 16

Planting sunflowers 16

Varieties 16

Harvesting the seed 17

Threshing 18

Harvesting the mapi´-na´ka 18

Effect of frost 18

Parching the seed 19

Four-vegetables-mixed 19

Sunflower-seed balls 21

Chapter IV—Corn 22-67

Planting 22

A morning’s planting 23

Soaking the seed 23

Planting for a sick woman 24

Size of our biggest field 24

Na´xu and nu´cami 25

Hoeing 26

The watchers’ stage 26

Explanation of sketch of watchers’ stage 28

Sweet Grass’s sun shade 30

The watchers 30

Booths 31

Eating customs 32

Youths’ and maidens’ customs 33

Watchers’ songs 33

Clan cousins’ custom 34

Story of Snake-head-ornament 35

Green corn and its uses 36-41

The ripening ears 36

Second planting for green corn 37

Cooking fresh green corn 37

Roasting ears 37

Mätu´a-la´kapa 38

Corn bread 38

Drying green corn for winter 39

Mapë´di (corn smut) 42

Mapë´di 42

Harvest and uses 42

The ripe corn harvest 42-47

Husking 42

Rejecting green ears 44

Braiding corn 45

The smaller ears 46

Drying the braided ears 47

Seed corn 47-49

Selecting the seed 47

Keeping two years’ seed 48

Threshing corn 49-58

The booth 49

Order of the day’s work 52

The cobs 53

Winnowing 54

Removing the booth 55

Threshing braided corn 57

Amount of harvest 57

Sioux purchasing corn 58

Varieties of corn 58-60

Description of varieties 58

How corn travels 59

Uses of the varieties 60-67

Atạ´ki tso´ki 60

Mäpi´ nakapa´ 60

Mä´nakapa 61

Atạ´ki 62

Boiled corn ball 62

Tsï´di tso´ki and tsï´di tapa´ 62

Mạdạpo´zi i’ti´a 63

Other soft varieties 63

Ma´ikadicakĕ 63

Mä´pĭ mĕĕ´pĭi’´kiuta, or corn balls 63

Parched soft corn 64

Parching whole ripe ears 64

Parching hard yellow corn with sand 64

Mạdạpo´zi pạ´kici, or lye-made hominy 64

General characteristics of the varieties 65

Fodder yield 66

Developing new varieties 66

Sport ears 67

Names and description 67

Na’´ta-tawo´xi 67

Wi´da-aka´ta 67

I´ta-ca´ca 67

Okĕi´jpita 67

I´tica´kupadi 67

Chapter V—Squashes 68-81

Planting squashes 68

Sprouting the seed 68

Planting the sprouted seed 69

Harvesting the squashes 69

Slicing the squashes 70

Squash spits 71

Spitting the slices 72

In case of rain 73

Drying and storing 73

Squash blossoms 75

Cooking and uses of squash 76

The first squashes 76

Boiling fresh squash in a pot 76

Squashes boiled with blossoms 77

Other blossom messes 77

Boiled blossoms 77

Blossoms boiled with mạdạpo´zi i’ti´a 77

Blossoms boiled with mäpi´ nakapa´ 78

Seed squashes 78-81

Selecting for seed 78

Gathering the seed squashes 78

Cooking the ripe squashes 79

Saving the seed 79

Eating the seeds 80

Roasting ripe squashes 80

Storing the unused seed squashes 80

Squashes, present seed 81

Squash dolls 81

Chapter VI—Beans 82-86

Planting beans 82

Putting in the seeds 82

Hoeing and cultivating 83

Threshing 83

Varieties 84

Selecting seed beans 85

Cooking and uses 85

Ama´ca di´hĕ, or beans-boiled 86

Green beans boiled in the pod 86

Green corn and beans 86

Chapter VII—Storing for winter 87-97

The cache pit 87

Grass for lining 88

Grass bundles 89

The grass binding rope 89

Drying the grass bundles 89

The willow floor 89

The grass lining 90

Skin bottom covering 90

Storing the cache pit 90

The puncheon cover 93

Cache pits in Small Ankle’s lodge 95

First account 95

A second account on another day 96

Diagram of Small Ankle’s lodge 97

Chapter VIII—The making of a drying stage 98-104

Stages in Like-a-fishhook village 98

Cutting the timbers 98

Digging the post holes 99

Raising the frame 100

The floor 100

Staying thongs 101

Ladder 101

Enlarging the stage 102

Present stages 102

Building, women’s work 102

Measurements of stage 103

Drying rods 104

Other uses of the drying stage 104

Chapter IX—Tools 105-106

Hoe 105

Rakes 105

Squash knives 106

Chapter X—Fields at Like-a-fishhook village 108-112

East-side fields 108

