AUSTRIA GIVES HOSTAGES TO HISTORY

The Zagreb trial was conducted by a man who gave a good impersonation

of Mr. Justice Shallow. "There is nothing to laugh at!" he cried, when

a Serb doctor was asked whether he did not refuse to wear cravats

because of the resemblance of that word to Croat. The whole farce

resulted, not as one might have expected, in the collapse of the

prosecution but in thirty-one convictions, varying in length from five

to twelve years. The Croats, however, had thwarted Austria's schemes.

They remained true to the Serbs, acted as their counsel without

payment and helped to support the families of the poorer prisoners. At

the Friedjung trial this professor, an eminent historian, produced a

series of photographs of documents which were subsequently shown to

have been fabricated at the Austro-Hungarian legation in Belgrade; he

wished to prove that a political club in that town was guilty of a

most extensive plot involving the Yugoslav territories of the House of

Habsburg. Among those whom these proceedings and those at Zagreb

brought into European prominence were the Pribi[vc]evi['c] brothers, a

very zealous family of Croatian Serbs, that is to say Croats belonging

to the Orthodox Church. [The chief of these four brothers was

Svetozar, a statesman whose Serbo-Croat Coalition party was, with the

advent of Yugoslavia in 1918, to form the nucleus of the Democratic

party. He then became for many months the all-powerful Minister of

the Interior, a man with the appearance of a bull-dog in whose veins

is electricity. The vehemence of his methods of centralization is

supported and opposed by his countrymen with an almost equal

vehemence.] ... But to return to the events of 1908 and 1909--the

result of these two trials was lamentable from the Austrian point of

view. More success attended her efforts in Cetinje, for Nikita was

intensely roused against his son-in-law, and the European reputation

of Serbia was again dragged down to the level of the day which saw the

murder of Alexander and his Queen. An individual called Nasti['c]

whom, according to Professor Friedjung, one could only touch with a

pair of tongs, accused the Serbian Royal Family of attempting to blow

up their picturesque relative, under whose roof, by the way, Princess

Helen of Serbia, his grand-daughter, happened to be staying. The bombs

were carried in an ordinary portmanteau to Kotor, where they were

discovered. Those who believed that Nikita, the arch-intriguer, was

using this method for discrediting the Karageorgevi['c] dynasty, can

point to the fact that he never wanted a public trial, and it seems

probable that Nikita--who was aware that a group of his young,

discontented subjects was planning against him a demonstration, but

nothing more than that, even though there are in the Balkans a certain

number of people who incline to the throwing of a bomb when their

British equivalents would write to the _Times_--it seems probable that

Nikita may not only have stolen their thunder but have put the

lightning in their pockets and have then indignantly revealed it. But

the whole affair is wrapped in darkness and awaits the exploring of

Austria's archives. The probability is that Aerenthal was at his work

to demonstrate that Belgrade was a nest of vipers, so that Europe

would not hearken to their protest when the time came for the House of

Habsburg to smother them.[69] ... This same Austrian police-spy

Nasti['c] had procured for Nikita a certain "revolutionary statue"

which that personage made over to the Imperial authorities, for use

against the Serbs at the Zagreb treason trial. This atrocious deed

against his brother Serbs destroyed for ever the last shreds of

Nikita's reputation.

The Birth of Yugoslavia, Volume 1 · 第 131 / 193 题