The vision was ended. David Whitmer and Oliver Cowdery had obtained

their desire. They had beheld the plates in the hands of an angel; and

they had heard the voice of the angel, and another voice from heaven

declaring the correctness of the translation made by the Prophet. It

was a marvelous manifestation; these men could not but testify of what

they had seen and heard.

In the meantime, Martin Harris was in another part of the wood

pleading with the Lord. Earlier in the day, the Prophet had said to

him solemnly, "Martin Harris, you have got to humble yourself before

your God this day, that you may obtain a forgiveness of your sins. If

you do, it is the will of God that you should look upon the plates in

company with Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer."[H] But Martin Harris

had not sufficiently humbled himself. The testimony from heaven was not

given until Martin had withdrawn from his friends. He began then more

fully to appreciate his unworthiness. He retired some distance from his

brethren, and began there to supplicate the Lord, striving earnestly so

to abase the pride of his spirit that he might receive the divine favor.

[Footnote H: Lucy Smith, "History of the Prophet Joseph Smith," ch. 31.]

It was in this frame of mind, and thus occupied, that the Prophet found

him at the close of the angelic visit. The spirit of Martin Harris was

thoroughly humbled. He besought the Prophet earnestly to join him in

his supplications. He craved earnestly the sublime testimony that had

been given his associates. Accordingly, the Prophet knelt again with

him in prayer. "And ultimately [we] obtained our desires," writes the

Prophet, "for before we had yet finished the same vision was opened

to our view, at least it was again opened to me, and I once more

beheld and heard the same things; whilst at the same moment, Martin

Harris cried out, apparently in an ecstasy of joy, ''Tis enough; 'tis

enough; mine eyes have beheld; mine eyes have beheld;' and jumping

up, he shouted, 'Hosanna,' blessing God, and otherwise rejoiced

exceedingly."[I]

[Footnote I: "History of the Church," Vol. I, p. 55.]

The three chosen witnesses to the Book of Mormon had, then, all

received their testimonies by divine manifestation. The fact that

Martin Harris experienced considerable difficulty in obtaining the

testimony, and that he overcame that difficulty is significant. It adds

materially to the reality and the value of the testimony, that the

three, though separated in the actual seeing of the vision, can yet

bear testimony to the same manifestation in every detail. And all three

did bear testimony. Just after the title-page, in the Book of Mormon,

appears "The Testimony of Three Witnesses."[J] This testimony is

declared "with words of soberness;" and those who gave it to the world

never once faltered in its defense.

[Footnote J: See Chapter VI.]

Besides these three, there were others also who were favored to see

and handle the original plates of the Book of Mormon. These others,

however, were not shown the plates by divine manifestation. It was

soon after the testimony of three witnesses had been obtained through

the ministrations of an angel. The Prophet, Joseph Smith, had gone

from Fayette to Manchester to arrange for the printing of the Book of

Mormon. He was accompanied by Hiram Page, and several of the Whitmers.

At Manchester, he was joined by Joseph Smith, Sr., Hyrum Smith, and

Samuel H. Smith. The company thus consisted of the Prophet, with

Christian Whitmer, Jacob Whitmer, Peter Whitmer, Jr., John Whitmer,

Hiram Page, Joseph Smith, Sr., Hyrum Smith, and Samuel H. Smith. The

Prophet himself showed to the eight witnesses the original plates of

the Nephite record. It was a plain, matter-of-fact exhibition. The

witnesses not only saw the plates, but handled them, and examined the

engravings on them. And "with words of soberness" they, too, testified

of what they had seen.

It is small wonder that, in the light of the evidence here presented,

it is asserted that the "Book of Mormon" is the best authenticated

sacred record of which the history of the world can boast. Eleven

witnesses, on their honor, testify that they have seen and examined

the plates from which the translation was made. Three of them testify

further that an angel appeared before them and assured them that the

translation of the engravings on the plates was accomplished by the

power of God, and was correct. What better or stronger testimony

could be required? In the case of the "Book of Mormon," at least, the

assertion is true, that not a single important step in the progress

of the restoration was taken without corroborative testimony or the

presence of witnesses.

