the academical life, we shall then feel ourselves prompted to say a few
words upon the tendency of certain institutions of the German
universities; on the scientific and moral spirit which prevails amongst
the students. We shall further proceed a little to explain some
singular-seeming customs and, practices, and, so far as these are
concerned, as we always speak particularly of Heidelberg, to cast some
glances of comparison upon other German and foreign universities. In
such a parallel it is also interesting to observe how the universities,
as institutions of education, operate thus essentially on the political
relations of states, and on the other hand, how they are determined in
their developement by these. These proposed points are difficult; and
their thorough discussion would lead us too far. We must therefore
content ourselves with distinctive indications.
Justly says Thiersch--"The universities are a vastly intertwined and
entangled whole, at which people and ages have laboured, in order to
bring it to its present extension."
The first and only true object of the academician is, and for ever
remains, the study of science. This constitutes the central point,
which all intently seek, and where all find themselves, without regard
to external circumstances. Knowledge, and the strife after it, are
sacred to the student; and these are the anchor, which, dropped into
the heart of every one, has lashed to it that internal spiritual bond
which embraces the whole class. The single aim of the academician is
the free pursuit of knowledge.
It is true that the majority of those who seek the university, have the
object, at a later period, of entering on state offices; and the
acquisition of knowledge made at the university, places them in a
condition to be able properly to discharge the duties of those offices,
which are the means of their future existence. But the later practical
application of this knowledge, which is so far the medium of his
profession, comes before the eye of the student in the background. In
the society of young people who are in the pursuit of knowledge, in the
intercourse with teachers whose object is the diffusion of the same,
and surrounded by external institutions which all bear upon the
advancement and the facilitation of study, he remains far from the
thought that knowledge is to be regarded as a milch-cow, which will
furnish him hereafter with butter. The unfolding of his intellectual
capacity in every direction; the following out one or the other in
particular, appears to him the business of life in these years. It is
exactly this which essentially distinguishes the corporation of
students above every thing else;--of which the student is so proud. He
despises the Philistine, who, in all circumstances of his life, is only
thinking of his petty gains.
It is grounded psychologically on this feeling of individual worth as a
disciple of wisdom, that the Burschen honour springs up, and holds
every student equally high and equally dear. As a corporation, one
stands for all, and all for one; and without drawing a moral death upon
it, this honour cannot suffer itself to be wounded. Study is pursued at
the German universities with zeal and radicality. Proofs of this, are
the great numbers of young men who every year pass through the
State's-examinations, and testify their ability in all the offices of
their country: proofs are, the writers of Germany, who owe their
accomplishment to these institutions: proofs, finally, are, the
preponderating number of well-educated men compared with those of other
countries, who draw their support from the academical foundations. But
we must not go so far. Let any one compare the German student, whose
acquirements are weighed by a competent judge, with the student of any
foreign university.
Manifold indeed have been the complaints of the laziness of the first
period of the academical life; and we can only repeat what we have said
on this subject in an earlier portion of our volume. There is an abrupt
transition from the studies of the Gymnasium to those of the
University; and the newling at the university wastes and wears away
much time, especially in the first months, and indeed during the whole
first semester, before he has accustomed himself to the free condition,
and the free and fresh atmosphere of the university. But is this of
such mighty importance? It is the transition into a state of greater
self-dependence which demands this sacrifice; and he only who has no
conception of the strengthening and fortifying influence of university
life,--he who does not perceive with what higher advantage this
material loss is counterbalanced, can alone break out into lamentations
on this head. He who is accustomed to chase youth out of one pen into
another, and to begrudge every free breath, every lighter moment, every
refreshment of over-passing Muse--who trembles and shakes lest by such
trivial circumstances they should have lost both body and soul; will
indeed judge otherwise, but deserves, in fact, to be sent back into the
school of literary and pedagogic necessity, out of which he was
expelled by some mischance. That portion of the youth however,
who have arrived on the threshold of the university honest and
well-disposed--and this portion is so predominant that the remainder
appears in comparison insignificant--this large and elect portion of
the better endowed, soon pass through the first rude shock of
difficulty and surprise, and through the mere pleasure-rambling in the
garden of the Muses. The student zealously busied to develope his
intellectual constitution, healthily and in all its members, will find
himself in the strongest manner supported by the regulations of the
German university; and of these we will speak anon.
On the other hand, the free intercourse with his cotemporaries operates
most favourably. When the youth enters the university, he steps at once
into a corporation composed of the most opposite materials. Every
student brings with him the peculiarities of his Fatherland, in manners
and speech; and how manifold is the variety! To say nothing of the
foreigners who frequent our different universities, what a difference
is there yet between the different races which speak the German tongue.
What gradations from the cold, ceremonial North German, who clings fast
to etiquette, and with difficulty attaches himself to others, to the
good-natured South German, who, knowing little of outward forms,
readily finds a friend to whom he can ally himself. Every foreigner
retains the characteristics of his own land, and often takes a pride in
exhibiting them, by which means he becomes a person detached from the
mass. We find the strongest antagonisms of this kind; and it might make
one doubtful of the reciprocating influence of this cause, had we not
found by experience that the result was a favourable one. The
intellectual bond of knowledge here embraces the sons of all nations;
and thus these apparently heterogeneous elements can only operate
auspiciously, since the advantage is not to be overlooked which the
close and mutual contact affords, of learning to know foreign manners
and customs, and for each to recognise his own in the true light.
And here we must again call attention to the fact, of the essential
difference between the result of academical life, and that of burger
life. As to the moral side of the question, there have not been wanting
people who have laboured to represent the university as a gulf which
swallows up the flower of the youth, as a pool out of which only a few
are happy enough to escape without ruin of soul and body. These are
ridiculous and malicious exaggerations. No one will attempt to deny the
dangers of university life, the temptations to deviations from
propriety; and according to time and situation must every university,
in a greater or less degree, be exposed to these; but every one who is
not blinded by excess of prejudice or enmity, knows that, besides those
who give way to temptation, by far the greater number return to their
friends from the High-school, as sound in body and mind as they came to
it.
The hope would be idle, to chase evil quite away; such a hope is
opposed to the total experience of all people and times, to the nature
of advancing manhood, and to that degree of freedom, which must be
allowed to youth in the years of its growing developement for the
prosperous completion of this developement itself, and which every
where, though it may be under different forms, will be afforded. There
is no law, no precaution, which can possibly preserve the youngling on
the higher steps of his career if he does not watch over himself; and
one cannot forget the just observation of the old English vicar, that
the virtue that needs continual watching, is not worth the cost of a
sentinel. But this is the common lot of all manly youth; and we may
boldly assert, that aberrations amongst the other classes--amongst the
younger ranks of the military, of the mercantile, and of other
departments of trade, are not less, but probably more extensive; yes,
it is satisfactory to know that in these respects the academical life
is in a progressive state of steady improvement.
But if we inquire further what are those things which most particularly
strike the foreigner in the student; those things which are most
ridiculous, and disapproved; we find that, briefly, they are the
following,--the singular dress of the student, the strong smoking, and
his habits of beer-drinking and duelling.
That the student in early times, more than at present, adopted a
singular costume, arose from two causes, either out of convenience or
vanity. In both cases, the matter is a very innocent one, and the
academical boards did wisely to permit him these fancies, so far as
they were not the signs of an interdicted verbindung. The life at the
university, as we have had now abundant occasion to observe, is a
peculiar one. When this extends itself so far that a separate court of
justice is allowed to the students, is it at all to be wondered at,
that the Student who feels himself in every respect so distinct from
the Philistine, should also seek to express this distinction by his
costume? He only does this so long as he belongs to the High-school,
and with the conclusion of this period, ceases also naturally, the
occasion for this peculiarity. Considerations of _convenance_ weigh
little with the students amongst themselves,--they weigh little with
them towards those who surround them, as it is by no means an object of
the student to seek advantage from those moving around him, nor to
render himself particularly acceptable to them. Therefore in small
cities these peculiarities of dress, chosen according to every
individual fancy, strike the eye more; while in larger cities the
student, playing a more subordinate part, unites himself more to the
general mass of society, and loses himself more in family circles.
There he will surrender himself to the existing order and convenances
of society, since, so soon as he enters the salon, he conducts himself
strictly by the rules of etiquette. But he is no slave of fashion. This
is repugnant to his freedom of thought; and he believes himself to have
as good a right to choose his own dress, as the lawgiver of fashion has
from the capital of France to prescribe what shall be held good ton in
external appearance. He is by no means so tyrannical as that personage,
since he desires from no comrade that he shall herein follow his
example; since he leaves, herein to every one perfect freedom, and
allows the native student to observe the stricter ceremonial of his
father-city.
And is his, really as it often is a most fantastic costume, more
singular or more contrary to nature, than the fashionable attire in
which many show themselves in the capitals of the whole world, and
above all, in which they present themselves to the eyes of the public
in the fashionable watering-places? Is he indeed the only one who
herein overleaps the bounds of etiquette? They who have seen the
grotesque paraphernalia in which the foreigners from beyond the Channel
suffer themselves to appear in Germany, will certainly not assert this.
And these do this in a foreign country; the student only in his German
Fatherland. Are there so many sects too, who distinguish themselves by
their peculiar dress, and shall this be so sharply objected to in the
student?
The smoking of tobacco is an accusation which the student shares in
common with the other classes of the community, and which only looks
the more striking in him. We will not defend this practice, on which so
much has already been said, nor that of beer-drinking; but we must
again take leave to observe, that in all this there is no compulsion.
The reader has probably alarmed himself by perusing the Beer-code,
which we have given at the end of this volume. It is well known that in
older times much more was drunken at the university, and that this
pernicious custom, especially in some of the German universities,
prevailed to a most lamentable degree. In those times many of these
beer-laws might be of great advantage, insomuch that they restrained
from greater excesses. As they now exist, no student is subjected to
them, who does not voluntarily submit himself to them, by associating
himself with the companies that assemble at the kneip. And even here it
is at his perfect option, at any moment, to declare that he will drink
no more, only he cannot break this declaration without paying the
penalty.
We are as little disposed to defend the duel. A reconciliation of
disputes between contenders, by the exertion of and through the means
of reason, either in the disputants themselves, or through their
friends; or if this were found impracticable, through the establishment
of a court of honour amongst the students, or through an appeal, in
serious cases, to the academical court, would certainly be a more
civilized proceeding. We may, indeed, hope that this will be
accomplished in time, and the more so, because the number of duels at
the universities, compared with former times, is already so much
diminished, and as the voices of many students are now raised against
this practice. Yet we must not judge the students too hardly on account
of the duel, but ought to take into the account the following
considerations in mitigation of our opinion.
No one is compelled to fight, who in the commencement declares that it
is contrary to his principles. Let it be recollected, that in the
university cities, more than elsewhere, young people are crowded
together, and compelled briskly to push and jostle each other, as it
were, in their course. Let it be remembered, that though we may
pronounce of the bulk of them, that they are well-educated youths, yet
at the same time, in comparison with the circumstances of other young
people, it is undeniable that far more frequent and greater occasions
for antagonist attrition occur amongst them--in part, no doubt, on
account of the greater pecuniary means in their possession, and still
more on account of the unavoidable necessity of social life amongst
themselves, especially in the lesser university cities, in which they
cannot mingle with the family circles.
The foreign universities, where the duel does not exist, cannot be
brought in evidence on this head, because they want other peculiarities
of the German universities, which are of apparently great advantage.
The constitution of the English universities, in particular, is totally
different to ours, and more resembles that of our seminaries, where the
students enjoy no such freedom. It must also be remembered that the
regulations of our universities make them accessible to those without
property, and who spring out of the lower classes, while in England
only the rich young men, and those out of the higher classes of
society, can possibly exist, with a few exceptions, at the great
universities of England. The advantage of the German universities in
this respect no one can deny, if he only turns his regard on the great
number of the most distinguished of the learned men of Germany, whose
talents have, through this very accessibility of the universities, been
made beneficial to the public.
