IX.

As my apprenticeship advanced I grew more and more to the inhabitants of

our city into two kinds, the who were served, and the inefficient, who

were separate efficient, neglected; but the mental process of which the

classification was the result was not so deliberate as may be supposed.

Sometimes, when an important client would get into trouble, the affair

took me into the police court, where I saw the riff-raff of the city

penned up, waiting to have justice doled out to them: weary women who had

spent the night in cells, indifferent now as to the front they presented

to the world, the finery rued that they had tended so carefully to catch

the eyes of men on the darkened streets; brazen young girls, who blazed

forth defiance to all order; derelict men, sodden and hopeless, with

scrubby beards; shifty looking burglars and pickpockets. All these I

beheld, at first with twinges of pity, later to mass them with the ugly

and inevitable with whom society had to deal somehow. Lawyers, after all,

must be practical men. I came to know the justices of these police

courts, as well as other judges. And underlying my acquaintance with all

of them was the knowledge--though not on the threshold of my

consciousness--that they depended for their living, every man of them,

those who were appointed and those who were elected, upon a political

organization which derived its sustenance from the element whence came

our clients. Thus by degrees the sense of belonging to a special

priesthood had grown on me.

I recall an experience with that same Mr. Nathan. Weill, the wholesale

grocer of whose commerce with the City Hall my Cousin Robert Breck had so

bitterly complained. Late one afternoon Mr. Weill's carriage ran over a

child on its way up-town through one of the poorer districts. The

parents, naturally, were frantic, and the coachman was arrested. This was

late in the afternoon, and I was alone in the office when the telephone

rang. Hurrying to the police station, I found Mr. Weill in a state of

excitement and abject fear, for an ugly crowd had gathered outside.

"Could not Mr. Watling or Mr. Fowndes come?" demanded the grocer.

With an inner contempt for the layman's state of mind on such occasions I

assured him of my competency to handle the case. He was impressed, I

think, by the sergeant's deference, who knew what it meant to have such

an office as ours interfere with the affair. I called up the prosecuting

attorney, who sent to Monahan's saloon, close by, and procured a release

for the coachman on his own recognizance, one of many signed in blank and

left there by the justice for privileged cases. The coachman was hustled

out by a back door, and the crowd dispersed.

The next morning, while a score or more of delinquents sat in the anxious

seats, Justice Garry recognized me and gave me precedence. And Mr. Weill,

with a sigh of relief, paid his fine.

"Mr. Paret, is it?" he asked, as we stood together for a moment on the

sidewalk outside the court. "You have managed this well. I will

remember."

He was sued, of course. When he came to the office he insisted on

discussing the case with Mr. Watling, who sent for me.

"That is a bright young man," Mr. Weill declared, shaking my hand. "He

will get on."

"Some day," said Mr. Watling, "he may save you a lot of money, Weill."

"When my friend Mr. Watling is United States Senator,--eh?"

Mr. Watling laughed. "Before that, I hope. I advise you to compromise

this suit, Weill," he added. "How would a thousand dollars strike you?

I've had Paret look up the case, and he tells me the little girl has had

to have an operation."

"A thousand dollars!" cried the grocer. "What right have these people to

let their children play on the streets? It's an outrage."

"Where else have the children to play?" Mr. Watling touched his arm.

"Weill," he said gently, "suppose it had been your little girl?" The

grocer pulled out his handkerchief and mopped his bald forehead. But he

rallied a little.

"You fight these damage cases for the street railroads all through the

courts."

"Yes," Mr. Watling agreed, "but there a principle is involved. If the

railroads once got into the way of paying damages for every careless

employee, they would soon be bankrupt through blackmail. But here you

have a child whose father is a poor janitor and can't afford sickness.

And your coachman, I imagine, will be more particular in the future."

In the end Mr. Weill made out a cheque and departed in a good humour,

convinced that he was well out of the matter. Here was one of many

instances I could cite of Mr. Watling's tenderness of heart. I felt,

moreover, as if he had done me a personal favour, since it was I who had

recommended the compromise. For I had been to the hospital and had seen

the child on the cot,--a dark little thing, lying still in her pain, with

the bewildered look of a wounded animal....