East-side fences 108

Idikita´c’s garden 110

Fields west of the village 110

West-side fence 111

Crops, our first wagon 112

Chapter XI—Miscellanea 113-118

Divisions between gardens 113

Fallowing, ownership of gardens 113

Frost in the gardens 115

Maxi´diwiac’s philosophy of frost 115

Men helping in the field 115

Sucking the sweet juice 116

Corn as fodder for horses 116

Disposition of weeds 116

The spring clean-up 116

Manure 117

Worms 117

Wild animals 117

About old tent covers 118

Chapter XII—Since white men came 119-120

How we got potatoes and other vegetables 119

The new cultivation 120

Iron kettles 120

Chapter XIII—Tobacco 121-127

Observations by Maxi´diwiac 121

The tobacco garden 121

Planting 122

Arrow-head-earring’s tobacco garden 122

Small Ankle’s cultivation 122

Harvesting the blossoms 123

Harvesting the plants 124

Selling to the Sioux 125

Size of tobacco garden 126

Customs 126

Accessories to the tobacco garden 126-127

Fence 126

The scrotum basket 127

Old garden sites near Independence 129

HIDATSA ALPHABET

a as a in what

e ” ai ” air

i ” i ” pique

o ” o ” tone

u ” u ” rule

ä ” a ” father

ë ” ey ” they

ï ” i ” machine

ạ ” u ” hut

ĕ ” e ” met

ĭ ” i ” tin

c ” sh ” shun

x ” ch ” machen (German)

j ” ch ” mich (German)

z ” z ” azure

b, d, h, k, l, m, n, p, r, s, t, w, as in English

b, w, interchangeable with m

n, l, r, interchangeable with d

An apostrophe (’) marks a short, nearly inaudible breathing.

Native Hidatsa words in this thesis are written in the foregoing

alphabet. This does not apply to the tribal names Hidatsa, Mandan,

Dakota, Arikara, Minitari.

AGRICULTURE OF THE HIDATSA INDIANS AN INDIAN INTERPRETATION

FOREWORD

The Hidatsas, called Minitaris by the Mandans, are a Siouan linguistic

tribe. Their language is closely akin to that of the Crows with whom

they claim to have once formed a single tribe; a separation, it is said,

followed a quarrel over a slain buffalo.

The name Hidatsa was formerly borne by one of the tribal villages. The

other villages consolidated with it, and the name was adopted as that

of the tribe. The name is said to mean “willows,” and it was given the

village because the god Itsikama´hidic promised that the villagers should

become as numerous as the willows of the Missouri river.

Tradition says that the tribe came from Miniwakan, or Devils Lake, in

what is now North Dakota; and that migrating west, they met the Mandans

at the mouth of the Heart River. The two tribes formed an alliance and

attempted to live together as one people. Quarrels between their young

men caused the tribes to separate, but the Mandans loyally aided their

friends to build new villages a few miles from their own. How long the

two tribes dwelt at the mouth of the Heart is not known. They were found

there with the Arikaras about 1765. In 1804 Lewis and Clark found the

Hidatsas in three villages at the mouth of the Knife River, and the

Mandans in two villages a few miles lower down on the Missouri.

In 1832 the artist Catlin visited the two tribes, remaining with them

several months. A year later Maximilian of Wied visited them with the

artist Bodmer. Copies of Bodmer’s sketches, in beautiful lithograph,

are found in the library of the Minnesota Historical Society. Catlin’s

sketches, also in lithograph, are in the Minneapolis Public Library.

Smallpox nearly exterminated the Mandans in 1837-8, not more than 150

persons surviving. The same epidemic reduced the Hidatsas to about 500

persons. The remnants of the two tribes united and in 1845 removed up

the Missouri and built a village at Like-a-fishhook bend close to the

trading post of Fort Berthold. They were joined by the Arikaras in 1862.

Neighboring lands were set apart as a reservation for them; and there the

three tribes, now settled on allotments, still dwell.