On the other hand, one cannot expect from the student who has sprung
from one of the lower grades of society, the same degree of refinement
as graces those of a higher stand. Thus, no wonder, if through these
who have been accustomed to move in a ruder sphere of society,
occasions for contentions are more readily created. It must be
remembered that the student, be he who he may, regards himself on an
equality with his fellow-student; but on that account so much the more
jealously watches over his own honour, and on that account also
more readily believes himself insulted. Hence the customary formula
of a challenge, "Stupid youth!" which inevitably draws a duel after it,
is characteristic, as it clearly indicates that the feeling of
burschen-honour is grounded on the dedication to knowledge, whose
disciples can naturally in no way be so insulted as by the epithet
"stupid," which implies that he is totally unfit for a priest of
Minerva.
Let these facile occasions of strife be borne in mind, and then let
persons of practical experience be asked how many young people of other
grades are wounded and even killed in scuffles and cudgellings, they
will then be induced to judge more leniently of the duel amongst
students, and rather pardon the extremes of a feeling of honour, than
that the chance should possibly arise of a provoked student becoming in
effect the homicide of his fellows.
Thus we may regard the duel, under its regular form, as a sort of
discipline which the students exercise amongst themselves, and thus
banish every ruder and not seldom dangerous explosion of passion. We
say the duel in its regular form, and thereupon recall to the reader's
memory the following particulars. According to the regulations for the
arrangement of duels in Heidelberg, every challenge must be withdrawn
when the opponent declares that he gave the insult in a state of
intoxication. Every duel shall, before it is undertaken, be made known
to the Senior-Convention, and by it an accommodation shall be
attempted.
When these regulations are violated, this does not arise from the
regulations themselves, but from the partisans who have neglected to
demand from the seniors the execution of their own laws. The completion
of the duel, according to the Comment regulations, by sword stroke and
not by lunging, and with defensive costume, which covers almost every
exposed part of the body, renders any dangerous consequences almost
impossible. There is no instance, from time immemorial, of any such
regularly and formally completed duel in Heidelberg, being attended
with fatal consequences, or one which rendered life thereafter a
burden, as is only too frequently the case at universities where the
duel in _every_ form is punished more severely than as a breach of
discipline, and where, on that account, more dangerous but more easily
concealed weapons are resorted to.
By these observations we would by no means defend duels, but merely, in
some degree, excuse them. Laws against such customs, which are fast
rooted in old prejudices, are seldom very effectual. As little as the
fist-law could by power and at once be extirpated, so little, according
to our opinion, can this be accomplished with the duel. It is true that
there lies in the hands of the German governments, by means of the
State's-examination, a power of punishing and suppressing this practice
which foreign realms do not possess. They might, it may be said, pass a
law, that whoever had been engaged in a duel, should forfeit his right
to the State's-examination, and thereby state service. But it must be
answered, that this would be in the highest degree severe for a small
offence, which in itself the regular duel really is; thus, to punish a
young man in such a manner that this one folly should put an end
irrevocably to the whole of his life's prospects and career. Further,
it has been seen, that exactly at those times when the duel of every
kind was the most strictly interdicted and repressed, the most
dangerous duels by lunge and shots became more than ever frequent. And
yet these draw a punishment after them which has often made a young man
miserable for the remainder of his life. So long as it is not the
general opinion amongst the students, that the duel cannot be held as
satisfaction, so long will they, in case of actual insult, not be
deterred by the most stringent punishments from resorting to it. Till
then, would it not be the most reasonable course to visit the most
dangerous kinds of duelling with the most severe punishments of the
law, but to pursue the ordinary and less dangerous not so harshly? If
this alone remains to the student, he will by degrees convince himself
of the ridiculousness of such a sham-fighting, and the duel will, as it
is already become less piquant, cease altogether. It will be the duty
of the teacher to promulgate better views upon the nature of duelling
by speech and by writing, and thus to conduct their pupils out of the
spirit of it. This the greater number of them have even taken suitable
opportunities of doing. As an example we quote a part of the speech
which the Obermedizinalrath and Professor Dr. J. N. Ringseis delivered
on the 3d of December, 1828, in the hall of the High-school at Munich,
at a time when the duel there had become exceedingly predominant and
reckless.
"It is a sign of a noble mind to regard true honour as the highest
good, as higher than life itself. He only who does not fear death,
really possesses life. We will all strive after higher honour; and
every one of us must be prepared at any hour to sacrifice our life for
it. It is a duty through noble manners to honour ourselves; he only who
maintains a nobility of conduct himself, can respect the manners of
another. It is honourable to belong to a brave union; more mightily
works the spirit of every one in union. It is honourable to love your
native place, be it on the Isar, the Danube, the Rhine, or the Main,
since what German territory has not a host of glorious recollections?
It is an honourable, proud feeling to be able to wield the sword
skilfully, as if it were a member of our body. But he who honours
himself, his society, his native home, honours this feeling in another;
he who recognises the sacred destiny of the sword to be the protection
of the highest good of mankind, dishonours it not by unholy aims. The
officers of our army covered themselves with evergreen laurel,--how
rare is the duel amongst them! The hero youth of the universities of
North Germany performed miracles of bravery in the memorable Liberation
war; and the duel was, amongst those who returned, almost without
example. Rare indeed is it in the circles of the highest society; to
the noblest nations of antiquity, the Greeks and Romans, it was wholly
unknown.
"I repeat not the thousand-times-reiterated arguments against the
irrationality of the duel, since I know well that they have fought,
even excellent men, although convinced of the perversion of the
practice--have fought, bowing to the lordship of opinion, spite of the
certainty of losing office, property, freedom, and life itself. Truly
there belonged to such conduct a kind of obstinate bravery; but
greater, nobler, more worthy of the sight of heaven is the courage
which tames itself; the courage of him, who although fearless, although
practical in arms, although secure from discovery and punishment, yet
fights not; the hero-courage of a free obedience, which our poet
sings:--
Courage has the Mameluke--obedience in the Christian law.
"How is it, friends, that we feel ourselves too effeminate to contend
for this loftiest laurel of courage and obedience? Certainly the
nobler, the more honourable, in every accomplishment the more advanced,
a man, a union, a people,--there for ever is and was the more rarely to
be found the duel. What, then, must be thought of men to whom the duel
is become a chief business of life? of youths called hereafter to
become the leaders and the lights of your people? How, ye jurists! ye
who hereafter will nicely weigh in the balance the right--will sharply
reprove insolent opposition to the law--and would rather suffer shame
and death than perpetrate the smallest injustice,--will you open the
way through audacious contempt of the laws?
"Medical men! called to wound that they may heal, not to destroy, will
you commit that double crime against the state?
"And could a philosopher--a theologist, so grossly deride the Divine
Teacher's word--'Do good to those who hate you; bless those who curse
you; pray for those who despitefully use you?'
"And, noble friends! can true honour prevail, where drinking,
quarrelling, and insult give the shameful occasions for the duel? True
honour! where he who refuses to fight a duel is exposed in rude verses
in public places, and is even maltreated with vulgar violence? True
honour! where in aggravation of disobedience, dishonourable lies are
also added? I glow with shame to the very depths of my mind, that any
amongst us, however few in number, could be so mean as to deny the
deed, could harden themselves shamelessly to make the denial a point of
honour! Oh! hideous spectre of honour, without the courage of truth and
of obedience! The courage of truth and obedience is the highest honour;
and he who binds himself to a union pledged to lies and to
disobedience, he has from the beginning no conception of honour; unfit
for a priest, unfit for a judge, unfit for a physician!
"O my friends, I see you burn with a noble indignation; you are all on
fire for honour, for the highest honour of manhood. Up then! there is a
vast, a boundless field of laurels for you, for us all, to contend for.
Shame to ignorance! shame to immorality! shame to the rude might of
arms, without knowledge, without morals, without obedience! shame to
obedience towards unions in things which God and the king forbid! In
knowledge, in morals, in obedience, in glowing love to King and
Fatherland--in them let every individual endeavour to outstrip another,
every union the other, our university all others. I call you, my
friends, to such a noble contest; and to it call you your honour, the
fame of our university, the fame of the Fatherland, and of our King!"
These abuses, which we have just now alluded to, that is, the passion
for the duel, and the strong drinking, are the causes which make the
Verbindungs, which are known under the name of Landsmannschafts and
Chores, odious. In fact, if one puts these dark adjuncts out of mind,
then the student life, and in particular the Chore life, has only a
cheerful aspect. The close incorporation of students into unions, which
have regular meetings in some particular place, from which every
uninvited disturber of order is banished; meetings for social
entertainment and exhilaration; for practice in bodily exercises, as in
fencing and gymnastics; these could only serve to a more speedy
accomplishment of active and intellectual men, and would be certainly
approved of by all reasonable persons. These dark adjuncts have brought
the Chore life into great unpopularity, and have induced many
governments to prohibit the Chores themselves, as the vehicles which
contain and maintain these pernicious practices. Yet it must be
remembered that practices so deeply rooted are not to be expelled by
force, but only through the advancing march of humane knowledge; and it
must be further acknowledged, that the Chores by the maintainance of
order in these things themselves, only prevent a greater outburst of
the wild Burschen-spirit. The governments have made use of the Chores
frequently in order to bring the student youth to a quicker adoption of
resolutions which would be for the good of the university, or of the
state; and this continues to be the case in those states where they are
yet allowed.
Let us imagine the Chores purified from their dross; they would then
represent unions which had their own constitutions, and where those in
reality who distinguished themselves most in outer life, would take the
first places. Let it not be believed that in such a case the proper
acknowledgment would be denied to him who, unincumbered with social
life, devoted himself exclusively to knowledge. This happens by no
means to those who belong to the present Chores under their present
circumstances. That the student jealously watches over his honour; that
he easily imagines this honour affected, grounds itself on the equal
standing which he gives to every one of his fellow-members. He makes
this sufficiently obvious himself, in that he will not permit the usual
duel between the Student and the Philistine. We cannot blame this
strict vigilance over the Burschen honour; but the means resorted to,
to restore wounded honour, are truly foolish, and worthy of punishment.
If we imagine the duel superseded by the sentence of a court of honour,
which condemned the guilty to beg pardon, or some other proportionate
punishment, there would be nothing further to be desired.
But the reasons which the government assigned for the proscription of
the Burschenschaft were totally different. They were determined to
this prohibition by this principle; that the student who is at the
High-school in order further to develope his intellectual faculties,
and to arrive at a scientific and political freedom in his views--that
he, the scholar, is not called to step forth here already as a teacher
of the people; that he is not called upon to overturn the constitutions
of states, before he has yet learned properly to analyse their nice and
elaborate construction; since it is a true assertion, that it is much
more easy to pull down than to build up; and it was a piece of
presumption in the youth to attempt to hurl down by violence a fabric,
which the best and wisest of the people had with their best strength
erected.
In Heidelberg, since the Marching-Forth of 1828, the Burschenschaft, as
its especial promoter, was anew strictly proscribed, but the
Landsmannschafts were sanctioned; and from each new-springing
Verbindung the word of honour was taken, by the academical board, that
it was no Burschenschaft. After some years, however, these
Landsmannschafts were forbidden also.
So far as the Burschenschaft was a union which, on account of its ideal
object, claimed prerogatives beyond the other Verbindungs, in so far by
that prohibition is its return to the High-school made impossible. But
so far as the Burschenschaft spirit is a real constitutional spirit, we
may in Heidelberg assert with pride, that it never was abandoned by the
young burgers of our High-school, and that all our present existing
Verbindungs are animated by this same noble feeling. This
constitutional mind has already displayed itself prominently on so many
occasions, that it is not necessary to bring evidences of it. We may
simply allude in confirmation, to the interest which the students have
always manifested in the proceedings of the Landtag, and to the
testimonies of acknowledgment which they have always given to those
teachers who have there exerted themselves for the good of the people,
and for the maintenance of constitutional freedom. We may notice the
sympathy with the unhappy state of Poland, which the students publicly,
by word and deed, expressed to the Polish officers who passed through
the city. Hence, because these unions do not assume as their object the
preparation for the realization of some certain idea, but merely a
pleasant social life during the university years, it does not follow
that the hearts of these young do not beat warmly for knowledge, for
right and freedom, and that no individual amongst them pursues this
noble aim, nor does it follow that these unions set themselves in
opposition to such more ideal aims as may already be begun there to be
pursued.
