CHAPTER VI

ENGLAND AT PLAY

"These English take their pleasures sadly," said a French wit. It was a

misunderstanding of the national expression. The Englishman takes his

pleasures not sadly but resolutely. It is a holiday. He is out to enjoy

himself. He _will_ enjoy himself whatever the obstacles. There is a grim

resolve in his mind. But he is not sad: he is resolutely merry. That look

on his face is not agony; it is stern determination.

I have seen Hampstead Heath on the midsummer Bank Holiday. A frowning sky,

a bleak wind, and occasional gusty showers of rain declared the day to be

not of midsummer and not suitable to open-air holiday. But the East End was

not to be deterred from merriment. "London's playground" was like a huge

ant-hill with swarming holiday-makers, and all had made up their dogged

English minds to rejoice and be merry. That was apparent from the first.

In the "Tube" railways girls of from sixteen to sixty--all girly--giggled

hilariously at everything and anything and nothing. "It's from the other

side" announced one on the train platform; and this fact about the train's

going was greeted with shouting laughter, and the "joke" went round a

widening circle of rippling merriment. On the road, the coster's cart,

loaded with Mr. and Mrs. Coster and a group of Costerlings--the

numerousness of which said "no race suicide here"--scattered abroad song,

vociferous if not tuneful. When a shower came the song grew louder, as

though to smother the weather.

Commerce helped the people's resolve to be gay. You could buy a bag of

confetti for a halfpenny; for the same sum a stick adorned with bright

paper streamers, or a tuft of gorgeously-dyed flax. A penny provided a

tartan cap in paper, wearing which one might be quite ridiculously gay. The

oceans had been dredged and the earth rifled for the people's holiday.

Shellfish of all sorts, bananas from the West Indies, plums from Spain,

roses from Kent and Surrey, pine-apple tinned at Singapore, bright nacre

shells from Australian beaches, little love-birds from Papua trained as

"fortune-tellers" to pick out a paper telling you of the happiness in store

for you--all these were at your service; and the standard price was one

penny. A few coppers opened up for the holiday Englishman the resources of

a whole Empire.

Over all lowered a grey sky. But what mattered that! The factory girls

danced on the gravel paths to the music of barrel organs (sometimes,

indeed, of the humble mouth organ), danced often with verve, and always

with hilarity. The Australian larrikin and his "donah" dance at "down the

harbor" picnics with a fixed solemnity of face, as if performing some weird

corybantic rite. The London coster and his girl are determinedly merry. The

merriment may be in some cases forced, but it is forced with grit. A dance

on the road is broken up to allow a cart to slowly creep past. It is

resumed with perfect good humour, and with the same gay whoops.

Yet there is nothing orgiastic in the merriment. Among the many many

thousands you may notice here and there a man and--far worse

sight--occasionally a girl the worse for drink, prompting the thought that

if public opinion won't keep women out of the bars the licensing law

should; but the great mass of the crowd is quite sober: the merriment is

not vinous.

If dancing, shouting, or "spooning"--discouraged neither by the gaze of the

public nor the dampness of the weather--did not amuse, there were more

intellectual amusements. You might have your head read for a penny, your

character diagnosed by your eye for the same sum; or you might see an old

man making a fairly good pretence of hanging himself, and he left it to

your honesty to subscribe the penny.

The Englishman take his pleasures sadly? Not a bit of it. That roar from

the Old Bull and Bush, the crackling laughter around all the booths and

from all the crowded paths, tell that the Englishman can become very gay on

quite slight encouragement.

A day at Southend, another great "popular place of amusement," gives the

same impression of resolute gaiety. A good-humoured crowd packs the

cheap-trip trains. There are more passengers than seats; and young fellows

take it amiably in turn to stand, leaving the elders and the womenfolk to

sit throughout. At Southend there is no beach, as one understands the term

elsewhere--a scimitar curve of gleaming sand on which blue waves break,

showing their white teeth in smiles. The "beach" is just a flat, which at

high tide the sea covers, to leave it at low tide a wide muddy expanse of

marshy soil. But the seaside trippers make the best of it. The cliffs are

thronged with happy picnickers. The beach is dotted with waders, who go out

many hundreds of yards along the wet flat, and in some mysterious way enjoy

themselves. Where at last the water starts there are bathers disporting

from boats. A pier which stretches out its long straightness and suggests a

task rather than a pleasure, is filled with happy promenaders, who sniff up

the smell of the seaweed and recognise it as ozone. They mostly wear

yachting caps, or some other costume sign of the seaside, and an air of

nautical adventure.