It will be interesting now to return briefly to the first ten visions,

and learn what effect the testimonies of the eleven witnesses have upon

them. Unquestionably, the nine visits of the angel, Moroni, looked to

the translation of the sacred plates as well as to the restoration of

the fulness of the gospel. On the first night of his appearance to the

boy-prophet, the angel showed the boy in vision the hill Cumorah, and

the place where the plates were hidden. The next day he met the boy

on the sacred hill. Once a year for four years thereafter, the angel

and the boy met at the place where the plates lay concealed. And at

every meeting of the two, the theme between them was largely the coming

forth of the Book of Mormon. It is true that at each ministration

of the Angel Moroni, Joseph Smith was alone with him. There were no

eyewitnesses. Yet, in the light of the testimony borne by the three,

there can be no doubt that the angel did visit the prophet; and in

the light of the additional testimony of the eight, there can be no

reasonable doubt that the plates were delivered to him. The testimony

of the eleven witnesses confirm the story of the visits of the angel

Moroni. In this case, too, then, the assertion holds: Not a single

important step in the progress of the restoration was taken without

corroborative testimony or the presence of witnesses.

In a similar way, the testimonies of the eleven witnesses corroborate

the story of the first glorious vision of the Father and the Son. It

was in that vision that the boy-prophet first received his call. It

was then that he learned that the religious world had gone astray,

and that the God of heaven had a great work for him to do. That work

was to restore the fulness of the Gospel. But the restoration of

the Gospel involved the revelation of the "Book of Mormon," and the

translation of the sacred record. Neither the revelation of the book

nor the translation of it, could have been accomplished had the first

vision been a delusion. In fact, the full subsequent history of the

restoration depends upon the authenticity of that vision. It is not

too much to say again then, that in the case of the first vision also,

the assertion is establised, that, not a single important step in the

progress of the restoration was taken without corroborative testimony

or the presence of witnesses.

Great weight is thus laid upon the testimonies of the three and the

eight. Their solemn declarations confirm the words of the Prophet

concerning the opening acts of the restoration. Now, there are those

who question the value of the testimonies of these eleven men. They

assert that the witnesses were under the influence of the young

Prophet--hypnotized by him; or that they were themselves parties to

a tremendous fraud. It will be interesting to consider briefly what

became of each one of these eleven men, and to learn how they viewed in

later life the testimonies they had published to the world.

Oliver Cowdery was born at Wells, Rutland County, Vermont, in October,

1805. He met the Prophet, Joseph Smith, April 5th, 1829, became his

scribe during the translation of the Book of Mormon, and was baptized

with the Prophet in June, 1829. Oliver Cowdery rose to great prominence

in the new Church. It appears, however, that he was possessed of

serious weaknesses. In 1838, certain charges were preferred against

him before the High Council at Far West. Some of the charges were

sustained, and since he did not make satisfactory amends, Oliver

Cowdery was excommunicated from the Church. He went thereupon to

Michigan to practice law. Once, a fellow practitioner said to him,

"Mr. Cowdery, I see your name is attached to this book [the 'Book of

Mormon']. If you believe it to be true, why are you in Michigan?" After

reading the names of the witnesses, he continued, "Mr. Cowdery, do you

believe this book?"

"No, sir," responded Mr. Cowdery, quickly.

"But your name is attached to it," protested his fellow-lawyer, "and

you declare here that you saw an angel, and also the plates from which

the book purports to be translated; and now you say you don't believe

it. Which time did you tell the truth?"

"My name is attached to that book, and what I there have said is true,"

replied Oliver Cowdery with emphasis. "I did see this; I know I saw

it, and faith has nothing to do with it, as a perfect knowledge has

swallowed up the faith which I had in the work, knowing, as I do, that

it is true."[K]

[Footnote K: "Historical Record," pp. 200, 201.]

And so it was always: Oliver Cowdery never wavered in his testimony.