An esteemed German philologist says--"Most of our German universities
bear the humane character of fine manners and chivalric bearing. They
array themselves in the clear, radiating colours of the dreams of
youthful pleasure; and is there conspicuous, indeed, in the academic
life itself, the foam of a bubbling fermentation, this clears itself
with time, and becomes in the end a noble and strong spirit." A finer
panegyric we cannot pronounce; but we may corroborate it, when we add
to the observations already made, how much the spirit of the young man
is stimulated at the university to activity; and with what noble
energy, which so eminently distinguishes the student class, he employs
this activity in all directions. As there is no rule without its
exception, so there is, indeed, such here; but we must not lay the
measuring-wand of a general judgment on these few extravagances, though
in the full elucidation of the subject we may not pass them entirely
without observation.
Abroad, people have had such singular notions of the German students,
that they could not for their lives conceive what could be made, in
after-life, of such wild fellows; and have been amazingly astonished to
hear, that they afterwards became like other reasonable people, and
administered all sorts of offices of the state conscientiously, and
with the most exemplary and calm discretion. We recollect a passage in
the humorous work of Mr. Hood, "Up the Rhine;" at which certainly many
a German student has already heartily laughed, as he has read it there
as something new--that "it is notorious that these Burschen come in,
according to the proverb, as Lions and go out as Lambs,--some of the
wildest of them settling down in life as very civil civilians, sedate
burgomasters, and the like."
Let it never be forgotten that the students represent a peculiar class,
of which they who compose it, however, are but temporary members. Shall
the student then carry over with him into the Philisterium, his
singular attire, and his Chore-colours? It would seem as if foreigners
had quite supposed this must be so. But we would ask them whether it
ever occurs that a member of parliament makes a speech in his place in
the House, arrayed in the student-gown which he wore at Cambridge?
Shall the student, indeed, carry with him his sword, that with
eccentric courage he may defend the Burschen honour, when he has
himself long become a Philistine? Shall the quondam student forsake
wife and children, in order to go and vindicate the injured majesty of
studentdom, in order to join himself to the Marching-Forth? Could such
things be, then must the German academies truly be regarded as so many
great lunatic asylums, and nothing better or wiser could be done than
to extirpate them, root and branch.
A few words yet remain to be said on the actual advantage derived by
the German student from this life, and carried forward with him out of
the green Burschendom, into the seriousness of his later vocation, and
on what his after-vocation may be.
The great business of the student, as already stated, is the pursuit of
science; and it is less the mass of knowledge here harvested, which
brings him future advantage, than the capacity which he acquires, let
him move in later life in what circle he may, of comprehending and
acting in a pure scientific and philosophical spirit, upon every matter
which may be thrown into his path. The student-life has many favourable
influences on the character of a young man. Though the Bursch, as it
regards his social position, naturally allies himself most closely to
his landsmen, yet he feels himself compelled by those causes already
pointed out, to exert a general tolerance towards his brethren, which
though often abandoned and again submitted to, yet inoculates him with
a greater degree of sufferance, which on his departure from the
academical, for a more general life, unfolds itself more freely, and
extends itself to all social relations. The student, indeed, as such,
knows little tolerance towards non-students; yet the patience which he
learns to exert towards his fellow-students, is not without its
consequence, and when he steps out of his confined sphere, it then
clothes itself in another outward form, and takes a general direction.
The student maintains strictly and perseveringly his own views, though
consequently, often erroneous ones; but this serves in after-life, to
lay the ground-work of greater steadfastness of character. This
firmness continues with him to his grave, though his views and
principles modify and purify themselves, as his growing intelligence
directs him more and more into the track of truth. And as the student
stands upon his honour, for which full of the highest enthusiasm he
glows, and joyfully offers up property and life, so stands he in the
bonds of truth and friendship. Such bond of friendship is to him sacred
as his own life, and it is to him continually a guiding-star through
the gloomy paths of existence. It is to him the noblest treasure which
he carries with him into the tumult of life, and he continues to it
inviolably faithful.
In addition to this, the student has learned to arrive at the poetical
side of life. He has continually sought and enjoyed pleasure and
satisfaction; and let no man imagine that these foretell only a
future trifler. No, he is thereby invited to enliven the stupidity of
every-day life, and to throw new interests around the path of
existence. That, however, every character, according to its own
individuality, more or less favourably developes itself, and that these
influences of student-life here described differ in degree in different
individuals, needs no stating. We seek only to show general causes, and
these are certain. Scientific merit, self-confidence, consciousness of
being able to thank his own individual strength for his existence, the
honour of men, and the truth of friends,--can more beautiful or
delightful results than these be found? Even on the outward appearance
of the quondam Bursch, the student-life has a favourable influence. The
moment that the young man has entered the Philisterium he adopts the
existing convenances, so far as appear conducive to his purpose, but
only so far as that he can yet maintain that independence of fashion
which he has already asserted. His outward manner of life continues
free and unrestrained; and this, united to the practice of making a
greater tour after his examination has passed, as well with scientific
as with other objects, gives to the former academician a higher
bearing, an acquired tact, which adheres to him through existence, and
again pronounce in their consequences the greatest advantages of
student-life.
That the Burschen-life, through the greater freedom which it enjoys,
may also bring great disadvantages to him who has abused it, and which
may poison later life; who will attempt to deny? We have already
pointed out the rocks and breakers of this ocean of transition life.
The Burschenschaft agitations of a former period also plunged many into
misfortune; but this danger is now in a great measure past, and for the
last time gleamed up a political tendency for a few moments in the
Verbindung, like glimmering ignis-fatui, in the years 1830-32.
When the student now quits the university, where he has left behind him
the follies of youth, and bearing with him a greater or less amount of
intellectual acquisition, he enters immediately on the service of the
state. After his State's-examination it is very customary to make a
tour, before the young man for ever knits himself to one abode. Besides
those who in practical state's-service, or as teachers in the schools
and universities, work themselves forward, step by step, with more or
less speed, according to the degree of their ability and of their
diligence, or in proportion as they are favoured by fortune,--others
exert themselves in the wide field of daily literature, zealously
labouring to win the fame of authors and of poets. But follow whichever
path he may, let fortune smile on him or not--let him crown himself
with laurels, or strive for the wreath of glory in vain--never will he
who has been a genuine Bursch, become a Philistine; that is, in that
sense in which the student understands it. The words of the celebrated
Arndt express most lucidly this meaning of the word Philistine. "A
Philistine is a lazy, much-speaking, more-asking, nothing-daring man;
such a one who makes the small great, and the great small, because in
the great he feels his littleness and his insignificance. Great
passions, great enjoyments, great dangers, great virtues,--all these
the Philistine styles nonsense and frenzy. He will rather have life in
the pocket edition than in the folio, so that it can but be carried
through with the very least possible acting, thinking, and daring.
Rest, and rest again, and at any rate; a state of laziness, that he
loves, that he desires, that he preaches up, and for that he cries to
heaven and earth, if there is any chance of his being disturbed in it."
Into these faults he will never fall, who has once imbibed the
principles of a German university; and will only in so far belong to
the Philistines, as the student in a wider sense terms every one a
Philistine who no longer belongs to the Burschen.
What we have now been saying may convince us how beneficial is the
influence of the student-life on that which follows. Nobler principles
of action awake in the breast of the academician, and are nourished;
that here and there starts up amongst them something perverse, is not
denied; but the kernel is good, it germinates, it grows into a tree,
and bears excellent fruit, which the quondam Bursch and his
cotemporaries are destined to enjoy.
CHAPTER XXV.
A REVIEW OF THE POLITICAL ASPECT OF STUDENT LIFE.
If we have hitherto regarded the life and pursuits of the university in
an isolated manner, and entirely on its own account, yet it can by no
means have escaped the reader that this life does not stand so
completely sundered from the general stream of events, but that the
mind and spirit of the university life is determined by the spirit of
the times, and that, on the other hand, it operates again powerfully on
the developement of the institutions and condition of the times. This
must have become sufficiently clear to us in noticing the earlier
Burschenschaft, and to increase and complete that conviction, we have
only to take a hasty review of what has been now written, and to add a
few other remarks.
The universities reflect the spirit of the times: its progress, its
weakness, its strength, are all imaged forth again in the science of
the age; and the schools are therefore exposed to the changes and
revolutions of the times, but are not unconditionally subjected to
them. They have strengthened that spirit of the time and of the people
in their exhaustion, by their inquiries and results; and not less
through teaching and the invisible power with which they have elevated
and ennobled the minds of the youth. They have enriched the sciences,
and adorned public affairs with beauty and wisdom. They have in part
laid the foundations of the intellectual greatness and high
accomplishment of Germany; in part strengthened and guaranteed them;
and are the pillars of the fairest and most unrivalled glory which our
country in the most recent times, and before the eyes of all Europe,
has achieved. The university is the central point and the heart of
science. From all sides stream to it the spirits which are athirst for
knowledge; and as they are ennobled, again from that central point
disperse themselves through all the members of Germany, diffusing
through them fresh nourishment and a splendid growth. The teachers and
accomplishers of the people go forth out of them. The battles of the
church were fought out in the university; and if, as it happened in the
contest of the Reformation, the faith of the Princess was forced upon
the High-school by the hand of power, yet the teachers and scholars of
the university seldom bowed before it. The teachers abandoned a place,
which would lay their consciences in chains, and sacrificing office and
income, sought an asylum in foreign lands. They often found a refuge in
another university which held the same faith as themselves; they
carried with them the troop of their scholars, who, as their faithful
bodyguard, attended them; and there fought anew and victoriously for
the success of the good cause.
The Professors of the High-schools have pre-eminently cooperated in
working out the constitution of the German States, and many excellent
men amongst them have contended for the freedom of the people, and have
boldly stood forward against every usurpation of despotism. We need
only give one example, and that of the most recent date; we need only
call to the reader's mind the Seven Professors of Goettengen, who
opposed themselves to the arbitrary violation of the constitution of
the state with all their power, and on that account in the most
unprincipled manner were ejected from their professorships. This
scandalous, and in Germany till then, unheard-of example of despotism,
notoriously threatened the destruction of the Georgia-Augusta, and for
a long time annihilated its prosperity; but other states, by their
reception and establishment of these professors, have shown that they
approved of their proceeding, and the exiled professors were every
where received by the German students with the testimonies of the
deepest veneration. If the Bundestag did not condemn the King of
Hanover as guilty, yet the judgments are well known, which many German
universities at its desire gave in, and in which they expressed in the
most strong and unqualified language their sense of the injustice of
the deed. We call to mind that the tyrant called on the King of
Wirtemberg to punish the audacity of the professors of Tuebingen who had
sent in such a judgment, according to the enormity of their crime,--an
audacity which in Hanover would be expiated in chains; but the noble
monarch answered that in his land the freedom of teaching was a sacred
possession, which he would never infringe; but, for the rest, he
observed sarcastically, he left it to the High Court of Justice at
Celle to pronounce sentence on the guilt or innocence of his faithful
professors.