The Mandans and Hidatsas have much intermarried. By custom children

speak usually the language of their mother, but understand perfectly the

dialect of either tribe.

In 1877 Washington Matthews, for several years government physician to

the Fort Berthold Reservation Indians, published a short description

of Hidatsa-Mandan culture and a grammar and vocabulary of the Hidatsa

language.[1] More extensive notes intended by him for publication were

destroyed by fire.

In 1902 the writer was called to the pastorate of the Presbyterian church

of Mandan, North Dakota. In ill health, he was advised by his physician

to purchase pony and gun and seek the open; but spade and pick plied

among the old Indian sites in the vicinity proved more interesting. A

considerable collection of archaeological objects was accumulated, a part

of which now rests in the shelves of the Minnesota Historical Society;

the rest will shortly be placed in the collections of the American Museum

of Natural History.

In 1906 the writer and his brother, Frederick N. Wilson, an artist,

and E. R. Steinbrueck drove by wagon from Mandan to Independence,

Fort Berthold reservation. The trip was made to obtain sketches for

illustrating a volume of stories, since published.[2] At Independence the

party made the acquaintance of Edward Goodbird, his mother Maxi´diwiac,

and the latter’s brother Wolf Chief. A friendship was thus begun which

has been of the greatest value to the writer of this paper.

A year later Mr. George G. Heye sent the writer to Fort Berthold

reservation to collect objects of Mandan-Hidatsa culture. Among those

that were obtained was a rare old medicine shrine. Description of this

shrine and Wolf Chief’s story of its origin have been published.[3]

In 1908 the writer and his brother, both now resident in Minneapolis,

were sent by Dr. Clark Wissler, curator of anthropology, American Museum

of Natural History, to begin cultural studies among the Hidatsas. This

work, generously supported by the Museum, has been continued by the

writer each succeeding summer. His reports, preparations to edit which

are now being made, will appear in the Museum’s publications.

In February, 1910, the writer was admitted as a student in the Graduate

School, University of Minnesota, majoring in Anthropology. At suggestion

of his adviser, Dr. Albert E. Jenks, and with permission of Dr. Wissler,

he chose for his thesis subject, _Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians:

An Indian Interpretation_. It was the adviser’s opinion that such a

study held promise of more than usual interest. Most of the tribes in

the eastern area of what is now the United States practiced agriculture.

It is well known that maize, potatoes, pumpkins, squashes, beans, sweet

potatoes, cotton, tobacco, and other familiar plants were cultivated

by Indians centuries before Columbus. Early white settlers learned the

value of the new food plants, but have left us meager accounts of the

native methods of tillage; and the Indians, driven from the fields of

their fathers, became roving hunters; or adopting iron tools, forgot

their primitive implements and methods. The Hidatsas and Mandans, shut

in their stockaded villages on the Missouri by the hostile Sioux, were

not able to abandon their fields if they would. Living quite out of the

main lines of railroad traffic, they remained isolated and with culture

almost unchanged until about 1885, when their village at Fort Berthold

was broken up. It seemed probable that a carefully prepared account of

Hidatsa agriculture might very nearly describe the agriculture practiced

by our northern tribes in pre-Columbian days. It was hoped that this

thesis might be such an account.

But the writer is a student of anthropology; and his interest in the

preparation of his thesis could not be that of an agriculturist. The

question arose at the beginning of his labors, Shall the materials of

this thesis be presented as a study merely in primitive agriculture, or

as a phase of material culture interpreting something of the inner life,

of the soul, of an Indian? It is the latter aim that the writer endeavors

to accomplish.

But again came up a question, By what plan may this best be done?

The more usual way would be to collect exhaustively facts from

available informants; sift from them those facts that are typical and

representative; and present these, properly grouped, with the collector’s

interpretation of them. But for his purpose and aim, it has seemed to

the writer that the type choice should be human; that is, instead of

seeking typical facts from multiple sources, he should rather seek a

typical informant, a representative agriculturist—presumably a woman—of

the Indian group to be studied, and let the informant interpret her

agricultural experiences in her own way. We might thus expect to learn

how much one Indian woman knew of agriculture; what she did as an

agriculturist and what were her motives for doing; and what proportion of

her thought and labor were given to her fields.