Surely, if he had been under the influence of Joseph Smith at the time

of the angelic ministration, he was from under it now. Or if he had

connived with Joseph Smith at a monstrous fraud, he was not concerned

in it now that he had been cast off by the Church. This one bit of

unwilling testimony is alone sufficient to establish the truth of the

whole testimony of the three. Oliver Cowdery repented and joined the

Church again in 1848, during the troublous days of the expulsion of

the Church from Nauvoo. It is worthy of note that these were days of

severe tribulation to the Church. Oliver Cowdery could gain nothing by

rejoining it then. Moreover, the Prophet was dead. What Oliver Cowdery

did in 1848, he did because of the deep conviction of his own soul, and

not because of the influence of Joseph Smith. Oliver Cowdery died in

1850. His dying words were a changeless testimony of the divine truth

of the "Book of Mormon."

David Whitmer, too, testified unchangeably to the truth of the

testimony he had signed and given to the world. David Whitmer was

born near Harrisburg, Pa., January 7th, 1805. He was baptized, June,

1829. Like Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer rose to prominence in the

Church. Like Oliver Cowdery, he became estranged from the Church. On

April thirteenth, 1838, several charges were preferred against him and

sustained. Accordingly he was excommunicated from the Church. David

Whitmer never at any time returned his allegiance to the Church. Yet,

he bore an unchangeable, undying testimony to the divine truth of the

"Book of Mormon."

In 1881, one John Murphy asserted that David Whitmer had denied his

testimony as one of the three witnesses to the "Book of Mormon." David

Whitmer immediately published in the Conservator of Richmond, Missouri,

a refutation of the lie:

"That the world may know the truth," he wrote, "I wish now, standing as

it were in the very sunset of life, and in the fear of God, once for

all to make this public statement:

"That I have never at any time denied that testimony or any part

thereof, which has so long since been published with that book, as

one of the Three Witnesses. Those who know me best, well know that I

have always adhered to that testimony. And that no man may be misled

or doubt my present views in regard to the same, I do again affirm the

truth of all my statements as then made and published."[L]

[Footnote L: Quoted in "Historical Record," pp. 210, 211.]

The Prophet, Joseph Smith, had been dead nearly forty years when this

renewed testimony was published by David Whitmer. It would be the

grossest kind of folly to assume that after more than forty years

of independent life and thinking--apart from the Church founded by

the Prophet, with the Prophet himself removed--David Whitmer was

still under "hypnotic," or other, influence of the Prophet. With his

testimony so firm and unshaken, after so many years, it would be the

height of folly to assume that David Whitmer was under any psychic

subjection to the Prophet even at the time of the angelic ministration.

And other false reason for subscribing to such a testimony there could

be none. David Whitmer was not related to Joseph Smith. He was not

interested with him in any business venture. He received no worldly

benefits from his association with the new Church. In short, there was

no reason under heaven why he should have abetted fraudulent purposes

of Joseph Smith, had he been an impostor. David Whitmer's testimony,

then, like Oliver Cowdery's, must remain forever unimpeached, the

stronger for the reason that it remained as firm, as steadfast, after

David Whitmer left the Church, as it ever was before. Whitmer died at

Richmond, Mo., January twenty-fifth, 1888. On his deathbed he bore a

last, irrefragable testimony to the divine authenticity of the "Book

of Mormon," and the truth and integrity of the Testimony of the Three

Witnesses.

Martin Harris was one of Joseph Smith's earliest and closest friends.

Yet, his relations to the Prophet, like those of Oliver and David,

became strained before the martyrdom of the Prophet. Martin Harris

was born at Easttown, New York, May eighteenth, 1783. He met the

young Prophet for the first time in 1827, soon after the Prophet had

received from the angel the plates of the "Book of Mormon." He was

baptized soon after the organization of the Church, in 1830. Martin

Harris, too, was honored in the new Church. He held several positions

of distinction, and as long as the Saints lived in Kirtland, he was

active in the performance of his duties. When, however, the Saints

moved to Missouri, Harris remained in Ohio. Rumors spread that he had

apostatized. Martin Harris never wavered, however, in his testimony to

the "Book of Mormon." After the martyrdom of the Prophet, Martin Harris

came under the influence of the apostate leader, James J. Strang. While

under that influence, he went to England, in 1846, ostensibly to oppose

the Mormon elders laboring there, and to misrepresent the Church. It

seems, however, that he did no harm to anyone. In 1870, Harris came to

Utah, and located in Smithfield. Five years later, in 1875, he died at

Clarkston, nearly ninety-three years of age.