If the universities in such a manner grapple mightily with the
circumstances of the times, so are they, on the other hand, influenced
by them. They receive from the times the impressions, the tendency, the
frivolity as well as the earnestness, and distinguish themselves only
from the other circles of society in this, that in them the good and
the evil of the times more rapidly unfold themselves and take a
determinate form. The moral effeminacy of the nation at the time of the
French domination, operated on the ignoble natures amongst the youth,
scattering and dissolving; while it spurred on the nobler to those
Verbindungs out of which, at a later period, went forth hosts to do
battle for the liberation of the nation from a foreign yoke. After the
rising of the nation and its consequence--victory over the foe,--as all
hearts felt themselves elevated, all exertions felt themselves refined,
the new form of the time stood forth in the yet pure aims of the
Burschenschaft, which at the time when the Tugend-bund extended itself,
constituted, on its first appearance, a continuation of the
brotherhood-in-arms, the Waffengenossenschaft, which with the student
youth returning from the war, had this object,--to purify academical
life from its dross, and to present it as an image of the union and
ennobling of all the German races. Hereupon followed the period of
undeceiving, of counteraction, of degeneracy, which run into so
unrestrained a career, that to the wise and prudent, the beautiful time
of enthusiasm, appeared as the dream and frenzy of good-natured fools.
As the youth would not abandon the objects of their endeavours, whether
rational or chimerical, but, on the contrary, held them equally fast as
something great and noble, a portion of them fell a secure prey to the
unquiet, the revolutionists and political intriguers, who abused their
inexperience, and poisoned their noble endeavours by infusing a
resistance to public order. The teachers of the universities were
blamed by many, as though they were chargeable with being concerned in
these aberrations of the youth, or, at least, were so far culpable that
they had not prevented them.
So far as a direct participation of the teachers in these political
disturbances is concerned, we may be well assured that, if only a
single professor had at any time been an accomplice, or indeed only a
concealer and protector, of the guilty, the exact, the strict, and in
many places for years protracted inquiries, would to a certainty have
come upon the trace of their crimes, and the guilty would have been
conducted from the professorial chair to the dungeon. There remains
only the question, whether they, though taking no part in the views and
proceedings of the young people, were yet aware of them, and took no
steps to prevent them. But were the youths who fell under the power of
the law, the only ones who trod the same dangerous path? Were there not
amongst the others, some, perhaps even as many, who, through the
warnings and exhortations, or through the moral influence of
distinguished teachers; and, in short, through the better spirit which
every well conducted university developes amongst the nobler part of
the youth, were preserved from that mischief? But, so far as the
actually implicated students were concerned, the professors were in the
same case with the Boards, expressly organized for the watching over
the youth, and the matter was quite unknown to them, since the youths
who were mutually pledged to that object, concealed it from the eyes of
the professors just as scrupulously as from those of the university
Commission of inquiry, and the Boards of police. But to the liberation
of Germany from the dominion of Napoleon, the High-schools contributed
no little. Joyfully their scholars gave themselves up to death, and
scholars and teachers roused the nations to bravery through inspiriting
songs; of which the names of Arndt, Schenkendorf, Koerner, Hauff,
Follen, Voss, Stolberg, Scharnhorst, and Haupt, stand as glorious
testimonies.
Yet once more the youth wandered from their laudable endeavours in the
years 1830-33, and one portion of them although a small one, suffered
themselves to become the work-tools of political fanaticism. The
revolution in Poland, and the unhappy fate of that country, had made a
vivid impression on their minds. Demagogic agitators again were busy in
secret; private Verbindungs were formed; the catastrophe of the French
Revolution of July occurred, and flung the firebrand into the powder
magazine. People thought they must follow the example of France, and
began loudly, with writing and by speech, to attack the governments and
to abuse the princes. But the youth who attached themselves to these
agitators, were no longer the old Burschenschaft, who steadfast to
their one idea,--"One Fatherland, which should declare itself the
worthy antagonist of the arch-enemy France; one church, and freedom,"
fought out this with word and deed: no, the modern Burschenschaft, an
abused work-tool of a greater party, had sworn death to the hereditary
princes, and did not shrink, as a means of achieving such an object, to
offer the hand even to the old enemy, to France itself. They would dare
the highest extremes; and, allured by the apparent quietness of the
government, the assembly at Hambach, which has become so widely
celebrated, was held in 1833, where the French colours, and the
tri-colour of the Burschenschaft, fluttered from the same staff. There,
death to the princes was sworn, and within a short time revolutionary
movements broke out in all parts of Germany. A number of the academic
youth plunged themselves into misfortune through the attempt at
Frankfort, since the governments now found it necessary to exercise
stringent measures with all their power, and all partisans of such
demagogue Verbindungs were quickly either arrested, or, having been
timely warned, fled.
It may well be supposed that from this time forward, a much stricter
eye was kept upon every sort of Verbindung of the students. No
Landsmannschaft dare lift its head, and the academical liberty was in
many particulars restricted. Another injurious effect also became
apparent. Many states, more particularly Prussia and Russia, forbade
their subjects to frequent any but their own universities, and no
university felt the loss occasioned by this order more than Heidelberg,
where the attendance of Prussian subjects has only again been recently
permitted.
Yet, after all, only a small portion of the student youth, suffered
themselves to be carried away by these imprudences; and what might be
the reacting effect of these lamentable occurrences, the reflection of
the students on themselves and on their calling, on what became them
and was for their real advantage, further strengthened and quickened by
the seriousness with which the governments pursued the guilty, produced
in them a greater exactness, and gave thereby a higher moral firmness
to the academical life, so that far from being represented as a sink of
wickedness, as some people believe it, it may much more justly be
regarded now as a fruitful, purified, well-drained, and well-sown,
field. The channels, constructed to lay dry the boggy places, are
cleared; the unsound spots are probed and made good; and if the
watchful superintendence of circumspect and well-disposed Boards, and
the professional faithfulness of the majority of the academical
teachers continue what they are, this corn-field of our future will yet
bear continually more beautiful and affluent harvests.
CHAPTER XXVI.
A PARTING GLANCE AT OTHER UNIVERSITIES:
GERMAN AND FOREIGN.
We have in conclusion, only to say a few words of comparison between
the university of Heidelberg and the other German universities; and
between these generally and those of other countries.
In the description of a German university, we have always had that of
Heidelberg in our eye, touching only occasionally one or another of the
other German universities. The institutions of these are essentially
alike, yet each one has its own peculiarities; and this is not to be
wondered at, when one reflects how many influences determine the course
of the developement of a High-school. It shapes itself on the
circumstances of the times, according to the will of the Princes under
whose protection it stands; according to surrounding causes, in respect
to nature and art; and more than all, according to the spirit and
character of the teachers. To take a comparative review of these
peculiarities of the other universities of Germany would be highly
interesting; but when we reflect that in such a course all alleged
influences must be carefully weighed; and, in fact, that not merely the
present but all the past fortunes of the High-schools must be brought
under the eye, it will at once be seen that so wide a scope of
observation does not belong to this work. We can as little go into the
narrative of the foreign universities; because personal inspection is
wanting to us, and because we can give little faith to the statements
of foreigners--statements which often contradict each other, and for
the most part are as little worthy of credence, as those fabulous
accounts of German universities which have been circulated abroad The
last few years have brought us intelligence of the English
universities, which represents them as the nurseries of all that is
mischievous and corrupt, and which paints them in colours as repellant
as, at the same time, have been daubed over the caricatures of German
universities there. The false representations which foreigners, who, in
fact, have lived for some years at a German High-school, have made of
the diligence and moral condition of the same, warn us not to pronounce
a similar opinion on academical institutions which we have not seen
with our own eyes. We will only here devote a few lines to some
advantages which our institutions appear to us to possess over those of
England.
The great wheel of the mechanism of a German university is, next to the
payment for the lectures, the division of the teachers into ordinary
and extraordinary professors, and private teachers. Through the income
appointed by the government, the professor is not dependent on his
hearers, and is not tempted to care more for his income than for
science. The first duty of a professor is towards science; not towards
the students. That is the principle of all genuine university
professors; and in this exactly differs the university essentially from
the Gymnasium. The state must secure a moderate income to the
professor, independent of the number of his hearers; since a lecture
which has only seven or eight attendants may be of incalculable benefit
to science; as for instance, those on the higher analysis, or the
higher philology. A great mathematician ought not, in order to acquire
emolument merely, waste his time in teaching the inferior branches of
his science. But on the other hand, the state is not bound to give to
every individual a scientific education gratuitously, and to its own
ruin; and it would be unjust to extract money from the pockets of all
citizens for the benefit of only a very small number. A suitable and
secure income, which furnishes a professor with what is necessary and
with leisure; and paid lectures, which in proportion to his success
shall better his condition,--these, in this respect, constitute the
true means; since a professor should never forget the higher interests
of science, nor in the brilliant lustre of a transcendent genius
content himself with only a certain degree of success, and only a
moderate number of hearers. There is also this advantage to be added,
that the students frequent with more zeal and perseverance the lectures
for which they pay.
What happens in these respects in France is exactly the contrary. In
the French faculties of language and science, the doors are thrown
open, and every man can enter without paying. This at the first view
appears excellent, and worthy of a great nation. But what is really the
consequence? That an audience is like the pit of a theatre; one goes
in, and then goes out again, in the midst of the lecture; another comes
once, and then comes no more if the professor does not tickle his ear.
The attendants listen with distracted attention, and in general you see
more amateurs than students. The professor who does not lose a _sous_,
let him do his work as ill as possible, either neglects it, and expends
little trouble or talent on his lectures, or loving fame, anxious for
his reputation, and yet despairing to win a serious audience, labours
at least to assemble a numerous one. In this case there is an end to
science; for in order to make it attractive, he must sink himself to
the level of his hearers.
There lies in this great number of attendants an almost magnetic
influence, which bows to its yoke even the strongest minds; and he who
would be an earnest and admirable professor for attentive students,
becomes for frivolous, airy, and superficial hearers, light and
superficial himself. In fine, what remains to the multitude of that
instruction to which they have given a gratuitous attendance?--a
confused impression, just about as profitable as that which an
interesting drama in the theatre would have left behind.
But is this to be compared for a moment with the persevering zeal of
fifty or a hundred hearers even, who have paid beforehand for the
lectures; who follow their progression obstinately, in order to sift
them, and to give themselves an account of them, without which they
have thrown away both their time and money. Thus excellent is the
arrangement that the student shall pay something, and at the same time
the state shall guarantee to the distinguished and learned men who are
chosen as professors, a secure and fitting support.
The three degrees of teachers at the High-schools of Germany are in the
happiest manner divided from each other, and yet bound together. The
foundation, the root of the professorship, the inexhaustible and
everspringing nursery of the German university, are the young doctors,
to whom it is allowed, under certain conditions, and with the
permission of the faculties, to deliver public lectures. Every able
young man may thus arrive at the higher offices of teaching, but none
without raising, at least good expectations. He is tried, but without
entering into any actual engagement with him; without any thing being
promised to him, or given him. If he does not by correspondent results,
realize the hopes which have been entertained of him; if he fails to
attract hearers, and to do honour to the faculty which admitted him; it
is seen that a vain anticipation has been attached to him, and he is
not raised to the rank of extraordinary professor. He himself, after
some years, withdraws himself from the hopeless pursuit, which brings
him few hearers and little profit, and betakes himself to some other
career. On the contrary, if he fulfil the hopes raised by him; if he
gather numerous hearers, and write works which excite attention; he is
then declared Extraordinary professor, a title which is irrevocable,
and which gives him a small fixed salary, which, with the income
derived from his hearers, encourages him, and supports him in his
career. If he maintain this happy progress, if he prove himself an able
man, the state, in order to retain him, increases by degrees his
income, and finally names him Ordinary professor.
