"I ran over her accomplishments. Once upon a time I had heard her say

she could play 'Ah! vous dirai-je maman?' on the piano; but that was

long, long ago; that faint shadow of musical acquirement had died

out years before. She had also once been able to trace patterns very

nicely for muslin embroidery, but that was her nearest approach to the

accomplishment of drawing, and I did not think it would go very far.

Miss Matty's eyes were failing her, and I doubted if she could discover

the number of threads in a worsted-work pattern, or rightly appreciate

the different shades required for Queen Adelaide's face, in the loyal

wool-work now fashionable in Cranford."

The allusion to Queen Adelaide's face fixes the narrative between 1820

and 1830, and George Eliot was depicting the same unenlightened period

when she described the accomplishments provided by Ladies' Schools as

"certain small tinklings and smearings." Probably all of us can recall

an Aunt who tinkled on the piano, or a First Cousin once Removed who

smeared on Bristol Board. Lady Dorothy Nevill, whose invincible force

and evergreen memory carry down into the reign of King Edward VII. the

traditions of Queen Charlotte's Court, is a singularly accomplished

Aunt, and she has just made this remarkable confession: "At different

times I have attempted many kinds of amateur work, including book

illumination, leather-working, wood-carving, and, of late years, a kind

of old-fashioned paper-work, which consists in arranging little slips

of coloured paper into decorative designs, as was done at the end of

the eighteenth century. When completed, this work is made up into

boxes, trays, or mounts for pictures." Surely in this accomplishment

Miss Volumnia Dedlock lives again. And then Lady Dorothy, lapsing

into reminiscent vein, makes this rather half-hearted apology for the

domestic artistry of bygone days: "Years ago ladies used to spend much

more of their time in artistic work of some kind or other, for there

were not then the many distractions which exist to-day. Indeed, in

the country some sort of work was a positive necessity; and though,

no doubt, by far the greater portion of what was done was absolutely

hideous, useless, and horrible, yet it served the purpose of passing

away many an hour which otherwise would have been given up to

insufferable boredom."

Yes, the fashions of the world succeed one another in perpetual change;

but Boredom is eternally the enemy, and the paramount necessity of

escaping from it begets each year some new and strange activity. The

Aunt no longer paints in water-colours or keeps tame rabbits, flattens

ferns in an album, or traces crude designs with a hot poker on a deal

board. To-day she urges the impetuous bicycle, or, in more extreme

cases, directs the murderous motor; lectures on politics or platonics,

Icelandic art, or Kamschatkan literature. Perhaps she has a Cause or

a Mission pleads for the legal enforcement of Vegetarian Boots, or

tears down the knocker of a Statesman who refuses her the suffrage.

Perhaps her enthusiasms are less altruistic, and then she may pillage

her friends at Bridge, or supply the _New York Sewer_ with a weekly

column of Classy Cuttings. "Are you the _Daily Mail_?" incautiously

chirped a literary lady to an unknown friend who had rung her up on the

telephone. "No, I'm not, but I always thought you were," was the reply;

and so, in truth, she was.

XXIX

CIDER

An ingenious correspondent of mine has lately been visiting the

Brewers' Exhibition, and has come away from it full of Cider. I mean

"full" in the intellectual rather than the physical sense--full of

the subject, though unversed in the beverage. He reminds me that

Charles Lamb had his catalogue of "Books which are no books--_biblia

a-biblia_," among which he reckoned Court Calendars, Directories,

Pocket-books, Draughtboards bound and lettered on the back, Scientific

Treatises, Almanacs, Statutes at Large, and Paley's Moral Philosophy.

My correspondent suggests that, in a like spirit, a Brewer must have

his catalogue of Drinks which are no drinks--_pota a-pota_--and that

among them, if only the secret thoughts of his heart were known,

he must reckon Cider. Yet at the Brewers' Exhibition there was a

Literature of Cider, and that innocent-sounding beverage was quoted at

a price per bottle at which Claret is not ashamed to be sold. That the

men of Malt and Hops should thus officially recognize the existence

of fermented apple-juice strikes my friend as an Economy of Truth; a

suppression, or at least an evasion, of a deep-seated and absolute

belief. They cannot really regard Cider as a drink, and yet they give

it a place alongside that manly draught which has made old England what

she is. I, on the other hand, who always like to regard the actions

of my fellow-men in the most favourable light, prefer to think that

the Brewers have been employing some portion of that enforced leisure,

which the decay of their industry must have brought, in studying

English literature, and that they have thus been made acquainted with

the name and fame of Cider.

