ANSWER.

Duties upon exports, though they may answer in some particulars a

convenience to the country which imposes them, are certainly not things

to be contended for, as if the very being of a State was interested in

preserving them. Where there is a kind of monopoly they may sometimes

be ventured upon, but even there perhaps more is lost by imposing such

duties, than is compensated for by any advantage. Where there is not a

species of monopoly, no policy can be more absurd. The American States,

are so circumstanced that some of the States necessarily export part of

the produce of neighboring ones. Every duty laid upon such exported

produce operates in fact as a tax by the exporting State upon the

non-exporting State. In a system expressly formed to produce concord

among all, it would have been very unwise to have left such a source

of discord open; and upon the same principle, and to remove as much as

possible every ground of discontent, Congress itself are prohibited

from laying duties on exports, because by that means those States which

have a great deal of produce to export would be taxed much more heavily

than those which had little or none for exportation.

Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States Published During Its Discussion by the People 1787-1788 · 第 102 / 257 题