This distinguished title is never given on account of hopes: which may
be found false by experience, but on account of tried effects, of
distinguished talents, and established reputation. It is very rare that
this title is received before a certain age; and there is not a
professor in Germany, who is not a man of a reputation more or less
distinguished, since this position is entirely the reward of his
talents. Great and successful results, be they in writing or lecturing,
these in Germany nominate the Ordinary professor, and an unlimited
choice is afforded in the multitude of young teachers. Talent, with the
aid of time and perseverance, wins the prize, and that is the genuine
and proper contest. As age and time dull the zeal and diminish ability,
and the professor now grown old, neglects or does not advance with the
advances of science; an innovator in his youth, does he now become a
loiterer, what is to be done? His hearers, ever attracted by the spirit
of the time, desert his lectures; and seek those of an Extraordinary
professor, or perhaps those of a private teacher--young and zealous,
and often to excess, fond of innovation and bold inquiry; and the
university suffers not through the retreat of those, who formerly
served it faithfully and well. This happy mechanism rests on the
distinction into extraordinary and ordinary professors, and private
teachers; which in France correspond with the titulaires, adjoints, and
agreges.
Let us now only reflect how different altogether is the practice in
France. A man is put in the list of competitors for a few weeks,
amongst such young people as frequently have not written two lines;
have taught scarcely a single year; and now, after giving in some
stated proof, are often in their twenty-fifth year endowed with an
irrevocable title, which may be held till their seventieth year without
doing any thing; which, from the first day of their nomination to the
end of their life, draws the same salary, whether they have many
hearers or few; whether they distinguish themselves or not; whether
they thenceforward live in ignorance, or become celebrated men!
Another great disadvantage in France is, that in this country the
different faculties of which a German university is composed, are
separated from each other, scattered about, and in this isolation
are as it were, lost. Here are faculties of science, in which lectures
upon chemistry, physics, and natural history, are held, without a
medicinal faculty at their side, which might thence derive benefit;
there--faculties of law, and of theology, without history, literature,
and philosophy. So are there perhaps twenty miserable faculties
scattered over the whole surface of France, and nowhere a genuine home
for science. Thence comes it, that in France study is for the most part
so unphilosophically pursued; although able professional men are
accomplished in jurisprudence and medicine, the studies which are there
the most in esteem.
We leave it to the English reader, who is better acquainted with the
universities of his native land, than we are--to decide, how far the
deficiencies here attributed to the French universities also affect
those of Britain. Oxford and Cambridge, the two most ancient
universities of England, have remained true to the old institutions, to
the old mode of living altogether in colleges, which the German public
has long abandoned as not answering the purpose. They have a greater
self-dependence and independence than the German ones, which are
submitted to the superintendence of the state. Yet the German
institutions in this respect reap many advantages, so long as the
government is no despotism. Through such high-standing Boards, boards
which respect the interests and claims of all parties, and administer
to them all justice with strict impartiality, the chairs of science are
preserved from incapacity; the meritorious are made known and elevated;
obstructions are removed; help is duly administered, morals are
protected, defects are remedied, better and more effectually than can
be done by a corporation alone, and without such a well-disposed and
wise superintendence of their interests; and which places the
university in a condition to exercise a fresher and more unimpaired
strength in the great pursuit of science and of accomplishment, and
with more decisive effect; and to remain mistress of the great movement
of inquiry and of knowledge.
That the advantages of the German High-schools are, however,
acknowledged in England, is proved by the foundation of the liberal
University in London in the year 1825, wherein they have sought to
combine many of the German plans, whose value was recognised, with the
old English ones. But yet more than by this fact, is paid the tribute
of recognition of the excellence of the German High-schools, by the
great number of young men who, not alone from the European countries,
but from distant regions of the earth, hasten to place themselves at
the feet of their teachers.
No country has so many and such excellent universities as
Germany,--and the proofs of their advantages exist in the great number
of illustrious learned men and authors, which quench their thirst of
knowledge at these immortal wells of science; men, whose creations
daily more and more receive abroad their just recognition, and in no
country more than in England.
THE
GENERAL BEER-COMMENT OF HEIDELBERG.
Many a one is a more true Diogenes, not when he is in
the tub, but when the tub is in him.
TITULUS I.
DIVISION OF THE STUDENTS AS IT REGARDS THE BEER COMMENT.
Sec. 1. All Students are divided into Crass Foxes (or Fat Foxes), Brand
Foxes, and Beer-Burschen.
2. Every student, during the first course of his academical career, is
a Fat Fox.
3. He becomes a Brand-Fox when he is burnt at one of the regular kneips
of the respective Chores, with the proper solemnities; yet this shall
not occur before the Farewell Commers of his first, nor later than four
weeks after the entrance Commers of his second, semester.
4. The Brand-Fox becomes a Beer-Bursch, if he be _pawked_ in
(initiated), at the end of his second course, but after the Farewell
Commers, or at the commencement of his third course; this, however,
shall only be done in beer.
5. Comes one here who has already studied two semesters at another
known university, he must at the commencement of his third semester be
here _pawked_ in, or otherwise, till he be pawked in, he can only, as
it regards the Beer-companies, be considered as a Brander.
6. Every one who has studied three semesters at another known
university, has on that account the rights of a Beer-bursch.
7. A Fox who is the Chore-bursch of an existing verbindung or union,
has the rights of a Beer-bursch, yet must he suffer himself to be
_pawked_ in as a Beer-bursch.
8. The following is the mode of pawking in. At one of the appointed
kneips of the respective Chore, the in-pawking Beer-bursch drinks to
the in-to-be-pawked at least half a choppin of beer, after the singing
of every strophe of a song then sung, and the in-to-be-pawked must _a
tempo_ drink as much. Moreover, it is well understood that the
in-to-be-pawked pays for the beer of the in-pawker which is thus drunk.
TITULUS II.
OF THE FORE AND AFTER DRINKING.
Sec. 9. From the Foxes, whether Crass or Brand Foxes, the Beer-bursch is
not bound to take a beer challenge; yet can the Brand-fox _nachstuerzen_
(that is, command the person who is going to drink before him, to drink
twice the quantity that he proposes). Amongst themselves the Foxes have
equal rights.
10. No one must accept a challenge of less than half a choppin, or more
than four choppins at once. The graduated quantities of the Comment,
are a half, a whole, two, three, and four choppins.
11. The interval between the fore and after drinking of each
agreed-upon quantity must be no more than five minutes (that is, the
accepter must drink his quantity within five minutes after the
challenger). And every earlier challenge must be drunk before the
latter one.
12. If four choppins are agreed upon, so must the foreswearer or
challenger, drink each choppin separately within five minutes of each
other; and not till he has drunk these four choppins, must he take a
challenge from another person. Also, the challenger must have first
drunk his whole contracted quantity before his antagonist is bound to
drink his.
13. He who has a challenge of four choppins on his hands, is not bound
to take another challenge till that is drunk out.
14. If a challenge is made, and the challenged excuses himself on the
plea that he has already four choppins to drink, the challenger is
justified in obliging the challenged to show him each of those four
allege choppins as he drinks them.
15. If a challenge is given, and the challenged _nachstuerz_, the
quantity, (that is, insists that it shall be doubled,) the challenger
is obliged to drink the doubled quantity.
16. The challenged may not more than double the quantity proposed by
the challenger.
17. The _nachstuerz_ become invalid the moment the prescribed quantity
exceeds two choppins, except in a challenge _a faire_.
18. If one pauses during the drinking, leaves a Philistine in the
glass, (that is, if he leaves the bottom of the glass still covered
with beer,) it is to be considered that he has not drunken his
quantity, and he must instantly drink another in the proper manner.
19. The case is the same when an umpire declares that so much beer has
been spilt in the drinking as would cover the bottom of the glass.
20. In every quantity which is drunk in successive portions, the Secs. 18
and 19 shall apply to the party whom the umpire shall have declared to
have drunken informally.
21. As well in the fore as the after drinking, the antagonist can
select an umpire, who, if he judges that the fore or after quantity is
deficient, must see that it is made complete, and that it is properly
drunken.
22. No one is bound to accept a challenge of more than one choppin at a
time out of a vessel which will hold more; unless the two drinkers
agree differently between themselves.
TITULUS III.
OF ANSCHISS-SAUFEN; OR DEFINING OF WHAT ARE PENAL CASES IN DRINKING.
Sec. 23. Foxes, whether Crass or Brand Foxes, may neither _touche_ an
honourable Beer-bursch in beer, that is, challenge him to a beer
contest; nor, if he be challenged by an honourable Beer-bursch, may he
_nachstuerz_, or double the quantity. If one of them does this, then
must he be _verdonnert_,[50] or condemned in thunder, to pay for a
_viertel_, that is, sixteen choppins. The Foxes have also here equal
rights amongst themselves.
24. The degrees of the beer challenges are the following:--A Learned
Man stands for a half-choppin; a choppin is a Doctor; two choppins, a
Professor; three choppins, an Amtmann; four choppins, a Pope.
25. If any one has given his cerevis, that is, made an assertion on his
beer-word against another, and it cannot be proved who has given his
cerevis wrong, so must the two drink out a Learned Man--such cases,
however, excepted as are before the Beer-court.
26. No one is bound to accept _ex abrupto_ more than a _Learned Man_;
yet must the Foxes accept, _ex abrupto_ every challenged _Doctor_, from
an honourable Beer-bursch.
27. The provoker to a beer-challenge must be challenged within five
minutes. If he will double on the challenge, he must do it immediately,
and according to the fixed gradations of Sec.24.
The settling of the challenge must be completed within five minutes
after the challenge is given; and the drink-duel must be immediately
contested, if the challenged has not yet an older scandal[51] to
defend.
28. Every earlier scandal must take precedence of a later. If any one
asserts that he has yet an earlier scandal, he must name the person
with whom it depends. The antagonist has a right to name an umpire, who
must take care that the scandal is effaced in its regular order, or
otherwise the umpire must write the name of the first on the beer-table
with the penalty belonging to the offence.
29. The proceeding in fighting out a scandal is as follows:--Each
pawkant or combatant appoints a second, of whom the seconder of the
challenger, on his cerevis, makes the weapons equal. If the weapons,
however, appear unequal to the other second, he can call an umpire, who
decides whether they are equal or not. If the umpire declares that the
weapons are not equal, he who calls the umpire, has, after the scandal
is fought out, to propose the proper penalty for the second who failed
to make the weapons equal, according to Sec. 131, No. 11 (a).
30. At the place of the challenged the weapons are made equal, and the
beer-scandal is there fought out.
31. If the weapons are equal, the second of the challenged gives the
following commando, "Seize it! put to! loose!"
32. Before this commando, the drinking must not begin; and should it
begin, either of the seconds must cry halt, and the weapons must be
again made equal. But halt cannot be cried after the word "loose" is
given.
33. Both parties must drink instantly on the command being given,
whereupon the commanding second, after both have drunk, first declares
his judgment, and then the other second either admits this judgment or
not. If the latter be the case, so the seconds themselves must drink
off a Learned Man, be the quantity what it may for which they stood
seconds, except in the cases stated in Secs. 34 and 35.
34. Drinks not one of the two combatants on the given commando, the
prescribed quantity, or bleeds he, or pauses during the drinking, or
leaves a Philistine in the glass; so is he a defaulter, and must,
within five minutes, drink once more the prescribed quantity. If he do
this not, he is put under the beer-bann, and the quantity which he has
failed to drink is written on the beer-tablet against him.
35. He is equally a defaulter if he breaks his glass in setting it
down, or overturns it, except, in the last case, he can set it up again
before his antagonist is ready.
36. Every one must second the moment he is called upon to do so; yet if
one second be a Beer-bursch, he is not obliged to accept a Fox as his
opposite second. If any one refuses, without a sufficient ground of
excuse, to become a second, he is to pay the penalty of a viertel.
37. The parties concerned in a beer-scandal, must, neither with one
another, nor with others, engage in a fresh scandal, neither can others
engage them in such. But should this happen, the provoker must
immediately revoke, or be condemned to a viertel.
38. The beer-scandal arising between seconds, as in Sec. 33, is to be
fought out in manner following: The second who declared himself first,
names his umpire, before whom the scandal is to be fought out, and
through whose declaration it is to be concluded.
TITULUS IV.
OF ENGAGEMENT A FAIRE.
Sec. 39. The engagement _a faire_ is the contract between two to measure
themselves in beer drinking.