Not long after this incident of Mr. Weill's damage suit I obtained a more

or less definite promotion by the departure of Larry Weed. He had

suddenly developed a weakness of the lungs. Mr. Watling got him a place

in Denver, and paid his expenses west.

The first six or seven years I spent in the office of Wading, Fowndes and

Ripon were of importance to my future career, but there is little to

relate of them. I was absorbed not only in learning law, but in acquiring

that esoteric knowledge at which I have hinted--not to be had from my

seniors and which I was convinced was indispensable to a successful and

lucrative practice. My former comparison of the organization of our city

to a picture puzzle wherein the dominating figures become visible only

after long study is rather inadequate. A better analogy would be the

human anatomy: we lawyers, of course, were the brains; the financial and

industrial interests the body, helpless without us; the City Hall

politicians, the stomach that must continually be fed. All three, law,

politics and business, were interdependent, united by a nervous system

too complex to be developed here. In these years, though I worked hard

and often late, I still found time for convivialities, for social

gaieties, yet little by little without realizing the fact, I was losing

zest for the companionship of my former intimates. My mind was becoming

polarized by the contemplation of one object, success, and to it human

ties were unconsciously being sacrificed.

Tom Peters began to feel this, even at a time when I believed myself

still to be genuinely fond of him. Considering our respective

temperaments in youth, it is curious that he should have been the first

to fall in love and marry. One day he astonished me by announcing his

engagement to Susan Blackwood.

"That ends the liquor, Hughie," he told me, beamingly. "I promised her

I'd eliminate it."

He did eliminate it, save for mild relapses on festive occasions. A more

seemingly incongruous marriage could scarcely be imagined, and yet it was

a success from the start. From a slim, silent, self-willed girl Susan had

grown up into a tall, rather rawboned and energetic young woman. She was

what we called in those days "intellectual," and had gone in for

kindergartens, and after her marriage she turned out to be excessively

domestic; practising her theories, with entire success, upon a family

that showed a tendency to increase at an alarming rate. Tom, needless to

say, did not become intellectual. He settled down--prematurely, I

thought--into what is known as a family man, curiously content with the

income he derived from the commission business and with life in general;

and he developed a somewhat critical view of the tendencies of the

civilization by which he was surrounded. Susan held it also, but she said

less about it. In the comfortable but unpretentious house they rented on

Cedar Street we had many discussions, after the babies had been put to

bed and the door of the living-room closed, in order that our voices

might not reach the nursery. Perry Blackwood, now Tom's brother-in-law,

was often there. He, too, had lapsed into what I thought was an odd

conservatism. Old Josiah, his father, being dead, he occupied himself

mainly with looking after certain family interests, among which was the

Boyne Street car line. Among "business men" he was already getting the

reputation of being a little difficult to deal with. I was often the

subject of their banter, and presently I began to suspect that they

regarded my career and beliefs with some concern. This gave me no

uneasiness, though at limes I lost my temper. I realized their affection

for me; but privately I regarded them as lacking in ambition, in force,

in the fighting qualities necessary for achievement in this modern age.

Perhaps, unconsciously, I pitied them a little.

"How is Judah B. to-day, Hughie?" Tom would inquire. "I hear you've put

him up for the Boyne Club, now that Mr. Watling has got him out of that

libel suit."

"Carter Ives is dead," Perry would add, sarcastically, "let bygones be

bygones."

It was well known that Mr. Tallant, in the early days of his newspaper,

had blackmailed Mr. Ives out of some hundred thousand dollars. And that

this, more than any other act, stood in the way, with certain

recalcitrant gentlemen, of his highest ambition, membership in the Boyne.

"The trouble with you fellows is that you refuse to deal with conditions

as you find them," I retorted. "We didn't make them, and we can't change

them. Tallant's a factor in the business life of this city, and he has to

be counted with."

Tom would shake his head exasperatingly.

"Why don't you get after Ralph?" I demanded. "He doesn't antagonize

Tallant, either."

"Ralph's hopeless," said Tom. "He was born a pirate, you weren't, Hughie.

We think there's a chance for his salvation, don't we, Perry?"

A Far Country — Volume 1 · 第 22 / 26 题