_Biblia a-biblia_ set me thinking of Lamb, and when once one begins

recalling "Elia" one drifts along, in a kind of waking reverie, from

one pleasant fantasy to another. _Biblia a-biblia_ led me on to "Dream

Children," and Dream Children to Dream Riddles--a reverie of my own

childhood, when we used to ask one another a pleasing conundrum which

played prettily on _In Cider_ and _Inside her_. But it made light of an

illustrious name and had better be forgotten.

Few, I fear, are the readers of John Philips, but, if such there be,

they will no doubt recall the only poem which, as far as I know, has

ever been devoted to the praise of Apple-wine. Philips was a patriotic

son of Herefordshire, and in Hereford Cathedral he lies buried under

bunches of marble apples which commemorate his poetical achievement:--

"What soil the apple loves, what care is due

To Orchats, timeliest when to press the fruits,

Thy gift, Pomona! in Miltonian verse,

Adventurous, I presume to sing; of verse

Nor skill'd nor studious; but my native soil

Invites me, and the theme as yet unsung."

"Orchats" is good; but how far these lines can be justly called

Miltonian is a question which my readers can decide for themselves. At

any rate, the poem contains more than four thousand lines exactly like

them, and they had the remarkable fortune to be translated into Italian

under the title of "Il Sidro." Philips was a Cavalier in all his tastes

and sympathies: but even the Puritans, whom he so cordially detested,

admitted the merits of Cider. Macaulay, with his characteristic love

of irrelevant particularity, insists on the fact that, through all

the commotions of the Great Rebellion and the Civil War, "the cream

overflowed the pails of Cheshire and the apple-juice foamed in the

presses of Herefordshire." Nor was it only in his purple prose that the

great rhetorician glorified the juice of the apple. Many a reader who

has forgotten all about John Philips will recall Macaulay's rhymes on

the garrulous country squire who had a habit of detaining people by the

button, and who was especially addicted to the society of Bishops:--

"His Grace Archbishop Manners-Sutton

Could not keep on a single button.

As for Right Reverend John of Chester,

His waistcoats open at the breasts are.

Our friend has filled a mighty trunk

With trophies torn from Bishop Monk,

And he has really tattered foully

The vestments of good Bishop Howley.

No buttons could I late discern on

The garments of Archbishop Vernon,

And never had his fingers mercy

Upon the garb of Bishop Percy;

While buttons fly from Bishop Ryder

Like corks that spring from bottled cyder."

From Macaulay and bottled Cyder (or Cider) the transition is easy to

that admirable delineator of life and manners, Mrs. Sherwood; she

was pretty much a contemporary of Macaulay's, and was a native of

Worcestershire, which in its Cider-bearing qualities is not far removed

from Herefordshire, beloved of Philips. Few but fit is the audience to

which Mrs. Sherwood still appeals; yet they who were nurtured on "The

Fairchild Family" still renew their youth as they peruse the adventures

of Lucy, Emily, and little Henry: "The farmer and his wife, whose name

was Freeman, were not people who lived in the fear of God, neither did

they bring up their children well; on which account Mr. Fairchild had

often forbidden Lucy, Emily, and Henry to go to their house." However,

go they did, as soon as their parents' backs were turned; and Mrs.

Freeman "gave them each a large piece of cake and something sweet to

drink, which, she said, would do them good." But it turned out to be

Cider, and did not do them good, for, "as they were never used to drink

anything but water, it made them quite drunk for a little while."

The mention of Worcestershire as a cider-growing county aptly

introduces my unfailing friend Lord Beaconsfield, for, though he is

less precise than I could wish in praise of Cider, he compliments it

indirectly in his pretty description of "a fair child, long-haired,

and blushing like a Worcestershire orchard before harvest-time." Once,

indeed, the lover of Disraelitish romance seems to find himself on

the track of Cider. Harry Coningsby is overtaken by a thunderstorm in

a forest, and, taking refuge in a sylvan inn, makes friends with a

mysterious stranger. The two travellers agree to dine together, when

this eminently natural dialogue ensues. "'But Ceres without Bacchus,'

said Coningsby, 'how does that do? Think you, under this roof, we could

invoke the god?'