40. Those who will make an engagement _a faire_, must let this be
proclaimed clearly three times by a beer-honourable Beer-bursch;
whereupon all who are already concerned with these parties in a
beer-scandal, may state their claims, so that they may fight out their
scandals with them before this new engagement comes on.
41. Both combatants must, at least, empty one choppin in every five
minutes, or be the quantity greater they must still do the same.
42. Neither of these combatants may accept any thing from a third, nor
fore-drink to him; neither may they provoke to a fresh scandal or be
provoked to it. Those who do, fall under the penalty of a viertel.
43. They may not officiate in beer-affairs; nor be seconds, witness,
nor umpires; nor sit in the Beer-comments, nor convoke, or cause such
to be convoked; they may not aid in removing the beer-bann, or drink
with him from whom it is to be removed, otherwise they are condemned to
a viertel.
44. This Beer-strife is ended by one or the other declaring that he can
drink no more, but not by agreement to drink no more. He that yields
must quit the kneip within five minutes, or will be condemned to two
viertel. Besides this, he is regarded as under the bann for the rest of
the day; but during the five minutes that he stays, he is not obliged
to accept any fresh challenge.
45. The conclusion of the Beer-strife shall in the same manner as its
commencement, be loudly proclaimed by a beer-honourable Beer-bursch.
TITULUS V.
OF THE DECLARATION.
Sec. 46. If any one has no desire to either fore or after drink, or to
concern himself in beer-suits, he must cause this to be declared by a
beer-honourable Beer-bursch. If from the beginning he drinks no beer at
the kneip, he need not declare himself.
47. He who receives this declaration is bound to proclaim it aloud.
48. The declared may not be challenged in beer. Should this happen, the
challenger must instantly revoke, or he will be condemned in a viertel.
If the declarer challenges, he falls under the same penalty.
49. If any one has already drunken beer in the kneip, and then says,
without having declared himself, that he goes away, he must not accept
a challenge. But if he remains in the kneip five minutes after this
declaration of going away, then every one can fore-drink him; and in so
far as he does not after-drink according to the regulations, he may be
mulct.
50. Each declaration can then only be accepted, when the declarer has
drunk out all his contracted quantities, and all scandals in which he
has been engaged have been fought out.
51. He who in the commencement of a kneip declares that he is unwell,
is for the evening declared, but he cannot during that evening take
back his declaration.
52. If a declarer appears before the Beer-convention as a complainant,
he must bring two witnesses.
53. The declaration is removed:--
(1) Through fore or after drinking of any quantity, even should
the declarer use the proviso, "without prejudice to my declaration."
(2) By making a counter declaration.
(3) By the declarer mixing himself in beer-suits.
54. They mix themselves in beer-suits, who--
(1) Demand or give the cerevis.
(2) Sit in a Beer-convention; witness, call a Beer-convention, or
cause it to be called.
(3) Is an umpire, a second in a Beer-scandal, or drinks with him who
is to be released from the bann.
(4) Who challenges in beer.
(5) Who engages himself with another _a faire_.
TITULUS VI.
OF THE UMPIRES.
Sec. 55. A beer-honourable Beer-bursch only can be an umpire.
56. Every one must obey the call to be an umpire, unless he can advance
some available excuse. If, without being able to do this, he declares,
he must be mulct in a viertel.
57. If a Fox accepts the office of an umpire, he falls under the
penalty of a viertel.
58. The umpire may stand with none of the parties in a beer-scandal;
but should this be the fact, the case cannot stand over, but another
umpire must be called.
59. When an umpire is called forth, he cannot be challenged of any one:
the offender in this case is punishable with a viertel.
60. If any one holds the judgment of an umpire to be unjust, he is at
liberty to summon him before a Beer-convention; but this must be done
before the quantity which has been made equal by the umpire, is
drunken.
61. The umpire can always be called before the Beer-convention, on
account of his decisions, except when he pronounces the penalty
incurred in the act of releasing one from the bann, or upon him who
drinks with him; in which case the condemned person cannot appeal to a
General Beer-convention.
62. If the decision of the umpire is declared unjust by the
Beer-convention, he goes into Beer-banishment; but if that be not
the case his accuser is without further procedure condemned to
Beer-banishment.
TITULUS VII.
OF THE BEER-CONVENTIONS.
(_a_) OF THE SPECIAL.
Sec. 63. The Beer-convention is that competent Board which is called
by a beer-honourable Beer-bursch, in order to decide upon a fact
before it, of a nature to be punished by a beer-penalty, or on other
beer-business. It consists of three Beer-honourable beer-burschen.
64. A Fox may not sit in a Beer-convention; if he dares to do that, he
is to be be-thundered in a viertel. He falls under the same penalty if
he calls a Beer-convention.
65. So soon as a Beer-convention is called, the functionaries and all
parties concerned must neither _touche_, _foreswear_, nor fore nor
after drink so long as the business lasts. As little may this be done
by another person towards them. Whoever violates this rule is regarded
as a disturber of the convention.
66. The Beer-convention being called, is conducted as follows. The
beer-judge summons the accused; the accuser then lays the case before
the court, which he confirms on his cerevis, which the convention
demands from him, and makes his petition. Hereupon he names his
witness, who is questioned on the alleged fact, and his cerevis also
taken upon it.
67. The accused is now required to bring forward his defence; whereupon
the convention also demands his cerevis, and his witness is heard, also
on his cerevis.
68. Accuser and accused, as well as every one of the judges, have the
right to demand that the witnesses of both parties state the facts upon
which they give their cerevis, fully.
69. When the two parties, with their witnesses, have been heard in this
manner, the beer-judge demands whether either party has yet any thing
further to advance. If this is not the case, the minutes are closed,
and the judge immediately pronounces his judgment.
70. The beer-judges give their judgments in the same order of
succession in which they were called to be judges by the accuser. The
last-voting judge must, on a penalty of a viertel, within five minutes
after the closing of the minutes, write on the beer-table the name of
the be-thundered, or appellant.
71. The agreeing judgments of two beer-judges constitute a sentence,
with the exception of the cases in Secs. 81 and 84.
72. No beer-judge is allowed to state publicly the grounds of his
judgment, when he gives that judgment.
73. No beer-judge may give his vote before the examination is
concluded, and the minutes closed. If he fails in this respect, either
of the parties can expel him from the Beer-convent. In this case,
the accuser has to call another judge. The same is the case when a
beer-judge closes the minutes before the examination is complete. If
the case is disputable, the party who has the right to expel, may call
an umpire, who shall decide.
74. If the Beer-convention has cited the accused, and he omits to
appear and make his defence, he is, on that account, held to be
convicted.
75. No one can refuse to be a beer-judge because he would act as
witness to the accused; but the accused can object to a judge, in case
he takes the office, being received as his witness, but this, at the
latest, must be done before the examination of the witness of the
accuser had been heard, upon which the accuser must choose another
judge.
76. The accuser must put in his petition before his witness is heard. A
petition once put in, cannot be changed. If the accuser puts in a false
one, or none at all, the case will be decided in favour of the accused.
77. Every accusation must be confirmed by the witness or the
beer-tablet. If this is not the case, the accusation is nullified, and
the accuser is nonsuited.
78. If the assertions of both parties are positive, the judge must
decide in favour of the accused.
79. An assertion is negatived when it totally contradicts the fact of
the opponent without supplying another fact, which supersedes the first
fact.
80. Every beer-honourable student, be he Fox or Beer-bursch, can appear
as witness before a Beer-convention.
81. A witness becomes amenable to punishment by giving false evidence
on his cerevis. Whether he has given a false cerevis remains for the
Beer-convent to decide, before which he has appeared as witness,
which, without further proceeding, can immediately be-thunder him as
beer-banned, and mulct in a viertel; but this requires that all the
Beer-judges shall be unanimous.
82. Each party may only call three witnesses in succession. If none of
these speak out satisfactorily, it is to be held that he has no
witness. For the rest, neither party can present more than one
sufficient witness in support of its assertion.
83. Such witnesses as were not present at the fact on which the
Beer-convention has to decide, are held as false witnesses.
84. Intruding witnesses; that is, such as without being called by name
as witnesses by the parties, offer themselves as witnesses, shall not
be accepted, and are to be punished with the beer-bann. The judges
must, however, be unanimous on this head.
85. A beer-judge having once given his vote cannot recall it.
86. No beer-judge can, during the proceedings, speak to any of the
parties concerned, out of the regular course of inquiry. He who does
this is punishable with a viertel.
87. In no case is any one allowed to disturb the proceedings. He who
does this for a fourth time, having thrice been ordered to be quiet, is
to be be-thundered by the same Beer-convention to the Beer-bann, and
penalty of a viertel without further delay. The beer-judges must,
however, be unanimous.
88. When a punishable fact is not laid before a Beer-convention within
three days, it cannot be laid at all, unless the actual absence of
accuser or accused creates sufficient hindrance. But a cerevis given
for a future day, or which requires time to prove whether it may not be
false, forms an exception. Farther, a cerevis given for a future day is
not nullified by a Beer-bann falling between that time and the time for
which it is given.
89. A Beer-convention may only be postponed three days, and only then
when the witness of the accused is absent.
90. If one is accused on account of a quantity not drunken at the right
time, or not drunken at all, the said quantity is to be added to the
penalty in his be-thundering.
91. If a quantity has been fore-drunken to the be-thundered, before the
commencement of the Beer-convention, which he has not after-drunken,
then must they who have fore-drunken this quantity on his be-thundering
show this same quantity to the Beer-convention, corroborating their
assertion with their cerevis and a witness, whereupon also this must be
added to his Beer-penalty.
92. The same is the case when he has contracted a beer-scandal with any
one before the Beer-convent sate, and has not fought it out: but the
latter party with whom he has made this contract, must drink the
prescribed quantity before the Beer-convent.
93. Not more than one Beer-convent can be called over one and the same
person on account of the same fact, except if a Beer-convention is
postponed; or a Beer-convention being called, is rendered null by a
Fox, or one under Beer-bann having been called upon it, and in it
having sat.
94. A Fox may neither for himself nor for another call a Beer-convent,
but he must procure this to be done through a beer-honourable
Beer-bursch. The last can, however, call himself as one, in case other
beer-honourable Beer-burschen are wanting for the Beer-convention.
95. Only one Beer-convention may be called at the same time in the same
kneip.
(_b_) OF THE GENERAL BEER-CONVENTION.
96. The general Beer-convention, which must consist at least of five
Chore Burschen, is the highest and last Court of Appeal; and therefore
its decision is final and unalterable.
97. Every Saturday evening, at an hour fixed in the beginning of each
course, is the General Beer-convention held, to which every Verbindung
then existing in Heidelberg, must send a Chore-bursch, who must,
however, be a beer-honourable Beer-bursch. Should less than five Chores
exist, the S. C. must take care that still five beer-judges must sit in
the General Beer-convention.
98. These judges must assemble themselves, at the appointed hour, at
the kneip of the Secretary, under the penalty of a quarter-crown for
coming late, and of a half-crown for not coming at all. A beer-judge
comes late when he is not present on the striking of the fixed hour.
99. In case that, at the fixed hour, the Beer-judges of all the
Verbindungs are not present, five beer-judges are sufficient to open
the court and proceed to business.
100. When the required number of beer-judges are present, the
Beer-convent must be opened with the stroke of the appointed hour. If
they find no appellant, they must wait half-an-hour. If no one appears
at the expiration of this time, the judges are authorized to withdraw.
101. If, after the expiration of this half-hour, five judges agree to
wait longer, they can still represent the General Beer-convention; but
the General Convention must be closed at the end of an hour, unless
instantly occurring and pressing business make that impossible.
102. It is free to the accuser as to the accused to appeal to the
General Beer-convention, against a sentence of the Special Convention;
but this must be done within five minutes after the declaration of the
sentence, and the judges concerned must be cited at the same time. The
appeal must come on at the General Beer-convention, at the fixed place,
the next Saturday evening.