Yes, the Englishman has a great faculty of enjoying himself. I am indeed

struck, in many aspects of life, at the Englishman's faculty of being

cheerful under what one would consider depressing conditions. The

Englishman does not hesitate to take his girl to the cemetery to court her.

A London friend asked me, with real enthusiasm, to look at the "fine view"

from his flat, and it looked out on an old Plague Cemetery, where the

victims of the London plague nourish the green of the trees. The Englishman

take his pleasures sadly? Rather he takes his sadnesses pleasurably.

It is the Englishman of the industrial classes I have pictured amusing

himself. As to the richer folk, is there anything fresh to be said? Does

not every one at least think that he knows? Have not "society" novelists

innumerable, from "Ouida" downwards, given us studies of English "society"

people at play, making the home life of the duke open for inspection by the

meanest intelligence? Are there not numberless penny and halfpenny papers

carrying on the good work to this day?

If one can contrive to put out of one's mind all that nonsense and observe

with intelligence, one will find that the middle-class Englishman and the

rich Englishman amuse themselves after very much the same manner as do the

people of the poorer classes. They refine on the methods, but the spirit

is the same. At heart, the Englishman of all classes loves feasting and

boisterous jollity. Education and breeding may modify his tastes, but they

are still there. _Au fond_, the typical Englishman likes best a joke that

has a savour of the "practical" in it. Give him his natural rein, and

duke's son, cook's son--if there are any English cooks left to have

sons--will lightly incline his thoughts to horseplay when he wishes to be

genuinely amused.

Yet perhaps this, too, passes. I remember thinking so, Lord Mayor's Day

1909, when the procession through the city proved to be not a "show," but a

display of the defence guards of the nation. Perhaps this may be taken as a

hint of a growing earnestness in English life, of a recognition of stern

struggles to come and only to be met with resolved and steady vigour. It

had, of a surety, some significance--the sudden casting off on the city's

great festival day of an old habit of childish play and the putting in its

place of a display of soldiers and sailors, and boys who will one day be

soldiers and sailors. Of some significance, too, was the ready, popular

acquiescence in the change. Crowds that had been for years regaled on such

occasions with broad pantomime, all fun and levity, were faced of a sudden

with serious drama--soldiers in glittering mail, still more impressive

soldiers in uniforms of the colour of earth; Boy Scouts playing at being

soldiers and enjoying the most wholesome game; war paraphernalia of wagons

and field telegraphs and field hospitals, and guns of all kinds, from the

great mastiff siege-guns drawn by eight horses, which the Navy taught the

Army to make mobile, down to the vicious little terrier pom-poms. And the

people cheered the change. There was no hint at a protest against the

departure from the stage of the old vanities. After a quieter method than

that which came of Savonarola's teaching, but none the less surely, they

had gone to destruction, and in their place was a dutiful parade of

citizens armed for the defence of their homes: and the people approved. The

Balaclava veterans and the Boy Scouts shared the honours of the day. Gog

and Magog were not; but the crowd would have its symbolism, and cheered the

ideal of tried valour, the ideal of aspiring youth, as they saw them

seriously personified.

