PANIC

Truth, Jan. 16, 1890.

O TRUTH!――Cowed and humiliated, I acknowledge that our Oscar is at

last original. At bay, and sublime in his agony, he certainly has, for

once, borrowed from no living author, and comes out in his own true

colours――as his own “gentleman.”

How shall I stand against his just anger, and his damning allegations!

for it must be clear to your readers, that, besides his clean polish,

as prettily set forth in his epistle, I, alas! am but the “ill-bred and

ignorant person,” whose “lucubrations” “it is a trouble” for him “to

notice.”

Still will I, desperate as is my condition, point out that though

“impertinent,” “venomous,” and “vulgar,” he claims me as his

“master”――and, in the dock, bases his innocence upon such relation

between us.

In all humility, therefore, I admit that the outcome of my “silly

vanity and incompetent mediocrity,” must be the incarnation: “OSCAR

WILDE.”

J. A. McN. WHISTLER.

_Mea culpa!_ the Gods may perhaps forgive and forget.

To you, _Truth_――champion of the truth――I leave the brave task of

proclaiming again that the story of the lecture to the students of the

Royal Academy was, as I told it to you, no fiction.

In the presence of Mr Waldo Story did Oscar make his prayer for

preparation; and at his table was he entrusted with the materials for

his crime.

You also shall again unearth, in the _Nineteenth Century Review_ of

Jan. 1889, page 37, the other appropriated property, slily stowed away,

in an article on “The Decay of Lying”――though why Decay!

To shirk this matter thus is craven, doubtless; but I am awe-stricken

and tremble, for truly, “the rage of the sheep is terrible!”

J. A. McN. WHISTLER.

Wilde v Whistler Being an Acrimonious Correspondence on Art Between Oscar Wilde and James A McNeill Whistler · 第 16 / 17 题