CHAPTER CXXX.

CHILDREN AND KITTENS. APHORISMS ASCRIBED TO THE LAUREATE, DR. SOUTHEY.

MORE COLUMBIAN PHILOSOPHY.

Oh! if in after life we could but gather

The very refuse of our youthful hours!

CHARLES LLOYD.

O dear little children, you who are in the happiest season of human

life, how will you delight in the Story of the Three Bears, when Mamma

reads it to you out of this nice book, or Papa, or some fond Uncle,

kind Aunt, or doting Sister! Papa and Uncle, will do the Great, Huge

Bear, best; but Sister, and Aunt, and Mamma, will excel them in the

Little, Small, Wee Bear, with his little, small, wee voice. And O Papa

and Uncle, if you are like such a Father and such an Uncle as are at

this moment in my mind's eye, how will you delight in it, both for the

sake of that small, but “fit audience,” and because you will perceive

how justly it may be said to be

—a well-writ story,

Where each word stands so well placed that it passes

Inquisitive detraction to correct.[1]

[Footnote 1: DAVENPORT.]

It is said to be a saying of Dr. Southey's, that “a house is never

perfectly furnished for enjoyment, unless there is a child in it

rising three years old, and a kitten rising six weeks.”

Observe, reader; this is repeated upon _On-dit's_ authority, which is

never to be taken for more than it is worth. I do not affirm that Dr.

Southey has said this, but he is likely enough to have said it; for I

know that he sometimes dates his letters from Cat's Eden. And if he

did say so, I agree with him, and so did the Doctor; he _specialiter_

as regards the child, I _specialiter_ as regards the kitten.

Kitten is in the animal world what the rosebud is in the garden; the

one the most beautiful of all young creatures, the other the loveliest

of all opening flowers. The rose loses only something in delicacy by

its developement,—enough to make it a serious emblem to a pensive

mind; but if a cat could remember kittenhood, as we remember our

youth, it were enough to break a cat's heart, even if it had nine

times nine heart strings.

Do not the flowers spring fresh and gay,

Pleasant and sweet, in the month of May;

And when their time cometh they fade away.[2]

[Footnote 2: LUSTY JUVENTUS.]

It is another saying of the Laureate's, according to _On-dit_, that,

“live as long as you may, the first twenty years are the longest half

of your life.” They appear so while they are passing; they seem to

have been so when we look back upon them; and they take up more room

in our memory than all the years that succeed them.

But in how strong a light has this been placed by the American teacher

Jacob Abbott whose writings have obtained so wide a circulation in

England. “Life, he says, if you understand by it the season of

preparation for eternity, is more than half gone;—life so far as it

presents opportunities and facilities for penitence and pardon,—so far

as it bears on the formation of character, and is to be considered as

a period of probation,—is unquestionably more than half gone, to those

who are between fifteen and twenty. In a vast number of cases it is

more than half gone, even in _duration_: and if we consider the

thousand influences which crowd around the years of childhood and

youth, winning us to religion, and making a surrender of ourselves to

Jehovah easy and pleasant,—and, on the other hand, look forward beyond

the years of maturity, and see these influences losing all their

power, and the heart becoming harder and harder under the deadening

effects of continuance in sin,—we shall not doubt a moment that the

years of immaturity make a far more important part of our time of

probation than all those that follow.”

That pious man, who, while he lived, was the Honourable Charles How,

and might properly now be called the honoured, says, that, “twenty

years might be deducted for education, from the three score and ten,

which are the allotted sum of human life; this portion,” he observes,

“is a time of discipline and restraint, and young people are never

easy till they are got over it.”

There is, indeed, during those years, much of restraint, of

wearisomeness, of hope, and of impatience; all which feelings lengthen

the apparent duration of time. Suffering, I have not included here;

but with a large portion of the human race, in all Christian

countries, (to our shame be it spoken!) it makes a large item in the

account: there is no other stage of life in which so much gratuitous

suffering is endured,—so much that might have been spared,—so much

that is a mere wanton, wicked addition, to the sum of human

misery,—arising solely and directly from want of feeling in others,

their obduracy, their caprice, their stupidity, their malignity, their

cupidity and their cruelty.

_Algunos sabios han dicho que para lo que el hombre tiene aprender es

muy corta la vida; mas yo añado que es muy larga para los que hemos de

padecer._ “Some wise men,” writes Capmany, “have said that life is

very short for what man has to learn,—but I (he says) must add, that

it is very long for what we have to suffer.” Too surely this is but

too true; and yet a more consolatory view may be taken of human

existence. The shortest life is long enough for those who are more

sinned against than sinning; whose good instincts have not been

corrupted, and whose evil propensities have either not been called

into action, or have been successfully resisted and overcome.

The Philosopher of Doncaster found, in his theory of progressive

existence, an easy solution for some of those questions on which it is

more presumptuous than edifying to speculate, yet whereon that

restless curiosity which man derives from the leaven of the forbidden

fruit, makes it difficult for a busy mind to refrain from speculating.

The horrid opinion which certain Fathers entertained concerning the

souls of unbaptized infants, he never characterized by any lighter

epithet than _damnable_, for he used to say, “it would be wicked to

use a weaker expression:” and the more charitable notion of the Limbo

he regarded as a cold fancy, neither consonant to the heart of man,

nor consistent with the wisdom and goodness of the Creator. He thought

that when the ascent of being has been from good to better through all

its stages, in moral qualities as well as in physical developement,

the immortal spirit might reach its human stage in such a state that

it required nothing more than the vehicle of humanity, and might be

spared its probation. As Enoch had been translated without passing

through death, so he thought such happy spirits might be admitted into

a higher sphere of existence without passing through the trials of sin

and the discipline of sorrow.

The doctor, &c., vol. 4 (of 7) · 第 25 / 31 章