"'Let us swear by his body that we will try,' said the stranger.

"Alas! the landlord was not a priest of Bacchus. But then these

enquiries led to the finest Perry in the world." If only the Perry had

been Cider, this quotation had been more apposite; but the themes,

though not identical, are cognate.

We have traced the praise of Cider in poetry and in romance, but it

also has its place in biography, and even in religious biography. One

of the most delightful portraits of a saint which was ever drawn is

Mrs. Oliphant's "Life of Edward Irving." In the autumn of 1834--the

last autumn of his life--that Prophet and man of God made a kind of

apostolic journey through Shropshire, Herefordshire, and Wales. From

Kington, in Herefordshire, he wrote to his wife: "My dinner was ham and

eggs, a cold fowl, an apple tart, and cheese; a tumbler of Cider, and

a glass of Sicilian Tokay." And he adds a tender reference to "Ginger

Wine in a long-necked decanter." It is always satisfactory to find the

good things of this life not reserved exclusively for bad people.

Sydney Smith, though a Canon of St. Paul's, was scarcely a Saint

and not at all a Prophet; and through the study-windows of his

beautiful parsonage in Somersetshire, he gazed on the glories of the

Cider-vintage with an eye more mundane than that of Edward Irving. In

1829 he wrote from Combe Florey--"the sacred valley of flowers," as he

loved to call it: "I continue to be delighted with the country. The

harvest is got in without any rain. The Cider is such an enormous crop

that it is sold at ten shillings a hogshead; so a human creature may

lose his reason for a penny."

Cider is, I believe, still drunk at Oxford; and memory retains grateful

recollections of Cider-cup beautiful as a liquid topaz, with a cluster

of blue flowers floating on its breast. But the Cider-Cellars of

London--places of, I fear, ill-regulated conviviality--have, as far as

I know, long since closed their doors. Yet they, too, have their secure

place in literature. The "Young Lion" of the _Daily Telegraph_, who

looked forward to succeeding Dr. W. H. Russell as War Correspondent of

the _Times_, thrilled with excitement at the prospect of inoculating

the Leading Journal with "the divine madness of our new style--the

style we have formed upon Sala. It blends the airy epicureanism of

the _salons_ of Augustus with the full-bodied gaiety of our English

Cider Cellar." But that was written in 1870, and the style and the

Cellars alike are things of the past. The official historian of Cider

excels in that "dry light" which is the grace of history, and gravely

tells us that "Cider (_Zider_, German) when first made in England was

called wine." With a proper reluctance to commit himself to what is

antecedently incredible, he adds that "the Earl of Manchester, when

Ambassador in France (1699), _is said_ to have passed off Cider for

Wine." It is more plausibly stated that in later days the innocuous

apple has been artfully mingled with the "foaming grape of Eastern

France," and has been drunk in England as Champagne. The Hock-cup at

Buckingham Palace is justly vaunted as one of the chief glories of

our ancient polity. It is certainly the most delectable drink that

ever refreshed a thirsty soul; and the art of concocting it is a

State-Secret of the most awful solemnity. But there never was a secret

which did not sooner or later elude its guardians; and I have heard

that a Royal cellarer, in an expansive moment, once revealed the spell.

German Wine and English Cider together constitute the Kingly Cup,

"And, blended, form, with artful strife,

The strength and harmony of life."

XXX

THE GARTER

"Breathes there a man, with soul so dead,

Who never to himself hath said----

I should uncommonly like to be a Knight of the Garter?" If such

there be, let him forswear this column and pass on to the Cotton

Market or the Education Bill. Here we cater for those in whom the

historic instinct is combined with picturesque sensibility, and who

love to trace the stream of the national life as it flows through

long-descended rites. Lord Acton wrote finely of "Institutions

which incorporate tradition and prolong the reign of the dead." No

institution fulfils this ideal more absolutely than the Order of the

Garter. One need not always "commence with the Deluge"; and there is no

occasion to consult the lively oracles of Mrs. Markham for the story of

the dropped garter and the chivalrous motto. It is enough to remember

that the Order links the last enchantments of the Middle Age with the

Twentieth Century, and that for at least four hundred years it has

played a real, though hidden, part in the secret strategy of English

Statecraft.

