BY MRS. JOHN LILLIE.

One evening toward the close of the sixteenth century, a group of

gentlemen were hurrying up the staircases and along the corridors of a

house in Florence.

They were richly dressed, according to the custom of the time. But they

were all students, all deeply absorbed in music, and they were on their

way to the salons of one Giovanni Bardi, Conte di Vernio, for the

purpose of discussing a new idea in their beloved art.

Now if we followed these gentlemen, what should we hear and see?

Something very interesting, but, from our point of view to-day, very

strange; for they were determined to develop _opera_, yet they had but

the vaguest idea how it should be done.

Opera in its present form had so far been unheard of. The only idea

these Italian gentlemen had of it was from the Greek lyrical dramas. You

know that in ancient Athens there was a famous theatre where plays were

given, accompanied by an orchestra of lyres and flutes. The chorus of

the _Agamemnon_ was sung, and some of the dialogue was given in a sort

of recitative. Then, in early English times, music, or recitatives was

introduced into the simple plays usually performed in the public

streets. People in various countries had been gifted with some

perception of the beauty of music and dialogue, but a regular opera, as

I have said, was unknown.

Our Italian gentlemen discussed this idea over and over again, and some

efforts were made to carry it out. One of these gentlemen, named

Caccini, wrote a series of songs or "pieces," which he sang at Bardi's

house one evening, accompanying himself on the lute. He had a beautiful

voice, and every one was delighted.

Little by little the idea of a musical drama gathered strength, and one

of the first performances we read of was at Mantua, in 1594, when a

curious sort of work called _L'Amfiparnasso_ was given. We who have seen

opera in its perfection would be, I am sure, highly amused could we hear

_L'Amfiparnasso_ given just as it was then.

There were five voices, no overture, and no instrumental accompaniment

of any kind. But when two singers were on the stage, the remaining three

stood behind the scenes singing a sort of accompaniment. Everybody in

Mantua was delighted, and _L'Amfiparnasso_ was a great success.

What would dear old Master Vecchio, who wrote it, have said had he

looked ahead nearly three hundred years, and seen the great Bayreuth

Festival, where Wagner's operas were produced with such a wealth of

orchestra and voices?

I think it safe to say that the first true Italian opera, on which all

others have been founded, was _Euridice_, by Peri, and this was produced

in 1600, when Henry IV. married Mary of Medicis. Several noblemen

performed in it. Behind the scenes they had a sort of orchestra: a

harpsichord, a chitarone,[1] a sort of viol, and a large lute. Three

flutes were added to this little orchestra. I have just been reading

part of the score, and it has much delicacy and spirit.

[1] A very long double-necked lute with wire strings and two sets of

tuning-pegs. An old chitarone is preserved in the South Kensington

Museum.

I have not space to tell you of the progress of the opera in Italy and

Germany and France, but it advanced steadily, and in France, where a

composer named Lulli lived in 1650, it reached a great height. Lulli had

been brought from Florence as a page at the court of Louis XIV. He

served the King's niece, Mademoiselle De Montpensier, and no doubt heard

all the finest music in her boudoir. He it was who established the opera

in France.

Among Italian composers of this early period, the man who seems to me

most interesting was Alessandro Scarlatti. He made many improvements in

the form of the opera, varying its monotony in very original ways.

Another famous Italian of the same period was Stradella, whose church

music we hear now much more than formerly. Poor Stradella's life was a

terribly sad one. He was a gentleman of great refinement, but he was not

of the highest rank, so that when he fell in love with one of his

pupils, whose rank was above his, there was a great deal of excitement

over it in Venice. Stradella married his fair pupil, and for some years

led a life of terror, as assassins pursued him. Once, we are told, three

of these men, hired to kill him, followed him to the Church of St. John,

in Rome, where he was to sing, and there, listening to his heavenly

voice, their purpose changed. His music took away all their

blood-thirsty feelings. But he was not destined to escape the vengeance

of his wife's friends. In Genoa, after repeated attempts on Stradella's

life, he and his wife were both cruelly stabbed to death, the assassins

escaping. Stradella was only in his thirtieth year, but he had written

some of the finest music in Italy.

I could tell you much of the rise and progress of opera in England, but

in our short space must group a few facts about some one centre. The

English seemed from very early times to delight in combining music with

dialogue. They used, as I have said, to give performances in the public

streets. The singers stood in large carts, around which crowds of people

collected. With all their grotesqueness and absurdity there was a

dignity about them which impressed their rude audiences.

[Illustration]

In 1658 was born in London a boy named Henry Purcell. Music seemed to

grow with him. When he was very young he was put into the choir school

at Westminster Abbey, and it was only the other day I was standing in

the old school-room where the boy Purcell sat, and looking at a quaint

old picture of him which hangs upon the wall.

The Westminster boys were taught music very fairly by old Cook and

Humphries. It must have been a cheerful life. To-day the school has been

enlarged and beautified, but even then it surely possessed the charm of

peace, and yet great harmonies, for it stands almost in the shelter of

the Abbey, and all day long the boys had the dear old cloisters to run

about in, and twice a day they listened to glorious music on the organ.

Purcell grew full of musical fire, and when he was eighteen he was

appointed organist of the great Abbey. He wrote constantly--catches,

glees, songs, and hymns, which to this day are listened to and sung with

delight.

It was when Purcell was about nineteen that he one day received an

invitation from a school-master to call, on musical business, at his

house in Chelsea. Thither he went. He found a young ladies' school, and

an energetic master who wished his pupils to perform something operatic.

So Purcell wrote the music, and Tate the words, of _Dido and Æneas_, a

little operetta, in which he himself performed, and which was so

successful that henceforth he wrote chiefly for the stage.

But all the time everybody in London was singing or playing his glees

and madrigals. In Westminster was a famous old tavern known as Purcell's

Head, and clubs used to meet there to sing his music. Meanwhile we can

fancy Milton as a youth playing his most solemn music in that quaint

room of his with its faded hangings and grand organ, and at the theatre

elaborate performances of _The Tempest_, _The Indian Queen_, and other

plays, to which was added "Mr. Purcell's musicke."

Those were rollicking and riotous times. Purcell's sweet music seems to

come in with some feeling of soothing sounds, but had the times been

better, he would have done more, I am sure, in his noblest direction.

Everything at court and around it was careless and reckless. Dryden, the

poet, who wrote many of the plays for which Purcell furnished music,

bitterly regretted when he was older that he had wasted so much time

amusing an ungodly people. Purcell seems only to have thought of his

music, and certainly at this date, two hundred years after his death,

his sweetness and charm are as strongly felt. In 1695 he died, and his

tomb is in the Abbey where his childish feet so often passed and

repassed, and beneath the organ where he so often played in his most

innocent and most happy years.

Opera seems from the end of the seventeenth century to have gone on

gaining new force and beauty in every country, and to-day it is supposed

by some critics to have attained its highest form in Wagner's music. I

fear those eager Italian gentlemen who used to meet in Conte Vernio's

brilliant rooms would be very much alarmed by some of the German operas

of to-day, and I own that, with all love of Wagner's great music, there

is a peculiar charm in the old airs of operas which people try to scoff

at now. Ten minutes ago an organ-grinder stopped under my window and

began droning out "Ai nostri morte," that sweet air in Verdi's

_Trovatore_, and I felt as if it was very near the Italy of the

seventeenth century. But this must not make you think that Wagner has

not science and strength and the utmost beauty on his side.

[Illustration: WHAT THE SPRING BROUGHT TO LITTLE LAME ELSIE.]

Harper's Young People, March 28, 1882 An Illustrated Weekly · 第 7 / 63 题