Thirty-one years had passed since the Prophet was slain, and forty-six

years had passed since the miraculous manifestation in which Martin

Harris saw the angel and the plates. Many things had happened during

the long life. While Martin Harris had never actually left the Church,

he had become estranged, and was not in full fellowship for many years.

Yet, in spite of his varied experiences, his testimony never faltered.

And like Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer, his dying words were in

confirmation of the testimony he had given forty-six years before.

"[Martin Harris] was taken sick a week ago yesterday," writes Martin

Harris, Jr., under date of July ninth, 1875, "with some kind of stroke,

or life became so weak and exhausted, that he has no use in his limbs.

He cannot move, only by our aid. * * * He has continued to talk about

and testify to the truth of the "Book of Mormon," and was in his

happiest mood when he could get somebody to listen to his testimony; if

he felt dull and weary at times, and some one would come in and open

up a conversation and give him an opportunity of talking, he would

immediately revive and felt like a young man for a little while."[M] In

this mood he passed away, brightening the last moments of his long life

with the fervor of his testimony to the truth of the "Book of Mormon."

[Footnote M: Quoted in "Historical Record," p. 214.]

All three of the special witnesses to the divinity of the "Book of

Mormon," became estranged from the Prophet and his work. In spite of

all estrangement, however, and even bitterness, they were steadfast

to the last in affirming the truth of their great testimony. Not one

of them wavered; not one of them weakened; not one of them gave that

testimony the lie, either while in the Church or while out of it. And

as the three were true to the last, so also were the eight.

Christian Whitmer died November twenty-seventh, 1835, in full

fellowship in the Church. Jacob Whitmer withdrew from the Church in

1838, and died April twenty-first, 1856, without returning to it.

Peter Whitmer, Jr., died September twenty-second, in full fellowship

in the Church. John Whitmer was excommunicated from the Church March

tenth, 1838. He died out of the Church July eleventh, 1878. Hiram Page

withdrew from the Church in 1838. He died outside of the faith August

twelfth, 1852. Joseph Smith, Sr., died in full fellowship in the Church

September fourteenth, 1840. Hyrum Smith died a martyr to the cause of

Truth June twenty-seventh, 1844. Samuel Harrison Smith died in full

membership, July thirtieth, 1844.

Three of the eight witnesses left the Church and died out of it. It is

a remarkable fact, however, that not only the five who remained true to

the Church, but the other three also, remained true to the testimony

they had borne to the Book of Mormon. No one of them ever denied a

word of that testimony. Most of them survived the Prophet many years.

Whatever influence he had exerted over them in life was surely removed

by death. But after his death, as well as during his life, these eight

witnesses were firm in their assertion that they had seen the plates of

the "Book of Mormon," and had examined them. No amount of persecution

ever made them swerve from that direct truth. No amount of temptation

ever won them to a denial of the testimony. That one truth was so fixed

in their minds that they could never deny it. And each one, as his turn

came to meet grim Death, testified to the last that what he had said

and affirmed so long was verily true.

The testimonies of the eleven witnesses have never been broken.

These testimonies never can be broken. In the wisdom of the Lord the

testimonies have been strengthened by the very defections revealed in

the lives of the witnesses. By their lives and their testimonies they

bear witness, not only to the truth of the "Book of Mormon" and the

actuality of the visions that inaugurated the great latter-day work,

but also to the truth of their own testimonies. It is really remarkable

that the three special witnesses to the "Book of Mormon" became

estranged from the Church, and that three of the eight--making six out

of eleven--forsook the Church. The testimonies of those who left the

Church were made stronger by their apostasy. Had there been delusion

or fraud about the restoration, these men would have revealed it. Not

one of the witnesses who apostatized was related to Joseph Smith.