We are told by travellers that the Emperor of Lilliput rewarded his

courtiers with three fine silken threads of about six inches long, one

of which was blue, one red, and one green. The method by which these

rewards were obtained is thus described by an eye-witness: "The Emperor

holds a stick in his hands, both ends parallel to the horizon, while

the candidates, advancing one by one, sometimes leap over it, sometimes

creep under it, backwards and forwards, several times, according as

the stick is elevated or depressed. Whoever shows the most agility and

performs his part best of leaping and creeping is rewarded with the

blue coloured silk, the next with the red, and so on."

To-day we are not concerned with the red silk, wisely invented by

Sir Robert Walpole for the benefit of those who could not aspire to

the blue; nor with the green, which illustrates the continuous and

separate polity of the Northern Kingdom. The blue silk supplies us

with all the material we shall need. In its wider aspect of the Blue

Ribbon, it has its secure place in the art, the history, and the

literature of England; though perhaps the Dryasdusts of future ages

will be perplexed by the Manichæan associations which will then have

gathered round it. "When," they will ask, "and by what process, did

the ensign of a high chivalric Order which originated at a banquet

become the symbol of total abstinence from fermented drinks?" Even so,

a high-toned damsel from the State of Maine, regarding the Blue Ribbon

which girt Lord Granville's white waistcoat, congratulated him on the

boldness with which he displayed his colours, and then shrank back in

astonished horror as he raised his claret-glass to his lips. In one

of the prettiest of historical novels Amy Robsart is represented as

examining with childish wonder the various badges and decorations which

her husband wears, while Leicester, amused by her simplicity, explains

the significance of each. "The embroidered strap, as thou callest it,

around my knee," he said, "is the English Garter, an ornament which

Kings are proud to wear. See, here is the star which belongs to it, and

here is the diamond George, the jewel of the Order. You have heard how

King Edward and the Countess of Salisbury----" "Oh, I know all that

tale," said the Countess, slightly blushing, "and how a lady's garter

became the proudest badge of English chivalry."

There are certain families which may be styled "Garter Families," so

constant--almost unbroken--has been the tradition that the head of

the family should be a Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order. Such

is the House of Beaufort; is there not a great saloon at Badminton

walled entirely with portraits of Dukes of Beaufort in their flowing

mantles of Garter-Blue? Such is the House of Bedford, which has worn

the Garter from the reign of Henry VIII. till now; such the House

of Norfolk, which contrived to retain its Garters, though it often

lost its head, in times of civil commotion. The Dukes of Devonshire,

again, have been habitual Garter-wearers; and the fourteenth Earl of

Derby, though he refused a dukedom, was proud to accept an extra Garter

(raising the number of Knights above the statutory twenty-five), which

Queen Victoria gave him as a consolation for his eviction from the

Premiership in 1859. _Punch_, then, as now, no respecter of persons,

had an excellent cartoon of a blubbering child, to whom a gracious lady

soothingly remarks, "Did he have a nasty tumble, then? Here's something

pretty for him to play with." The Percys, again, were pre-eminently

a Garter Family; sixteen heads of the house have worn Blue silk. So

far as the male line was concerned, they came to an end in 1670. The

eventual heiress of the house married Sir Hugh Smithson, who acquired

the estates and assumed the name of the historic Percys. Having, in

virtue of this great alliance, been created Earl of Northumberland, Sir

Hugh begged George III. to give him the Garter. When the King demurred,

the aspirant exclaimed, in the bitterness of his heart, "I am the first

Northumberland who ever was refused the Garter." To which the King

replied, not unreasonably, "And you are the first Smithson who ever

asked for it." However, there are forms of political pressure to which

even Kings must yield, and people who had "borough influence" could

generally get their way when George III. wanted some trustworthy votes

in the House of Commons. So Sir Hugh Smithson died a Duke and a K.G.,

and since his day the Percys have been continuously Gartered.

But it is in the sphere of rank just below that of the "Garter

Families" that the Blue silk of Swift's imagination exercises its

most potent influence. Men who are placed by the circumstances of

their birth far beyond the temptations of mere cupidity, men who are

justly satisfied with their social position and have no special wish

to be transmogrified into marquises or dukes, are found to desire the

Garter with an almost passionate fondness. Many a curious vote in a

stand-or-fall division, many an unexpected declaration at a political

crisis, many a transfer of local influence at an important election has

been dictated by calculations about a possible Garter. It was this view

of the decoration which inspired Lord Melbourne when, to the suggestion

that he should take a vacant Garter for himself, he replied, "But

why should I? I don't want to bribe myself." This same light-hearted

statesman disputes with Lord Palmerston the credit of having said, "The

great beauty of the Garter is that there's no d---- d nonsense of merit

about it;" but it was undoubtedly Palmerston who declined to pay the

customary fees to the Dean and Chapter of Windsor, and on being gravely

told that, unless he paid, his banner could not be erected in St.