[Illustration: CRICKET AT LORD'S]

In 1910 and 1911 there was the same "sober-minded" Lord Mayor's Day; and

the old pantomime procession clearly will never be revived. Perhaps now the

English nation is at last "growing up" to be too old for such elemental

humours. If so, does the fact speak for good augury or evil augury? I

wonder. A well-known Scottish artist of the day, who lives in Paris

"because it is the place for all rebels and all ideas," and sells his

pictures in London and America, told me once very solemnly, "When the

English people get artistic and witty they are going to go down. It is the

Philistinism of England that proves her national strength and sanity." I

reassured him by telling him that most of the statues erected in England

nowadays were those of men in trousers, and we were comforted to think that

there was still enough of Philistinism in England to keep her safe and

sound. But it does look as though the Englishman were losing his enjoyment

of primitive humour when he vetoes Gog and Magog on Lord Mayor's Day. Also

he begins to live in hotels and to dine at restaurants when he is not

travelling. Yes, on the surface all peoples grow sadly alike, and that

charm of travel which comes from the stimulating contact of the mind with

the more obvious differences between lands and peoples threatens to vanish

in a generation or two, through the fashion of admiring all countries but

one's own spreading, and through each country learning to imitate some

other. Still, the threat has been often made before without justifying

itself. In Shakespeare's time it was Italy

Whose manners still our tardy apish nation

Limps after in base imitation.

But we did not in the end become Italians. In spite of surface imitations

the deeper differences which come from the tap-roots of nations remain.

The Lord Mayor's Day of the old style of buffoonery is dead. But there is,

on the other hand, a movement in England nowadays--a happy and wholesome

movement--to revive the festivities of May Day, which once was the great

festival of the country-side. The old chronicles in their descriptions of

May Day rejoicings provide a very delectable picture. This from Bourne:--

On the calends or first of May, commonly called May

Day, the Juvenile part of both sexes were wont to rise

a little after midnight and walk to some neighbouring

wood accompanied with music and blowing of horns, where

they break down branches of trees and adorn them with

nosegays and crowns of flowers; when this is done they

return homewards about the rising of the sun and make

their doors and windows to triumph with their flowery

spoils and the after part of the day is chiefly spent

in dancing round a tall pole, called a May-pole and

being placed in a convenient part of the village stands

there, as it were consecrated to the Goddess of Flowers

without the least violation being offered to it in the

whole circle of the year.

Stubbes, writing in 1595, describes closely the bringing home of the

May-pole:--

Against May Day ... every parish, towne or village

assemble themselves, both men, women and children and

either all together or dividing themselves into

companies, they goe some to the woods and groves some

to the hills and mountains where they spend all the

night in pleasant pastime and in the morning return

bringing with them birch boughs and branches of trees

to deck their assemblies withal. But their chiefest

jewel they bring thence is the Maie pole which they

bring home with great veneration as thus--they have

twentie to fortie yoake of oxen, every oxe having a

sweet nosegaie of flowers tied to the top of his horns,

and these oxen draw home the Maypoale which they

covered all over with flowers and herbes bound round

with strings from the top to the bottome and sometimes

it was painted with colours, having two or three

hundred men, women and children following in great

devotion.... Then fall they to banquetting and

feasting, to leaping and dancing about it, as heathen

people did at the dedication of their idols.

Hall, in his _Chronicle_ of the time of Henry VIII., tells how the feast of

May Day was sometimes accompanied by a kind of historical pageant. This is

from his description of a May Day in the seventh year of the reign of Henry

VIII.:--

The King and Queen accompanied with many lordes and

ladies rode in the high ground of Shooter's Hill to

take the open air and as they passed by the way they

espied a company of tall yeomen clothed all in green

with green whodes and bows and arrowes to the number of

two hundred. Then one of them which called himself

Robin Hood came to the King, desiring him to see his

men shoot, and the King was content. Then he whistled

and all the two hundred archers shot and losed at once

and then he whistled again and they likewise shot

again, their arrows whistled by craft of the head, so

that the noise was strange and great and much pleased

the company. All these archers were of the King's guard

and had thus apparelled themselves to make solace to

the King. Then Robin Hood desired the King and Queen to

come into the green wood and to see how the outlaws

live. The King demanded of the Queen and her ladies if

they durst venture to go into the wood with so many

outlawes. Then the Queen said that if it pleased him

she was content, then the horns blew till they came to

the wood under Shooter's Hill, and there was an arbour

made of bows with a hall and a great chamber and an

inner chamber very well made and covered with flowers

and herbes which the King much praised. Then said Robin

Hood, Sir, outlaw's breakfast is venison and therefore

you must be content with such fare as we use. Then the

King and Queen sat down and were served with venison

and wine by Robin Hood and his men. Then the King

departed and his company and Robin Hood and his men

them conducted.