103. If the appellant exceeds this time, without being able to show
the impossibility of then proceeding with the business on which the
Beer-convention has to decide, he loses the right to appeal, and moreover,
must pay a viertel. If on the contrary, one cited to appear before the
General Beer-convention is prevented, he can, though a proxy, bring
forward his excuse; upon the acceptance of which the General
Beer-convention is to decide. If it finds the excuse satisfactory, the
business stands over to the next General Beer-convention.
104. An appeal to the General Beer-convention can indeed be revoked,
but this must be done within five minutes after declaring an intention
to appeal, and, in fact, before a Beer-convention called for the
purpose. If it he revoked later, the revoker must pay a viertel.
105. He is excluded from the right to appeal to a General Beer-convent
who has been declared to be a false or intruding witness by a special
Beer-convention, and is, on that account, be-thundered; and so is he
also who has more than three times disturbed the proceedings of the
Special Beer-convention.
106. The proceedings of the General Beer-convention in matters laid
before it, is the same as that of the Special Beer-conventions, with
the following exceptions. If the parties cited before the General
Beer-convention do not appear, nor appoint proxies, they may, after the
accuser has made his complaint, and corroborated it by witnesses, be
punished for contempt of court.
(1) Moreover, any one who has to appear before the General
Beer-convention, must present himself before the table with uncovered
head.
(2) No beer-judge of the General Beer-convention is bound to
take a beer-challenge from any one while he sits in the General
Beer-convention.
(3) The General has the right to punish with the punishment, for the
disturbance of Beer-conventions, prescribed by the Comment, any one
who, during one and the same proceeding, shall have broken the silence
enjoined four times; and he who more than four times shall have broken
the same, shall, moreover, be reported to the S. C. and by it be fined
a half-crown.
107. The majority of voices decides here, as in the Special
Beer-conventions. Is the number of the represented Chores equal, the
representative of the Chore to which the secretary belongs gives the
casting vote.
108. No appellant can lay his complaint before the General, till he has
set before it a viertel; but, in case he carries his charge through, he
has the right to name one of the condemned to the General, who shall
reimburse him this viertel.
Should the accused be be-thundered, so go they every one into
Beer-banishment, and have two viertels to set forth; but that viertel
which has been reimbursed by one of them to the accuser is reckoned off.
If the appellant is cast, he is equally condemned to two viertels. But
as he has already set one viertel before the General, he is only
written down on the beer-tablet one viertel. If he was the accuser
before the Special Beer-convention, the General has to give its
commission, to wipe him out from the beer-tablet, and to write him down
as chargeable with a viertel under its order. If he was the accused, so
must he, according to the commission of the General, be wiped out of
the beer-tablet with the B. A., and with the prescribed penalty of the
Special Beer-convention, together with the new viertel, be written down
on the beer-tablet, under the order of the General.
The appointed penalties are written down in the Special Chore-kneip.
109. During the vacation, the number of five beer-honourable
Beer-burschen are authorized to represent a General Beer-convention,
without respect to Verbindungs. Such a General Beer-convention in the
vacation, must be called within eight days, or, otherwise, if no
sufficient grounds of excuse are brought forward, the sentence of the
Special Convention remains in full force; the appellant is be-thundered,
and the right to further appeal is lost.
TITULUS VIII.
OF THE BEER PENALTIES.
I. SIMPLE.
(_a_) OF THE BEER-BANN.
110. The Beer-bann is that punishment by which the beer-honourable
student, while he is be-thundered to four choppins, loses all his
beer-rights in the Special Kneip in which he stands inscribed.
111. The Beer-bann, besides the loss of all beer-rights, has also this
consequence, that the be-thundered, neither mediately nor immediately,
can bring his beer to the table where the Beer-honourable kneip. Should
he do this, every beer-honourable is at liberty to throw the beer of
the be-thundered upon the ground.
112. The beer-banned appellant, indeed, equally forfeits all
beer-rights, yet can he bring his beer to the table where the
beer-honourables kneip, and he may not be called a beerschisser, or
beer-banished-man, and can for and after drink with any beer-honourable
that he can engage to do so.
113. But on account of such quantity either for or after drunken, a
Beer-convention cannot be called by either party.
114. No beer-honourable is allowed to either fore or after drink with a
beer-banned man; does any one this, he goes into beer-banishment.
115. A beer-banished man can never be called before a Beer-convention
and be be-thundered on account of a fact which renders him liable to
beer-banishment, but only on one which renders him liable to pay a
viertel. He then renders himself liable to a viertel when he calls a
beer-honourable, or a beer-banned appellant, a beerschisser.
116. If any one perpetrates an act against a beerschisser, which
renders him liable to a setting forth of a viertel, the beerschisser
can call this person before the Beer-convention, but he must do it
through a beer-honourable Beer-bursch, and lay his complaint through
the same, strengthening also his accusation by two beer-honourable
cerevises.
117. A term of eight days is appointed to the beerschisser (the
beer-banned) from the day of his be-thundering, during which time he
must cause himself to be fought-out in the following manner. If he
exceeds this term, and that without special grounds of excuse, as sickness
or absence, he is be-thundered in two viertels; which penalty, from eight
days to eight days, if he does not fight himself out, is doubled.
118. The fighting cutis in this manner. The beerschisser, who will
fight himself out, requests a beer-honourable Beer-bursch to call his
name out in the kneip on whose beer-tablet he stands inscribed; but
this can only be done in the presence of three beer-honourable
Beer-burschen. The out-fighter must at every one of the four choppins,
three times slowly and formally demand who will drink them with the
beerschisser. The fighter-out is not an umpire. If any one is not
satisfied with the proceedings of the fighter-out, this last must name
an umpire.
119. The beerschisser must from five minutes to five minutes drink each
of the choppins.
120. If any one announces that he will drink a choppin with the
beerschisser, this person must name an umpire, who must make the
weapons equal, and who, as in a Beer-scandal, has to command.
Each one to be fought-out has at least two choppins to drink.
If two out of the whole four choppins are not yet accepted the
fighter-out has to drink out the remaining quantity with the
to-be-fought-out person, in the regular time, and in the presence of an
umpire.
121. He who, as umpire, has commanded during the last choppin which the
beerschisser, as such, drinks, must immediately proclaim him three
times loudly and formally in the kneip as beer-honourable.
In case the beerschisser has already drunk two choppins, and no one
announces himself for the fourth, the fighter-out has this duty to
perform.
The order must, at the same time, be given, and where it is possible,
to a Fox, to wipe the beerschisser from the beer-tablet.
If the umpire proclaims the out-to-be-fought as beer-honourable too
early, or too late, he himself goes into beer-banishment.
122. Both parties must drink at once, on the word of command. If the
beerschisser does this not, he is be-thundered to a viertel; if the
other, who, according to the declaration of the fighter-out, has to
drink with the beerschisser, drinks not at the same time, he goes into
beer-banishment.
123. If the beerschisser does not drink, after the command is given,
his choppin in the five minutes, he continues a beerschisser, and the
choppin not drunken by him is written on the beer-tablet in addition.
124. In all these cases the commanding umpire has the right to
pronounce the penalty on the defaulters, without further proceeding,
and cause them to be written on the beer-tablet, nor can he for this be
called to account.
125. If one has been be-thundered on account of an unperformed quantity
of fore or after drinking, he must drink the quantity still due,
from five minutes to five minutes, after he has again been declared
beer-honourable.
126. This must be done before those whom he has to drink after; or,
should they be absent, before two beer-honourable witnesses.
127. The beerschisser has all the choppins that have been drunken with
him during the fighting-out by the out-fighters immediately to pay for.
128. If the beerschisser has requested any one to call on him to be
fought-out, he cannot again revoke the call; if he does this, he is
mulct in a viertel.
129. The beerschisser has the right, during the pawking, or
fighting-out, to have the beer necessary for the out-pawking upon the
table at which the beer-honourables kneip.
130. Only one beerschisser can be pawked-out at one time.
131. He goes into beer-banishment--
(1) Who gives a false cerevis.
(2) Who offends against Sec. 34.
(3) Who permits a beer-touche, or provocation, to stand against him
beyond the regular time, and neither challenges, fixes the time, nor
fights out, without having any sufficient ground of excuse to give. The
sufficient grounds are--
(_a_) Older scandals, but not fore or after drinking quantities.
(_b_) If he has received no beer, spite of its having been
immediately ordered, after challenge or fixing of the time has taken
place.
(4) Who has declared a beerschisser, either by word or deed, to be
beer-honourable. This happens through--
(_a_) He who contracts a scandal or fights one out with a
beerschisser, and kneips with him in beer; that is,
(a) He who fore or after drinks with a beerschisser. (Sec. 114).
(_b_) He who has his beer standing on the same table with that of a
beerschisser.
(_c_) He who plays with a beerschisser at a beer-play.
(_d_) He who with the beerschisser pours out of the same vessel, or
drinks with him out of the same glass.
(b) He who "catches out"[52] a beerschisser in the kneip, where the
same stands inscribed as beerschisser on the beer-tablet.
(c) He who calls a Beer-convention upon a case against a
beerschisser, which does not render him liable to a penalty of a
viertel. (Sec. 115).
(d) He who submits to the same a beer-case for decision, or calls
him as witness.
(e) He who too early proclaims the fought-out, beer-honourable.
(Sec. 121).
(5) He who too late declares the fought-out, beer-honourable.
(Sec. 121).
(6) He who calls a beer-honourable, or a beer-banned-appellant, a
beerschisser.
(7) He who does not set out the appointed quantity within eight days.
(8) He who in pawking-out a beerschisser commands on a bad choppin.
(9) He who ought to drink with a beerschisser in his out-fighting, and
does not drink at the right time, or drink at all.
(10) He who makes a quantity common; that is, fore or after drinks a
quantity with a third person also, which he ought to drink with one
only.
(11) The umpire whose decision before a Beer-convention is declared to
be unjust (Sec. 62).
(12) The second who has to make the weapons equal, but who, according
to the decision of a called-up umpire, has unjustly declared them to be
equal.
(_f_) He who declares the decision of an umpire to be unjust without
being able to show that it is so.
(13) Intruding witness. (Sec. 62).
(14) He who does not call a Beer-convention on account of a fact
which is directed against himself, and which is punishable with
beer-banishment.
(15) He who does not within five minutes drink the quantity dictated to
him by the President of the Beer-convention. (Sec. 146).
(B.) OF SETTING FORTH BEER.
Sec. 132. Every viertel to be set out (that is, four measures, four jugs,
or five bottles) is written down on the beer-tablet, and must within
eight days, be set before a Beer-convention. He who exceeds this term,
goes into beer-banishment. The Beer-convention which has be-thundered
him, has at the same time to give the order that he and this quantity
be wiped off the beer-tablet, and that he be written down anew under
this date.
133. The Beer-convention, and he who sets it out, have equally
participation in this beer, and should the setter-out be a Fox, he too,
who called the Beer-convention for him; but the Beer-convention can, if
it please, make this quantity over to the General company.
134. A viertel must set-out--
(1) The Fox who _touches_, or provokes a beer-bursch to a challenge
in beer, or in a beer-challenge doubles on him. (Sec. 23.)
(2) The Fox who has called a Beer-convention, or sits in one.
(Sec. 64.)
(3) The Fox who becomes an Umpire. (Sec. 64.)
(4) The Fox who touches the beer-cudgel of the President in a
Beer-commers.
(5) Every one who, being called on to second, refuses without
sufficient ground. (Sec. 36.)
(6) He who offends against Sec. 37.
(7) He who offends against Secs. 42 and 43.
(8) He who touches in beer a Declarer, and does not immediately
revoke the touche. (Sec. 48.)
(9) A Declarer who touches another who has not declared. (Sec. 48.)
(10) He who refuses without justifiable ground to act as umpire.
(Sec. 48.)
(11) He who cribs beer in drinking, or spills the beer of another,
or fouls it.