In their positions as apostates, therefore, they added testimony to

their own testimony, as well as to the divine authority of the Prophet

Joseph Smith. Even in the case of the witnesses themselves, it may be

re-affirmed with assurance, that, not a single important step in the

progress of the restoration was taken without corroborative testimony,

or the presence of witnesses.

XXI.

FURTHER WITNESSES TO THE RESTORATION.

The Latter-day Saints lay claim to so much, and there are so many

impostures in the world, that it is more than fortunate to have the

mission of the American prophet attested, not only by the marvelous

results of his works, but also by the words of witnesses. It is

asserted by the Latter-day Saints that they, and they alone of all the

religious denominations in the world, possess the gospel of the Lord

Jesus in its purity and in its fulness. The sects may promulgate small

portions of the "law of liberty;" they may teach truth in part. It

is not claimed by the Latter-day Saints that they have a monopoly of

Truth. Indeed, every sect that survives the vicissitudes of time must

possess some of the fabric of truth in its structure. No organization

can persist on a foundation of absolute falsehood. But whereas the

sectarian creeds present the "power of God unto salvation" in part

only, the Mormon creed presents it in full, in its natural simplicity,

and not perverted by the doctrines of men.

It is asserted by the Latter-day Saints that they, and they alone of

all the religious denominations in the world, possess a correct Church

organization, patterned after that of the primitive Church of Christ

and the apostles. Other Church organizations retain parts of the

original form. But each one has lost some part or other of the perfect

body. One member has wasted away from disuse here and another there,

until the process of atrophy has left but few of the original officers

and duties of the Church. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day

Saints, however, has a perfect organization. All the officers of the

primitive Church may be found in it, and their several duties are

thoroughly understood.

Moreover, it is asserted by the Latter-day Saints, that, not only do

they alone possess the Gospel in its fullness and the correct Church

organization, but they alone have authority from heaven to officiate in

the ordinances and ceremonies of the Church. Other preachers, pastors,

and ministers may presume to present themselves as servants of the

Most High. But they possess no divine appointment; they have received

no ordination by divine authority. The Elders of the Church of Jesus

Christ alone are endowed with the divine right to preach the Gospel and

to administer in its ordinances.

"Few things about Jesus are more striking or unquestionable than his

sense of authority," says a noted theological student.[A] To Latter-day

Saints this statement is of peculiar interest. They believe that "a

man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands,

by those who are in authority, to preach the Gospel and administer

in the ordinances thereof."[B] A ceremony performed by a man not so

called and ordained can be of no authoritative effect. The sense of

authority, then, found so strikingly present in the ministry of Jesus,

is but the divine appreciation and the divine manifestation of the

necessity of authority. "I am not come of myself,"[C] He was wont to

say; "I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another

shall come in his own name, him ye will receive."[D] That appreciation

of the necessity of divine authority was so strongly marked in the

ministry of Jesus, that He called attention to it even in the sending

forth of His apostles. It was not enough that He should be called of

God; they, too, must receive the call and be ordained. "Ye have not

chosen me," He said, emphasizing the fact that a man cannot choose of

himself to become an apostle of the Lord, "but I have chosen you, and

ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit;"[E] for "as my

Father hath sent me, even so send I you."[F] And the apostles in their

turn learned so well to understand the principle of divine authority

that they challenged the ministry of any man who was not authorized by

Jesus. "A man can receive nothing," explained John the Baptizer when

his disciples complained that Jesus drew all men to Him, "except it be

given him from heaven."[G] And Paul explained that no man can take the

honor of the priesthood to himself, "but he that is called of God as

was Aaron."[H]

[Footnote A: Prof. Samuel Dickey, "The Significance of the Baptism of

Jesus for His Conception of His Ministry," in "Biblical World," June,

1911.]

[Footnote B: Fifth Article of Faith.]

[Footnote C: John 7:28.]

[Footnote D: John 5:43.]

[Footnote E: John 15:16.]

[Footnote F: John 20:21.]

[Footnote G: John 3:27.]

[Footnote H: Heb. 5:4.]

The Restoration of the Gospel · 第 11 / 14 段