I have spoken, so far, of "amusement" only. There are other forms of play.

There is "sport." Now sport must not be considered an amusement merely in

England. It is a vital absorbing affair of life, a "bemusement" rather.

Some serious-minded folk in London still tell, with deprecation, of

incidents of the time of the South African War, when the evening newspaper

contents bills showed that there was a keener attraction for coppers in

news of the cricket matches than in news of the campaign. But even these

serious-minded people themselves probably have often bought a paper which

recorded a century in a Test Match in preference to one which gave some

news of national importance; and have murmured to themselves in excuse

something that the dour old Duke of Wellington probably never said, about

the Battle of Waterloo having been won on the playing fields of Eton.

"Sport," indeed, is so much a part of English life that it could never be

uprooted without making some vital change in the national character--and,

perhaps, not a change for the better.

One thing the passion for sport does give to the Englishman, and that is a

passion for fair play. There is not in any other nation of the world such

a nice sense of manly honour. "Give him a sporting chance" means that you

must take no unfair advantage of an enemy. "Take it like a sport" means

that you must not be merely a cheerful winner, but must be ready to face

losses and set-backs with equanimity.

When the small English boy goes to school the question is solemnly asked as

to what sports he will take up. This is of at least equal importance with

the other question as to what professional or business career he will

follow in the future. Often it is counted of greater moment. Will the

youngster be good at cricket, or football, or rowing? On that hinges the

degree of his greatness in his world's estimation for quite a number of

years. Cricket is, on the whole, the most important. To be a classic bat,

to be a deadly slow bowler, or a still more deadly fast bowler--that is

greatness for the young man. The cricket matches between the great public

schools, the universities, the counties, are the chief pre-occupation of a

large proportion of England during the summer months. Football grips more

among the industrial classes, cricket more among the professional and

administrative classes. Between them they keep a great part of England

excited from one year's end to the other.

There are, of course, other sports of the schools--running, jumping, lawn

tennis, hockey and the like. But they usually are just allowed to fill in

gaps between cricket and football. Manhood, however, adds to the list of

sports largely. There is golf. "If you find that golf interferes with your

business, give up your business," runs a popular gibe. It accentuates,

without misrepresenting acutely, the attitude taken up by very many

Englishmen and Englishwomen on the subject of golf. They live in a district

because of its golf facilities, shape their holiday resorts by the golf

they offer, reckon their days by the chances they offer for golf.

Horse-racing is another great English sport, in which few take an active

part, but in which a vast multitude has a share of interest either as

spectators or as speculators. It claims such a huge share of English

attention that one definition of the English is, "a horse-racing nation";

and wherever an English town is built in any part of the world it will have

a race-course almost as soon as it has a church and a school. The various

race-meetings throughout the year in England vary in their social

character. The Derby is a great popular event, to see which the East End of

London pours itself out on the Surrey roads. Goodwood, on the other hand,

is very much a "society" meeting.

The tale is not yet complete. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of

Englishmen find it necessary to life to disport on water during the

summer--yachting, skiff-rowing, punting, or canoeing. Hunting is mostly the

sport of the well-to-do, though an otter-hunt calls a whole country-side to

its excitement, demanding of no one either that he should be mounted or

that he should be rich.

Fox-hunting is of the very marrow of the English character. "The

unspeakable pursuing the uneatable," said Wilde savagely of the English

squire pursuing the fox; and thereby proved his utter un-Englishness. To

sneer at fox-hunting! It is a step towards atheism. Once upon a time I

remember going out into the yard of a little village public-house on the

Monaro (Australia) and seeing chained up in the yard a fox. I stopped to

ask why, and the groom told me of an English tourist who had also inquired

as to the fox, and who had learned incidentally that poison was laid for

foxes on the Monaro because they had become a pest; and, so learning, had

set his face at once away from a land where such barbarities were possible.