(12) He who forgets his Smollis.[53]
(13) He who touches an Umpire, knowing him to be such.
(14) He who insults or calumniates a Beer-convention.
(15) He who declares the decision of a Beer-convention to be unjust;
but this shall not include the appeal to a General.
(16) The Beer-judge who offends against Sec. 34.
(17) He who declares that he will appeal to a General, and yet does
it not on the proper day. (Sec. 103.)
(18) He who has declared that he would appeal to a General, but
makes this later than five minutes after his declaration. (Sec. 104.)
(19) The beerschisser who sits in Beer-convention, or at all acts in
beer-suits.
(20) The beerschisser who, after he has allowed himself to be called
upon to be fought-out, revokes. (Sec. 128.)
(21) The beerschisser who in the fighting-out does not drink in
time. (Sec. 122.)
(22) The beerschisser, who calls a beer-honourable or
beer-banned-Appellant, a Beerschisser. (Sec. 115.)
(23) He who alters or writes down any thing on the beer-tablet, or
expunges any thing, without the right to do it (Sec. 136.)
(24) He who writes down, by his own fault, the name of the
be-thundered, or of the accuser-appellant, wrong. (Sec. 139.)
(25) The be-thundered or accuser-appellant who purposely spells his
name wrong to the writer-down. (Sec. 139.)
(26) He who, indeed, writes down the name of the be-thundered, or of
the accuser-appellant on the tablet correctly, but who states a false
date or a false quantity.
(27) He who does not convey the commission of writing down or
expunging within five minutes.
(28) Every one whose duty it is to write down or expunge from the
tablet, and does not do this within five minutes.
(29) He who gives to another without due authority, an order to
alter, or to write down upon, or to expunge any thing from the tablet.
(Sec. 138.)
(30) He who does not call a Beer-convent upon a fact which renders
liable to the setting-forth of a viertel.
(31) When one is caught-out--that is, if he lifts the lid of a
covered glass (and jugs and bottles are also included) in which so much
beer yet remains as will cover the bottom, so far that another can
insinuate his hand between the vessel and the lid, and thereupon cry
"caught-out;" or when one is caught-out who covers an empty glass,
though this latter person is under no necessity to cover the empty
glass again.
(32) He who catches out without cause--that is, he who catches one
out, who in the lifting of his lid has said--"without catching-out;" or
who, while the beer is pouring puts his hand between; or who makes an
erroneous catching-out with an empty glass.
(33) He who speaks ill of any of the Faculties.
II. SHARPER BEER PENALTIES.
Sec. 135. The sharper beer-penalty is, when any one is be-thundered
at the same time to more than one viertel, or to beer-banishment and
beer-setting-forth.
(_a_) HE IS CONDEMNED TO MORE THAN ONE VIERTEL,
(1) Who offends against Sec. 44.
(2) The accuser who, going before the General, fails to make good
his accusation, and is mulct in two viertels. (Sec. 108).
(3) The Beerschisser, who does not cause himself to be fought-out
within the proper period, falls under the penalty of Sec. 117.
(_b_) THEY ARE CONDEMNED TO BEER-BANISHMENT AND BEER SETTING-FORTH:
(1) False witnesses, (Sec. 81.)
(2) Those who disturb the proceedings of the Beer-convention for the
fourth time, either by speaking, crying out, singing, or whispering to
one another, after silence has been three times commanded. (Secs. 87 and
106.)
(3) All those who act contrary to Sec. 65.
(_c_) THEY ARE CONDEMNED TO THE SETTING OUT OF TWO VIERTELS AND TO
BEER-BANISHMENT.
(1) The Beer-judges whom the General Beer-convention reproves.
(2) He who abuses this Beer-comment, or alters any thing in it.
TITULUS IX.
OF THE BEER-TABLET.
Sec. 136. In every special kneip a Beer-tablet is to be hung up;
upon which the names of Beerschisser, Viertel-out-setters, and
Accuser-appellants are written, under different rubrics, with addition
of their respective dates and quantities.
137. No one may write any thing upon the Beer-tablet, alter, or expunge
any thing, who has not received a commission to that purpose, from a
beer-judge, an umpire, a president of a beer-commers, or from one who
has declared the Beerschisser to be Beer-honourable.
138. He who has received the commission for expunging or writing down,
must do this within five minutes: otherwise he is be-thundered in a
viertel. He who gives an unauthorized commission falls under the same
penalty. But in this case, he who has received the commission to write
down or expunge, is not punishable.
139. If any one has received a commission to write down a be-thundered
in the Beer-tablet; but the be-thundered declares that he shall appeal
to the general Beer-convention, the writer-down must note this by the
addition of the two letters B. A. under the name of the be-thundered.
So also the writer-down must place in the proper rubric him who has
proceeded as accuser before a special Beer-convention, and declare that
he will appeal to a General one.
140. Every one who has received a commission to write any one down in
the Beer-tablet, has a right to ask the same how he writes his name,
whereupon that person must clearly spell it out to him. If the
commissioner does not ask the name of the to-be-written-down, or has
this person spelt his name out rightly to him, and he yet, in both
eases, write it down wrong, he is thereupon be-thundered in a viertel,
without in this case the one to-be-written-down being freed from his
penalty. But if the to-be-written-down gives him his name wrong, then
he falls under the penalty.
141. He who has written down any one with authority on the Beer-tablet,
and has written him down wrong, is to be called before a future Special
Beer-convention. This Beer-convention has to take care that the fault
of him who received the commission be amended.
[The remainder of this Beer-Comment is given in the chapter describing
a Commers.]
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 1: The author here makes no charge against the great numbers
of high-minded and gentlemanly young men who pass through, and confer
distinction on, our universities; but, as before observed, alludes only
to that class and those parties, which are not only depicted by the
Westminster Review, but so fully described by the Editor of the
Quarterly Review, in "Reginald Dalton."]
[Footnote 2: The term _Rechtspracticant_ implies the commonest, the
lowest, and most tedious stage of a statesman's career: in fact, while
he is acting as a clerk or pupil in the amtmann's office, he acquires
_practical_ knowledge of the administration of justice.]
[Footnote 3: The words in the original are "on their Cerevis," a
student term, "on their beer;" meaning, in the beer-court, on their
honour.]
[Footnote 4: Inhabitants of the Marsch.]
[Footnote 5: In the Graffschaft Mark.]
[Footnote 6: Play on the grandiloquent words of Kotzebue.]
[Footnote 7: About a pint.]
[Footnote 8: Probably to prevent Kotzebue's retreat.]
[Footnote 9: No person in Germany can fill any office in a state, not
even that of a postmaster, or captain of police, nor follow any of the
high professions, those of law, divinity, and physic, after he has
passed his college examinations, and taken his degree, without having
undergone another examination before a board expressly appointed by
each state.]
[Footnote 10: The founder of the Orphan-House.]
[Footnote 11: The established word for shirt-collar in Germany is the
very odd one of Vater-moerder, literally "Father-killers;" and they are
said to have acquired this name from an anecdote manufactured on their
first introduction, in order to ridicule their extravagant size and
stiffness, as worn by buckish young men. It was said that so large and
stiffly-starched had a young student his collar, that when he went
home, in rushing to embrace his father, he run him through the neck
with the point of it, and killed him on the spot.]
[Footnote 12: This word, to suit the air, must be pronounced postilyon,
with a strong accent on the last syllable.]
[Footnote 13: Cicero, humorously here thus pronounced, because a party
among the classics insist that it was anciently so pronounced.]
[Footnote 14: Labours hard, like an ox.]
[Footnote 15: As we have no word or short phrase in English to express
this German custom, we retain their own term, which means touch your
glasses together; their mode of expressing civility, as in our drinking
to each other, and used by them on all occasions of festivity and
rejoicing, as in giving a health, a vivat, or a toast.]
[Footnote 16: The Chore colours.]
[Footnote 17: A dandy.]
[Footnote 18: While translating this passage, the tidings have come
across the river, that a student is shot dead in the wood opposite to
my windows behind the Hirsch-gasse, in a duel with pistols.--Tr.]
[Footnote 19: In English money, from about three to seven pounds.]
[Footnote 20: The bell which it rung at a quarter to eleven at night,
at the hearing of which all persons are to evacuate public-houses, and
betake themselves home.]
[Footnote 21: The university of Heidelberg.]
[Footnote 22: The everlasting subject of regret to the merchant in
Kotzebue's comedy _Pagen-Streiche_.]
[Footnote 23: Because it was the Burschenschaft riband, and therefore a
great desecration to be worn by a Knoten.]
[Footnote 24: A well known Wirthshouse.]
[Footnote 25: A Besom is a girl.]
[Footnote 26: The Senior.]
[Footnote 27: Schools in which all the real and practical branches of
education necessary or advantageous to the business of life, are
taught, in contradistinction to the ideal and more ornamental branches,
as literature, metaphysics, the more critical prosecution of the
classics, etc.]
[Footnote 28: These are not to be confounded with common
Gewerb-schools, which are merely for mechanics: by keeping in mind the
_Higher_ Gewerb-school, the distinction is clear.]
[Footnote 29: Right of matriculation in the universities on the ground
of the applicant having properly matured his studies in the Gymnasium.]
[Footnote 30: Here the learned author undoubtedly alludes to the
universal passion for smoking. Germany is truly, in every sense a
_piping_ nation.]
[Footnote 31: This is translated with the same free defiance of rhyme
and metre as distinguishes the original, and which may find plenty of
parallels in our own old ballads of the people.]
[Footnote 32: States Confederation.]
[Footnote 33: Parliament of a State.]
[Footnote 34: A slanting cut in the left cheek.]
[Footnote 35: Great tun.]
[Footnote 36: A tale of Hauff's under that name.]
[Footnote 37: See the Special Commers.]
[Footnote 38: We have here introduced Koerner's idea for the sake of
euphony.]
[Footnote 39: Touching their glasses. The humorous Schluck says that
Schmollis is by some derived from the obsolete word Schmollen--to blow
one's-self up, to make one's-self great; that is, before another, by
drinking. Schmollen, at the same time means to be angry, to make a
face, etc.; meanings, however, which are not to the purpose. Others
derive it from the two syllables, Schmal aus (schmalus, schmollis,)
equivalent to clean out, that is, the glass to the last drop, as the
old song says--"There remains not a nail's proof even within."]
[Footnote 40: Remark of the translator of Schluck's Latin. "This is
false. No real student does pay his shot."]
[Footnote 41: A stick, or rather a cudgel, but a rapier is the most
reasonable.]
[Footnote 42: Inn.]
[Footnote 43: Lateinisch (Latin.)]
[Footnote 44: Buerger's Abbot, with the king's three questions. The same
legend as the Abbot of Canterbury and King John.]
[Footnote 45: The Wirthshaus of Sadler Mueller.]
[Footnote 46: It is a popular expression in Germany when children are
rubbing their eyes, a symptom that they are sleepy and ready for
bed--that the Sandman has thrown sand in their eyes.]
[Footnote 47: House of the Philistine in which he had lived.]
[Footnote 48: Holidays--the vacation.]
[Footnote 49: College portfolio, which the student is continually
carrying about under his arm. With the exception of the sword, this is
one of the most striking descriptions of a student of the present day
imaginable.]
[Footnote 50: Literally be-thundered.]
[Footnote 51: The cause and matter of the challenge, and the business
of the strife itself till decided.]
[Footnote 52: In the Kneip they drink out of glasses with lids. If the
user of a glass as he sits so far lifts up the lid that the next person
can pass two fingers under, and cries "abgefasst," "I've caught thee
out!" the person is said to be "caught out," and pays a penalty in
beer. To avoid this, he must when he lifts his lid, say "ohne
abzufassen," "without being liable to be caught out."]
[Footnote 53: His agreement with another to thee and thou, and,
forgetting it, addresses him as you.]
THE END.
End of Project Gutenberg's The Student-Life of Germany, by William Howitt