After consulting both Indians and whites resident on the reservation, the

writer chose for typical or representative informant, his interpreter’s

mother, Maxi´diwiac.

The writer’s summer visit of 1912 to Fort Berthold Reservation was

planned to obtain material for his thesis. His brother again accompanied

him, and for the expenses of the trip a grant of $500 was made by

Curator Wissler. This trip the writer will remember as one of the

pleasantest experiences of his life. The generous interest of Dr. Jenks

and Dr. Wissler in his plans was equaled by the faithful coöperation

of interpreter and informant. The writer and his brother arrived at

the reservation in the beginning of corn harvest. As already stated,

Maxi´diwiac was the principal informant, and her account was taken down

almost literally as translated by Goodbird. Models of tools, drying

stage, and other objects pertaining to agriculture were made and

photographed, and sketched. Before the harvest closed notes were obtained

which furnished the material for the greater part of this thesis.

In the summers of 1913, 1914, and 1915, additional matter was recovered.

Previously written notes were read to Maxi´diwiac and corrections made.

In addition to the museum’s annual grant of $250, Dean A. F. Woods,

Department of Agriculture, University of Minnesota, in 1914 contributed

$60 for photographing, and collecting specimens of Hidatsa corn; and Mr.

M. L. Wilson of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Bozeman, Montana,

obtained for the writer a grant of $50 for like purposes.

A few words should now be said of informant and interpreter. Maxi´diwiac,

or Buffalobird-woman, is a daughter of Small Ankle, a leader of the

Hidatsas in the trying time of the tribe’s removal to what is now Fort

Berthold reservation. She was born on one of the villages at Knife River

two years after the “smallpox year,” or about 1839. She is a conservative

and sighs for the good old times, yet is aware that the younger

generation of Indians must adopt civilized ways. Ignorant of English, she

has a quick intelligence and a memory that is marvelous. To her patience

and loyal interest is chiefly due whatever of value is in this thesis. In

the sweltering heat of an August day she has continued dictation for nine

hours, lying down but never flagging in her account, when too weary to

sit longer in a chair. Goodbird’s testimony that his mother “knows more

about old ways of raising corn and squashes than any one else on this

reservation,” is not without probability. Until recently, a small part of

Goodbird’s plowed field was each year reserved for her, that she might

plant corn and beans and squashes, cultivating them in old fashioned

way, by hoe. Such corn, of her own planting and selection, has taken

first prize at an agricultural fair, held recently by the reservation

authorities.

Edward Goodbird, or Tsaka´kasạkic, the writer’s interpreter, is a son of

Maxi´diwiac, born about November, 1869. Goodbird was one of the first of

the reservation children to be sent to the mission school; and he is now

native pastor of the Congregational chapel at Independence. He speaks the

Hidatsa, Mandan, Dakota, and English languages. Goodbird is a natural

student; and he has the rarer gift of being an artist. His sketches—and

they are many—are crude; but they are drawn in true perspective and do

not lack spirit. Goodbird’s life, dictated by himself, has been recently

published.[4]

Indians have the gentle custom of adopting very dear friends by

relationship terms. By such adoption Goodbird is the writer’s brother;

Maxi´diwiac is his mother.

For his part in the account of the _Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians_,

the writer claims no credit beyond arranging the material and putting

the interpreter’s Indian-English translations into proper idiom. Bits

of Indian philosophy and shrewd or humorous observations found in the

narrative are not the writer’s, but the informant’s, and are as they

fell from her lips. The writer has sincerely endeavored to add to the

narrative essentially nothing of his own.

_Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians_ is not, then, an account merely of

Indian agriculture. It is an Indian woman’s interpretation of economics;

the thoughts she gave to her fields; the philosophy of her labors.

May the Indian woman’s story of her toil be a plea for our better

appreciation of her race.

CHAPTER I

TRADITION

We Hidatsas believe that our tribe once lived under the waters of Devils

Lake. Some hunters discovered the root of a vine growing downward; and

climbing it, they found themselves on the surface of the earth. Others

followed them, until half the tribe had escaped; but the vine broke under

the weight of a pregnant woman, leaving the rest prisoners. A part of our

tribe are therefore still beneath the lake.

My father, Small Ankle, going, when a young man, on a war party, visited

Devils Lake. “Beneath the waves,” he said, “I heard a faint drumming, as

of drums in a big dance.” This story is true; for Sioux, who now live at

Devils Lake, have also heard this drumming.