He did not reckon his own life safe, I suppose, in a country where foxes

were poisoned.

[Illustration: TROUT-FISHING ON THE ITCHEN, HAMPSHIRE]

The pheasant _battues_, which are one of the autumn games of the rich in

England, I would hardly dignify as "sport." They are the growth of the

recent times of great fortunes, and scarcely a wholesome sign, I think.

Grouse-shooting _en battue_ is more tolerable as a sport, for at least the

birds are wild-bred.

But one may not even catalogue all the sports of England in a chapter. I

find that fishing--in all its phases: salmon, trout, deep-sea, and the

rest--asks attention, and may not have it. One final note: the Englishman,

for all his present sports, is hospitable to welcome others, and often

takes them up to excel in them. In flying, for instance, the Englishman is

beginning now to take a place after the French. And I can recollect, as

late as the end of 1909, a Flying Meeting at Doncaster at which not a

single Englishman took the air. Within a little more than two years what a

change!

That Doncaster Flying Meeting was the first ever held in England, and I was

one of those who travelled up to see the strange fowl in the air, birds of

the growth of the fabled roc winging steady flights around the field once

sacred to the horse. Badly treated by the weather, the "First Flying

Meeting in England" faced an outlook which was not too cheerful. Over a

sodden ground a grey sky lowered threateningly, and gusty winds, blowing

hither and thither, threatened storms. The great "birds" nestled within

their sheds, and a nervous committee went round lifting questioning hands

to the sky. If this day were a fiasco the meeting was ruined, and the

horses of Doncaster would have the laugh over their strange rivals.

Then the sun came out. The wind dropped to a zephyr's lightness. There

seemed no reason why the men should not fly, and they could fly. Whispers

went round hinting at delays which were condemnable because avoidable if

they were real. An official suggested that aviators had all the tricks and

uncertainties of the indispensable _prima donna assoluta_; that they had to

be humoured to take the stage when the call-bell rang. Devout prayers were

muttered for the day when aviation would be as common in England as

trick-cycling and stout, bejewelled promoters of flying meetings would

lounge haughtily in front of a long _queue_ of humble applicants for a

chance to appear, and country hotel-keepers would, with most particular

care, exact payment in advance from poor "artists" in flying who, in the

event of a bad season, had such inconvenient facilities for escaping

without footing the score. That time has almost come in England to-day. But

then in 1909 public and managers had to wait patiently on the gentlemen who

had improved on Prometheus and, harnessing the fire that he stole from

above, dared the assault of the very heavens.

Finally the flying did begin. But it was all by Frenchmen on French

machines. There was the Bleriot, aptly to be compared in shape to a

dragon-fly; the Farman, a long box trailing a baby box in its wake. The

Bleriot suggests a successful wooing, the Farman a scientific conquest, of

the air. The one soars and swoops and skims actually like a bird, the other

progresses with scientific and mathematical precision. One might imagine a

respectable barn-door fowl brood-mother, resting a while after the arduous

labours of the pheasant season, speculating dismally on the prospects of

being called upon to hatch out a brood of aeroplanes, and resolving to

accept with resignation a clutch of Bleriots but to draw the line firmly at

Farmans. No respectable fowl could give even the kinship of adoption to a

flying contrivance that suggests so strongly a collection of egg-boxes.

Since then Englishmen have learned to fly, and aeroplaning is becoming one

of the national sports. Also I see in some of the papers that because at

the last Olympic Games England got more of the dust than of the laurels,

the Englishman must set to work to learn to throw the javelin and the

discus farther than any one else; and I believe that a section of him will

accept the direction to do this and do it quite earnestly. So the

Englishman who practises at football, cricket, hunting, sailing, rowing,

fishing, running, walking, flying, shooting, must also learn to throw

strange things great distances. Withal he has his work to do, and some time

to give to the enjoyment of the beauty of his most beautiful England. A

wonderful people of a wonderful country!

England(#38790) · 第 6 / 13 章