George's Chapel, replied that, as he never went to church at Windsor or

anywhere else, the omission would not much affect him.

What made the recent Chapter of the Garter peculiarly exciting to

such as have æsthetic as well as historic minds was the fact that,

for once, the Knights might be seen in the full splendour of their

magnificent costume. No other Order has so elaborate a paraphernalia,

and every detail smacks deliciously of the antique world. The long,

sweeping mantle of Garter-blue is worn over a surcoat and hood of

crimson velvet. The hat is trimmed with ostrich feathers and heron's

plumes. The enamelled collar swings majestically from shoulder to

shoulder; from it depends the image of St. George trampling down

the dragon; and round the left knee runs the Garter itself, setting

forth the motto of the Order in letters of gold. It is a truly regal

costume; and those who saw Lord Spencer so arrayed at the Coronation

of King Edward might have fancied that they were gazing on an animated

Vandyke. These full splendours of the Order are seldom seen, but some

modifications of them appear on stated occasions. The King was married

in the mantle of the Garter, worn over a Field-Marshal's uniform; and a

similar practice is observed at ceremonies in St. George's Chapel. The

Statutes of the Order bind every Knight, on his chivalric obedience,

to wear the badge--the "George," as it is technically called--at all

times and places. In obedience to this rule the Marquis of Abercorn,

who died in 1818, always went out shooting in the Blue Ribbon from

which, in ordinary dress, the badge depends. But those were the

days when people played cricket in tall hats and attended the House

of Commons in knee-breeches and silk stockings. Prince Albert, whose

conscience in ceremonial matters was even painfully acute, always

wore his Blue Ribbon over his shirt and below his waistcoat; and in

his ancient photographs it can be dimly traced crossing his chest in

the neighbourhood of his shirt studs. But to-day one chiefly sees it

at dinners. A tradition of the Order requires a Knight dining with

a brother-Knight to wear it, and after dinner one may meet it at an

evening party. The disuse of knee-breeches, except in Royal company,

makes it practically impossible to display the actual Garter; unless

one chooses to follow the example of the seventh Duke of Bedford, who,

being of a skinny habit and feeling the cold intensely, yet desiring to

display his Garter, used to wear it buckled round the trouser of his

left leg. Lord Beaconsfield, in his later years, used to appear in the

evening with a most magnificent Star of the Garter which had belonged

to the wicked Lord Hertford, Thackeray's Steyne and his own Monmouth.

It was a constellation of picked diamonds, surrounding St. George's

Cross in rubies. After Lord Beaconsfield's death it was exposed for

sale in a jeweller's window, and eventually was broken up and sold

piecemeal. There was an opportunity missed. Lord Rosebery ought to have

bought it, and kept it by him until he was entitled to wear it.

In picture-galleries one can trace the evolution of the Blue Ribbon

through several shades and shapes. In pictures of the Tudor and Stuart

periods it is a light blue ribbon, worn round the neck, with the George

hanging, like a locket, in front. In Georgian pictures the ribbon is

much darker, and is worn over the left shoulder, reaching down to the

right thigh, where the George is displayed. I have heard that the

alteration of position was due to the Duke of Monmouth, who, when a

little boy, accidentally thrust his right arm through the ribbon, with

a childish grace which fascinated his father. The change of colour was

due to the fact that the exiled King at St. Germain's affected still

to bestow the Order, and the English ribbon was made darker, so as to

obviate all possible confusion between the reality and the counterfeit.

Of late years, this reason having ceased to operate, the King has

returned to the lighter shade.

The last Commoner who wore the Garter was Sir Robert Walpole. Sir

Robert Peel refused it. It is the only honour which, I think, Mr.

Gladstone could have accepted without loss of dignity. For he truly was

a Knight _sans peur et sans reproche_, worthy to rank with those to

whom, in the purer days of chivalry, the Cross of St. George was not

the reward of an intrigue but the symbol of a faith.

XXXI

SHERIFFS

Seeing and Hearing · 第 11 / 20 段