Those of my people who escaped from the lake built villages near by.

These were of earth lodges, such as my tribe built until very recent

years; two such earth lodges are still standing on this reservation.

The site where an earth lodge has stood is marked by an earthen ring,

rising about what was once the hard trampled floor. There are many such

earthen rings on the shores of Devils Lake, showing that, as tradition

says, our villages stood there. There were three of these villages, my

father said, who several times visited the sites.

Near their villages, the people made gardens; and in these they planted

ground beans and wild potatoes, from seed brought with them from their

home under the water. These vegetables we do not cultivate now; but we do

gather them in the fall, in the woods along the Missouri where they grow

wild. They are good eating.

These gardens by Devils Lake I think must have been rather small. I know

that in later times, whenever my tribe removed up the Missouri to build a

new village, our fields, the first year, were quite small; for clearing

the wooded bottom land was hard work. A family usually added to their

clearing each year, until their garden was as large as they cared to

cultivate.

As yet, my people knew nothing of corn or squashes. One day a war party,

I think of ten men, wandered west to the Missouri River. They saw on the

other side a village of earth lodges like their own. It was a village of

the Mandans. The villagers saw the Hidatsas, but like them, feared to

cross over, lest the strangers prove to be enemies.

It was autumn, and the Missouri River was running low so that an arrow

could be shot from shore to shore. The Mandans parched some ears of ripe

corn with the grain on the cob; they broke the ears in pieces, thrust the

pieces on the points of arrows, and shot them across the river. “Eat!”

they said, whether by voice or signs, I do not know. The word for “eat”

is the same in the Hidatsa and Mandan languages.

The warriors ate of the parched corn, and liked it. They returned to

their village and said, “We have found a people living by the Missouri

River who have a strange kind of grain, which we ate and found good!” The

tribe was not much interested and made no effort to seek the Mandans,

fearing, besides, that they might not be friendly.

However, a few years after, a war party of the Hidatsas crossed the

Missouri and visited the Mandans at their village near Bird Beak Hill.

The Mandan chief took an ear of yellow corn, broke it in two, and gave

half to the Hidatsas. This half-ear the Hidatsas took home, for seed; and

soon every family was planting yellow corn.

I think that seed of other varieties of corn, and of beans, squashes, and

sunflowers, were gotten of the Mandans[5] afterwards; but there is no

story telling of this, that I know.

I do not know when my people stopped planting ground beans and wild

potatoes; but ground beans are hard to dig, and the people, anyway, liked

the new kind of beans better.

Whether the ground beans and wild potatoes of the Missouri bottoms are

descended from the seed planted by the villagers at Devils Lake, I do not

know.

My tribe, as our old men tell us, after they got corn, abandoned their

villages at Devils Lake, and joined the Mandans near the mouth of the

Heart River. The Mandans helped them build new villages here, near their

own. I think this was hundreds of years ago.

Firewood growing scarce, the two tribes removed up the Missouri to the

mouth of the Knife River, where they built the Five Villages, as they

called them. Smallpox was brought to my people here, by traders. In a

single year, more than half my tribe died, and of the Mandans, even more.

Those who survived removed up the Missouri and built a village at

Like-a-fishhook bend, where they lived together, Hidatsas and Mandans,

as one tribe. This village we Hidatsas called Mu´a-idu´skupe-hi´cec, or

Like-a-fishhook village, after the bend on which it stood; but white men

called it Fort Berthold, from a trading post that was there.

We lived in Like-a-fishhook village about forty years, or until 1885,

when the government began to place families on allotments.

The agriculture of the Hidatsas, as I now describe it, I saw practiced in

the gardens of Like-a-fishhook village, in my girlhood, before my tribe

owned plows.

[Illustration: An earth lodge

Note ladder at right of lodge entrance. Drying stage before entrance

lacks the usual railings. (Photograph by courtesy of Rev. George

Curtis.)]

[Illustration: Like-a-fishhook village in process of being dismantled

(about 1885)

Drying stage in foreground is floored Arikara fashion with a mat of

willows. The Arikaras at this time had joined the Hidatsa-Mandans.

(Photograph by courtesy of Rev. George Curtis.)]

Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians: An Indian Interpretation · 第 1 / 13 章